Attribute-Value Pairs For Provisioning Customer Equipment Supporting IPv4-Over-IPv6 Transitional Solutions
draft-zhou-dime-4over6-provisioning-03
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Cathy Zhou , Tom Taylor , Qiong Sun , Mohamed Boucadair | ||
| Last updated | 2014-07-21 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-zhou-dime-4over6-provisioning-03
Internet Engineering Task Force C. Zhou
Internet-Draft Huawei Technologies
Intended status: Standards Track T. Taylor
Expires: January 22, 2015 PT Taylor Consulting
Q. Sun
China Telecom
M. Boucadair
France Telecom
July 21, 2014
Attribute-Value Pairs For Provisioning Customer Equipment Supporting
IPv4-Over-IPv6 Transitional Solutions
draft-zhou-dime-4over6-provisioning-03
Abstract
During the transition from IPv4 to IPv6, customer equipment may have
to support one of the various transition methods that have been or
are currently being defined for carrying IPv4 packets over IPv6.
Work is currently in progress to enumerate the information that needs
to be provisioned on a customer edge router to support a list of
transition techniques based on tunneling IPv4 in IPv6, with a view to
defining reusable components for a reasonable transition path between
these techniques. To the extent that the provisioning is done
dynamically, AAA support is needed to provide the information to the
network server responsible for passing the information to the
customer equipment. This document specifies Diameter attribute-value
pairs to be used for that purpose.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 22, 2015.
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Description of the Parameters Required By Each Transition
Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Parameters For Dual-Stack Lite . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. Light Weight IPv4 Over IPv6 (LW4over6) . . . . . . . . . 4
2.3. Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP-E) . 5
2.4. Summary and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3. Derived AVP Data Formats: AddressOrPrefix . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. Attribute-Value Pair Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.1. Border-Router-Name AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.2. Tunnel-Source-Pref-Or-Addr AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.3. Port-Set-Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.4. LW4over6-Binding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.5. MAP-E-Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.6. MAP-Mapping-Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1. Introduction
A number of transition technologies have been or are being defined to
allow IPv4 packets to pass between hosts and IPv4 networks over an
intervening IPv6 network while minimizing the number of public IPv4
addresses that need to be consumed by the hosts. Different operators
will deploy different technologies, and sometimes one operator will
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
use more than one technology, depending on what is supported by the
available equipment and upon other factors both technical and
economic.
Each technique requires the provisioning of some subscriber-specific
information on the customer edge device. The provisioning may be by
DHCP or by some other method. This document is indifferent to the
specific provisioning technique used, but assumes a deployment in
which that information is managed by AAA (Authentication,
Authorization, and Accounting) servers. It further assumes that this
information is delivered to intermediate network nodes for onward
provisioning using the Diameter protocol [RFC6733].
As described below, in the particular case where the Light Weight
IPv4 Over IPv6 (LW4o6) [I-D.ietf-softwire-lw4over6] transition method
has been deployed, per-subscriber-site information almost identical
to that passed to the subscriber site [I-D.ietf-softwire-map-dhcp] or
collected from it [I-D.fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt] also needs to
be delivered to the border router serving that site. The Diameter
protocol may be used for this purpose too.
This document analyzes the information required to configure the
customer edge equipment for the following set of transition methods:
o Dual-Stack Lite [RFC6333],
o Light Weight IPv4 Over IPv6 (LW4over6)
[I-D.ietf-softwire-lw4over6], and
o Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP-E)
[I-D.ietf-softwire-map].
On the basis of that analysis it specifies a number of attribute-
value pairs (AVPs) to allow the necessary subscriber-site-specific
configuration information to be carried in Diameter.
This document is intended to be complementary to documents such as
[RFC6519], [I-D.sun-softwire-lw4over6-radext], and
[I-D.ietf-softwire-map-radius] which provide RADIUS attributes to
carry similar configuration information for the respective transition
methods. Reconciliation of the present document with these other
documents is a work in progress.
1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
The abbreviation "CE" denotes the equipment at the customer edge that
terminates the customer end of an IPv6 transitional tunnel. This
will usually be a router, but could be a host directly connected to
the network.
The term "tunnel source address" is used to denote the IPv6 source
address used in the outer header of packets sent from the CE through
an LW4over6 transitional tunnel to the border router.
2. Description of the Parameters Required By Each Transition Method
This section reviews the parameters that need to be provisioned for
each of the transition methods listed above. This enumeration
provides the justification for the AVPs defined in the next section.
Since two of the three transition methods dealt with here are works
in progress, this section is subject to modification in future
versions.
A means is required to indicate which transition method(s) a given
subscriber is allowed to use. The approach taken in this document is
to specify grouped AVPs specific to LW4over6 and MAP-E. The operator
can control which of these two transition methods a given subscriber
uses by ensuring that AAA passes only the grouped AVP relevant to
that method. A grouped AVP is unnecessary for Dual-Stack Lite, since
(as the next section indicates) AAA has to provide only one
parameter. Hence the absence of either of the grouped AVPs indicates
that the subscriber equipment will use Dual-Stack Lite.
2.1. Parameters For Dual-Stack Lite
Dual-Stack Lite is documented in [RFC6333]. The Basic Bridging
BroadBand (B4) element at the customer premises needs to be
provisioned with the IPv6 address of the AFTR (border router).
Optionally, it could also be configured with the IPv4 address of the
B4 interface facing the tunnel, where the default value in the
absence of provisioning is 192.0.0.2 and valid values are 192.0.0.2
through 192.0.0.7. Provisioning this information through AAA is
problematic because it is most likely used in a case where multiple
B4 instances occupy the same device. This document therefore assumes
that the B4 interface address is determined by other means
(implementation-dependent or static assignment).
2.2. Light Weight IPv4 Over IPv6 (LW4over6)
Light Weight IPv4 Over IPv6 (LW4over6) is documented in
[I-D.ietf-softwire-lw4over6]. LW4over6 requires four parameters to
be provisioned to the customer equipment:
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
o IPv6 address of the border router.
o IPv6 prefix used by the CE to construct the tunnel source address.
In the terminology of [I-D.ietf-softwire-lw4over6], this is the
IPv6 Binding Prefix.
o an IPv4 address to be used on the external side of the CE; and
o if the IPv4 address is shared, a specification of the port set the
subscriber site is allowed to use.
As discussed in Section 4 of [I-D.ietf-softwire-lw4over6], it is
necessary to synchronize this configuration with corresponding per-
subscriber configuration at the border router. The border router
information consists of the same public IPv4 address and port set
parameters that are passed to the CE, bound together with the full
/128 IPv6 address (not just the Binding Prefix) configured as the
tunnel source address at the CE.
[I-D.fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt] proposes a means whereby a
DHCPv6 server can influence the choice of this address and collect it
from the CE. Depending on the provisioning architecture deployed in
a given network, it is possible that the tunnel source address is
passed to AAA as an intermediate step before the binding information
is passed on to the border router.
2.3. Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP-E)
Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP-E) is described
in [I-D.ietf-softwire-map]. MAP-E requires the provisioning of the
following per-subscriber information at the customer edge device:
o the IPv6 address of one or more border routers;
o the unique End-user IPv6 prefix for the customer edge device;
o the Basic Mapping Rule for the customer edge device. This
includes the following parameters:
* the rule IPv6 prefix and length;
* the rule IPv4 prefix and length;
* the number of "Extended Address" (EA) bits included in the End-
user IPv6 prefix;
* of those Extended Address bits, the number that precede the
port set identifier. The default value is 6.
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
* optionally, a specification of the port set the subscriber site
is allowed to use if the EA bits do not convey it (final case
of Section 5.2 of the MAP-E document).
o whether the device is to operate in mesh or hub-and-spoke mode;
o in mesh mode only, zero or more Forwarding Mapping Rules,
described by the same set of parameters as the Basic Mapping Rule;
As indicated in Section 5, bullet 1 of the MAP-E document, a MAP CE
can be provisioned with multiple End-user IPv6 prefixes, each
associated with its own Basic Mapping Rule. This does not change the
basic requirement for representation of the corresponding information
in the form of Diameter AVPs, but adds a potential requirement for
multiple instances of both types of AVP to be present.
The border router needs to be configured with the superset of the
Mapping Rules passed to the customer sites it serves. Since this
requirement does not require direct coordination with CE
configuration in the way LW4over6 does, it is out of scope of the
present document.
2.4. Summary and Discussion
It appears that one item is common to the different transition
methods and the corresponding AVP to carry it can be reused:
o a representation of the IPv6 address of a border router;
[RFC6519] sets a precedent for representation of the IPv6 address of
a border router as an FQDN. This can be dereferenced to one or more
IP addresses by the provisioning system before being passed to the
customer equipment, or left as an FQDN as it is in [RFC6334].
The remaining requirements are transition-method-specific:
o for LW4over6, a representation of a binding between either the
IPv6 Binding Prefix or a full /128 IPv6 address, a public IPv4
address, and a port set identifier;
o for MAP-E, a representation of a Mapping Rule;
o for MAP-E, an indication of whether mesh mode or hub-and-spoke
mode is to be used.
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
3. Derived AVP Data Formats: AddressOrPrefix
The above requirements involve IP addresses and prefixes in a number
of contexts. To simplify specification of these attributes, this
section defines a new derived AVP data format, AddressOrPrefix,
according to the rules given in Section 4.3 of [RFC6733].
AddressOrPrefix
The AddressOrPrefix data format is an extension of the Address
data format defined in Section 4.3.1 of [RFC6733]. Like the
Address data format, it is derived from the OctetString basic AVP
format. As well as an AddressType, it contains a PrefixLength
field. The detailed specification is as follows:
* As with the Address AVP, the first two octets represent the
AddressType, which contains an Address Family, defined in
[IANAADFAM].
* The next two octets are interpreted as a 16-bit unsigned
integer representing the PrefixLength. Valid values of
PrefixLength are from 0 to 32 for IPv4 and from 0 to 128 for
IPv6. The value 0 is included in each range to allow for
presentation of a "null prefix", the meaning of which must be
defined by applications that use AVPs based on the
AddressOrPrefix data format.
* The remaining octets present the prefix or address, most
significant octet first. If the prefix does not extend to an
octet boundary, the low-order bits of the final octet are
padded with zeroes.
4. Attribute-Value Pair Definitions
This section provides the specifications for the AVPs needed to meet
the requirements summarized in Section 2.4. Within the context of
their usage, all of these AVPs MUST have the M bit set and the V bit
cleared.
4.1. Border-Router-Name AVP
Following on the precedent set by [RFC6334] and [RFC6519], this
document identifies a border router using an FQDN rather than an
address. The Border-Router-Name AVP (AVP Code TBD01) is of type
OctetString. The rules for encoding the FQDN are the same as those
for the FQDN variant of the derived type DiameterIdentity
(Section 4.3.1 of [RFC6733]).
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
4.2. Tunnel-Source-Pref-Or-Addr AVP
The Tunnel-Source-Pref-Or-Addr AVP (AVP Code TBD02) is of type
AddressOrPrefix. It conveys either a prefix or a full address that
is configured as the tunnel source address on the CE. Within the
scope of application of this document it is intended for use to
convey the LW4over6 Binding Prefix from AAA to the provisioning
system or to carry a full IPv6 tunnel source address that has been
collected from the CE, either from the provisioning system to AAA or
from AAA to the border router. This AVP is defined separately from
the LW4over6-Binding AVP (which includes it) to provide flexibility
in the transport of the tunnel source address from the provisioning
system to AAA.
The Tunnel-Endpoint-Pref-Or-Addr AVP
4.3. Port-Set-Identifier
The Port-Set-Identifier AVP (AVP Code TBD03) is a structured
OctetString with four octets of data, hence a total AVP length of 12.
The description of the structure which follows refers to quantities
illustrated in Figure 9, Appendix B of [I-D.ietf-softwire-map]. The
derivation of port numbers from these parameters is described in that
appendix.
o The first (high-order) octet is the Offset field. It is
interpreted as an 8-bit unsigned integer giving the offset 'a'
from the beginning of a port number to the beginning of the port
set identifier (PSID) to which that port belongs. Valid values
are from 0 to 15.
o The next octet, the PSIDLength, is also interpreted as an 8-bit
unsigned integer and gives the length in bits of the port set
identifier (PSID). This corresponds to the value 'k' in the
figure referred to above. Valid values are from 1 to (16 - a).
o The final two octets constitute the PSIDValue field and are
interpreted as a 16-bit unsigned integer. They give the value of
the PSID itself, right-justified within the field. That is, the
value of the PSID occupies the 'k' lowest-order bits of the
PSIDValue field.
4.4. LW4over6-Binding
The LW4over6-Binding AVP (AVP Code TBD04) is of type Grouped. It
contains the elements of configuration that constitute the binding
between an LW4over6 tunnel and IPv4 packets sent through that tunnel.
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
LW4over6-Binding ::= < AVP Header: TBD04 >
{ Tunnel-Source-Pref-Or-Addr }
{ LW4over6-External-IPv4-Addr }
[ Port-Set-Identifier ]
*[ AVP ]
Figure 1
The Tunnel-Source-Pref-Or-Addr AVP is defined in Section 4.2 and
provides either the Binding Prefix or the full IPv6 tunnel source
address. This AVP MUST be present.
The LW4over6-External-IPv4-Addr AVP (AVP Code TBD05) is of type
AddressOrPrefix. Within the LW4over6-Binding AVP, it provides the
external IPv4 address used as the source address for packets outgoing
from the CE through the LW4over6 tunnel associated with the given
binding, or destination address for incoming packets. This AVP MUST
be present.
The Port-Set-Identifier AVP is defined in Section 4.3. It identifies
the specific set of ports assigned to the LW4over6 tunnel. This AVP
MUST be present except when 1-1 mapping mode is being provisioned,
when it MUST NOT be present.
4.5. MAP-E-Attributes
The MAP-E-Attributes AVP (AVP Code TBD06) is of type Grouped. It
contains the configuration data identified in Section 2.3, for a
single MAP domain. If a CE belongs to more than one MAP domain, AAA
will have to provide an instance of the MAP-E-Attributes AVP for each
domain.
MAP-E-Attributes ::= < AVP Header: TBD06 >
1*{ Border-Router-Name }
1*{ MAP-Mapping-Rule }
[ MAP-Mesh-Mode ]
[ MAP-End-User-IPv6-Prefix ]
*[ AVP ]
Figure 2
The Border-Router-Name AVP is defined in Section 4.1. It provides
the FQDN of a MAP border relay at the edge of the MAP domain to which
the containing MAP-E-Attributes AVP relates. The provisioning system
will typically resolve this FQDN into one or more IPv6 addresses
before passing it to the CE. At least one instance of this AVP MUST
be present.
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
The MAP-Mapping-Rule AVP is defined in Section 4.6. At least one
instance of this AVP MUST be present. If the MAP-E domain supports
mesh mode, additional MAP-Mapping-Rule instances MAY be present. If
the MAP-E domain is operating in hub-and-spoke mode, additional MAP-
Mapping-Rule instances MUST NOT be present.
The MAP-Mesh-Mode AVP (AVP Code TBD07) is of type OctetString but has
no data. Hence the AVP length is always 8. The absence of the mesh
mode indicator attribute indicates that the CE is required to operate
in hub- and-spoke mode.
The MAP-End-User-IPv6-Prefix AVP (AVP Code TBD08) is of type
AddressOrPrefix. Within the MAP-E-Attributes AVP, it provides the
end- user IPv6 prefix assigned to the CE for the MAP domain to which
the containing MAP-E-Attributes AVP relates. This attribute is
optional because, depending on deployment, the end-user IPv6 prefix
may be provided by AAA or by another support system.
4.6. MAP-Mapping-Rule
The MAP-Mapping-Rule AVP (AVP Code TBD09) is of type Grouped, and is
used only in conjunction with MAP-based transition methods (MAP-E and
potentially 4rd and MAP-T). Mapping rules are required both by the
MAP border relay and by the CE. The components of the MAP-Mapping-
Rule AVP provide the contents of a mapping rule as described in
Section 2.3.
The syntax of the MAP-Mapping-Rule AVP is as follows:
MAP-Mapping-Rule ::= < AVP Header: TBD09 >
{ Rule-IPv4-Addr-Or-Prefix }
{ Rule-IPv6-Prefix }
{ EA-Field-Length }
[ Port-Set-Identifier ]
*[ AVP ]
Figure 3
The Rule-IPv4-Addr-Or-Prefix AVP (AVP Code TBD10) is of type
AddressOrPrefix. The prefix length can range from 0 to 32, based on
the different cases identified in Section 5.2 of
[I-D.ietf-softwire-map]. A prefix length of 0 indicates that the
entire IPv4 address or prefix is coded in the Extended Address (EA)
bits of the end-user IPv6 prefix rather than in the mapping rule.
This AVP MUST be present.
The Rule-IPv6-Prefix AVP (AVP Code TBD11) is also of type
AddressOrPrefix. The prefix length MUST be less than or equal to the
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
length of the prefix in the MAP-End-User-IPv6-Prefix AVP contained in
the same instance of the MAP-E-Attributes AVP as the MAP-Mapping-Rule
AVP instance to which the Rule-IPv6-Prefix AVP belongs. The Rule-
IPv6-Prefix AVP MUST be present.
The EA-Field-Length AVP (AVP Code TBD12) is of type Unsigned32.
Valid values range from 0 to 48. See Section 5.2 of
[I-D.ietf-softwire-map] for a description of the use of this
parameter in deriving IPv4 address and port number configuration.
This AVP MUST be present.
The Port-Set-Identifier AVP is defined in Section 4.3. It MUST be
present if the value of EA-Field-Length AVP is 0, and is redundant
(SHOULD NOT be present) otherwise.
5. Acknowledgements
Tom Taylor performed work on earlier versions of this document with
funding from Huawei Technologies.
6. IANA Considerations
This memo requests to IANA to register the following Diameter AVP
codes:
+-------+-----------------------------+---------------+
| Code | Attribute Name | Reference |
+-------+-----------------------------+---------------+
| TBD01 | Border-Router-Name | This document |
| TBD02 | Tunnel-Source-Pref-Or-Addr | This document |
| TBD03 | Port-Set-Identifier | This document |
| TBD04 | LW4over6-Binding | This document |
| TBD05 | LW4over6-External-IPv4-Addr | This document |
| TBD06 | MAP-E-Attributes | This document |
| TBD07 | MAP-Mesh-Mode | This document |
| TBD08 | MAP-End-User-IPv6-Prefix | This document |
| TBD09 | MAP-Mapping-Rule | This document |
| TBD10 | Rule-IPv4-Addr-Or-Prefix | This document |
| TBD11 | Rule-IPv6-Prefix | This document |
| TBD12 | EA-Field-Length | This document |
+-------+-----------------------------+---------------+
Table 1
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
7. Security Considerations
To come.
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-softwire-lw4over6]
Cui, Y., Sun, Q., Boucadair, M., Tsou, T., Lee, Y., and I.
Farrer, "Lightweight 4over6: An Extension to the DS-Lite
Architecture (work in progress)", March 2014.
[I-D.ietf-softwire-map]
Troan, O., Dec, W., Li, X., Bao, C., Matsushima, S.,
Murakami, T., and T. Taylor, "Mapping of Address and Port
with Encapsulation (MAP) (work in progress)", January
2014.
[IANAADFAM]
IANA, "Address Family Numbers",
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/address-family-numbers>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC6333] Durand, A., Droms, R., Woodyatt, J., and Y. Lee, "Dual-
Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4
Exhaustion", RFC 6333, August 2011.
[RFC6733] Fajardo, V., Arkko, J., Loughney, J., and G. Zorn,
"Diameter Base Protocol", RFC 6733, October 2012.
8.2. Informative References
[I-D.fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt]
Farrer, I., Sun, Q., and Y. Cui, "DHCPv4 over DHCPv6
Source Address Option (Work in progress)", June 2014.
[I-D.ietf-softwire-map-dhcp]
Mrugalski, T., Troan, O., Farrer, I., Perrault, S., Dec,
W., Bao, C., Yeh, L., and X. Deng, "DHCPv6 Options for
configuration of Softwire Address and Port Mapped Clients
(Work in progress)", March 2014.
[I-D.ietf-softwire-map-radius]
Jiang, S., Fu, Y., Liu, B., and P. Deacon, "RADIUS
Attribute for MAP (Work in progress)", June 2014.
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
[I-D.sun-softwire-lw4over6-radext]
Xie, C., Sun, Q., Sun, Q., Zhou, C., Tsou, T., and Z. Liu,
"Radius Extension for Lightweight 4over6 (Work in
progress)", March 2014.
[RFC2131] Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC
2131, March 1997.
[RFC2865] Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson,
"Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC
2865, June 2000.
[RFC3315] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.,
and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003.
[RFC4607] Holbrook, H. and B. Cain, "Source-Specific Multicast for
IP", RFC 4607, August 2006.
[RFC6052] Bao, C., Huitema, C., Bagnulo, M., Boucadair, M., and X.
Li, "IPv6 Addressing of IPv4/IPv6 Translators", RFC 6052,
October 2010.
[RFC6334] Hankins, D. and T. Mrugalski, "Dynamic Host Configuration
Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Option for Dual-Stack Lite",
RFC 6334, August 2011.
[RFC6519] Maglione, R. and A. Durand, "RADIUS Extensions for Dual-
Stack Lite", RFC 6519, February 2012.
Authors' Addresses
Cathy Zhou
Huawei Technologies
Bantian, Longgang District
Shenzhen 518129
P.R. China
Email: cathy.zhou@huawei.com
T. Taylor
PT Taylor Consulting
Ottawa
Canada
Email: tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft AVPs For 4over6 CE Provisioning July 2014
Qiong Sun
China Telecom
P.R.China
Phone: 86 10 58552936
Email: sunqiong@ctbri.com.cn
M. Boucadair
France Telecom
Rennes 35000
France
Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Zhou, et al. Expires January 22, 2015 [Page 14]