Kerberos Cryptosystem Negotiation Extension
draft-zhu-kerb-enctype-nego-04
Yes
(Sam Hartman)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Ted Hardie)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-01-30)
Unknown
KDC should be defined where first used (line 1 of the Introduction). At the end of section 3: The server MAY ignore the preference order indicated by the client. The policy by which the client or the server chooses an enctype (i.e., how the preference order for the supported enctypes is selected) is a local matter. Would it be useful to observe that this would actually allow a local decision to prefer weaker security than chosen by the KDC?
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-01-30)
Unknown
In the Abstract: s/Kerberos protocol/Kerberos protocol as defined in RFC 4120/
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown