Moving Undeployed TCP Extensions to Historic and Informational Status -- An addition to RFC 6247
draft-zimmermann-tcpm-undeployed-01

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2015-01-30 (latest revision 2014-07-29)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-zimmermann-tcpm-undeployed-01.txt

Abstract

This document reclassifies several TCP extensions that have either been superceded or never seen widespread use to Historic status. The affected RFCs are RFC 675, RFC 721, RFC 879, RFC 1078, and RFC 6013. Additionally, it reclassifies RFC 813, RFC 814, RFC 816, RFC 817, RFC 872, RFC 896, and RFC 964 to Informational status. Most of those RFCs are today part of RFC 1122.

Authors

Alexander Zimmermann (alexander.zimmermann@netapp.com)
Wesley Eddy (wes@mti-systems.com)
Lars Eggert (lars@netapp.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)