%% You should probably cite draft-zimmermann-tcpm-undeployed-01 instead of this revision.
@techreport{zimmermann-tcpm-undeployed-00,
    number =    {draft-zimmermann-tcpm-undeployed-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zimmermann-tcpm-undeployed/00/},
    author =    {Alexander Zimmermann and Wesley Eddy and Lars Eggert},
    title =     {{Moving Undeployed TCP Extensions to Historic and Informational Status -- An addition to RFC 6247}},
    pagetotal = 5,
    year =      2014,
    month =     jul,
    day =       2,
    abstract =  {This document reclassifies several TCP extensions that have either been superceded or never seen widespread use to Historic status. The affected RFCs are RFC 675, RFC 761, RFC 721, RFC 813, RFC 816, RFC 879, RFC 896, RFC 6013. Additionally, it reclassifies RFC 814, RFC 817, RFC 872, RFC 964, RFC 1078 to Informational status.},
}