Bitmask Route Target
draft-zzhang-idr-bitmask-route-target-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Zhaohui Zhang , Srihari Sangli , Jeffrey Haas | ||
| Last updated | 2021-01-13 (latest revision 2020-07-12) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-zzhang-idr-bitmask-route-target-00.txt
Abstract
This document specifies a new type of Route Target called Bitmask Route Target as a BGP Community Container. The key element of a Bitmask Route Target is a Bitmask. Two Bitmask Route Targets are considered equivalent for the purpose of controlling route propagation (via Route Target Constraints) and importation if the result of logical "AND" operation of the Bitmask of the two is non- zero.
Authors
Zhaohui Zhang
(zzhang@juniper.net)
Srihari Sangli
(ssangli@juniper.net)
Jeffrey Haas
(jhaas@juniper.net)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)