Extended Communities Derived from Route Targets
draft-zzhang-idr-rt-derived-community-00
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Replaced".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang | ||
| Last updated | 2021-02-22 | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-idr-rt-derived-community | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-zzhang-idr-rt-derived-community-00
idr Z. Zhang
Internet-Draft Juniper Networks
Intended status: Informational February 22, 2021
Expires: August 26, 2021
Extended Communities Derived from Route Targets
draft-zzhang-idr-rt-derived-community-00
Abstract
This document describes a way to derive an Extended Community from a
Route Target and its use cases.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 26, 2021.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Zhang Expires August 26, 2021 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft RT-derived ECs February 2021
1. Introduction
Consider a VPN with 10 PEs. A Route Target (say RT1) [RFC4360] is
configured for the VPN and all PEs will import VPN routes with RT1
attached. The RT is an Extended Community (say EC1), with its sub-
type being 0x02. While RT1 and EC1 have the same encoding, typically
when we mention a Route Target, its property of being able to control
the route propagation and importation is implied. When we just
mention an Extended Community, that property is not implied.
Now consider that another BGP route needs to be imported by some but
not all those PEs. The route could be of any SAFI/type (does not
need to be a VPN prefix), but it needs to be associated with the VPN
on those importing PEs. The exact meaning of "association" here does
not matter, but the key is that those PEs need to know that the route
is related to that VPN.
To control the propagation to and importation by those PEs, a
different Route Target (say RT3) is attached to the route. For those
PE to associate the route with the VPN, an Extended Community (say
EC2) is attached. Even though RT1/EC1 is already tied to the VPN,
EC2 needs to be different from RT1/EC1, because if EC1 was used, the
route would be propagated to and imported by all the 10 PEs. EC2
cannot be the same as RT3 either, because there could be other routes
to be propagated to and imported by those same set of PEs yet those
other routes are not related to the VPN.
While EC2 can be any Extended Community (that is not a RT) configured
on the originating and receiving PEs to map it to the VPN, it is
convenient if EC2 is derived from the RT1/EC1, e.g. the sub-type of
RT1/EC1 is changed to a new known value while everything else remains
the same. We call this a Route Target derived Extended Community, or
RT-derived EC. A new sub-type is assigned specifically for this
purpose (see IANA considerations).
This document is for information only. Any protol/feature that can
take advantages of the convenience of generic RT-derived ECs may use
them, or not use them at its own discretion.
2. Use Cases
The following are a few examples of use cases. To reiterate, these
are example scenarios where generic RT-derived ECs could be used
(when the routes to which they are attached provide enough context).
It is not the intention of this document to mandate that it must be
used.
Zhang Expires August 26, 2021 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft RT-derived ECs February 2021
2.1. EVPN EVI-RT Extended Community
Section 9.5 "EVI-RT Extended Community" of
[I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy] describes a situation similar to
the above. As a solution, four EVPN specific EVI-RT ECs are defined,
each mapping to a type of Route Target for the corresponding EVPN
instance.
As a theoretical alternative, a RT-derived EC described in this
document could be used instead - just derive a generic EC from the
EVI RT. Note that this document does not attempt to change the
existing procedures in [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy], but
merely use it for illustration purposes.
2.2. Leaf Discovery with Controller Signaled BGP-MVPN
In Section 2 "Alternative to BGP-MVPN" of
[I-D.ietf-bess-bgp-multicast-controller], BGP MCAST-TREE SAFI
signaling can be used for a controller to program multicast
forwarding state in VRFs of ingress/egress PEs, instead of relying on
distributed BGP-MVPN signaling. For the controller to learn egress
PEs of a VPN customer multicast tree (so that it can build/find a
corresponding provider tunnel), egress PEs signal leaf information to
the controller via Leaf Auto-Discovery routes. The routes carry a
Route Target for the controller (so that only the controller receives
them), and an EC derived from the VPN's Route Target (so that the
controller knows which VPN they are for).
3. Security Considerations
To be provided.
4. IANA Considerations
This document requests IANA to assign a new sub-type "RT-derived-EC"
from the following registries:
o Transitive Two-Octet AS-Specific Extended Community Sub-Types
o Transitive Four-Octet AS-Specific Extended Community Sub-Types
o Transitive IPv4-Address-Specific Extended Community Sub-Types
o Transitive IPv6-Address-Specific Extended Community Sub-Types
o Non-Transitive Opaque Extended Community Sub-Types
o EVPN Extended Community Sub-Types
Zhang Expires August 26, 2021 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft RT-derived ECs February 2021
The same value is preferred across these registries.
If and when additional Extended Community types are defined with a
Route Target sub-type, the "RT-derived-EC" sub-type may also be
registered for those types, preferably with the same value. With
that consideration, it is preferred that the sub-type value is
assigned from the higher end of the "first come first serve" area, to
increase the probability of assigning the same value for future types
of Extended Communities with Route Target sub-type.
5. Acknowledgements
The authors thank Jeff Haas for his valuable comments and
suggestions.
6. References
6.1. Normative References
[RFC4360] Sangli, S., Tappan, D., and Y. Rekhter, "BGP Extended
Communities Attribute", RFC 4360, DOI 10.17487/RFC4360,
February 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4360>.
6.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-bess-bgp-multicast-controller]
Zhang, Z., Raszuk, R., Pacella, D., and A. Gulko,
"Controller Based BGP Multicast Signaling", draft-ietf-
bess-bgp-multicast-controller-05 (work in progress),
September 2020.
[I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy]
Sajassi, A., Thoria, S., Drake, J., and W. Lin, "IGMP and
MLD Proxy for EVPN", draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-
proxy-06 (work in progress), January 2021.
Author's Address
Zhaohui Zhang
Juniper Networks
Email: zzhang@juniper.net
Zhang Expires August 26, 2021 [Page 4]