Network Working Group M. Andrews
Internet-Draft Internet Systems Consortium
Expires: June 26, 2006 S. Weiler
SPARTA, Inc.
December 23, 2005
The DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) DNS Resource Record
draft-andrews-dlv-dns-rr-01
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on June 26, 2006.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
Abstract
This document defines a new DNS Resource Record, called the DNSSEC
Lookaside Validation (DLV) RR, for publishing DNSSEC trust anchors
outside of the DNS delegation chain.
1. Introduction
Andrews & Weiler Expires June 26, 2006 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft DLV Resource Record December 2005
DNSSEC [1] [2] [3] authenticates DNS data by building public-key
signature chains along the DNS delegation chain from a trust anchor,
ideally a trust anchor for the DNS root.
This document defines a new resource record for publishing such trust
anchors outside of the DNS's normal delegation chain. Use of these
records by DNSSEC validators is outside the scope of this document,
but it is expected that these records will help resolvers validate
DNSSEC-signed data from zones whose ancestors either aren't signed or
refuse to publish DS records for their children.
2. DLV Resource Record
The DLV resource record has exactly the same wire and presentation
formats as the DS resource record, defined in RFC4034 Section 5. It
uses the same IANA-assigned values in the algorithm and digest type
fields as the DS record. (Those IANA registries are known as the
"DNS Security Algorithm Numbers" and "DS RR Type Algorithm Numbers"
registries.)
The DLV record is a normal DNS record type without any special
processing requirements. In particular, the DLV record does not
inherit any of the special processing or handling requirements of the
DS record type (described in section 3.1.4.1 of RFC4035). Unlike the
DS record, the DLV record may not appear on the parent's side of a
zone cut. A DLV record may, however, appear at the apex of a zone.
3. Security Considerations
For authoritative servers and resolvers that do not attempt to use
DLV RRs as part of DNSSEC validation, there are no particular
security concerns -- DLV RRs are just like any other DNS data.
Software using DLV RRs as part of DNSSEC validation will almost
certainly want to impose constraints on their use, but those
constraints are best left to be described by the documents that more
fully describe the particulars of how the records are used. At a
minimum, it would be unwise to use the records without some sort of
cryptographic authentication. More likely than not, DNSSEC itself
will be used to authenticate the DLV RRs. Depending on how a DLV RR
is used, failure to properly authenticate it could lead to
significant additional security problems including failure to detect
spoofed DNS data.
RFC4034 Section 8 describes security considerations specific to the
DS RR. Those considerations are equally applicable to DLV RRs. Of
Andrews & Weiler Expires June 26, 2006 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft DLV Resource Record December 2005
particular note, the key tag field is used to help select DNSKEY RRs
efficiently, but it does not uniquely identify a single DNSKEY RR.
It is possible for two distinct DNSKEY RRs to have the same owner
name, the same algorithm type, and the same key tag. An
implementation that uses only the key tag to select a DNSKEY RR might
select the wrong public key in some circumstances.
For further discussion of the security implications of DNSSEC see
RFC4033, RFC4034, and RFC4035.
4. IANA Considerations
IANA has assigned DNS type code X to the DLV resource record from the
Specification Required portion of the DNS Resource Record Type
registry, as defined in [4].
The DLV resource record reuses the same algorithm and digest type
registries already used for the DS resource record, currently known
as the "DNS Security Algorithm Numbers" and "DS RR Type Algorithm
Numbers" registries.
5. Normative References
[1] Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S. Rose,
"DNS Security Introduction and Requirements", RFC 4033,
March 2005.
[2] Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S. Rose,
"Resource Records for the DNS Security Extensions", RFC 4034,
March 2005.
[3] Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S. Rose,
"Protocol Modifications for the DNS Security Extensions",
RFC 4035, March 2005.
[4] Eastlake, D., Brunner-Williams, E., and B. Manning, "Domain Name
System (DNS) IANA Considerations", BCP 42, RFC 2929,
September 2000.
Andrews & Weiler Expires June 26, 2006 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft DLV Resource Record December 2005
Authors' Addresses
Mark Andrews
Internet Systems Consortium
950 Charter St.
Redwood City, CA 94063
US
Email: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
Samuel Weiler
SPARTA, Inc.
7075 Samuel Morse Drive
Columbia, Maryland 21046
US
Email: weiler@tislabs.com
Andrews & Weiler Expires June 26, 2006 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft DLV Resource Record December 2005
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Andrews & Weiler Expires June 26, 2006 [Page 5]
