DNS Extenstions Working Group                                  R. Arends
Internet-Draft                                                   Nominet
Intended status: Experimental                                J. Schlyter
Expires: November 10, 2007                                      Kirei AB
                                                             May 9, 2007


    The DNSSEC Lookaside Validation Pointer (DLVPTR) Resource Record
                     draft-arends-dnsext-dlvptr-00

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on November 10, 2007.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

Abstract

   This document defines the DNSSEC Lookaside Validation Pointer
   (DLVPTR) Resource Record (RR), for publishing pointers to DNSSEC
   Lookaside Validation (DLV) records.







Arends & Schlyter       Expires November 10, 2007               [Page 1]


Internet-Draft               DLV Pointer RR                     May 2007


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.  DLVPTR Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   3.  The DLVPTR Resource Record  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     3.1.  The DLVPTR RDATA Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     3.2.  Presentation Format of the DLVPTR RR  . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   6.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
     6.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
     6.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   Appendix A.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements  . . . . . . . . . . 6




































Arends & Schlyter       Expires November 10, 2007               [Page 2]


Internet-Draft               DLV Pointer RR                     May 2007


1.  Introduction

   DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) [4] [2][5] is a method to publish
   Trust Anchors (TAs) for islands of security [3] outside the
   delegation chain.  This, in turn, has the potential for efficient TA
   management on the validator, as the validator can configure the TA
   for the DLV repository, instead of TAs for each island of security.

   Due to the design of DLV it is not efficient to have more than a few
   TAs for DLV repositories.  DLV requires the validator to send
   additional requests to each DLV repository for each response, for
   which there is no configured TA.

   This memo introduces a change to the design of DLV.  An island of
   security can publish a pointer (DLVPTR) to the DLV repository of
   choice.  When the validator has a configured TA for this DLV,
   additional requests will be send to just this DLV.

   This change allows configuration of multiple DLV TAs in a validator
   without significantly degrading response times.

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1].


2.  DLVPTR Processing

   A Security Aware Resolver sends requests with the DNSSEC-OK bit set,
   regardless of any configured TA.  It expects the zone at a configured
   TA to be secured, and thus responses to contain DNSSEC records.

   When a Security Aware Resolver has no TAs configured for a requested
   name, and has one or more DLV-TAs configured, and receives a response
   for that name containing DNSSEC records, it sends a request for a
   DLVPTR to the highest point in the delegation chain that contained
   DNSSEC records.

      DLV-ANCHOR && DLVPTR && DLV == record
      DLV-ANCHOR && (!DLV) == remove


3.  The DLVPTR Resource Record

3.1.  The DLVPTR RDATA Format

   The DLVPTR (type=TBD) record contains a domain name.




Arends & Schlyter       Expires November 10, 2007               [Page 3]


Internet-Draft               DLV Pointer RR                     May 2007


         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
         /                 DLVPTRDNAME                   /
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

   A DLVPTR record causes no additional section processing.  DLVPTR RRs
   are used in domains to point to some other location in the domain
   space.

3.2.  Presentation Format of the DLVPTR RR

   The RDATA of the presentation format of the DLVPTR resource record
   consists of one string (the domain name of the target DLV [2]), e.g.:

         example.net.  DLVPTR  xyzzy.dlv.arpa.


4.  Security Considerations


5.  IANA Considerations

   IANA needs to allocate a RR type code for DLVPTR from the standard RR
   type space (type 50 requested).


6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

   [1]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
        Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [2]  Andrews, M. and S. Weiler, "The DNSSEC Lookaside Validation
        (DLV) DNS Resource Record", RFC 4431, February 2006.

6.2.  Informative References

   [3]  Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S. Rose,
        "DNS Security Introduction and Requirements", RFC 4033,
        March 2005.

   [4]  Vixie, P. and M. Andrews, "DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)",
        ISC-TN 2006-1, April 2006.

   [5]  Weiler, S., "DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)",
        draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-02 (work in progress), March 2007.





Arends & Schlyter       Expires November 10, 2007               [Page 4]


Internet-Draft               DLV Pointer RR                     May 2007


Appendix A.  Acknowledgements

   The author gratefully acknowledges, in no particular order, the
   contributions of the following persons:
      Geoffrey Sisson


Authors' Addresses

   Roy Arends
   Nominet
   Sandford Gate
   Sandy Lane West
   Oxford  OX4 6LB
   United Kingdom

   Phone: +44 1865 332211
   Email: roy@nominet.org.uk


   Jakob Schlyter
   Kirei AB
   P.O. Box 53204
   Goteborg  SE-400 16
   Sweden

   Phone: +46 31 787 80 07
   Email: jakob@kirei.se























Arends & Schlyter       Expires November 10, 2007               [Page 5]


Internet-Draft               DLV Pointer RR                     May 2007


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.


Acknowledgment

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).





Arends & Schlyter       Expires November 10, 2007               [Page 6]