Network Working Group H. Chu Internet-Draft Symas Corp. Expires: November 4, 2006 May 3, 2006 A Schema for Logging the LDAP Protocol draft-chu-ldap-logschema-00.txt Status of this Memo By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This Internet-Draft will expire on November 4, 2006. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). Abstract In order to facilitate remote administration and auditing of LDAP server operation, it is desirable to provide the server's operational logs themselves as a searchable LDAP directory. These logs may also be used as a persistent change log to support various replication mechanisms. This document defines a schema that may be used to represent all of the requests that have been processed by an LDAP server. It may be used by various applications for auditing, flight recorder, replication, and other purposes. Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Syntaxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1. Control Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4. Attribute Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1. General Attribute Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.2. Request-specific Attribute Types . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5. Object Classes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.1. Basic Audit Object Classes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.2. Request-Specific Object Classes . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.3. Generic Container Class . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6. Discussion of Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6.1. AuditObject . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6.2. AuditContainer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 6.3. Request-Specific Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 7. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7.1. Audit Trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7.2. Add request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 7.3. Modify request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 7.4. Rename request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 7.5. Delete request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 7.6. Usage Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 9. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Appendix A. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . 24 Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 1. Introduction In a widely distributed network with multiple LDAP servers, it is desirable to be able to audit and monitor the operation of each server remotely, using the same tools that are normally used to interact with the LDAP servers. Using a standardized logging format in LDAP allows LDAP queries to be used to generate server usage statistics with little effort. This document describes a set of object classes that can be used to represent any LDAP operation. The object classes are intended to represent a complete record of all of the parameters of an operation. The log not only allows clients to see what operations were executed on a given server, but also to easily regenerate and re-issue a sequence of operations to aid in testing situations. The sequence of write operations recorded in the log can also be used by various replication mechanisms. Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 2. Conventions Imperative keywords defined in [RFC2119] are used in this document, and carry the meanings described there. Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 3. Syntaxes 3.1. Control Syntax A value of the Control syntax represents an LDAP Control as used by a client or server. It consists of the numeric OID of the Control, the Boolean criticality flag, and an optional OctetString containing the Control value. The definition given here merely repeats the definition of Controls in [RFC2251]. The Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1 [X680]) definition of this syntax is as follows: Control ::= SEQUENCE { controlType LDAPOID, criticality BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE, controlValue OCTET STRING OPTIONAL } The following is an LDAP syntax description [RFC2252] suitable for publication in the subschema. ( LOG_SCHEMA_SYN.1 DESC 'Control' ) Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 4. Attribute Types 4.1. General Attribute Types These attributes are common to all of the LDAP request records. ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT.1 NAME 'reqDN' DESC 'Target DN of request' EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .2 NAME 'reqStart' DESC 'Start time of request' EQUALITY generalizedTimeMatch ORDERING generalizedTimeOrderingMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .3 NAME 'reqEnd' DESC 'End time of request' EQUALITY generalizedTimeMatch ORDERING generalizedTimeOrderingMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .4 NAME 'reqType' DESC 'Type of request' EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .5 NAME 'reqSession' DESC 'Session ID of request' EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .6 NAME 'reqAuthzID' DESC 'Authorization ID of requestor' EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .7 NAME 'reqResult' DESC 'Result code of request' EQUALITY integerMatch ORDERING integerOrderingMatch Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .8 NAME 'reqMessage' DESC 'Error text of request' EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .9 NAME 'reqReferral' DESC 'Referrals returned for request' SUP labeledURI ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .10 NAME 'reqControls' DESC 'Request controls' EQUALITY objectIdentifierFirstComponentMatch SYNTAX LOG_SCHEMA_SYN.1 X-ORDERED 'VALUES' ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .11 NAME 'reqRespControls' DESC 'Response controls of request' EQUALITY objectIdentifierFirstComponentMatch SYNTAX LOG_SCHEMA_SYN.1 X-ORDERED 'VALUES' ) 4.2. Request-specific Attribute Types These attributes are specific to a single type of LDAP request. ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .12 NAME 'reqId' DESC 'ID of Request to Abandon' EQUALITY integerMatch ORDERING integerOrderingMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .13 NAME 'reqVersion' DESC 'Protocol version of Bind request' EQUALITY integerMatch ORDERING integerOrderingMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .14 NAME 'reqMethod' DESC 'Bind method of request' EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 SINGLE-VALUE ) Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .15 NAME 'reqAssertion' DESC 'Compare Assertion of request' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .16 NAME 'reqMod' DESC 'Modifications of request' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 EQUALITY octetStringMatch SUBSTR octetStringSubstringsMatch ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .17 NAME 'reqOld' DESC 'Old values of entry before request completed' EQUALITY octetStringMatch SUBSTR octetStringSubstringsMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .18 NAME 'reqNewRDN' DESC 'New RDN of request' EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .19 NAME 'reqDeleteOldRDN' DESC 'Delete old RDN' EQUALITY booleanMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .20 NAME 'reqNewSuperior' DESC 'New superior DN of request' EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .21 NAME 'reqScope' DESC 'Scope of request' EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .22 NAME 'reqDerefAliases' DESC 'Disposition of Aliases in request' EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .23 NAME 'reqAttrsOnly' Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 DESC 'Attributes and values of request' EQUALITY booleanMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .24 NAME 'reqFilter' DESC 'Filter of request' EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .25 NAME 'reqAttr' DESC 'Attributes of request' EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .26 NAME 'reqSizeLimit' DESC 'Size limit of request' EQUALITY integerMatch ORDERING integerOrderingMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .27 NAME 'reqTimeLimit' DESC 'Time limit of request' EQUALITY integerMatch ORDERING integerOrderingMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .28 NAME 'reqEntries' DESC 'Number of entries returned' EQUALITY integerMatch ORDERING integerOrderingMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 SINGLE-VALUE ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_AT .29 NAME 'reqData' DESC 'Data of extended request' EQUALITY octetStringMatch SUBSTR octetStringSubstringsMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40 SINGLE-VALUE ) Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 5. Object Classes 5.1. Basic Audit Object Classes This is the basic class containing attributes common to all of the LDAP requests. The following object classes all inherit from this class. ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .1 NAME 'auditObject' DESC 'OpenLDAP request auditing' SUP top STRUCTURAL MUST ( reqStart $ reqType $ reqSession ) MAY ( reqDN $ reqAuthzID $ reqControls $ reqRespControls $ reqEnd $ reqResult $ reqMessage $ reqReferral ) ) These object classes are used to aggregate read operations and write operations under common parent classes. ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .2 NAME 'auditReadObject' DESC 'OpenLDAP read request record' SUP auditObject STRUCTURAL MUST reqDN ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .3 NAME 'auditWriteObject' DESC 'OpenLDAP write request record' SUP auditObject STRUCTURAL MUST reqDN ) 5.2. Request-Specific Object Classes Each LDAP Request has its own object class containing all of the attributes needed to represent an instance of the request. ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .4 NAME 'auditAbandon' DESC 'Abandon operation' SUP auditObject STRUCTURAL MUST reqId ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .5 NAME 'auditAdd' DESC 'Add operation' SUP auditWriteObject STRUCTURAL MUST reqMod ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .6 NAME 'auditBind' DESC 'Bind operation' SUP auditObject STRUCTURAL MUST ( reqDN $ reqMethod $ reqVersion ) ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .7 NAME 'auditCompare' DESC 'Compare operation' SUP auditReadObject STRUCTURAL MUST reqAssertion ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .8 NAME 'auditDelete' DESC 'Delete operation' SUP auditWriteObject STRUCTURAL MAY reqOld ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .9 NAME 'auditModify' DESC 'Modify operation' SUP auditWriteObject STRUCTURAL MUST reqMod MAY reqOld ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .10 NAME 'auditModRDN' DESC 'ModRDN operation' SUP auditWriteObject STRUCTURAL MUST ( reqNewRDN $ reqDeleteOldRDN ) MAY ( reqNewSuperior $ reqOld ) ) Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .11 NAME 'auditSearch' DESC 'Search operation' SUP auditReadObject STRUCTURAL MUST ( reqScope $ reqDerefAliases $ reqAttrsonly ) MAY ( reqFilter $ reqAttr $ reqEntries $ reqSizeLimit $ reqTimeLimit ) ) ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .12 NAME 'auditExtended' DESC 'Extended operation' SUP auditObject STRUCTURAL MAY reqData ) 5.3. Generic Container Class This object class may be used for the parent entry of the log records. ( LOG_SCHEMA_OC .0 NAME 'auditContainer' DESC 'AuditLog container' SUP top STRUCTURAL MAY ( cn $ reqStart $ reqEnd ) ) Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 6. Discussion of Schema 6.1. AuditObject 1. reqDN: the distinguished name of the entry the request applies to. In the case of a ModRDN request, the reqDN gives the DN of the entry before it was modified. In the case of a Search request, the reqDN is the base DN of the search. Syntax: DN 2. reqStart: the time the request began on the server. reqEnd: the time the request completed on the server. The timestamps MUST have high enough resolution to ensure that the reqStart values are unique. The values for reqEnd MUST also be unique, although overlap of reqStart and reqEnd values is allowed. Servers SHOULD use one of reqStart or reqEnd as the log records' RDN. Either choice will allow records to be read in ascending order, although the two alternatives may produce different orders. In cases where the server clocks do not provide sufficient resolution, a simple counter may be used in the fractional seconds part to distinguish multiple events occurring within the same second. Syntax: GeneralizedTime 3. reqType: the type of request. One of: "abandon", "add", "bind", "compare", "delete", "modify", "modrdn", "search", or "extended{OID}". For Extended requests, the numeric objectIdentifier of the request is included in the string. Syntax: DirectoryString 4. reqSession: an implementation-defined value that is constant for all operations occurring within a Bind/Unbind sequence. Syntax: DirectoryString 5. reqAuthzID: the Authorization Identity used to perform the request. This will usually be the same as the reqDN of the Bind request with matching reqSession, but may be altered by various Controls and other processing. Syntax: DN 6. reqResult: the LDAP result code for a completed Request. This value is omitted for Requests which have no defined result (e.g. Abandon and Unbind) and also for Requests which were Abandoned or otherwise did not run to completion. Syntax: Integer 7. reqMessage: the textual error message accompanying the result, if any. Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 Syntax: DirectoryString 8. reqReferral: any referrals that accompanied the result. They are in the standard LDAP URI format [RFC2255]. Syntax: DirectoryString 9. reqControls: the set of Request Controls accompanying a request. reqRespControls: the set of Response Controls accompanying a request result. Each value represents a single Control. Note that since Controls are transmitted as an ordered Sequence, the X-ORDERED 'VALUES' [XORDERED]schema extension is used here to preserve their ordering. Syntax: Control 6.2. AuditContainer reqStart: the timestamp of the first (oldest) record in the log. reqEnd: the timestamp of the last (newest) record in the log. Syntax: GeneralizedTime 6.3. Request-Specific Discussion 6.3.1. Abandon reqId: the ID of a request to Abandon. Syntax: Integer 6.3.2. Bind reqVersion: the protocol version of the request. Syntax: Integer reqMethod: the Bind method. Either "Simple" or "SASL/<mechanism>" where "<mechanism>" is the specific SASL [RFC2222] mechanism requested. Syntax: DirectoryString 6.3.3. Compare reqAssertion: the Attribute Value Assertion (AVA) of the request. The AVA is encoded according to the rules in [RFC2254]. Syntax: DirectoryString 6.3.4. Rename reqNewRDN: the new RDN of the request. Syntax: DN Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 reqDeletedOldRDN: the deleteOldRDN value of the request. Syntax: Boolean reqNewSuperior: the new Superior DN of the request. Syntax: DN 6.3.5. Add and Modify reqMod: The modifications of the request. The encoding is defined by the following grammar, using the ABNF notation defined in [RFC0822]. mod = attr ":" modop attr = AttributeDescription from [RFC2251] modop = add / delete / replace / increment add = "+" sp value delete = "-" [ sp value ] replace = "=" [ sp value ] increment = "#" sp value sp = " " value = AttributeValue from [RFC2251] Note that Add requests will only use the add modop format. Syntax: OctetString reqOld: the previous values of a modified attribute. The encoding is of the form attr ":" sp value, using the same definitions as for reqMod above. Syntax: OctetString 6.3.6. Delete reqOld: the previous values of a deleted entry. The encoding is as given above. Syntax: OctetString 6.3.7. Search reqScope: the scope of the Search request. The possible values are as specified for the scope parameter in the LDAP URL format [RFC2255] and [SUBORD]. Currently one of "base", "one", "sub", or "subord". Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 Syntax: DirectoryString reqDerefAliases: the derefAliases parameter of the Search request. One of "never", "searching", "finding", or "always". Syntax: DirectoryString reqAttrsOnly: the typesOnly parameter of the request. Syntax: Boolean reqFilter: the Search filter, encoded according to [RFC2254]. Syntax: DirectoryString reqSizeLimit: the size limit of the request. reqTimeLimit: the time limit of the request. Syntax: Integer reqAttr: the specific attributes requested, if any. Syntax: DirectoryString reqEntries: the total number of entries returned for this request. Syntax: Integer 6.3.8. Extended reqData: the data accompanying the request, if any. Syntax: OctetString Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 7. Examples In the following examples the log records reside under the "cn=log" entry and are named by their "reqStart" attribute. 7.1. Audit Trail This is the set of log records produced for a session comprising a Simple Bind request, a Search request, and an Unbind: dn: reqStart=20051017081049.000000Z,cn=log objectClass: auditBind reqStart: 20051017081049.000000Z reqEnd: 20051017081049.000001Z reqType: bind reqSession: 0 reqAuthzID: reqDN: cn=manager,dc=example,dc=com reqResult: 0 reqVersion: 3 reqMethod: SIMPLE dn: reqStart=20051017081049.000002Z,cn=log objectClass: auditSearch reqStart: 20051017081049.000002Z reqEnd: 20051017081049.000003Z reqType: search reqSession: 0 reqAuthzID: cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com reqDN: dc=example,dc=com reqResult: 0 reqScope: one reqDerefAliases: never reqAttrsOnly: FALSE reqFilter: (objectClass=*) reqSizeLimit: -1 reqTimeLimit: -1 reqEntries: 3 dn: reqStart=20051017081049.000004Z,cn=log objectClass: auditObject reqStart: 20051017081049.000004Z reqEnd: 20051017081049.000005Z reqType: unbind reqSession: 0 reqAuthzID: cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 7.2. Add request This is a log record from adding an entry to the directory: dn: reqStart=20051017083706.000001Z,cn=log objectClass: auditAdd structuralObjectClass: auditAdd reqStart: 20051017083706.000001Z reqEnd: 20051017083706.000002Z reqType: add reqSession: 4 reqAuthzID: cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com reqDN: ou=People,dc=example,dc=com reqResult: 0 reqMod: objectClass:+ organizationalUnit reqMod: ou:+ People reqMod: description:+ A bunch of people will be here reqMod: structuralObjectClass:+ organizationalUnit reqMod: entryUUID:+ f16734aa-d334-1029-9290-cd8deceec6b0 reqMod: creatorsName:+ cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com reqMod: createTimestamp:+ 20051017083706Z reqMod: entryCSN:+ 20051017083706Z#000000#00#000000 reqMod: modifiersName:+ cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com reqMod: modifyTimestamp:+ 20051017083706Z Note that operational attributes written with the request are included in the log record. All of the static data associated with an entry will be exposed, allowing a replication client to get a full copy of the entry. 7.3. Modify request Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 This is a log record from modifying an entry in the directory: dn: reqStart=20051017083734.000010Z,cn=log objectClass: auditModify reqStart: 20051017083734.000010Z reqEnd: 20051017083734.000011Z reqType: modify reqSession: 1 reqAuthzID: cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com reqDN: ou=People,dc=example,dc=com reqResult: 0 reqMod: description:- reqMod: entryCSN:= 20051017083734Z#000003#00#000000 reqMod: modifiersName:= cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com reqMod: modifyTimestamp:= 20051017083734Z reqOld: description: A bunch of people will be here In this example the entire "description" attribute is deleted from the entry. Its original value is recorded in the "reqOld" attribute. Preserving the data allows the logs to be replayed both forwards and backwards. A client can run the log forward to bring a replica up to date, or run it backwards to undo a series of unintended operations. 7.4. Rename request This is a log record from renaming an entry in the directory: dn: reqStart=20051017083734.000018Z,cn=log objectClass: auditModRDN reqStart: 20051017083734.000018Z reqEnd: 20051017083734.000019Z reqType: modrdn reqSession: 1 reqAuthzID: cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com reqDN: ou=People,dc=example,dc=com reqResult: 0 reqNewRDN: ou=Populi reqDeleteOldRDN: TRUE 7.5. Delete request Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 This is a log record from deleting an entry in the directory: dn: reqStart=20051017083734.000020Z,cn=log objectClass: auditDelete reqStart: 20051017083734.000020Z reqEnd: 20051017083734.000021Z reqType: delete reqSession: 1 reqAuthzID: cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com reqDN: ou=Populi,dc=example,dc=com reqResult: 0 reqOld: ou: Populi reqOld: objectClass: organizationalUnit reqOld: structuralObjectClass: organizationalUnit reqOld: entryUUID: f16734aa-d334-1029-9290-cd8deceec6b0 reqOld: creatorsName: cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com reqOld: createTimestamp: 20051017083706Z reqOld: entryCSN: 20051017083734Z#000007#00#000000 reqOld: modifiersName: cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com reqOld: modifyTimestamp: 20051017083734Z 7.6. Usage Notes More information is accomodated in this specification than may be needed in typical use. Servers MAY implement only subsets of the attributes, or provide configuration mechanisms to reduce the range of operations covered in the log. Replication clients working from a full log can use a search filter with the terms "(&(objectClass=AuditWriteObject)(reqResult=0))" to filter out irrelevant records. The "reqOld" attribute will often contain redundant information; having an option to omit it from the logs may also be more suitable for some sites. Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 8. Security Considerations Servers implementing this scheme SHOULD NOT allow the logs to be generally readable. Extensive information about the existence and content of data, as well as the usage patterns associated with the data, will be present in the log and should only be made available to trusted users. The structure of the log does not prevent fine-grained access controls from being used, although the rules will be necessarily longer than they would be in the primary database. E.g., while a single rule to deny access to the userPassword attribute would suffice in the primary database, two rules would be needed in the log - one to deny access to the reqOld attribute with values userPassword:*, and one to deny access to the reqMod attribute with values userPassword:*. Servers implementing this scheme should not permit users to write directly to the log container object or any entries contained within. 9. Normative References [RFC0822] Crocker, D., "Standard for the format of ARPA Internet text messages", STD 11, RFC 822, August 1982. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2222] Myers, J., "Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL)", RFC 2222, October 1997. [RFC2251] Wahl, M., Howes, T., and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3)", RFC 2251, December 1997. [RFC2252] Wahl, M., Coulbeck, A., Howes, T., and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): Attribute Syntax Definitions", RFC 2252, December 1997. [RFC2254] Howes, T., "The String Representation of LDAP Search Filters", RFC 2254, December 1997. [RFC2255] Howes, T. and M. Smith, "The LDAP URL Format", RFC 2255, December 1997. [RFC3383] Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 3383, September 2002. Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 [SUBORD] Sermersheim, J., "Subordinate Subtree Search Scope for LDAP", a work in progress draft-sermersheim-ldap-subordinate-scope-00.txt. [X680] International Telecommunications Union, "Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation", ITU-T Recommendation X.680, July 2002. [XORDERED] Chu, H., "Ordered Values in LDAP", a work in progress draft-chu-ldap-orderedvalues-xx.txt. Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 Appendix A. IANA Considerations In accordance with [RFC3383] (what needs to be done here?) . Currently we are using OpenLDAP_Experimental = 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666 LOG_SCHEMA = OpenLDAP_Experimental.11.5 LOG_SCHEMA_AT = LOG_SCHEMA.1 LOG_SCHEMA_OC = LOG_SCHEMA.2 LOG_SCHEMA_SYN = LOG_SCHEMA.3 Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 Author's Address Howard Chu Symas Corp. 18740 Oxnard Street, Suite 313A Tarzana, California 91356 USA Phone: +1 818 757-7087 Email: hyc@symas.com Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft LDAP Log Schema May 2006 Intellectual Property Statement The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Disclaimer of Validity This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. Acknowledgment Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society. Chu Expires November 4, 2006 [Page 24]