Network Working Group M. Crispin
INTERNET DRAFT: IMAP UIDPLUS extension May 2005
Document: internet-drafts/draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-00.txt
Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - UIDPLUS extension
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that
any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is
aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she
becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of
BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as
Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
A revised version of this document will be submitted to the RFC
editor as an Informational Document for the Internet Community.
A revised version of this draft document will be submitted to the RFC
editor as a Proposed Standard for the Internet Community. Discussion
and suggestions for improvement are requested, and should be sent to
imapext@IMC.ORG. This document will expire before 18 November 2005.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
The UIDPLUS extension of the Internet Message Access Protocol [IMAP]
provides a set of features intended to reduce the amount of time and
resources used by some client operations. The features in UIDPLUS
are primarily intended for disconnected-use clients.
Conventions Used in this Document
In examples, "C:" and "S:" indicate lines sent by the client and
server respectively.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are
to be interpreted as described in [KEYWORDS].
Introduction and Overview
The UIDPLUS extension is present in any IMAP server implementation
which returns "UIDPLUS" as one of the supported capabilities to the
CAPABILITY command.
The UIDPLUS extension defines an additional command. In addition,
this document recommends new status response codes in IMAP which
SHOULD be returned by all server implementations, regardless of
whether or not the UIDPLUS extension is implemented.
The added facilities of the features in UIDPLUS are optimizations;
clients can provide the same functionality, albeit less efficiently,
by using facilities in the base protocol.
1. Additional Commands
The following command definition is an extension to [IMAP] section 6.4.
1.1 UID EXPUNGE Command
Arguments: message set
Data: untagged responses: EXPUNGE
Result: OK - expunge completed
NO - expunge failure (e.g. permission denied)
BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
The UID EXPUNGE command permanently removes from the currently
selected mailbox all messages that both have the \Deleted flag set
and have a UID that is included in the specified message set. If
a message either does not have the \Deleted flag set or is has a
UID that is not included in the specified message set, it is not
affected.
This command may be used to ensure that a replayed EXPUNGE command
does not remove any messages that have been marked as \Deleted
between the time that the user requested the expunge operation and
the time the server processes the command.
If the server does not support the UIDPLUS capability, the client
should fall back to using the STORE command to temporarily remove
the \Deleted flag from messages it does not want to remove. The
client could alternatively fall back to using the EXPUNGE command,
risking the unintended removal of some messages.
Example: C: A003 UID EXPUNGE 3000:3002
S: * 3 EXPUNGE
S: * 3 EXPUNGE
S: * 3 EXPUNGE
S: A003 OK UID EXPUNGE completed
2. Additional Response Codes
The following response codes are extensions to the response codes
defined in [IMAP] section 7.1. [IMAP] server implementations
SHOULD return these response codes.
A server which supports the UIDPLUS capability MUST return the
APPENDUID or COPYUID response code as part of the tagged OK response
to an APPEND or COPY command. The exception is if the destination
mailbox that has UIDNOTSTICKY status; in that case, the server MAY
omit the APPENDUID or COPYUID response as it is not meaningful.
If the server does not return these response codes, the client can
discover this information by selecting the destination mailbox.
The location of messages placed in the destination mailbox by COPY
or APPEND can be determined by using FETCH and/or SEARCH commands.
A server can determine that a mailbox does not support persistent
UIDs by observing that the UIDVALIDITY changes with multiple selects
of the mailbox.
APPENDUID
Followed by the UIDVALIDITY of the destination mailbox and the
UID assigned to the appended message in the destination mailbox,
indicates that the message has been appended to the destination
mailbox with that UID.
If the server also supports the [MULTIAPPEND] extension, then the
second value is a message set containing the UIDs assigned to the
appended messages, in the order they were assigned. This message
set may not contain extraneous UIDs or the symbol "*".
This response code is returned in a tagged OK response to the
APPEND command.
COPYUID
Followed by the UIDVALIDITY of the destination mailbox, a message
set containing the UIDs of the message(s) in the source mailbox
which were copied to the destination mailbox, and a message set
containing the UIDs assigned to the copied message(s) in the
destination mailbox, indicates that the message(s) have been
copied to the destination mailbox with the stated UID(s).
The source message set is in the order the message(s) were copied;
the destination message set corresponds to the source message set
and is in the order the UID(s) were assigned. Neither of the
message sets may contain extraneous UIDs or the symbol "*".
This response code is returned in a tagged OK response to the
COPY command.
UIDNOTSTICKY
The selected mailbox is supported by a mail store which does not
support persistent UIDs; that is, UIDVALIDITY will be different
each time the mailbox is selected. Consequently, APPEND or COPY
to this mailbox will not return an APPENDUID or COPYUID response
code.
This response code is returned in an untagged NO response to the
SELECT command.
Note: servers SHOULD NOT have any UIDNOTSTICKY mail stores.
This facility exists to support legacy mail stores in which
it is technically infeasible to support persistant UIDs.
This should be avoided when designing new mail stores.
Example: C: A003 APPEND saved-messages (\Seen) {297}
C: Date: Mon, 7 Feb 1994 21:52:25 -0800 (PST)
C: From: Fred Foobar <foobar@example.com>
C: Subject: afternoon meeting
C: To: mooch@example.com
C: Message-Id: <B27397-0100000@example.com>
C: MIME-Version: 1.0
C: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
C:
C: Hello Joe, do you think we can meet at 3:30 tomorrow?
C:
S: A003 OK [APPENDUID 38505 3955] APPEND completed
C: A004 COPY 2:4 meeting
S: A004 OK [COPYUID 38505 304,319:320 3956:3958] Done
C: A005 UID COPY 305:310 meeting
S: A005 OK No matching messages, so nothing copied
C: A006 COPY 2 funny
S: A006 OK Done
C: A007 SELECT funny
S: * 1 EXISTS
S: * 1 RECENT
S: * OK [UNSEEN 1] Message 1 is first unseen
S: * OK [UIDVALIDITY 3857529045] Validity for this session
S: * OK [UIDNEXT 2] Predicted next UID
S: * NO [UIDNOTSTICKY] Non-persistent UIDs
S: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft)
S: * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Deleted \Seen)] Limited
S: A007 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed
In this example, A003 and A004 demonstrate successful appending and
copying to a mailbox which returns the UIDs assigned to the messages.
A005 is an example in which no messages were copied; this is because
in A003 we see that message 2 had UID 305 and message 3 had UID 319;
therefore UIDs 305 through 310 do not exist (refer to section 2.3.1.1
of [IMAP] for further explanation). A006 is an example of a message
being copied that did not return a COPYUID; and as expected A007 shows
that the mail store containing that mailbox does not support persistent
UIDs.
5. Formal Syntax
The following syntax specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur
Form (ABNF) notation as specified in [ABNF].
The following modifications are made to the Formal Syntax in [IMAP]:
resp_code_apnd = "APPENDUID" SP nz_number SP append-uid
append-uid = uniqueid
resp_code_copy = "COPYUID" SP nz_number SP uid-set SP uid-set
uid_expunge = "UID" SP "EXPUNGE" SP sequence-set
uid-set = (uniqueid / uid-range) *("," uid-set)
uid-range = (uid-number ":" uid-number)
; two uniquid values and all values between
; these two regards of order.
; Example: 2:4 and 4:2 are equivalent.
Servers which support [MULTIAPPEND] will have the following extension
to the above rules:
append-uid =/ uid-set
Normative References
[ABNF] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, November 1997.
[IMAP] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol - Version
4rev1", RFC 3501, March 2003.
[KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC-2822] Resnick, P., "Internet Message Format", RFC 2822, April
2001.
Informative References
[MULTIAPPEND] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) -
MULTIAPPEND Extension", RFC 3502, March 2003.
7. Security Considerations
There are no known security issues with this extension.
Author's Address
Mark R. Crispin
Networks and Distributed Computing
University of Washington
4545 15th Avenue NE
Seattle, WA 98105-4527
Phone: (206) 543-5762
EMail: MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU
IPR Disclosure Acknowledgement
By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable
patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed,
and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
RFC 3668.
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
Director.
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided
on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE
REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES,
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT
THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR
ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Datatracker
draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-00
Internet-Draft
