Dynamic Host Configuration Working                            D. Hankins
Group                                                                ISC
Internet-Draft                                           August 11, 2008
Intended status: Standards Track
Expires: February 12, 2009


        Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Option for Softwires
                draft-dhankins-softwire-tunnel-option-01

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on February 12, 2009.

Abstract

   This document describes how Softwires configuration can be obtained
   via DHCPv6.












Hankins                 Expires February 12, 2009               [Page 1]


Internet-Draft              Softwires Option                 August 2008


Table of Contents

   1.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   3.  Softwires DHCPv6 Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   6.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements  . . . . . . . . . . 6









































Hankins                 Expires February 12, 2009               [Page 2]


Internet-Draft              Softwires Option                 August 2008


1.  Requirements Language

   In this document, the key words "MAY", "MUST, "MUST NOT", "OPTIONAL",
   "RECOMMENDED", "SHOULD", and "SHOULD NOT", are to be interpreted as
   described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 [RFC2119].


2.  Introduction

   Softwires [draft-droms-softwires-snat-01] is a method to extend IPv4
   access to an IPv6-only addressed host.  One of its key components is
   an IPv4-over-IPv6 tunnel, but a host will not know if the network it
   is attached to offers Softwires support, and if it did would not know
   the remote end of the tunnel to establish a connection.

   These are two separate pieces of information; 1) Should I shut down
   my dual-stack IPv4 side, and use the Softwires tunnel exclusively? 2)
   At what IPv6 address will I find the softwires service?

   These two questions can be answered with one DHCPv6 [RFC3315] option.

   DISCUSSION: It can be argued that if you inform a client it should
   perform Softwires, but fail to deliver an IPv6 tunnel endpoint, then
   its IPv4 access is certainly broken.  If you give the client an IPv6
   tunnel endpoint but fail to inform it that it must use Softwires
   support, then again its access is likely broken, or at least it isn't
   using Softwires as intended by the operator.  So the presence of a
   tunnel address also indicates the intent to use it.


3.  Softwires DHCPv6 Option

   The Softwires DHCPv6 Option is simply an IPv6 address.

   The Softwires Option Format follows:

        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |      OPTION_SOFTWIRES (TBD)    |           length (16)        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       |                           IPv6 Address                        |
       |                                                               |
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   The code for this option is TBD.  The length is precisely 16.  The



Hankins                 Expires February 12, 2009               [Page 3]


Internet-Draft              Softwires Option                 August 2008


   IPv6 Address field is an IPv6 address.

   The Softwires option MAY appear in the root scope of a DHCPv6 packet.
   It MUST NOT appear inside any IA_NA, IA_TA, IA_PD, IAADDR, or
   similar.

   If configured with a value, DHCPv6 servers MUST include the Softwires
   option if it appears on the client's OPTION_ORO.  A server SHOULD NOT
   include the option otherwise.

   A client that supports Softwires MUST include OPTION_SOFTWIRES on its
   OPTION_ORO.  There is no reasonable expectation that a server will
   reply with the Softwires option if it has not been requested.

   If the client receives a Softwires Option, it MUST verify the option
   length is precisely 16 octets, and ignore the option otherwise.
   Provided it is of valid length, the client SHOULD terminate or
   withdraw any DHCPv4 [RFC2131] configuration on the same interface.
   If DHCPv4 configuration has concluded, the client SHOULD perform a
   DHCPRELEASE as it tears down its IPv4 configuration.  The client
   SHOULD establish a Softwires tunnel to the included address.

   DISCUSSION: The author's best understanding of the current
   epistemology on IPv6 multihoming is that the client will have IPv6
   addresses on multiple different IPv6 prefixes.  If a host is
   multihomed, then, it is strange enough to wonder how DHCPv6
   configuration will work as most DHCPv6 clients will attach to only
   one DHCPv6 server.  It is even stranger to wonder how the client
   would react if all of its multiple homes wished to provide IPv4
   access via Softwires.  Would a client establish more than one tunnel?
   Perhaps this option should permit multiple IPv6 addresses?


4.  Security Considerations

   This document does not present any new security issues, but as with
   all DHCPv6-derived configuration state, it is completely possible
   that the configuration is being delivered by a third party (Man In
   The Middle).  As such, there is no basis to trust that the access the
   Softwires connection represents can be trusted, and it should not
   therefore bypass any security mechanisms such as IP firewalls.


5.  IANA Considerations

   IANA is requested to allocate one DHCPv6 Option code, referencing
   this document.




Hankins                 Expires February 12, 2009               [Page 4]


Internet-Draft              Softwires Option                 August 2008


6.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC2131]  Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol",
              RFC 2131, March 1997.

   [RFC3315]  Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.,
              and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
              IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003.

   [draft-droms-softwires-snat-01]
              Droms, R. and B. Haberman, "Softwires Network Address
              Translation", July 2008.


Author's Address

   David W. Hankins
   Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
   950 Charter Street
   Redwood City, CA  94063
   US

   Phone: +1 650 423 1307
   Email: David_Hankins@isc.org
























Hankins                 Expires February 12, 2009               [Page 5]


Internet-Draft              Softwires Option                 August 2008


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.











Hankins                 Expires February 12, 2009               [Page 6]