Internet-Draft | EAT Measured Component | February 2024 |
Frost, et al. | Expires 30 August 2024 | [Page] |
- Workgroup:
- Remote ATtestation ProcedureS
- Internet-Draft:
- draft-fft-rats-eat-measured-component-00
- Published:
- Intended Status:
- Standards Track
- Expires:
EAT Measured Component
Abstract
This document defines a "measured components" format that can be used with the EAT Measurements claim.¶
Discussion Venues
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.¶
Discussion of this document takes place on the Remote ATtestation ProcedureS Working Group mailing list (rats@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/.¶
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/thomas-fossati/draft-fft-rats-eat-measured-component.¶
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 30 August 2024.¶
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
1. Introduction
Section 4.2.16 of [I-D.ietf-rats-eat] defines a Measurements claim that:¶
-
"[c]ontains descriptions, lists, evidence or measurements of the software that exists on the entity or any other measurable subsystem of the entity."¶
This claim allows for different measurement formats, each identified by a different CoAP Content-Format (Section 12.3 of [RFC7252]). Initially, the only specified format is CoSWID of type "evidence", as per Section 2.9.4 of [RFC9393].¶
This document introduces the "measured components" format that can be used with the EAT Measurements claim in addition or as an alternative to CoSWID.¶
2. Conventions and Definitions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
In this document, CDDL [RFC8610] [RFC9165] [I-D.ietf-cbor-cddl-modules] [I-D.ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control] is used to describe the data formats.¶
3. Information Model
A measured component information element includes the computed digest on the software or configuration payload, along with metadata that helps in identifying the measurement and the authorizing entity for component installation.¶
Table 1 describes the information model of a measured component.¶
IE | Description | Requirement Level |
---|---|---|
Component Name | The name given to a measured component. It is important that this name remains consistent across different releases to allow for better tracking of the same measured item across updates. When combined with a consistent versioning scheme, it enables better signaling from the appraisal procedure to the relying parties. | REQUIRED |
Component Version | A value representing the specific release or development version of the measured component. Using Semantic Versioning is RECOMMENDED. | OPTIONAL |
Digest Value | Hash of the invariant part of the component that is loaded in memory at startup time. | REQUIRED |
Digest Algorithm | Hash algorithm used to compute the Digest Value. | REQUIRED |
Signer | A unique identifier of the entity authorizing installation of the measured component. | REQUIRED |
Countersigners | One or more unique identifiers of further authorizing entities for component installation | OPTIONAL |
4. Data Model
The data model is inspired by the "PSA software component" claim (Section 4.4.1 of [I-D.tschofenig-rats-psa-token]), which has been slightly refactored to take into account the recommendations about new EAT claims design in Appendix E of [I-D.ietf-rats-eat].¶
The following types and semantics have been reused:¶
-
COSE Key Thumbprint [I-D.ietf-cose-key-thumbprint], for signer and countersigners;¶
-
CoSWID software name and version [RFC9393], for component name and version;¶
-
CoRIM digest [I-D.ietf-rats-corim], for digest value and algorithm.¶
4.1. CDDL
The measured-component
data item:¶
measured-component = [ id: component-id measurement: corim.digest signer: ckt ? countersigners: [ + ckt ] ] ; COSE Key Thumbprint ckt = bytes component-id = [ name: text ? version: version ] ;# import $version-scheme from rfc9393 as coswid version = [ val: text ? scheme: coswid.$version-scheme ] ; eventually: ";#import digest from rfcxxxx as corim" corim.digest = [ alg: (int / text) val: bytes ]¶
The CDDL extending the EAT Measurements format:¶
$measurements-body-cbor /= bytes .cbor measured-component $measurements-body-json /= text .b64u measured-component $measurements-body-json /= text .json measured-component $measurements-body-cbor /= text .b64u measured-component¶
5. Examples
(The examples are CBOR only. JSON examples will be added in a future version of this document.)¶
The example in Figure 1 is a measured component with all the fields populated.¶
The example in Figure 2 is the same measured component as above but used as the format of a measurements
claim in a EAT claims-set.¶
Note that the example uses a CoAP Content-Format value from the experimental range (65000), which will change to the value assigned by IANA for the application/measured-component+cbor
Content-Format.¶
Note also that the array contains only one measured component, but additional entries could be added if the measured TCB is made of multiple, individually measured components.¶
7. IANA Considerations
RFC Editor: replace "RFCthis" with the RFC number assigned to this document.¶
7.1. Media Types Registrations
IANA is requested to add the following media types to the "Media Types" registry [IANA.media-types].¶
Name | Template | Reference |
---|---|---|
mc+cbor
|
application/measured-component+cbor
|
RFCthis |
mc+json
|
application/measured-component+json
|
RFCthis |
7.1.1. application/measured-component+cbor
- Type name:
-
application¶
- Subtype name:
-
measured-component+cbor¶
- Required parameters:
-
n/a¶
- Optional parameters:
-
n/a¶
- Encoding considerations:
-
binary (CBOR)¶
- Security considerations:
- Interoperability considerations:
-
n/a¶
- Published specification:
-
RFCthis¶
- Applications that use this media type:
-
Attesters, Verifiers and Relying Parties¶
- Fragment identifier considerations:
-
The syntax and semantics of fragment identifiers are as specified for "application/cbor". (No fragment identification syntax is currently defined for "application/cbor".)¶
- Person & email address to contact for further information:
-
RATS WG mailing list (rats@ietf.org)¶
- Intended usage:
-
COMMON¶
- Restrictions on usage:
-
none¶
- Author/Change controller:
-
IETF¶
- Provisional registration:
-
no¶
7.1.2. application/measured-component+json
- Type name:
-
application¶
- Subtype name:
-
measured-component+json¶
- Required parameters:
-
n/a¶
- Optional parameters:
-
n/a¶
- Encoding considerations:
-
binary (JSON is UTF-8-encoded text)¶
- Security considerations:
- Interoperability considerations:
-
n/a¶
- Published specification:
-
RFCthis¶
- Applications that use this media type:
-
Attesters, Verifiers and Relying Parties¶
- Fragment identifier considerations:
-
The syntax and semantics of fragment identifiers are as specified for "application/json". (No fragment identification syntax is currently defined for "application/json".)¶
- Person & email address to contact for further information:
-
RATS WG mailing list (rats@ietf.org)¶
- Intended usage:
-
COMMON¶
- Restrictions on usage:
-
none¶
- Author/Change controller:
-
IETF¶
- Provisional registration:
-
no¶
7.2. Measured Component Content-Format Registrations
IANA is requested to register two Content-Format numbers in the "CoAP Content-Formats" sub-registry, within the "Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Parameters" Registry [IANA.core-parameters], as follows:¶
Content-Type | Content Coding | ID | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
application/measured-component+cbor | - | TBD1 | RFCthis |
application/measured-component+json | - | TBD2 | RFCthis |
8. References
8.1. Normative References
- [I-D.ietf-cbor-cddl-modules]
- Bormann, C., "CDDL Module Structure", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-modules-01, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-modules-01>.
- [I-D.ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control]
- Bormann, C., "More Control Operators for CDDL", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control-03, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control-03>.
- [I-D.ietf-cose-key-thumbprint]
- Isobe, K., Tschofenig, H., and O. Steele, "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) Key Thumbprint", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint-04, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint-04>.
- [I-D.ietf-rats-corim]
- Birkholz, H., Fossati, T., Deshpande, Y., Smith, N., and W. Pan, "Concise Reference Integrity Manifest", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-rats-corim-03, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-corim-03>.
- [I-D.ietf-rats-eat]
- Lundblade, L., Mandyam, G., O'Donoghue, J., and C. Wallace, "The Entity Attestation Token (EAT)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-rats-eat-25, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat-25>.
- [IANA.core-parameters]
- IANA, "Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Parameters", <http://www.iana.org/assignments/core-parameters>.
- [IANA.media-types]
- IANA, "Media Types", <http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types>.
- [RFC2119]
- Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
- [RFC7252]
- Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., and C. Bormann, "The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)", RFC 7252, DOI 10.17487/RFC7252, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7252>.
- [RFC8174]
- Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
- [RFC8610]
- Birkholz, H., Vigano, C., and C. Bormann, "Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures", RFC 8610, DOI 10.17487/RFC8610, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610>.
- [RFC9165]
- Bormann, C., "Additional Control Operators for the Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL)", RFC 9165, DOI 10.17487/RFC9165, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9165>.
- [RFC9393]
- Birkholz, H., Fitzgerald-McKay, J., Schmidt, C., and D. Waltermire, "Concise Software Identification Tags", RFC 9393, DOI 10.17487/RFC9393, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9393>.
8.2. Informative References
- [I-D.tschofenig-rats-psa-token]
- Tschofenig, H., Frost, S., Brossard, M., Shaw, A. L., and T. Fossati, "Arm's Platform Security Architecture (PSA) Attestation Token", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-tschofenig-rats-psa-token-22, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tschofenig-rats-psa-token-22>.
Appendix B. Open Issues
The list of currently open issues for this documents can be found at https://github.com/thomas-fossati/draft-fft-rats-eat-measured-component/issues.¶
Note to RFC Editor: please remove before publication.¶
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank TBD for their comments, reviews and suggestions.¶