Network Working Group                                       J. Head, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                             T. Przygienda
Intended status: Standards Track                        Juniper Networks
Expires: 24 April 2022                                   21 October 2021


              BGP-LS Extensions for IS-IS Flood Reflectors
                    draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-00

Abstract

   This document defines new BGP-LS (BGP Link-State) TLVs in order to
   carry IS-IS Flood Reflection information.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 24 April 2022.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text
   as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.







Head & Przygienda         Expires 24 April 2022                 [Page 1]


Internet-Draft       BGP-LS Extensions for IS-IS FR         October 2021


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  BGP-LS Extensions for IS-IS Flood Reflectors  . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  BGP-LS TLVs for IS-IS Flood Reflection  . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     4.1.  Requested TLV Entries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   6.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     7.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4

1.  Introduction

   BGP Link-State RFC7752 [RFC7752] defines mechanisms to advertise
   information about the underlying IGP in BGP NLRI to an external
   entity (e.g. a controller).  New BGP-LS TLVs are required in order to
   faciliate IS-IS Flood Reflection [IS-IS-FR] extensions.

1.1.  Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

2.  BGP-LS Extensions for IS-IS Flood Reflectors

   This document defines the following BGP-LS TLV code point value in
   accordance with RFC7752 rules:

   +================+======================+=======================+
   | TLV Code Point | Description          | IS-IS TLV             |
   +================+======================+=======================+
   | TBD1           | Flood Reflection TLV | TBD1 (161) [IS-IS-FR] |
   +----------------+----------------------+-----------------------+

            Table 1: BGP-LS Flood Reflection TLV Code Points

   TLV formats are described in detail in subsequent subsections.

3.  BGP-LS TLVs for IS-IS Flood Reflection

   This TLV advertises Flood Reflector details.  The semantics and
   values of the fields in the TLV are described in [IS-IS-FR].





Head & Przygienda         Expires 24 April 2022                 [Page 2]


Internet-Draft       BGP-LS Extensions for IS-IS FR         October 2021


      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |             Type              |             Length            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |C|  RESERVED   |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                  Flood Reflection Cluster ID                  |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                      Figure 1: Flood Reflection TLVs

   where:

      *Type:*  TBD1

      *Length:*  5

4.  IANA Considerations

   This section requests entries from the "BGP-LS Node Descriptor, Link
   Descriptor, Prefix Descriptor, and Attribute TLVs" registry for the
   following TLVs:

4.1.  Requested TLV Entries

   +================+======================+
   | TLV Code Point | Description          |
   +================+======================+
   | TBD1           | Flood Reflection TLV |
   +----------------+----------------------+

             Table 2: IANA Requests

5.  Security Considerations

   Procedures and protocol extensions defined in this document do not
   affect the BGP security model.  See the "Security Considerations"
   section of [RFC4271] for a discussion of BGP security.  Also, refer
   to [RFC4272] and [RFC6952] for analyses of BGP security issues.
   Security considerations for acquiring and distributing BGP-LS
   information are discussed in [RFC7752].









Head & Przygienda         Expires 24 April 2022                 [Page 3]


Internet-Draft       BGP-LS Extensions for IS-IS FR         October 2021


   The TLVs introduced in this document are used to propagate IS-IS
   Flood Reflection TLVs defined in [IS-IS-FR].  These TLVs represent
   IS-IS Flood Reflector state and are therefore assumed to support any/
   all of the required security and authentication mechanisms as
   described in [IS-IS-FR] to prevent any security issues when
   propagating the TLVs into BGP-LS.

6.  Acknowledgements

7.  References

7.1.  Normative References

   [IS-IS-FR] Przygienda, T., Bowers, C., Lee, Y., Sharma, A., and R.
              White, "IS-IS Flood Reflection", October 2021,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-
              isis-flood-reflection>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC4271]  Rekhter, Y., Li, T., and S. Hares, "A Border Gateway
              Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", January 2006,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.

   [RFC4272]  Murphy, S., "BGP Security Vulnerabilities Analysis",
              January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4272>.

   [RFC6952]  Jethanandani, M., Patel, K., and L. Zheng, "Analysis of
              BGP, LDP, PCEP, and MSDP Issues According to the Keying
              and Authentication for Routing Protocols (KARP) Design
              Guide", May 2013,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6952>.

   [RFC7752]  Gredler, H., Medved, J., Previdi, S., Farrel, A., and S.
              Ray, "North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and Traffic
              Engineering (TE) Information Using BGP", March 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7752>.

   [RFC8126]  Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
              Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", June
              2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.

Authors' Addresses





Head & Przygienda         Expires 24 April 2022                 [Page 4]


Internet-Draft       BGP-LS Extensions for IS-IS FR         October 2021


   Jordan Head (editor)
   Juniper Networks
   1137 Innovation Way
   Sunnyvale, CA
   United States of America

   Email: jhead@juniper.net


   Tony Przygienda
   Juniper Networks
   1137 Innovation Way
   Sunnyvale, CA
   United States of America

   Email: prz@juniper.net



































Head & Przygienda         Expires 24 April 2022                 [Page 5]