AAA Working Group Mark Beadles, UUNET INTERNET-DRAFT Bernard Aboba Category: Informational Glen Zorn <draft-ietf-aaa-na-reqts-00.txt> Microsoft 20 October 1999 Tom Hiller Pete McCann Hajime Shiino Lucent Gopal Dommety, Cisco Systems, Inc. Steven M. Glass Charles Perkins Nokia Telecommunications Stuart Jacobs, GTE Laboratories Basavaraj Patil Serge Manning Nortel Networks Pat Walsh, Ameritech Xing Chen, Alcatel Mark Munson, GTE Wireless Sanjeevan Sivalingham Ericsson Wireless Communications Byng-Keun Lim, LG Information & Communications, Ltd. Brent Hirschman, Motorola Ray Hsu, Qualcomm, Inc. Haeng Koo, Samsung Telecommunications America, Inc. Mark Lipford, Sprint PCS Pat Calhoun, Sun Microsystems Eric Jaques, Vodaphone Airtouch Yingchun Xu, 3Com Corporation Shinich Baba, Toshiba America Research, Inc. Takahiro Ayaki, DDI Corporation Takuo Seki, IDO Corporation Alan Hameed, Fujitsu Criteria for Evaluating AAA Protocols for Network Access This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet- Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. To view the list Internet-Draft Shadow Directories, see Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 1]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. The distribution of this memo is unlimited. It is filed as <draft-ietf- aaa-na-reqts-00.txt>, and expires May 1, 2000. Please send comments to the authors. 1. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved. 2. Abstract This document represents a summary of AAA protocol requirements for network access. In creating this documents, inputs were taken from documents produced by the NASREQ, ROAMOPS, and MOBILEIP working groups, as well as from TIA 45.6. This document summarizes the requirements collected from those sources, separating requirements for authentication, authorization and accounting. Details on the requirements are available in the original documents. 3. Introduction This document represents a summary of AAA protocol requirements for network access. In creating this documents, inputs were taken from documents produced by the NASREQ, ROAMOPS, and MOBILEIP working groups, as well as from TIA 45.6. This document summarizes the requirements collected from those sources, separating requirements for authentication, authorization and accounting. Details on the requirements are available in the original documents. 3.1. Requirements language In this document, the key words "MAY", "MUST, "MUST NOT", "optional", "recommended", "SHOULD", and "SHOULD NOT", are to be interpreted as described in [1]. Please note that the requirements specified in this document are to be used in evaluating AAA protocol submissions. As such, the requirements language refers to capabilities of these protocols; the protocol documents will specify whether these features are required, recommended, or optional. For example, requiring that a protocol support confidentiality is NOT the same thing as requiring that all protocol traffic be encrypted. A protocol submission is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more of the MUST or MUST NOT requirements for the capabilities that it implements. A protocol submission that satisfies all the MUST, MUST NOT, SHOULD and SHOULD NOT requirements for its capabilities is said to Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 2]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the MUST and MUST NOT requirements but not all the SHOULD or SHOULD NOT requirements for its protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant." 4. Requirements Summary The criteria for evaluation of AAA protocols for network access are summarized below. Details of the requirements are available from the references described in the footnotes. 4.1. Authentication Requirements +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Authentication | NASREQ | ROAMOPS | MOBILE | TIA | | Reqts. | | | IP | 45.6 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | PPP Support | M | M | O | M | | | 8 | 1 | 29 | 42 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | SLIP Support | | O | O | | | | | 1 | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Scripting Support | | B | O | | | | | 1 | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | NAI Support | M | M | S | M | | | 9 | 2 | 30 | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | CHAP Support | M | M | O | M | | | 10 | 3 | | 44 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | EAP Support | M | S | O | | | | 10 | 3 | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | PAP Support | M | B | O | | | | 10 | 3 | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Scalability | | M | M | M | | | | 3 | | 44 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Bi-directional Auth | M | | | | | | 16 | | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Dynamic Authentication | M | | | | | | 17 | | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Indentification Only | M | | | S | | without Authentication | 9 | | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | End-to-End per-attribute | M | M | S | | | confidentiality | 26 | 6 | 31 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | End-to-End per-attribute | | M | S | | | integrity | | 6 | 31 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Certificate validation | | | S | S | | | | | 38 | 45 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Trust establishment via | | | M | | | brokers | | | 31 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 4]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Anonymous access by local| | | M | | | AAA server | | | 36 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Reliable AAA transport | | | M | M | | mechanism | | | 36 | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Support Proxy and Non- | | | | M | | Proxy Brokers | | | | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Key M = MUST S = SHOULD O = MAY N = MUST NOT B = SHOULD NOT Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 5]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 4.2. Authorization Requirements +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Authorization | NASREQ | ROAMOPS | MOBILE | TIA | | Reqts. | | | IP | 45.6 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | IPv4 Support | M | M | M | M | | | 11 | 1 | 32 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | IPv6 Support | M | | S | | | | 11 | 1 | 33 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | non-IP Support | | O | O | | | | | 1 | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | RADIUS gateway | S | M | O | M | | capability | 12 | 3 | | 46 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Policy | | M | | | | compatibility | | 4 | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Dynamic address | M | M | M | M | | assignment | 11 | 5 | 34 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Static address | | O | M | | | assignment | | 5 | 32 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Precludes layer 2 | N | N | O | | | tunneling | 11 | 5 | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 6]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Precludes Mobile IP | | N | N | N | | | | 5 | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Non-repudiation | | | O | M | | | | 6 | 35 | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Fraud prevention and | | M | O | S | | detection | | 6 | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Hop-by-hop security | | M | S | M | | (privacy, integrity) | | 6 | 35 | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | IPSEC compatibility | S | O | O | M | | | 28 | 6 | | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | End-to-End per-attribute | M | M | O | M | | confidentiality | 13, 27 | 6 | | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | End-to-End per-attribute | | M | O | M | | integrity | | 6 | 31 | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Dynamic Authorization | M | | S | | | | 18 | | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Support for Access Rules,| M | | O | | | Restrictions, Filters | 11, 19 | | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 7]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Resource Management | M | | | | | | 20 | | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Ability to obtain QoS | | | S | M | | info from AAA | | | 36 | 47 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Certificate validation | | | S | M | | | | | 38 | 45 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Trust establishment via | | | M | | | brokers | | | 31 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Allocation or coordinate | | | S | S | | IP address assignment | | | 37 | 47 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Reliable AAA transport | | | M | M | | mechanism | | | 36 | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Support Proxy and Non- | | | | M | | Proxy Brokers | | | | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Key M = MUST S = SHOULD O = MAY N = MUST NOT B = SHOULD NOT Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 8]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 4.3. Accounting Requirements +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Accounting | NASREQ | ROAMOPS | MOBILE | TIA | | Reqts. | | | IP | 45.6 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Real-time accounting | M | M | O | M | | | 14 | 7 | 35 | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Standard Accounting | | M | M | M | | Record | | 7 | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Compact Accounting | | M | O | O | | Record | | 7 | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Accounting Record | M | M | O | M | | Extensibility | 15 | 7 | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Batch Accounting | S | | | O | | | 21 | | | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Guaranteed Delivery | M | | M | M | | | 22 | | 35 | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Accounting Time Stamps | M | | | M | | | 23 | | | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | End-to-End per-attribute | M | M | M | O | | integrity | 24 | 6 | 31 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 9]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | End-to-End per-attribute | S | M | M | O | | confidentiality | 24 | 6 | 31 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Non-repudiation | S | | S | M | | | 25 | | 35 | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Trust establishment via | | | M | | | brokers | | | 31 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Reliable AAA transport | | | M | M | | mechanism | | | 36 | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Support Proxy and Non- | | | | M | | Proxy Brokers | | | | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Key M = MUST S = SHOULD O = MAY N = MUST NOT B = SHOULD NOT Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 10]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 4.4. Unique Mobile IP requirements In addition Mobile IP also has the following requirements: +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Dynamic Setup of security| | | S | S | | assoc. between local AAA | | | 36 | 43 | | and external authority | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Security Assoc. between | | | S | M | | attendant and local AAA | | | 36 | 43 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Local AAA capability to | | | N | | | gather (secret) info | | | 36 | | | about a MN | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | AAA protocol extensions | | | M | S | | for including Mobile IP | | | 38 | 48 | | registration messages | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Enable key distribution | | | M | S | | for setting up security | | | 38 | 49 | | assoc between mip agents | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Firewall traversal | | | M | | | capability | | | 39 | | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Allocation of local Home | | | S | M | | agent | | | 40 | 50 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Act as a KDC for fast | | | S | S | | handoffs | | | 41 | 51 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 11]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | | | | | Perform pre-shared key | | | S | S | | distribution for IKE | | | | 52 | | | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Key M = MUST S = SHOULD O = MAY N = MUST NOT B = SHOULD NOT Footnotes [1] Section 4.2.1 of [2] [2] Section 4.2.2 of [2]. Also see [8]. [3] Section 4.2.3 of [2]. Also see [14]. [4] Section 4.2.4 of [2]. [5] Section 4.2.5 of [2]. [6] Section 4.2.6 of [2]. [7] Section 4.3 of [2]. [8] Section 6 of [3]. Also see [6]. [9] Section 8.2.2.2 of [3]. Also see [14]. [10] Section 8.2.2.1 of [3]. Also see [14]. [11] Section 8.3.2.2 of [3]. Also see [7]. [12] Section 8.1.1 of [3]. [13] Section 8.1.4.4 of [3]. [14] Section 8.4.1.2 of [3]. [15] Section 8.4.2 of [3]. [16] Section 8.2.1.1 of [3]. [17] Section 8.2.1.2 of [3]. [18] Section 8.3.1.1 of [3]. [19] Section 8.3.2.1 of [3]. Also see [7]. [20] Section 8.3.2.3 of [3]. Also see [6], [7]. [21] Section 8.4.1.3 of [3]. [22] Section 8.4.1.1 of [3]. [23] Section 8.4.1.4 of [3]. [24] Section 8.4.3.1 of [3]. [25] Section 8.4.3.2 of [3]. [26] Section 8.2.3.1 of [3]. [27] Section 8.3.3.1 of [3]. [28] Section 8.1.4.1 of [3]. [29] Refer [15] [30] Refer [16] [31] Section 6 and 3.1 of [5] [32] Refer [17] Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 12]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 [33] Refer [18] [34] Section 5.1 of [5] [35] Section 3.1 of [5] [36] Section 3 of [5] [37] Section 4 of [5] [38] Section 5 of [5] [39] Section 5.2 of [5] [40] Section 5.3 of [5] [41] Section 5.5 of [5] [42] Section 1.1 of [4] [43] Section 3.1 of [4] [44] Section 3.2 of [4] [45] Section 4 of [4] [46] Section 3.4 of [4] [47] Section 2.2 of [4] [48] Section 3.2.1 of [4] [49] Section 3.2.2,3.2.4 and 3.2.5 of [4] [50] Section 3.2.2 of [4] [51] Section 3.2.3 and 3.2.5 of [4] [52] Section 3.3 of [4] 5. References [1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [2] Aboba, B., and G. Zorn, "Criteria for Evaluating Roaming Protocols", RFC 2477, January 1999. [3] Beadles, M., "Criteria for Evaluating Network Access Server Protocols", Internet draft (work in progress), draft-ietf-nasreq- criteria-03.txt, October 1999. [4] Hiller, T., et al., "Cdma2000 Wireless Data Requirements for AAA", Internet draft (work in progress), draft-hiller- cdma2000-AAA-00.txt, October 1999. [5] Glass, S., Jacobs, S., Perkins, C., "Mobile IP Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting Requirements", Internet draft (work in progress), draft-ietf-mobileip-aaa-reqs-01.txt, October 1999. [6] Mitton, D., Beadles, M., "Network Access Server Requirements Next Generation (NASREQNG) NAS Model", Internet draft (work in progress), draft-ietf-nasreq-nasmodel-01.txt, October 1999. [7] Mitton, D., "Network Access Server Requirements: Extended RADIUS Practices", Internet draft (work in progress), draft-ietf-nasreq- Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 13]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 ext-radiuspract-01.txt, October 1999. [8] Aboba, B., and M. Beadles, "The Network Access Identifier", RFC 2486, January 1999. [9] Rigney, C., Rubens, A., Simpson, W., Willens, S., "Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 2138, April, 1997. [10] Rigney, C., "RADIUS Accounting", RFC 2139, April 1997. [11] Simpson, W., Editor, "The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)", STD 51, RFC 1661, July 1994. [12] Sklower, K., Lloyd, B., McGregor, G., Carr, D., and T. Coradetti, "The PPP Multilink Protocol (MP)", RFC 1990, August 1996. [13] Simpson, W., Editor, "PPP LCP Extensions", RFC 1570, January 1994. [14] Blunk, L., Vollbrecht, J., "PPP Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)", RFC 2284, March 1998. [15] Solomon, J., Glass, S., "Mobile-IPv4 Configuration Option for PPP IPCP" RFC 2290, Feb 1998 [16] Calhoun, P., Perkins, C. "Mobile IP Network Access Identifier Extension", draft-ietf-mobileip-mn-nai-05.txt, Oct 1999 [17] Perkins, C., "IP Mobility Support", RFC 2002, Oct 1996 [18] Johnson, D., Perkins, C., "Mobility Support in IPv6", draft-ietf- mobileip-ipv6-08.txt, June 1999 6. Security Considerations This document, being a requirements document, does not have any security concerns. The security requirements on protocols to be evaluated using this document are described in the referenced documents. 7. IANA Considerations This draft does not create any new number spaces for IANA administration. 8. Acknowledgements Thanks to the members of the Mobile IP, AAA, and NASREQ working groups who have discussed and commented on these requirements. Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 14]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 9. Authors' Addresses Mark Anthony Beadles UUNET, an MCI WorldCom Company 5000 Britton Rd. Hilliard, OH 43026 Phone: +1 (614) 723-1941 EMail: mbeadles@wcom.net Tom Hiller Wireless Data Standards & Architectures Lucent Technologies 263 Shuman Drive Room 1HP2F-218 Naperville, IL 60563 Phone: +1 (630) 976-7673 Email: tom.hiller@lucent.com Bernard Aboba Microsoft Corporation One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052 Phone: +1 (425) 936-6605 Fax: +1 (425) 936-7329 EMail: bernarda@microsoft.com Glen Zorn Microsoft Corporation One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052 Phone: +1 (425) 703-1559 Fax: +1 (425) 936-7329 EMail: glennz@microsoft.com Gopal Dommety IOS Network Protocols Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134-1706 Phone: +1 (408) 525-1404 Fax: +1 (408) 526-4952 Email: gdommety@cisco.com Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 15]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 Steven M. Glass Sun Microsystems 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA. 01845 Phone: +1 (781) 442-0504 Fax: +1 (781) 442-1677 Email: steven.glass@sun.com Stuart Jacobs Secure Systems Department GTE Laboratories 40 Sylvan Road, Waltham, MA 02451-1128 Phone: +1 (781) 466-3076 Fax: +1 (781)466-2838 Email: sjacobs@gte.com Basavaraj Patil Wireless Technology Labs Nortel Networks 2221 Lakeside Blvd. Richardson, TX 75082-4399 Phone: +1 (972) 684-1489 Fax: +1 (972) 685-3207 Email: bpatil@nortelnetworks.com Charles E. Perkins Communications Systems Lab Nokia Research Center 313 Fairchild Drive Mountain View, California Phone: +1 (650) 625-2986 Fax: +1 (650) 691-2170 EMail: charliep@iprg.nokia.com Pat R. Calhoun Network and Security Research Center, Sun Labs Sun Microsystems, Inc. 15 Network Circle Menlo Park, CA 94025 Phone: +1 (650) 786-7733 EMail: pcalhoun@eng.sun.com Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 16]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 Ed Campbell 3Com Corporation 1800 W. Central Rd. Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Phone: +1 (847) 342-6769 EMail: ed_campbell@3com.com Raymond T. Hsu Qualcomm Inc. 6455 Lusk Blvd. San Diego, CA 92121 Phone: +1 (619) 651-3623 EMail: rhsu@qualcomm.com Mark A. Lipford Sprint PCS 8001 College Blvd.; Suite 210 Overland Park, KS 66210 Phone: +1 (913) 664-8335 EMail: mlipfo01@sprintspectrum.com Serge Manning Nortel Networks 2201 Lakeside Blvd Richardson, TX 75082-4399 Phone: +1 (972) 684-7277 EMail: smanning@nortelnetworks.com Peter J. McCann Lucent Technologies Rm 2Z-305 263 Shuman Blvd Naperville, IL 60566 Phone: +1 (630) 713 9359 EMail: mccap@lucent.com Mark Munson GTE Wireless One GTE Place Alpharetta, GA 30004 Phone: +1 (678) 339-4439 EMail: mmunson@mobilnet.gte.com Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 17]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 Haeng Koo Samsung Telecommunications America, Inc. 1130 E. Arapaho Road Richardson, TX, USA 75025 Phone: +1 (972) 761-7735 EMail: hkoo@telecom.sna.samsung.com Pat Walsh Ameritech 2000 W. Ameritech Ctr. Dr. Hoffman Estates, IL 60195 Phone: +1 (847) 765-5845 EMail: pwalsh@ameritechcell.com Yingchun Xu 3Com Corporation 1800 W. Central Rd. Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Phone: +1 (847) 342-6814 EMail: Yingchun_Xu@3com.com Brent Hirschman 1501 Shure Dr. Arlington Hieghts, IL 60006 Phone: +1 (847) 632-1563 EMail: qa4053@email.mot.com Eric Jaques Vodafone AirTouch 2999 Oak Road, MS-750 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Phone: +1 (925) 279-6142 EMail: ejaques@akamail.com Sanjeevan Sivalingham Ericsson Wireless Communications Inc., Rm Q-356C 6455 Lusk Blvd San Diego, CA 92126 Phone: +1 (858) 332-5670 EMail: s.sivalingham@ericsson.com Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 18]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 Xing Chen Alcatel USA 1000 Coit Road Plano, TX 75075, USA Phone: +1 (972) 519-4142 Fax: +1 (972) 519-4843 Email: xing.chen@usa.alcatel.com Byng-Keun Lim LG Information & Communications, Ltd. 533, Hogye-dong, Dongan-ku, Anyang-shi, Kyungki-do,431-080, Korea Phone: +82-343-450-7199 Fax: +82-343-450-7050 EMail: bklim@lgic.co.kr Hajime Shiino Lucent Technologies Japan Ltd. 25 Mori Bldg. 1-4-30 Roppongi, Minato-ku Tokyo Phone:+81-3-5561-3695 EMail: hshiino@lucent.com Shinich Baba Toshiba America Research, Inc. PO Box 136, Convent Station, NJ 07961-0136 Phone: +1 (973) 829-4795 EMail: sbaba@tari.toshiba.com Takahiro Ayaki DDI corporation Ichibancho FS Bldg. 8, Ichibancho, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo Phone: +81-3-3221-9682 EMail: ayaki@ddi.co.jp Alan Hameed Fujitsu 2801 Telecom Parkway Richardson, Texas 75082 Phone: +1 (972) 479-2089 Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 19]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 Takuo Seki IDO Corporation Gobancho YS Bldg. 12-3, Gobancho, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo Phone: +81-3-3263-9660 EMail: t-seli@ido.co.jp 10. Intellectual Property Statement The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and standards- related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF Secretariat. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive Director. 11. Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implmentation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 20]
INTERNET-DRAFT Network Access AAA Evaluation Criteria 20 October 1999 INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE." 12. Expiration Date This memo is filed as <draft-ietf-aaa-na-reqts-00.txt>, and expires May 1, 2000. Beadles, et al. Informational [Page 21]
