[Search] [pdf|bibtex] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03 rfc2696                              Informational
Network Working Group                          Chris Weider, Microsoft
INTERNET DRAFT                                  Andy Herron, Microsoft
                                              Anoop Anantha, Microsoft
                                                   Tim Howes, Netscape
                                                        August 7, 1998

LDAP Control Extension for Simple Paged Results Manipulation

0. Status of this Memo

This document is an Internet-Draft.  Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its
areas, and its working groups.  Note that other groups may also
distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-
Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as
``work in progress.''

To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check
the ``1id-abstracts.txt'' listing contained in the Internet-
Drafts Shadow Directories on ftp.ietf.org (US East Coast),
nic.nordu.net (Europe), ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast), or
munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim).

This draft expires February 7, 1999.

1. Abstract

This document describes an LDAPv3 control extension for simple paging
of search results. This control extension allows a client to control
the rate at which an LDAP server returns the results of an LDAP search
operation. This control may be useful when the LDAP client has limited
resources and may not be able to process the entire result set from a
given LDAP query, or when the LDAP client is connected over a
low-bandwidth connection. Other operations on the result set are not
defined in this extension. This extension is not designed to provide
more sophisticated result set management.

The key words "MUST", "SHOULD", and "MAY" used in this document are to
be interpreted as described in [bradner97].

2. The Control

This control is included in the searchRequest and searchResultDone
messages as part of the controls field of the LDAPMessage, as defined
in Section 4.1.12 of [LDAPv3]. The structure of this control is as

pagedResultsControl ::= SEQUENCE {
        controlType     1.2.840.113556.1.4.319,
        criticality     BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE,
        controlValue    searchControlValue

The searchControlValue is an OCTET STRING wrapping the BER-encoded
version of the following SEQUENCE:

realSearchControlValue ::= SEQUENCE {
        size            INTEGER (0..maxInt),
                                -- requested page size from client
                                -- result set size estimate from server
        cookie          OCTET STRING

3. Client-Server Interaction

An LDAP client application that needs to control the rate at which
results are returned MAY specify on the searchRequest a
pagedResultsControl with size set to the desired page size and cookie
set to the zero-length string. The page size specified MAY be greater
than zero and less than the sizeLimit value specified in the

If the page size is greater than or equal to the sizeLimit value,
the server should ignore the control as the request can
be satisfied in a single page. If the server does not support this
control, the server MUST return an error of
unsupportedCriticalExtension if the client requested it as critical,
otherwise the server SHOULD ignore the control. The remainder of this
section assumes the server does not ignore the client's

Each time the server returns a set of results to the client when
processing a search request containing the pagedResultsControl, the
server includes the pagedResultsControl control in the searchResultDone
message. In the control returned to the client, the size MAY be set to
the server's estimate of the total number of entries in the entire
result set. Servers that cannot provide such an estimate MAY set this
size to zero (0).  The cookie MUST be set to an empty value if there
are no more entries to return (i.e., the page of search results
returned was the last), or, if there are more entries to return,
to an octet string of the server's choosing,used to resume the search.

The client MUST consider the cookie to be an opaque structure and make
no assumptions about its internal organization or value. When the
client wants to retrieve more entries for the result set, it MUST send
to the server a searchRequest with all values identical to the initial
request with the exception of the messageID, the cookie, and optionally
a modified pageSize. The cookie MUST be the octet string on the last
searchResultDone response returned by the server. Returning cookies
from previous searchResultDone responses besides the last one is
undefined, as the server implementation may restrict cookies from being

The server will then return the next set of results from the whole
result set. This interaction will continue until the client has
retrieved all the results, in which case the cookie in the
searchResultDone field will be empty, or until the client abandons the
search sequence as described below. Once the paged search sequence
has been completed, the cookie is no longer valid and MUST NOT be

A sequence of paged search requests is abandoned by the client sending
a search request containing a pagedResultsControl with the size set to
zero (0) and the cookie set to the last cookie returned by the server.
A client MAY use the LDAP Abandon operation to abandon one paged search
request in progress, but this is discouraged as it MAY invalidate the
client's cookie.

If, for any reason, the server cannot resume a paged search operation
for a client, then it SHOULD return the appropriate error in a
searchResultDone entry. If this occurs, both client and server should
assume the paged result set is closed and no longer resumable.

A client may have any number of outstanding search requests pending,
any of which may have used the pagedResultsControl.  A server
implementation which requires a limit on the number of outstanding
paged search requests from a given client MAY either return
unwillingToPerform when the client attempts to create a new paged
search request, or age out an older result set.  If the server
implementation ages out an older paged search request, it SHOULD return
"unwilling to perform" if the client attempts to resume the paged search
was aged out.

A client may safely assume that all entries that satisfy a given search
query are returned once and only once during the set of paged search
requests/responses necessary to enumerate the entire result set, unless
the result set for that query has changed since the searchRequest
starting the request/response sequence was processed. In that case, the
client may receive a given entry multiple times and/or may not receive
all entries matching the given search criteria.

4. Example

The following example illustrates the client-server interaction between
a client doing a search requesting a page size limit of 3.  The entire
result set returned by the server contains 5 entries.

Lines beginning with "C:" indicate requests sent from client to
server. Lines beginning with "S:" indicate responses sent from
server to client. Lines beginning with "--" are comments to
help explain the example.

-- Client sends a search request asking for paged results
-- with a page size of 3.
C: SearchRequest + pagedResultsControl(3,"")
-- Server responds with three entries plus an indication
-- of 5 total entries in the search result and an opaque
-- cooking to be used by the client when retrieving subsequent
-- pages.
S: SearchResultEntry
S: SearchResultEntry
S: SearchResultEntry
S: SearchResultDone + pagedResultsControl(5, "opaque")
-- Client sends an identical search request (except for
-- message id), returning the opaque cooking, asking for
-- the next page.
C: SearchRequest + PagedResultsControl(3, "opaque")
-- Server responds with two entries plus an indication
-- that there are no more entries (null cookie).
S: SearchResultEntry
S: SearchResultEntry
S: SearchResultDone + pagedResultsControl(5,"")

5. Relationship to X.500

For LDAP servers providing a front end to X.500 (93) directories,
the paged results control defined in this document may be
mapped directly onto the X.500 (93) PagedResultsRequest defined
in X.511 [x500]. The size parameter may be mapped onto pageSize.
The cookie parameter may be mapped onto queryReference.
The sortKeys and reverse fields in the X.500 PagedResultsRequest
are excluded.

6. Security Considerations

Security considerations are not discussed in this document.

7. References
Wahl, M, S. Kille and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
(v3)", Internet Draft, February, 1997. Available as

Bradner, Scott, "Key Words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Internet Draft, January, 1997. Available as

8. Author's Address

Chris Weider
Microsoft Corp.
1 Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
+1 425 882-8080

Andy Herron
Microsoft Corp.
1 Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
+1 425 882-8080

Anoop Anantha
Microsoft Corp.
1 Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
+1 425 882-8080

Tim Howes
Netscape Communications Corp.
501 E. Middlefield Road
Mountain View, CA 94043
+1 415 937-2600