Definitions of Tests
for ATM Management
April 7, 1999
Internet-Draft <draft-ietf-atommib-test-05.txt>
Michael Noto (editor)
3Com Corporation
mike_noto@3com.com
Kaj Tesink (editor)
Telcordia Technologies
kaj@research.telcordia.com
1. Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance
with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet
Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working
groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working
documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-
Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as
"work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed
at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights
Reserved.
2. Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base
(MIB) for use with network management protocols in the
Internet community. In particular, it describes objects used
for managing ATM-based interfaces, devices, networks and
services in addition to those defined in the ATM MIB [16], to
provide support for the management of on-demand ATM Loopback
Tests.
3. The SNMP Network Management Framework
The SNMP Management Framework presently consists of five major
components:
0 An overall architecture, described in RFC 2271 [1].
0 Mechanisms for describing and naming objects and events
for the purpose of management. The first version of this
Structure of Management Information (SMI) is called SMIv1
and described in RFC 1155 [2], RFC 1212 [3] and RFC 1215
[4]. The second version, called SMIv2, is described in
RFC 1902 [5], RFC 1903 [6] and RFC 1904 [7].
0 Message protocols for transferring management
information. The first version of the SNMP message
protocol is called SNMPv1 and described in RFC 1157 [8].
A second version of the SNMP message protocol, which is
not an Internet standards track protocol, is called
SNMPv2c and described in RFC 1901 [9] and RFC 1906 [10].
The third version of the message protocol is called
SNMPv3 and described in RFC 1906 [10], RFC 2272 [11] and
RFC 2274 [12].
0 Protocol operations for accessing management information.
The first set of protocol operations and associated PDU
formats is described in RFC 1157 [8]. A second set of
protocol operations and associated PDU formats is
described in RFC 1905 [13].
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
0 A set of fundamental applications described in RFC 2273
[14] and the view-based access control mechanism
described in RFC 2275 [15].
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store,
termed the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the
MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI.
This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the
SMIv2. A MIB conforming to the SMIv1 can be produced through
the appropriate translations. The resulting translated MIB
must be semantically equivalent, except where objects or
events are omitted because no translation is possible (e.g.,
use of Counter64). Some machine readable information in SMIv2
will be converted into textual descriptions in SMIv1 during
the translation process. However, this loss of machine
readable information is not considered to change the semantics
of the MIB.
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
4. Overview
The purpose of this memo is to provide additional
capabilities, not found in the ATM MIB [16], which are needed
to manage ATM interfaces. This memo addresses ATM Testing
Support and must be used in conjunction with the
System/Interface Test MIB [22].
4.1. Background
In addition to the MIB module defined in this memo, other MIB
modules are necessary to manage ATM interfaces, links and
cross-connects. Examples include MIB II for general system
[17] and interface management [18], the DS3 or SONET/SDH MIBs
for management of SONET/SDH and DS3 physical interfaces, and,
as appropriate, MIB modules for applications that make use of
ATM, such as SMDS and LAN Emulation. These MIB modules are
outside the scope of this specification.
This MIB module requires the use of the ATM MIB module defined
in [16] and the System/Interface Test MIB module [22].
This memo defines extensions to the ATM MIB in order to
support ATM Loopback Tests. An ATM Loopback Test provides the
ability to send out a loopback OAM (Operations and
Maintenance) cell to verify the existence of connectivity for
a particular connection.
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
4.2. Terminology
The following terms are defined here and used throughout this
MIB:
- Virtual Path Link (VPL)
- Virtual Path Connection (VPC)
- Virtual Path Segment (VP Segment)
- Virtual Channel Link (VCL)
- Virtual Channel Connection (VCC)
- Virtual Channel Segment (VC Segment).
_____ _______ _______ _______ _____
| |____| |____| |____| |____| |
|Host1| |SwitchA| |SwitchB| |SwitchC| |Host2|
| |____| |____| |____| |____| |
|_____| |_______| |_______| |_______| |_____|
|<----->| Virtual |<----->| Virtual
Path Link Path Link
|<------------Virtual Path Connection---------->|
(between Host1 and Host2)
|<--------------->| Virtual Path
Segment (between
SwitchA and SwitchC)
Figure 1: Examples of Virtual Path Links, Virtual Path
Connection, and Virtual Path Segment
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
_____ _______ _______ _______ _____
| |____| |____| |____| |____| |
|Host1|----|SwitchA|----|SwitchB|----|SwitchC|----|Host2|
| |____| |____| |____| |____| |
|_____| |_______| |_______| |_______| |_____|
|<----->| Virtual |<----->| Virtual
Channel Link Channel Link
|<----------Virtual Channel Connection--------->|
(between Host1 and Host2)
|<--------------->| Virtual Channel
Segment (between
SwitchA and SwitchC)
Figure 2: Examples of Virtual Channel Links, Virtual
Channel Connection, and Virtual Channel Segment
4.3. Supported Functions
The managed ATM objects are organized as follows:
(1) ATM Loopback Testing
(2) ATM End-Point Tables
4.3.1. ATM Loopback Testing
The loopback test provides the ability to send out a loopback
OAM cell to verify the existence of connectivity for a
particular connection. Loopback tests can be performed on
either an entire connection (i.e., an end-to-end test), a
segment of the connection (i.e., a segment test), a portion of
a segment (i.e., a loopback location identifier test), or the
network portion of a connection (i.e., a service internal
test).
The loopback test makes use of the Test Table defined in [22].
For a given interface, a loopback test can be invoked by
obtaining ownership of a test and then by setting the value of
testType equal to one of the ATM Loopback Test Types defined
in Section 5. See procedures in [22] for using the Test Table.
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
After invoking a loopback test, the object testResult can be
read to determine the outcome of the loopback test (e.g.,
'success(2)' if the loopback cell made it back to the
originator of the test or 'failed(7)' if the loopback cell did
not make it back).
The following types of loopback tests are defined:
- End-to-end Loopback Test
- Segment Loopback Test
- Loopback Test Using Loopback Location Identifier
- Network Loopback Test.
1) End-to-end Loopback Test
The end-to-end loopback (LB) is self-explanatory. For a VP
test, the cell is sent on the given VP, via VCI=4 specified in
[20]. For a VC test, the LB cell is sent on the VC under
test, with the PTI (Payload Type Indicator) set to 5 as
specified in [20]. Figure 3 illustrates the end-to-end
loopback test.
____ _______ _______ _______ ____
|Host| | | | | | | |Host|
|____|----|SwitchA|----|SwitchB|----|SwitchC|----|____|
|_______| |_______| |_______|
|<--------------------------------------------->| Test
Path
Figure 3: End-to-end Loopback Test
See Section 5 for more details on how to use the End-to-end
Loopback Test.
2) Segment Loopback Test
The segment LB test is explained in ITU-T I.610[21]. For a VP
segment test, the LB cell is sent on the VP under test via
VCI=3 as specified in [20], and the Loopback Location ID field
is set to all 1's. For a VC segment test, the LB cell is sent
on the VC under test, with the PTI set to 4 as specified in
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
[20], and the Loopback Location ID field is set to all 1's.
This test involves a LB cell being inserted at a pre-defined
segment end-point, and looped back at the corresponding
segment end-point encountered. The pair of segment end-points
define a segment (which is used for the segment loopback
test). A VP/VC connection can have multiple segments, but
multiple segments cannot overlap.
A UNI interface is by definition defined as a segment end-
point (hence a UNI would be considered a segment). A segment
can also define:
- a B-ICI
- a public carrier's 'piece' of the connection
- a private network's 'piece' of the connection.
In order to support this functionality, the VP/VC link
termination needs to be able to be defined as a segment. This
can be done using either the atmVplSegmentEndPoint or
atmVclSegmentEndPoint object depending on whether it is for a
VPC or VCC. A segment loopback test is illustrated in Figure
4.
____ _______ _______ _______ ____
|Host| | | | | | | |Host|
|____|----|SwitchA|----|SwitchB|----|SwitchC|----|____|
|_______| |_______| |_______|
|<----------------------->| Segment
Figure 4: Segment Loopback Test
Section 5 describes the use of the ATM Segment Loopback Tests.
3) Loopback Test Using Loopback Location Identifier
This loopback test is a special type of 2) where the Loopback
Location ID field is set to a value that corresponds to a
specific node in a given network (Note that the format of this
field is not standardized, that is, the value is significant
only within an administrative domain). In this case, the
device initiating the LB test inserts the appropriate Loop
Back Location ID. When the LB cell reaches the corresponding
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
device, that device recognizes the Loopback Location ID as its
own, and loops it back. This test is useful for performing
fault sectionalization without having to provision segment
end-points. An additional object, the atmLoopbackID, is
defined to determine the loopback point. Figure 5 shows a
loopback test using a location identifier. Note that the
loopback test using location identifier can be used to perform
a loopback test over a portion of a defined segment. See
Figure 5.
____ _______ _______ _______ ____
|Host| | | | | | | |Host|
|____|----|SwitchA|----|SwitchB|----|SwitchC|----|____|
|_______| |_______| |_______|
|<---------->| Portion of Segment that
Loopback test is
performed on
|<----------------------->| Segment
Figure 5: Loopback Test Using Location Identifier
See Section 5 for more details.
4) Network Loopback Test
This is a loopback test that the manager requests an agent in
a network to perform over the internal portion of a designated
connection. The Network then initiates the internal network
loopback test by inserting an OAM loopback cell at one of the
end-points of the internal network portion of the connection.
When the loopback cell reaches the other end-point of the
internal Network , the cell is looped back. This test is
useful for verifying connectivity through a particular
network. Figure 6 illustrates the Network loopback test.
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
____ _______ _______ _______ ____
|Host| |Netwk 1| |Netwk 1| |Netwk 1| |Host|
|____|----|SwitchA|----|SwitchB|----|SwitchC|----|____|
|_______| |_______| |_______|
|<----------------------->| LB Test Path
thru Network 1
Figure 6: Network Loopback Test
See Section 5 for more details.
4.3.2. ATM End-Point Tables
There are two ATM End-point tables: the ATM VP End-point Table
and the ATM VC End-point Table. The ATM VP End-point Table
augments the atmVplTable and defines the
atmVplEndptSegmentEndPoint object to represent whether or not
a specified VPL is a segment end-point. Similarly for Virtual
Channels, the ATM VC End-point Table and the
atmVclEndptSegmentEndPoint object are used to represent
whether or not a specified VCL is a segment end-point.
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
5. Definitions
ATMTEST-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-IDENTITY,
OBJECT-TYPE, mib-2
FROM SNMPv2-SMI
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF
atmVplEntry, atmVclEntry
FROM ATM-MIB;
atmTESTMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "9904071200Z"
ORGANIZATION "IETF AToMMIB Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO
" Michael Noto
Postal: 3Com Corporation
5400 Bayfront Plaza
Santa Clara, CA 95052
USA
Tel: +1 408 326 2218
E-mail: mike_noto@3com.com
Kaj Tesink
Postal: Telcordia Technologies
331 Newman Springs Road
Red Bank, NJ 07701
USA
Tel: +1 732 758 5254
Fax: +1 732 758 2269
E-mail: kaj@research.telcordia.com"
DESCRIPTION
"This MIB Module provides
ATM Loopback Tests and supporting objects
that must be supported by ATM devices
providing ATM Loopback Tests."
::= { mib-2 XX }
-- ******** NOTE TO THE RFC EDITOR / IANA ***********
-- * Before this module is put on the standards track
-- * assign XX by IANA.
-- * remove this notice from the MIB
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
atmTESTMIBObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {atmTESTMIB 1}
-- This ATMTEST-MIB Module consists of the following:
-- (1) ATM Loopback Testing
-- (2) ATM End-Point Tables
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
-- ************************************************
-- (1) ATM Loopback Testing
-- This concerns information for interfaces
-- supporting ATM Loopback Tests and includes:
-- 1. ATM Loopback Objects
-- 2. List of ATM Loopback Test Types
atmLoopbackTestGroup OBJECT IDENTIFIER::= {
atmTESTMIBObjects 1}
-- 1. ATM Loopback Objects
-- The following objects are defined for use in
-- performing ATM Loopback Tests.
atmLoopbackID OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX OCTET STRING(SIZE(16))
MAX-ACCESS read-write
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This identifier is used to identify this local
ATM device. The value of this object can be used
by other ATM devices to identify this local ATM
device as the device that is being requested to
loopback the OAM Loopback cell. The default for
this field is all 1's, which would indicate a
segment OAM Loopback Test. Location Identifiers of
less than 16 octets are left justified, and padded
with all 0's."
DEFVAL { 'ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff'H }
::= { atmLoopbackTestGroup 1 }
-- 2. List of ATM Loopback Test Types
-- The following loopback test types are defined:
-- atmLoopbackVpE2e
-- atmLoopbackVcE2e
-- atmLoopbackVpSegment
-- atmLoopbackVcSegment
-- atmLoopbackVpLocationID
-- atmLoopbackVcLocationID
-- atmLoopbackVpServiceInternal
-- atmLoopbackVcServiceInternal
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
atmLoopbackTestTypes OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
atmLoopbackTestGroup 4 }
atmLoopbackVpE2e OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This is an end-to-end loopback test performed on a
designated VP (Virtual Path). To perform this test
an end-to-end loopback OAM cell is inserted at one
of the end-points of the designated VP connection
(e.g., at a host) via VCI=4 (the VCI value for VP
OAM end-to-end cells), travels to the other end-
point of the VP connection, and then loops back to
the originating end-point on the designated VP.
Success is achieved if the loopback OAM cell
returns to the originating end-point within 5
seconds, otherwise, the test fails.
The manager-station performs a loopback test by
making use of the testTable defined in [22]. In
order to run this test the object testType in the
testTable shall be set to atmLoopbackVpE2e, and the
object testTarget points to the row in the
atmVplTable in [16] corresponding to the VP
designated for the test.
Before starting a test, a manager-station must
first obtain 'ownership' of the entry in the
testTable for the interface to be tested (follow
procedure defined in [22]). Once the manager-
station obtains ownership, a loopback test for a
given interface can be invoked by first setting up
parameters necessary for the loopback test (e.g.,
set the testTarget), and then setting the value of
testType in the testTable equal to
'atmLoopbackVpE2e'. The testRowStatus is used to
invoke the atmLoopbackVpE2e test on the VP with the
VPI corresponding to the testTarget.
After invoking a loopback test, wait for the test
completion by polling for the object testResult. A
value of 'inProgress(3)' will result if the test is
still in progress. Once the test is completed, the
object testResult will have a value of 'success(2)'
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
if the loopback OAM cell returned to the originator
of the test within 5 seconds, if not, a value of
'failed(7)' will result. If the ATM system does
not support this type of loopback test, then a
value of 'notSupported(4)' will be provided. Other
possible values for the testResult object are
'unAbleToRun(5)' and 'aborted(6)'."
::= { atmLoopbackTestTypes 1 }
atmLoopbackVcE2e OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This is an end-to-end loopback test performed on a
designated VC (Virtual Channel). To perform this
test an end-to-end loopback OAM cell is inserted at
one of the end-points of the designated VC
connection (e.g., at a host) via PTI=5 (the PTI
value used for VC OAM end-to-end cells), travels to
the other end-point of the VC connection, and then
loops back to the originating end-point on the
designated VC. Success is achieved if the loopback
OAM cell returns to the originating end-point within
5 seconds, otherwise, the test fails.
The manager-station performs a loopback test by
making use of the testTable defined in [22]. In
order to run this test the object testType in the
testTable shall be set to atmLoopbackVcE2e, and the
object testTarget points to the row in the
atmVclTable in [16] corresponding to the VC
designated for the test.
Before starting a test, a manager-station must first
obtain 'ownership' of the entry in the testTable for
the interface to be tested (follow procedure defined
in [22]). Once the manager-station obtains
ownership, a loopback test for a given interface can
be invoked by first setting up parameters necessary
for the loopback test (e.g., set the testTarget),
and then setting the value of testType in the
testTable equal to 'atmLoopbackVcE2e'. The
testRowStatus is used to invoke the atmLoopbackVcE2e
test on the VC with the VPI/VCI corresponding to the
testTarget.
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
After invoking a loopback test, wait for the test
completion by polling for the object testResult. A
value of 'inProgress(3)' will result if the test is
still in progress. Once the test is completed, the
object testResult will have a value of 'success(2)'
if the loopback OAM cell returned to the originator
of the test within 5 seconds, if not, a value of
'failed(7)' will result. If the ATM system does not
support this type of loopback test, then a value of
'notSupported(4)' will be provided. Other possible
values for the testResult object are
'unAbleToRun(5)' and 'aborted(6)'."
::= { atmLoopbackTestTypes 2 }
atmLoopbackVpSegment OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This is a loopback test performed on a designated
segment of a VP (Virtual Path). To perform this test
a segment OAM cell is inserted at one of the segment
end-points of the designated VP connection (e.g., at
a host) via VCI=3 (the VCI used for VP OAM segment
cells), travels across the segment on the designated
VP to the device pre-configured as the corresponding
segment end-point, and then loops back to the
originating segment end-point on the designated VP.
Success is achieved if the loopback OAM cell returns
to the originating end-point within 5 seconds,
otherwise, the test fails.
In order to use the atmLoopbackVpSegment test, a
segment must be defined by setting up segment end-
points using the atmVplEndptSegmentEndPoint object
from the atmVplEndptTable. The
atmVplEndptSegmentEndPoint is set to
'isaVpSegmentEndPoint(1)' for each segment end-point.
Note that this object is by default set to
'isaVpSegmentEndPoint(1)' if the atmVplTable supports
one end of a UNI. In such a case, a UNI VP loopback
test would be achieved when the atmLoopbackVpSegment
test was initiated over the UNI.
The manager-station performs a loopback test by
making use of the testTable defined in [22]. In
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
order to run this test the object testType in the
testTable shall be set to atmLoopbackVpE2e, and the
object testTarget points to the row in the
atmVplTable in [16] corresponding to the VP
designated for the test.
Before starting a test, a manager-station must first
obtain 'ownership' of the entry in the testTable for
the interface to be tested (follow procedure defined
in [22]). Once the manager-station obtains
ownership, a loopback test for a given interface can
be invoked by first setting up parameters necessary
for the loopback test (e.g., set the testTarget), and
then setting the value of testType in the testTable
equal to 'atmLoopbackVpSegment'. The testRowStatus is
used to invoke the atmLoopbackVpSegment test on the
VP with the VPI corresponding to the testTarget.
After invoking a loopback test, wait for the test
completion by polling for the object testResult. A
value of 'inProgress(3)' will result if the test is
still in progress. Once the test is completed, the
object testResult will have a value of 'success(2)'
if the loopback OAM cell returned to the originator
of the test within 5 seconds, if not, a value of
'failed(7)' will result. If the ATM system does not
support this type of loopback test, then a value of
'notSupported(4)' will be provided. Other possible
values for the testResult object are 'unAbleToRun(5)'
and 'aborted(6)'."
::= { atmLoopbackTestTypes 3 }
atmLoopbackVcSegment OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This is a loopback test performed on a designated
segment of a VC (Virtual Channel). To perform this
test a segment OAM cell is inserted at one of the
segment end-points of the designated VC connection
(e.g., at a host) via PTI=4 (the PTI value used for VC
OAM segment cells), travels across the segment on the
designated VC to the device pre-configured as the
corresponding segment end-point, and then loops back
to the originating segment end-point on the designated
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
VC. Success is achieved if the loopback OAM cell
returns to the originating end-point within 5 seconds,
otherwise, the test fails.
In order to use the atmLoopbackVcSegment test, a
segment must be defined by setting up segment end-
points using the atmVclEndptSegmentEndPoint object
from the atmVclEndptTable. The
atmVclEndptSegmentEndPoint is set to
'isaVcSegmentEndPoint(1)' for each segment end-point.
Note that this object is by default set to
'isaVcSegmentEndPoint(1)' if the atmVclTable supports
one end of a UNI. In such a case, a UNI VC loopback
test would be achieved when the atmLoopbackVcSegment
test was initiated over the UNI.
The manager-station performs a loopback test by making
use of the testTable defined in [22]. In order to run
this test the object testType in the testTable shall
be set to atmLoopbackVcE2e, and the object testTarget
points to the row in the atmVclTable in [16]
corresponding to the VC designated for the test.
Before starting a test, a manager-station must first
obtain 'ownership' of the entry in the testTable for
the interface to be tested (follow procedure defined
in [22]). Once the manager-station obtains ownership,
a loopback test for a given interface can be invoked
by first setting up parameters necessary for the
loopback test (e.g., set the testTarget), and then
setting the value of testType in the testTable equal
to 'atmLoopbackVcSegment'. The testRowStatus is used
to invoke the atmLoopbackVcSegment test on the VC with
the VPI/VCI corresponding to the testTarget.
After invoking a loopback test, wait for the test
completion by polling for the object testResult. A
value of 'inProgress(3)' will result if the test is
still in progress. Once the test is completed, the
object testResult will have a value of 'success(2)' if
the loopback OAM cell returned to the originator of
the test within 5 seconds, if not, a value of
'failed(7)' will result. If the ATM system does not
support this type of loopback test, then a value of
'notSupported(4)' will be provided. Other possible
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
values for the testResult object are 'unAbleToRun(5)'
and 'aborted(6)'."
::= { atmLoopbackTestTypes 4 }
atmLoopbackVpLocationId OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This is a loopback test performed on a portion of a
designated VP segment. To perform this test a loopback
OAM cell is inserted at a connection point of the
designated VP connection (e.g., the end-point or a
tandem point) with a value inserted in the Location
Identifier ID field of the OAM cell that corresponds to
the ATM device where the cell is to be looped back.
The loopback cell then travels through the VP
connection until it reaches the designated ATM device,
where it is looped back to the loopback cell insertion
point on the designated VP. Success is achieved if the
loopback OAM cell returns to the originating point of
insertion within 5 seconds, otherwise, the test fails.
The manager-station performs a loopback test by making
use of the testTable defined in [22]. In order to run
this test the object testType in the testTable shall be
set to atmLoopbackVpE2e. The object testTarget points
to the row in the atmVplTable in [16] corresponding to
the VP designated for the test. The object testMoreInfo
contains the desired Loopback Location ID.
Before starting a test, a manager-station must first
obtain 'ownership' of the entry in the testTable for
the interface to be tested (follow procedure defined in
[22]). Once the manager-station obtains ownership, a
loopback test for a given interface can be invoked by
first setting up parameters necessary for the loopback
test (e.g., set testMoreInfo to AAAABBBBCCCCDDDD and
set the testTarget), and then setting the value of
testType in the testTable equal to
'atmLoopbackVpSegment'. The testRowStatus is used to
invoke the atmLoopbackVpLocationId on the VP with the
VPI corresponding to the testTarget and looped back at
loopback location ID= AAAABBBBCCCCDDDD.
After invoking a loopback test, wait for the test
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
completion by polling for the object testResult. A
value of 'inProgress(3)' will result if the test is
still in progress. Once the test is completed, the
object testResult will have a value of 'success(2)' if
the loopback OAM cell returned to the originator of the
test within 5 seconds, if not, a value of 'failed(7)'
will result. If the ATM system does not support this
type of loopback test, then a value of
'notSupported(4)' will be provided. Other possible
values for the testResult object are 'unAbleToRun(5)'
and 'aborted(6)'."
::= { atmLoopbackTestTypes 5 }
atmLoopbackVcLocationId OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This is a loopback test performed on a portion of a
designated Vc segment. To perform this test a loopback
OAM cell is inserted at a connection point of the
designated VC connection (e.g., the end-point or a
tandem point) with a value inserted in the Location
Identifier ID field of the OAM cell that corresponds to
the ATM device where the cell is to be looped back.
The loopback cell then travels through the VC
connection until it reaches the designated ATM device,
where it is looped back to the loopback cell insertion
point on the designated VC. Success is achieved if the
loopback OAM cell returns to the originating point of
insertion within 5 seconds, otherwise, the test fails.
The manager-station performs a loopback test by making
use of the testTable defined in [22]. In order to run
this test the object testType in the testTable shall be
set to atmLoopbackVcE2e. The object testTarget points
to the row in the atmVclTable in [16] corresponding to
the VC designated for the test. The object testMoreInfo
contains the desired Loopback Location ID.
Before starting a test, a manager-station must first
obtain 'ownership' of the entry in the testTable for
the interface to be tested (follow procedure defined in
[22]). Once the manager-station obtains ownership, a
loopback test for a given interface can be invoked by
first setting up parameters necessary for the loopback
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
test (e.g., set testMoreInfo to AAAABBBBCCCCDDDD and
set the testTarget), and then setting the value of
testType in the testTable equal to
'atmLoopbackVcSegment.d'. The testRowStatus is used to
invoke the atmLoopbackVcLocationId test on the VC with
the VPI/VCI corresponding to the testTarget and looped
back at loopback location ID= AAAABBBBCCCCDDDD.
After invoking a loopback test, wait for the test
completion by polling for the object testResult. A
value of 'inProgress(3)' will result if the test is
still in progress. Once the test is completed, the
object testResult will have a value of 'success(2)' if
the loopback OAM cell returned to the originator of the
test within 5 seconds, if not, a value of 'failed(7)'
will result. If the ATM system does not support this
type of loopback test, then a value of
'notSupported(4)' will be provided. Other possible
values for the testResult object are 'unAbleToRun(5)'
and 'aborted(6)'."
::= { atmLoopbackTestTypes 6 }
atmLoopbackVpServiceInternal OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This is a loopback test that the manager requests an
agent to perform over the managed resource's internal
portion of a designated VP (i.e., between the ingress
and egress interfaces of the VP connection). The agent
is provided with the Ingress VPI, Egress Interface, and
Egress VPI in order to run this internal test. This
test may be useful in proxy situations where the proxy
agent represents a network. Implementations of this
test may be specific to the managed resource. One
implementation in a managed network may be as follows,
the managed network inserts a segment loopback OAM cell
at the network internal segment end-point
(corresponding to the ingress connection point) for the
designated VP connection. The loopback cell then
travels through the network's portion of the VP
connection until it reaches the networks connection
point to the egress, where it is looped back to the
network's cell insertion point on the designated VP.
Success is achieved if the loopback OAM cell returns to
the originating internal network segment end-point
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
within 5 seconds, otherwise, the test fails.
The manager-station performs a loopback test by making
use of the testTable defined in [22]. In order to run
this test the object testType in the testTable shall be
set to atmLoopbackVpServiceInternal, and the object
testTarget points to the row in the
atmVpCrossConnectTable in [16] corresponding to the VP
designated for the test.
Before starting a test, a manager-station must first
obtain 'ownership' of the entry in the testTable for
the interface to be tested (follow procedure defined in
[22]). Once the manager-station obtains ownership, a
loopback test for a given interface can be invoked by
first setting up parameters necessary for the loopback
test (e.g., set the testTarget), and then setting the
value of testType in the testTable equal to
'atmLoopbackVpServiceInternal' The testRowStatus is
used to invoke the atmLoopbackVpServiceInternal test on
the VP crossconnect with the ingress and egress VPI
values corresponding to the testTarget.
After invoking a loopback test, wait for the test
completion by polling for the object testResult. A
value of 'inProgress(3)' will result if the test is
still in progress. Once the test is completed, the
object testResult will have a value of 'success(2)' if
the loopback OAM cell returned to the originator of the
test within 5 seconds, if not, a value of 'failed(7)'
will result. If the ATM system does not support this
type of loopback test, then a value of
'notSupported(4)' will be provided. Other possible
values for the testResult object are 'unAbleToRun(5)'
and 'aborted(6)'."
::= { atmLoopbackTestTypes 7 }
atmLoopbackVcServiceInternal OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This is a loopback test that the manager requests an
agent to perform over the managed resource's internal
portion of a designated VC (i.e., between the ingress
and egress interfaces of the VC connection). The agent
is provided with the Ingress VPI, Ingress VCI, Egress
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
Interface, Egress VPI, and Egress VCI in order to run
this internal test. This test may be useful in proxy
situations where the proxy agent represents a network.
Implementations of this test may be specific to the
managed resource. One implemenation in a managed
network may be as follows, the managed network inserts
a segment loopback OAM cell at the network internal
segment end-point (corresponding to the ingress
connection point) for the designated VC connection.
The loopback cell then travels through the network's
portion of the VC connection until it reaches the
network's connection point to the egress, where it is
looped back to the network's cell insertion point on
the designated VC. Success is achieved if the loopback
OAM cell returns to the originating internal network
segment end-point within 5 seconds, otherwise, the test
fails.
The manager-station performs a loopback test by making
use of the testTable defined in [22]. In order to run
this test the object testType in the testTable shall be
set to atmLoopbackVcServiceInternal, and the object
testTarget points to the row in the
atmVcCrossConnectTable in [16] corresponding to the VC
designated for the test.
Before starting a test, a manager-station must first
obtain 'ownership' of the entry in the testTable for
the interface to be tested (follow procedure defined in
[22]). Once the manager-station obtains ownership, a
loopback test for a given interface can be invoked by
first setting up parameters necessary for the loopback
test (e.g., set the testTarget), and then setting the
value of testType in the testTable equal to
'atmLoopbackVcServiceInternal'. The testRowStatus is
used to invoke the atmLoopbackVcServiceInternal test on
the VC crossconnect with the ingress and egress VPI/VCI
values corresponding to the testTarget.
After invoking a loopback test, wait for the test
completion by polling for the object testResult. A
value of 'inProgress(3)' will result if the test is
still in progress. Once the test is completed, the
object testResult will have a value of 'success(2)' if
the loopback OAM cell returned to the originator of the
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
test within 5 seconds, if not, a value of 'failed(7)'
will result. If the ATM system does not support this
type of loopback test, then a value of
'notSupported(4)' will be provided. Other possible
values for the testResult object are 'unAbleToRun(5)'
and 'aborted(6)'."
::= { atmLoopbackTestTypes 8 }
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
-- ************************************************
-- (2) ATM End-Point Tables
-- This concerns information for interfaces
-- supporting ATM Loopback Tests and includes:
-- 1. ATM VP End-Point Table
-- 2. ATM VC End-Point Table
atmEndptGroup OBJECT IDENTIFIER::= {
atmTESTMIBObjects 2}
-- 1. ATM VP End-Point Table
atmVplEndptTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF AtmVplEndptEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"End-point Information for each VP."
::= { atmEndptGroup 1 }
atmVplEndptEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX AtmVplEndptEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry with end-point information about the ATM
VP."
AUGMENTS { atmVplEntry }
::= { atmVplEndptTable 1 }
AtmVplEndptEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
atmVplEndptSegmentEndPoint INTEGER
}
atmVplEndptSegmentEndPoint OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
isaVplSegmentEndPoint(1),
notaVplSegmentEndPoint(2)
}
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An indication of whether or not the VP interface
has been configured to represent a VPC Segment
End-Point. If the corresponding VP Link is a UNI,
the value of this object is permanently set to
isaVplSegmentEndPoint(1). Otherwise, the default
is set to notaVplSegmentEndPoint(2)."
::= { atmVplEndptEntry 1 }
-- 2. ATM VC End-Point Table
atmVclEndptTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF AtmVclEndptEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"End-point Information for each VC."
::= { atmEndptGroup 2 }
atmVclEndptEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX AtmVclEndptEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry with end-point information about the ATM
VC."
AUGMENTS { atmVclEntry }
::= { atmVclEndptTable 1 }
AtmVclEndptEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
atmVclEndptSegmentEndPoint INTEGER
}
atmVclEndptSegmentEndPoint OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
isaVclSegmentEndPoint(1),
notaVclSegmentEndPoint(2)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An indication of whether or not the VC interface
has been configured to represent a VCC Segment
End-Point. If the corresponding VC Link is a UNI,
the value of this object is permanently set to
isaVclSegmentEndPoint(1). Otherwise, the default
is set to notaVclSegmentEndPoint(2)."
::= { atmVclEndptEntry 1 }
-- ************************************************
-- Conformance Information
atmTESTMIBConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {atmTESTMIB 2}
atmTESTMIBGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::= {atmTESTMIBConformance 1}
atmTESTMIBCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::= {atmTESTMIBConformance 2}
-- Compliance Statements
atmTESTMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for SNMP entities which
represent ATM interfaces. The compliance statements
are used to determine if a particular group or object
applies to hosts, networks/switches, or both."
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS { atmLoopbackGroup }
-- Objects in the ATM Loopback Test Group
OBJECT atmLoopbackID
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required. This object is
required for ATM systems supporting the
atmLoopbackVpLocationID and atmLoopbackVcLocationID
tests."
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
OBJECT atmVplEndptSegmentEndPoint
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required. This object is
mandatory for systems that are supporting ATM loopback
tests."
OBJECT atmVclEndptSegmentEndPoint
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required. This object is
mandatory for systems that are supporting ATM loopback
tests."
::= { atmTESTMIBCompliances 1 }
-- **********************************************
-- Units of Conformance
atmLoopbackGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
atmLoopbackID,
atmVplEndptSegmentEndPoint,
atmVclEndptSegmentEndPoint
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A collection of objects providing information
for Loopback Tests."
::= { atmTESTMIBGroups 1 }
END
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
6. Acknowledgments
This document is a product of the AToMMIB Working Group. The
authors would like to acknowledge Dawn Xie for her valuable
suggestions for this memo.
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
7. References
[1] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An
Architecture for Describing SNMP Management Frameworks",
RFC 2271, Cabletron Systems, Inc., BMC Software, Inc.,
IBM T. J. Watson Research, January 1998
[2] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and
Identification of Management Information for TCP/IP-based
Internets", RFC 1155, Performance Systems International,
Hughes LAN Systems, May 1990
[3] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions",
RFC 1212, Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN
Systems, March 1991
[4] M. Rose, "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with
the SNMP", RFC 1215, Performance Systems International,
March 1991
[5] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M.,
and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information
for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol
(SNMPv2)", RFC 1902, SNMP Research,Inc., Cisco Systems,
Inc., Dover Beach Consulting, Inc., International Network
Services, January 1996.
[6] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M.,
and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for Version 2 of
the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC
1903, SNMP Research, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Dover
Beach Consulting, Inc., International Network Services,
January 1996.
[7] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M.,
and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for Version 2
of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC
1904, SNMP Research, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Dover
Beach Consulting, Inc., International Network Services,
January 1996.
[8] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin,
"Simple Network Management Protocol", RFC 1157, SNMP
Research, Performance Systems International, Performance
Systems International, MIT Laboratory for Computer
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
Science, May 1990.
[9] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M.,
and S. Waldbusser, "Introduction to Community-based
SNMPv2", RFC 1901, SNMP Research, Inc., Cisco Systems,
Inc., Dover Beach Consulting, Inc., International Network
Services, January 1996.
[10] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M.,
and S. Waldbusser, "Transport Mappings for Version 2 of
the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC
1906, SNMP Research, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Dover
Beach Consulting, Inc., International Network Services,
January 1996.
[11] Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R., and B. Wijnen,
"Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2272, SNMP
Research, Inc., Cabletron Systems, Inc., BMC Software,
Inc., IBM T. J. Watson Research, January 1998.
[12] Blumenthal, U., and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model
(USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMPv3)", RFC 2274, IBM T. J. Watson Research,
January 1998.
[13] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M.,
and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol Operations for Version 2 of
the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC
1905, SNMP Research, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Dover
Beach Consulting, Inc., International Network Services,
January 1996.
[14] Levi, D., Meyer, P., and B. Stewart, SNMPv3
Applications", RFC 2273, SNMP Research, Inc., Secure
Computing Corporation, Cisco Systems, January 1998.
[15] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R., and K. McCloghrie, "View-based
Access Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2275, IBM T. J. Watson
Research, BMC Software, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc.,
January 1998.
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
[16] Kaj Tesink, "Definitions of Managed Objects for ATM
Management", RFC 2515, Bellcore, February 1999.
[17] McCloghrie, K., and M. Rose, Editors, "Management
Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based
internets: MIB-II", STD 17, RFC 1213, Hughes LAN Systems,
Performance Systems International, March 1991.
[18] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group
MIB", RFC2233, cisco Systems, FTP Software, November
1997.
[19] ATM Forum, "ATM User-Network Interface, Version 3.0 (UNI
3.0) Specification, Part I", 1994.
[20] ATM Forum, "ATM User-Network Interface, Version 3.1 (UNI
3.1) Specification, Part I", November 1994.
[21] ITU-T Recommendation I.610, "Broadband Integrated Service
Digital Network (B-ISDN) Operation and Maintenance
Principles and Functions", July 1995.
[22] McCloghrie, K., M. Greene, and K. Tesink, "Definitions of
Managed Objects for System and Interface Testing",
RFCxxxx, cisco Systems, Xedia Corp, Telcordia, ???? 1999.
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
8. Security Considerations
There are a number of management objects defined in this MIB
that have a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-
create. Such objects may be considered sensitive or
vulnerable in some network environments. The support for SET
operations in a non-secure environment without proper
protection can have a negative effect on network operations.
The managed objects in this MIB contain sensitive information
since, collectively, they allow the invocation of tests on the
managed device.
This MIB contains objects which allow an administrator to
perform tests on ATM interfaces. Tests can only be performed
when using these objects in conjunction with [22].
Unauthorized access to the associated objects could cause a
denial of service, or in combination with other (e.g.,
physical) security breaches, could cause unauthorized
connectivity to a device. The tests defined in this document
are not service interrupting.
It is thus important to control even GET access to these
objects and possibly to even encrypt the values of these
object when sending them over the network via SNMP. Not all
versions of SNMP provide features for such a secure
environment.
SNMPv1 by itself is not a secure environment. Even if the
network itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), even
then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is
allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the
objects in this MIB.
It is recommended that the implementers consider the security
features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework. Specifically,
the use of the User-based Security Model RFC 2274 [12] and the
View-based Access Control Model RFC 2275 [15] is recommended.
It is then a customer/user responsibility to ensure that the
SNMP entity giving access to an instance of this MIB, is
properly configured to give access to the objects only to
those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to indeed
GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
9. Authors' Addresses
Michael Noto
3Com Corporation
5400 Bayfront Plaza
Santa Clara, CA 95052
Phone: (408) 326-2218
E-mail: mike_noto@3com.com
Kaj Tesink
Telcordia Technologies
331 Newman Springs Road
P.O. Box 7020
Red Bank, NJ 07701-7020
Phone: (732) 758-5254
EMail: kaj@research.telcordia.com
10. RFC Editor and IANA Considerations
Prior to publication of this memo as an RFC, the RFC Editor
and IANA are requested to make a suitable OBJECT IDENTIFIER
assignment for this MIB module (the value for XX below) and
update the following in the MIB:
::= { mib-2 XX }
-- ******** NOTE TO THE RFC EDITOR / IANA ***********
-- * Before this module is put on the standards track
-- * assign XX by IANA.
-- * remove this notice from the MIB
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
11. Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of
any intellectual property or other rights that might be
claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the
technology described in this document or the extent to which
any license under such rights might or might not be available;
neither does it represent that it has made any effort to
identify any such rights. Information on the IETF's
procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11.
Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and
any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result
of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission
for the use of such proprietary rights by implementors or
users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF
Secretariat.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its
attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or
other proprietary rights which may cover technology that may
be required to practice this standard. Please address the
information to the IETF Executive Director.
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
12. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights
Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and
furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or
otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be
prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in
part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above
copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such
copies and derivative works. However, this document itself
may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the
copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or
other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose
of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures
for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must
be followed, or as required to translate it into languages
other than English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will
not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or
assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided
on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE
USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR
ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Table of Contents
1 Status of this Memo ................................... 1
2 Abstract .............................................. 2
3 The SNMP Network Management Framework ................. 2
4 Overview .............................................. 4
4.1 Background .......................................... 4
4.2 Terminology ......................................... 5
4.3 Supported Functions ................................. 6
4.3.1 ATM Loopback Testing .............................. 6
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft ATM Test Objects April 7, 1999
4.3.2 ATM End-Point Tables .............................. 10
5 Definitions ........................................... 11
6 Acknowledgments ....................................... 29
7 References ............................................ 30
8 Security Considerations ............................... 33
9 Authors' Addresses .................................... 34
10 RFC Editor and IANA Considerations ................... 34
11 Intellectual Property ................................ 35
12 Full Copyright Statement ............................. 36
Expires October 7, 1999 [Page 37]
