Audio/Video Transport                                         M. Romaine
Internet-Draft                                               M. Hatanaka
Expires: December 3, 2005                                   J. Matsumoto
                                                                    SONY
                                                               June 2005


                  RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family
                   draft-ietf-avt-rtp-atrac-family-04

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on December 3, 2005.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

Abstract

   This document describes an RTP payload format for efficient and
   flexible transporting of audio data encoded with the Adaptive
   TRansform Audio Codec (ATRAC) family of codecs.  Recent enhancements
   to the ATRAC family of codecs support high quality audio coding with
   multiple channels.  The RTP payload format as presented in this
   document also includes support for data fragmentation, elementary
   redundancy measures, and a variation on scalable streaming.



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   2.  Conventions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   3.  Codec Specific Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   4.  RTP Packetization and Transport of ATRAC-Family Streams  . . .  5
     4.1   ATRAC Frames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     4.2   Concatenation of Frames  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     4.3   Frame Fragmentation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     4.4   Transmission of Redundant Frames . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     4.5   Global Structure of Payload Format . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     4.6   Scalable Lossless Streaming (High-Speed Transfer mode) . .  6
       4.6.1   Scalable Multiplexed Streaming . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
       4.6.2   Scalable Multi-Session Streaming . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   5.  Payload Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     5.1   Usage of RTP Header Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     5.2   RTP Payload Structure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
       5.2.1   ATRAC Header Section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
       5.2.2   Redundant Data Section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
       5.2.3   ATRAC Frames Section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   6.  Packetization Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     6.1   Example Multi-frame Packet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     6.2   Example Fragmented ATRAC Frame . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   7.  Payload Format Parameters  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
     7.1   ATRAC3 MIME Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
     7.2   ATRAC-X MIME Registraion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
     7.3   ATRAC Advanced Lossless MIME Registration  . . . . . . . . 15
     7.4   Channel Mapping Configuration Table  . . . . . . . . . . . 17
     7.5   Mapping MIME Parameters into SDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
       7.5.1   For MIME subtype ATRAC3  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
       7.5.2   For MIME subtype ATRAC-X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
       7.5.3   For MIME subtype ATRAC Advanced Lossless . . . . . . . 19
     7.6   Offer-Answer Model Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
       7.6.1   For All Three MIME Subtypes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
       7.6.2   For MIME subtype ATRAC3  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
       7.6.3   For MIME subtype ATRAC-X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
       7.6.4   For MIME subtype ATRAC Advanced Lossless . . . . . . . 21
     7.7   Usage of declarative SDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
     7.8   Example SDP Session Descriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
     7.9   Example Offer-Answer Exchange  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
   8.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
   9.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
     9.1   Confidentiality  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
     9.2   Authentication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
     9.3   Decoding Validation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
   10.   References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
     10.1  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
     10.2  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


       Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
       Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . 28

















































Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


1.  Introduction

   The ATRAC family of perceptual audio codecs are designed to address
   numerous needs for high-quality, low bit-rate audio transfer.  ATRAC
   technology can be found in many consumer and professional products
   and applications, including MD players, CD players, voice recorders,
   and mobile phones.  The need for real-time streaming of audio data
   has grown, and this document details our efforts in increasing the
   product and application space for the ATRAC family of codecs.

   Recent advances in ATRAC technology allow for multiple channels of
   audio to be encoded in customizable groupings.  This should allow for
   future expansions in scaled streaming.  To provide the greatest
   flexibility in streaming any one of the ATRAC family member codecs
   however, this payload format does not distinguish between the codecs
   on a packet level.

   This simplified payload format contains only the basic information
   needed to disassemble a packet of ATRAC audio in order to decode it.
   Timestamps are in sample units, with audio data currently encoded
   into frames of 512, 1024 or 2048 samples depending on the ATRAC
   version.  There is also basic support for fragmentation and
   redundancy, as ATRAC frames MAY exceed an MTU size of 1500 octets.

   Although streaming of multi-channel audio is supported depending on
   the ATRAC version used, all encoded audio for a given time period is
   contained within a single frame.  Therefore, there is no interleaving
   nor splitting of audio data on a per-channel basis to be concerned
   with.

2.  Conventions

   The key words "MUST, "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [4].

3.  Codec Specific Details

   Early versions of the ATRAC codec handled only two channels of audio
   at 44.1kHz sampling frequency, with typical bit-rates between 66kbps
   and 132kbps.  The latest version allows for a maximum 8 channels of
   audio, up to 96kHz in sampling frequency, and a lossless encoding
   option which can be transmitted in either a scalable (also known as
   High-Speed Transfer mode) or standard (aka Standard mode) format.
   The feasible bit-rate range has also expanded, allowing from a low of
   8kbps up to 1400kbps in lossy encoding modes.

   Depending on the version of ATRAC used, the sample-frame size is



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   either 512, 1024 or 2048 samples.  While the lossy and Standard mode
   lossless formats are encoded as sequential single audio frames, High-
   Speed Transfer mode lossless data comprises two layers -- a lossy
   base layer and an enhancement layer.

4.  RTP Packetization and Transport of ATRAC-Family Streams

4.1  ATRAC Frames

   For transportation of compressed audio data, ATRAC uses the concept
   of frames.  ATRAC frames are the smallest data unit for which timing
   information is attributed.  Frames are octect-aligned by definition.

4.2  Concatenation of Frames

   It is often possible to carry multiple frames in one RTP packet.
   This can be useful in audio, where on a LAN with a 1500 byte MTU, an
   average of 7 complete 64kbps ATRAC frames could be carried in a
   single RTP packet, as each ATRAC frame would be approximately 200
   bytes.  ATRAC frames may be of fixed or variable length.  To
   facilitate parsing in the case of multiple frames in one RTP packet,
   the size of each frame is made known to the receiver by carrying "in
   band" the frame size for each contained frame in an RTP packet.
   However, to simplify the implementation of RTP receivers, it is
   required that when multiple frames are carried in an RTP packet, each
   frame MUST be complete, i.e., the number of frames in an RTP packet
   MUST be integral.

4.3  Frame Fragmentation

   The ATRAC codec can handle very large frames.  As most IP networks
   have significantly smaller MTU sizes than the frame sizes ATRAC can
   handle, this payload format allows for the fragmentation of an ATRAC
   frame over multiple RTP packets.  However, to simplify the
   implementation of RTP receivers, an RTP packet SHALL either carry one
   or more complete ATRAC frames or a single fragment of one ATRAC
   frame.  In other words, RTP packets MUST NOT contain fragments of
   multiple ATRAC frames and MUST NOT contain a mix of complete and
   fragmented frames.

4.4  Transmission of Redundant Frames

   As RTP does not guarantee reliable transmission, receipt of data is
   not assured.  Loss of a packet can result in a "decoding gap" by the
   receiver.  One method to remedy this problem is to allow time-shifted
   copies of ATRAC frames to be sent along with current data.  For a
   modest cost in latency and implementation complexity, error
   resiliency to packet loss can be achieved.



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


4.5  Global Structure of Payload Format

   The RTP payload following the RTP header contains three octet-aligned
   data sections, of which the second MAY be empty:

   +------+--------------+--------------+--------------+
   |RTP   | ATRAC Header | Redundant    | ATRAC Frames |
   |Header| Section      | Data Section | Section      |
   +------+--------------+--------------+--------------+
           < ----------- RTP Packet Payload --------- >

   The first data section is the ATRAC Header, containing just one
   header with information for the whole packet.  The second section is
   for redundant ATRAC frames; this section MAY be empty.  The third
   section is where the encoded ATRAC frames are stored.  This may
   contain either a single fragment of one ATRAC frame, or one or more
   complete ATRAC frames.  The ATRAC Frames Section MUST NOT be empty.

   To benefit from ATRAC's High-Speed Transfer mode lossless encoding
   capability, the RTP payload can be split across two sessions, with
   one transmitting an essential base layer and the other transmitting
   enhancement data.  However in either case, the above structure still
   applies.

4.6  Scalable Lossless Streaming (High-Speed Transfer mode)

   As ATRAC supports a variation on scalable encoding, this payload
   format provides a mechanism for transmitting essential data (also
   referred to as the base layer) with its enhancement data in two ways
   -- multiplexed through one session or separated over two sessions.
   In either method, only the base layer is essential in producing audio
   data.  The enhancement layer carries the remaining audio data needed
   to decode lossless audio data.  So in situations of limited
   bandwidth, the sender may choose not to transmit enhancement data yet
   still provide a client with enough data to generate lossily-encoded
   audio through the base layer.

4.6.1  Scalable Multiplexed Streaming

   In multiplexed streaming, the base layer and enhancement layer are
   coupled together in each packet, utilizing only one session.  While
   the packet may begin with either layer type, the two layer types MUST
   interleave.

   +----------------+  +----------------+  +----------------+
   |Base|Enhancement|--|Base|Enhancement|--|Base|Enhancement| ...
   +----------------+  +----------------+  +----------------+
           N                   N+1                 N+2          : Packet



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


4.6.2  Scalable Multi-Session Streaming

   In multi-session streaming, the base layer and enhancement layer are
   sent over two seperate sessions, allowing clients with certain
   bandwidth limitations to receive just the base layer for decoding.
   While there may be alternative methods for synchronization of the
   layers, it is RECOMMENDED that the timestamp be used for
   synchronizing the base layer with its enhancement.  Applications can
   determine which sessions are paired together through use of the
   Session Description Protocol (SDP) (RFC 2327) [2].  Further details
   are discussed in the section titled "Usage of declarative SDP".

   Session 1:
   +------+  +------+  +------+  +------+
   | Base |--| Base |--| Base |--| Base | ...
   +------+  +------+  +------+  +------+
      N         N+1       N+2       N+3     : Packet

   Session 2:
   +-------------+  +-------------+  +-------------+
   | Enhancement |--| Enhancement |--| Enhancement | ...
   +-------------+  +-------------+  +-------------+
         N                N+1              N+2         : Packet


5.  Payload Format

5.1  Usage of RTP Header Fields

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |V=2|P|X|  CC   |M|     PT      |       sequence number         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                          timestamp                            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |            synchronization source (SSRC) identifier           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |           contributing source (CSRC) identifiers              |
     |                             .....                             |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Marker (M): 1 bit
   Set to zero as silence suppression is currently not used.

   Payload Type (PT): 7 bits
   The assignment of an RTP payload type for this packet format is
   outside the scope of this document; it is specified by the RTP



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005                [Page 7]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   profile under which this payload format is used, or signaled
   dynamically out-of-band (e.g., using SDP).

   Timestamp: 32 bits
   A timestamp representing the sampling time of the first sample of the
   first ATRAC frame in the RTP packet.  When using SDP, the clock rate
   of the RTP timestamp MUST be expressed using the "rtpmap" attribute.
   For ATRAC3 the RTP timestamp rate MUST be 44100Hz.  For ATRAC-X the
   RTP timestamp rate is defined out-of-band.

5.2  RTP Payload Structure

5.2.1  ATRAC Header Section

   The ATRAC family payload header is one byte.

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |C|FrgNo|NFrames|
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Continuous flag (C): 1 bit
   Set to 1 if this is part of a fragmented packet.  The last packet in
   a series would have this bit set to 0.

   Fragment Number (FrgNo): 3 bits
   In the event of data fragmentation, this value is 1 for the first
   packet, and increases sequentially for the remaining fragmented data
   packets.

   Number of Frames (NFrames): 4 bits
   The number of frames in this packet.  This allows for a maximum of 16
   ATRAC-encoded audio frames per packet, with 0 indicating one frame.
   Each frame must be complete.  Only the first frame is allowed to be
   fragmented, in which case this MUST NOT be anything other than 0 for
   subsequent packets containing the fragmented frame.

5.2.2  Redundant Data Section

   The Redundant Data Section provides a rudimentary mechanism to
   compensate for occasional packet loss.  As every packet's timestamp
   corresponds to the first audio frame regardless of whether it is
   redundant or not, and because we know how many frames of audio each
   packet encapsulates, if two successive packets are successfully
   transmitted, we can calculate the number of redundant frames being
   sent.  The result gives the client a sense of how the server is
   responding to RTCP reports and to expand its buffer size if
   necessary.



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005                [Page 8]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   As an example of using the Redundant Data Section, refer to Figure 1.
   In this example, the server has determined that for the next few
   number of packets, it should send the last two frames from the
   previous packet due to recent RTCP reports.  Thus, between packets N
   and N+1, there is a redundancy of two frames (which the client may
   choose to dispose of).  The benefit arises when packets N+2 and N+3
   do not arrive at all, after which eventually packet N+4 arrives with
   successive necessary audio frame data.  This field SHOULD NOT be used
   in packets containing fragmented data.

    |-Fr1-|-Fr2-|-Fr3-|                             Packet N,   TS=1
          |-Fr2-|-Fr3-|-Fr4-|                       Packet N+1, TS=2
                            |-Fr5-|-Fr6-|-Fr7-|     Packet N+4, TS=5


5.2.3  ATRAC Frames Section

   The ATRAC Frames Section contains an integer number of complete ATRAC
   frames or a single fragment of one ATRAC frame.  Each ATRAC frame is
   preceeded by a one-bit flag indicating the layer type and a Block
   Length field indicating the size in bytes of the ATRAC frame.  If
   more than one ATRAC frame is present, then the frames are
   concatenated into a contiguous string of bit-flag, Block Length, and
   ATRAC frame.  This section MUST NOT be empty.

      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |E|       Block Length          |         ATRAC frame           |...
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Layer Type Flag: 1 bit
   Set to 1 if the corresponding ATRAC frame is from an enhancement
   layer. 0 indicates a base layer encoded frame.

   Block length: 15 bits
   The byte length of encoded audio data for the following frame.  This
   is so that in the case of fragmentation, if only a subsequent packet
   is received, decoding can still occur. 15 bits allows for a maximum
   block length of 32,767 bytes.  If there are multiple frames in a
   packet, a block-length field exists before each frame data.

   ATRAC frame: The encoded ATRAC audio data.

5.2.3.1  Frame Fragmentation

   Each RTP packet SHALL contain either an integer number of ATRAC
   encoded audio frames (with a maximum of 16), or one ATRAC frame
   fragment.  In the former case, as many complete ATRAC frames as can



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005                [Page 9]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   fit in a single path-MTU SHOULD be placed in an RTP packet.  However,
   if even a single ATRAC frame will not fit into a complete RTP packet,
   the ATRAC frame SHOULD be fragmented.

   The start of a fragmented frame gets placed in its own RTP packet,
   its Continuous bit (C) set to one, and its Fragment Number (FragNo)
   set to one.  As the frame must be the only one in the packet, the
   Number of Frames field is zero.  Subsequent packets are to contain
   the remaining fragmented frame data, with the Fragment Number
   increasing sequentially and the Continuous bit (C) consistently set
   to one.  As subsequent packets do not contain any new frames, the
   Number of Frames field SHOULD be ignored.  The last packet of
   fragmented data MUST have the Continuous bit (C) set to zero.

   In addition to the Continuous bit and Fragment Number fields
   indicating fragmentation and a means to reorder the packets, the
   timestamp can be used to determine which packets go together.  Thus,
   packets containing related fragmented frames MUST have identical
   timestamps.

   In the event of fragmentation, the basic redundancy measures MUST NOT
   be used.  This means the Frame Offset field MUST be ignored.

6.  Packetization Examples

6.1  Example Multi-frame Packet

   Multiple encoded audio frames are combined into one packet.  Note how
   for this example, only base layer frames are sent redundantly, but
   are followed by interleaved base layer and enhancement layer frames.





















Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 10]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |V=2|P|X|  CC   |M|     PT      |       sequence number         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                          timestamp                            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |            synchronization source (SSRC) identifier           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |           contributing source (CSRC) identifiers              |
     |                             .....                             |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |0|  0  |   5   |0|         Block Length        |               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |         (redundant)  base layer frame 1 data...               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |0|       Block Length          |(redundant) base layer frame 2 |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |    (cont.)  |0|   Block Length          |  base layer frame 3 |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | (cont.) |1|       Block Length          |  enhancment frame 3 |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |0|       Block Length          |     base layer frame 4...     |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+



6.2  Example Fragmented ATRAC Frame

   The encoded audio data frame is split over three RTP packets.  The
   following points are highlighted in the example below:

   o  transition from one to zero of the Continuous bit (C)

   o  sequential increase in the Fragment Number



     Packet 1:
      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |V=2|P|X|  CC   |M|     PT      |       sequence number         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                          timestamp                            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |            synchronization source (SSRC) identifier           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 11]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


     |           contributing source (CSRC) identifiers              |
     |                             .....                             |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |1|  1  |   0   |1|        Block Length         |               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     enhancement data...                       |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

     Packet 2:
      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |V=2|P|X|  CC   |M|     PT      |       sequence number         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                          timestamp                            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |            synchronization source (SSRC) identifier           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |           contributing source (CSRC) identifiers              |
     |                             .....                             |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |1|  2  |   0   |1|        Block Length         |               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                  ...more enhancement data...                  |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

     Packet 3:
      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |V=2|P|X|  CC   |M|     PT      |       sequence number         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                          timestamp                            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |            synchronization source (SSRC) identifier           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |           contributing source (CSRC) identifiers              |
     |                             .....                             |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |0|  3  |   0   |1|        Block Length         |               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |            ...the last of the enhancement data                |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


7.  Payload Format Parameters

   Certain parameters will need to be defined before ATRAC family



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 12]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   encoded content can be streamed.  Other optional parameters may also
   be defined to take advantage of specific features relevant to certain
   ATRAC versions.  Parameters for ATRAC3, ATRAC-X, and ATRAC Advanced
   Lossless are defined here as part of the MIME subtype registration
   process.  A mapping of these parameters into the Session Description
   Protocol (SDP) (RFC 2327) [2] is also provided for applications that
   utilize SDP.

   The data format and parameters are specified for real-time transport
   in RTP.

7.1  ATRAC3 MIME Registration

   The MIME subtype for the Adaptive TRansform Codec version 3 (ATRAC3)
   is allocated from the Vendor tree since this codec is intended to be
   used with commercial products, and use of any ATRAC family codec
   requires a license from Sony Corporation, the vendor.

   Note, any unspecified parameter MUST be ignored by the receiver.

   Media Type name:  audio

   Media subtype name:  vnd.sony.atrac3

   Required parameters:

   baseLayer:  Indicates the encoded bit-rate for the audio data to be
   streamed.  Permissible values are 66, 105, and 132.

   Optional parameters:

   maxRedundantFrames:  The maximum number of redundant frames that may
   be sent during a session in any given packet under the redundant
   framing mechanism detailed in the draft.  Allowed values are integers
   in the range of 0 to 15, inclusive.  If this parameter is not used, a
   default of 15 MUST be assumed.

   maxptime: The maximum amount of media which can be encapsulated in
   each packet, expressed as time in milliseconds.  The time SHALL be
   calculated as the sum of the time the media present in the packet
   represents.  For frame based codecs, the time MUST be an integer
   multiple of the frame size.  If this parameter is not present, the
   sender MAY encapsulate a maximum of 16 encoded frames into one RTP
   packet.

   ptime:    see RFC 2327 [2]

   Encoding considerations: This type is defined for transfer via RTP



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 13]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   RFC 3550 [1].

   Security considerations:
   Please refer to section 7 of this draft.

   Public specifications:
   Please refer to section 7 of this draft.

   Macintosh file type code: none
   Object identifier or OID: none

   Person & email address to contact for further information:
   Mitsuyuki Hatanaka
   hatanaka@av.crl.sony.co.jp

   Intended usage: COMMON

   Author/Change controller:
   hatanaka@av.crl.sony.co.jp

7.2  ATRAC-X MIME Registraion

   The MIME subtype for the Adaptive TRansform Codec version X (ATRAC-X)
   is allocated from the Vendor tree since this codec is intended to be
   used with commercial products, and use of any ATRAC family codec
   requires a license from Sony Corporation, the vendor.

   Note, any unspecified parameter MUST be ignored by the receiver.

   Media Type name:  audio

   Media subtype name:  vnd.sony.atrac-x

   Required parameters:

   sampleRate:  Represents the sampling frequency in Hz of the original
   audio data.  Permissible values are 32000, 44100, 48000, 88200,
   96000.

   baseLayer:  Indicates the encoded bit-rate for the audio data to be
   streamed.  Permissible values are 48, 64, 96, 128, 160, 192, 256, and
   320.

   channelID:  Indicates the number of channels and channel layout
   according to the table in Section 5.3.  Note that this layout is
   different from that proposed in RFC 3551 [3].  However, as channelID
   = 0 defines an ambiguous channel layout, the channel mapping defined
   in Section 4.1 of [3] could be used.  Permissible values are 0, 1, 2,



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 14]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   3, 4, 5, 6, 7.

   Optional parameters:

   maxRedundantFrames:  The maximum number of redundant frames that may
   be sent during a session in any given packet under the redundant
   framing mechanism detailed in the draft.  Allowed values are integers
   in the range 0 to 15, inclusive.  If this parameter is not used, a
   default of 15 MUST be assumed.

   delayMode:  Indicates a desire to use low-delay features, in which
   case the decoder will process received data accordingly based on this
   value.  Permissible values are 2 and 4.

   maxptime: The maximum amount of media which can be encapsulated in a
   payload packet, expressed as time in milliseconds.  The time is
   calculated as the sum of the time the media present in the packet
   represents.  The time MUST be a multiple of the frame size.  If this
   parameter is not present, the sender MAY encapsulate a maximum of 16
   encoded frames into one RTP packet.

   ptime:    see RFC 2327 [2]

   Encoding considerations: This type is defined for transfer via RTP
   (RFC 3550) [1].

   Security considerations:
   Please refer to section 7 of this draft.

   Public specifications:
   Please refer to section 7 of this draft.

   Macintosh file type code: none
   Object identifier or OID: none

   Person & email address to contact for further information:
   Mitsuyuki Hatanaka
   hatanaka@av.crl.sony.co.jp

   Intended usage: COMMON

   Author/Change controller:
   hatanaka@av.crl.sony.co.jp

7.3  ATRAC Advanced Lossless MIME Registration

   The MIME subtype for the Adaptive TRansform Codec Lossless version
   (ATRAC Advanced Lossless) is allocated from the Vendor tree since



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 15]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   this codec is intended to be used with commercial products, and use
   of any ATRAC family codec requires a license from Sony Corporation,
   the vendor.

   Note, any unspecified parameter MUST be ignored by the receiver.

   Media Type name:  audio

   Media subtype name:  vnd.sony.atrac-advanced-lossless

   Required parameters:

   sampleRate:  Represents the sampling frequency in Hz of the original
   audio data.  Permissible values are 32000, 44100, 48000, 88200,
   96000.

   baseLayer:  Indicates the encoded bit-rate for the base layer in
   High-Speed Transfer mode lossless encodings.  For Standard lossless
   mode this value MUST be 0.  Permissible values are 0, 48, 64, 66, 96,
   105, 128, 132, 160, 192, 256, and 320.

   blockLength: Indicates the block length being used for Standard
   lossless mode.  When "baseLayer=0", this value MUST be one of either
   512, 1024, or 2048.  If the "baseLayer" parameter is not "0", this
   parameter MUST be ignored.

   channelID:  Indicates the number of channels and channel layout
   according to the table in Section 5.3.  Note that this layout is
   different from that proposed in RFC 3551 [3].  However, as channelID
   = 0 defines an ambiguous channel layout, the channel mapping defined
   in Section 4.1 of [3] could be used.  Permissible values are 0, 1, 2,
   3, 4, 5, 6, 7.

   Optional parameters:

   maxRedundantFrames:  The maximum number of redundant frames that may
   be sent during a session in any given packet under the redundant
   framing mechanism detailed in the draft.  Allowed values are integers
   in the range 0 to 15, inclusive.  If this parameter is not used, a
   default of 15 MUST be assumed.

   maxptime: The maximum amount of media which can be encapsulated in a
   payload packet, expressed as time in milliseconds.  The time is
   calculated as the sum of the time the media present in the packet
   represents.  The time MUST be a multiple of the frame size.  If this
   parameter is not present, the sender MAY encapsulate a maximum of 16
   encoded frames into one RTP packet.




Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 16]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   ptime:    see RFC 2327 [2]

   Encoding considerations: This type is defined for transfer via RTP
   (RFC 3550) [1].

   Security considerations:
   Please refer to section 7 of this draft.

   Public specifications:
   Please refer to section 7 of this draft.

   Macintosh file type code: none
   Object identifier or OID: none

   Person & email address to contact for further information:
   Mitsuyuki Hatanaka
   hatanaka@av.crl.sony.co.jp

   Intended usage: COMMON

   Author/Change controller:
   hatanaka@av.crl.sony.co.jp

7.4  Channel Mapping Configuration Table

   The following is a table explaining the mapping between the channelID
   as passed during SDP negotiations, and the speaker mapping the value
   represents.























Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 17]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
               | channelID | Number of |  Default Speaker    |
               |           | Channels  |      Mapping        |
               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
               |     0     |  max 64   |     undefined       |
               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
               |     1     |     1     | front: center       |
               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
               |     2     |     2     | front: left, right  |
               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
               |     3     |     3     | front: left, right  |
               |           |           | front: center       |
               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
               |     4     |     4     | front: left, right  |
               |           |           | front: center       |
               |           |           | rear: surround      |
               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
               |     5     |    5+1    | front: left, right  |
               |           |           | front: center       |
               |           |           | rear: left, right   |
               |           |           | LFE                 |
               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
               |     6     |    6+1    | front: left, right  |
               |           |           | front: center       |
               |           |           | rear: left, right   |
               |           |           | rear: center        |
               |           |           | LFE                 |
               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
               |     7     |    7+1    | front: left, right  |
               |           |           | front: center       |
               |           |           | rear: left, right   |
               |           |           | side: left, right   |
               |           |           | LFE                 |
               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


7.5  Mapping MIME Parameters into SDP

   The information carried in the MIME media type specification has a
   specific mapping to fields in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
   [2], which is commonly used to describe RTP sessions.  When SDP is
   used to specify sessions employing the ATRAC family of codecs, the
   following mapping rules according to the ATRAC codec apply:

7.5.1  For MIME subtype ATRAC3

   o  The MIME type ("audio") goes in SDP "m=" as the media name




Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 18]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   o  The MIME subtype (payload format name) goes in SDP "a=rtpmap" as
      the encoding name.  ATRAC3 supports only mono or stereo signals,
      so a corresponding number of channels SHALL also be included in
      this attribute.

   o  The "baseLayer" parameter goes in SDP "a=fmtp".  This parameter
      MUST be present. "maxRedundantFrames" may follow, but if no value
      is transmitted, the receiver SHOULD assume a default value of
      "15".

   o  The parameters "ptime" and "maxptime" go in the SDP "a=ptime" and
      "a=maxptime" attributes, respectively.


7.5.2  For MIME subtype ATRAC-X

   o  The MIME type ("audio") goes in SDP "m=" as the media name

   o  The MIME subtype (payload format name) goes in SDP "a=rtpmap" as
      the encoding name.  This should be followed by the "sampleRate"
      (as the RTP clock rate), and then the actual number of channels
      regardless of the channelID parameter.

   o  The parameters "ptime" and "maxptime" go in the SDP "a=ptime" and
      "a=maxptime" attributes, respectively.

   o  Any remaining parameters go in the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute by
      copying them directly from the MIME media type string as a
      semicolon separated list of parameter=value pairs.  The
      "baseLayer" parameter must be the first entry on this line.  It is
      recommened that the "channelID" parameter be the next entry.  The
      receiver MUST assume a default value of "15" for
      "maxRedundantFrames".


7.5.3  For MIME subtype ATRAC Advanced Lossless

   o  The MIME type ("audio") goes in SDP "m=" as the media name

   o  The MIME subtype (payload format name) goes in SDP "a=rtpmap" as
      the encoding name.  This should be followed by the "sampleRate"
      (as the RTP clock rate), and then the actual number of channels
      regardless of the channelID parameter.

   o  The parameters "ptime" and "maxptime" go in the SDP "a=ptime" and
      "a=maxptime" attributes, respectively.





Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 19]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   o  Any remaining parameters go in the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute by
      copying them directly from the MIME media type string as a
      semicolon separated list of parameter=value pairs.  The
      "baseLayer" parameter must be the first entry on this line.  If
      "baseLayer=0", the "blockLength" parameter MUST follow and be one
      of either 512, 1024, or 2048.  It is recommended that the
      "channelID" parameter be the next entry.  The receiver MUST assume
      a default value of "15" for "maxRedundantFrames".


7.6  Offer-Answer Model Considerations

   Some options for encoding and decoding ATRAC audio data will require
   either or both the sender and receiver to comply with certain
   specifications.  In order to establish an interoperable transmission
   framework, an Offer-Answer negotiation in SDP should observe the
   following considerations:

7.6.1  For All Three MIME Subtypes

   o  Each combination of the RTP payload transport format configuration
      parameters (baseLayer and blockLength, sampleRate, channelID) is
      unique in its bit-pattern and not compatible with any other
      combination.  When creating an offer in an application desiring to
      use the more advanced features (sample rates above 44100kHz, more
      than two channels), the offerer is RECOMMENDED to also offer a
      payload type containing only the lowest set of necessary
      requirements.  If multiple configurations are of interest to the
      application they may all be offered, however care should be taken
      not to offer too many payload types.

   o  The parameters "maxptime" and "ptime" will in most cases not
      affect interoperability, however the setting of the parameters can
      affect the performance of the application.  The SDP offer-answer
      handling of the "ptime" parameter is described in RFC3264.  The
      "maxptime" parameter MUST be handled in the same way.


7.6.2  For MIME subtype ATRAC3

   o  In response to an offer, downgraded subsets of "baseLayer" are
      possible.  However for best performance, we suggest the answer
      contain the highest possible values offered.


7.6.3  For MIME subtype ATRAC-X





Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 20]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   o  When creating an offer with considerably high requirements (such
      as 8 channels at 96kHz), it is RECOMMENDED that the offer also
      contain a configuration with lower requirements (such as a stereo
      only option).  Although multiple alternative configurations may be
      offered, care should be taken not to offer too many payload types.

   o  In response to an offer, downgraded subsets of "sampleRate",
      "baseLayer", and "channelID" are possible.  For best performance,
      we suggest an answer SHALL NOT contain any values requiring
      further capabilities than the offer contains, but is RECOMMENDED
      to provide values as close as possible to those in the offer.

   o  The "maxRedundantFrames" is a suggested minimum.  This value MAY
      be increased in an answer (with a maximum of 15), but SHALL NOT be
      reduced.

   o  The optional parameter "delayMode" is non-negotiable.  If the
      Answerer cannot comply with the offered value, the session must be
      deemed inoperable.


7.6.4  For MIME subtype ATRAC Advanced Lossless

   o  When creating an offer with considerably high requirements (such
      as 8 channels at 96kHz), it is RECOMMENDED that the offer also
      contain a configuration with lower requirements (such as a stereo
      only option).  Although multiple alternative configurations may be
      offered, care should be taken not to offer too many payload types.

   o  In response to an offer, downgraded subsets of "sampleRate",
      "baseLayer", and "channelID" are possible.  For best performance,
      we suggest an answer SHALL NOT contain any values requiring
      further capabilities than the offer contains, but is RECOMMENDED
      to provide values as close as possible to those in the offer.

   o  There are no requirements when negotiating "blockLength", other
      than that both parties must be in agreement.

   o  The "maxRedundantFrames" is a suggested minimum.  This value MAY
      be increased in an answer (with a maximum of 15), but SHALL NOT be
      reduced.


7.7  Usage of declarative SDP

   In declarative usage, like SDP in RTSP [9] or SAP [10], the
   parameters SHALL be interpreted as follows:




Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 21]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   o  The payload format configuration parameters (baseLayer,
      sampleRate, channelID) are all declarative and a participant MUST
      use the configuration(s) that is provided for the session.  More
      than one configuration may be provided if necessary by declaring
      multiple RTP payload types, however the number of types should be
      kept small.

   o  Any "maxptime" and "ptime" values should be selected with care to
      ensure that the session's participants can achieve reasonable
      performance.

   For transmission of scalable multi-session streaming of ATRAC
   Advanced Lossless content, section 6 of the Session Description
   Protocol (RFC 2327) [2] defines attributes for notifying applications
   of hierarchically encoded streams.  For multicast sessions, the base
   layer and enhancement layer are transmitted over seperate multicast
   groups, thus requiring multiple multicast addresses.  For this
   scenario, SDP slash notation as defined in RFC 2327 [2] for the "c="
   field should be followed.  For IP unicast addresses, it will be
   necessary to specify multiple transport ports.  This is done with
   slash notation in the "m=" field similarly defined in RFC 2327 [2].

7.8  Example SDP Session Descriptions

   Example usage of ATRAC-X with stereo at 44100Hz:

   m=audio 49120 RTP/AVP 99
   a=rtpmap:99 ATRAC-X/44100/2
   a=fmtp:99 baseLayer=128; channelID=2; delayMode=2
   a=maxptime:20

   Example usage of ATRAC-X with 5.1 setup at 48000Hz:

   m=audio 49120 RTP/AVP 99
   a=rtpmap:99 ATRAC-X/48000/6
   a=fmtp:99 baseLayer=320; channelID=5
   a=maxptime:30

   Example usage of ATRAC-Advanced-Lossless in Standard mode:

   m=audio 49200 RTP/AVP 99
   a=rtpmap:99 ATRAC-ADVANCED-LOSSLESS/44100/2
   a=fmtp:99 baseLayer=0; blockLength=1024; channelID=2
   a=maxptime:30

   Example usage of ATRAC-Advanced-Lossless in High-Speed mode (note
   slash notation for multiple port-pairings):




Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 22]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   m=audio 49200/2 RTP/AVP 99
   a=rtpmap:99 ATRAC-ADVANCED-LOSSLESS/48000/2
   a=fmtp:99 baseLayer=128; blockLength=0; channelID=2
   a=maxptime:30

7.9  Example Offer-Answer Exchange

   The following Offer/Answer example shows how a desire to stream
   multi-channel content is turned down by the receiver, who answers
   with only the ability to receive stereo content:

   Offer:

   m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 98 99
   a=rtpmap:98 ATRAC-X/44100/6
   a=fmtp:98 baseLayer=320; channelID=5
   a=rtpmap:99 ATRAC-X/44100/6
   a=fmtp:99 baseLayer=160; channelID=5

   Answer:

   m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 99
   a=rtpmap:99 ATRAC-X/44100/2
   a=fmtp:99 baseLayer=160; channelID=2

   The following Offer/Answer example shows the receiver answering with
   a selection of supported parameters:

   Offer:

   m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 97 98 99
   a=rtpmap:97 ATRAC-X/44100/2
   a=fmtp:97 baseLayer=128; channelID=2
   a=rtpmap:98 ATRAC-X/44100/6
   a=fmtp:98 baseLayer=128; channelID=5
   a=rtpmap:99 ATRAC-X/48000/6
   a=fmtp:99 baseLayer=320; channelID=5

   Answer:

   m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 97 98
   a=rtpmap:97 ATRAC-X/44100/2
   a=fmtp:97 baseLayer=128; channelID=2
   a=rtpmap:98 ATRAC-X/44100/6
   a=fmtp:98 baseLayer=128; channelID=5

   The following Offer/Answer example shows an exchange in trying to
   resolve using ATRAC-Advanced-Lossless.  The offer contains three



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 23]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   options: multi-session High-Speed Transfer mode, multiplexed High-
   Speed Transfer mode, and Standard mode.

   Offer:

   m=audio 49170/2 RTP/AVP 97
   a=rtpmap:97 ATRAC-ADVANCED-LOSSLESS/44100/2
   a=fmtp:97 baseLayer=64; blockLength=0; channelID=2
   m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 98
   a=rtpmap:98 ATRAC-ADVANCED-LOSSLESS/44100/2
   a=fmtp:98 baseLayer=256; blockLength=0; channelID=2
   m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 99
   a=rtpmap:99 ATRAC-ADVANCED-LOSSLESS/48000/2
   a=fmtp:99 baseLayer=0; blockLength=1024; channelID=2

   Answer:

   m=audio 49170/2 RTP/AVP 97
   a=rtpmap:97 ATRAC-ADVANCED-LOSSLESS/44100/2
   a=fmtp:97 baseLayer=64; blockLength=0; channelID=2
   m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 98
   a=rtpmap:98 ATRAC-ADVANCED-LOSSLESS/44100/2
   a=fmtp:98 baseLayer=256; blockLength=0; channelID=2
   m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 99

   Note that payload format (encoding) names are commonly shown in upper
   case.  MIME subtypes are commonly shown in lower case.  These names
   are case-insensitive in both places.  Similarly, parameter names are
   case-insensitive both in MIME types and in the default mapping to the
   SDP a=fmtp attribute.

8.  IANA Considerations

   Two new MIME subtypes, for ATRAC3 and ATRAC-X, are requested to be
   registered (see Section 5).

9.  Security Considerations

   Certain security precautions may be desired to protect copyrighted
   material.  The payload format as described in this document is
   subject to the security considerations defined in RFC3550 [1] and any
   applicable profile, for example RFC 3551 [3].  This payload format
   however does not implement any security mechanisms of its own.
   External means, such as SRTP [5], MAY be used since the audio
   compression scheme follows an end-to-end model.

   Since the data transported is audio that is already encoded, the main
   security issues are confidentiality, integrity, and authentication of



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 24]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   the actual audio.

9.1  Confidentiality

   To ensure confidentiality of ATRAC encoded audio, the audio frames
   will have to be encrypted.  Encryption of the payload header,
   however, is not as neccessary, and in fact may not be preferrable if
   the information could be useful to some third party application.

   Because the audio compression scheme follows an end-to-end model,
   encryption may be performed after packet encapsulation.  As multi-
   channel transmissions are contained in single encoded audio frames,
   there is no concern for encryption affecting interleaving data.

9.2  Authentication

   Transmitted data may be tampered or altered due malicious attempts,
   such as man-in-the-middle attacks.  Such attacks may result in
   depacketization and/or decoding errors that could decimate audio
   quality.

   As this payload format does not include its own means for sender
   authentication and integrity protection, an external mechanism must
   be used.  It is RECOMMENDED, however, that the chosen mechanism
   protect more than just the audio data bits.  For example, to protect
   against a man-in-the-middle attack, the payload header and RTP header
   SHOULD be protected.

9.3  Decoding Validation

   Verification of the received encoded audio packets should be
   performed so as to ensure a minimal level of audio quality.  As a
   most primitive implementation, if the receiver calculates a packet
   size differing from the payload length based on data in the payload
   header fields, the receiver SHOULD discard the packet.

10.  References

10.1  Normative References

   [1]  Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobsen,
        "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications",
        RFC 3550, STD 64, July 2003.

   [2]  Handley, M. and V. Jacobson, "SDP: Session Description
        Protocol", RFC 2327, April 1998.

   [3]  Schulzrinne, H., "RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences



Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 25]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


        with Minimal Control", RFC 3551, STD 65, July 2003.

   [4]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
        Levels, BCP 14", RFC 2119, March 1997.

10.2  Informative References

   [5]   Kerr, P., "RTP Payload Format for Vorbis Encoded Audio",
         October 2003.

   [6]   Sjoberg, J., "Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) Payload Format
         and File Storage Format for the Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR) and
         Adpative Multi-Rate Wideband (AMR-WB) Audio Codecs", RFC 3267,
         June 2002.

   [7]   Baugher, M., Carrara, E., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., and Norrman,
         "The Secure Real Time Transport Protocol", July 2003.

   [8]   Rosenberg, J. and Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model with the
         Session Description Protocl (SDP)", RFC 3264, June 2002.

   [9]   Schulzrinne, H., Rao, and Lanphier, "Real Time Streaming
         Protocol (RTSP)", RFC 2326, April 1998.

   [10]  Handley, M., Perkins, and Whelan, "Session Announcement
         Protocol", RFC 2974, October 2000.


Authors' Addresses

   Matthew Romaine
   Sony Corporation, Japan
   6-7-35 Kitashinagawa
   Shinagawa-ku
   Tokyo  141-0001
   Japan

   Email: Matthew.Romaine@jp.sony.com













Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 26]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


   Mitsuyuki Hatanaka
   Sony Corporation, Japan
   6-7-35 Kitashinagawa
   Shinagawa-ku
   Tokyo  141-0001
   Japan

   Email: hatanaka@av.crl.sony.co.jp


   Jun Matsumoto
   Sony Corporation, Japan
   6-7-35 Kitashinagawa
   Shinagawa-ku
   Tokyo  141-0001
   Japan

   Email: jun@av.crl.sony.co.jp

































Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 27]


Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for ATRAC Family         June 2005


Intellectual Property Statement

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.


Disclaimer of Validity

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  This document is subject
   to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
   except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.


Acknowledgment

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.




Romaine, et al.         Expires December 3, 2005               [Page 28]