Network Working Group Z. Zhang
Internet-Draft Juniper Networks, Inc.
Intended status: Standards Track H. Tsunoda
Expires: March 11, 2019 Tohoku Institute of Technology
September 07, 2018
L2L3 VPN Multicast MIB
draft-ietf-bess-l2l3-vpn-mcast-mib-16
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
In particular, it describes two MIB modules which will be used by
other MIB modules for monitoring and/or configuring Layer 2 and Layer
3 Virtual Private Networks that support multicast.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on March 11, 2019.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Summary of MIB Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-TC-MIB Object Definitions . . . . . . 4
4.2. L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-MIB Object Definitions . . . . . . . . 9
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
7. Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1. Introduction
In BGP/MPLS Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), Border Gateway Protocol
(BGP) is used for distributing routes and MultiProtocol Label
Switching (MPLS) is used for forwarding packets across service
provider networks.
The procedures for supporting multicast in BGP/MPLS Layer 3 (L3) VPN
are specified in [RFC6513]. The procedures for supporting multicast
in BGP/MPLS Layer 2 (L2) VPN are specified in [RFC7117]. Throughout
this document, we will use the term "L2L3VpnMCast network" to mean
BGP/MPLS L2 and L3 VPN that support multicast.
L2L3VpnMCast networks use various transport mechanisms for forwarding
a packet to all or a subset of Provider Edge routers (PEs) across
service provider networks. These transport mechanisms are abstracted
as provider tunnels (P-tunnels). The type of a P-tunnel indicates
the type of the tunneling technology used to establish the P-tunnel.
The syntax and semantics of a Tunnel identifier is determined by the
corresponding P-tunnel type [RFC6514]. P-tunnel type and P-tunnel
identifier together identify a P-tunnel.
A BGP attribute that specifies information of a P-tunnel is called
Provider Multicast Service Interface (PMSI) tunnel attribute. The
PMSI tunnel attribute is advertised/received by PEs in BGP auto-
discovery (A-D) routes. [RFC6514] defines the format of a PMSI
tunnel attribute. P-tunnel type and the P-tunnel identifier are
included in the corresponding PMSI tunnel attribute.
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
This document describes textual conventions (TCs) and common managed
objects (MOs) which will be used by other Management Information Base
(MIB) modules for monitoring and/or configuring L2L3VpnMCast
networks.
This document defines two TCs to represent
(a) the type of a P-tunnel and
(b) the identifier of a P-tunnel
respectively.
The document also defines MOs that will provide the information
contained in a PMSI tunnel attribute and corresponding P-tunnel
information.
1.1. Terminology
This document adopts the definitions, acronyms and mechanisms
described in [RFC6513] [RFC6514] [RFC7117] and other documents that
they refer to. Familiarity with Multicast, MPLS, Layer 3 VPN,
Multicast VPN concepts and/or mechanisms is assumed. Some terms
specifically related to this document are explained below.
"Provider Multicast Service Interface (PMSI)" [RFC6513] is a
conceptual interface instantiated by a P-tunnel, a transport
mechanism used to deliver multicast traffic. A PE uses it to send
customer multicast traffic to all or some PEs in the same VPN.
There are two kinds of PMSIs: "Inclusive PMSI (I-PMSI)" and
"Selective PMSI (S-PMSI)" [RFC6513]. An I-PMSI is a PMSI that
enables a PE attached to a particular Multicast VPN to transmit a
message to all PEs in the same VPN. An S-PMSI is a PMSI that enables
a PE attached to a particular Multicast VPN to transmit a message to
some of the PEs in the same VPN.
Throughout this document, we will use the term "PMSI" to refer both
"I-PMSI" and "S-PMSI."
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework
For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of
RFC 3410 [RFC3410].
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally
accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the
Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB
module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58,
RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580
[RFC2580].
3. Summary of MIB Modules
This document defines two MIB modules: L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-TC-MIB and
L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-MIB.
o L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-TC-MIB contains two Textual Conventions:
L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelType and L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId.
L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelType provides an enumeration of the
P-tunnel types. L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId represents an
identifier of a P-tunnel.
o L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-MIB defines a table
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeTable. An entry in this table
corresponds to the attribute information of a specific P-tunnel on
a PE router. Entries in this table will be used by other MIB
modules for monitoring and/or configuring L2L3VpnMCast network.
The table index uniquely identifies a P-tunnel. It is composed of
a type and identifier of a P-tunnel. The table may also be used
in conjunction with other MIBs, such as MPLS Traffic Engineering
MIB (MPLS-TE-STD-MIB) [RFC3812], to obtain further information
about a P-tunnel. It may also be used in conjunction with the
Interfaces Group MIB (IF-MIB) [RFC2863] to obtain further
information about the interface corresponding to a P-tunnel.
4. Definitions
4.1. L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-TC-MIB Object Definitions
L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-TC-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, mib-2
FROM SNMPv2-SMI -- [RFC2578]
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
FROM SNMPv2-TC; -- [RFC2579]
l2L3VpnMcastTCMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "201809071200Z" -- 7th September, 2018
ORGANIZATION "IETF BESS Working Group."
CONTACT-INFO
" Zhaohui Zhang
Juniper Networks, Inc.
10 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA 01886
USA
Email: zzhang@juniper.net
Hiroshi Tsunoda
Tohoku Institute of Technology
35-1, Yagiyama Kasumi-cho
Taihaku-ku, Sendai, 982-8577
Japan
Email: tsuno@m.ieice.org
Comments and discussion to bess@ietf.org
"
DESCRIPTION
"This MIB module specifies textual conventions for
Border Gateway Protocol/MultiProtocol Label
Switching Layer 2 and Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks
that support multicast (L2L3VpnMCast networks).
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2018).
"
-- Revision history.
REVISION "201809071200Z" -- 7th September, 2018
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version, published as RFC XXXX."
-- RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this note
::= { mib-2 AAAA }
-- IANA Reg.: Please assign a value for "AAAA" under the
-- 'mib-2' subtree and record the assignment in the SMI
-- Numbers registry.
-- RFC Ed.: When the above assignment has been made, please
-- remove the above note
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
-- replace "AAAA" here with the assigned value and
-- remove this note.
-- Textual convention
L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This textual convention enumerates values
representing the type of a provider tunnel (P-tunnel)
used for L2L3VpnMCast networks.
These labeled numbers are aligned with the definition
of Tunnel types in Section 5 of [RFC6514] and
Section 14.1 of [RFC7524].
The enumerated values and the corresponding P-tunnel types
are as follows:
noTunnelInfo (0) : no tunnel information present
[RFC6514]
rsvpP2mp (1) : RSVP-TE P2MP LSP [RFC4875]
ldpP2mp (2) : mLDP P2MP LSP [RFC6388]
pimSsm (3) : PIM-SSM Tree [RFC7761]
pimAsm (4) : PIM-SM Tree [RFC7761]
pimBidir (5) : BIDIR-PIM Tree [RFC5015]
ingressReplication (6) : Ingress Replication [RFC6513]
ldpMp2mp (7) : mLDP MP2MP LSP [RFC6388]
transportTunnel (8) : Transport Tunnel [RFC7524]
These numbers are registered at IANA.
A current list of assignments can be found at
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters/
bgp-parameters.xhtml#pmsi-tunnel-types>.
"
REFERENCE
"RFC4875
RFC5015
RFC6388
RFC6513
RFC6514, Section 5
RFC7524, Section 14.1
RFC7761
"
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
SYNTAX INTEGER
{
noTunnelInfo (0),
rsvpP2mp (1),
ldpP2mp (2),
pimSsm (3),
pimAsm (4),
pimBidir (5),
ingressReplication (6),
ldpMp2mp (7),
transportTunnel (8)
}
L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This textual convention represents the tunnel identifier
of a P-tunnel.
The size of the identifier depends on the address family
(IPv4 or IPv6) and the value of the corresponding
L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelType object.
The corresponding L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelType object
represents the type of the tunneling technology used
to establish the P-tunnel.
The size of the identifier for each tunneling technology
is summarized below.
L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelType Size (in octets)
(tunneling technology) IPv4 IPv6
-----------------------------------------------------------
noTunnelInfo (No tunnel information) 0 0
rsvpP2mp (RSVP-TE P2MP LSP) 12 24
ldpP2mp (mLDP P2MP LSP) 17 29
pimSsm (PIM-SSM Tree) 8 32
pimAsm (PIM-SM Tree) 8 32
pimBidir (BIDIR-PIM Tree) 8 32
ingressReplication (Ingress Replication) 4 16
ldpMp2mp (mLDP MP2MP LSP) 17 29
transportTunnel (Transport Tunnel) 8 32
Tunnel type is set to 'No tunnel information present'
when the PMSI Tunnel attribute carries no tunnel
information (there is no Tunnel Identifier).
The value of the corresponding L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId
object will be a string of length zero.
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
For tunnel type rsvpP2mp(1), the corresponding Tunnel
Identifier is composed of Extended Tunnel ID (4 octets in IPv4,
16 octets in IPv6), Reserved (2 octets), Tunnel ID (2 octets),
and P2MP ID (4 octets).
The size of the corresponding L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId
object will be 12 octets in IPv4 and 24 octets in IPv6.
For tunnel type ldpP2mp(2), the corresponding Tunnel Identifier
is the P2MP Forwarding Equivalence Class (FEC) Element
[RFC6388]. The size of the corresponding
L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId object will be 17 octets
in IPv4 and 29 octets in IPv6.
For tunnel type pimSsm(3), PimAsm(4), and PimBidir(5), the
corresponding Tunnel Identifier is composed of the source IP
address and the group IP address.
The size of the corresponding L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId
object will be 8 octets in IPv4 and 32 octets in IPv6.
For tunnel type ingressReplication(6), the Tunnel Identifier is
the unicast tunnel endpoint IP address of the local PE.
The size of the corresponding L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId
object will be 4 octets in IPv4 and 16 octets in IPv6.
For tunnel type ldpMp2mp(7), the Tunnel Identifier is
MP2MP FEC Element [RFC6388].
The size of the corresponding L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId
object will be 17 octets in IPv4 and 29 octets in IPv6.
For tunnel type transportTunnel(8), the Tunnel Identifier
is a tuple of Source PE Address and Local Number,
which is a number that is unique to the Source PE [RFC7524].
Both Source PE Address and Local Number are 4 octets in IPv4
and 16 octets in IPv6.
The size of the corresponding L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId
object will be 8 octets in IPv4 and 32 octets in IPv6.
"
REFERENCE
"RFC6514, Section 5
RFC4875, Section 19.1
RFC6388, Section 2.2 and 3.2
RFC7524, Section 14.1
"
SYNTAX OCTET STRING ( SIZE (0|4|8|12|16|17|24|29|32) )
END
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
4.2. L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-MIB Object Definitions
L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, mib-2, zeroDotZero
FROM SNMPv2-SMI -- [RFC2578]
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF -- [RFC2580]
RowPointer
FROM SNMPv2-TC -- [RFC2579]
MplsLabel
FROM MPLS-TC-STD-MIB -- [RFC3811]
L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelType,
L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId
FROM L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-TC-MIB; -- [RFCXXXX]
-- RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this note
l2L3VpnMcastMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "201809071200Z" -- 7th September, 2018
ORGANIZATION "IETF BESS Working Group."
CONTACT-INFO
" Zhaohui Zhang
Juniper Networks, Inc.
10 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA 01886
USA
Email: zzhang@juniper.net
Hiroshi Tsunoda
Tohoku Institute of Technology
35-1, Yagiyama Kasumi-cho
Taihaku-ku, Sendai, 982-8577
Japan
Email: tsuno@m.ieice.org
Comments and discussion to bess@ietf.org
"
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
DESCRIPTION
"This MIB module defines a table representing the attribute
information of the provider tunnels (P-tunnels) on a PE router.
This MIB module will be used by other MIB modules designed for
monitoring and/or configuring Border Gateway
Protocol/MultiProtocol Label Switching
Layer 2 and Layer 3 Virtual Private
Network that support multicast (L2L3VpnMCast network).
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2018).
"
-- Revision history.
REVISION "201809071200Z" -- 7th September, 2018
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version, published as RFC XXXX."
-- RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this note
::= { mib-2 BBBB }
-- IANA Reg.: Please assign a value for "BBBB" under the
-- 'mib-2' subtree and record the assignment in the SMI
-- Numbers registry.
-- RFC Ed.: When the above assignment has been made, please
-- remove the above note
-- replace "BBBB" here with the assigned value and
-- remove this note.
-- Top level components of this MIB.
l2L3VpnMcastStates OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::= { l2L3VpnMcastMIB 1 }
l2L3VpnMcastConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::= { l2L3VpnMcastMIB 2 }
-- tables, scalars, conformance information
-- Table of PMSI Tunnel Attributes
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF L2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table corresponds to
the attribute information of a specific
P-tunnel on a PE router.
A part of attributes correspond to fields in
a Provider Multicast Service Interface (PMSI) Tunnel
attribute advertised and received by a PE router.
The entries will be referred to by other MIB modules
for monitoring and/or configuring L2L3VpnMCast networks.
"
REFERENCE
"RFC6514, Section 5"
::= { l2L3VpnMcastStates 1 }
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX L2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A conceptual row corresponding to a specific
P-tunnel on this router.
"
REFERENCE
"RFC6514, Section 5"
INDEX {
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeType,
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeId
}
::= { l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeTable 1 }
L2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeType
L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelType,
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeId
L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId,
l2L3VpnMCastPmsiTunnelLeafInfoRequired
INTEGER,
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeMplsLabel
MplsLabel,
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelPointer
RowPointer,
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelIf
RowPointer
}
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelType
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object indicates the type of the tunneling technology
used to establish the P-tunnel corresponding to this entry.
When BGP-based PMSI signaling is used, the value of
this object corresponds to the Tunnel Type field
in the PMSI Tunnel attribute advertised/received
in a PMSI auto-discovery (A-D) route.
"
REFERENCE
"RFC6514, Section 5"
::= { l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeEntry 1 }
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeId OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX L2L3VpnMcastProviderTunnelId
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object represents the Tunnel Identifier field, which
uniquely identifies a P-tunnel, in the PMSI Tunnel attribute
of the P-tunnel corresponding to this entry.
The size of the identifier depends on the address family
(IPv4 or IPv6) and the value of the corresponding
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeType object i.e., the type of
the tunneling technology used to establish the P-tunnel.
"
REFERENCE
"RFC6514, Section 5"
::= { l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeEntry 2 }
l2L3VpnMCastPmsiTunnelLeafInfoRequired OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
false (0),
true (1),
notAvailable (2)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"When the value of this object is set to 1 (true),
it indicates that the PE which originated the
PMSI Tunnel attribute of the P-tunnel corresponding
to this entry requests receivers to originate
a new Leaf A-D (Auto-Discovery) route.
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
A value of 0 (false) indicates that there is no such
request.
When the P-tunnel does not have a corresponding PMSI
tunnel attribute, the value of this object will be
2 (notAvailable).
In the case of Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs,
this object represents the 'Leaf Information Required flag'
[RFC6514] in the Flags field in the PMSI Tunnel attribute
of the P-tunnel corresponding to this entry.
"
REFERENCE
"RFC6514, Section 5
"
::= { l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeEntry 3 }
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeMplsLabel OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX MplsLabel
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object represents the MPLS Label in the PMSI Tunnel
attribute of the P-tunnel corresponding to this entry.
When BGP-based PMSI signaling is used, the PMSI Tunnel
attribute of the P-tunnel will be advertised/received
in a PMSI auto-discovery (A-D) route. The value of
this object corresponds to the MPLS Label in the attribute.
When the P-tunnel does not have a PMSI tunnel
attribute, the value of this object will be 0.
"
REFERENCE
"RFC6514, Section 5"
::= { l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeEntry 4 }
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelPointer OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Details of a P-tunnel identified by
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeId may be present
in some other table, e.g.,
mplsTunnelTable [RFC3812]. This object specifies
the pointer to the row that pertains to the entry
in the table.
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
If no such entry exists, the value of this object
will be zeroDotZero.
"
REFERENCE
"RFC3812, Section 6.1 and Section 11"
DEFVAL { zeroDotZero }
::= { l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeEntry 5 }
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelIf OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If the P-tunnel identified by
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeId has a corresponding
entry in ifXTable [RFC2863], this object will
point to the row in ifXTable that pertains to the entry.
Otherwise, the value of this object will be zeroDotZero.
"
REFERENCE
"RFC2863, Section 6"
DEFVAL { zeroDotZero }
::= { l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeEntry 6 }
-- Conformance Information
l2L3VpnMcastCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::= { l2L3VpnMcastConformance 1 }
l2L3VpnMcastGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::= { l2L3VpnMcastConformance 2 }
-- Compliance Statements
l2L3VpnMcastCoreCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The core compliance statement for SNMP entities
which implement the L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-MIB Module."
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS {
l2L3VpnMcastCoreGroup
}
::= { l2L3VpnMcastCompliances 1 }
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
l2L3VpnMcastFullCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The full compliance statement for SNMP entities
which implement the L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-MIB Module."
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS {
l2L3VpnMcastCoreGroup,
l2L3VpnMcastOptionalGroup
}
::= { l2L3VpnMcastCompliances 2 }
-- units of conformance
l2L3VpnMcastCoreGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
l2L3VpnMCastPmsiTunnelLeafInfoRequired,
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeMplsLabel
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Support of these objects is required."
::= { l2L3VpnMcastGroups 1 }
l2L3VpnMcastOptionalGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelPointer,
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelIf
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Support of these objects is optional."
::= { l2L3VpnMcastGroups 2 }
END
5. Security Considerations
There are no management objects defined in these MIB modules that
have a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. So, if
this MIB module is implemented correctly, then there is no risk that
an intruder can alter or create any management objects of this MIB
module via direct SNMP SET operations.
Some of the readable objects in these MIB modules (i.e., objects with
a MAX-ACCESS other than not-accessible) may be considered sensitive
or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
control even GET and/or NOTIFY access to these objects and possibly
to even encrypt the values of these objects when sending them over
the network via SNMP. These are the tables and objects and their
sensitivity/vulnerability:
o the l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeTable collectively shows the
P-tunnel network topology and its performance characteristics.
For instance, l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelAttributeId in this table will
contain the identifier that uniquely identifies a P-tunnel. This
identifier may be composed of source and multicast group IP
addresses. l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelPointer and
l2L3VpnMcastPmsiTunnelIf will point to the corresponding entries
in other tables containing configuration and/or performance
information of a P-tunnel and its interface. If an Administrator
does not want to reveal this information, then these objects
should be considered sensitive/vulnerable.
SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security.
Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPsec),
there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to
access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this
MIB module.
Implementations SHOULD provide the security features described by the
SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410]), and implementations claiming
compliance to the SNMPv3 standard MUST include full support for
authentication and privacy via the User-based Security Model (USM)
[RFC3414] with the AES cipher algorithm [RFC3826]. Implementations
MAY also provide support for the Transport Security Model (TSM)
[RFC5591] in combination with a secure transport such as SSH
[RFC5592] or TLS/DTLS [RFC6353].
Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT
RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to
enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator
responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an
instance of this MIB module is properly configured to give access to
the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate
rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.
6. IANA Considerations
The MIB module in this document uses the following IANA-assigned
OBJECT IDENTIFIER values recorded in the SMI Numbers registry:
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
Name Description OBJECT IDENTIFIER value
----------------- -------------------------- ----------------------
l2L3VpnMcastTCMIB L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-TC-MIB { mib-2 AAAA }
l2L3VpnMcastMIB L2L3-VPN-MULTICAST-MIB { mib-2 BBBB }
Editor's Note (to be removed prior to publication): the IANA is
requested to assign a value for "AAAA" and "BBBB" under the 'mib-2'
subtree and to record the assignment in the SMI Numbers registry.
When the assignment has been made, the RFC Editor is asked to replace
"AAAA" and "BBBB" (here and in the MIB module) with the assigned
value and to remove this note.
7. Acknowledgement
Glenn Mansfield Keeni did the MIB Doctor review and provided valuable
comments.
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/
RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/
rfc2119>.
[RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Structure of Management Information
Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, DOI 10.17487/
RFC2578, April 1999, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/
rfc2578>.
[RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD
58, RFC 2579, DOI 10.17487/RFC2579, April 1999,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2579>.
[RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Conformance Statements for SMIv2",
STD 58, RFC 2580, DOI 10.17487/RFC2580, April 1999,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2580>.
[RFC2863] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group
MIB", RFC 2863, DOI 10.17487/RFC2863, June 2000,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2863>.
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
[RFC3414] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model
(USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMPv3)", STD 62, RFC 3414, DOI 10.17487/
RFC3414, December 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/
rfc3414>.
[RFC3811] Nadeau, T., Ed. and J. Cucchiara, Ed., "Definitions of
Textual Conventions (TCs) for Multiprotocol Label
Switching (MPLS) Management", RFC 3811, DOI 10.17487/
RFC3811, June 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/
rfc3811>.
[RFC3812] Srinivasan, C., Viswanathan, A., and T. Nadeau,
"Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering
(TE) Management Information Base (MIB)", RFC 3812, DOI
10.17487/RFC3812, June 2004, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc3812>.
[RFC3826] Blumenthal, U., Maino, F., and K. McCloghrie, "The
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Cipher Algorithm in the
SNMP User-based Security Model", RFC 3826, DOI 10.17487/
RFC3826, June 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/
rfc3826>.
[RFC4875] Aggarwal, R., Ed., Papadimitriou, D., Ed., and S.
Yasukawa, Ed., "Extensions to Resource Reservation
Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for Point-to-
Multipoint TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs)", RFC 4875, DOI
10.17487/RFC4875, May 2007, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc4875>.
[RFC5015] Handley, M., Kouvelas, I., Speakman, T., and L. Vicisano,
"Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast (BIDIR-
PIM)", RFC 5015, DOI 10.17487/RFC5015, October 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5015>.
[RFC5591] Harrington, D. and W. Hardaker, "Transport Security Model
for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD
78, RFC 5591, DOI 10.17487/RFC5591, June 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5591>.
[RFC5592] Harrington, D., Salowey, J., and W. Hardaker, "Secure
Shell Transport Model for the Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 5592, DOI 10.17487/RFC5592, June
2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5592>.
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
[RFC6353] Hardaker, W., "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport
Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",
STD 78, RFC 6353, DOI 10.17487/RFC6353, July 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6353>.
[RFC6388] Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Minei, I., Ed., Kompella, K., and B.
Thomas, "Label Distribution Protocol Extensions for Point-
to-Multipoint and Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched
Paths", RFC 6388, DOI 10.17487/RFC6388, November 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6388>.
[RFC6513] Rosen, E., Ed. and R. Aggarwal, Ed., "Multicast in MPLS/
BGP IP VPNs", RFC 6513, DOI 10.17487/RFC6513, February
2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6513>.
[RFC6514] Aggarwal, R., Rosen, E., Morin, T., and Y. Rekhter, "BGP
Encodings and Procedures for Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP
VPNs", RFC 6514, DOI 10.17487/RFC6514, February 2012,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6514>.
[RFC7117] Aggarwal, R., Ed., Kamite, Y., Fang, L., Rekhter, Y., and
C. Kodeboniya, "Multicast in Virtual Private LAN Service
(VPLS)", RFC 7117, DOI 10.17487/RFC7117, February 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7117>.
[RFC7524] Rekhter, Y., Rosen, E., Aggarwal, R., Morin, T.,
Grosclaude, I., Leymann, N., and S. Saad, "Inter-Area
Point-to-Multipoint (P2MP) Segmented Label Switched Paths
(LSPs)", RFC 7524, DOI 10.17487/RFC7524, May 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7524>.
[RFC7761] Fenner, B., Handley, M., Holbrook, H., Kouvelas, I.,
Parekh, R., Zhang, Z., and L. Zheng, "Protocol Independent
Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification
(Revised)", STD 83, RFC 7761, DOI 10.17487/RFC7761, March
2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7761>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
8.2. Informative References
[RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart,
"Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-
Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, DOI 10.17487/
RFC3410, December 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/
rfc3410>.
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft L2L3-VPN-MCAST MIB September 2018
Authors' Addresses
Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang
Juniper Networks, Inc.
10 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA 01886
USA
Email: zzhang@juniper.net
Hiroshi Tsunoda
Tohoku Institute of Technology
35-1, Yagiyama Kasumi-cho
Taihaku-ku, Sendai 982-8577
Japan
Phone: +81-22-305-3411
Email: tsuno@m.ieice.org
Zhang & Tsunoda Expires March 11, 2019 [Page 20]