Network Working Group Thomas D. Nadeau
Internet Draft Cisco Systems, Inc.
Expires: August 2004
Cheenu Srinivasan
Bloomberg L.P.
Adrian Farrel
Old Dog Consulting
Tim Hall
Ed Harrison
Data Connection Ltd.
February 2004
Definitions of Textual Conventions for Generalized Multiprotocol
Label Switching (GMPLS) Management
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-04.txt
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
Abstract
This document defines a Management Information Base (MIB) module
which contains Textual Conventions to represent commonly used
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) management
information. The intent is that these TEXTUAL CONVENTIONS (TCs) will
be imported and used in GMPLS related MIB modules that would
otherwise define their own representations.
Nadeau, Srinivasan, Farrel, Hall and Harrison [Page 1]
Internet Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-04.txt February 2004
Table of Contents
1. Introduction 2
2. The SNMP Management Framework 2
3. GMPLS Textual Conventions MIB Definitions 3
4. Security Considerations 5
5. IANA Considerations 5
6. References 5
6.1. Normative References 5
6.2. Informational References 6
7. Authors' Addresses 7
8. Full Copyright Statement 7
9. Intellectual Property Notice 8
1. Introduction
This document defines a MIB module which contains Textual Conventions
for Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) networks.
These Textual Conventions should be imported by MIB modules which
manage GMPLS networks.
This MIB module supplements the MIB module in [TCMIB] that defines
Textual Conventions for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)
Management. [TCMIB] may continue to be used without this MIB module
in networks that support only MPLS.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Comments should be made directly to the CCAMP mailing list at
ccamp@ops.ietf.org.
For an introduction to the concepts of GMPLS, see [GMPLSArch].
2. The SNMP Management Framework
For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of
RFC 3410 [RFC3410].
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally
accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the
Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB
module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58,
RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580
[RFC2580].
Nadeau, Srinivasan, Farrel, Hall and Harrison [Page 2]
Internet Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-04.txt February 2004
3. GMPLS Textual Conventions MIB Definitions
GMPLS-TC-STD-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY
FROM SNMPv2-SMI
transmission
FROM SNMPv2-SMI
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
FROM SNMPv2-TC
;
gmplsTCStdMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED
"200402130900Z" -- 13 February 2004 9:00:00 GMT"
ORGANIZATION "Common Control And Management Protocols (CCAMP)
Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO
" Thomas D. Nadeau
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Email: tnadeau@cisco.com
Cheenu Srinivasan
Bloomberg L.P.
Email: cheenu@bloomberg.net
Adrian Farrel
Old Dog Consulting
Email: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Ed Harrison
Data Connection Ltd.
Email: ed.harrison@dataconnection.com
Tim Hall
Data Connection Ltd.
Email: tim.hall@dataconnection.com
Comments about this document should be emailed direct to the
CCAMP working group mailing list at ccamp@ops.ietf.org"
DESCRIPTION
"Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This version of this
MIB module is part of RFCXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal
notices.
This MIB module defines Textual Conventions for concepts used in
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) networks."
-- Revision history.
REVISION
"200402130900Z" -- 13 February 2004 9:00:00 GMT"
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version published as part of RFC XXXX."
-- Please see the IANA Considerations Section.
-- The requested gmplsStdMIB subId is xx, i.e.
::= { gmplsStdMIB xx }
Nadeau, Srinivasan, Farrel, Hall and Harrison [Page 3]
Internet Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-04.txt February 2004
gmplsStdMIB OBJECT IDENTIFIER
-- This object identifier needs to be assigned by IANA.
-- Since mpls has been assigned an ifType of 166 we recommend
-- that this OID be 166 as well, i.e.
::= { transmission XXX }
-- Textual Conventions (sorted alphabetically).
GmplsFreeformLabel ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This value represents a freeform generalized MPLS Label. This
can be used to represent label types which are not standard
in the drafts. It may also be used by systems that do not
wish to represent the labels using the specific label types."
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..64))
GmplsGeneralizedLabelTypes ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Determines the interpretation that should be applied to a
label."
SYNTAX INTEGER {
gmplsMplsLabel(1),
gmplsPortWavelengthLabel(2),
gmplsFreeformGeneralizedLabel(3),
gmplsSonetLabel(4),
gmplsSdhLabel(5),
gmplsWavebandLabel(6)
}
GmplsSegmentDirection ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The direction of data flow on an LSP segment with respect to the
head of the LSP.
Where an LSP is signaled using a conventional signaling
protocol, the 'head' of the LSP is the source of the signaling
(also known as the ingress) and the 'tail' is the destination
(also known as the egress). For unidirectional LSPs, this
usually matches the direction of flow of data.
For manually configured unidirectional LSPs the direction of the
LSP segment matches the direction of flow of data. For manually
configured bidirecitonal LSPs, an arbitrary decision must be
made about which LER is the 'head'."
SYNTAX INTEGER {
forward(1),
reverse(2)
}
END
Nadeau, Srinivasan, Farrel, Hall and Harrison [Page 4]
Internet Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-04.txt February 2004
4. Security Considerations
This module does not define any management objects. Instead, it
defines a set of textual conventions which may be used by other GMPLS
MIB modules to define management objects.
Meaningful security considerations can only be written in the MIB
modules that define management objects. Therefore, this document has
no impact on the security of the Internet.
5. IANA Considerations
IANA is requested to make a MIB OID assignment under the transmission
branch, that is, assign the gmplsStdMIB under { transmission 166 }.
This sub-id is requested because 166 is the ifType for mpls(166) and
is available under transmission.
In the future, GMPLS related standards track MIB modules should be
rooted under the mplsStdMIB (sic) subtree. IANA is requested to
manage that namespace. New assignments can only be made via a
Standards Action as specified in [RFC2434].
This document also requests IANA to assign { gmplsStdMIB xx } to the
GMPLS-TC-STD-MIB specified in this document. The value 1 is
suggested.
6. References
6.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J.,
Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of
Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58,
RFC 2578, April 1999.
[RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J.,
Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual
Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April
1999.
[RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J.,
Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance
Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.
[RFC3471] Berger, L. (Editor), "Generalized Multi-Protocol
Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Functional
Description", RFC 3471, January 2003.
Nadeau, Srinivasan, Farrel, Hall and Harrison [Page 5]
Internet Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-04.txt February 2004
6.2. Informational References
[RFC2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs",
BCP: 26, RFC 2434, October 1998.
[RFC3031] Rosen, E., Viswananthan, A., and R. Callon,
Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture",
RFC 3031, January 2001.
[RFC3209] Awduche, D., Berger, L., Gan, D., Li, T.,
Srinivasan, V., Swallow, G., "RSVP-TE: Extensions to
RSVP for LSP Tunnels", RFC 3209, December 2001.
[RFC3212] Jamoussi, B., (editor), et. al. "Constraint-Based
LSP Setup using LDP", RFC 3212, January 2002.
[RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart,
"Introduction and Applicability Statements for
Internet-Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410,
December 2002.
[RFC3472] Ashwood-Smith, P., Berger, L. (Editors),
"Generalized MPLS Signaling - CR-LDP Extensions",
RFC 3472, January 2003.
[RFC3473] Berger, L. (Editor), "Generalized MPLS Signaling -
RSVP-TE Extensions", RFC 3473 January 2003.
[GMPLSSonetSDH] Mannie, E., Papadimitriou, D. (Editors),
"Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
Extensions for SONET and SDH Control", Internet
Draft <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-08.txt>,
February 2003, work in progress.
[GMPLSLSRMIB] Nadeau, T., Srinivasan, C., Farrel, A., Hall, T.,
and Harrison, E., "Generalized Multiprotocol Label
Switching (GMPLS) Label Switching Router (LSR)
Management Information Base", draft-ietf-ccamp-
gmpls-lsr-mib-04.txt, February 2004, work in
progress.
[GMPLSTEMIB] Nadeau, T., Srinivasan, C., Farrel, A., Hall, T.,
and Harrison, E., "Generalized Multiprotocol Label
Switching (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering Management
Information Base", draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-
04.txt, February 2004, work in progress.
[TCMIB] Nadeau, T., Cucchiara, J. (Editors) "Definitions
of Textual Conventions for Multiprotocol Label
Switching (MPLS) Management", Internet Draft
<draft-ietf-mpls-tc-mib-14.txt>, November 2003,
work in progress.
Nadeau, Srinivasan, Farrel, Hall and Harrison [Page 6]
Internet Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-04.txt February 2004
[GMPLSArch] Mannie, E. (Editor), "Generalized Multiprotocol
Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture", Internet
Draft <draft-many-gmpls-architecture-07.txt>, May
2003, work in progress.
7. Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Joan Cucchiara for her help with compilation
issues.
8. Authors' Addresses
Thomas D. Nadeau
Cisco Systems, Inc.
300 Apollo Drive
Chelmsford, MA 01824
Phone: +1-978-244-3051
Email: tnadeau@cisco.com
Cheenu Srinivasan
Bloomberg L.P.
499 Park Ave.,
New York, NY 10022
Phone: +1-212-893-3682
Email: cheenu@bloomberg.net
Adrian Farrel
Old Dog Consulting
Phone: +44 1978 860944
Email: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Tim Hall
Data Connection Ltd.
100 Church Street
Enfield, Middlesex
EN2 6BQ, UK
Phone: +44 20 8366 1177
Email: tim.hall@dataconnection.com
Ed Harrison
Data Connection Ltd.
100 Church Street
Enfield, Middlesex
EN2 6BQ, UK
Phone: +44 20 8366 1177
Email: ed.harrison@dataconnection.com
9. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished
to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain
it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
Nadeau, Srinivasan, Farrel, Hall and Harrison [Page 7]
Internet Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-04.txt February 2004
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This
document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS
IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK
FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL
NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY
OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
10. Intellectual Property Notice
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11 [RFC2028].
Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to practice
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
Director.
Nadeau, Srinivasan, Farrel, Hall and Harrison [Page 8]
