Diameter Maintenance and J. Korhonen
Extensions (DIME) TeliaSonera
Internet-Draft H. Tschofenig
Intended status: Standards Track Nokia Siemens Networks
Expires: August 28, 2008 J. Bournelle
Orange Labs
G. Giaretta
Qualcomm
M. Nakhjiri
Motorola
February 25, 2008
Diameter Mobile IPv6: Support for Home Agent to Diameter Server
Interaction
draft-ietf-dime-mip6-split-07.txt
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 28, 2008.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
Abstract
Mobile IPv6 deployments may want to bootstrap their operations
dynamically based on an interaction between the Home Agent and the
Diameter server of the Mobile Service Provider (MSP). This document
specifies the interaction between a Mobile IP Home Agent and that
Diameter server.
Several different mechanisms for authenticating a Mobile Node are
supported. The usage of the Internet Key Exchange v2 (IKEv2)
protocol allows different mechanisms, such as the Extensible
Authentication Protocol (EAP), certificates and pre-shared secrets to
be used. Furthermore, another method makes use of the Mobile IPv6
Authentication protocol. In addition to authentication and
authorization, the configuration of Mobile IPv6 specific parameters
and accounting is specified in this document.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3. Advertising Application Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. Protocol Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.1. Support for Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and EAP . . . . . . . . 7
4.2. Support for Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and Certificates . . . 9
4.3. Support for Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and Pre-Shared
Secrets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.4. Support for the Mobile IPv6 Authentication Protocol . . . 10
4.5. Mobile IPv6 Session Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.5.1. Session-Termination-Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.5.2. Session-Termination-Answer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.5.3. Abort-Session-Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.5.4. Abort-Session-Answer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.6. Accounting for Mobile IPv6 services . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.6.1. Accounting-Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.6.2. Accounting-Answer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5. Command Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.1. Command Code for Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and EAP . . . . . 13
5.1.1. Diameter-EAP-Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.1.2. Diameter-EAP-Answer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5.2. Command Code for Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and
Certificate- and PSK-based Authentication . . . . . . . . 15
5.2.1. AA-Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.2.2. AA-Answer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.3. Command Codes for MIPv6 Authentication Protocol Support . 17
5.3.1. MIP6-Request-Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.3.2. MIP6-Answer-Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6. AVPs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
6.1. User-Name AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6.2. Called-Station-Id AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6.3. MIP-MN-AAA-SPI AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6.4. MIP-MN-HA-SPI AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6.5. MIP-Mobile-Node-Address AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6.6. MIP-Home-Agent-Address AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
6.7. MIP-Careof-Address AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
6.8. MIP-Authenticator AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
6.9. MIP-MAC-Mobility-Data AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
6.10. MIP-Session-Key AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
6.11. MIP-MSA-Lifetime AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
6.12. MIP-MN-HA-MSA AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
6.13. MIP-Algorithm-Type AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
6.14. MIP-Replay-Mode AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
6.15. MIP6-Feature-Vector AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
6.16. MIP-Timestamp AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
6.17. QoS-Capability AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
6.18. QoS-Resources AVP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
6.19. Coupled Accounting Model Accounting AVPs . . . . . . . . . 25
7. Result-Code AVP Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
7.1. Permanent Failures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
8. AVP Occurrence Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
8.1. AAR, AAA, DER, DEA, MRM and MAM AVP/Command-Code Table . . 27
8.2. Coupled Accounting Model AVP Table . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
9.1. Command Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
9.2. AVP Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
9.3. Result-Code AVP Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
9.4. Application Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
9.5. Namespaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
9.6. Mobile IPv6 Status Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
11. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 33
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
1. Introduction
Performing the Mobile IPv6 protocol [1], requires the Mobile Node
(MN) to own a Home Address (HoA) and to have an assigned Home Agent
(HA) to the MN. The MN needs to register with the HA in order enable
its reachability and mobility, when away from home. The registration
process itself requires establishment of IPSec security associations
(SA) and cryptographic material between the MN and HA. Providing the
collection of home address, HA address and keying material is
generally referred to as the Mobile IPv6 bootstrapping problem [13].
The purpose of this specification is to provide Diameter support for
the interaction between the HA and the AAA server required to solve
the bootstrapping problem in the split scenario [2] in a manner that
satisfies the requirements defined in [14].
From a mobility service provider (MSP) perspective, it is important
to verify that the MN is authenticated and authorized to utilize
Mobile IPv6 service and that such services are accounted for. Only
when the MN is authenticated and authorized, the MSP allows the
bootstrapping of Mobile IPv6 parameters. Thus, prior to processing
the Mobile IPv6 registrations, the HA, participates in the
authentication of the MN to verify the MN's identity. The HA also
participates in the Mobile IPv6 authorization process involving the
Diameter infrastructure. The HA, due to its role in traffic
forwarding, may also perform accounting for the Mobile IPv6 service
provided to the MN.
This document enables the following functionality:
Authentication: Asserting or helping with assertion of the
correctness of the MN identity. As a Diameter client supporting
the new Diameter Mobile IPv6 application, the HA may need to
support more than one authentication type depending on the
environment. Although the authentication is performed by the AAA
server there is an impact for the HA as different set of command
codes are needed for the respective authentication procedures.
Authorization: The HA must verify that the user is authorized to use
the Mobile IPv6 service using the assistance of the MSP Diameter
servers. This is accomplished through the use of new Diameter
commands specifically designed for performing Mobile IPv6
authorization decisions. This document defines these commands and
requires the HA to support them and to participate in this
authorization signaling.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
Accounting: For accounting purposes and capacity planning, it is
required of the HA to provide accounting report to the Diameter
infrastructure and thus to support the related Diameter accounting
procedures.
Figure 1 depicts the reference architecture for this document.
+--------+
|Diameter|
|Server |
+--------+
^
Back-End | Diameter MIPv6
Protocol | HA<->AAA Server
Support | Interaction
| (this document)
v
+---------+ +---------------+
| Mobile | Front-End Protocol |Home Agent / |
| Node |<--------------------------|Diameter Client|
+---------+ IKEv2 or RFC 4285 +---------------+
Figure 1: Architecture Overview
Mobile IPv6 signaling between the MN and the HA can protected using
two different mechanisms, namely using IPSec and via the MIPv6
Authentication Protocol [3]. The important aspect is, however, that
for these two approaches several different authentication and key
exchange solutions are available. To establish IPSec security
associations, protecting of Mobile IPv6 signaling messages IKEv2 is
used [4]. IKEv2 supports EAP-based authentication, certificates and
pre-shared secrets. For protecting using the MIPv6 Authentication
Protocol [3] a mechanism has been designed that is very similar to
the one used by Mobile IPv4.
The ability to use different credentials has an impact on the
interaction between the HA (acting as a Diameter client) and the
Diameter Server. For that reason this document illustrates the usage
of these authentication mechanisms with different subsections for:
o IKEv2 usage with EAP
o IKEv2 usage with certificates and pre-shared secrets
o MIPv6 Authentication Protocol
For accounting of Mobile IPv6 services provided to the MN, this
specification uses the accounting application defined in [5].
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [6].
The MIPv6 bootstrapping terminology is taken from [13].
3. Advertising Application Support
Diameter nodes conforming to this specification MUST advertise
support by including the Diameter Mobile IPv6 Application ID value of
[TO BE ASSIGNED BY IANA] in the Auth-Application-Id AVP of the
Capabilities-Exchange-Request and Capabilities-Exchange-Answer
command [5]. The Acct-Application-id AVP needs to include the
Diameter Base Accounting Application ID value of 3 (to support the
split accounting model [15]).
4. Protocol Description
4.1. Support for Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and EAP
The use of IKEv2 with EAP between the MN and the HA allows the AAA to
authenticate the MN. When EAP is used with IKEv2, the Diameter EAP
application, as defined in [7], is re-used. EAP methods that do not
establish a shared key SHOULD NOT be used, as they are subject to a
number of man-in-the-middle attacks as stated in Section 2.16 and
Section 5 of RFC 4306 [8]. AVPs specific to Mobile IPv6
bootstrapping are added to the EAP application commands.
Figure 2 shows the message flow involved during the authentication
phase when EAP is used.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
Mobile Home Diameter
Node Agent Server
| | |
| HDR, SAi1, KEi, Ni (1) | |
|-------------------------------->| |
| | |
| HDR, SAr1, KEr, Nr, [CERTREQ](2)| |
|<--------------------------------| |
| | |
| HDR, SK{IDi,[CERTREQ,] [IDr,] | |
| [CP(CFG_REQUEST),] | |
| SAi2, TSi, TSr} (3) | |
|-------------------------------->| DER (EAP-Response) (4) |
| |------------------------->|
| | |
| | DEA (EAP-Request) (5) |
| HDR, SK{IDr, [CERT,] AUTH, EAP} |<-------------------------|
|<------------------------------- | |
| | |
| HDR, SK{EAP} | |
|-------------------------------->| DER (EAP-Response) |
| |------------------------->|
| | |
| | DEA (EAP-Request) |
| HDR, SK{EAP-Request} |<-------------------------|
|<--------------------------------| |
| | |
| HDR, SK{EAP-Response} | |
|-------------------------------->| DER (EAP-Response) |
| |------------------------->|
| ... | ... |
| | |
| | DEA (EAP-Success) |
| |<-------------------------|
| HDR, SK{EAP-Success} | |
|<--------------------------------| |
| | |
| HDR, SK{AUTH} | |
|-------------------------------->| |
| | |
| HDR, SK{AUTH, [CP(CFG_REPLY,] | |
| SAr2, TSi, TSr} | |
|<--------------------------------| |
| | |
Figure 2: Mobile IPv6 bootstrapping using IKEv2 and EAP
The MN and the HA start the interaction with an IKE_SA_INIT exchange.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
In this phase cryptographic algorithms are negotiated, nonces and
Diffie-Hellman parameters are exchanged. Message (3) starts the
IKE_AUTH phase. This second phase authenticates the previous
messages, exchanges identities and certificates and establishes the
first CHILD_SA. It is used to mutually authenticate the MN (acting
as an IKEv2 Initiator) and the HA (acting as an IKEv2 Responder).
The identity of the user/MN is provided in the IDi field. The MN
indicates its willingness to be authenticated via EAP by omitting the
AUTH field in message (3) (see Section 2.16 of [8]).
As part of the authentication process, the MN MAY request a Home-
Address, a Home Prefix or suggests one, see [4], using a CFG_REQUEST
payload in the message (3).
The HA extracts the IDi field from the message (3) and sends a
Diameter-EAP-Request (DER) message (4) towards the authenticating
Diameter server. The EAP-Payload AVP contains a EAP-Response/
Identity with the identity extracted from the IDi field.
This message is routed to the MNs Diameter server/EAP server. The
Diameter server selects the EAP method and replies with the DEA
Message. Depending on the type of EAP method chosen, a number of DER
and DEA messages carry the method specific exchanges between the MN
and the Diameter server/EAP server.
At the end of the EAP authentication phase, the Diameter server
indicates the result of the authentication in the Result-Code AVP and
provides the corresponding EAP packet (EAP Success or EAP Failure).
The last IKEv2 message sent by the HA contains the Home Address or
the Home Prefix. In the latter case, a CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange is
necessary to setup IPSec SAs for Mobile IPv6 signaling.
In some deployment scenario, the HA may also acts as a IKEv2
Responder for IPSec VPN access. A problem in this case is that the
IKEv2 responder may not know if IKEv2 is used for MIP6 service or for
IPSec VPN access. The IKEv2 responder may A network operator needs
to be aware of this limitation.
Eventually, when the HA receives a Binding Update (BU), the HA
authenticates and authorizes the MN. It is RECOMMENDED that the HA
sends an accounting request message every time it receives a BU.
4.2. Support for Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and Certificates
When IKEv2 is used with certificate-based authentication, the
Diameter NASREQ application [9] is used to authorize the MN for the
Mobile IPv6 service. The IDi payload extracted from the IKE_AUTH
message MUST correspond to the identity in the MN's certificate.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
This identity is then used by the Home Agent to populate the User-
Name AVP in the succeeding AA-Request message. Further PKI-related
procedures such as certificate revocation checking are out of scope
of this document.
4.3. Support for Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and Pre-Shared Secrets
When IKEv2 is used with PSK-based initiator authentication, the
Diameter NASREQ application [9] is re-used to authorize the MN for
the Mobile IPv6 service. The IDi payload extracted from the IKE_AUTH
message has to contain an identity that is meaningful for the
Diameter infrastructure, such as a Network Access Identifier (NAI),
and is then used by the Home Agent to populate the User-Name AVP in
the succeeding AA-Request message.
4.4. Support for the Mobile IPv6 Authentication Protocol
Figure 3 shows the message sequence between the MN, the HA and the
Diameter server during the registration when MIPv6 Authentication
Protocol is used. BU and Binding Acknowledgement (BA) messages are
used in the binding registration process. This exchange triggers the
Diameter interaction.
According to [3] the MN uses the Mobile Node Identifier Option,
specifically the MN-NAI mobility option (as defined in [16]) to
identify itself.
Receiving the BU at the HA initiates a MIP6-Request-Message to the
Diameter server, which in turn responds with a MIP6-Answer-Message.
The Home Agent also provides the assigned Home Address to the
Diameter server in the MIP-Mobile-Node-Address AVP.
The procedure described here for the Mobile IPv6 Authentication
Protocol is only needed for the initial BU received by the HA. When
the HA receives subsequent BUs, they are processed locally in the HA.
It is RECOMMENDED that the HA sends an accounting request message
every time it receives a Binding Update.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
Mobile Home Diameter
Node Agent Server
| | |
| | |
| Binding Update |MIP6-Request-Message |
|------------------------------------>|-------------------->|
| (Mobile Node Identifier Option, | |
| Mobility Message Replay Protection | |
| Option, Authentication Option) | |
| | |
| | |
| Binding Acknowledgement |MIP6-Answer-Message |
|<------------------------------------|<--------------------|
| (Mobile Node Identifier Option | |
| Mobility Message Replay Protection | |
| Option, Authentication Option) | |
Figure 3: MIPv6 Bootstrapping using the MIPv6 Authentication Protocol
4.5. Mobile IPv6 Session Management
The Diameter server may maintain state or may be stateless. This is
indicated in the Auth-Session-State AVP (or its absence). The HA
MUST support the Authorization Session State Machine defined in [5].
Moreover, the following four commands may be exchanged between the HA
and the Diameter server.
4.5.1. Session-Termination-Request
The Session-Termination-Request (STR) message [5] is sent by the HA
to inform the Diameter server that an authorized session is being
terminated.
4.5.2. Session-Termination-Answer
The Session-Termination-Answer (STA) message [5] is sent by the
Diameter server to acknowledge the notification that the session has
been terminated.
4.5.3. Abort-Session-Request
The Abort-Session-Request (ASR) message [5] is sent by the Diameter
server to terminate the session. This fulfills one of the
requirement described in [14].
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
4.5.4. Abort-Session-Answer
The Abort-Session-Answer (ASA) message [5] is sent by the Home Agent
in response to an ASR message.
4.6. Accounting for Mobile IPv6 services
The HA MUST be able act as a Diameter client collecting accounting
records needed for service control and charging. The HA MUST support
the accounting procedures (specifically the command codes mentioned
below) and the Accounting Session State Machine as defined in [5].
The command codes, exchanged between the HA and Diameter server for
accounting purposes, are provided in the following subsections.
The Diameter application design guideline [15] defines two separate
models for accounting:
Split accounting model:
According to this model, the accounting messages use the Diameter
base accounting application ID (value of 3). Since accounting is
treated as an independent application, accounting commands may be
routed separately from the rest of application messages and thus
the accounting messages generally end up in a central accounting
server. Since Diameter Mobile IPv6 application does not define
its own unique accounting commands, this is the preferred choice,
since it permits use of centralized accounting for several
applications.
Coupled accounting model:
In this model, the accounting messages will use the application ID
of the Mobile IPv6 application. This means that accounting
messages will be routed like any other Mobile IPv6 application
messages. This requires the Diameter server in charge of Mobile
IPv6 application to handle the accounting records (e.g., sends
them to a proper accounting server).
As mentioned above, the preferred choice is to use the split
accounting model and thus to choose Diameter base accounting
application ID (value of 3) for accounting messages.
4.6.1. Accounting-Request
The Accounting-Request command [5] is sent by the HA to the Diameter
server to exchange accounting information regarding the MN with the
Diameter server.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
4.6.2. Accounting-Answer
The Accounting-Answer command [5] is sent by the Diameter server to
the HA to acknowledge receiving an Accounting-Request.
5. Command Codes
5.1. Command Code for Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and EAP
For usage of Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and EAP this document re-uses the
Diameter EAP application [7] commands. The following commands are
used to carry MIPv6 related bootstrapping AVPs.
Command-Name Abbrev. Code Reference Application
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Diameter-EAP-Request DER 268 RFC 4072 Diameter Mobile IPv6 (TBD)
Diameter-EAP-Answer DEA 268 RFC 4072 Diameter Mobile IPv6 (TBD)
Figure 4: Command Codes
5.1.1. Diameter-EAP-Request
The Diameter-EAP-Request (DER) message [7], indicated by the Command-
Code field set to 268 and the 'R' bit set in the Command Flags field,
is sent by the HA to the Diameter server to initiate a Mobile IPv6
service authentication and authorization procedure. The DER message
format is the same as defined in [7]. The Application-ID field of
the Diameter Header MUST be set to the Diameter Mobile IPv6
Application ID [TO BE ASSIGNED TO IANA].
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
<Diameter-EAP-Request> ::= < Diameter Header: 268, REQ, PXY >
< Session-Id >
{ Auth-Application-Id }
{ Origin-Host }
{ Origin-Realm }
{ Destination-Realm }
{ Auth-Request-Type }
[ Destination-Host ]
[ NAS-Identifier ]
[ NAS-IP-Address ]
[ NAS-IPv6-Address ]
[ NAS-Port-Type ]
[ User-Name ]
...
[ Called-Station-Id]
...
{ EAP-Payload }
...
[ MIP6-Feature-Vector ]
{ MIP-Home-Agent-Address }
{ MIP-Mobile-Node-Address }
[ QoS-Capability ]
* [ QoS-Resources ]
...
* [ AVP ]
5.1.2. Diameter-EAP-Answer
The Diameter-EAP-Answer (DEA) message defined in [7], indicated by
the Command-Code field set to 268 and 'R' bit cleared in the Command
Flags field, is sent in response to the Diameter-EAP-Request message
(DER). If the Mobile IPv6 authentication procedure was successful
then the response MAY include any set of bootstrapping AVPs.
The DEA message format is the same as defined in [7]. The
Application-Id field in the Diameter header MUST be set to the
Diameter Mobile IPv6 Application-Id [TO BE ASSIGNED BY IANA].
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
<Diameter-EAP-Answer> ::= < Diameter Header: 268, PXY >
< Session-Id >
{ Auth-Application-Id }
{ Auth-Request-Type }
{ Result-Code }
{ Origin-Host }
{ Origin-Realm }
[ User-Name ]
[ EAP-Payload ]
...
[ MIP-Mobile-Node-Address ]
[ MIP6-Feature-Vector ]
* [ QoS-Resources ]
...
* [ AVP ]
5.2. Command Code for Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2 and Certificate- and PSK-
based Authentication
This document re-uses the Diameter NASREQ application commands. The
following commands are used to carry MIPv6 related bootstrapping
AVPs.
Command-Name Abbrev. Code Reference Application
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AA-Request AAR 265 RFC 4005 Diameter Mobile IPv6 (TBD)
AA-Answer AAA 265 RFC 4005 Diameter Mobile IPv6 (TBD)
Figure 7: Command Codes
5.2.1. AA-Request
The AA-Request (AAR) message [9], indicated by the Command-Code field
set to 265 and the 'R' bit set in the Command Flags field, is sent by
the HA to the Diameter server to initiate a Mobile IPv6 service
authentication and authorization procedure. The AAR message format
is the same as defined in [9]. The Application-ID field of the
Diameter Header MUST be set to the Diameter Mobile IPv6 Application
ID [TO BE ASSIGNED TO IANA].
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
<AA-Request> ::= < Diameter Header: 265, REQ, PXY >
< Session-Id >
{ Auth-Application-Id }
{ Origin-Host }
{ Origin-Realm }
{ Destination-Realm }
{ Auth-Request-Type }
[ Destination-Host ]
[ NAS-Identifier ]
[ NAS-IP-Address ]
[ NAS-IPv6-Address ]
[ NAS-Port-Type ]
[ User-Name ]
...
[ Called-Station-Id]
...
[ MIP6-Feature-Vector ]
{ MIP-Home-Agent-Address }
{ MIP-Mobile-Node-Address }
...
[ QoS-Capability ]
* [ QoS-Resources ]
...
* [ AVP ]
5.2.2. AA-Answer
The AA-Answer (AAA) message defined in [9], indicated by the Command-
Code field set to 265 and 'R' bit cleared in the Command Flags field,
is sent in response to the AA-Request message (AAR). If the Mobile
IPv6 authentication procedure was successful then the response MAY
include any set of bootstrapping AVPs.
The AAA message format is the same as defined in [9]. The
Application-Id field in the Diameter header MUST be set to the
Diameter Mobile IPv6 Application-Id [TO BE ASSIGNED BY IANA].
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
<AA-Answer> ::= < Diameter Header: 265, PXY >
< Session-Id >
{ Auth-Application-Id }
{ Auth-Request-Type }
{ Result-Code }
{ Origin-Host }
{ Origin-Realm }
[ User-Name ]
[ Authorization-Lifetime ]
...
[ MIP-Mobile-Node-Address ]
[ MIP6-Feature-Vector ]
[ MIP-MN-HA-MSA ]
* [ QoS-Resources ]
...
* [ AVP ]
When IKEv2 is used with PSK-based initiator authentication, the pre-
shared secret is carried inside the MIP-MN-HA-MSA AVP. The pre-
shared secret SHOULD NOT be user's long term secret and it is
RECOMMENDED that a short-term keying material specifically created
for this purpose is used instead.
5.3. Command Codes for MIPv6 Authentication Protocol Support
This section defines the commands that are used for support with the
MIPv6 Authentication Protocol.
Command-Name Abbrev. Code Reference Application
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MIP6-Request-Message MRM TBD 5.3.1 Diameter Mobile IPv6 (TBD)
MIP6-Answer-Message MAM TBD 5.3.2 Diameter Mobile IPv6 (TBD)
Command Codes
5.3.1. MIP6-Request-Message
The MIP6-Request-Message (MRM), indicated by the Command-Code field
set to TBD and the 'R' bit set in the Command Flags field, is sent by
the HA, acting as a Diameter client, in order to request the
authentication and authorization of a MN.
Although the HA provides the Diameter server with a replay protection
related information, the HA is responsible for the replay protection.
The message format is shown below.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
<MIP6-Request-Message> ::= < Diameter Header: XXX, REQ, PXY >
< Session-ID >
{ Auth-Application-Id }
{ User-Name }
{ Destination-Realm }
{ Origin-Host }
{ Origin-Realm }
[ Acct-Multi-Session-Id ]
[ Destination-Host ]
[ Origin-State-Id ]
[ NAS-Identifier ]
[ NAS-IP-Address ]
[ NAS-IPv6-Address ]
[ NAS-Port-Type ]
[ MIP6-Feature-Vector ]
[ MIP-MN-AAA-SPI ]
{ MIP-Mobile-Node-Address }
{ MIP-Home-Agent-Address }
[ MIP-Careof-Address ]
[ MIP-Authenticator ]
[ MIP-MAC-Mobility-Data ]
[ MIP-Timestamp ]
[ QoS-Capability ]
* [ QoS-Resources ]
[ Authorization-Lifetime ]
[ Auth-Session-State ]
* [ Proxy-Info ]
* [ Route-Record ]
* [ AVP ]
5.3.2. MIP6-Answer-Message
The MIP6-Answer-Message (MAM) message, indicated by the Command-Code
field set to TBD and the 'R' bit cleared in the Command Flags field,
is sent by the Diameter server in response to the MIP6-Request-
Message message. The User-Name MAY be included in the MAM if it is
present in the MRM. The Result-Code AVP MAY contain one of the
values defined in Section 7, in addition to the values defined in RFC
3588 [5].
An MAM message with the Result-Code AVP set to DIAMETER_SUCCESS MUST
include the MIP-Mobile-Node-Address AVP.
The message format is shown below.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
<MIP6-Answer-Message> ::= < Diameter Header: XXX, PXY >
< Session-Id >
{ Auth-Application-Id }
{ Result-Code }
{ Origin-Host }
{ Origin-Realm }
[ Acct-Multi-Session-Id ]
[ User-Name ]
[ Authorization-Lifetime ]
[ Auth-Session-State ]
[ Error-Message ]
[ Error-Reporting-Host ]
[ Re-Auth-Request-Type ]
[ MIP6-Feature-Vector ]
[ MIP-Home-Agent-Address ]
[ MIP-Mobile-Node-Address ]
[ MIP-MN-HA-MSA ]
* [ QoS-Resources ]
[ Origin-State-Id ]
* [ Proxy-Info ]
* [ AVP ]
6. AVPs
To provide support for RFC 4285 [3] and for RFC 4877 [4] the AVPs in
the following subsections are needed. RFC 3588, RFC 4004 and RFC
4005 defined AVPs are reused whenever possible without changing the
existing semantics of those AVPs.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
+--------------------------+
| AVP Flag rules |
+----+-----+----+-----+----+
AVP Defined | | |SHLD| MUST|MAY |
Attribute Name Code in Value Type |MUST| MAY | NOT| NOT|Encr|
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP6-Feature- TBD Note 1 Unsigned64 | M | P | | V | Y |
| Vector | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-Mobile- | M | P | | V | Y |
| Node-Address 334 RFC4004 Address | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-Home- 334 RFC4004 Address | M | P | | V | Y |
| Agent-Address | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|User-Name 1 RFC3588 UTF8String | M | P | | V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|Called- 30 RFC4005 UTF8String | M | P | | V | Y |
| Station-Id | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|QoS-Capability TBD Note 2 Grouped | | P | | M,V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|QoS-Resources TBD Note 2 Grouped | | P | | M,V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-MN-HA-MSA TBD 6.12. Grouped | M | P | | V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
AVPs for Mobile IPv6 with IKEv2
Note 1: The MIP6-Feature-Vector is defined in Section 4.7.4 of [10].
Note 2: The QoS-Capability and QoS-Resource AVPs are defined in
Sections 4.1 and 4.3 of [11].
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
+--------------------------+
| AVP Flag rules |
+----+-----+----+-----+----+
AVP Section | | |SHLD| MUST|MAY |
Attribute Name Code Defined Value Type |MUST| MAY | NOT| NOT|Encr|
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP6-Feature- TBD Note 1 Unsigned64 | M | P | | V | Y |
| Vector | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|User-Name 1 RFC3588 UTF8String | M | P | | V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-MN-AAA-SPI 341 RFC4004 Unsigned32 | M | P | | V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-MN-HA-SPI TBD 6.4 Unsigned32 | M | P | | V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-Mobile- 333 RFC4004 Address | M | P | | V | Y |
| Node-Address | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-Home- 334 RFC4004 Address | M | P | | V | Y |
| Agent-Address | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-Careof- TBD 6.7 Address | M | P | | V | Y |
| Address | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP- TBD 6.8 OctetString| M | P | | V | Y |
| Authenticator | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-MAC- TBD 6.9 OctetString| M | P | | V | Y |
| Mobility-Data | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-Session-Key 343 6.10 OctetString| M | P | | V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-MSA- 367 RFC4004 Unsigned32 | M | P | | V | Y |
| Lifetime | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-MN-HA-MSA TBD 6.12 Grouped | M | P | | V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-Algorithm- 345 6.13 Enumerated | M | P | | V | Y |
| Type | | | | | |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-Replay-Mode 346 6.14 Enumerated | M | P | | V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|MIP-Timestamp TBD 6.16 Time | M | P | | V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|QoS-Capability TBD Note 2 Grouped | | P | | M,V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
|QoS-Resources TBD Note 2 Grouped | | P | | M,V | Y |
+-----------------------------------------+----+-----+----+-----+----+
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
AVPs for the Mobile IPv6 Authentication Protocol
Note 1: The MIP6-Feature-Vector is defined in Section 4.7.4 of [10].
Note 2: The QoS-Capability and QoS-Resource AVPs are defined in
Sections 4.1 and 4.3 of [11].
6.1. User-Name AVP
The User-Name AVP (AVP Code 1) is of type UTF8String and contains an
NAI extracted from the MN-NAI mobility option included in the
received BU message. Alternatively, the NAI can be extracted from
the IKEv2 IDi payload included in the IKE_AUTH message sent by the
IKE initiator.
6.2. Called-Station-Id AVP
The Called-Station-Id AVP (AVP Code 30) is of type UTF8String and
contains the string extracted from the IKEv2 IDr payload, if
available in the IKE_AUTH message sent by the IKE initiator.
6.3. MIP-MN-AAA-SPI AVP
The MIP-MN-AAA-SPI AVP (AVP Code 341) is of type Unsigned32 and
contains an SPI code extracted from the Mobility Message
Authentication Option included in the received BU message.
This AVP is re-used from [12].
6.4. MIP-MN-HA-SPI AVP
The MIP-MN-HA-SPI AVP (AVP Code TBD) is of type Unsigned32 and
contains an SPI code provided by the Diameter server for the Mobile
IPv6 MN-HA Authentication Option.
6.5. MIP-Mobile-Node-Address AVP
The MIP-Mobile-Node-Address AVP (AVP Code 333) is of type Address and
contains the Home Agent assigned IPv6 Home Address of the Mobile
Node.
If the MIP-Mobile-Node-Address AVP contains unspecified IPv6 address
(0::0) in a request message, then the Home Agent expects the Diameter
server to assign the Home Address in a subsequent reply message. In
case the Diameter server assigns only a Home Network Prefix to the
Mobile Node the lower 64 bits of the MIP-Mobile-Node-Address AVP
provided address MUST be set to zero.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
This AVP is re-used from [12].
6.6. MIP-Home-Agent-Address AVP
The MIP-Home-Agent-Address AVP (AVP Code 334) is of type Address and
contains the IPv6 address of the Home Agent. The Home Agent address
is the same as in the received BU message that triggered the
authentication and authorization procedure towards the Diameter
server. This AVP is re-used from [12].
6.7. MIP-Careof-Address AVP
The MIP-Careof-Address AVP (AVP Code TBD) is of type Address and
contains the IPv6 Care-of Address of the Mobile Node. The Home Agent
extracts this IP address from the received BU message.
6.8. MIP-Authenticator AVP
The MIP-Authenticator AVP (AVP Code TBD) is of type OctetString and
contains the Authenticator Data from the received BU message. The
Home Agent extracts this data from the MN-AAA Mobility Message
Authentication Option included in the received BU message.
6.9. MIP-MAC-Mobility-Data AVP
The MIP-MAC-Mobility-Data AVP (AVP Code TBD) is of type OctetString
and contains the calculated MAC_Mobility_Data, as defined in [3].
6.10. MIP-Session-Key AVP
The MIP-Session-Key AVP (AVP Code 343) is of type OctetString and
contains the MN-HA shared secret (i.e., the session key) for the
associated Mobile IPv6 MH-HA authentication option. When the
Diameter server computes the session key it is placed in this AVP.
The MIP-Session-Key AVP may also be used to convey a pre-shared
secret when IKEv2 is used with PSK-based initiator authentication.
This AVP is re-used from [12].
6.11. MIP-MSA-Lifetime AVP
The MIP-MSA-Lifetime AVP (AVP Code 367) is of type Unsigned32 and
represents the period of time (in seconds) for which the session key
(see Section 6.10) is valid. The associated session key MUST NOT be
used if the lifetime has expired.
This AVP is re-used from [12].
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
6.12. MIP-MN-HA-MSA AVP
The MIP-MN-HA-MSA AVP (AVP Code TBD) is of type Grouped and contains
the session related information for use with the MIPv6 Authentication
Protocol.
MIP-MN-HA-MSA ::= < AVP Header: TBD >
{ MIP-Session-Key }
{ MIP-MSA-Lifetime }
[ MIP-MN-HA-SPI ]
[ MIP-Algorithm-Type ]
[ MIP-Replay-Mode ]
* [ AVP ]
6.13. MIP-Algorithm-Type AVP
The MIP-Algorithm-Type AVP (AVP Code 345) is of type Enumerated and
contains Algorithm identifier for the associated Mobile IPv6 MN-HA
Authentication Option. The Diameter server selects the algorithm
type. Existing algorithm types are defined in RFC 4004 that also
fulfill current RFC 4285 requirements.
This AVP is re-used from [12].
6.14. MIP-Replay-Mode AVP
The MIP-Replay-Mode AVP (AVP Code 346) is of type Enumerated and
contains the replay mode the Home Agent for authenticating the mobile
node. The replay modes, defined in RFC 4004 [12], are supported.
This AVP is re-used from [12].
6.15. MIP6-Feature-Vector AVP
This AVP is defined in [10]. This document defines a new capability
bit for signaling the support of Mobile IPv6 route optimization. The
following capability is defined in this document:
RO_SUPPORTED (0x0000000800000000)
Route optimization is supported. When the Home Agent sets this
bit, it indicates support for the route optimization. If this bit
is unset in the returned Mobility-Capability AVP, the AAAH does
not authorize route optimization for the MN.
In a case the Home Agent or the AAAH cannot authorize the use of
route optimization then the Home Agent SHOULD send a Binding
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
Acknowledgement with a Status Code set to
ACCEPTED_BUT_NO_ROUTE_OPTIMIZATION (status code TBD). This Status
Code indicates that the binding registration succeeded but the
Home Agent will fail all possible subsequent route optimization
attempts because of subscription or operator policy.
USER_TRAFFIC_ENCRYPTION (0x0000000100000000)
User plane traffic encryption is supported. When the Home Agent
sets this bit, it indicates support for the user plane traffic
encryption between the MN and the Home Agent. If this bit is
unset in the returned Mobility-Capability AVP, the AAAH does not
authorize user plane traffic encryption for the MN because of
subscription or operator policy.
In the case the AAAH cannot authorize the use of route
optimization then the Home Agent SHOULD send a Binding
Acknowledgement with a Status Code set to
ACCEPTED_BUT_NO_TRAFFIC_ENCRYPTION (status code TBD). This Status
Code indicates that the binding registration succeeded but the
Home Agent will silently discard all encrypted user plane packets
sent by the MN to the Home Agent.
6.16. MIP-Timestamp AVP
The MIP-Timestamp AVP (AVP Code TBD) is of type Time and may contain
the timestamp value from the Mobility message replay protection
option, defined in [3]. The Home Agent extracts this value from the
received BU message, if available.
6.17. QoS-Capability AVP
The QoS-Capability AVP is defined in [11] and contains a list of
supported Quality of Service profiles.
6.18. QoS-Resources AVP
The QoS-Resources AVP is defined in [11] and provides QoS and packet
filtering capabilities.
6.19. Coupled Accounting Model Accounting AVPs
Diameter Mobile IPv6 application is used in the case of the coupled
account model. Diameter Mobile IPv4 application [12] accounting AVPs
are reused in this document. The following AVPs MUST be included in
the accounting request message:
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
o Accounting-Input-Octets: Number of octets in IP packets received
from the mobile node.
o Accounting-Output-Octets: Number of octets in IP packets sent by
the mobile node
o Accounting-Input-Packets: Number of IP packets received from the
mobile node.
o Accounting-Output-Packets: Number of IP packets sent by the mobile
node.
o Acct-Multi-Session-Id: Used to link together multiple related
accounting sessions, where each session would have a unique
Session-Id, but the same Acct-Multi-Session-Id AVP.
o Acct-Session-Time: Indicates the length of the current session in
seconds.
o MIP6-Feature-Vector: The supported features for this mobility
service session.
o MIP-Mobile-Node-Address: The Home Address of the mobile node.
o MIP-Home-Agent-Address: The current home agent of the mobile node.
Other APVs that SHOULD be included in the accounting request message
include:
o QoS-Resources: Assigned QoS resources for the mobile node.
o QoS-Capability: The QoS capability related to the assigned QoS-
Resources.
o MIP-Careof-Address: The current Care-of Address of the mobile
node.
7. Result-Code AVP Values
This section defines new Result-Code [5] values that MUST be
supported by all Diameter implementations that conform to this
specification.
7.1. Permanent Failures
Errors that fall within the permanent failures category are used to
inform the peer that the request failed and SHOULD NOT be attempted
again.
DIAMETER_ERROR_END_TO_END_MIP6_KEY_ENCRYPTION (Status Code TBD)
This error is used by the Diameter server to inform the peer that
the requested Mobile IPv6 session keys could not be delivered via
a security association.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
8. AVP Occurrence Tables
The following tables present the AVPs defined in this document and
their occurrences in Diameter messages. Note that AVPs that can only
be present within a Grouped AVP are not represented in this table.
The table uses the following symbols:
0:
The AVP MUST NOT be present in the message.
0+:
Zero or more instances of the AVP MAY be present in the message.
0-1:
Zero or one instance of the AVP MAY be present in the message.
1:
One instance of the AVP MUST be present in the message.
8.1. AAR, AAA, DER, DEA, MRM and MAM AVP/Command-Code Table
+-----------------------------------+
| Command-Code |
|-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
AVP Name | AAR | AAA | DER | DEA | MRM | MAM |
-------------------------------|-----+-----|-----+-----+-----+-----+
MIP6-Feature-Vector | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
MIP-Mobile-Node-Address | 1 | 0-1 | 1 | 0-1 | 1 | 0-1 |
MIP-MN-AAA-SPI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0 |
MIP-Home-Agent-Address | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
MIP-Careof-Address | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0 |
MIP-Authenticator | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0 |
MIP-MAC-Mobility-Data | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0 |
MIP-MSA-Lifetime | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
MIP-MN-HA-MSA | 0 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 |
MIP-Timestamp | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
User-Name | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1 | 0-1 |
Called-Station-Id | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0 |
QoS-Resources | *0 | *0 | *0 | *0 | *0 | *0 |
QoS-Capability | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0 |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
8.2. Coupled Accounting Model AVP Table
The table in this section is used to represent which AVPs defined in
this document are to be present in the Accounting messages, as
defined in [5].
+-------------+
| Command-Code|
|------+------+
Attribute Name | ACR | ACA |
-------------------------------------|------+------+
Accounting-Input-Octets | 1 | 0-1 |
Accounting-Input-Packets | 1 | 0-1 |
Accounting-Output-Octets | 1 | 0-1 |
Accounting-Output-Packets | 1 | 0-1 |
Acct-Multi-Session-Id | 1 | 0-1 |
Acct-Session-Time | 1 | 0-1 |
MIP6-Feature-Vector | 1 | 0-1 |
MIP-Home-Agent-Address | 1 | 0-1 |
MIP-Mobile-Node-Address | 1 | 0-1 |
Event-Timestamp | 0-1 | 0 |
MIP-Careof-Address | 0-1 | 0 |
QoS-Capability | *0 | *0 |
QoS-Resources | *0 | *0 |
-------------------------------------|------+------+
9. IANA Considerations
This section contains the namespaces that have either been created in
this specification or had their values assigned to existing
namespaces managed by IANA.
9.1. Command Codes
IANA is requested to allocate a command code value for the MIP6-
Request-Message (MRM) and for the MIP6-Answer-Message (MAM) from the
Command Code namespace defined in [5]. See Section 5 for the
assignment of the namespace in this specification.
9.2. AVP Codes
This specification requires IANA to register the following new AVPs
from the AVP Code namespace defined in [5].
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
o MIP-Careof-Address
o MIP-Authenticator
o MIP-MAC-Mobility-Data
o MIP-Timestamp
o MIP-MN-HA-SPI
o MIP-MN-HA-MSA
The AVPs are defined in Section 6.
9.3. Result-Code AVP Values
This specification requests IANA to allocate new values to the
Result-Code AVP (AVP Code 268) namespace defined in [5]. See
Section 7 for the assignment of the namespace in this specification.
9.4. Application Identifier
This specification requires IANA to allocate a new value for
"Diameter Mobile IPv6" from the Application Identifier namespace
defined in [5].
9.5. Namespaces
This specification defines a new value to the Mobility Capability
registry (see [10]) for use with the MIP6-Feature-Vector AVP:
Token | Value | Description
---------------------------------+----------------------+------------
RO_SUPPORTED | 0x0000000800000000 | RFC TBD
USER_TRAFFIC_ENCRYPTION | 0x0000000100000000 | RFC TBD
9.6. Mobile IPv6 Status Codes
This specification defines a new Mobile IPv6 [1] Status Code value.
The Status Code must be allocated from the range 0-127:
Status Code | Value | Description
----------------------------------------+---------------+------------
ACCEPTED_BUT_NO_ROUTE_OPTIMIZATION | is set to TBD | RFC TBD
ACCEPTED_BUT_NO_TRAFFIC_ENCRYPTION | is set to TBD | RFC TBD
10. Security Considerations
The security considerations for the Diameter interaction required to
accomplish the split scenario are described in in [2]. Additionally,
the security considerations of the Diameter Base protocol [5],
Diameter EAP application [7] are applicable to this document. This
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
document does not introduce new security vulnerabilities.
11. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Jari Arkko, Tolga Asversen, Pasi
Eronen, Santiago Zapata Hernandez, Anders Kristensen, Avi Lior, John
Loughney, Ahmad Muhanna, Behcet Sarikaya, Basavaraj Patil, Vijay
Devarapalli, Lionel Morand, Domagoj Premec and Yoshihiro Ohba for all
the useful discussions. Ahmad Muhanna provided a detailed review of
the document in August 2007.
We would also like to thank our Area Director, Dan Romascanu, for his
support.
Hannes Tschofenig would like to thank the European Commission support
in the co-funding of the ENABLE project, where this work is partly
being developed.
Julien Bournelle would like to thank GET/INT since he began this work
while he was under their employ.
12. References
12.1. Normative References
[1] Johnson, D., Perkins, C., and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support in
IPv6", RFC 3775, June 2004.
[2] Giaretta, G., Kempf, J., and V. Devarapalli, "Mobile IPv6
Bootstrapping in Split Scenario", RFC 5026, October 2007.
[3] Patel, A., Leung, K., Khalil, M., Akhtar, H., and K. Chowdhury,
"Authentication Protocol for Mobile IPv6",
draft-ietf-mip6-rfc4285bis-02 (work in progress),
December 2007.
[4] Devarapalli, V. and F. Dupont, "Mobile IPv6 Operation with
IKEv2 and the Revised IPsec Architecture", RFC 4877,
April 2007.
[5] Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J. Arkko,
"Diameter Base Protocol", RFC 3588, September 2003.
[6] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
[7] Eronen, P., Hiller, T., and G. Zorn, "Diameter Extensible
Authentication Protocol (EAP) Application", RFC 4072,
August 2005.
[8] Kaufman, C., "Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) Protocol",
RFC 4306, December 2005.
[9] Calhoun, P., Zorn, G., Spence, D., and D. Mitton, "Diameter
Network Access Server Application", RFC 4005, August 2005.
[10] Korhonen, J., Bournelle, J., Tschofenig, H., Perkins, C., and
K. Chowdhury, "Diameter Mobile IPv6: Support for Network Access
Server to Diameter Server Interaction",
draft-ietf-dime-mip6-integrated-08 (work in progress),
February 2008.
[11] Korhonen, J., Tschofenig, H., Arumaithurai, M., and M. Jones,
"Quality of Service Attributes for Diameter",
draft-ietf-dime-qos-attributes-04 (work in progress),
January 2008.
[12] Calhoun, P., Johansson, T., Perkins, C., Hiller, T., and P.
McCann, "Diameter Mobile IPv4 Application", RFC 4004,
August 2005.
12.2. Informative References
[13] Patel, A. and G. Giaretta, "Problem Statement for bootstrapping
Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)", RFC 4640, September 2006.
[14] Giaretta, G., Guardini, I., Demaria, E., Bournelle, J., and R.
Lopez, "AAA Goals for Mobile IPv6",
draft-ietf-mext-aaa-ha-goals-00 (work in progress),
December 2007.
[15] Fajardo, V., Asveren, T., Tschofenig, H., McGregor, G., and J.
Loughney, "Diameter Applications Design Guidelines",
draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-06 (work in progress),
January 2008.
[16] Patel, A., Leung, K., Khalil, M., Akhtar, H., and K. Chowdhury,
"Mobile Node Identifier Option for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)",
RFC 4283, November 2005.
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
Authors' Addresses
Jouni Korhonen
TeliaSonera
P.O.Box 970
Sonera FIN-00051
Finland
Email: jouni.korhonen@teliasonera.com
Hannes Tschofenig
Nokia Siemens Networks
Linnoitustie 6
Espoo 02600
Finland
Phone: +358 (50) 4871445
Email: Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net
URI: http://www.tschofenig.com
Julien Bournelle
Orange Labs
38-4O rue du general Leclerc
Issy-Les-Moulineaux 92794
France
Email: julien.bournelle@orange-ftgroup.com
Gerardo Giaretta
Qualcomm
5775 MoreHouse Dr
San Diego, CA 92121
USA
Email: gerardo.giaretta@gmail.com
Madjid Nakhjiri
Motorola
USA
Email: madjid.nakhjiri@motorola.com
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft Diameter MIP6: HA-to-AAAH Support February 2008
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
Korhonen, et al. Expires August 28, 2008 [Page 33]