DNS Extensions Working Group S. Rose
Internet-Draft NIST
Updates: 4034 (if approved) February 22, 2010
Intended status: Standards Track
Expires: August 26, 2010
DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY IANA Registry Algorithm Status Addition
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-02
Abstract
The DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) has an IANA registry to allocate
cryptographic algorithm suites for use in generating digital
signatures over DNS data. Newly introduced cryptographic algorithms
to DNSSEC mean implementers need to know which algorithms need to be
implemented, which are optional, and which are obsolete. This
document adds a column to the IANA registry table for Domain Name
System Security (DNSSEC) Algorithm Numbers to list their status for
use.
Requirements Language
The key words "MANDATORY", "DISCRETIONARY", "OBSOLETE",
"DISCOURAGED", "ENCOURAGED" and "RESERVED" in this document are to be
interpreted as described in
[I-D.ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words]
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
Rose Expires August 26, 2010 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft IANA-Registry-Fix February 2010
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 26, 2010.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the BSD License.
This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
Contributions published or made publicly available before November
10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
than English.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. DNS Security Algorithm Number Subregisitry Fixes . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Individual Domain Name System Security (DNSSEC)
Algorithm Number Registry Entry Fixes . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2. Domain Name System Security (DNSSEC) Algorithm Number
Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Rose Expires August 26, 2010 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft IANA-Registry-Fix February 2010
5. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Rose Expires August 26, 2010 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft IANA-Registry-Fix February 2010
1. Introduction
The DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) [RFC4033], [RFC4034], and
[RFC4035] uses digital signatures over DNS data to provide source
authentication and integrity protection. DNSSEC uses an IANA
registry to allocate codes for digital signature algorithms
(consisting of a cryptographic algorithm and one-way hash function).
Certain digital signature algorithms are considered MANDATORY to
implement for interoperability while others are listed as OPTIONAL or
OBSOLETE.
The original list of algorithm status is found in [RFC4034]. Other
DNSSEC documents have added new algorithms or changed the status of
algorithms in the registry. However, implementers must read through
all the documents in order to discover which algorithms are mandatory
to implement and which are optional or no longer used.
This document requests a column to be added to the IANA registry for
Domain Name System Security (DNSSEC) Algorithm Numbers. This column
will list the current status of each digital signature algorithm in
the registry.
2. DNS Security Algorithm Number Subregisitry Fixes
The DNS Security Algorithm Number subregistry (part of the Domain
Name System (DNS) Security Number registry) will be modified to
include a new column. This column will contain the current
implementation requirements of the given algorithm. This document
does not make any changes to any other column in the registry table.
There are additional fixes to entries that are described in sub-
section 2.1. The overall new registry table is in sub-section 2.2.
The values for the status were obtained from [RFC4034] with updates
for algorithms specified after the original DNSSEC specification.
The status of algorithms marked OPTIONAL in [RFC4034] are changed to
DISCRETIONARY as defined in
[I-D.ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words]. The status of algorithms
marked NOT RECOMMENDED in [RFC4034] are changed to OBSOLETE as
defined in [I-D.ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words].
2.1. Individual Domain Name System Security (DNSSEC) Algorithm Number
Registry Entry Fixes
This document changes three entries in the Domain Name System
Security (DNSSEC) Algorithm Registry. They are:
The description for allocation number 4 is changed to "Reserved until
2020".
Rose Expires August 26, 2010 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft IANA-Registry-Fix February 2010
The description for allocation number 9 is changed to "Reserved until
2020".
The description for numbers 11-251 is changed from Unassigned to the
following:
* Allocation number 11 is changed to "Reserved until 2020".
* Allocations 12-251 remains Unassigned.
The status of RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 and DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 are both set to
DISCRETIONARY. The status of RSA/SHA-256 and RSA/SHA-512 are set to
ENCOURAGED as it is believed that these algorithms will replace older
algorithms (e.g. RSA/SHA-1) that have a perceived weakness in their
hash algorithm (SHA-1).
Rose Expires August 26, 2010 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft IANA-Registry-Fix February 2010
2.2. Domain Name System Security (DNSSEC) Algorithm Number Registry
As of the current time, the DNS Security Algorithm Number subregistry
would look like the following:
Zone Trans
Number Description Mnem. Sign Sign Status Reference
------ ----------- ------ ---- ----- ------------ ---------
0 Reserved [RFC4398]
1 RSA/MD5 RSAMD5 N Y OBSOLETE [RFC4034],
[RFC3110]
2 Diffie-Hellman DH N Y DISCRETIONARY [RFC2539]
3 DSA/SHA-1 DSASHA1 Y Y DISCRETIONARY [RFC2536],
[RFC4034],
FIPS 186-3,
FIPS 180-3
4 Reserved until ECC
2020
5 RSA/SHA-1 RSASHA1 Y Y MANDATORY [RFC4034]
6 DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 DSA-NSEC3 Y Y DISCRETIONARY [RFC5155]
-SHA1
7 RSASHA1-NSEC3 RSASHA1- Y Y DISCRETIONARY [RFC5155]
-SHA1 NSEC3-
SHA1
8 RSA/SHA-256 RSASHA256 Y * ENCOURAGED [RFC5702]
9 Reserved until
2020
10 RSA/SHA-512 RSASHA512 Y * ENCOURAGED [RFC5702]
11 Reserved until
2020
12-251 Unassigned
252 Reserved for INDIRECT N N DISCRETIONARY [RFC4034]
Indirect keys
253 private algo- PRIVATE Y Y DISCRETIONARY [RFC4034]
254 private algo- PRIVATEOID Y Y DISCRETIONARY [RFC4034]
255 Reserved
The requirement status for all new algorithms will be DISCRETIONARY
unless a Standards Track document changes that (possibly including
the Standards Track document defining the algorithm). Only a
Standards Track document may make an algorithm ENCOURAGED or
MANDATORY or remove the MANDATORY or ENCOURAGED designation (to
DISCOURAGED or OBSOLETE for example).
Rose Expires August 26, 2010 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft IANA-Registry-Fix February 2010
3. IANA Considerations
This document consists entirely of DNS IANA Considerations and
includes the following changes detailed in Section 2.1:
The description of allocation 4 is changed from "Reserved for ECC" to
"Reserved until 2020".
The description of allocation 9 is changed from "Unassigned" to
"Reserved until 2020".
The description for 11-251 is changed from Unassigned to the
following:
* Allocation number 11 is changed to "Reserved until 2020".
* Allocations 12-251 remains Unassigned.
The references for current algorithms in the table in Section 2.2
have been updated to remove obsolete RFC's and replaced with the
current reference.
The references to FIPS 180 and FIPS 186 have been updated (to FIPS
180-3 and FIPS 186-3 respectively) to reflect the latest versions.
These revisions are maintenance updates and the main content of the
FIPS documents have not changed.
The new table is in Section 2.2. The Domain Name System (DNS)
Security Algorithm Number registry is available at http://
www.iana.org/assignments/dns-sec-alg-numbers/
dns-sec-alg-numbers.xhtml.
4. Security Considerations
This document seeks to add a column to an existing IANA registry. It
is not meant to be a discussion on algorithm superiority. No new
security considerations are raised in this document.
5. References
5.1. Normative References
[I-D.ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words] Gudmundsson, O. and S.
Rose, "Definitions for
expressing standards
requirements in IANA
registries.", draft-ogud-
iana-protocol-
Rose Expires August 26, 2010 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft IANA-Registry-Fix February 2010
maintenance-words-02
(work in progress),
January 2010.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words
for use in RFCs to
Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14,
RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC4033] Arends, R., Austein, R.,
Larson, M., Massey, D.,
and S. Rose, "DNS
Security Introduction and
Requirements", RFC 4033,
March 2005.
[RFC4034] Arends, R., Austein, R.,
Larson, M., Massey, D.,
and S. Rose, "Resource
Records for the DNS
Security Extensions",
RFC 4034, March 2005.
[RFC4035] Arends, R., Austein, R.,
Larson, M., Massey, D.,
and S. Rose, "Protocol
Modifications for the DNS
Security Extensions",
RFC 4035, March 2005.
5.2. Informative References
[FIPS.180-3.2008] National Institute of
Standards and Technology,
"Secure Hash Standard",
FIPS PUB 180-3,
October 2008, <http://
csrc.nist.gov/
publications/fips/
fips180-3/fips180-3.pdf>.
[FIPS.186-3.2009] National Institute of
Standards and Technology,
"Digital Signature
Standard", FIPS PUB
186-3, June 2009, <http:/
/csrc.nist.gov/
Rose Expires August 26, 2010 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft IANA-Registry-Fix February 2010
publications/fips/
fips186-3/
fips_186-3.pdf>.
[RFC2536] Eastlake, D., "DSA KEYs
and SIGs in the Domain
Name System (DNS)",
RFC 2536, March 1999.
[RFC2539] Eastlake, D., "Storage of
Diffie-Hellman Keys in
the Domain Name System
(DNS)", RFC 2539,
March 1999.
[RFC3110] Eastlake, D., "RSA/SHA-1
SIGs and RSA KEYs in the
Domain Name System
(DNS)", RFC 3110,
May 2001.
[RFC4398] Josefsson, S., "Storing
Certificates in the
Domain Name System
(DNS)", RFC 4398,
March 2006.
[RFC5155] Laurie, B., Sisson, G.,
Arends, R., and D.
Blacka, "DNS Security
(DNSSEC) Hashed
Authenticated Denial of
Existence", RFC 5155,
March 2008.
[RFC5702] Jansen, J., "Use of SHA-2
Algorithms with RSA in
DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource
Records for DNSSEC",
RFC 5702, October 2009.
Rose Expires August 26, 2010 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft IANA-Registry-Fix February 2010
Author's Address
Scott Rose
NIST
100 Bureau Dr.
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
USA
Phone: +1-301-975-8439
EMail: scottr.nist@gmail.com
Rose Expires August 26, 2010 [Page 10]