DNS Extensions Working Group J. Schlyter
Internet-Draft August 2, 2004
Expires: January 31, 2005
RFC 3267 Interoperability Report
draft-ietf-dnsext-interop3597-00.txt
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable
patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed,
and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
RFC 3667.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://
www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 31, 2005.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This memo documents the result from the RFC 3267 (Handling of Unknown
DNS Resource Record Types) interoperability testing.
Schlyter Expires January 31, 2005 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft RFC 3267 Interoperability Report August 2004
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Implementations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1 Authoritative Primary Name Server . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2 Authoritative Secondary Name Server . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.3 Full Recursive Resolver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.4 Stub Resolver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.5 DNSSEC Signer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Problems found . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
A. Test zone data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . 6
Schlyter Expires January 31, 2005 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft RFC 3267 Interoperability Report August 2004
1. Introduction
This memo documents the result from the RFC 3267 (Handling of Unknown
DNS Resource Record Types) interoperability testing. The test was
performed during June and July 2004 by request of the IETF DNS
Extensions Working Group.
2. Implementations
The following is a list, in alphabetic order, of implementations for
compliance of RFC 3597:
DNSJava 1.6.4
ISC BIND 8.4.5rc4
ISC BIND 9.3.0rc2
NSD 2.1.1
Net::DNS 0.47 patchlevel 1
Nominum ANS 2.2.1.0.d
These implementations covers the following functions (number of
implementations tested for each function in paranthesis):
Authoritative Name Servers (4)
Full Recursive Resolver (2)
Stub Resolver (4)
DNSSEC Zone Signers (2)
3. Tests
3.1 Authoritative Primary Name Server
The test zone data (Appendix A) was loaded into the name server
implementation and the server was queried for the loaded information.
3.2 Authoritative Secondary Name Server
The test zone data (Appendix A) was transferred using AXFR from
another name server implementation and the server was queried for the
transferred information.
3.3 Full Recursive Resolver
A recursive resolver was queried for resource records from a domain
with the test zone data (Appendix A).
3.4 Stub Resolver
A stub resolver was used to query resource records from a domain with
Schlyter Expires January 31, 2005 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft RFC 3267 Interoperability Report August 2004
the test zone data (Appendix A).
3.5 DNSSEC Signer
A DNSSEC signer was used to sign a zone with test zone data (Appendix
A).
4. Problems found
Two implementations had problems with text presentation of zero
length RDATA.
One implementation had problems with text presentation of RR type
code and classes >= 4096.
Bug reports were filed for problems found.
5. Summary
Unknown type codes works in the tested authoritative servers,
recursive resolvers and stub clients.
No changes are needed to advance RFC 3597 to draft standard.
Normative References
[1] Gustafsson, A., "Handling of Unknown DNS Resource Record (RR)
Types", RFC 3597, September 2003.
Author's Address
Jakob Schlyter
EMail: jakob@rfc.se
Schlyter Expires January 31, 2005 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft RFC 3267 Interoperability Report August 2004
Appendix A. Test zone data
; A-record encoded as TYPE1
a TYPE1 \# 4 7f000001
a TYPE1 192.0.2.1
a A \# 4 7f000002
; draft-ietf-secsh-dns-05.txt
sshfp TYPE44 \# 22 01 01 c691e90714a1629d167de8e5ee0021f12a7eaa1e
; bogus test record (from RFC 3597)
type731 TYPE731 \# 6 abcd (
ef 01 23 45 )
; zero length RDATA (from RFC 3597)
type62347 TYPE62347 \# 0
Schlyter Expires January 31, 2005 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft RFC 3267 Interoperability Report August 2004
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in IETF Documents can
be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Schlyter Expires January 31, 2005 [Page 6]
