ENUM Working Group J. Livingood
Internet-Draft Comcast Cable Communications
Expires: April 26, 2007 P. Pfautz
AT&T
R. Stastny
Oefeg
October 2006
The E.164 to Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI)
Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Application for
Infrastructure ENUM
draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-01
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 26, 2007.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
Abstract
This document defines a parallel namespace ie164.arpa to
e164.arpa as defined in RFC3761 to be used for Infrastructure ENUM
purposes.
Livingood, et. al. Expires April 26, 2007 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Infrastructure ENUM October 2006
Table of Contents
1. Terminology....................................................2
2. Introduction...................................................2
3. IANA Considerations............................................3
4. DNS Root Selected for Infrastructure ENUM......................3
5. Security and Privacy Considerations............................3
6. Acknowledgements...............................................4
7. References.....................................................4
7.1 Normative References.......................................4
7.2 Informative References.....................................5
Authors' Addresses................................................5
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements....................5
1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC-2119.
2. Introduction
ENUM (E.164 Number Mapping, RFC 3761 [1]) is a system that transforms
E.164 numbers [2] into domain names and then uses the DNS (Domain
Name Service) [3] to discover NAPTR records that specify what
services are available for a specific domain name.
ENUM as originally defined was based on the end-user opt-in
principle. While this has great potential to foster new services and
end-user choice in the long-term, the current requirements for IP-
based interconnection of Voice over IP (VoIP) domains require the
provisioning of all allocated or served (hosted) numbers of a
participating service provider, without the need for individual users
to opt-in or not. This is particularly important if Infrastructure
ENUM is used for number portability applications, for example.
In addition, while it is possible that service providers could
mandate that their users opt-in into e164.arpa through end-user
contract terms and conditions, there are substantial downsides to
such an approach. Thus, for all these reasons and many others, ENUM
for end-user provisioning is ill-suited for use by service providers
for the interconnection of VoIP domains.
As VoIP evolves and becomes pervasive, E.164-addressed telephone
calls need not necessarily traverse the Public Switched Telephone
Network (PSTN). Therefore, VoIP service providers have an interest
Livingood, et. al. Expires April 26, 2006 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Infrastructure ENUM October 2006
in using ENUM, on a so-called "Infrastructure" basis, to keep VoIP
traffic on IP networks on an end-to-end basis, both within and
between service provider domains.
The requirements for Infrastructure ENUM are provided in an ENUM
Working Group document, Infrastructure ENUM Requirements [4]. This
document defines that Infrastructure ENUM be implemented by means of
a parallel namespace to e164.arpa dedicated to Infrastructure ENUM,
ie164.arpa.
Infrastructure ENUM Tier 2 resource records in the Infrastructure
ENUM tree would be controlled by the service provider that is
providing services to a given E.164 number, generally referred to in
various nations as the "carrier of record". The definition of who
controls a given E.164 number is a national matter or is defined by
the entity controlling the numbering space.
3. IANA Considerations
RFC 2916 [11] (which was replaced by RFC 3761) requested IANA to
delegate the e164.arpa domain following instructions to be provided
by the IAB. This document requests IANA delegate ie164.arpa for
Infrastructure ENUM. Names within this zone are to be delegated to
parties according to the International Telecommunications Union's
(ITU) Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) Recommendation
E.164. The names allocated should be hierarchic in accordance with
ITU-T Recommendation E.164, and the codes should be assigned in
accordance with that Recommendation.
The IAB is to coordinate with ITU-T Telecommunication Standardization
Bureau (TSB) if the technical contact for the domain ie164.arpa is to
change, as ITU-T TSB has an operational working relationship with
this technical contact which needs to be reestablished. Delegations
in the zone ie164.arpa (not delegations in delegated domains of
ie164.arpa) should be done after Expert Review, and the IESG will
appoint a designated expert.
IANA has created a registry for Enumservices as originally specified
in RFC 2916 and revised in RFC 3761. Enumservices registered with
IANA are valid for Infrastructure ENUM as well as end-user ENUM.
4. DNS Root Selected for Infrastructure ENUM
The DNS root is ie164.arpa.
5. Security and Privacy Considerations
Livingood, et. al. Expires April 26, 2006 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Infrastructure ENUM October 2006
Since Infrastructure ENUM is also implemented on the public Internet,
the same security considerations apply as noted in RFC 3761.
In addition, since there is no opt-in for end-users, personally-
identifiable information (PII) must not be disclosed for any end-
user.
Thus, the information provided in the NAPTR records must not disclose
any PII about the end-user such as a name in user-info. This can be
achieved, for example, by entering the information in the format
sip:<e164_phone_number>@provider.example,
mailto:<e164_phone_number>@provider.example or sip:<opaque
string>@provider.example.
6. Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Lawrence Conroy, Patrik Faltstrom, Michael
Haberler, Steve Lind, Alexander Mayrhofer, and Richard Shockey for
their helpful discussion of this draft and the concept of
Infrastructure ENUM.
7. References
7.1 Normative References
[1] Faltstrom, P. and M. Mealling, "The E.164 to Uniform Resource
Identifiers (URI) Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS)
Application (ENUM)", RFC 3761, April 2004.
[2] ITU-T, "The International Public Telecommunication Number Plan",
Recommendation E.164, May 1997.
[3] Mockapetris, P., "DOMAIN NAMES - CONCEPTS AND FACILITIES", RFC
1034, November 1987.
[4] Lind, S., Pfautz, P., "Infrastructure ENUM Requirements", draft-
enum-infrastructure-requirements-01, March 2006. (work-in-progress)
[5] Mealling, M., "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part
Three: The Domain Name System (DNS) Database", RFC 3403, October
2002.
[6] Mealling, M., "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part
One: The Comprehensive DDDS", RFC 3401, October 2002.
[7] Mealling, M., "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part
Two: The Algorithm", RFC 3402, October 2002.
Livingood, et. al. Expires April 26, 2006 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Infrastructure ENUM October 2006
[8] Mealling, M., "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part
Four: The Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI)", RFC 3404, October
2002.
[9] Mealling, M., "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part
Five: URI.ARPA Assignment Procedures", RFC 3405, October 2002.
[10] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", RFC 2119, March 1997.
[11] Faltstrom, P., "E.164 number and DNS", RFC 2916, September 2000.
7.2 Informative References
Authors' Addresses
Jason Livingood
Comcast Cable Communications
1500 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102
USA
Phone: +1-215-981-7813
Email: jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com
Penn Pfautz
AT&T
200 S. Laurel Ave
Middletown, NJ 07748
USA
Phone: +1-732-420-4962
Email: ppfautz@att.com
Richard Stastny
Oefeg
Postbox 147
1103 Vienna
Austria
Phone: +43-664-420-4100
Email: Richard.stastny@oefeg.at
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements
Livingood, et. al. Expires April 26, 2006 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Infrastructure ENUM October 2006
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Livingood, et. al. Expires April 26, 2006 [Page 6]
