[Search] [txt|pdf|bibtex] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03                                                   
Network Working Group                                          M. Duerst
Internet-Draft                                       W3C/Keio University
Expires: December 30, 2002                                  July 1, 2002


                  Internationalized Domain Names in URIs
                          draft-ietf-idn-uri-02

Status of this Memo

    This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
    all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.

    Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
    Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
    other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
    Drafts.

    Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
    and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
    time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
    material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

    The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://
    www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

    The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
    http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

    This Internet-Draft will expire on December 30, 2002.

Copyright Notice

    Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

    This document proposes to upgrade the definition of URIs (RFC 2396)
    [RFC2396] to work consistently with internationalized domain names.













Duerst                  Expires December 30, 2002               [Page 1]


Internet-Draft                IDNs in URIs                     July 2002


Table of Contents

    1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    2.  URI syntax changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    3.  Security considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
    4.  Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
    4.1 Changes from draft-ietf-idn-uri--01 to draft-ietf-idn-uri-02 .  5
    4.2 Changes from draft-ietf-idn-uri--00 to draft-ietf-idn-uri-01 .  5
        References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
        Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
        Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8








































Duerst                  Expires December 30, 2002               [Page 2]


Internet-Draft                IDNs in URIs                     July 2002


1. Introduction

    Internet domain names serve to identify hosts and services on the
    Internet in a convenient way.  The IETF IDN working group [IDNWG] has
    been working on extending the character repertoire usable in domain
    names beyond a subset of US-ASCII.

    One of the most important places where domain names appear are
    Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs, [RFC2396], as modified by
    [RFC2732]).  However, in the current definition of the generic URI
    syntax, the restrictions on domain names are 'hard-coded'.  In
    Section 2, this document relaxes these restrictions by updating the
    syntax, and defines how internationalized domain names are encoded in
    URIs.

    The syntax in this document has been choosen to further increase the
    uniformity of URI syntax, which is a very important principle of
    URIs.

    In practice, escaped domanin names should be used as rarely as
    possible.  Wherever possible, the actual characters in
    Internationalized Domain Names should be preserved as long as
    possible by using IRIs [IRI] rather than URIs, and only converting to
    URIs and then to ACE-encoded [IDNA] domain names (or ideally directly
    to ACE-encoding without even using URIs) when resolving the IRI.
    Also, this document does in no way exclude the use of ACE encoding
    directly in an URI domain name part.  ACE encoding may be used
    directly in an URI domain name part if this is considered necessary
    for interoperability.

    Please note that even with the definition of URIs in [RFC2396], some
    URIs can already contain host names with escaped characters.  For
    example, mailto:example@w%33.org is legal per [RFC2396] because the
    mailto: URI scheme does not follow the generic syntax of [RFC2396].

2. URI syntax changes

    The syntax of URIs [RFC2396] currently contains the following rules
    relevant to domain names:

           hostname      = *( domainlabel "." ) toplabel [ "." ]
           domainlabel   = alphanum | alphanum *( alphanum | "-" ) alphanum
           toplabel      = alpha | alpha *( alphanum | "-" ) alphanum








Duerst                  Expires December 30, 2002               [Page 3]


Internet-Draft                IDNs in URIs                     July 2002


    The later two rules are changed as follows:

           domainlabel   = anchar | anchar *( anchar | "-" ) anchar
           toplabel      = achar | achar *( anchar | "-" ) anchar

    and the following rules are added:

                 anchar        = alphanum | escaped
                 achar         = alpha | escaped

    Characters outside the repertoire (alphanum) are encoded by first
    encoding the characters in UTF-8 [RFC 2279], resulting in a sequence
    of octets, and then escaping these octets according to the rules
    defined in [RFC2396].

    Using UTF-8 assures that this encoding interoperates with IRIs [IRI].
    It is also aligned with the recommendations in [RFC2277] and
    [RFC2718], and is consistent with the URN syntax [RFC2141] as well as
    recent URL scheme definitions that define encodings of non-ASCII
    characters based on UTF-8 (e.g., IMAP URLs [RFC2192] and POP URLs
    [RFC2384]).

    The above syntax rules permit for domain names that are neither
    permitted as US-ASCII only domain names nor as internationalized
    domain names.  However, such syntax should never be used, and will
    always be rejected by resolvers.  For US-ASCII only domain names, the
    syntax rules in [RFC2396] are relevant.  For example, http://
    www.w%33.org is legal, because the corresponding 'w3' is a legal
    'domainlabel' according to [RFC2396].  However, http://
    %2a.example.org is illegal because the corresponding '*' is not a
    legal 'domainlabel' according to [RFC2396].  For domain names
    containing non-ASCII characters, the legal domain names are those for
    which the ToASCII operation ([IDNA], [Nameprep]; using the unescaped
    UTF-8 values as input) is successful.

    For consistency in comparison operations and for interoperability
    with older software, the following should be noted: 1) US-ASCII
    characters in domain names should not be escaped.  2) Because of the
    principle of syntax uniformity for URIs, it is always more prudent to
    take into account the possibility that US-ASCII characters are
    escaped.

    The work of the IDN WG includes some procedures for name preparation
    [Nameprep].  Before encoding an internationalized domain name in an
    URI, this preparation step SHOULD be applied.  However, the URI
    resolver MUST also apply any steps required as part of domain name
    resolution by [IDNA].




Duerst                  Expires December 30, 2002               [Page 4]


Internet-Draft                IDNs in URIs                     July 2002


3. Security considerations

    The security considerations of [RFC2396] and those applying to
    internationalized domain names apply.  There may be an increased
    potential to smuggle escaped US-ASCII-based domain names across
    firewalls, although because of the uniform syntax principle for URIs,
    such a potential is already existing.

4. Change Log

4.1 Changes from draft-ietf-idn-uri--01 to draft-ietf-idn-uri-02

    Moved change log to back

    Changed to only change URIs; IRI syntax updated directly in IRI
    draft.

    Removed syntax restriction on %hh in the US-ASCII part, but made
    clear that restrictions to domain names apply.

    Made clear that escaped domain names in URIs should only be an
    intermediate representation.

    Gave example of mailto: as already allowing escaped host names.

4.2 Changes from draft-ietf-idn-uri--00 to draft-ietf-idn-uri-01

    Changed requirement for URI/IRI resolvers from MUST to SHOULD

    Changed IRI syntax slightly (ichar -> idchar, based on changes in
    [IRI])

    Various wording changes

References

    [IDNA]      Faltstrom, P., Hoffman, P. and A. Costello,
                "Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications (IDNA)",
                draft-ietf-idn-idna-09.txt (work in progress), May 2002,
                <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idn-idna-
                09.txt>.

    [IDNWG]     "IETF Internationalized Domain Name (idn) Working Group".

    [IRI]       Duerst, M. and M. Suignard, "Internationalized Resource
                Identifiers (IRI)", draft-duerst-iri-01 (work in
                progress), July 2002.




Duerst                  Expires December 30, 2002               [Page 5]


Internet-Draft                IDNs in URIs                     July 2002


    [ISO10646]  International Organization for Standardization,
                "Information Technology - Universal Multiple-Octet Coded
                Character Set (UCS) - Part 1: Architecture and Basic
                Multilingual Plane", ISO Standard 10646-1, October 2000.

    [Nameprep]  Hoffman, P. and M. Blanchet, "Nameprep: A Stringprep
                Profile for Internationalized Domain Names", draft-ietf-
                idn-nameprep-10.txt (work in progress), May 2002, <http:/
                /www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idn-nameprep-
                10.txt>.

    [RFC2119]   Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
                Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

    [RFC2141]   Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997.

    [RFC2192]   Newman, C., "IMAP URL Scheme", RFC 2192, September 1997.

    [RFC2277]   Alvestrand, H., "IETF Policy on Character Sets and
                Languages", BCP 18, RFC 2277, January 1998.

    [RFC2279]   Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
                10646", RFC 2279, January 1998.

    [RFC2384]   Gellens, R., "POP URL Scheme", RFC 2384, August 1998.

    [RFC2396]   Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform
                Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396,
                August 1998.

    [RFC2640]   Curtin, B., "Internationalization of the File Transfer
                Protocol", RFC 2640, July 1999.

    [RFC2718]   Masinter, L., Alvestrand, H., Zigmond, D. and R. Petke,
                "Guidelines for new URL Schemes", RFC 2718, November
                1999.

    [RFC2732]   Hinden, R., Carpenter, B. and L. Masinter, "Format for
                Literal IPv6 Addresses in URL's", RFC 2732, December
                1999.











Duerst                  Expires December 30, 2002               [Page 6]


Internet-Draft                IDNs in URIs                     July 2002


Author's Address

    Martin Duerst
    W3C/Keio University
    5322 Endo
    Fujisawa  252-8520
    Japan

    Phone: +81 466 49 1170
    Fax:   +81 466 49 1171
    EMail: duerst@w3.org
    URI:   http://www.w3.org/People/D%C3%BCrst/







































Duerst                  Expires December 30, 2002               [Page 7]


Internet-Draft                IDNs in URIs                     July 2002


Full Copyright Statement

    Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.

    This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
    others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
    or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
    and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
    kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
    included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
    document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
    the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
    Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
    developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
    copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
    followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
    English.

    The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
    revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

    This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
    "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
    TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
    BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
    HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
    MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

    Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
    Internet Society.



















Duerst                  Expires December 30, 2002               [Page 8]