IDR Working Group W,. Hao
Internet-Draft D. Eastlake
Intended status: Standards Track S. Hares
Expires: September 21, 2016 Huawei Technologies
B. Pithawala
IP Infusion
M. Durrani
Cisco Systems
Y. Li
Huawei Technologies
March 20, 2016
Distribution of TRILL Link-State using BGP
draft-ietf-idr-ls-trill-01.txt
Abstract
This draft describes a TRILL link state and MAC address reachability
information distribution mechanism using a BGP LS extension.
External components such as an SDN Controller can use the information
for topology visibility, troubleshooting, network automation, etc.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 21, 2016.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft BGP LS for TRILL March 2016
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Carrying Trill Link-State Information in BGP . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Node Descriptors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1.1. IGP Router-ID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2. MAC Address Descriptors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2.1. MAC-Reachability TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3. BGP-LS attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3.1. Node Attribute TLVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3.2. Link Attribute TLVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4. Operational Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
8. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1. Introduction
BGP has been extended to distribute IGP link-state and traffic
engineering information to some external components [RFC7752] such as
the PCE and ALTO servers. The information can be used by these
external components to compute a MPLS-TE path across IGP areas,
visualize and abstract network topology, and the like.
TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links) protocol
[RFC6325] provides a solution for least cost transparent routing in
multi-hop networks with arbitrary topologies and link technologies,
using [IS-IS] [RFC7176] link-state routing and a hop count. TRILL
switches are sometimes called RBridges (Routing Bridges).
The TRILL protocol has been deployed in many data center networks.
Data center automation is a vital step to increase the speed and
agility of business. An SDN controller as an external component
normally can be used to provide centralized control and automation
for the data center network. Making a holistic view of whole network
topology available to the SDN controller is an important part for
data center network automation and troubleshooting.
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft BGP LS for TRILL March 2016
+-------------+
| SDN |
--------| Controller |--------
| +-------------+ |
| |
+ + + +
+ +-----------+ +
| |
+--------+ |IP Network | +--------+
| | +----+ +----+ | |
+---+ +---+ | | | | | | | | +---+ +---+
|ES1|-|RB1|-| Area 1 |-|BRB1| |BRB2|-| Area 2 |-|RB2|-|ES2|
+---+ +---+ | | +----+ +----+ | | +---+ +---+
| | | | | |
+--------+ +-----------+ +--------+
|<----TRILL ------>|<IP tunnel>|<-----TRILL ----->|
Figure 1: TRILL interconnection
In Data Center interconnection scenario illustrated in figure 1, a
single SDN Controller or network management system (NMS) can be used
for end-to-end network management. End-to-end topology visibility on
the SDN controller or NMS is very useful for whole network automation
and troubleshooting. BGP LS can be used by the external SDN
controller to collect multiple TRILL domain's link-state.
If ESADI (End Station Address Distribution Information) protocol
[RFC7357] is used for control plane MAC learning in each data center,
BGP LS also can be used for MAC address reachability information
synchronization across multiple TRILL domains. End-to-end unicast
forwarding paths can be calculated based on the synchronized
information.
This document describes the detailed BGP LS extension mechanisms for
TRILL link state and MAC address reachability information
distribution.
2. Conventions used in this document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]
BGP - Border Gateway Protocol
BGP-LS - BGP Link-State
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft BGP LS for TRILL March 2016
Data label - VLAN or FGL (Fine Grained Label) [RFC7172]
IS - Intermediate System (for this document, all relevant
intermediate systems are RBridges).
NLRI - Network Layer Reachability Information
SDN - Software Defined Networking
RBridge - A device implementing the TRILL protocol
TRILL - Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links
3. Carrying Trill Link-State Information in BGP
In [RFC7752], four NLRI types are defined as follows: Node NLRI, Link
NLRI, IPv4 Topology Prefix NLRI and IPv6 Topology Prefix NLRI. For
TRILL link-state distribution, the Node NLRI and Link NLRI are
extended to carry layer 3 gateway role and link MTU information.
TRILL specific attributes are carried using opaque Node Attribute
TLVs, such as nickname, distribution tree number and identifiers,
interested VLANs/Fine Grained Label, and multicast group address, and
etc.
To differentiate TRILL protocol from layer 3 IGP protocol, a new
TRILL Protocol-ID is defined.
+-------------+----------------------------------+
| Protocol-ID | NLRI information source protocol |
+-------------+----------------------------------+
| 1 | IS-IS Level 1 |
| 2 | IS-IS Level 2 |
| 3 | OSPFv2 |
| 4 | Direct |
| 5 | Static configuration |
| 6 | OSPFv3 |
| TBD | TRILL |
+-------------+----------------------------------+
Table 1: Protocol Identifiers
ESADI (End Station Address Distribution Information) protocol
[RFC7357] is a per data label control plane MAC learning solution.
MAC address reachability information is carried in ESADI packets.
Compared with data plane MAC learning solution, ESADI protocol has
security and fast update advantage that are pointed out in [RFC7357].
For an RBridge that is announcing participation in ESADI, the RBridge
can distribute MAC address reachability information to external
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft BGP LS for TRILL March 2016
components using BGP. A new NLRI type of ''MAC Reachability NLRI''
is requested for the MAC address reachability distribution.
+------+---------------------------+
| Type | NLRI Type |
+------+---------------------------+
| 1 | Node NLRI |
| 2 | Link NLRI |
| 3 | IPv4 Topology Prefix NLRI |
| 4 | IPv6 Topology Prefix NLRI |
| TBD | MAC Reachability NLRI |
+------+---------------------------+
Table 2: NLRI Types
The MAC Reachability NLRI uses the format as shown in the following
figure.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Protocol-ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Identifier |
| (64 bits) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
// Local Node Descriptor (variable) //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
// MAC Address Descriptors (variable) //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 2: The MAC Reachability NLRI format
3.1. Node Descriptors
The Node Descriptor Sub-TLV types include Autonomous System and BGP-
LS Identifier, iS-IS Area-ID and IGP Router-ID. TRILL uses a fixed
zero Area Address as specified in [RFC6325], Section 4.2.3. This is
encoded in a 4-byte Area Address TLV (TLV #1) as follows:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x01, Area Address Type | (1 byte)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x02, Length of Value | (1 byte)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x01, Length of Address | (1 byte)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x00, zero Area Address | (1 byte)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 3: Area Address TLV
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft BGP LS for TRILL March 2016
3.1.1. IGP Router-ID
Similar to layer 3 IS-IS, TRILL protocol uses 7-octet "IS-IS ID" as
the identity of an RBridge or a pseudonode, IGP Router ID sub-TLV in
Node Descriptor TLVs contains the 7-octet "IS-IS ID". In TRILL
network, each RBridge has a unique 48-bit (6-octet) IS-IS System ID.
This ID may be derived from any of the RBridge's unique MAC addresses
or configured. A pseudonode is assigned a 7-octet ID by the DRB
(Designated RBridge) that created it, the DRB is similar to the
"Designated Intermediate System" (DIS) corresponding to a LAN.
3.2. MAC Address Descriptors
The ''MAC Address Descriptor'' field is a set of Type/Length/Value
(TLV) triplets. ''MAC Address Descriptor'' TLVs uniquely identify an
MAC address reachable by a Node. The following attributes TLVs are
defined:
+--------------+-----------------------+----------+-----------------+
| TLV Code | Description | Length | Value defined |
| Point | | | in: |
+--------------+-----------------------+----------+-----------------+
| 1 | MAC-Reachability | variable | section 3.2.1 |
+--------------+-----------------------+----------+-----------------+
Table 3: MAC Address Descriptor TLVs
3.2.1. MAC-Reachability TLV
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type= MAC-RI | (1 byte)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Length | (1 byte)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|V|F| RESV | Data Label | (4 bytes)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| MAC (1) (6 bytes) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ................. |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| MAC (N) (6 bytes) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 4: MAC-Reachability TLV format
Length is 4 plus a multiple of 6.
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft BGP LS for TRILL March 2016
The bits of 'V' and 'F' are used to identify Data Label type and are
defined as follows:
+----------+-------------------------+
| Bit | Description |
+----------+-------------------------+
| 'V' | VLAN |
| 'F' | Fine Grained Label |
+----------+-------------------------+
Table 4: Data Label Type Bits Definitions
Notes: If BGP LS is used for NVO3 network MAC address distribution
between external SDN Controller and NVE, Data Label can be used to
represent 24 bits VN ID.
3.3. BGP-LS attribute
3.3.1. Node Attribute TLVs
3.3.1.1. Node Flag Bits TLV
A new Node Flag bit is added as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|O|T|E|B|G| Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 5: Node Flag Bits TLV format
The new bit and remaining reserved bits are defined as follows:
+----------+----------------------------+-----------+
| Bit | Description | Reference |
+----------+----------------------------+-----------+
| 'G' | Layer 3 Gateway Bit | [RFC7176] |
| Reserved | Reserved for future use | |
+----------+----------------------------+-----------+
Table 5: Node Flag Bits Definitions
3.3.1.2. Opaque Node Attribute TLV
The Opaque Node Attribute TLV is used as the envelope to
transparently carry TRILL specific information. In [RFC7176], there
are the following Sub-TLVs in the Router Capability and MT-
Capability TLVs and the Group Address (GADDR) TLV that need to be
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft BGP LS for TRILL March 2016
carried. Future possible TRILL TLVs/Sub-TLVs extension also can be
carried using the Opaque Node Attribute TLV.
Descriptions IS-IS TLV/Sub-TLV
------------------------------------
TRILL-VER 22/13
NICKNAME 22/6
TREES 22/7
TREE-RT-IDs 22/8
TREE-USE-IDs 22/9
INT-VLAN 22/10
VLAN-GROUP 22/14
INT-LABEL 22/15
RBCHANNELS 22/16
AFFINITY 22/17
LABEL-GROUP 22/18
GMAC-ADDR 142/1
GIP-ADDR 142/2
GIPV6-ADDR 142/3
GLMAC-ADDR 142/4
GLIP-ADDR 142/5
GLIPV6-ADDR 142/6
Table 6: TRILL TLVs/Sub-TLVs
3.3.2. Link Attribute TLVs
Link attribute TLVs are TLVs that may be encoded in the BGP-LS
attribute with a link NLRI. Besides the TLVs that has been defined
in [RFC7752] section 3.3.2 table 9, the following 'Link Attribute'
TLV is provided for TRILL.
+-----------+----------------+--------------+------------------+
| TLV Code | Description | IS-IS TLV | Defined in: |
| Point | | /Sub-TLV | |
+-----------+----------------+--------------+------------------+
| TBD | Link MTU | 22/28 | [RFC7176]/2.4 |
+-----------+----------------+--------------+------------------+
Table 7: Link Attribute TLVs
4. Operational Considerations
This document does not require any MIB or Yang model to configure
operational parameters.
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft BGP LS for TRILL March 2016
An implementation of this specification[idr-ls-trill], MUST do the
malformed attribute checks below, and if it detects a malformed
attribute, it should use the 'Attribute Discard' action per [RFC7606]
section 2.
An implementation MUST perform the following expanded [BGP-LS]
syntactic check for determining if the message is malformed:
o Does the sum of all TLVs found in the BGP LS attribute correspond
to the BGP LS path attribute length ?
o Does the sum of all TLVs found in the BGP MP_REACH_NLRI attribute
correspond to the BGP MP_REACH_NLRI length ?
o Does the sum of all TLVs found in the BGP MP_UNREACH_NLRI
attribute correspond to the BGP MP_UNREACH_NLRI length ?
o Does the sum of all TLVs found in a Node-, Link, prefix (IPv4 or
IPv6) NLRI attribute correspond to the Node-, Link- or Prefix
Descriptors 'Total NLRI Length' field ?
o Does any fixed length TLV correspond to the TLV Length field in
this document ?
o Does the sum of MAC reachability TLVs equal the length of the
field?
In addition, the following checks need to be made for the fields
specific to the BGP LS for TRILL:
o PROTOCOL ID is TRILL,
o NLRI types are valid per table 2,
o MAC Reachability NLRI has correct format including:
* Identifier (64 bits),
* local node descriptor with AREA address TLV has the form found
in figure 2,
o opaque TLV support the range of ISIS-TLV/SUB-TLV shown in table 3,
and link TLVs support the range in figure 8.
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft BGP LS for TRILL March 2016
5. Security Considerations
Procedures and protocol extensions defined in this document do not
affect the BGP security model. See [RFC6952] for details.
6. IANA Considerations
This section complies with [RFC7153]. For all of the following
assignments, [this document] is the reference.
IANA is requested to requested to assign one Protocol-ID for "TRILL"
from the BGP-LS registry of Protocol-IDs
IANA is requested to assign one NLRI Type for "MAC Reachability" from
the BGP-LS registry of NLRI Types.
IANA is requested to assign one Node Flag bit for "Layer 3 Gateway"
from the BGP-LS registry of BGP-LS Attribute TLVs.
IANA is requested to assign one new TLV type for "Link MTU" from the
BGP-LS registry of BGP-LS Attribute TLVs.
7. Acknowledgements
Authors like to thank Andrew Qu, Jie Dong, Mingui Zhang, Qin Wu,
Shunwan Zhuang, Zitao Wang, Lili Wang for their valuable inputs.
8. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A
Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.
[RFC6325] Perlman, R., Eastlake 3rd, D., Dutt, D., Gai, S., and A.
Ghanwani, "Routing Bridges (RBridges): Base Protocol
Specification", RFC 6325, DOI 10.17487/RFC6325, July 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6325>.
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft BGP LS for TRILL March 2016
[RFC6952] Jethanandani, M., Patel, K., and L. Zheng, "Analysis of
BGP, LDP, PCEP, and MSDP Issues According to the Keying
and Authentication for Routing Protocols (KARP) Design
Guide", RFC 6952, DOI 10.17487/RFC6952, May 2013,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6952>.
[RFC7153] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "IANA Registries for BGP
Extended Communities", RFC 7153, DOI 10.17487/RFC7153,
March 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7153>.
[RFC7172] Eastlake 3rd, D., Zhang, M., Agarwal, P., Perlman, R., and
D. Dutt, "Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links
(TRILL): Fine-Grained Labeling", RFC 7172,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7172, May 2014,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7172>.
[RFC7176] Eastlake 3rd, D., Senevirathne, T., Ghanwani, A., Dutt,
D., and A. Banerjee, "Transparent Interconnection of Lots
of Links (TRILL) Use of IS-IS", RFC 7176,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7176, May 2014,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7176>.
[RFC7357] Zhai, H., Hu, F., Perlman, R., Eastlake 3rd, D., and O.
Stokes, "Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links
(TRILL): End Station Address Distribution Information
(ESADI) Protocol", RFC 7357, DOI 10.17487/RFC7357,
September 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7357>.
[RFC7606] Chen, E., Ed., Scudder, J., Ed., Mohapatra, P., and K.
Patel, "Revised Error Handling for BGP UPDATE Messages",
RFC 7606, DOI 10.17487/RFC7606, August 2015,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7606>.
[RFC7752] Gredler, H., Ed., Medved, J., Previdi, S., Farrel, A., and
S. Ray, "North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and
Traffic Engineering (TE) Information Using BGP", RFC 7752,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7752, March 2016,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7752>.
Authors' Addresses
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft BGP LS for TRILL March 2016
Weiquo Hao
Huawei Technologies
101 Software Avenue,
Nanjing 210012
China
Phone: +86-25-56623144
Email: haoweiguo@huawei.com
Donald E. Eastlake
Huawei Technologies
155 Beaver Street
Milford , MA 01757
USA
Phone: +1-508-333-2270
Email: d3e3e3@gmail.com
Susan Hares
Huawei Technologies
7453 Hickory
Saline , MI 48176
USA
Phone: +1-734-604-0332
Email: shares@ndzh.com
Sujay Gupta
IP Infusion
Email: sujay.gupta@ipinfusion.com
Muhammad Durrani
Cisco Systems
Phone: +1-408-527-6921
Email: mdurrani@cisco.com
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft BGP LS for TRILL March 2016
Yizhou Li
Huawei Technologies
101 Software Avenue,
Nanjing 210012
China
Email: liyizhou@huawei.com
Hao, et al. Expires September 21, 2016 [Page 13]
