IP Storage Working Group Prasenjit Sarkar
Internet Draft IBM
Document: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-boot-12.txt Duncan Missimer
Category: Standards Track Brocade
Constantin Sapuntzakis
Stanford University
18 March 2004
Bootstrapping Clients using the iSCSI Protocol
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or made obsolete by other documents at
any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list
of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of Internet-Draft
Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
The words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY" and "OPTIONAL" in this
documents are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
Abstract
iSCSI is a proposed transport protocol for SCSI that operates on top
of TCP. This memo describes a standard mechanism to enable clients
to bootstrap themselves using the iSCSI protocol. The goal of this
standard is to enable iSCSI boot clients to obtain the information to
open an iSCSI session with the iSCSI boot server.
1. Introduction
The Small Computer Systems Interface (SCSI) is a popular family of
protocols for communicating with I/O devices, especially storage
devices. SCSI can be characterized as a request/response messaging
protocol with a standard architecture and componentized command sets
for different device classes.
Sarkar Expires: August 2004 [Page 1]
Standards Track iSCSI BootStrapping Draft 18 March 2004
iSCSI is a proposed transport protocol for SCSI that operates on top
of TCP. The role of iSCSI is necessitated by the evolution of the
system interconnect from a shared bus to a switched network. IP
networks meet the architectural and performance requirements of
transporting SCSI, paving the way for the iSCSI protocol.
Many diskless clients sometimes bootstrap off remote SCSI devices.
Such diskless entities are lightweight, space-efficient and power-
conserving, and are increasingly popular in various environments.
This memo describes a standard mechanism to enable clients to
bootstrap themselves using the iSCSI protocol. The goal of this
standard is to enable iSCSI boot clients to obtain the information to
open an iSCSI session with the iSCSI boot server. It is possible that
all the information is not available at the very outset, so the memo
describes steps to obtain the information required to bootstrap
clients off an iSCSI boot server.
2. Requirements
1. There must be no restriction of network topology between the iSCSI
boot client and the boot server other than those in effect for
establishing the iSCSI session. Consequently, it is possible for an
iSCSI boot client to boot from an iSCSI boot server behind gateways
or firewalls as long as it is possible to establish an iSCSI session
between the client and the server.
2. The following represents the minimum information required for an
iSCSI boot client to contact an iSCSI boot server: (a) the client's
IP address (IPv6 or IPv4); (b) the server's iSCSI Target Name; and
(c) mandatory iSCSI initiator capability.
The above assumes that the default LUN for the boot process is 0 and
the default port for the iSCSI boot server is the well-known iSCSI
port [Satran02]. However, both may be overridden at the time of
configuration.
Additional information may be required at each stage of the boot
process.
3. It is possible for the iSCSI boot client to have none of the above
information or capability on starting.
4. The client should be able to complete boot without user
intervention (for boots that occur during an unattended power-up).
However, there should be a mechanism for the user to input values so
as to bypass stages of the boot protocol.
Sarkar Expires: August 2004 [Page 2]
Standards Track iSCSI BootStrapping Draft 18 March 2004
5. Additional protocol software (for example, BOOTP or DHCP) may be
necessary if the minimum information required for an iSCSI session is
not provided.
3. Related Work
The Reverse Address Resolution Protocol (RARP) [Finlayson84] through
the extensions defined in the Dynamic RARP (DRARP)) [Brownell96]
explicitly addresses the problem of network address discovery, and
includes an automatic IP address assignment mechanism. The Trivial
File Transfer Protocol (TFTP) [Sollins81] provides for transport of a
boot image from a boot server. BOOTP [Croft85, Reynolds93, Wimer93]
is a transport mechanism for a collection of configuration
information. BOOTP is also extensible, and official extensions have
been defined for several configuration parameters. DHCPv4 [Droms97,
Droms93] and DHCPv6 [Droms02] are standards for hosts to be
dynamically configured in an IP network. The Service Location
Protocol (SLP) provides for location of higher level services
[Guttman99].
4. Software stage
Some iSCSI boot clients may lack the resources to boot up with the
mandatory iSCSI initiator capability. Such boot clients may choose to
obtain iSCSI initiator software from a boot server. Currently, there
are many established protocols that allow such a service to enable
clients to load software images. For example, BOOTP and DHCP servers
have the capability to provide the locations of servers that can
serve software images on requests from boot clients.
It is to be noted that this document does not recommend any of the
above protocols, and the final decision of which boot protocol is to
be used to load iSCSI initiator software is left to the discretion of
the implementor.
5. DHCP stage
In order to use an iSCSI boot server, the following pieces of
information are required for an ISCSI boot client.
- The IP address of the iSCSI boot client (IPv4 or IPv6)
- The IP transport endpoint for the iSCSI Target Port for the iSCSI
boot server. If the transport is TCP, for example, this has to
resolve to an IP address and a TCP port number. TCP is currently the
only transport approved for iSCSI.
Sarkar Expires: August 2004 [Page 3]
Standards Track iSCSI BootStrapping Draft 18 March 2004
- The eight-byte LUN structure identifying the Logical Unit within
the iSCSI boot server.
At boot time, all or none of this information may be stored in the
iSCSI boot client. This section describes techniques for obtaining
the required information via the DHCP stage. Otherwise, if the iSCSI
boot client has all the information, the boot client may proceed
directly to the Boot stage.
An iSCSI boot client which does not know its IP address at power-on
may acquire its IP address via BOOTP or DHCP (v4 or v6). Please note
that DHCP settings (such as the RA settings in DHCPv6) may prohibit
the use of DHCP in distributing iSCSI boot information -- in this
case, the DHCP stage cannot be used.
Unless otherwise specified here, BOOTP or DHCP fields such as the
client ID and gateway information are used in an identical way as
applications other than iSCSI do.
A BOOTP or DHCP server (v4 or v6) MAY instruct an iSCSI client how to
reach its boot device. This is done using the variable length option
named Root Path. The use of the option field is reserved for iSCSI
boot use by prefacing the string with "iscsi:". The Root Path option
is not currently defined for DHCPv6; if the option is defined for
DHCPv6 in the future, the use of the option as defined for iSCSI boot
will apply.
The option field consists of an UTF-8 [Yergeau98] string. The string
has the following composition:
"iscsi:"<servername>":"<protocol>":"<port>":"<LUN>":"<targetname>
The fields "servername", "port", "protocol" and "LUN" are OPTIONAL
and should be left blank if there are no corresponding values. The
"targetname" field is not optional and MUST be provided.
The "servername" is the name of iSCSI server and contains either a
valid domain name, a literal IPv4 address, or a literal IPv6 address.
The servername must follow the specifications outlined in Section
3.2.2 of the URI Specification[Lee04]. The characters allowed must
also conform to Section 2.2 of the same specification. Servername
compression MUST NOT be used in this field.
The "protocol" field is the decimal representation of the IANA-
approved string for the trasport protocol to be used for iSCSI. If
the protocol field is left bank, the default value is assumed to be
"6" for TCP. The transport protocol MUST have been approved for use
in iSCSI; currently, the only approved protocol is TCP.
Sarkar Expires: August 2004 [Page 4]
Standards Track iSCSI BootStrapping Draft 18 March 2004
The "port" is the decimal representation of the port on which the
iSCSI boot server is listening. If not specified, the port defaults
to the well-known iSCSI port [Satran02].
The "LUN" field is a hexadecimal representation of the LU number. If
the LUN field is blank, then LUN 0 is assumed. If the LUN field is
not blank, the representation MUST be divided into four groups of
four hexadecimal digits, separated by "-". Digits above 9 may be
either lower or upper case. An example of such a representation
would be 4752-3A4F-6b7e-2F99. For the sake of brevity, at most three
leading zero ("0") digits MAY be omitted in any group of hexadecimal
digits. Thus, the "LUN" representation 6734-9-156f-127 is equivalent
to 6734-0009-156f-0127. Furthermore, trailing groups containing only
the "0" digit MAY be omitted along with the preceding "-". So, the
"LUN" representation 4186-9 is equivalent to 4186-0009-0000-0000.
Other concise representations of the LUN field MUST NOT be used.
Note that SCSI targets are allowed to present different LU numberings
for different SCSI initiators, so that to our knowledge nothing
precludes a SCSI target from exporting several different LUs to
several different SCSI initiators as their respective LUN 0s.
The "targetname" field is an iSCSI Name that is defined by the iSCSI
standard [Satran02] to uniquely identify an iSCSI target. The
approved characters in the targetname field are stated in the iSCSI
String Profile document[Bakke04].
If the "servername" field is provided by BOOTP or DHCP, then that
field is used in conjunction with other associated fields to contact
the boot server in the Boot stage (Section 7). However, if the
"servername" field is not provided, then the "targetname" field is
then used in the Discovery Service stage in conjunction with other
associated fields. (Section 6).
6. Discovery Service stage
This stage is required if the BOOTP or DHCP server (v4 or v6) is
unaware of any iSCSI boot servers or if the BOOTP or DHCP server is
unable to provide the minimum information required to connect to the
iSCSI boot server other than the targetname.
The Discovery Service may be based on the SLP protocol [Guttman99,
Bakke02] and is an instantiation of the SLP Service or Directory
Agent. Alternatively, the Discovery Service may be based on the iSNS
protocol [Tseng03] and is an instantiation of the iSNS Server.
The iSCSI boot client may have obtained the targetname of the iSCSI
Sarkar Expires: August 2004 [Page 5]
Standards Track iSCSI BootStrapping Draft 18 March 2004
boot server in the DHCP stage (Section 5). In that case, the iSCSI
boot client queries the SLP Discovery Service using query string 1 of
the iSCSI Target Concrete Service Type Template as specified in
Section 6.2 of the iSCSI SLP interaction document [Bakke02] to
resolve the targetname to an IP address and port number.
Alternatively, the iSCSI boot client may query the iSNS Discovery
Service with a Device Attribute Query with the targetname as the
query parameter [Tseng03]. Once this is obtained, the iSCSI boot
client proceeds to the Boot stage (Section 7).
It is possible that the port number obtained from the Discovery
Service may conflict with the one obtained from the DHCP stage. In
such a case, the implementor has the option to try both port numbers
in the Boot stage.
If the iSCSI boot client does not have any targetname information,
the iSCSI boot client then may query the SLP Discovery Service with
query string 4 of the iSCSI Target Concrete Service Type Template as
specified in Section 6.2 of the iSCSI SLP interaction document
[Bakke02]. In response to this query, the SLP Discovery Service
provides the boot client with a list of iSCSI boot servers the boot
client is allowed to access. Alternatively, the iSCSI boot client
can query the iSNS Discovery Service to verify if the targets in
particular Discovery Domain are bootable [Tseng03].
If the list of iSCSI boot servers is empty, subsequent actions are
left to the discretion of the implementor. Otherwise, the iSCSI boot
client may contact any iSCSI boot server in the list. Moreover, the
order in which iSCSI boot servers are contacted is also left to the
discretion of the implementor.
7. Boot stage
Once the iSCSI boot client has obtained the minimum information to
open an iSCSI session with the iSCSI boot server, the actual booting
process can start.
The actual sequence of iSCSI commands needed to complete the boot
process is left to the implementor. This was done because of varying
requirements from different vendors and equipment, making it
difficult to specify a common subset of the iSCSI standard that would
be acceptable to everybody.
The iSCSI session established for boot may be taken over by the
booted software in the iSCSI boot client.
8. Security Considerations
Sarkar Expires: August 2004 [Page 6]
Standards Track iSCSI BootStrapping Draft 18 March 2004
The security discussion is centered around securing the communication
involved in the iSCSI boot process.
However, the issue of applying credentials to a boot image loaded
through the iSCSI boot mechanism is outside the scope of this
document. One key difference between the iSCSI boot mechanism and
BOOTP-based image loading is the fact that the identity of a boot
image may not be known when the Boot stage starts. The identity of
certain boot images and their locations are known only after
examining the contents of a boot disk exposed by the iSCSI boot
service. Furthermore, images themselves may recursively load other
images based on both hardware configurations and user input.
Consequently, a practical way to verify loaded boot images is to make
sure that each image loading software verifies the image to be loaded
using a mechanism of their choice.
The considerations involved in designing a security architecture for
the iSCSI boot process include configuration, deployment and
provisioning issues apart from typical security considerations.
Enabling iSCSI boot creates a critical operational dependence on an
external system with obvious security implications, and thus
administrator awareness of such enablement is extremely important.
Therefore, iSCSI boot SHOULD NOT be enabled, or put high in the boot
order, without an explicit administrative action.
In all phases of the boot process, a client must ensure that a server
is authorized to send it certain information. This means that the
authenticated identity of a server must have an authorization
indication. A list of authorized servers can be pre-configured into
a client, or the list can be downloaded in an authenticated form from
a prior stage in the boot process.
The software stage SHOULD NOT be involved in a secure iSCSI boot
process as this would add the additional complexity of trying to
secure the process of loading the software necessary to run the later
stages of iSCSI boot. Authentication and integrity protection of
downloaded boot software has proven to be difficult and complex due
to administrative issues and limitations of the BIOS environment. It
is therefore assumed that all the necessary software is resident on
the iSCSI boot client.
If the DHCP stage is implemented using the DHCP protocol, the iSCSI
boot client SHOULD implement the DHCP authentication ([Droms01],
[Droms02] for IPv6). In this case an administration interface SHOULD
be provided for the configuration of the DHCP authentication
credentials, both when the network interface is on the motherboard,
and when it is removable. Note that DHCP authentication
([Droms01],[Droms02] for IPv6) is focused on intra-domain
Sarkar Expires: August 2004 [Page 7]
Standards Track iSCSI BootStrapping Draft 18 March 2004
authentication, which is assumed to be enough for iSCSI boot
scenarios. In the context of the secure iSCSI boot process, the reply
from the DHCP server in the DHCP stage SHOULD include the serverName
in IPv4 (or IPv6) format to avoid reliance on a DNS server (for
resolving names) or a Discovery Service entity (to look up
targetnames). This reduces the number of entities involved in the
secure iSCSI boot process.
If the Discovery Service stage is implemented using SLP, the iSCSI
boot client SHOULD provide IPsec support (OPTIONAL to use) for the
SLP protocol, as defined in [Bakke02] and [Aboba03]. If the Discovery
Service stage is implemented using iSNS, the iSCSI boot client SHOULD
provide IPsec support (OPTIONAL to use) for the iSNS protocol, as
defined in [Tseng03] and [Aboba03]. When iSNS or SLP are used to
distribute security policy or configuration information, at a
minimum, per-packet data origin authentication, integrity and replay
protection SHOULD be used to protect the discovery protocol.
For the final communication between the iSCSI boot client and the
iSCSI boot server in the Boot stage, IPsec and in-band authentication
SHOULD be implemented according to the guidelines in the main iSCSI
draft [Satran02] and [Aboba03]. Due to memory constraints, it is
expected that iSCSI boot clients will only support the pre-shared key
authentication in IKE. Where the host IP address is assigned
dynamically, IKE main mode SHOULD NOT be used, as explained in
[Satran02] and [Aboba03]. Regardless of the way parameters in
previous stages (DHCP, SLP, iSNS) were obtained (securely or not),
the iSCSI boot session is vulnerable as any iSCSI session (see
[Satran02] and [Aboba03] for iSCSI security threats). Therefore
security for this session SHOULD be configured and used according to
[Satran02] and [Aboba03] guidelines.
Another point to be noted is that if a boot image inherits an iSCSI
session from a previously loaded boot image, the boot image also
inherits the security properties of the iSCSI session.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank John Hufferd for taking the initiative to form the
iSCSI boot team. We also wish to thank Doug Otis, Julian Satran,
Bernard Aboba, David Robinson, Mark Bakke, Ofer Biran and Mallikarjun
Chadalapaka for helpful suggestions and pointers regarding the draft
document.
Normative References
[Aboba03] Aboba, S. et al. "Securing Block Storage Protocols over
Sarkar Expires: August 2004 [Page 8]
Standards Track iSCSI BootStrapping Draft 18 March 2004
IP", Work in Progress, January 2003.
[Alexander93] Alexander, S., and R. Droms, "DHCP Options and BOOTP
Vendor
Extensions", RFC 2132, Lachman Technology, Inc., Bucknell
University, October 1993.
[Bakke02] Bakke, M., et al. "Finding iSCSI Targets and Name Servers
using SLP", Work in Progress, March 2002.
[Bakke04] Bakke, M., "String Profiles for iSCSI Names", Work in
Progress, February 2004.
[Braden89] Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Application
and Support", RFC 1123, October 1989.
[Bradner96] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process --
Revision 3", RFC 2026, October 1996.
[Bradner97] Bradner, S. "Key Words for use in RFCs to indicate
Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, Harvard University, March 1997.
[Croft85] Croft, B., and J. Gilmore, "Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP)",
RFC 951,
Stanford and SUN Microsystems, September 1985.
[Droms93] Droms, D., "Interoperation between DHCP and BOOTP" RFC
1534,
Bucknell University, October 1993.
[Droms97] R. Droms, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC 2131,
Bucknell University, March 1997.
[Droms01] Droms, R., Arbaugh, W., "Authentication for DHCP Messages",
RFC 3118, June 2001.
[Droms02] Droma, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.,
Carney, M., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6", Work in
Progress, November 2002.
[Guttman99] Guttman, E., Perkins, C., Verizades, J., Day, M.,
"Service Location Protocol v2", RFC 2608, June 1999.
[Lee04] Lee, T., Fielding, R., Masinter, L., "Uniform Resource
Identifier (URI): General Syntax", Work in Progress, February 2004.
[Reynolds93] Reynolds, J., "BOOTP Vendor Information Extensions", RFC
1497,
Sarkar Expires: August 2004 [Page 9]
Standards Track iSCSI BootStrapping Draft 18 March 2004
USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1993.
[Satran02] Satran, J. et al., "iSCSI", Work in Progress, September
2002.
[Tseng03] Tseng, J., Gibbons, K., Travostino, F., Du Laney, C.,
Souza, J., "Internet Storage Name Service", Work in Progress, June
2003.
[Yergeau98] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8: A Transformation Format for
ISO-10646", RFC 2279, January 1998.
[Wimer93] Wimer, W., "Clarifications and Extensions for the Bootstrap
Protocol", RFC 1532, Carnegie Mellon University, October 1993.
Informative References
[Brownell96] Brownell, D, "Dynamic RARP extensions for Automatic
Network Adress
Acquisition", RFC 1931, SUN Microsystems, April 1996.
[Finlayson84] Finlayson, R., Mann, T., Mogul, J., and M. Theimer, "A
Reverse
Address Resolution Protocol", RFC 903, Stanford, June 1984.
[Sollins81] Sollins, K., "The TFTP Protocol (Revision 2)", RFC 783,
NIC,
June 1981.
Authors' Addresses
Prasenjit Sarkar
IBM Almaden Research Center
650 Harry Road
San Jose, CA 95120, USA
Phone: +1 408 927 1417
Email: psarkar@almaden.ibm.com
Duncan Missimer
Brocade Communication Systems
1745 Technology Drive,
San Jose, CA 95110, USA
Email: dmissime@brocade.com
Constantine Sapuntzakis
Stanford University
353 Serra Hall #406
Sarkar Expires: August 2004 [Page 10]
Standards Track iSCSI BootStrapping Draft 18 March 2004
Stanford, CA 94306, USA
Phone: +1 650 520 0205
Email: csapuntz@stanford.edu
Full Copyright Statement
"Copyright (C) The Internet Society (date). All Rights Reserved. This
document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE."
Intellectual Property Rights
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of
any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed
to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology
described in this document or the extent to which any license
under such rights might or might not be available; neither does
it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such
rights. Information on the IETF's procedures with respect to
rights in standards-track and standards-related documentation
can be found in BCP-11. Copies of claims of rights made
available for publication and any assurances of licenses to
be made available, or the result of an attempt made
to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
proprietary rights by implementors or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF Secretariat."
Sarkar Expires: August 2004 [Page 11]
Standards Track iSCSI BootStrapping Draft 18 March 2004
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its
attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or
other proprietary rights which may cover technology that may be
required to practice this standard. Please address the
information to the IETF Executive Director.
Sarkar Expires: August 2004 [Page 12]