Network Working Group V. Smyslov
Internet-Draft ELVIS-PLUS
Obsoletes: 6407 (if approved) B. Weis
Intended status: Standards Track Independent
Expires: September 19, 2022 March 18, 2022
Group Key Management using IKEv2
draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-05
Abstract
This document presents an extension to the Internet Key Exchange
version 2 (IKEv2) protocol for the purpose of a group key management.
The protocol is in conformance with the Multicast Security (MSEC) key
management architecture, which contains two components: member
registration and group rekeying. Both components require a Group
Controller/Key Server to download IPsec group security associations
to authorized members of a group. The group members then exchange IP
multicast or other group traffic as IPsec packets. This document
obsoletes RFC 6407.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 19, 2022.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction and Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Requirements Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2. G-IKEv2 Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1. G-IKEv2 Integration into IKEv2 Protocol . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1.1. G-IKEv2 Transport and Port . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2. G-IKEv2 Payloads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3. G-IKEv2 Member Registration and Secure Channel
Establishment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.3.1. GSA_AUTH exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.3.2. GSA_REGISTRATION Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.3.3. GM Registration Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.3.4. GCKS Registration Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.4. Group Maintenance Channel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.4.1. GSA_REKEY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.4.2. GSA_INBAND_REKEY Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.4.3. Deletion of SAs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.5. Counter-based modes of operation . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.5.1. Allocation of SIDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.5.2. GM Usage of SIDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3. Group Key Management and Access Control . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.1. Key Wrap Keys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.1.1. Default Key Wrap Key . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.2. GCKS Key Management Semantics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.2.1. Forward Access Control Requirements . . . . . . . . . 27
3.3. GM Key Management Semantics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.4. SA Keys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4. Header and Payload Formats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4.1. G-IKEv2 Header . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4.2. Group Identification Payload . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4.3. Security Association - GM Supported Transforms Payload . 31
4.4. Group Security Association Payload . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.4.1. Group Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.4.2. Group Security Association Policy Substructure . . . 32
4.4.3. Group Associated Policy Substructure . . . . . . . . 39
4.5. Key Download Payload . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.5.1. Wrapped Key Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.5.2. Group Key Packet Substructure . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.5.3. Member Key Packet Substructure . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4.6. Delete Payload . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
4.7. Notify Payload . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
4.7.1. USE_TRANSPORT_MODE Notification . . . . . . . . . . . 48
4.8. Authentication Payload . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
5. Usigng G-IKEv2 Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
6. Interaction with other IKEv2 Protocol Extensions . . . . . . 51
6.1. Mixing Preshared Keys in IKEv2 for Post-quantum Security 52
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
7.1. GSA Registration and Secure Channel . . . . . . . . . . . 54
7.2. GSA Maintenance Channel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
7.2.1. Authentication/Authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
7.2.2. Confidentiality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
7.2.3. Man-in-the-Middle Attack Protection . . . . . . . . . 55
7.2.4. Replay/Reflection Attack Protection . . . . . . . . . 55
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
8.1. New Registries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
8.2. Changes in the Existing IKEv2 Registries . . . . . . . . 57
9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
10. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Appendix A. Use of LKH in G-IKEv2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
A.1. Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
A.2. Group Creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
A.3. Simple Group SA Rekey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
A.4. Group Member Exclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
1. Introduction and Overview
A group key management protocol provides IPsec keys and policy to a
set of IPsec devices which are authorized to communicate using a
Group Security Association (GSA) defined in [RFC3740]. The data
communications within the group (e.g., IP multicast packets) are
protected by a key pushed to the group members (GMs) by the Group
Controller/Key Server (GCKS). This document presents an extension to
IKEv2 [RFC7296] called G-IKEv2, that allows to perform a group key
management.
G-IKEv2 conforms to the Multicast Group Security Architecture
[RFC3740], Multicast Extensions to the Security Architecture for the
Internet Protocol [RFC5374] and the Multicast Security (MSEC) Group
Key Management Architecture [RFC4046]. G-IKEv2 replaces GDOI
[RFC6407], which defines a similar group key management protocol
using IKEv1 [RFC2409] (since deprecated by IKEv2). When G-IKEv2 is
used, group key management use cases can benefit from the simplicity,
increased robustness and cryptographic improvements of IKEv2 (see
Appendix A of [RFC7296].
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
A GM begins a "registration" exchange when it first joins the group.
With G-IKEv2, the GCKS authenticates and authorizes GMs, then pushes
policy and keys used by the group to the GM. G-IKEv2 includes two
"registration" exchanges. The first is the GSA_AUTH exchange (
Section 2.3.1), which is used when a GM first conatcts a GCKS. The
second is the GSA_REGISTRATION exchange (Section 2.3.2), which a GM
can use within an established IKE SA. Group rekeys are accomplished
using either the GSA_REKEY pseudo-exchange (a single message
distributed to all GMs, usually as a multicast message), or as a
GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchange delivered individually to group members
using existing IKE SAs).
Large and small groups may use different sets of these protocols.
When a large group of devices are communicating, the GCKS is likely
to use the GSA_REKEY message for efficiency. This is shown in
Figure 1. (Note: For clarity, IKE_SA_INIT is omitted from the
figure.)
+--------+
+------------->| GCKS |<-------------+
| +--------+ |
| | ^ |
| | | |
| | GSA_AUTH |
| | or |
| | GSA_REGISTRATION |
| | | |
GSA_AUTH | | GSA_AUTH
or GSA_REKEY | or
GSA_REGISTRATION | | GSA_REGISTRATION
| | | |
| +------------+-----------------+ |
| | | | | |
v v v v v v
+-------+ +--------+ +-------+
| GM | ... | GM | ... | GM |
+-------+ +--------+ +-------+
^ ^ ^
| | |
+-------ESP-------+-------ESP------+
Figure 1: G-IKEv2 used in large groups
Alternatively, a small group may simply use the GSA_AUTH as a
registration protocol, where the GCKS issues rekeys using the
GSA_INBAND_REKEY within the same IKE SA. The GCKS is also likely to
be a GM in a small group (as shown in Figure 2.)
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
GSA_AUTH, GSA_INBAND_REKEY
+-----------------------------------------------+
| |
| GSA_AUTH, GSA_INBAND_REKEY |
| +-----------------------------+ |
| | | |
| | GSA_AUTH, GSA_INBAND_REKEY | |
| | +--------+ | |
v v v v v v
+---------+ +----+ +----+ +----+
| GCKS/GM | | GM | | GM | | GM |
+---------+ +----+ +----+ +----+
^ ^ ^ ^
| | | |
+----ESP-----+------ESP-------+-----ESP-----+
Figure 2: G-IKEv2 used in small groups
A combination of these approaches is also possible. For example, the
GCKS may use more robust GSA_INBAND_REKEY to provide keys for some
GMs (for example, those acting as senders in the group) and GSA_REKEY
for the rest.
IKEv2 message semantics are preserved in that all communications
consists of message request-response pairs. The exception to this
rule is the GSA_REKEY pseudo-exchange, which is a single message
delivering group updates to the GMs.
1.1. Requirements Notation
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
1.2. Terminology
It is assumed that readers are familiar with the IPsec architecture
[RFC4301], its extension for multicast [RFC5374]. This document
defines an extension to the IKEv2 protocol [RFC7296], so it is
assumed that readers have good understanding of this protocol.
The following key terms are used throughout this document (mostly
borrowed from [RFC5374] and [RFC6407]).
Group
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
A set of devices that work together to protect group
communications.
Group Member (GM)
An IPsec device that belongs to a group. A Group Member is
authorized to be a Group Sender and/or a Group Receiver.
Group Receiver
A Group Member that is authorized to receive packets sent to a
group by a Group Sender.
Group Sender
A Group Member that is authorized to send packets to a group.
Group Key Management (GKM) Protocol
A key management protocol used by a GCKS to distribute IPsec
Security Association policy and keying material. A GKM
protocol is used when a group of IPsec devices require the same
SAs. For example, when an IPsec SA describes an IP multicast
destination, the sender and all receivers need to have the
group SA.
Group Controller Key Server (GCKS)
A Group Key Management (GKM) protocol server that manages IPsec
state for a group. A GCKS authenticates and provides the IPsec
SA policy and keying material to GKM Group Members.
Data-Security SA
The security policy distributed by a GDOI GCKS describing
traffic that is expected to be protected by group members.
This document described the distribution of IPsec AH and ESP
Data-Security SAs.
Rekey SA
The security policy protecting Group Key Management Protocol.
Group Security Association (GSA)
A collection of Data-Security Associations (SAs) and Rekey SAs
necessary for a Group Member to receive key updates. A GSA
describes the working policy for a group. Refer to [RFC4046]
for additional information.
Traffic Encryption Key (TEK)
The symmetric cipher key used in a Data-Security SA (e.g.,
IPsec ESP) to protect trafic.
Key Encryption Key (KEK)
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
The symmetric cipher key used in a Rekey SA to protect
distribution of new keys.
Key Wrap Key (KWK)
The symmetric cipher key used to protect another key.
Group Associated Policy (GAP)
Group-wide policy not related to a particular SA.
Sender-ID (SID)
A unigue identifier of a Group Sender in the context of an
active GSA, used to form Initialization Vector (IV) in counter-
based cipher modes.
Logical Key Hierarchy (LKH)
A group management method defined in Section 5.4 of [RFC2627].
2. G-IKEv2 Protocol
2.1. G-IKEv2 Integration into IKEv2 Protocol
G-IKEv2 is an extension to IKEv2 and uses its security mechanisms
(peer authentication, confidentiality, message integrity) to ensure
that only authenticated devices have access to the group policy and
keys. G-IKEv2 further provides group authorization, and secure
policy and key download from the GCKS to GMs.
G-IKEv2 is compatible with most IKEv2 extensions defined so far and
it is believed that future IKEv2 extensions will also be possible to
use with G-IKEv2. However some IKEv2 extensions require special
handling if used with G-IKEv2. See Section 6 for more details.
It is assumed that readers are familiar with the IKEv2 protocol, so
this document skips many details that are described in [RFC7296].
2.1.1. G-IKEv2 Transport and Port
G-IKEv2 SHOULD use UDP port 848, the same as GDOI [RFC6407], because
they serve a similar function. They can use the same ports, just as
IKEv1 and IKEv2 can share port 500. The version number in the IKE
header distinguishes the G-IKEv2 protocol from GDOI protocol
[RFC6407]. G-IKEv2 MAY also use the IKEv2 ports (500, 4500), which
would provide a better integration with IKEv2. G-IKEv2 MAY also use
TCP transport for registration (unicast) IKE SA, as defined in
[RFC8229].
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
2.2. G-IKEv2 Payloads
In the following descriptions, the payloads contained in the G-IKEv2
messages are indicated by names as listed below.
Notation Payload
------------------------------------------------------------
AUTH Authentication
CERT Certificate
CERTREQ Certificate Request
D Delete
GSA Group Security Association
HDR IKEv2 Header
IDg Identification - Group
IDi Identification - Initiator
IDr Identification - Responder
KD Key Download
KE Key Exchange
Ni, Nr Nonce
N Notify
SA Security Association
SAg Security Association - GM Supported Transforms
Payloads defined as part of other IKEv2 extensions MAY also be
included in these messages. Payloads that may optionally appear in
G-IKEv2 messages will be shown in brackets, such as [CERTREQ].
G-IKEv2 defines several new payloads not used in IKEv2:
o IDg (Group ID) - The GM requests the GCKS for membership into the
group by sending its IDg payload.
o GSA (Group Security Association) - The GCKS sends the group policy
to the GM using this payload.
o KD (Key Download) - The GCKS sends the keys and the security
parameters to the GMs using the KD payload.
o SAg (Security Association - GM Supported Transforms) - the GM
sends supported transforms, so that GCKS may select a policy
appropriate for all members of the group.
The details of the contents of each payload are described in
Section 4.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
2.3. G-IKEv2 Member Registration and Secure Channel Establishment
The registration protocol consists of a minimum of two exchanges,
IKE_SA_INIT and GSA_AUTH; member registration may have a few more
messages exchanged if the EAP method, cookie challenge (for DoS
protection), negotiation of Diffie-Hellman group or IKEv2 extensions
based on [I-D.ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate] are used. Each
exchange consists of request/response pairs. The first exchange
IKE_SA_INIT is defined in IKEv2 [RFC7296]. This exchange negotiates
cryptographic algorithms, exchanges nonces and computes a shared key
between the GM and the GCKS.
The second exchange GSA_AUTH authenticates the previously exchanged
messages, exchanges identities and certificates. The GSA_AUTH
messages are encrypted and integrity protected with keys established
through the previous exchanges, so the identities are hidden from
eavesdroppers and all fields in all the messages are authenticated.
The GCKS SHOULD authorize group members to be allowed into the group
as part of the GSA_AUTH exchange. Once the GCKS accepts a group
member to join a group it will download the data security keys (TEKs)
and/or group key encrypting key (KEK) as part of the GSA_AUTH
response message.
2.3.1. GSA_AUTH exchange
After the group member and GCKS negotiate cryptographic algorithms,
exchange nonces, and compute shared keys as defined in IKEv2
[RFC7296], the GSA_AUTH exchange MUST complete before any other
exchanges defined in this document can be done. GSA_AUTH is used to
authenticate the previous exchanges, exchange identities and
certificates. G-IKEv2 also uses this exchange for group member
registration and authorization.
The GSA_AUTH exchange is identical to the IKE_AUTH exchange with the
difference that its goal is to establish multicast Data-Security SAs
and optionally provide GM with the keys for Rekey SA. The set of
payloads in the GSA_AUTH exchange is slightly different, because
policy is not negotiated between the group member and the GCKS, but
instead downloaded from the GCKS to the group member. Note also,
that GSA_AUTH has its own exchange type, which is different from the
IKE_AUTH exchange type.
Nevertheless, the security properties of the GSA_AUTH exchange are
the same as the properties of the IKE_AUTH exchange and most IKEv2
extensions to the IKE_AUTH exchange (like [RFC6467]) can also be used
with the GSA_AUTH exchange.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
Initiator (Member) Responder (GCKS)
-------------------- ------------------
HDR, SK{IDi, [CERT,] [CERTREQ,] [IDr,]
AUTH, IDg, [SAg,] [N]} -->
Figure 3: GSA_AUTH Request
A group member initiates a GSA_AUTH request to join a group indicated
by the IDg payload. The GM MAY include an SAg payload declaring
which Transforms it is willing to accept. A GM that intends to act
as Group Sender SHOULD include a Notify payload status type of
SENDER, which enables the GCKS to provide any additional policy
necessary by group senders.
Initiator (Member) Responder (GCKS)
-------------------- ------------------
<-- HDR, SK{IDr, [CERT,]
AUTH, [GSA, KD,] [N,]}
Figure 4: GSA_AUTH Normal Response
The GCKS responds with IDr, optional CERT, and AUTH payloads as if it
were an IKE_AUTH. It also informs the group member of the
cryptographic policies of the group in the GSA payload and the key
material in the KD payload.
In addition to the IKEv2 error handling, the GCKS can reject the
registration request when the IDg is invalid or authorization fails,
etc. In these cases, see Section 4.7, the GSA_AUTH response will not
include the GSA and KD, but will include a Notify payload indicating
errors. If a GM included an SAg payload, and the GCKS chooses to
evaluate it, and the GCKS detects that the group member cannot
support the security policy defined for the group, then the GCKS
SHOULD return a NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN. Other types of error
notifications can be INVALID_GROUP_ID, AUTHORIZATION_FAILED or
REGISTRATION_FAILED.
Initiator (Member) Responder (GCKS)
-------------------- ------------------
<-- HDR, SK{IDr, [CERT,] AUTH, N}
Figure 5: GSA_AUTH Error Response
If the group member finds the policy sent by the GCKS is
unacceptable, the member SHOULD initiate GSA_REGISTRATION exchange
sending IDg and the Notify NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN (see Section 2.3.2)).
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
2.3.2. GSA_REGISTRATION Exchange
When a secure channel is already established between a GM and the
GCKS, the GM registration for a group can reuse the established
secure channel. In this scenario the GM will use the
GSA_REGISTRATION exchange. Payloads in the exchange are generated
and processed as defined in Section 2.3.1.
Initiator (Member) Responder (GCKS)
-------------------- ------------------
HDR, SK{IDg, [SAg,][N ]} -->
<-- HDR, SK{GSA,] [N,]}
Figure 6: GSA_REGISTRATION Normal Exchange
As with GSA_AUTH exchange, the GCKS can reject the registration
request when the IDg is invalid or authorization fails, or GM cannot
support the security policy defined for the group (which can be
concluded by GCKS by evaluation of SAg payload). In this case the
GCKS returns an appropriate error notification as described in
Section 2.3.1.
Initiator (Member) Responder (GCKS)
-------------------- ------------------
HDR, SK{IDg, [SAg,] [N]} -->
<-- HDR, SK{N}
Figure 7: GSA_REGISTRATION Error Exchange
This exchange can also be used if the group member finds the policy
sent by the GCKS is unacceptable. The group member SHOULD notify the
GCKS by sending IDg and the Notify type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN, as shown
below. The GCKS in this case MUST remove the GM from the group IDg.
Initiator (Member) Responder (GCKS)
-------------------- ------------------
HDR, SK{IDg, N} -->
<-- HDR, SK{}
Figure 8: GM Reporting Errors in GSA_REGISTRATION Exchange
2.3.3. GM Registration Operations
A G-IKEv2 Initiator (GM) requesting registration contacts the GCKS
using the IKE_SA_INIT exchange and receives the response from the
GCKS. This exchange is unchanged from the IKE_SA_INIT in IKEv2
protocol. The IKE_SA_INIT exchange may optionally be followed by one
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
or more the IKE_INTERMEDIATE exchanges if the GM and the GCKS
negotiated using IKEv2 extensions based on this exchange.
Next the GM sends the GSA_AUTH request message with the IKEv2
payloads from IKE_AUTH (without the SAi2, TSi and TSr payloads) along
with the Group ID informing the GCKS of the group the initiator
wishes to join. An initiator intending to emit data traffic SHOULD
send a SENDER Notify payload status. The SENDER notification not
only signifies that it is a sender, but provides the initiator the
ability to request Sender-ID (SID) values, in case the Data-Security
SA supports a counter mode cipher. Section 2.5) includes guidance on
requesting Sender-ID values.
A GM may be limited in the types of Transforms that it is able or
willing to use, and may find it useful to inform the GCKS which
Transforms it is willing to accept for different security protocols
by including the SAg payload into the request message. Proposals for
Rekey SA (with protocol GIKE_REKEY) and for Data-Security (AH
[RFC4302] and/or ESP [RFC4303]) SAs may be included into SAg. Each
Proposal contains a list of Transforms that the GM is able and
willing to support for that protocol. Valid transform types depend
on the protocol and are defined in Figure 16. Other transform types
SHOULD NOT be included. The SPI length of each Proposal in an SAg is
set to zero, and thus the SPI field is empty. The GCKS MUST ignore
SPI length and SPI fields in the SAg payload.
Generally, a single Proposal of each type will suffice, because the
group member is not negotiating Transform sets, simply alerting the
GCKS to restrictions it may have. In particular, the restriction
from Section 3.3 of [RFC7296] that AEAD and non-AEAD transforms must
not be combined in a single proposal doesn't hold when the SAg
payload is being formed. However if the GM has restrictions on
combination of algorithms, this can be expressed by sending several
proposals.
Proposal Num field in Proposal substructure is treated specially in
SAg payload: it allows a GM to indicate that algorithms used in Rekey
SA and in Data-Security (AH and/or ESP) SAs are dependent. In
particular, Proposals of different types having the same value in
Proposal Num field are treated as a set, so that if GCKS uses
transforms from one of such Proposal for one protocol, then it MUST
only use transforms from one of the Proposals with the same value in
Proposal Num field for other protocols. For example, a GM may
support algorithms X and Y for both Rekey and Data-Security SAs, but
with a restriction that if X is used in Rekey SA, then only X can be
used in Data-Security SAs, and the same for Y. To indicate this the
GM sends several Proposals marking those of them that must be used in
conjunction by putting the same value in their Proposal Num field.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
In the simplest case when no dependency between transforms exists,
all Proposals in SAg payload will have the same value in Proposal Num
field.
Although the SAg payload is optional, it is RECOMMENDED for the GM to
include this payload into the GSA_AUTH request to allow the GCKS to
select an appropriate policy.
A GM may also indicate the support for IPcomp by inclusion one or
more the IPCOMP_SUPPORTED notifications along with the SAg payload.
The CPI in these notifications is set to zero and MUST be ignored by
the GCKS.
Upon receiving the GSA_AUTH response, the initiator parses the
response from the GCKS authenticating the exchange using the IKEv2
method, then processes the GSA and KD payloads.
The GSA payload contains the security policy and cryptographic
protocols used by the group. This policy describes the optional
Rekey SA (KEK), Data-security SAs (TEK), and optional Group
Associated policy (GAP). If the policy in the GSA payload is not
acceptable to the GM, it SHOULD notify the GCKS by initiating a
GSA_REGISTRATION exchange with a NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN Notify payload
(see Section 2.3.2). Note, that this should normally not happen if
the GM includes SAg payload in the GSA_AUTH request and the GCKS
takes it into account. Finally the KD payload is parsed providing
the keying material for the TEK and/or KEK. The GM interprets the KD
key packets, where each key packet includes the keying material for
SAs distributed in the GSA payload. Keying material is matched by
comparing the SPIs in the key packets to SPIs previously included in
the GSA payloads. Once TEK keys and policy are matched, the GM
provides them to the data security subsystem, and it is ready to send
or receive packets matching the TEK policy.
The GSA KEK policy MUST include the attribute GSA_INITIAL_MESSAGE_ID
with a first Message ID the GM should expect to receive if it is non-
zero. The value of the attribute MUST be checked by a GM against any
previously received Message ID for this group. If it is less than
the previously received number, it should be considered stale and
ignored. This could happen if two GSA_AUTH exchanges happened in
parallel, and the Message ID changed. This attribute is used by the
GM to prevent GSA_REKEY message replay attacks. The first GSA_REKEY
message that the GM receives from the GCKS must have a Message ID
greater or equal to the Message ID received in the
GSA_INITIAL_MESSAGE_ID attribute.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
Once a GM successfully registers to the group it MUST replace any
information related to this group (policy, keys) that it might have
as a result of a previous registration with a new one.
Once a GM has received GIKE_REKEY policy during a registration the
IKE SA may be closed. However, the GM SHOULD NOT close IKE SA, it is
the GCKS who makes the decision whether to close or keep it, because
depending on the policy the IKE SA may be used for inband rekeying
for small groups. If inband rekeying is used, then the initial IKE
SA is rekeyed (when necessary) via standard IKEv2 mechanism described
in Section 1.3.2 of [RFC7296]. If for some reason this SA is teared
down and no GIKE_REKEY policy was received during the registration
process, the GM MUST consider itself excluded from the group. To
continue participating in the group the GM should re-register.
2.3.4. GCKS Registration Operations
A G-IKEv2 GCKS passively listens for incoming requests from group
members. When the GCKS receives an IKE_SA_INIT request, it selects
an IKE proposal and generates a nonce and DH to include them in the
IKE_SA_INIT response.
Upon receiving the GSA_AUTH request, the GCKS authenticates the group
member using the same procedures as in the IKEv2 IKE_AUTH. The GCKS
then authorizes the group member according to group policy before
preparing to send the GSA_AUTH response. If the GCKS fails to
authorize the GM, it will respond with an AUTHORIZATION_FAILED notify
message. The GCKS may also respond with an INVALID_GROUP_ID notify
message if the requested group is unknown to the GCKS or with an
REGISTRATION_FAILED notify message if there is a problem with the
requested group (for example the capacity of the group is exceeded).
The GSA_AUTH response will include the group policy in the GSA
payload and keys in the KD payload. If the GCKS policy includes a
group rekey option, it MUST include the GSA_INITIAL_MESSAGE_ID
attribute, specifying the starting Message ID the GCKS will use when
sending the GSA_REKEY message to the group members if this Message ID
is non-zero. This Message ID is used to prevent GSA_REKEY message
replay attacks and will be increased each time a GSA_REKEY message is
sent to the group. The GCKS data traffic policy is included in the
GSA TEK and keys are included in the KD TEK. The GAP MAY also be
included to provide the ATD and/or DTD (Section 4.4.3.1) specifying
activation and deactivation delays for SAs generated from the TEKs.
If the group member has indicated that it is a sender of data traffic
and one or more Data Security SAs distributed in the GSA payload
included a counter mode of operation, the GCKS responds with one or
more SIDs (see Section 2.5).
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
[RFC5374] defines two modes of operation for multicast Data-Securirt
SAs: transport mode and tunnel mode with address preservation. In
the latter case outer source and destination addresses are taken from
the inner IP packet.
If the GCKS receives a GSA_REGISTRATION exchange with a request to
register a GM to a group, the GCKS will need to authorize the GM with
the new group (IDg) and respond with the corresponding group policy
and keys. If the GCKS fails to authorize the GM, it will respond
with the AUTHORIZATION_FAILED notification. The GCKS may also
respond with an INVALID_GROUP_ID or REGISTRATION_FAILED notify
messages for the reasons described above.
If a group member includes an SAg in its GSA_AUTH or GSA_REGISTRATION
request, the GCKS may evaluate it according to an implementation
specific policy.
o The GCKS could evaluate the list of Transforms and compare it to
its current policy for the group. If the group member did not
include all of the ESP or AH Transforms that match the current
group policy, then the GCKS SHOULD return a NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
Notification.
o The GCKS could store the list of Transforms, with the goal of
migrating the group policy to a different Transforms when all of
the group members indicate that they can support that Transforms.
o The GCKS could store the list of Transforms and adjust the current
group policy based on the capabilities of the devices as long as
they fall within the acceptable security policy of the GCKS.
Depending on its policy, the GCKS may have no need for the IKE SA
(e.g., it does not plan to initiate an GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchange).
If the GM does not initiate another registration exchange or Notify
(e.g., NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN), and also does not close the IKE SA and
the GCKS is not intended to use the SA, then after a short period of
time the GCKS SHOULD close the IKE SA.
2.4. Group Maintenance Channel
The GCKS is responsible for rekeying the secure group per the group
policy. Rekeying is an operation whereby the GCKS provides
replacement TEKs and KEK, deleting TEKs, and/or excluding group
members. The GCKS may initiate a rekey message if group membership
and/or policy has changed, or if the keys are about to expire. Two
forms of group maintenance channels are provided in G-IKEv2 to push
new policy to group members.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
GSA_REKEY The GSA_REKEY is a pseudo-exchange initiated by the GCKS,
where the rekey policy is usually delivered to group members using
IP multicast as a transport. This is not a real IKEv2 exchange,
since no response messages are sent. This method is valuable for
large and dynamic groups, and where policy may change frequently
and a scalable rekeying method is required. When the GSA_REKEY is
used, the IKE SA protecting the member registration exchanges is
usually terminated, and group members await policy changes from
the GCKS via the GSA_REKEY messages.
GSA_INBAND_REKEY The GSA_INBAND_REKEY is a normal IKEv2 exchange
using the IKE SA that was setup to protecting the member
registration exchange. This exchange allows the GCKS to rekey
without using an independent GSA_REKEY pseudo-exchange. The
GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchange provides a reliable policy delivery and
is useful when G-IKEv2 is used with a small group of cooperating
devices.
Depending on its policy the GCKS MAY combine these two methods. For
example, it may use the GSA_INBAND_REKEY to deliver key to the GMs in
the group acting as senders (as this would provide reliable keys
delivery), and the GSA_REKEY for the rest GMs.
2.4.1. GSA_REKEY
The GCKS initiates the G-IKEv2 Rekey securely, usually using IP
multicast. Since this rekey does not require a response and it sends
to multiple GMs, G-IKEv2 rekeying MUST NOT use IKE SA windowing
mechanism, described in Section 2.3 of [RFC7296]. The GCKS rekey
message replaces the rekey GSA KEK or KEK array, and/or creates a new
Data-Security GSA TEK. The GM_SID attribute in the Key Download
payload (defined in Section 4.5.3.3) MUST NOT be part of the Rekey
Exchange as this is sender specific information and the Rekey
Exchange is group specific. The GCKS initiates the GSA_REKEY pseudo-
exchange as following:
Members (Responder) GCKS (Initiator)
-------------------- ------------------
<-- HDR, SK{GSA, KD, [N,] [D,] [AUTH]}
Figure 9: GSA_REKEY Pseudo-Exchange
HDR is defined in Section 4.1. The Message ID in this message will
start with the value the GCKS sent to the group members in the
attribute GSA_INITIAL_MESSAGE_ID or from zero if this attribute
wasn't sent. The Message ID will be incremented each time a new
GSA_REKEY message is sent to the group members.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
The GSA payload contains the current policy for rekey and Data-
Security SAs. The GSA may contain a new Rekey SA and/or a new Data-
Security SAs Section 4.4.
The KD payload contains the keys for the policy included in the GSA.
If the Data-Security SA is being refreshed in this rekey message, the
IPsec keys are updated in the KD, and/or if the rekey SA is being
refreshed in this rekey message, the rekey Key or the LKH KEK array
is updated in the KD payload.
A Delete payload MAY be included to instruct the GM to delete
existing SAs. See Section 4.6 for more detail.
The AUTH payload MUST be included to authenticate the GSA_REKEY
message if the authentication method is based on public key
signatures or a dedicated shared secret and MUST NOT be included if
authentication is implicit. In a latter case, the fact that a GM can
decrypt the GSA_REKEY message and verify its ICV proves that the
sender of this message knows the current KEK, thus authenticating
that the sender is a member of the group. Shared secret and implicit
authentication don't provide source origin authentication. For this
reason using implicit authentication for GSA_REKEY is NOT RECOMMENDED
unless source origin authentication is not required (for example, in
a small group of highly trusted GMs). If AUTH payload is included
then the Auth Method field MUST NOT be NULL Authentication.
During group member registration, the GCKS sends the authentication
key in the KD payload, AUTH_KEY attribute, which the group member
uses to authenticate the key server. Before the current
Authentication Key expires, the GCKS will send a new AUTH_KEY to the
group members in a GSA_REKEY message. The AUTH key that is sent in
the rekey message may be not the same as the authentication key sent
during the GM registration. If implicit authentication is used, then
AUTH_KEY MUST NOT be sent to GMs.
2.4.1.1. GSA_REKEY Messages Authentication
The content of the AUTH payload depends on the authentication method
and is either a digital signature or a result of prf applied to the
content of the not yet encrypted GSA_REKEY message.
The authentication algorithm (prf or digital signing) is applied to
the concatenation of two chunks: A and P. The chunk A lasts from the
first octet of the G-IKEv2 header (not including prepended four
octets of zeros, if port 4500 is used) to the last octet of the
Encrypted Payload header. The chunk P consists of the not yet
encrypted content of the Encrypted payload, excluding the
Initialization Vector, the Padding, the Pad Length and the Integrity
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
Checksum Data fields (see 3.14 of [RFC7296] for description of the
Encrypted payload). In other words, the P chunk is the inner
payloads of the Encrypted payload in plaintext form. Figure 10
illustrates the layout of the P and A chunks in the GSA_REKEY
message.
Before the AUTH payload calculation the inner payloads of Encrypted
payload must be fully formed and ready for encryption except for the
AUTH payload. The AUTH payload must have correct values in the
Payload Header, the Auth Method and the RESERVED fields. The
Authentication Data field is zeroed, but if Digital Signature
authentication method is in use, then the ASN.1 Length and the
AlgorithmIdentifier fields must be properly filled in, see [RFC7427].
For the purpose of the AUTH payload calculation the Length field in
the IKE header and the Payload Length field in the Encrypted Payload
header are adjusted so that they don't count the lengths of
Initialization Vector, Integrity Checksum Data and Padding (along
with Pad Length field). In other words, the Length field in the IKE
header (denoted as AdjustedLen in Figure 10 ) is set to the sum of
the lengths of A and P, and the Payload Length field in the Encrypted
Payload header (denoted as AdjustedPldLen in Figure 10) is set to the
length of P plus the size of the Payload header (four octets).
DataToAuthenticate = A | P
GsaRekeyMessage = GenIKEHDR | EncPayload
GenIKEHDR = [ four octets 0 if using port 4500 ] | AdjustedIKEHDR
AdjustedIKEHDR = SPIi | SPIr | . . . | AdjustedLen
EncPayload = AdjustedEncPldHdr | IV | InnerPlds | Pad | PadLen | ICV
AdjustedEncPldHdr = NextPld | C | RESERVED | AdjustedPldLen
A = AdjustedIKEHDR | AdjustedEncPldHdr
P = InnerPlds
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ^ ^
| G-IKEv2 SA Initiator's SPI | | |
| | | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ I |
| G-IKEv2 SA Responder's SPI | K |
| | E |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| Next Payload | MjVer | MnVer | Exchange Type | Flags | H A
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ d |
| Message ID | r |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |
| AdjustedLen | | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ x |
| Next Payload |C| RESERVED | AdjustedPldLen | | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | v
| | |
~ Initialization Vector ~ E
| | n
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ c ^
| | r |
~ Inner payloads (not yet encrypted) ~ P
| | P |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ l v
~ Padding (0-255 octets) | Pad Length | d
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| | |
~ Integrity Checksum Data ~ |
| | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ v
Figure 10: Data to Authenticate in the GSA_REKEY Messages
The authentication data is calculated using the authentication
algorithm from the Authentication Method transform and the current
authentication key provided in the AUTH_KEY attribute. Depending on
the authentication method the authentication data is a digital
signature or a result of applying prf from the Pseudorandom Function
transform. The calculated authentication data is placed into the
AUTH payload, the Length fields in the IKE Header and the Encryption
Payload header are restored, the content of the Encrypted payload is
encrypted and the ICV is computed using the current KEK keys.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
2.4.1.2. IKE Fragmentation
IKE fragmentation [RFC7383] can be used to perform fragmentation of
large GSA_REKEY messages, however when the GSA_REKEY message is
emitted as an IP multicast packet there is a lack of response from
the GMs. This has the following implications.
o Policy regarding the use of IKE fragmentation is implicit. If a
GCKS detects that all GMs have negotiated support of IKE
fragmentation in IKE_SA_INIT, then it MAY use IKE fragmentation on
large GSA_REKEY messages.
o The GCKS must always use IKE fragmentation based on a known
fragmentation threshold (unspecified in this memo), as there is no
way to check if fragmentation is needed by first sending
unfragmented messages and waiting for response.
o PMTU probing cannot be performed due to lack of GSA_REKEY response
message.
The calculation of authentication data MUST be applied to whole
messages only, before possible IKE Fragmentation. If the message was
received in fragmented form, it should be reconstructed before
verifying its authenticity as if it were received unfragmented. The
RESERVED field in the reconstructed Encrypted Payload header MUST be
set to the value of the RESERVED field in the Encrypted Fragment
payload header from the first fragment (that with Fragment Number
equal to 1).
2.4.1.3. GSA_REKEY GCKS Operations
The GCKS builds the rekey message with a Message ID value that is one
greater than the value included in the previous rekey message. The
first message sent over a new Rekey SA must have the Message ID 0.
The GSA, KD, N and D payloads follow with the same characteristics as
in the GSA Registration exchange. The AUTH payload (if present) is
created as defined in Section 2.4.1.1.
Because GSA_REKEY messages are not acknowledged and could be
discarded by the network, one or more GMs may not receive the new
policy. To mitigate such lost messages, during a rekey event the
GCKS may transmit several GSA_REKEY messages with the new policy.
The retransmitted messages MUST be bitwise identical and SHOULD be
sent within a short time interval (a few seconds) to ensure that
time-to-live would not be substantially skewed for the GMs that would
receive different copies of the messages.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
GCKS may also include one or several GSA_NEXT_SPI attributes
specifying SPIs for the prospected rekeys, so that listening GMs are
able to detect lost rekey messages and recover from this situation.
See Sections Section 4.4.2.2.3 for more detail.
2.4.1.4. GSA_REKEY GM Operations
When a group member receives the Rekey Message from the GCKS it
decrypts the message using the current KEK, validates its
authenticity using the key retrieved in a previous G-IKEv2 exchange
if AUTH payload is present, verifies the Message ID, and processes
the GSA and KD payloads. The group member then downloads the new
Data-Security SA and/or new Rekey SA. The parsing of the payloads is
identical to the parsing done in the registration exchange.
Replay protection is achieved by a group member rejecting a GSA_REKEY
message which has a Message ID smaller than the current Message ID
that the GM is expecting. The GM expects the Message ID in the first
GSA_REKEY message it receives to be equal or greater than the Message
ID it receives in the GSA_INITIAL_MESSAGE_ID attribute. Note, that
if no this attribute was received for the Rekey SA, the GM MUST
assume zero as the first expected Message ID. The GM expects the
Message ID in subsequent GSA_REKEY messages to be greater than the
last valid GSA_REKEY message ID it received.
If the GSA payload includes a Data-Security SA using cipher in a
counter-modes of operation and the receiving group member is a sender
for that SA, the group member uses its current SID value with the
Data-Security SAs to create counter-mode nonces. If it is a sender
and does not hold a current SID value, it MUST NOT install the Data-
Security SAs. It MAY initiate a GSA_REGISTRATION exchange to the
GCKS in order to obtain an SID value (along with the current group
policy).
Once a new Rekey SA is installed as a result of GSA_REKEY message,
the current Rekey SA (over which the message was received) MUST be
silently deleted after waiting DEACTIVATION_TIME_DELAY interval
regardless of its expiration time. If the message includes Delete
payload for existing Data-security SA, then after installing a new
Data-Security SA the old one, identified by the Protocol and SPI
fields in the Delete payload, MUST be silently deleted after waiting
DEACTIVATION_TIME_DELAY interval regardless of its expiration time.
If a Data-Security SA is not rekeyed yet and is about to expire (a
"soft lifetime" expiration is described in Section 4.4.2.1 of
[RFC4301]), the GM SHOULD initiate a registration to the GCKS. This
registration serves as a request for current SAs, and will result in
the download of replacement SAs, assuming the GCKS policy has created
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
them. A GM SHOULD also initiate a registration request if a Rekey SA
is about to expire and not yet replaced with a new one.
2.4.2. GSA_INBAND_REKEY Exchange
When the IKE SA protecting the member registration exchange is
maintained while group member participates in the group, the GCKS can
use the GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchange to individually provide policy
updates to the group member.
Member (Responder) GCKS (Initiator)
-------------------- ------------------
<-- HDR, SK{GSA, KD, [N,] [D]}
HDR, SK{} -->
Figure 11: GSA_INBAND_REKEY Exchange
Because this is a normal IKEv2 exchange, the HDR is treated as
defined in [RFC7296].
2.4.2.1. GSA_INBAND_REKEY GCKS Operations
The GSA, KD, N and D payloads are built in the same manner as in a
registration exchange.
2.4.2.2. GSA_INBAND_REKEY GM Operations
The GM processes the GSA, KD, N and D payloads in the same manner as
if they were received in a registration exchange.
2.4.3. Deletion of SAs
There are occasions when the GCKS may want to signal to group members
to delete policy at the end of a broadcast, or if group policy has
changed. Deletion of SAs is accomplished by sending the G-IKEv2
Delete Payload [RFC7296], section 3.11 as part of the GSA_REKEY
pseudo-exchange as shown below.
Members (Responder) GCKS (Initiator)
-------------------- ------------------
<-- HDR, SK{[GSA,] [KD,] [N,] [D,] [AUTH]}
Figure 12: SA Deletion in GSA_REKEY
If GCKS has a unicast SA with group member then it can use the
GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchange to delete SAs.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
Member (Responder) GCKS (Initiator)
-------------------- ------------------
<-- HDR, SK{[GSA,] [KD,] [N,] [D,]}
HDR, SK{} -->
Figure 13: SA Deletion in GSA_INBAND_REKEY
The GCKS MAY specify the remaining active time of the policy by using
the GAP_DTD attribute in the GSA GAP substructure. If a GCKS has no
further SAs to send to group members, the GSA and KD payloads MUST be
omitted from the message.
There may be circumstances where the GCKS may want to start over with
a clean state, for example in case it runs out of available SIDs.
The GCKS can signal deletion of all the Data-security SAs by sending
a Delete payload with an SPI value equal to zero. For example, if
the GCKS wishes to remove the Rekey SA and all the Data-security SAs,
the GCKS sends a Delete payload with an SPI of zero and Protocol ID
of AH or ESP, followed by another Delete payload with a SPI of zero
and Protocol ID of GIKE_REKEY.
If a group member receives a Delete payload with zero SPI and
protocol ID of GIKE_REKEY either via multicast Rekey SA or via
unicast SA using the GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchange, it means that the
group member is excluded from the group. The group member MUST re-
register if it wants to continue participating in this group. The
registration is performed as described in Section 2.3. Note, that if
the GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchange is used to exclude a group member from
the group, and thus the unicast SA between the group member and the
GCKS exists, then this SA persists after this exchange and the group
member may use the GSA_REGISTRATION exchange to re-register.
2.5. Counter-based modes of operation
Several counter-based modes of operation have been specified for ESP
(e.g., AES-CTR [RFC3686], AES-GCM [RFC4106], AES-CCM [RFC4309],
ChaCha20-Poly1305 [RFC7634], AES-GMAC [RFC4543]) and AH (e.g., AES-
GMAC [RFC4543]). These counter-based modes require that no two
senders in the group ever send a packet with the same Initialization
Vector (IV) using the same cipher key and mode. This requirement is
met in G-IKEv2 when the following requirements are met:
o The GCKS distributes a unique key for each Data-Security SA.
o The GCKS uses the method described in [RFC6054], which assigns
each sender a portion of the IV space by provisioning each sender
with one or more unique SID values.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
2.5.1. Allocation of SIDs
When at least one Data-Security SA included in the group policy
includes a counter-based mode of operation, the GCKS automatically
allocates and distributes one SID to each group member acting in the
role of sender on the Data-Security SA. The SID value is used
exclusively by the group sender to which it was allocated. The group
sender uses the same SID for each Data-Security SA specifying the use
of a counter-based mode of operation. A GCKS MUST distribute unique
keys for each Data-Security SA including a counter-based mode of
operation in order to maintain unique key and nonce usage.
During registration, the group sender can choose to request one or
more SID values. Requesting a value of 1 is not necessary since the
GCKS will automatically allocate exactly one to the group sender. A
group sender MUST request as many SIDs matching the number of
encryption modules in which it will be installing the TEKs in the
outbound direction. Alternatively, a group sender MAY request more
than one SID and use them serially. This could be useful when it is
anticipated that the group sender will exhaust their range of Data-
Security SA nonces using a single SID too quickly (e.g., before the
time-based policy in the TEK expires).
When the group policy includes a counter-based mode of operation, a
GCKS SHOULD use the following method to allocate SID values, which
ensures that each SID will be allocated to just one group sender.
1. A GCKS maintains an SID-counter, which records the SIDs that have
been allocated. SIDs are allocated sequentially, with zero as
the first allocated SID.
2. Each time an SID is allocated, the current value of the counter
is saved and allocated to the group sender. The SID-counter is
then incremented in preparation for the next allocation.
3. When the GCKS specifies a counter-based mode of operation in the
Data-Security SA a group sender may request a count of SIDs
during registration in a Notify payload information of type
SENDER. When the GCKS receives this request, it increments the
SID-counter once for each requested SID, and distributes each SID
value to the group sender. The GCKS SHOULD have a policy-defined
upper bound for the number of SIDs that it will return
irrespective of the number requested by the GM.
4. A GCKS allocates new SID values for each registration operation
by a group sender, regardless of whether the group sender had
previously contacted the GCKS. In this way, the GCKS is not
required to maintaining a record of which SID values it had
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
previously allocated to each group sender. More importantly,
since the GCKS cannot reliably detect whether the group sender
had sent data on the current group Data-Security SAs it does not
know what Data-Security counter-mode nonce values that a group
sender has used. By distributing new SID values, the key server
ensures that each time a conforming group sender installs a Data-
Security SA it will use a unique set of counter-based mode
nonces.
5. When the SID-counter maintained by the GCKS reaches its final SID
value, no more SID values can be distributed. Before
distributing any new SID values, the GCKS MUST exclude all group
members from the group as described in Section 2.4.3. This will
result in the group members performing re-registration, during
which they will receive new Data-Security SAs and group senders
will additionally receive new SID values. The new SID values can
safely be used because they are only used with the new Data-
Security SAs.
2.5.2. GM Usage of SIDs
A GM applies the SID to Data-Security SA as follows.
o The most significant bits NUMBER_OF_SID_BITS of the IV are taken
to be the SID field of the IV.
o The SID is placed in the least significant bits of the SID field,
where any unused most significant bits are set to zero. If the
SID value doesn't fit into the NUMBER_OF_SID_BITS bits, then the
GM MUST treat this as a fatal error and re-register to the group.
3. Group Key Management and Access Control
Through the G-IKEv2 rekey, G-IKEv2 supports algorithms such as
Logical Key Hierarchy (LKH) that have the property of denying access
to a new group key by a member removed from the group (forward access
control) and to an old group key by a member added to the group
(backward access control). An unrelated notion to PFS, "forward
access control" and "backward access control" have been called
"perfect forward security" and "perfect backward security" in the
literature [RFC2627].
Group management algorithms providing forward and backward access
control other than LKH have been proposed in the literature,
including OFT [OFT] and Subset Difference [NNL]. These algorithms
could be used with G-IKEv2, but are not specified as a part of this
document.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
The Group Key Management Method transform from the GSA policy
specifies how members of the group obtain group keys. This document
specifies a single method for the group key management - Wrapped Key
Download. This method assumes that all group keys are sent to the
GMs by the GCKS encrypted with some other keys, called Key Wrap Keys
(KWK).
3.1. Key Wrap Keys
Every GM always knows at least one KWK - the KWK that is associated
with the IKE SA or multicast Rekey SA the wrapped keys are sent over.
In this document it is called default KWK and is denoted as GSK_w.
The GCKS may also send other keys to GMs that will be used as Key
Wrap Keys for the purpose of building key hierarchy. Each KWK is
associated with an encryption algorithm from the Encryption Algorithm
transform used for the SA the key is sent over. The size of a KWK
MUST be of the size of the key for this Encryption Algorithm
transform (taking into consideration the Key Length attribute for
this transform if present). This association persists even if the
key is used later in the context of another SA with possibly
different Encryption Algorithm transform.
To have an ability to provide forward access control the GCKS
provides each GM with a personal key at the time of registration.
Besides, several intermediate keys that form a key hierarchy and are
shared among several GMs may be provided by the GCKS.
3.1.1. Default Key Wrap Key
The default KWK (GSK_w) is only used in the context of a single IKE
SA. Every IKE SA (unicast IKE SA or multicast Rekey SA) will have
its own GSK_w. The GSK_w is used with the algorithm from the
Encryption Algorithm transform for the SA the GSK_w is used in the
context of. The size of GSK_w MUST be of the key size of this
Encryption Algorithm transform (taking into consideration the Key
Length attribute for this transform if present).
For the unicast IKE SA (used for the GM registration and for the
GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchanges, if they are take place) the GSK_w is
computed as follows:
GSK_w = prf+(SK_d, "Key Wrap for G-IKEv2")
where the string "Key Wrap for G-IKEv2" is 20 ASCII characters
without null termination.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
For the multicast Rekey SA the GSK_w is provided along with other SA
keys as defined in Section 3.4.
3.2. GCKS Key Management Semantics
Wrapped Key Download method allows the GCKS to employ various key
management methods
o A simple key management methods - when the GCKS always sends group
SA keys encrypted with the GSK_w.
o An LKH key management method - when the GCKS provides each GM with
an individual key at the time of the GM registration (encrypted
with GSK_w). Then the GCKS forms an hierarchy of keys so that the
group SA keys are encrypted with other keys which are encrypted
with other keys and so on, tracing back to the individual GMs'
keys.
Other key policies may also be employed by the GCKS.
3.2.1. Forward Access Control Requirements
When group membership is altered using a group management algorithm
new Data-Security SAs and their associated keys are usually also
needed. New Data-Security SAs and keys ensure that members who were
denied access can no longer participate in the group.
If forward access control is a desired property of the group, new TEK
policy and the associated keys MUST NOT be included in a G-IKEv2
rekey message which changes group membership. This is required
because the GSA TEK policy and the associated keys are not protected
with the new KEK. A second G-IKEv2 rekey message can deliver the new
GSA TEKS and their associated keys because it will be protected with
the new KEK, and thus will not be visible to the members who were
denied access.
If forward access control policy for the group includes keeping group
policy changes from members that are denied access to the group, then
two sequential G-IKEv2 rekey messages changing the group KEK MUST be
sent by the GCKS. The first G-IKEv2 rekey message creates a new KEK
for the group. Group members, which are denied access, will not be
able to access the new KEK, but will see the group policy since the
G-IKEv2 rekey message is protected under the current KEK. A
subsequent G-IKEv2 rekey message containing the changed group policy
and again changing the KEK allows complete forward access control. A
G-IKEv2 rekey message MUST NOT change the policy without creating a
new KEK.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
If other methods of using LKH or other group management algorithms
are added to G-IKEv2, those methods MAY remove the above restrictions
requiring multiple G-IKEv2 rekey messages, providing those methods
specify how the forward access control policy is maintained within a
single G-IKEv2 rekey message.
3.3. GM Key Management Semantics
This specification defines a GM Key Management semantics in such a
way, that it doesn't depend on the key management method employed by
the GCKS. This allows having all the complexity of key management in
the GCKS, which is free to implement various key management methods,
such as direct transmitting of group SA keys or using some kind of
key hierarchy (e.g. LKH). For all these policies the GM behavior is
the same.
Each key that a GM receives in G-IKEv2 is identified by a 32-bit
number called Key ID. Zero Key ID has a special meaning - it always
contains keying material from which the keys for protecting Data-
Security SAs and Rekey SA are taken.
All keys in G-IKEv2 are transmitted in encrypted form, as specified
in Section 4.5.1. This format includes a Key ID (ID of a key that is
encrypted) and a KWK ID (ID of a key that was used to encrypt this
key). Keys may be encrypted either with default KWK (GSK_w) or with
other keys, which the GM has received in the WRAP_KEY attributes. If
a key was encrypted with GSK_w, then the KWK ID field is set to zero,
otherwise the KWK ID field identifies the key used for encryption.
When a GM receives a message from the GCKS installing new Data-
Security or Rekey SA, it will contain a KD payload with an SA_KEY
attribute containing keying material for this SA. For a Data-
Security SA exactly one SA_KEY attribute will be present with both
Key ID and KWK ID fields set to zero. This means that the default
KWK (GSK_w) should be used to extract this keying material.
For a multicast Rekey SA multiple SA_KEY attributes may be present
depending on the key management method employed by the GCKS. If
multiple SA_KEY attributes are present then all of them MUST contain
the same keying material encrypted using different KWKs. The GM in
general is unaware of the GCKS's key management method and can always
use the same procedure to get the keys. In particular, the GM's task
is to find a way to decrypt at least one of the SA_KEY attributes
using either the GSK_w or the keys from the WRAP_KEY attributes that
are present in the same message or were receives in previous
messages.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
We will use the term "Key Path" to describe an ordered sequence of
keys where each subsequent key was used to encrypt the previous one.
The GM keeps its own Key Path (called Working Key Path) in the memory
associated with each group it is registered to and updates it when
needed. When the GSA_REKEY message is received the GM processes the
received SA_KEY attributes one by one trying to construct a new key
path that starts from this attributes and ends with any key in the
Working Key Path or with the default KWK (GSK_w).
In the simplest case the SA_KEY attribute is encrypted with GSK_w so
that the new Key Path is empty. If more complex key management
methods are used then a Key Path will contain intermediate keys from
the WRAP_KEY attributes received by a GM so far starting from its
registration to the group. If the GM is able to construct a new Key
Path using intermediate keys it has, then it is able to decrypt the
SA_KEY attribute and use its content to form new SA keys. If it is
unable to build a new Key Path, then in means that the GM is excluded
from the group.
Depending on the new Key Path the GM should do the following actions
to be prepared for future key updates:
o If the new Key Path is empty then no actions are needed. This may
happen if no WRAP_KEY attributes from the received message were
used.
o If the new Key Path is non-empty and it ends with the default KWK
(GSK_w), then the whole new Key Path is stored by the GM as the
GM's Working Key Path. This situation may only happen at the time
the GM is registering to the group, when the GCKS is providing it
with its personal key and the other keys from the key tree that
are needed for this GM. These keys form an initial Working Key
Path for this GM.
o In all other cases the new Key Path will end at some intermediate
key from the GM's current Working Key Path. In this case the new
Key Path is constructed by replacing a part of the GM's current
Working Key Path from the beginning and up to (but not including)
the key that the GM has used to decrypt the last key in the new
Key Path.
Appendix A contains an example of how this algorithm works in case of
LKH key management method.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
3.4. SA Keys
Keys used for Data-Security SAs or Rekey SA (called here SA keys) are
downloaded to GMs in the form of keying material. The keys for each
algorithm employed in an SA are taken from this keying material as if
they were concatenated to form it.
For a Data-Security SA the keys are taken in accordance to the third
bullet from Section 2.17 of [RFC7296]. In particular, for the ESP
and AH SAs the encryption key (if any) MUST be taken from the first
bits of the keying material and the integrity key (if any) MUST be
taken from the remaining bits.
For a Rekey SA the following keys are taken from the keying material:
GSK_e | GSK_a | GSK_w = KEYMAT
where GSK_e and GSK_a are the keys used for the Encryption Algorithm
and the Integrity Algorithm transforms for the corresponding SA and
GSK_w is a default KWK for this SA. Note, that GSK_w is also used
with the Encryption Algorithm transform as well as GSK_e. If an AEAD
algorithm is used for encryption, then SK_a key will not be used (GM
can use the formula above assuming the length of SK_a is zero).
4. Header and Payload Formats
The G-IKEv2 is an IKEv2 extension and thus inherits its wire format
for data structures. However, the processing of some payloads are
different and several new payloads are defined: Group Identification
(IDg), Group Security Association (GSA) Key Download (KD). New
exchange types GSA_AUTH, GSA_REGISTRATION, GSA_REKEY and
GSA_INBAND_REKEY are also added.
This section describes new payloads and the differences in processing
of existing IKEv2 payloads.
4.1. G-IKEv2 Header
G-IKEv2 uses the same IKE header format as specified in [RFC7296]
section 3.1. Major Version is 2 and Minor Version is 0 as in IKEv2.
IKE SA Initiator's SPI, IKE SA Responder's SPI, Flags, Message ID,
and Length are as specified in [RFC7296].
4.2. Group Identification Payload
The Group Identification (IDg) payload allows the group member to
indicate which group it wants to join. The payload is constructed by
using the IKEv2 Identification Payload (section 3.5 of [RFC7296]).
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
ID type ID_KEY_ID MUST be supported. ID types ID_IPV4_ADDR, ID_FQDN,
ID_RFC822_ADDR, ID_IPV6_ADDR SHOULD be supported. ID types
ID_DER_ASN1_DN and ID_DER_ASN1_GN are not expected to be used. The
Payload Type for the Group Identification payload is fifty (50).
4.3. Security Association - GM Supported Transforms Payload
The Security Association - GM Supported Transforms Payload (SAg)
payload declares which Transforms a GM is willing to accept. The
payload is constructed using the format of the IKEv2 Security
Association payload (section 3.3 of [RFC7296]). The Payload Type for
SAg is identical to the SA Payload Type - thirty-three (33).
4.4. Group Security Association Payload
The Group Security Association (GSA) payload is used by the GCKS to
assert security attributes for both Rekey SA and Data-security SAs.
The Payload Type for the Group Security Association payload is fifty-
one (51).
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Next Payload |C| RESERVED | Payload Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ <Group Policies> ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 14: GSA Payload Format
The Security Association Payload fields are defined as follows:
o Next Payload, C, RESERVED, Payload Length fields comprise the
IKEv2 Generic Payload Header and are defined in Section 3.2. of
[RFC7296].
o Group Policies (variable) - A set of group policies for the group.
4.4.1. Group Policies
Croup policies are comprised of two types of policy - Group SA (GSA)
policy and Group Associated (GA) policy. GSA policy defines
parameters for the Security Association for the group. Depending on
the employed security protocol GSA policies may further be classified
as Rekey SA policy (GSA KEK) and Data-Security SA policy (GSA TEK).
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
GSA payload may contain zero or one GSA KEK policy, zero or more GSA
TEK policies, and zero or one GA policy, where either one GSA KEK or
GSA TEK policy MUST be present.
This latitude allows various group policies to be accommodated. For
example if the group policy does not require the use of a Rekey SA,
the GCKS would not need to send a GSA KEK policy to the group member
since all SA updates would be performed using the GSA_INBAND_REKEY
exchange via the unicast IKE SA. Alternatively, group policy might
use a Rekey SA but choose to download a KEK to the group member only
as part of the unicast IKE SA. Therefore, the GSA KEK policy would
not be necessary as part of the GSA_REKEY message.
Specifying multiple GSA TEKs allows multiple related data streams
(e.g., video, audio, and text) to be associated with a session, but
each protected with an individual security association policy.
A GAP allows for the distribution of group-wise policy, such as
instructions for when to activate and de-activate SAs.
Policies are distributed in substructures to the GSA payload. The
format of the substructures is defined below in Section 4.4.2 (for
GSA policy) and in Section 4.4.3 (for GA policy). The first octet of
the substructure unambiguously determines its type - it is zero for
GAP and non-zero (actually, it is a security protocol ID) for GSA
policies.
4.4.2. Group Security Association Policy Substructure
The GSA policy substructure contains parameters for the SA used with
this group. Depending on the security protocol the SA is either a
Rekey SA or a Data-Security SA (ESP and AH). It is NOT RECOMMENDED
that the GCKS distribute both ESP and AH policies for the same set of
Traffic Selectors.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Protocol | SPI Size | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ SPI ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Source Traffic Selector ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Destination Traffic Selector ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ <GSA Transforms> ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ <GSA Attributes> ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 15: GSA Policy Substructure Format
The GSA policy fields are defined as follows:
o Protocol (1 octet) - Identifies the security protocol for this
group SA. The values are defined in the IKEv2 Security Protocol
Identifiers in [IKEV2-IANA]. The valid values for this field are:
<TBA> (GIKE_REKEY) for Rekey SA and 2 (AH) or 3 (ESP) for Data-
Security SAs.
o SPI Size (1 octet) - Size of Security Parameter Index (SPI) for
the SA. SPI size depends on the SA protocol. For GIKE_REKEY it
is 16 octets, while for AH and ESP it is 4 octets.
o Length (2 octets, unsigned integer) - Length of this substructure
including the header.
o SPI (variable) - Security Parameter Index for the group SA. The
size of this field is determined by the SPI Size field. As
described above, these SPIs are assigned by the GCKS. In case of
GIKE_REKEY the SPI must be the IKEv2 Header SPI pair where the
first 8 octets become the "Initiator's SPI" field in the G-IKEv2
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
rekey message IKEv2 HDR, and the second 8 octets become the
"Responder's SPI" in the same HDR. When selecting SPI the GCKS
MUST make sure that the sole first 8 octets (corresponding to
"Initiator's SPI" field in the IKEv2 header) uniquely identify the
Rekey SA.
o Source & Destination Traffic Selectors - (variable) -
Substructures describing the source and destination of the network
identities. The format for these substructures is defined in
IKEv2 [RFC7296], section 3.13.1. For the Rekey SA (with protocol
GIKE_REKEY) the destination traffic selectors MUST define a single
multicast IP address, IP protocol and port the GSA_REKEY messages
will be destined to. The source traffic selector in this case
MUST either define a single IP address, IP protocol and port the
GSA_REKEY messages will be originated from or be a wildcard
selector. For the Data-Security (AH and ESP) SAs the destination
traffic selectors SHOULD define a single multicast IP address.
The source traffic selector in this case SHOULD define a single IP
address or be a wildcard selector. IP protocol and ports define
the characteristics of traffic protected by this Data-Security SA.
o GSA Transforms (variable) - A list of Transform Substructures
specifies the policy information for the SA. The format is
defined in IKEv2 [RFC7296], section 3.3.2. The Last Substruc
value in each Transform Substructure will be set to 3 except for
the last one in the list, which is set to 0. Section 4.4.2.1
describes using IKEv2 transforms in GSA policy substructure.
o GSA Attributes (variable) - Contains policy attributes associated
with the group SA. The following sections describe the possible
attributes. Any or all attributes may be optional, depending on
the protocol and the group policy. Section 4.4.2.2 defines
attributes used in GSA policy substructure.
4.4.2.1. GSA Transforms
GSA policy is defined by means of transforms in the GSA policy
substructure. For this purpose the transforms defined in [RFC7296]
are used. In addition, new transform types are defined for using in
G-IKEv2: Authentication Method (AUTH) and Group Key Management Method
(GKM), see Section 8.
Valid Transform Types depend on the SA protocol and are summarized in
the table below.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
Protocol Mandatory Types Optional Types
------------------------------------------------------------
GIKE_REKEY ENCR, INTEG*, PRF, AUTH**, GKM**
ESP ENCR INTEG, ESN
AH INTEG ESN
Figure 16: Valid Transform Types
(*) If AEAD encryption algorithm is used, then INTEG transform MUST
NOT be specified, otherwise it MUST be specified.
(**) May only appear at the time of a GM registration, (in the
GSA_aUTH and GSA_REGISTRATION exchanges).
4.4.2.1.1. Authentication Method Transform
The Authentication Method (AUTH) transform is used in the GIKE_REKEY
policy to convey information of how GCKS will authenticate the
GSA_REKEY messages. This values are from the IKEv2 Authentication
Method registry [IKEV2-IANA]. Note, that this registry defines only
values in a range 0-255, so even that Transform ID field in the
Transform substructure allows for 65536 possible values, in case of
the Authentication Method transform the values 256-65535 MUST NOT
appear.
Among the currently defined authentication methods in the IKEv2
Authentication Method registry, only the following are allowed to be
used in the Authentication Method transform: Shared Key Message
Integrity Code, NULL Authentication and Digital Signature. Other
currently defined authentication methods MUST NOT be used. The
following semantics is associated with each of the allowed methods.
Shared Key Message Integrity Code - GCKS will authenticates the
GSA_REKEY messages by means of shared secret. In this case the
GCKS MUST include the AUTH_KEY attribute containing the shared key
into the KD payload at the time the GM is registered to the group.
NULL Authentication - No additional authentication of the
GSA_REKEY messages will be provided by the GCKS besides the
ability for the GMs to correctly decrypt them and verify their
ICV. In this case the GCKS MUST NOT include the AUTH_KEY
attribute into the KD payload. Additionally, the AUTH payload
MUST NOT be included in the GIKE_REKEY messages.
Digital Signature - Digital signatures will be used by the GCKS to
authenticate the GSA_REKEY messages. In this case the GCKS MUST
include the AUTH_KEY attribute containing the public key into the
KD payload at the time the GM is registered to the group. To
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
specify the details of the signature algorithm a new attribute
Algorithm Identifier (<TBA by IANA>) is defined. This attribute
contains DER-encoded ASN.1 object AlgorithmIdentifier, which would
specify the signature algorithm and the hash function that the
GCKS will use for authentication. The AlgorithmIdentifier object
is defined in section 4.1.1.2 of [RFC5280], see also [RFC7427] for
the list of common AlgorithmIdentifier values used in IKEv2. In
case of using digital signature the GCKS MUST include the
Algorithm Identifier attribute in the Authentication Method
transform.
The authentication method MUST NOT change as a result of rekey
operations. This means that the Authentication Method transform may
not appear in the rekey messages, it may only appear in the
registration exchange (either GSA_AUTH or GSA_REGISTRATION).
The type of the Authentication Method Transform is <TBA by IANA>.
4.4.2.1.2. Group Key Management Method Transform
The Group Key Management Method (GKM) transform is used in the
GIKE_REKEY policy to convey information of how GCKS will manage the
group keys to provide forward and backward access control (i.e., used
to exclude group members). Possible key management methods are
defined in a new IKEv2 registry "Transform Type <TBA> - Group Key
Management Methods" (see Section 8). This document defines one
values for this registry:
Wrapped Key Download (<TBA by IANA>) - Keys are downloaded by GCKS
to the GMs in encrypted form. This algorithm may provide forward
and backward access control if some form of key hierarchy is used
and each GM is provided with a personal key at the time of
registration. Otherwise no access control is provided.
The group key management method MUST NOT change as a result of rekey
operations. This means that the Group Key Management Method
transform may not appear in the rekey messages, it may only appear in
the registration exchange (either GSA_AUTH or GSA_REGISTRATION).
The type of the Group Key Management Method transform is <TBA by
IANA>.
4.4.2.1.3. Extended Sequence Number Transform
Extended Sequence Number (ESN) Transform is defined in [RFC7296] to
allow using 64-bit sequence numbers in ESP and AH. Since both AH
[RFC4302] and ESP [RFC4303] are defined so, that high-order 32 bits
of extended sequence numbers are never transmitted, it makes using
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
ESN in multicast Data-Security SAs problematic, because GMs that join
group long after it is created will have to somehow learn the current
high order 32 bits of ESN for each sender in the group. The
algorithm for doing this described in [RFC4302] and [RFC4303] is
resource-consuming. For this reason extended sequence numbers SHOULD
NOT be used for multicast Data-Security SAs and thus the ESN
Transform SHOULD NOT be included in the GSA Payload.
4.4.2.2. GSA Attributes
GSA attributes are generally used to provide GMs with additional
parameters for the GSA policy. Unlike security parameters
distributed via transforms, which are expected not to change over
time (unless policy changes), the parameters distributed via GSA
attributes may depend on the time the provision takes place, on the
existence of others group SAs or on other conditions.
This document creates a new IKEv2 IANA registry for the types of the
GSA attributes which is initially filled as described in Section 8.
In particular, the following attributes are initially added.
GSA Attributes Value Type Multiple Protocol
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reserved 0
GSA_KEY_LIFETIME 1 V N GIKE_REKEY, AH, ESP
GSA_INITIAL_MESSAGE_ID 2 V N GIKE_REKEY
GSA_NEXT_SPI 3 V Y GIKE_REKEY, AH, ESP
The attributes must follow the format defined in the IKEv2 [RFC7296]
section 3.3.5. In the table, attributes that are defined as TV are
marked as Basic (B); attributes that are defined as TLV are marked as
Variable (V).
4.4.2.2.1. GSA_KEY_LIFETIME Attribute
The GSA_KEY_LIFETIME attribute (1) specifies the maximum time for
which the SA is valid. The value is a 4 octet unsigned integer in a
network byte order, specifying a valid time period in seconds. A
single attribute of this type MUST be included into any GSA policy
substructure.
When the lifetime expires, the group security association and all
associated keys MUST be deleted. The GCKS may delete the SA at any
time before the end of the validity period.
This attribute SHOULD NOT be used if inband rekeying (via the
GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchange) is employed by the GCKS for the GM.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
4.4.2.2.2. GSA_INITIAL_MESSAGE_ID Attribute
The GSA_INITIAL_MESSAGE_ID attribute (2) defines the initial Message
ID to be used by the GCKS in the GSA_REKEY messages. The Message ID
is a 4 octet unsigned integer in network byte order.
A single attribute of this type MUST be included into the GSA KEK
policy substructure if the initial Message ID of the Rekey SA is non-
zero. Note, that it is always the case if GMs join the group after
some multicast rekey operations have already taken place, so in these
cases this attribute will be included into the GSA policy at the time
of GMs' registration.
This attribute MUST NOT be used if inband rekeying (via the
GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchange) is employed by the GCKS for the GM.
4.4.2.2.3. GSA_NEXT_SPI Attribute
The optional GSA_NEXT_SPI attribute (3) contains SPI that the GCKS
reserved for the next Rekey SA or Data-Security SAs replacing the
current ones. The length of the attribute data is determined by the
SPI Size field in the GSA Policy substructure the attribute resides
in (see Section 4.4.2), and the attribute data contains SPI as it
would appear on the network. Multiple attributes of this type MAY be
included, meaning that any of the supplied SPIs can be used in the
replacement group SA.
The GM MAY store these values and if later the GM starts receiving
messages with one of these SPIs without seeing a rekey message over
the current Rekey SA, this may be used as an indication, that the
rekey message got lost on its way to this GM. In this case the GM
SHOULD re-register to the group.
Note, that this method of detecting lost rekey messages can only be
used by group receivers. Additionally there is no point to include
this attribute in the GSA_INBAND_REKEY messages, since they use
reliable transport. Note also, that the GCKS is free to forget its
promises and not to use the SPIs it sent in the GSA_NEXT_SPI
attributes before (e.g. in case of the GCKS is rebooted), so the GM
must only treat these information as a "best effort" made by the GCKS
to prepare for future rekeys.
This attribute MUST NOT be used if inband rekeying (via the
GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchange) is employed by the GCKS for the GM.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
4.4.3. Group Associated Policy Substructure
Group specific policy that does not belong to any SA policy can be
distributed to all group member using Group Associated Policy (GAP)
substructure.
The GAP substructure is defined as follows:
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Protocol | RESERVED | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ <GAP Attributes> ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 17: GAP Substructure Format
The GAP substructure fields are defined as follows:
o Protocol (1 octet) - MUST be zero. This value is reserved in
Section 8 and is never used for any security protocol, so it is
used here to indicate that this substructure contains policy not
related to any specific protocol.
o RESERVED ( octet) - MUST be zero on transmission, MUST be ignored
on receipt.
o Length (2 octets, unsigned integer) - Length of this substructure
including the header.
o GAP Attributes (variable) - Contains policy attributes associated
with no specific SA. The following sections describe possible
attributes. Any or all attributes may be optional, depending on
the group policy.
This document creates a new IKEv2 IANA registry for the types of the
GAP attributes which is initially filled as described in Section 8.
In particular, the following attributes are initially added.
GAP Attributes Value Type Multiple
----------------------------------------------------
Reserved 0
GAP_ATD 1 B N
GAP_DTD 2 B N
GAP_SID_BITS 3 B N
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
The attributes must follow the format defined in the IKEv2 [RFC7296]
section 3.3.5. In the table, attributes that are defined as TV are
marked as Basic (B); attributes that are defined as TLV are marked as
Variable (V).
4.4.3.1. GAP_ATD And GAP_DTD Attributes
Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5374] specifies a key rollover method that
requires two values be provided to group members - Activation Time
Delay (ATD) and Deactivation Time Delay (DTD).
The GAP_ATD attribute (1) allows a GCKS to set the Activation Time
Delay for Data-Security SAs of the group. The ATD defines how long
active members of the group (those who sends traffic) should wait
after receiving new SAs before staring sending traffic over them.
Note, that to achieve smooth rollover passive members of the group
should activate the SAs immediately once they receive them.
The GAP_DTD attribute (2) allows the GCKS to set the Deactivation
Time Delay for previously distributed SAs. The DTD defines how long
after receiving a request to delete Data-Security SAs passive group
members should wait before actually deleting them. Note that active
members of the group should stop sending traffic over these old SAs
once new replacement SAs are activated (after time specified in the
GAP_ATD attribute).
The GAP_ATD and GAP_DTD attributes contain 16 bit unsigned integer in
a network byte order, specifying the delay in seconds. These
attributes are OPTIONAL. If one of them or both are not sent by the
GCKS, the GMs should use default values for activation and
deactivation time delays.
4.4.3.2. GAP_SID_BITS Attribute
The GAP_SID_BITS attribute (3) declares how many bits of the cipher
nonce are taken to represent an SID value. The bits are applied as
the most significant bits of the IV, as shown in Figure 1 of
[RFC6054] and specified in Section 2.5.2. Guidance for a GCKS
choosing the NUMBER_OF_SID_BITS is provided in Section 3 of
[RFC6054]. This value is applied to each SID value distributed in
the KD payload.
The GCKS MUST include this attribute if there are more than one
sender in the group and any of the Data-Security SAs use counter-
based cipher mode. The number of SID bits is represented as 16 bit
unsigned integer in network byte order.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
4.5. Key Download Payload
The Key Download (KD) payload contains the group keys for the SAs
specified in the GSA Payload. The Payload Type for the Key Download
payload is fifty-two (52).
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Next Payload |C| RESERVED | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ <Key Packets> ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 18: Key Download Payload Format
The Key Download payload fields are defined as follows:
o Next Payload, C, RESERVED, Payload Length fields comprise the
IKEv2 Generic Payload Header and are defined in Section 3.2. of
[RFC7296].
o Key Packets (variable) - Contains Group Key Packet and Member Key
Packet substructures. Each Key Packet contains keys for a single
group rekey or Data-Security SA or a keys and security parameters
for a GM.
Two types of Key Packets are used - Group Key Packet and Member Key
Packet.
4.5.1. Wrapped Key Format
The symmetric keys in G-IKEv2 are never sent in clear. They are
always encrypted with other keys using the format called Wrapped Key
that is shown below (Figure 19).
The keys are encrypted using algorithm that is used to encrypt the
message the keys are sent in. It means, that in case of unicast IKE
SA (used for GMs registration and rekeying using GSA_INBAND_REKEY)
the encryption algorithm will be the one negotiated during the IKE SA
establishment, while for a GSA_REKEY message the algorithm will be
provided by the GCKS in the Encryption Algorithm transform in the GSA
payload when this multicast SA was being established.
If AEAD mode is used for encryption, then for the purpose of key
encryption the authentication tag MUST NOT be used (both not
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
calculated and not verified), since the G-IKEv2 provides
authentication of all its messages. In addition there is no AAD in
this case. If encryption algorithm requires padding, then the
encrypted key MUST be padded before encryption to have the required
size. If the encryption algorithm doesn't define the padding
content, then the following scheme SHOULD be used: the Padding bytes
are initialized with a series of (unsigned, 1-byte) integer values.
The first padding byte appended to the plaintext is numbered 1, with
subsequent padding bytes making up a monotonically increasing
sequence: 1, 2, 3, .... The length of the padding is not transmitted
and is implicitly determined, since the length of the key is known.
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Key ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| KWK ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ IV ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Encrypted Key ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 19: Wrapped Key Format
The Wrapped Key fields are defined as follows:
o Key ID (4 octets) - ID of the encrypted key. The value zero means
that the encrypted key contains SA keys (in the form of keying
material, see Section 3.4)), otherwise it contains some
intermediate key.
o KWK ID (4 octets) - ID of the key that was used to encrypt key
with specified Key ID. The value zero means that the default KWK
was used to encrypt the key, otherwise some intermediate key was
used.
o IV (variable) - Initialization Vector used for encryption. The
size and the content of IV is defined by the employed encryption
transform.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
o Encrypted Key (variable) - The encrypted key bits. These bits may
comprise either a single encrypted key or a result of encryption
of a concatenation of keys (key material) for several algorithms.
4.5.2. Group Key Packet Substructure
Group Key Packet substructure contains SA key information. This key
information is associated with some group SAs: either with Data-
Security SAs or with group Rekey SA.
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Protocol | SPI Size | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ SPI ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ <Group Key Packet Attributes> ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 20: Group Key Packet Substructure Format
o Protocol (1 octet) - Identifies the security protocol for this key
packet. The values are defined in the IKEv2 Security Protocol
Identifiers in [IKEV2-IANA]. The valid values for this field are:
<TBA> (GIKE_REKEY) for KEK Key packet and 2 (AH) or 3 (ESP) for
TEK key packet.
o SPI Size (1 octet) - Size of Security Parameter Index (SPI) for
the corresponding SA. SPI size depends on the security protocol.
For GIKE_REKEY it is 16 octets, while for AH and ESP it is 4
octets.
o Length (2 octets, unsigned integer) - Length of this substructure
including the header.
o SPI (variable) - Security Parameter Index for the corresponding
SA. The size of this field is determined by the SPI Size field.
In case of GIKE_REKEY the SPI must be the IKEv2 Header SPI pair
where the first 8 octets become the "Initiator's SPI" field in the
G-IKEv2 rekey message IKEv2 HDR, and the second 8 octets become
the "Responder's SPI" in the same HDR. When selecting SPI the
GCKS MUST make sure that the sole first 8 octets (corresponding to
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
"Initiator's SPI" field in the IKEv2 header) uniquely identify the
Rekey SA.
o Group Key Packet Attributes (variable length) - Contains Key
information for the corresponding SA.
This document creates a new IKEv2 IANA registry for the types of the
Group Key Packet attributes which is initially filled as described in
Section 8. In particular, the following attributes are initially
added.
Group Key Packet
Attributes Value Type Multiple Protocol
----------------------------------------------------------
Reserved 0
SA_KEY 1 V N/Y* GIKE_REKEY,
N AH, ESP
(*) Multiple SA_KEY attributes may only appear for the GIKE_REKEY
protocol in the GSA_REKEY exchange if the GCKS uses the Group Key
Management method that allows excluding GMs from the group (like
LKH).
The attributes must follow the format defined in the IKEv2 [RFC7296]
section 3.3.5. In the table, attributes that are defined as TV are
marked as Basic (B); attributes that are defined as TLV are marked as
Variable (V).
4.5.2.1. SA_KEY Attribute
The SA_KEY attribute (1) contains a keying material for the
corresponding SA. The content of the attribute is formatted
according to Section 4.5.1 with a precondition that the Key ID field
MUST always be zero. The size of the keying material MUST be equal
to the total size of the keys needed to be taken from this keying
material (see Section 3.4) for the corresponding SA.
If the Key Packet is for a Data-Security SA (AH or ESP protocols),
then exactly one SA_KEY attribute MUST be present with both Key ID
and KWK ID fields set to zero.
If the Key Packet is for a Rekey SA (GIKE_REKEY protocol), then in
the GSA_AUTH, GSA_REGISTRATION and GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchanges exactly
one SA_KEY attribute MUST be present. In the GSA_REKEY exchange at
least one SA_KEY attribute MUST be present, and more attributes MAY
be present (depending on the key management method employed by the
GCKS).
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
4.5.3. Member Key Packet Substructure
The Member Key Packet substructure contains keys and other parameters
that are specific for a member of the group and are not associated
with any particular group SA.
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Protocol | RESERVED | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ <Member Key Packet Attributes> ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 21: Member Key Packet Substructure Format
The Member Key Packet substructure fields are defined as follows:
o Protocol (1 octet) - MUST be zero. This value is reserved in
Section 8 and is never used for any security protocol, so it is
used here to indicate that this Key Packet is not associated with
any particular SA.
o RESERVED ( octet) - MUST be zero on transmission, MUST be ignored
on receipt.
o Length (2 octets, unsigned integer) - Length of this substructure
including the header.
o Member Key Packet Attributes (variable length) - Contains Key
information and other parameters exclusively for a particular
member of the group.
Member Key Packet substructure contains sensitive information for a
single GM, for this reason it MUST NOT be sent in GSA_REKEY messages
and MUST only be sent via unicast SA at the time the GM registers to
the group (in either GSA_AUTH or GSA_REGISTRATION exchanges).
This document creates a new IKEv2 IANA registry for the types of the
Member Key Packet attributes which is initially filled as described
in Section 8. In particular, the following attributes are initially
added.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
Member Key Packet
Attributes Value Type Multiple
------------------------------------------------
Reserved 0
WRAP_KEY 1 V Y
AUTH_KEY 2 V N
GM_SID 3 V Y
The attributes must follow the format defined in the IKEv2 [RFC7296]
section 3.3.5. In the table, attributes that are defined as TV are
marked as Basic (B); attributes that are defined as TLV are marked as
Variable (V).
4.5.3.1. WRAP_KEY Attribute
The WRAP_KEY attribute (1) contains a key that is used to encrypt
other keys. One or more these attributes are sent to GMs if the GCKS
key management method relies on some key hierarchy (e.g. LKH). This
attribute MUST NOT be used if inband rekeying (via the
GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchange) is employed by the GCKS for the GM.
The content of the attribute has a format defined in Section 4.5.1
with a precondition that the Key ID field MUST NOT be zero. The
algorithm associated with the key is from the Encryption Transform
for the SA the WRAP_KEY attributes was sent in. The size of the key
MUST be equal to the key size for this algorithm.
Multiple instances of the WRAP_KEY attributes MAY be present in the
key packet.
4.5.3.2. AUTH_KEY Attribute
The AUTH_KEY attribute (2) contains the key that is used to
authenticate the GSA_REKEY messages. The content of the attribute
depends on the authentication method the GCKS specified in the
Authentication Method transform in the GSA payload.
o If a shared secret is used for the GSA_REKEY messages
authentication then the content of the AUTH_KEY attribute is the
shared secret that MUST be represented in the form of Wrapped Key
(see Section 4.5.1) with zero KWK ID. The Key ID in this case is
arbitrary and MUST be ignored by the GM.
o If digital signatures are used for the GSA_REKEY messages
authentication then the content of the AUTH_KEY attribute is a
public key used for digital signature authentication. The public
key MUST be represented as DER-encoded ASN.1 object
SubjectPublicKeyInfo, defined in section 4.1.2.7 of [RFC5280].
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
The signature algorithm that will use this key was specified in
the Algorithm Identifier attribute of the Authentication Method
transform. The key MUST be compatible with this algorithm. An
RSA public key format is defined in [RFC8017], Section A.1. DSS
public key format is defined in [RFC3279] Section 2.3.2. For
ECDSA Public keys, use format described in [RFC5480] Section 2.
Other algorithms added to the IKEv2 Authentication Method registry
are also expected to include a format of the SubjectPublicKeyInfo
object included in the algorithm specification.
Multiple instances of the AUTH_KEY attributes MUST NOT be sent. This
attribute MUST NOT appear in the rekey operations (in the GSA_REKEY
or GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchanges).
4.5.3.3. GM_SID Attribute
The GM_SID attribute (3) is used to download one or more Sender-ID
values for the exclusive use of a group member. One or more of this
attributes MUST be sent by the GCKS if the GM informed the GCKS that
it would be a sender (by inclusion the SENDER notification to the
request) and at least one of the Data-Security SAs included in the
GSA payload uses counter-based mode of encryption.
If the GMs has requested multiple SID values in the SENDER
notification, then the GCKS SHOULD provide it with the requested
number of SIDs by sending multiple instances of the GM_SID attribute.
The GCKS MAY send fewer SIDs than requested by the GM (e.g. if it is
running out of SIDs), but it MUST NOT send more than requested.
This attribute MUST NOT appear in the rekey operations (in the
GSA_REKEY or GSA_INBAND_REKEY exchanges).
4.6. Delete Payload
Delete payload is used in G-IKEv2 when the GCKS wants to delete Data-
Security and Rekey SAs. The interpretation of the Protocol field in
the Delete payload is extended, so that zero protocol indicates
deletion of whole Group SA (i.e. all Data-Security SAs and Rekey SA).
See Section 2.4.3 for detail.
4.7. Notify Payload
G-IKEv2 uses the same Notify payload as specified in [RFC7296],
section 3.10.
There are additional Notify Message types introduced by G-IKEv2 to
communicate error conditions and status (see Section 8).
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
o INVALID_GROUP_ID (45) - error type notification that indicates
that the group ID sent during the registration process is invalid.
The Protocol ID and SPI Size fields in the Notify payload MUST be
zero. There is no data associated with this notification and the
content of the Notification Data field MUST be ignored on receipt.
o AUTHORIZATION_FAILED (46) - error type notification that is sent
in the response to a GSA_AUTH or GSA_REGISTRATION message when
authorization failed. The Protocol ID and SPI Size fields in the
Notify payload MUST be zero. There is no data associated with
this notification and the content of the Notification Data field
MUST be ignored on receipt.
o REGISTRATION_FAILED (<TBA>) - error type notification that is sent
by the GCKS when the GM registration request cannot be satisfied
for the reasons not related to this particular GM, for example if
the capacity of the group is exceeded. The Protocol ID and SPI
Size fields in the Notify payload MUST be zero. There is no data
associated with this notification and the content of the
Notification Data field MUST be ignored on receipt.
o SENDER (16429) - status type notification that is sent in the
GSA_AUTH or the GSA_REGISTRATION exchanges to indicate that the GM
intends to be sender of data traffic. The data includes a count
of how many SID values the GM desires. The count MUST be 4 octets
long and contain the big endian representation of the number of
requested SIDs. The Protocol ID and SPI Size fields in the Notify
payload MUST be zero.
o REKEY_IS_NEEDED (<TBA>) - status type notification that is sent in
the GSA_AUTH response message to indicate that the GM must perform
an immediate rekey of IKE SA to make it secure against quantum
computers and then start a registration request over. The
Protocol ID and SPI Size fields in the Notify payload MUST be
zero. There is no data associated with this notification and the
content of the Notification Data field MUST be ignored on receipt.
4.7.1. USE_TRANSPORT_MODE Notification
This specification uses USE_TRANSPORT_MODE notification defined in
section 3.10.1 of [RFC7296] to specify which mode Data-Security SAs
should be created in. The GCKS MUST include one USE_TRANSPORT_MODE
notification in a message containing the GSA payload for every Data-
Security SAs specified in this payload that is to be created in
transport mode. In other words, there must be as many these
notifications included in the message as many SAs are created in
transport mode. The Protocol ID, SPI Size and SPI fields of the
Notify Payload MUST correctly specify each such SA.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
4.8. Authentication Payload
G-IKEv2 uses the same Authentication payload as specified in
[RFC7296], section 3.8, to authenticate the rekey message. However,
if it is used in the GSA_REKEY messages the content of the payload is
computed differently, as described in Section 2.4.1.1.
5. Usigng G-IKEv2 Attributes
G-IKEv2 defines a number of attributes, that are used to convey
information from GCKS to GMs. There are some restrictions on where
and when these attributes can appear in G-IKEv2 messages, which are
defined when the attributes are introduced. For convenience these
restrictions are summarized in Table 1 (for multicast rekey
operations) and Table 2 (for inband rekey operations) below.
The following notation is used:
S A single attribute of this type must be present
M Multiple attributes of this type may be present
[] Attribute is optional
- Attribute must not be present
Note, that the restrictions are defined per a substructure
corresponding attributes are defined for and not per whole G-IKEv2
message.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
+-------------------------+--------------------+--------------------+
| Attributes | GSA_AUTH | GSA_REKEY |
| | GSA_REGISTRATION | |
+-------------------------+--------------------+--------------------+
| GSA_KEY_LIFETIME | S | S |
| | | |
| GSA_INITIAL_MESSAGE_ID | [S] | [S] |
| | | |
| GSA_NEXT_SPI | [M] | [M] |
| | | |
| GAP_ATD | [S] | [S] |
| | | |
| GAP_DTD | [S] | [S] |
| | | |
| GAP_SID_BITS | S* | - |
| | | |
| SA_KEY | S | S/[M]** |
| | | |
| WRAP_KEY | [M]** | [M]** |
| | | |
| AUTH_KEY | [S]*** | - |
| | | |
| GM_SID | S*/[M]* | - |
+-------------------------+--------------------+--------------------+
Table 1: Using attributes in G-IKEv2 exchanges when multicast rekey
is used
* The GAP_SID_BITS attribute must be present if the GCKS policy
includes at least one cipher in counter mode of operation and
the GM included the SENDER notify into the registration
request. Otherwise it must not be present. At least one
GM_SID attribute must be present in the former case (and more
may be present if the GM requested more SIDs) and no GM_SID
attributes must be present in the latter case.
** The WRAP_KEY attributes may be present if the GCKS employs key
management method that relies on key tree (like LKH).
*** The AUTH_KEY attribute must be present if the GCKS employs
authentication method other than NULL Authentication.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
+-------------------------+--------------------+--------------------+
| Attributes | GSA_AUTH | GSA_INBAND_REKEY |
| | GSA_REGISTRATION | |
+-------------------------+--------------------+--------------------+
| GSA_KEY_LIFETIME | [S] | [S] |
| | | |
| GSA_INITIAL_MESSAGE_ID | - | - |
| | | |
| GSA_NEXT_SPI | - | - |
| | | |
| GAP_ATD | [S] | [S] |
| | | |
| GAP_DTD | [S] | [S] |
| | | |
| GAP_SID_BITS | S* | - |
| | | |
| SA_KEY | S | S |
| | | |
| WRAP_KEY | - | - |
| | | |
| AUTH_KEY | - | - |
| | | |
| GM_SID | S*/[M]* | - |
+-------------------------+--------------------+--------------------+
Table 2: Using attributes in G-IKEv2 exchanges when inband rekey is
used
* The GAP_SID_BITS attribute must be present if the GCKS policy
includes at least one cipher in counter mode of operation and
the GM included the SENDER notify into the registration
request. Otherwise it must not be present. At least one
GM_SID attribute must be present in the former case (and more
may be present if the GM requested more SIDs) and no GM_SID
attributes must be present in the latter case.
6. Interaction with other IKEv2 Protocol Extensions
A number of IKEv2 extensions is defined that can be used to extend
protocol functionality. G-IKEv2 is compatible with most of them. In
particular, EAP authentication defined in [RFC7296] can be used to
establish registration IKE SA, as well as EAP-only authentication
[RFC5998] and Secure Password authentication [RFC6467]. G-IKEv2 is
compatible with and can use IKEv2 Redirect Mechanism [RFC5685] and
IKEv2 Session Resumption [RFC5723]. G-IKEv2 is also compatible with
Multiple Key Exchanges in IKEv2 framework, defined in
[I-D.ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke].
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
The above list of compatible IKEv2 extensions is not exhaustive,
however some IKEv2 extensions require special handling if used in
G-IKEv2.
6.1. Mixing Preshared Keys in IKEv2 for Post-quantum Security
G-IKEv2 can take advantage of the protection provided by Postquantum
Preshared Keys (PPK) for IKEv2 [RFC8784]. However, the use of PPK
leaves the initial IKE SA susceptible to quantum computer (QC)
attacks. Since group SA keys are protected with the default KWK
(GSK_w), which is derived from SK_d and thus cannot be broken even by
attacker tquipped with a QC, authentication of these keys relies on
authentication of IKE SA messages, which is not secure against QC
until the initial IKE SA is rekeyed. In additional, the other
content of IKE SA messages may also be visible to an attacker with a
QC. See Section 6 of [RFC8784] for details. For this reason an
alternative approach for using PPK in IKEv2 defined in
[I-D.smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt] SHOULD be used.
If the alternative approach is not supported by the peers, then the
GCKS MUST NOT send GSA and KD payloads in the GSA_AUTH response
message. Instead, the GCKS MUST return a new notification
REKEY_IS_NEEDED. Upon receiving this notification in the GSA_AUTH
response the GM MUST perform an IKE SA rekey and then initiate a new
GSA_REGISTRATION request for the same group. Below are possible
scenarios involving using PPK.
The GM starts the IKE_SA_INIT exchange requesting using PPK, and the
GCKS responds with agreement to do it, or aborts according to its
"mandatory_or_not" flag:
Initiator (Member) Responder (GCKS)
-------------------- ------------------
HDR, SAi1, KEi, Ni, N(USE_PPK) -->
<-- DR, SAr1, KEr, Nr, [CERTREQ],
N(USE_PPK)
Figure 22: IKE_SA_INIT Exchange requesting using PPK
The GM then starts the GSA_AUTH exchange with the PPK_ID; if using
PPK is not mandatory for the GM, the NO_PPK_AUTH notification is
included in the request:
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
Initiator (Member) Responder (GCKS)
-------------------- ------------------
HDR, SK{IDi, AUTH, IDg,
N(PPK_IDENTITY), N(NO_PPK_AUTH)} -->
Figure 23: GSA_AUTH Request using PPK
If the GCKS has no such PPK and using PPK is not mandatory for it and
the NO_PPK_AUTH is included, then the GCKS continues without PPK; in
this case no rekey is needed:
Initiator (Member) Responder (GCKS)
-------------------- ------------------
<-- HDR, SK{IDr, AUTH, GSA, KD}
Figure 24: GSA_AUTH Response using no PPK
If the GCKS has no such PPK and either the NO_PPK_AUTH is missing or
using PPK is mandatory for the GCKS, the GCKS aborts the exchange:
Initiator (Member) Responder (GCKS)
-------------------- ------------------
<-- HDR, SK{N(AUTHENTICATION_FAILED)}
Figure 25: GSA_AUTH Error Response
Assuming the GCKS has the proper PPK it continues with a request to
the GM to immediately perform a rekey by sending the REKEY_IS_NEEDED
notification:
Initiator (Member) Responder (GCKS)
-------------------- ------------------
<-- HDR, SK{IDr, AUTH, N(PPK_IDENTITY),
N(REKEY_IS_NEEDED) }
Figure 26: GSA_AUTH Response using PPK
The GM initiates the CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange to rekey the initial
IKE SA and then makes a new registration request for the same group
over the new IKE SA:
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 53]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
Initiator (Member) Responder (GCKS)
-------------------- ------------------
HDR, SK{SA, Ni, KEi} -->
<-- HDR, SK{SA, Nr, KEr}
HDR, SK{IDg} --->
<-- HDR, SK{GSA, KD}
Figure 27: Rekeying IKE SA followed by GSA_REGISTRATION Exchange
7. Security Considerations
7.1. GSA Registration and Secure Channel
G-IKEv2 registration exchange uses IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT protocols,
inheriting all the security considerations documented in [RFC7296]
section 5 Security Considerations, including authentication,
confidentiality, protection against man-in-the-middle, protection
against replay/reflection attacks, and denial of service protection.
The GSA_AUTH and GSA_REGISTRATION exchanges also take advantage of
those protections. In addition, G-IKEv2 brings in the capability to
authorize a particular group member regardless of whether they have
the IKEv2 credentials.
7.2. GSA Maintenance Channel
The GSA maintenance channel is cryptographically and integrity
protected using the cryptographic algorithm and key negotiated in the
GSA member registration exchanged.
7.2.1. Authentication/Authorization
The authentication key is distributed during the GM registration, and
the receiver of the rekey message uses that key to verify the message
came from the authorized GCKS. An implicit authentication can also
be used, in which case the ability of the GM to decrypt and to verify
ICV of the received message proved taht a sender of the message is a
member of the group. However, implicit authentication as well as
authentication with preshared key don't provide source origin
authentication, so the GM cannot be sure that the message came from
the GCKS. For this reason using implicit authentication and
authentication with preshared key is NOT RECOMMENDED unless in a
small group of trusted parties.
7.2.2. Confidentiality
Confidentiality is provided by distributing a confidentiality key as
part of the GSA member registration exchange.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 54]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
7.2.3. Man-in-the-Middle Attack Protection
GSA maintenance channel is integrity protected by using a digital
signature.
7.2.4. Replay/Reflection Attack Protection
The GSA_REKEY message includes a monotonically increasing sequence
number to protect against replay and reflection attacks. A group
member will recognize a replayed message by comparing the Message ID
number to that of the last received rekey message, any rekey message
containing a Message ID number less than or equal to the last
received value MUST be discarded. Implementations should keep a
record of recently received GSA rekey messages for this comparison.
8. IANA Considerations
8.1. New Registries
A new set of registries is created for G-IKEv2 on IKEv2 parameters
page [IKEV2-IANA]. The terms Reserved, Expert Review and Private Use
are to be applied as defined in [RFC8126].
This document creates a new IANA registry "Transform Type <TBA> -
Group Key Management Methods". The initial values of the new
registry are:
Value Group Key Management Method
-------------------------------------------------------
Reserved 0
Wrapped Key Download 1
Unassigned 2-1023
Private Use 1024-65535
Changes and additions to the unassigned range of this registry are by
the Expert Review Policy [RFC8126].
This document creates a new IANA registry "GSA Attributes". The
initial values of the new registry are:
GSA Attributes Value Type Multiple Protocol
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reserved 0
GSA_KEY_LIFETIME 1 V N GIKE_REKEY, AH, ESP
GSA_INITIAL_MESSAGE_ID 2 V N GIKE_REKEY
GSA_NEXT_SPI 3 V Y GIKE_REKEY, AH, ESP
Unassigned 5-16383
Private Use 16384-32767
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 55]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
Changes and additions to the unassigned range of this registry are by
the Expert Review Policy [RFC8126].
This document creates a new IANA registry "GAP Attributes". The
initial values of the new registry are:
GAP Attributes Value Type Multiple
----------------------------------------------------
Reserved 0
GAP_ATD 1 B N
GAP_DTD 2 B N
GAP_SID_BITS 3 B N
Unassigned 4-16383
Private Use 16384-32767
Changes and additions to the unassigned range of this registry are by
the Expert Review Policy [RFC8126].
This document creates a new IANA registry "Group Key Packet
Attributes". The initial values of the new registry are:
Group Key Packet
Attributes Value Type Multiple Protocol
------------------------------------------------------------
Reserved 0
SA_KEY 1 V Y GIKE_REKEY,
N AH, ESP
Unassigned 2-16383
Private Use 16384-32767
Changes and additions to the unassigned range of this registry are by
the Expert Review Policy [RFC8126].
This document creates a new IANA registry "Member Key Packet
Attributes". The initial values of the new registry are:
Member Key Packet
Attributes Value Type Multiple
------------------------------------------------
Reserved 0
WRAP_KEY 1 V Y
AUTH_KEY 2 V N
GM_SID 3 V Y
Unassigned 4-16383
Private Use 16384-32767
Changes and additions to the unassigned range of this registry are by
the Expert Review Policy [RFC8126].
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 56]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
8.2. Changes in the Existing IKEv2 Registries
This document defines new Exchange Types in the "IKEv2 Exchange
Types" registry:
Value Exchange Type
----------------------------
39 GSA_AUTH
40 GSA_REGISTRATION
41 GSA_REKEY
<TBA> GSA_INBAND_REKEY
This document defines new Payload Types in the "IKEv2 Payload Types"
registry:
Value Next Payload Type Notation
----------------------------------------------------
50 Group Identification IDg
51 Group Security Association GSA
52 Key Download KD
This document defines a new Security Protocol Identifier in the
"IKEv2 Security Protocol Identifiers" registry:
<TBA> GIKE_REKEY
This document defines new Transform Types in the "Transform Type
Values" registry and changes the "Used In" column for the existing
allocations:
Type Description Used In
---------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Encryption Algorithm (ENCR) IKE, GIKE_REKEY and ESP
2 Pseudo-random Function (PRF) IKE, GIKE_REKEY
3 Integrity Algorithm (INTEG) IKE, GIKE_REKEY, AH,
optional in ESP
4 Diffie-Hellman Group (D-H) IKE, optional in AH, ESP
5 Extended Sequence Numbers (ESN) AH and ESP
<TBA> Authentication Method (AUTH) GIKE_REKEY
<TBA> Group Key Management Method (GKM) GIKE_REKEY
This document defines a new Attribute Type in the "IKEv2 Transform
Attribute Types" registry:
Value Attribute Type Format
----------------------------------------------
<TBA> Algorithm Identifier TLV
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 57]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
This document defines new Notify Message Types in the "Notify Message
Types - Status Types" registry:
Value Notify Messages - Status Types
------------------------------------------
16429 SENDER
The Notify type with the value 16429 was allocated earlier in the
development of G-IKEv2 document with the name SENDER_REQUEST_ID.
This specification changes its name to SENDER.
This document defines new Notify Message Types in the "Notify Message
Types - Error Types" registry:
Value Notify Messages - Error Types
-----------------------------------------
45 INVALID_GROUP_ID
46 AUTHORIZATION_FAILED
<TBA> REGISTRATION_FAILED
9. Acknowledgements
The authors thank Lakshminath Dondeti and Jing Xiang for first
exploring the use of IKEv2 for group key management and providing the
basis behind the protocol. Mike Sullenberger and Amjad Inamdar were
instrumental in helping resolve many issues in several versions of
the document.
The authors are grateful to Tero Kivinen for his careful review and
valuable proposals how to improve the document.
10. Contributors
The following individuals made substantial contributions to early
versions of this memo.
Sheela Rowles
Cisco Systems
170 W. Tasman Drive
San Jose, California 95134-1706
USA
Phone: +1-408-527-7677
Email: sheela@cisco.com
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 58]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
Aldous Yeung
Cisco Systems
170 W. Tasman Drive
San Jose, California 95134-1706
USA
Phone: +1-408-853-2032
Email: cyyeung@cisco.com
Paulina Tran
Cisco Systems
170 W. Tasman Drive
San Jose, California 95134-1706
USA
Phone: +1-408-526-8902
Email: ptran@cisco.com
Yoav Nir
Dell EMC
9 Andrei Sakharov St
Haifa 3190500
Israel
Email: ynir.ietf@gmail.com
11. References
11.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4301] Kent, S. and K. Seo, "Security Architecture for the
Internet Protocol", RFC 4301, DOI 10.17487/RFC4301,
December 2005, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4301>.
[RFC4302] Kent, S., "IP Authentication Header", RFC 4302,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4302, December 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4302>.
[RFC4303] Kent, S., "IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)",
RFC 4303, DOI 10.17487/RFC4303, December 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4303>.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 59]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
[RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
(CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>.
[RFC6054] McGrew, D. and B. Weis, "Using Counter Modes with
Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) and Authentication
Header (AH) to Protect Group Traffic", RFC 6054,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6054, November 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6054>.
[RFC7296] Kaufman, C., Hoffman, P., Nir, Y., Eronen, P., and T.
Kivinen, "Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2
(IKEv2)", STD 79, RFC 7296, DOI 10.17487/RFC7296, October
2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7296>.
[RFC7427] Kivinen, T. and J. Snyder, "Signature Authentication in
the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2)", RFC 7427,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7427, January 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7427>.
[RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
11.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate]
Smyslov, V., "Intermediate Exchange in the IKEv2
Protocol", draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate-10 (work
in progress), March 2022.
[I-D.ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke]
Tjhai, C., Tomlinson, M., Bartlett, G., Fluhrer, S.,
Geest, D. V., Garcia-Morchon, O., and V. Smyslov,
"Multiple Key Exchanges in IKEv2", draft-ietf-ipsecme-
ikev2-multiple-ke-04 (work in progress), September 2021.
[I-D.smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt]
Smyslov, V., "Alternative Approach for Mixing Preshared
Keys in IKEv2 for Post-quantum Security", draft-smyslov-
ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt-04 (work in progress), August 2021.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 60]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
[IKEV2-IANA]
IANA, "Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2)
Parameters", <http://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-
parameters/ikev2-parameters.xhtml#ikev2-parameters-7>.
[NNL] Naor, D., Noal, M., and J. Lotspiech, "Revocation and
Tracing Schemes for Stateless Receivers", Advances in
Cryptology, Crypto '01, Springer-Verlag LNCS 2139, 2001,
pp. 41-62, 2001,
<http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~naor/PAPERS/2nl.pdf>.
[OFT] McGrew, D. and A. Sherman, "Key Establishment in Large
Dynamic Groups Using One-Way Function Trees", Manuscript,
submitted to IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,
1998, <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/
d24c/7b41f7bcc2b6690e1b4d80eaf8c3e1cc5ee5.pdf>.
[RFC2409] Harkins, D. and D. Carrel, "The Internet Key Exchange
(IKE)", RFC 2409, DOI 10.17487/RFC2409, November 1998,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2409>.
[RFC2627] Wallner, D., Harder, E., and R. Agee, "Key Management for
Multicast: Issues and Architectures", RFC 2627,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2627, June 1999,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2627>.
[RFC3279] Bassham, L., Polk, W., and R. Housley, "Algorithms and
Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
(CRL) Profile", RFC 3279, DOI 10.17487/RFC3279, April
2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3279>.
[RFC3686] Housley, R., "Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
Counter Mode With IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload
(ESP)", RFC 3686, DOI 10.17487/RFC3686, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3686>.
[RFC3740] Hardjono, T. and B. Weis, "The Multicast Group Security
Architecture", RFC 3740, DOI 10.17487/RFC3740, March 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3740>.
[RFC4046] Baugher, M., Canetti, R., Dondeti, L., and F. Lindholm,
"Multicast Security (MSEC) Group Key Management
Architecture", RFC 4046, DOI 10.17487/RFC4046, April 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4046>.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 61]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
[RFC4106] Viega, J. and D. McGrew, "The Use of Galois/Counter Mode
(GCM) in IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)",
RFC 4106, DOI 10.17487/RFC4106, June 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4106>.
[RFC4309] Housley, R., "Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) CCM
Mode with IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)",
RFC 4309, DOI 10.17487/RFC4309, December 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4309>.
[RFC4543] McGrew, D. and J. Viega, "The Use of Galois Message
Authentication Code (GMAC) in IPsec ESP and AH", RFC 4543,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4543, May 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4543>.
[RFC5374] Weis, B., Gross, G., and D. Ignjatic, "Multicast
Extensions to the Security Architecture for the Internet
Protocol", RFC 5374, DOI 10.17487/RFC5374, November 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5374>.
[RFC5480] Turner, S., Brown, D., Yiu, K., Housley, R., and T. Polk,
"Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key
Information", RFC 5480, DOI 10.17487/RFC5480, March 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5480>.
[RFC5685] Devarapalli, V. and K. Weniger, "Redirect Mechanism for
the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)",
RFC 5685, DOI 10.17487/RFC5685, November 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5685>.
[RFC5723] Sheffer, Y. and H. Tschofenig, "Internet Key Exchange
Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) Session Resumption", RFC 5723,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5723, January 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5723>.
[RFC5998] Eronen, P., Tschofenig, H., and Y. Sheffer, "An Extension
for EAP-Only Authentication in IKEv2", RFC 5998,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5998, September 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5998>.
[RFC6407] Weis, B., Rowles, S., and T. Hardjono, "The Group Domain
of Interpretation", RFC 6407, DOI 10.17487/RFC6407,
October 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6407>.
[RFC6467] Kivinen, T., "Secure Password Framework for Internet Key
Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2)", RFC 6467,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6467, December 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6467>.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 62]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
[RFC7383] Smyslov, V., "Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2
(IKEv2) Message Fragmentation", RFC 7383,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7383, November 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7383>.
[RFC7634] Nir, Y., "ChaCha20, Poly1305, and Their Use in the
Internet Key Exchange Protocol (IKE) and IPsec", RFC 7634,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7634, August 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7634>.
[RFC8017] Moriarty, K., Ed., Kaliski, B., Jonsson, J., and A. Rusch,
"PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2",
RFC 8017, DOI 10.17487/RFC8017, November 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8017>.
[RFC8229] Pauly, T., Touati, S., and R. Mantha, "TCP Encapsulation
of IKE and IPsec Packets", RFC 8229, DOI 10.17487/RFC8229,
August 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8229>.
[RFC8784] Fluhrer, S., Kampanakis, P., McGrew, D., and V. Smyslov,
"Mixing Preshared Keys in the Internet Key Exchange
Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) for Post-quantum Security",
RFC 8784, DOI 10.17487/RFC8784, June 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8784>.
Appendix A. Use of LKH in G-IKEv2
Section 5.4 of [RFC2627] describes the LKH architecture, and how a
GCKS uses LKH to exclude group members. This section clarifies how
the LKH architecture is used with G-IKEv2.
A.1. Notation
In this section we will use the notation X{Y} where a key with ID Y
is encrypted with the key with ID X. The notation GSK_w{Y} means
that the default wrap key GSK_w (with zero KWK ID)is used to encrypt
key Y, and the notation X{K_sa} means key X is used to encrypt the SA
key K_sa (wich always has zero Key ID). Note, that GSK_w{K_sa} means
that the SA key is encrypted with the default wrap key, in which case
both KWK ID and Key ID are zero. For simplicity we will assume that
The content of the KD payload will be shown as a sequence of Key
Packets. The Group Key Packet substructure will be denoted as
GP(SAn)(), when n is an SPI for the SA, and the Member Key Packet
substructure will be denoted as MP(). The content of the Key Packets
is shown as SA_KEY and WRAP_KEY attributes with the notation
described above. For simplicity the type of the attribute will not
be shown, because it is implicitly defined by the type of Key Packet.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 63]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
Here is the example of KD payload.
KD(GP1(X{K_sa}),MP(Y{X},Z{Y},GSK_w{Z})
For simplicity any other attributes in the KD payload are omitted.
We will also use the notation X->Y->Z to describe the Key Path. In
this case key Y is needed to dectypt key X and key Z is needed to
decrypt key Y. In the example above the keys had the following
relation: K_sa->X->Y->Z->GSK_w.
A.2. Group Creation
When a GCKS forms a group, it creates a key tree as shown in the
figure below. The key tree contains logical keys (which are
represented as the values of their Key IDs in the figure) and a
private key shared with only a single GM (the GMs are represented as
letters followed by the corresponding key ID in parentheses in the
figure). The root of the tree contains the multicast Rekey SA key
(which is represented as SAn(K_san). The figure below assumes that
the Key IDs are assigned sequentially; this is not a requirement and
only used for illustrative purposes. The GCKS may create a complete
tree as shown, or a partial tree which is created on demand as
members join the group.
SA1(K_sa1)
+------------------------------+
1 2
+---------------+ +---------------+
3 4 5 6
+-------+ +-------+ +--------+ +--------+
A(7) B(8) C(9) D(10) E(11) F(12) G(13) H(14)
Figure 28: Initial LKH tree
When GM A joins the group, the GCKS provides it with the keys in the
KD payload of the GSA_AUTH or GSA_REGISTRATION exchange. Given the
tree shown in figure above, the KD payload will be:
KD(GP(SA1)(1{K_sa1}),MP(3{1},7{3},GSK_w{7})
KD Payload for the Group Member A
From these attributes the GM A will construct the Key Path
K_sa1->1->3->7->GSK_w and since it ends up with GSK_w, it will use
all the WRAP_KEY attributes present in the path as its Working Key
Path: 1->3->7.
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 64]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
Similarly, when other GMs will be joining the group they will be
provided with the corresponding keys, so after all the GMs will have
the following Working Key Paths:
A: 1->3->7 B: 1->3->8 C: 1->4->9, D: 1->4->10
E: 2->5->11 F: 2->5->12 G: 2->6->13 H: 2->6->14
A.3. Simple Group SA Rekey
If the GCKS performs a simple SA rekey without changing group
membership, it will only send Group Key Packet in the KD payload with
a new SA key encrypted with the default KWK.
KD(GP(SA2)(GSK_w{K_sa2}))
KD Payload for the Simple Group SA Rekey
All the GMs will be able to decrypt it and no changes in their
Working Key Paths will happen.
A.4. Group Member Exclusion
If the GKCS has reason to believe that a GM should be excluded, then
it can do so by sending a GSA_REKEY message that includes a set of
GM_KEY attributes which would allow all GMs except for the excluded
one to get a new SA key.
In the example below the GCKS excludes GM F. For this purpose it
changes the key tree as follows, replacing the key 2 with the key 15
and the key 5 with the key 16. It also generates a new SA key for a
new SA3.
SA3(K_sa3)
+------------------------------+
1 15
+---------------+ +---------------+
3 4 16 6
+-------+ +-------+ +---- +--------+
A(7) B(8) C(9) D(10) E(11) F(12) G(13) H(14)
Figure 29: LKH tree after F has been excluded
Then it sends the following KD payload for the new Rekey SA3:
KD(GP(SA3)(1{K_sa3},15{K_sa3}),MP(6{15},16{15},11{16})
KD Payload for the Group Member F
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 65]
Internet-Draft G-IKEv2 March 2022
While processing this KD payload:
o GMs A, B, C and D will be able to decrypt the SA_KEY attribute
1{K_sa3} by using the "1" key from their key path. Since no new
GM_KEY attributes are in the new Key Path, they won't update their
Working Key Paths.
o GMs G and H will construct new Key Path 15->6 and will be able to
decrypt the intermediate key 15 using the key 6 from their Working
Key Paths. So, they will update their Working Key Paths replacing
their beginnings up to the key 6 with the new Key Path (thus
replacing the key 2 with the key 15).
o GM E will construct new Key Path 16->15->11 and will be able to
decrypt the intermediate key 16 using the key 11 from its Working
Key Path. So, it will update its Working Key Path replacing its
beginnings up to the key 11 with the new Key Path (thus replacing
the key 2 with the key 15 and the key 5 with the key 16).
o GM F won't be able to construct any Key Path leading to any key he
possesses, so it will be unable to decrypt the new SA key for the
SA3 and thus it will be excluded from the group once the SA3 is
used.
Finally, the GMs will have the following Working Key Paths:
A: 1->3->7 B: 1->3->8 C: 1->4->9, D: 1->4->10
E: 15->16->11 F: excluded G: 15->6->13 H: 15->6->14
Authors' Addresses
Valery Smyslov
ELVIS-PLUS
PO Box 81
Moscow (Zelenograd) 124460
Russian Federation
Phone: +7 495 276 0211
Email: svan@elvis.ru
Brian Weis
Independent
USA
Email: bew.stds@gmail.com
Smyslov & Weis Expires September 19, 2022 [Page 66]