[Search] [pdfized|bibtex] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]
Versions: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 rfc2326             Standards Track
                                                        IPR declarations
Internet Engineering Task Force                                   MMUSIC WG
Internet Draft                          H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier
draft-ietf-mmusic-rtsp-08.txt             Columbia U./Netscape/RealNetworks
January 15, 1998                                     Expires: July 15, 1998

                  Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP)


   This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
   documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
   and its working groups.  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as ``work in progress''.

   To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
   ``1id-abstracts.txt'' listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow
   Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), nic.nordu.net (Europe),
   munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ds.internic.net (US East Coast), or
   ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast).

   Distribution of this document is unlimited.


   The Real Time Streaming Protocol, or RTSP, is an application-level
   protocol for control over the delivery of data with real-time
   properties. RTSP provides an extensible framework to enable
   controlled, on-demand delivery of real-time data, such as audio and
   video. Sources of data can include both live data feeds and stored
   clips. This protocol is intended to control multiple data delivery
   sessions, provide a means for choosing delivery channels such as UDP,
   multicast UDP and TCP, and provide a means for choosing delivery
   mechanisms based upon RTP (RFC 1889).

   This is a snapshot of the current draft which will become the next
   version of the ``official'' Internet Draft.

Copyright Notice:

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1997).  All Rights Reserved.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page  1

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

Table of Contents

     * Contents
     * 1 Introduction
          + 1.1 Purpose
          + 1.2 Requirements
          + 1.3 Terminology
          + 1.4 Protocol Properties
          + 1.5 Extending RTSP
          + 1.6 Overall Operation
          + 1.7 RTSP States
          + 1.8 Relationship with Other Protocols
     * 2 Notational Conventions
     * 3 Protocol Parameters
          + 3.1 RTSP Version
          + 3.2 RTSP URL
          + 3.3 Conference Identifiers
          + 3.4 Session Identifiers
          + 3.5 SMPTE Relative Timestamps
          + 3.6 Normal Play Time
          + 3.7 Absolute Time
          + 3.8 Option Tags
               o 3.8.1 Registering New Option Tags with IANA
     * 4 RTSP Message
          + 4.1 Message Types
          + 4.2 Message Headers
          + 4.3 Message Body
          + 4.4 Message Length
     * 5 General Header Fields
     * 6 Request
          + 6.1 Request Line
          + 6.2 Request Header Fields
     * 7 Response
          + 7.1 Status-Line
               o 7.1.1 Status Code and Reason Phrase
               o 7.1.2 Response Header Fields
     * 8 Entity
          + 8.1 Entity Header Fields
          + 8.2 Entity Body
     * 9 Connections
          + 9.1 Pipelining
          + 9.2 Reliability and Acknowledgements
     * 10 Method Definitions
          + 10.1 OPTIONS
          + 10.2 DESCRIBE
          + 10.3 ANNOUNCE

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page  2

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          + 10.4 SETUP
          + 10.5 PLAY
          + 10.6 PAUSE
          + 10.7 TEARDOWN
          + 10.8 GET_PARAMETER
          + 10.9 SET_PARAMETER
          + 10.10 REDIRECT
          + 10.11 RECORD
          + 10.12 Embedded (Interleaved) Binary Data
     * 11 Status Code Definitions
          + 11.1 Success 2xx
               o 11.1.1 250 Low on Storage Space
          + 11.2 Redirection 3xx
          + 11.3 Client Error 4xx
               o 11.3.1 405 Method Not Allowed
               o 11.3.2 451 Parameter Not Understood
               o 11.3.3 452 Conference Not Found
               o 11.3.4 453 Not Enough Bandwidth
               o 11.3.5 454 Session Not Found
               o 11.3.6 455 Method Not Valid in This State
               o 11.3.7 456 Header Field Not Valid for Resource
               o 11.3.8 457 Invalid Range
               o 11.3.9 458 Parameter Is Read-Only
               o 11.3.10 459 Aggregate Operation Not Allowed
               o 11.3.11 460 Only Aggregate Operation Allowed
               o 11.3.12 461 Unsupported Transport
               o 11.3.13 462 Destination Unreachable
               o 11.3.14 551 Option not supported
     * 12 Header Field Definitions
          + 12.1 Accept
          + 12.2 Accept-Encoding
          + 12.3 Accept-Language
          + 12.4 Allow
          + 12.5 Authorization
          + 12.6 Bandwidth
          + 12.7 Blocksize
          + 12.8 Cache-Control
          + 12.9 Conference
          + 12.10 Connection
          + 12.11 Content-Base
          + 12.12 Content-Encoding
          + 12.13 Content-Language
          + 12.14 Content-Length
          + 12.15 Content-Location
          + 12.16 Content-Type
          + 12.17 CSeq

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page  3

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          + 12.18 Date
          + 12.19 Expires
          + 12.20 From
          + 12.21 Host
          + 12.22 If-Match
          + 12.23 If-Modified-Since
          + 12.24 Last-Modified
          + 12.25 Location
          + 12.26 Proxy-Authenticate
          + 12.27 Proxy-Require
          + 12.28 Public
          + 12.29 Range
          + 12.30 Referer
          + 12.31 Retry-After
          + 12.32 Require
          + 12.33 RTP-Info
          + 12.34 Scale
          + 12.35 Speed
          + 12.36 Server
          + 12.37 Session
          + 12.38 Timestamp
          + 12.39 Transport
          + 12.40 Unsupported
          + 12.41 User-Agent
          + 12.42 Vary
          + 12.43 Via
          + 12.44 WWW-Authenticate
     * 13 Caching
     * 14 Examples
          + 14.1 Media on Demand (Unicast)
          + 14.2 Streaming of a Container file
          + 14.3 Single Stream Container Files
          + 14.4 Live Media Presentation Using Multicast
          + 14.5 Playing media into an existing session
          + 14.6 Recording
     * 15 Syntax
          + 15.1 Base Syntax
     * 16 Security Considerations
     * A RTSP Protocol State Machines
          + A.1 Client State Machine
          + A.2 Server State Machine
     * B Interaction with RTP
     * C Use of SDP for RTSP Session Descriptions
          + C.1 Definitions
               o C.1.1 Control URL
               o C.1.2 Media streams

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page  4

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

               o C.1.3 Payload type(s)
               o C.1.4 Format-specific parameters
               o C.1.5 Range of presentation
               o C.1.6 Time of availability
               o C.1.7 Connection Information
               o C.1.8 Entity Tag
          + C.2 Aggregate Control Not Available
          + C.3 Aggregate Control Available
     * D Minimal RTSP implementation
          + D.1 Client
               o D.1.1 Basic Playback
               o D.1.2 Authentication-enabled
          + D.2 Server
               o D.2.1 Basic Playback
               o D.2.2 Authentication-enabled
     * E Author Addresses
     * F Acknowledgements
     * References

1 Introduction

1.1 Purpose

   The Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) establishes and controls
   either a single or several time-synchronized streams of continuous
   media such as audio and video. It does not typically deliver the
   continuous streams itself, although interleaving of the continuous
   media stream with the control stream is possible (see Section 10.12).
   In other words, RTSP acts as a ``network remote control'' for
   multimedia servers.

   The set of streams to be controlled is defined by a presentation
   description. This memorandum does not define a format for a
   presentation description.

   There is no notion of an RTSP connection; instead, a server maintains
   a session labeled by an identifier. An RTSP session is in no way tied
   to a transport-level connection such as a TCP connection. During an
   RTSP session, an RTSP client may open and close many reliable
   transport connections to the server to issue RTSP requests.
   Alternatively, it may use a connectionless transport protocol such as

   The streams controlled by RTSP may use RTP [1], but the operation of
   RTSP does not depend on the transport mechanism used to carry
   continuous media.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page  5

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   The protocol is intentionally similar in syntax and operation to
   HTTP/1.1 [2] so that extension mechanisms to HTTP can in most cases
   also be added to RTSP. However, RTSP differs in a number of important
   aspects from HTTP:

     * RTSP introduces a number of new methods and has a different
       protocol identifier.
     * An RTSP server needs to maintain state by default in almost all
       cases, as opposed to the stateless nature of HTTP.
     * Both an RTSP server and client can issue requests.
     * Data is carried out-of-band by a different protocol. (There is an
       exception to this.)
     * RTSP is defined to use ISO 10646 (UTF-8) rather than ISO 8859-1,
       consistent with current HTML internationalization efforts [3].
     * The Request-URI always contains the absolute URI. Because of
       backward compatibility with a historical blunder, HTTP/1.1 [2]
       carries only the absolute path in the request and puts the host
       name in a separate header field.

     This makes ``virtual hosting'' easier, where a single host with one
     IP address hosts several document trees.

   The protocol supports the following operations:

   Retrieval of media from media server:
          The client can request a presentation description via HTTP or
          some other method. If the presentation is being multicast, the
          presentation description contains the multicast addresses and
          ports to be used for the continuous media. If the presentation
          is to be sent only to the client via unicast, the client
          provides the destination for security reasons.

   Invitation of a media server to a conference:
          A media server can be ``invited'' to join an existing
          conference, either to play back media into the presentation or
          to record all or a subset of the media in a presentation. This
          mode is useful for distributed teaching applications. Several
          parties in the conference may take turns ``pushing the remote
          control buttons''.

   Addition of media to an existing presentation:
          Particularly for live presentations, it is useful if the server
          can tell the client about additional media becoming available.

   RTSP requests may be handled by proxies, tunnels and caches as in
   HTTP/1.1 [2].

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page  6

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

1.2 Requirements

   The key words ``MUST'', ``MUST NOT'', ``REQUIRED'', ``SHALL'', ``SHALL
   NOT'', ``SHOULD'', ``SHOULD NOT'', ``RECOMMENDED'', ``MAY'', and
   ``OPTIONAL'' in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   RFC 2119 [4].

1.3 Terminology

   Some of the terminology has been adopted from HTTP/1.1 [2]. Terms not
   listed here are defined as in HTTP/1.1.

   Aggregate control:
          The control of the multiple streams using a single timeline by
          the server. For audio/video feeds, this means that the client
          may issue a single play or pause message to control both the
          audio and video feeds.

          a multiparty, multimedia presentation, where ``multi'' implies
          greater than or equal to one.

          The client requests continuous media data from the media

          A transport layer virtual circuit established between two
          programs for the purpose of communication.

   Container file:
          A file which may contain multiple media streams which often
          comprise a presentation when played together. RTSP servers may
          offer aggregate control on these files, though the concept of a
          container file is not embedded in the protocol.

   Continuous media:
          Data where there is a timing relationship between source and
          sink; that is, the sink must reproduce the timing relationship
          that existed at the source. The most common examples of
          continuous media are audio and motion video. Continuous media
          can be real-time (interactive), where there is a ``tight''
          timing relationship between source and sink, or streaming
          (playback), where the relationship is less strict.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page  7

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          The information transferred as the payload of a request or
          response. An entity consists of metainformation in the form of
          entity-header fields and content in the form of an entity-body,
          as described in Section 8.

   Media initialization:
          Datatype/codec specific initialization. This includes such
          things as clockrates, color tables, etc. Any
          transport-independent information which is required by a client
          for playback of a media stream occurs in the media
          initialization phase of stream setup.

   Media parameter:
          Parameter specific to a media type that may be changed before
          or during stream playback.

   Media server:
          The server providing playback or recording services for one or
          more media streams. Different media streams within a
          presentation may originate from different media servers. A
          media server may reside on the same or a different host as the
          web server the presentation is invoked from.

   Media server indirection:
          Redirection of a media client to a different media server.

   (Media) stream:
          A single media instance, e.g., an audio stream or a video
          stream as well as a single whiteboard or shared application
          group. When using RTP, a stream consists of all RTP and RTCP
          packets created by a source within an RTP session. This is
          equivalent to the definition of a DSM-CC stream([5]).

          The basic unit of RTSP communication, consisting of a
          structured sequence of octets matching the syntax defined in
          Section 15 and transmitted via a connection or a connectionless

          Member of a conference. A participant may be a machine, e.g., a
          media record or playback server.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page  8

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          A set of one or more streams presented to the client as a
          complete media feed, using a presentation description as
          defined below. In most cases in the RTSP context, this implies
          aggregate control of those streams, but does not have to.

   Presentation description:
          A presentation description contains information about one or
          more media streams within a presentation, such as the set of
          encodings, network addresses and information about the content.
          Other IETF protocols such as SDP (RFC XXXX [6]) use the term
          ``session'' for a live presentation. The presentation
          description may take several different formats, including but
          not limited to the session description format SDP.

          An RTSP response. If an HTTP response is meant, that is
          indicated explicitly.

          An RTSP request. If an HTTP request is meant, that is indicated

   RTSP session:
          A complete RTSP ``transaction'', e.g., the viewing of a movie.
          A session typically consists of a client setting up a transport
          mechanism for the continuous media stream (SETUP), starting the
          stream with PLAY or RECORD, and closing the stream with

   Transport initialization:
          The negotiation of transport information (e.g., port numbers,
          transport protocols) between the client and the server.

1.4 Protocol Properties

   RTSP has the following properties:

          New methods and parameters can be easily added to RTSP.

   Easy to parse:
          RTSP can be parsed by standard HTTP or MIME parsers.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page  9

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          RTSP re-uses web security mechanisms, either at the transport
          level (TLS, RFC XXXX [7]) or within the protocol itself. All
          HTTP authentication mechanisms such as basic (RFC 2068 [2,
          Section 11.1]) and digest authentication (RFC 2069 [8]) are
          directly applicable.

          RTSP may use either an unreliable datagram protocol (UDP) (RFC
          768 [9]), a reliable datagram protocol (RDP, RFC 1151, not
          widely used [10]) or a reliable stream protocol such as TCP
          (RFC 793 [11]) as it implements application-level reliability.

   Multi-server capable:
          Each media stream within a presentation can reside on a
          different server. The client automatically establishes several
          concurrent control sessions with the different media servers.
          Media synchronization is performed at the transport level.

   Control of recording devices:
          The protocol can control both recording and playback devices,
          as well as devices that can alternate between the two modes

   Separation of stream control and conference initiation:
          Stream control is divorced from inviting a media server to a
          conference. The only requirement is that the conference
          initiation protocol either provides or can be used to create a
          unique conference identifier. In particular, SIP [12] or H.323
          [13] may be used to invite a server to a conference.

   Suitable for professional applications:
          RTSP supports frame-level accuracy through SMPTE time stamps to
          allow remote digital editing.

   Presentation description neutral:
          The protocol does not impose a particular presentation
          description or metafile format and can convey the type of
          format to be used. However, the presentation description must
          contain at least one RTSP URI.

   Proxy and firewall friendly:
          The protocol should be readily handled by both application and
          transport-layer (SOCKS [14]) firewalls. A firewall may need to
          understand the SETUP method to open a ``hole'' for the UDP
          media stream.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 10

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          Where sensible, RTSP reuses HTTP concepts, so that the existing
          infrastructure can be reused. This infrastructure includes PICS
          (Platform for Internet Content Selection [15,16]) for
          associating labels with content. However, RTSP does not just
          add methods to HTTP since the controlling continuous media
          requires server state in most cases.

   Appropriate server control:
          If a client can start a stream, it must be able to stop a
          stream. Servers should not start streaming to clients in such a
          way that clients cannot stop the stream.

   Transport negotiation:
          The client can negotiate the transport method prior to actually
          needing to process a continuous media stream.

   Capability negotiation:
          If basic features are disabled, there must be some clean
          mechanism for the client to determine which methods are not
          going to be implemented. This allows clients to present the
          appropriate user interface. For example, if seeking is not
          allowed, the user interface must be able to disallow moving a
          sliding position indicator.

     An earlier requirement in RTSP was multi-client capability.
     However, it was determined that a better approach was to make sure
     that the protocol is easily extensible to the multi-client
     scenario. Stream identifiers can be used by several control
     streams, so that ``passing the remote'' would be possible. The
     protocol would not address how several clients negotiate access;
     this is left to either a ``social protocol'' or some other floor
     control mechanism.

1.5 Extending RTSP

   Since not all media servers have the same functionality, media servers
   by necessity will support different sets of requests. For example:
     * A server may only be capable of playback thus has no need to
       support the RECORD request.
     * A server may not be capable of seeking (absolute positioning) if
       it is to support live events only.
     * Some servers may not support setting stream parameters and thus
       not support GET_PARAMETER and SET_PARAMETER.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 11

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   A server SHOULD implement all header fields described in Section 12.

   It is up to the creators of presentation descriptions not to ask the
   impossible of a server. This situation is similar in HTTP/1.1 [2],
   where the methods described in [H19.6] are not likely to be supported
   across all servers.

   RTSP can be extended in three ways, listed here in order of the
   magnitude of changes supported:

     * Existing methods can be extended with new parameters, as long as
       these parameters can be safely ignored by the recipient. (This is
       equivalent to adding new parameters to an HTML tag.) If the client
       needs negative acknowledgement when a method extension is not
       supported, a tag corresponding to the extension may be added in
       the Require: field (see Section 12.32).
     * New methods can be added. If the recipient of the message does not
       understand the request, it responds with error code 501 (Not
       implemented) and the sender should not attempt to use this method
       again. A client may also use the OPTIONS method to inquire about
       methods supported by the server. The server SHOULD list the
       methods it supports using the Public response header.
     * A new version of the protocol can be defined, allowing almost all
       aspects (except the position of the protocol version number) to

1.6 Overall Operation

   Each presentation and media stream may be identified by an RTSP URL.
   The overall presentation and the properties of the media the
   presentation is made up of are defined by a presentation description
   file, the format of which is outside the scope of this specification.
   The presentation description file may be obtained by the client using
   HTTP or other means such as email and may not necessarily be stored on
   the media server.

   For the purposes of this specification, a presentation description is
   assumed to describe one or more presentations, each of which maintains
   a common time axis. For simplicity of exposition and without loss of
   generality, it is assumed that the presentation description contains
   exactly one such presentation. A presentation may contain several
   media streams.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 12

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   The presentation description file contains a description of the media
   streams making up the presentation, including their encodings,
   language, and other parameters that enable the client to choose the
   most appropriate combination of media. In this presentation
   description, each media stream that is individually controllable by
   RTSP is identified by an RTSP URL, which points to the media server
   handling that particular media stream and names the stream stored on
   that server. Several media streams can be located on different
   servers; for example, audio and video streams can be split across
   servers for load sharing. The description also enumerates which
   transport methods the server is capable of.

   Besides the media parameters, the network destination address and port
   need to be determined. Several modes of operation can be

          The media is transmitted to the source of the RTSP request,
          with the port number chosen by the client. Alternatively, the
          media is transmitted on the same reliable stream as RTSP.

   Multicast, server chooses address:
          The media server picks the multicast address and port. This is
          the typical case for a live or near-media-on-demand

   Multicast, client chooses address:
          If the server is to participate in an existing multicast
          conference, the multicast address, port and encryption key are
          given by the conference description, established by means
          outside the scope of this specification.

1.7 RTSP States

     RTSP controls a stream which may be sent via a separate protocol,
   independent of the control channel. For example, RTSP control may
   occur on a TCP connection while the data flows via UDP. Thus, data
   delivery continues even if no RTSP requests are received by the media
   server. Also, during its lifetime, a single media stream may be
   controlled by RTSP requests issued sequentially on different TCP
   connections. Therefore, the server needs to maintain ``session state''
   to be able to correlate RTSP requests with a stream. The state
   transitions are described in Section A.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 13

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   Many methods in RTSP do not contribute to state. However, the
   following play a central role in defining the allocation and usage of
   stream resources on the server: SETUP, PLAY, RECORD, PAUSE, and

          Causes the server to allocate resources for a stream and start
          an RTSP session.

          Starts data transmission on a stream allocated via SETUP.

          Temporarily halts a stream without freeing server resources.

          Frees resources associated with the stream. The RTSP session
          ceases to exist on the server.

1.8 Relationship with Other Protocols

   RTSP has some overlap in functionality with HTTP. It also may interact
   with HTTP in that the initial contact with streaming content is often
   to be made through a web page. The current protocol specification aims
   to allow different hand-off points between a web server and the media
   server implementing RTSP. For example, the presentation description
   can be retrieved using HTTP or RTSP, which reduces roundtrips in
   web-browser-based scenarios, yet also allows for standalone RTSP
   servers and clients which do not rely on HTTP at all.

   However, RTSP differs fundamentally from HTTP in that data delivery
   takes place out-of-band in a different protocol. HTTP is an asymmetric
   protocol where the client issues requests and the server responds. In
   RTSP, both the media client and media server can issue requests. RTSP
   requests are also not stateless; they may set parameters and continue
   to control a media stream long after the request has been

     Re-using HTTP functionality has advantages in at least two areas,
     namely security and proxies. The requirements are very similar, so
     having the ability to adopt HTTP work on caches, proxies and
     authentication is valuable.

   While most real-time media will use RTP as a transport protocol, RTSP
   is not tied to RTP.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 14

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   RTSP assumes the existence of a presentation description format that
   can express both static and temporal properties of a presentation
   containing several media streams.

2 Notational Conventions

   Since many of the definitions and syntax are identical to HTTP/1.1,
   this specification only points to the section where they are defined
   rather than copying it. For brevity, [HX.Y] is to be taken to refer to
   Section X.Y of the current HTTP/1.1 specification (RFC 2068 [2]).

   All the mechanisms specified in this document are described in both
   prose and an augmented Backus-Naur form (BNF) similar to that used in
   [H2.1]. It is described in detail in RFC 2234 [17], with the
   difference that this RTSP specification maintains the ``1#'' notation
   for comma-separated lists.

   In this draft, we use indented and smaller-type paragraphs to provide
   background and motivation. This is intended to give readers who were
   not involved with the formulation of the specification an
   understanding of why things are the way that they are in RTSP.

3 Protocol Parameters

3.1 RTSP Version

   [H3.1] applies, with HTTP replaced by RTSP.


     The ``rtsp'', ``rtspu'' and ``rtsps'' schemes are used to refer to
   network resources via the RTSP protocol. This section defines the
   scheme-specific syntax and semantics for RTSP URLs.

   rtsp_URL  =   ( "rtsp:" | "rtspu:" | "rtsps:" )
                 "//" host [ ":" port ] [ abs_path ]
   host      =   <A legal Internet host domain name of IP address
                 (in dotted decimal form), as defined by Section 2.1
                 of RFC 1123 \cite{rfc1123}>
   port      =   *DIGIT

   abs_path is defined in [H3.2.1].

     Note that fragment and query identifiers do not have a well-defined
     meaning at this time, with the interpretation left to the RTSP

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 15

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   The scheme rtsp requires that commands are issued via a reliable
   protocol (within the Internet, TCP), while the scheme rtspu identifies
   an unreliable protocol (within the Internet, UDP). The scheme rtsps
   indicates that a TCP connection secured by TLS (RFC XXXX) [7] must be

   If the port is empty or not given, port 554 is assumed. The semantics
   are that the identified resource can be controlled by RTSP at the
   server listening for TCP (scheme ``rtsp'') connections or UDP (scheme
   ``rtspu'') packets on that port of host, and the Request-URI for the
   resource is rtsp_URL.

   The use of IP addresses in URLs SHOULD be avoided whenever possible
   (see RFC 1924 [19]).

   A presentation or a stream is identified by a textual media
   identifier, using the character set and escape conventions [H3.2] of
   URLs (RFC 1738 [20]). URLs may refer to a stream or an aggregate of
   streams, i.e., a presentation. Accordingly, requests described in
   Section 10 can apply to either the whole presentation or an individual
   stream within the presentation. Note that some request methods can
   only be applied to streams, not presentations and vice versa.

   For example, the RTSP URL:

   identifies the audio stream within the presentation ``twister'', which
   can be controlled via RTSP requests issued over a TCP connection to
   port 554 of host media.example.com.

   Also, the RTSP URL:

   identifies the presentation ``twister'', which may be composed of
   audio and video streams.

     This does not imply a standard way to reference streams in URLs.
     The presentation description defines the hierarchical relationships
     in the presentation and the URLs for the individual streams. A
     presentation description may name a stream ``a.mov'' and the whole
     presentation ``b.mov''.

   The path components of the RTSP URL are opaque to the client and do
   not imply any particular file system structure for the server.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 16

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     This decoupling also allows presentation descriptions to be used
     with non-RTSP media control protocols simply by replacing the
     scheme in the URL.

3.3 Conference Identifiers

     Conference identifiers are opaque to RTSP and are encoded using
   standard URI encoding methods (i.e., LWS is escaped with %). They can
   contain any octet value. The conference identifier MUST be globally
   unique. For H.323, the conferenceID value is to be used.

 conference-id =   1*xchar

     Conference identifiers are used to allow RTSP sessions to obtain
     parameters from multimedia conferences the media server is
     participating in. These conferences are created by protocols
     outside the scope of this specification, e.g., H.323 [13] or SIP
     [12]. Instead of the RTSP client explicitly providing transport
     information, for example, it asks the media server to use the
     values in the conference description instead.

3.4 Session Identifiers

     Session identifiers are opaque strings of arbitrary length. Linear
   white space must be URL-escaped. A session identifier MUST be chosen
   randomly and MUST be at least eight octets long to make guessing it
   more difficult. (See Section 16.)

     session-id   =   1*( ALPHA | DIGIT | safe )

3.5 SMPTE Relative Timestamps

     A SMPTE relative timestamp expresses time relative to the start of
   the clip. Relative timestamps are expressed as SMPTE time codes for
   frame-level access accuracy. The time code has the format
   hours:minutes:seconds:frames.subframes, with the origin at the start
   of the clip. The default smpte format is``SMPTE 30 drop'' format, with
   frame rate is 29.97 frames per second. Other SMPTE codes MAY be
   supported (such as "SMPTE 25") through the use of alternative use of
   "smpte time". For the ``frames'' field in the time value can assume
   the values 0 through 29. The difference between 30 and 29.97 frames
   per second is handled by dropping the first two frame indices (values
   00 and 01) of every minute, except every tenth minute. If the frame
   value is zero, it may be omitted. Subframes are measured in
   one-hundredth of a frame.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 17

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   smpte-range  =   smpte-type "=" smpte-time "-" [ smpte-time ]
   smpte-type   =   "smpte" | "smpte-30-drop" | "smpte-25"
                                   ; other timecodes may be added
   smpte-time   =   1*2DIGIT ":" 1*2DIGIT ":" 1*2DIGIT [ ":" 1*2DIGIT ]
                    [ "." 1*2DIGIT ]


3.6 Normal Play Time

     Normal play time (NPT) indicates the stream absolute position
   relative to the beginning of the presentation. The timestamp consists
   of a decimal fraction. The part left of the decimal may be expressed
   in either seconds or hours, minutes, and seconds. The part right of
   the decimal point measures fractions of a second.

   The beginning of a presentation corresponds to 0.0 seconds. Negative
   values are not defined. The special constant now is defined as the
   current instant of a live event. It may be used only for live events.

   NPT is defined as in DSM-CC: ``Intuitively, NPT is the clock the
   viewer associates with a program. It is often digitally displayed on a
   VCR. NPT advances normally when in normal play mode (scale = 1),
   advances at a faster rate when in fast scan forward (high positive
   scale ratio), decrements when in scan reverse (high negative scale
   ratio) and is fixed in pause mode. NPT is (logically) equivalent to
   SMPTE time codes.'' [5]

   npt-range    =   ( npt-time "-" [ npt-time ] ) | ( "-" npt-time )
   npt-time     =   "now" | npt-sec | npt-hhmmss
   npt-sec      =   1*DIGIT [ "." *DIGIT ]
   npt-hhmmss   =   npt-hh ":" npt-mm ":" npt-ss [ "." *DIGIT ]
   npt-hh       =   1*DIGIT     ; any positive number
   npt-mm       =   1*2DIGIT    ; 0-59
   npt-ss       =   1*2DIGIT    ; 0-59


H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 18

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     The syntax conforms to ISO 8601. The npt-sec notation is optimized
     for automatic generation, the ntp-hhmmss notation for consumption
     by human readers. The ``now'' constant allows clients to request to
     receive the live feed rather than the stored or time-delayed
     version. This is needed since neither absolute time nor zero time
     are appropriate for this case.

3.7 Absolute Time

     Absolute time is expressed as ISO 8601 timestamps, using UTC (GMT).
   Fractions of a second may be indicated.

   utc-range    =   "clock" "=" utc-time "-" [ utc-time ]
   utc-time     =   utc-date "T" utc-time "Z"
   utc-date     =   8DIGIT                    ; < YYYYMMDD >
   utc-time     =   6DIGIT [ "." fraction ]   ; < HHMMSS.fraction >

   Example for November 8, 1996 at 14h37 and 20 and a quarter seconds


3.8 Option Tags

     Option tags are unique identifiers used to designate new options in
   RTSP. These tags are used in in Require (Section 12.32) and
   Proxy-Require (Section 12.27) header fields.


     option-tag   =   1*xchar

   The creator of a new RTSP option should either prefix the option with
   a reverse domain name (e.g., ``com.foo.mynewfeature'' is an apt name
   for a feature whose inventor can be reached at ``foo.com''), or
   register the new option with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority

  3.8.1 Registering New Option Tags with IANA

   When registering a new RTSP option, the following information should
   be provided:

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 19

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     * Name and description of option. The name may be of any length, but
       SHOULD be no more than twenty characters long. The name MUST not
       contain any spaces, control characters or periods.
     * Indication of who has change control over the option (for example,
       IETF, ISO, ITU-T, other international standardization bodies, a
       consortium or a particular company or group of companies);
     * A reference to a further description, if available, for example
       (in order of preference) an RFC, a published paper, a patent
       filing, a technical report, documented source code or a computer
     * For proprietary options, contact information (postal and email

4 RTSP Message

     RTSP is a text-based protocol and uses the ISO 10646 character set
   in UTF-8 encoding (RFC XXXX [21]). Lines are terminated by CRLF, but
   receivers should be prepared to also interpret CR and LF by themselves
   as line terminators.

     Text-based protocols make it easier to add optional parameters in a
     self-describing manner. Since the number of parameters and the
     frequency of commands is low, processing efficiency is not a
     concern. Text-based protocols, if done carefully, also allow easy
     implementation of research prototypes in scripting languages such
     as Tcl, Visual Basic and Perl.

     The 10646 character set avoids tricky character set switching, but
     is invisible to the application as long as US-ASCII is being used.
     This is also the encoding used for RTCP. ISO 8859-1 translates
     directly into Unicode with a high-order octet of zero. ISO 8859-1
     characters with the most-significant bit set are represented as
     1100001x 10xxxxxx. (See RFC XXXX [21])

   RTSP messages can be carried over any lower-layer transport protocol
   that is 8-bit clean.

   Requests contain methods, the object the method is operating upon and
   parameters to further describe the method. Methods are idempotent,
   unless otherwise noted. Methods are also designed to require little or
   no state maintenance at the media server.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 20

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

4.1 Message Types

   See [H4.1]

4.2 Message Headers

   See [H4.2]

4.3 Message Body

   See [H4.3]

4.4 Message Length

   When a message body is included with a message, the length of that
   body is determined by one of the following (in order of precedence):

   1.     Any response message which MUST NOT include a message body
          (such as the 1xx, 204, and 304 responses) is always terminated
          by the first empty line after the header fields, regardless of
          the entity-header fields present in the message. (Note: An
          empty line consists of only CRLF.)

   2.     If a Content-Length header field (section 12.14) is present,
          its value in bytes represents the length of the message-body.
          If this header field is not present, a value of zero is

   3.     By the server closing the connection. (Closing the connection
          cannot be used to indicate the end of a request body, since
          that would leave no possibility for the server to send back a

   Note that RTSP does not (at present) support the HTTP/1.1 ``chunked''
   transfer coding(see [H3.6]) and requires the presence of the
   Content-Length header field.

     Given the moderate length of presentation descriptions returned,
     the server should always be able to determine its length, even if
     it is generated dynamically, making the chunked transfer encoding
     unnecessary. Even though Content-Length must be present if there is
     any entity body, the rules ensure reasonable behavior even if the
     length is not given explicitly.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 21

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

5 General Header Fields

     See [H4.5], except that Pragma, Transfer-Encoding and Upgrade
   headers are not defined:

      general-header     =     Cache-Control     ; Section 12.8
                         |     Connection        ; Section 12.10
                         |     Date              ; Section 12.18
                         |     Via               ; Section 12.43

6 Request

     A request message from a client to a server or vice versa includes,
   within the first line of that message, the method to be applied to the
   resource, the identifier of the resource, and the protocol version in

       Request      =       Request-Line          ; Section 6.1
                    *(      general-header        ; Section 5
                    |       request-header        ; Section 6.2
                    |       entity-header )       ; Section 8.1
                            [ message-body ]      ; Section 4.3

6.1 Request Line

  Request-Line = Method SP Request-URI SP RTSP-Version CRLF

   Method         =         "DESCRIBE"              ; Section 10.2
                  |         "ANNOUNCE"              ; Section 10.3
                  |         "GET_PARAMETER"         ; Section 10.8
                  |         "OPTIONS"               ; Section 10.1
                  |         "PAUSE"                 ; Section 10.6
                  |         "PLAY"                  ; Section 10.5
                  |         "RECORD"                ; Section 10.11
                  |         "REDIRECT"              ; Section 10.10
                  |         "SETUP"                 ; Section 10.4
                  |         "SET_PARAMETER"         ; Section 10.9
                  |         "TEARDOWN"              ; Section 10.7
                  |         extension-method

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 22

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

  extension-method = token

  Request-URI = "*" | absolute_URI

  RTSP-Version = "RTSP" "/" 1*DIGIT "." 1*DIGIT

6.2 Request Header Fields

  request-header  =          Accept                   ; Section 12.1
                  |          Accept-Encoding          ; Section 12.2
                  |          Accept-Language          ; Section 12.3
                  |          Authorization            ; Section 12.5
                  |          From                     ; Section 12.20
                  |          If-Modified-Since        ; Section 12.23
                  |          Range                    ; Section 12.29
                  |          Referer                  ; Section 12.30
                  |          User-Agent               ; Section 12.41

   Note that in contrast to HTTP/1.1 [2], RTSP requests always contain
   the absolute URL (that is, including the scheme, host and port) rather
   than just the absolute path.

     HTTP/1.1 requires servers to understand the absolute URL, but
     clients are supposed to use the Host request header. This is purely
     needed for backward-compatibility with HTTP/1.0 servers, a
     consideration that does not apply to RTSP.

   The asterisk "*" in the Request-URI means that the request does not
   apply to a particular resource, but to the server itself, and is only
   allowed when the method used does not necessarily apply to a resource.
   One example would be:

     OPTIONS * RTSP/1.0

7 Response

     [H6] applies except that HTTP-Version is replaced by RTSP-Version.
   Also, RTSP defines additional status codes and does not define some
   HTTP codes. The valid response codes and the methods they can be used
   with are defined in Table 1.

   After receiving and interpreting a request message, the recipient
   responds with an RTSP response message.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 23

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     Response    =     Status-Line         ; Section 7.1
                 *(    general-header      ; Section 5
                 |     response-header     ; Section 7.1.2
                 |     entity-header )     ; Section 8.1
                       [ message-body ]    ; Section 4.3

7.1 Status-Line

     The first line of a Response message is the Status-Line, consisting
   of the protocol version followed by a numeric status code, and the
   textual phrase associated with the status code, with each element
   separated by SP characters. No CR or LF is allowed except in the final
   CRLF sequence.

   Status-Line  =        RTSP-Version SP Status-Code SP Reason-Phrase CRLF

  7.1.1 Status Code and Reason Phrase

   The Status-Code element is a 3-digit integer result code of the
   attempt to understand and satisfy the request. These codes are fully
   defined in Section 11. The Reason-Phrase is intended to give a short
   textual description of the Status-Code. The Status-Code is intended
   for use by automata and the Reason-Phrase is intended for the human
   user. The client is not required to examine or display the

   The first digit of the Status-Code defines the class of response. The
   last two digits do not have any categorization role. There are 5
   values for the first digit:

     * 1xx: Informational - Request received, continuing process
     * 2xx: Success - The action was successfully received, understood,
       and accepted
     * 3xx: Redirection - Further action must be taken in order to
       complete the request
     * 4xx: Client Error - The request contains bad syntax or cannot be
     * 5xx: Server Error - The server failed to fulfill an apparently
       valid request

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 24

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   The individual values of the numeric status codes defined for
   RTSP/1.0, and an example set of corresponding Reason-Phrase's, are
   presented below. The reason phrases listed here are only recommended -
   they may be replaced by local equivalents without affecting the
   protocol. Note that RTSP adopts most HTTP/1.1 [2] status codes and
   adds RTSP-specific status codes starting at x50 to avoid conflicts
   with newly defined HTTP status codes.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 25

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   Status-Code  =     "100"      ; Continue
                |     "200"      ; OK
                |     "201"      ; Created
                |     "250"      ; Low on Storage Space
                |     "300"      ; Multiple Choices
                |     "301"      ; Moved Permanently
                |     "302"      ; Moved Temporarily
                |     "303"      ; See Other
                |     "304"      ; Not Modified
                |     "305"      ; Use Proxy
                |     "400"      ; Bad Request
                |     "401"      ; Unauthorized
                |     "402"      ; Payment Required
                |     "403"      ; Forbidden
                |     "404"      ; Not Found
                |     "405"      ; Method Not Allowed
                |     "406"      ; Not Acceptable
                |     "407"      ; Proxy Authentication Required
                |     "408"      ; Request Time-out
                |     "410"      ; Gone
                |     "411"      ; Length Required
                |     "412"      ; Precondition Failed
                |     "413"      ; Request Entity Too Large
                |     "414"      ; Request-URI Too Large
                |     "415"      ; Unsupported Media Type
                |     "451"      ; Parameter Not Understood
                |     "452"      ; Conference Not Found
                |     "453"      ; Not Enough Bandwidth
                |     "454"      ; Session Not Found
                |     "455"      ; Method Not Valid in This State
                |     "456"      ; Header Field Not Valid for Resource
                |     "457"      ; Invalid Range
                |     "458"      ; Parameter Is Read-Only
                |     "459"      ; Aggregate operation not allowed
                |     "460"      ; Only aggregate operation allowed
                |     "461"      ; Unsupported transport
                |     "462"      ; Destination unreachable
                |     "500"      ; Internal Server Error
                |     "501"      ; Not Implemented
                |     "502"      ; Bad Gateway
                |     "503"      ; Service Unavailable
                |     "504"      ; Gateway Time-out
                |     "505"      ; RTSP Version not supported
                |     "551"      ; Option not supported
                |     extension-code

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 26

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   extension-code  =     3DIGIT

   Reason-Phrase  =     *<TEXT, excluding CR, LF>

   RTSP status codes are extensible. RTSP applications are not required
   to understand the meaning of all registered status codes, though such
   understanding is obviously desirable. However, applications MUST
   understand the class of any status code, as indicated by the first
   digit, and treat any unrecognized response as being equivalent to the
   x00 status code of that class, with the exception that an unrecognized
   response MUST NOT be cached. For example, if an unrecognized status
   code of 431 is received by the client, it can safely assume that there
   was something wrong with its request and treat the response as if it
   had received a 400 status code. In such cases, user agents SHOULD
   present to the user the entity returned with the response, since that
   entity is likely to include human-readable information which will
   explain the unusual status.

   Code           reason

   100            Continue                         all

   200            OK                               all
   201            Created                          RECORD
   250            Low on Storage Space             RECORD

   300            Multiple Choices                 all
   301            Moved Permanently                all
   302            Moved Temporarily                all
   303            See Other                        all
   305            Use Proxy                        all

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 27

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   400            Bad Request                      all
   401            Unauthorized                     all
   402            Payment Required                 all
   403            Forbidden                        all
   404            Not Found                        all
   405            Method Not Allowed               all
   406            Not Acceptable                   all
   407            Proxy Authentication Required    all
   408            Request Timeout                  all
   410            Gone                             all
   411            Length Required                  all
   412            Precondition Failed              DESCRIBE, SETUP
   413            Request Entity Too Large         all
   414            Request-URI Too Long             all
   415            Unsupported Media Type           all
   451            Invalid parameter                SETUP
   452            Illegal Conference Identifier    SETUP
   453            Not Enough Bandwidth             SETUP
   454            Session Not Found                all
   455            Method Not Valid In This State   all
   456            Header Field Not Valid           all
   457            Invalid Range                    PLAY
   458            Parameter Is Read-Only           SET_PARAMETER
   459            Aggregate Operation Not Allowed  all
   460            Only Aggregate Operation Allowed all
   461            Unsupported Transport            all
   462            Destination Unreachable          all

   500            Internal Server Error            all
   501            Not Implemented                  all
   502            Bad Gateway                      all
   503            Service Unavailable              all
   504            Gateway Timeout                  all
   505            RTSP Version Not Supported       all
   551            Option not support               all

      Table 1: Status codes and their usage with RTSP methods

  7.1.2 Response Header Fields

     The response-header fields allow the request recipient to pass
   additional information about the response which cannot be placed in
   the Status-Line. These header fields give information about the server
   and about further access to the resource identified by the

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 28

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   response-header  =     Location             ; Section 12.25
                    |     Proxy-Authenticate   ; Section 12.26
                    |     Public               ; Section 12.28
                    |     Retry-After          ; Section 12.31
                    |     Server               ; Section 12.36
                    |     Vary                 ; Section 12.42
                    |     WWW-Authenticate     ; Section 12.44

   Response-header field names can be extended reliably only in
   combination with a change in the protocol version. However, new or
   experimental header fields MAY be given the semantics of
   response-header fields if all parties in the communication recognize
   them to be response-header fields. Unrecognized header fields are
   treated as entity-header fields.

8 Entity

     Request and Response messages MAY transfer an entity if not
   otherwise restricted by the request method or response status code. An
   entity consists of entity-header fields and an entity-body, although
   some responses will only include the entity-headers.

   In this section, both sender and recipient refer to either the client
   or the server, depending on who sends and who receives the entity.

8.1 Entity Header Fields

     Entity-header fields define optional metainformation about the
   entity-body or, if no body is present, about the resource identified
   by the request.

     entity-header       =    Allow               ; Section 12.4
                         |    Content-Base        ; Section 12.11
                         |    Content-Encoding    ; Section 12.12
                         |    Content-Language    ; Section 12.13
                         |    Content-Length      ; Section 12.14
                         |    Content-Location    ; Section 12.15
                         |    Content-Type        ; Section 12.16
                         |    Expires             ; Section 12.19
                         |    Last-Modified       ; Section 12.24
                         |    extension-header
     extension-header    =    message-header

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 29

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   The extension-header mechanism allows additional entity-header fields
   to be defined without changing the protocol, but these fields cannot
   be assumed to be recognizable by the recipient. Unrecognized header
   fields SHOULD be ignored by the recipient and forwarded by proxies.

8.2 Entity Body

   See [H7.2]

9 Connections

     RTSP requests can be transmitted in several different ways:

     * persistent transport connections used for several request-response
     * one connection per request/response transaction;
     * connectionless mode.

   The type of transport connection is defined by the RTSP URI
   (Section 3.2). For the scheme ``rtsp'', a persistent connection is
   assumed, while the scheme ``rtspu'' calls for RTSP requests to be sent
   without setting up a connection.

   Unlike HTTP, RTSP allows the media server to send requests to the
   media client. However, this is only supported for persistent
   connections, as the media server otherwise has no reliable way of
   reaching the client. Also, this is the only way that requests from
   media server to client are likely to traverse firewalls.

9.1 Pipelining

   A client that supports persistent connections or connectionless mode
   MAY ``pipeline'' its requests (i.e., send multiple requests without
   waiting for each response). A server MUST send its responses to those
   requests in the same order that the requests were received.

9.2 Reliability and Acknowledgements

   Requests are acknowledged by the receiver unless they are sent to a
   multicast group. If there is no acknowledgement, the sender may resend
   the same message after a timeout of one round-trip time (RTT). The
   round-trip time is estimated as in TCP (RFC 1123) [18], with an
   initial round-trip value of 500 ms. An implementation MAY cache the
   last RTT measurement as the initial value for future connections.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 30

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   If a reliable transport protocol is used to carry RTSP, requests
   SHOULD NOT be retransmitted; the RTSP application SHOULD instead rely
   on the underlying transport to provide reliability.

     If both the underlying reliable transport such as TCP and the RTSP
     application retransmit requests, it is possible that each packet
     loss results in two retransmissions. The receiver cannot typically
     take advantage of the application-layer retransmission since the
     transport stack will not deliver the application-layer
     retransmission before the first attempt has reached the receiver.
     If the packet loss is caused by congestion, multiple
     retransmissions at different layers will exacerbate the congestion.

     If RTSP is used over a small-RTT LAN, standard procedures for
     optimizing inital TCP round trip estimates, such as those used in
     T/TCP (RFC 1644) [22], can be beneficial.

   The Timestamp header (Section 12.38) is used to avoid the
   retransmission ambiguity problem [23, p. 301] and obviates the need
   for Karn's algorithm.

   Each request carries a sequence number in the CSeq header
   (Section 12.17), which is incremented by one for each distinct request
   transmitted. If a request is repeated because of lack of
   acknowledgement, the request MUST carry the original sequence number
   (i.e. sequence number is not incremented).

   Systems implementing RTSP MUST support carrying RTSP over TCP and MAY
   support UDP. The default port for the RTSP server is 554 for both UDP
   and TCP.

   A number of RTSP packets destined for the same control end point may
   be packed into a single lower-layer PDU or encapsulated into a TCP
   stream. RTSP data MAY be interleaved with RTP and RTCP packets. Unlike
   HTTP, an RTSP message MUST contain a Content-Length header whenever
   that message contains a payload. Otherwise, an RTSP packet is
   terminated with an empty line immediately following the last message

10 Method Definitions

     The method token indicates the method to be performed on the
   resource identified by the Request-URI. The method is case-sensitive.
   New methods may be defined in the future. Method names may not start
   with a $ character (decimal 24) and must be a token. Methods are
   summarized in Table 2.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 31

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

      method            direction        object     requirement
      DESCRIBE          C->S             P,S        recommended
      ANNOUNCE          C->S, S->C       P,S        optional
      GET_PARAMETER     C->S, S->C       P,S        optional
      OPTIONS           C->S, S->C       P,S        required
                                                    (S->C: optional)
      PAUSE             C->S             P,S        recommended
      PLAY              C->S             P,S        required
      RECORD            C->S             P,S        optional
      REDIRECT          S->C             P,S        optional
      SETUP             C->S             S          required
      SET_PARAMETER     C->S, S->C       P,S        optional
      TEARDOWN          C->S             P,S        required

      Table 2: Overview of RTSP methods, their direction, and what
      objects (P: presentation, S: stream) they operate on

   Notes on Table 2: PAUSE is recommended, but not required in that a
   fully functional server can be built that does not support this
   method, for example, for live feeds. If a server does not support a
   particular method, it MUST return "501 Not Implemented" and a client
   SHOULD not try this method again for this server.


     The behavior is equivalent to that described in [H9.2]. An OPTIONS
   request may be issued at any time, e.g., if the client is about to try
   a nonstandard request. It does not influence server state.


     C->S:  OPTIONS * RTSP/1.0
            CSeq: 1
            Require: implicit-play
            Proxy-Require: gzipped-messages

     S->C:  RTSP/1.0 200 OK
            CSeq: 1

   Note that these are necessarily fictional features (one would hope
   that we would not purposefully overlook a truly useful feature just so
   that we could have a strong example in this section).

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 32

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998


     The DESCRIBE method retrieves the description of a presentation or
   media object identified by the request URL from a server. It may use
   the Accept header to specify the description formats that the client
   understands. The server responds with a description of the requested
   resource. The DESCRIBE reply-response pair constitutes the media
   initialization phase of RTSP.


     C->S: DESCRIBE rtsp://server.example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 312
           Accept: application/sdp, application/rtsl, application/mheg

     S->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 312
           Date: 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
           Content-Type: application/sdp
           Content-Length: 376

           o=mhandley 2890844526 2890842807 IN IP4
           s=SDP Seminar
           i=A Seminar on the session description protocol
           e=mjh@isi.edu (Mark Handley)
           c=IN IP4
           t=2873397496 2873404696
           m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0
           m=video 2232 RTP/AVP 31
           m=whiteboard 32416 UDP WB

   The DESCRIBE response MUST contain all media initialization
   information for the resource(s) that it describes. If a media client
   obtains a presentation description from a source other than DESCRIBE
   and that description contains a complete set of media initialization
   parameters, the client SHOULD use those parameters and not then
   request a description for the same media via RTSP.

   Additionally, servers SHOULD NOT use the DESCRIBE response as a means
   of media indirection.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 33

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     Clear ground rules need to be established so that clients have an
     unambiguous means of knowing when to request media initialization
     information via DESCRIBE, and when not to. By forcing a DESCRIBE
     response to contain all media initialization for the set of streams
     that it describes, and discouraging use of DESCRIBE for media
     indirection, we avoid looping problems that might result from other

     Media initialization is a requirement for any RTSP-based system,
     but the RTSP specification does not dictate that this must be done
     via the DESCRIBE method. There are three ways that an RTSP client
     may receive initialization information:

     * via RTSP's DESCRIBE method;
     * via some other protocol (HTTP, email attachment, etc.);
     * via the command line or standard input (thus working as a browser
       helper application launched with an SDP file or other media
       initialization format).

     In the interest of practical interoperability, it is highly
     recommended that minimal servers support the DESCRIBE method, and
     highly recommended that minimal clients support the ability to act
     as a ``helper application'' that accepts a media initialization
     file from standard input, command line, and/or other means that are
     appropriate to the operating environment of the client.


     The ANNOUNCE method serves two purposes:

   When sent from client to server, ANNOUNCE posts the description of a
   presentation or media object identified by the request URL to a
   server. When sent from server to client, ANNOUNCE updates the session
   description in real-time.

   If a new media stream is added to a presentation (e.g., during a live
   presentation), the whole presentation description should be sent
   again, rather than just the additional components, so that components
   can be deleted.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 34

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998


     C->S: ANNOUNCE rtsp://server.example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 312
           Date: 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
           Session: 4711
           Content-Type: application/sdp
           Content-Length: 332

           o=mhandley 2890844526 2890845468 IN IP4
           s=SDP Seminar
           i=A Seminar on the session description protocol
           e=mjh@isi.edu (Mark Handley)
           c=IN IP4
           t=2873397496 2873404696
           m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0
           m=video 2232 RTP/AVP 31

     S->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 312

10.4 SETUP

     The SETUP request for a URI specifies the transport mechanism to be
   used for the streamed media. A client can issue a SETUP request for a
   stream that is already playing to change transport parameters, which a
   server MAY allow. If it does not allow this, it MUST respond with
   error ``455 Method Not Valid In This State''. For the benefit of any
   intervening firewalls, a client must indicate the transport parameters
   even if it has no influence over these parameters, for example, where
   the server advertises a fixed multicast address.

     Since SETUP includes all transport initialization information,
     firewalls and other intermediate network devices (which need this
     information) are spared the more arduous task of parsing the
     DESCRIBE response, which has been reserved for media

   The Transport header specifies the transport parameters acceptable to
   the client for data transmission; the response will contain the
   transport parameters selected by the server.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 35

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

    C->S: SETUP rtsp://example.com/foo/bar/baz.rm RTSP/1.0
          CSeq: 302
          Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;client_port=4588-4589

    S->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
          CSeq: 302
          Date: 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
          Session: 4711
          Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;

10.5 PLAY

     The PLAY method tells the server to start sending data via the
   mechanism specified in SETUP. A client MUST NOT issue a PLAY request
   until any outstanding SETUP requests have been acknowledged as

   The PLAY request positions the normal play time to the beginning of
   the range specified and delivers stream data until the end of the
   range is reached. PLAY requests may be pipelined (queued); a server
   MUST queue PLAY requests to be executed in order. That is, a PLAY
   request arriving while a previous PLAY request is still active is
   delayed until the first has been completed.

     This allows precise editing.

   For example, regardless of how closely spaced the two PLAY requests in
   the example below arrive, the server will first play seconds 10
   through 15, then, immediately following, seconds 20 to 25, and finally
   seconds 30 through the end.

     C->S: PLAY rtsp://audio.example.com/audio RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 835
           Range: npt=10-15

     C->S: PLAY rtsp://audio.example.com/audio RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 836
           Range: npt=20-25

     C->S: PLAY rtsp://audio.example.com/audio RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 837
           Range: npt=30-

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 36

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   See the description of the PAUSE request for further examples.

   A PLAY request without a Range header is legal. It starts playing a
   stream from the beginning unless the stream has been paused. If a
   stream has been paused via PAUSE, stream delivery resumes at the pause
   point. If a stream is playing, such a PLAY request causes no further
   action and can be used by the client to test server liveness.

   The Range header may also contain a time parameter. This parameter
   specifies a time in UTC at which the playback should start. If the
   message is received after the specified time, playback is started
   immediately. The time parameter may be used to aid in synchronization
   of streams obtained from different sources.

   For a on-demand stream, the server replies with the actual range that
   will be played back. This may differ from the requested range if
   alignment of the requested range to valid frame boundaries is required
   for the media source. If no range is specified in the request, the
   current position is returned in the reply. The unit of the range in
   the reply is the same as that in the request.

   After playing the desired range, the presentation is automatically
   paused, as if a PAUSE request had been issued.

   The following example plays the whole presentation starting at SMPTE
   time code 0:10:20 until the end of the clip. The playback is to start
   at 15:36 on 23 Jan 1997.

     C->S: PLAY rtsp://audio.example.com/twister.en RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 833
           Range: smpte=0:10:20-;time=19970123T153600Z

     S->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 833
           Date: 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT
           Range: smpte=0:10:22-;time=19970123T153600Z

   For playing back a recording of a live presentation, it may be
   desirable to use clock units:

     C->S: PLAY rtsp://audio.example.com/meeting.en RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 835
           Range: clock=19961108T142300Z-19961108T143520Z

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 37

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     S->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 835
           Date: 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT

   A media server only supporting playback MUST support the npt format
   and MAY support the clock and smpte formats.

10.6 PAUSE

     The PAUSE request causes the stream delivery to be interrupted
   (halted) temporarily. If the request URL names a stream, only playback
   and recording of that stream is halted. For example, for audio, this
   is equivalent to muting. If the request URL names a presentation or
   group of streams, delivery of all currently active streams within the
   presentation or group is halted. After resuming playback or recording,
   synchronization of the tracks MUST be maintained. Any server resources
   are kept, though servers MAY close the session and free resources
   after being paused for the duration specified with the timeout
   parameter of the Session header in the SETUP message.


     C->S: PAUSE rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 834
           Session: 1234

     S->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 834
           Date: 23 Jan 1997 15:35:06 GMT

   The PAUSE request may contain a Range header specifying when the
   stream or presentation is to be halted. The header must contain
   exactly one value rather than a time range. The normal play time for
   the stream is set to that value. The pause request becomes effective
   the first time the server is encountering the time point specified in
   any of the currently pending PLAY requests. If the Range header
   specifies a time outside any currently pending PLAY requests, the
   error ``457 Invalid Range'' is returned. If this header is missing,
   stream delivery is interrupted immediately on receipt of the message.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 38

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   For example, if the server has play requests for ranges 10 to 15 and
   20 to 29 pending and then receives a pause request for NPT 21, it
   would start playing the second range and stop at NPT 21. If the pause
   request is for NPT 12 and the server is playing at NPT 13 serving the
   first play request, the server stops immediately. If the pause request
   is for NPT 16, the server stops after completing the first play
   request and discards the second play request.

   As another example, if a server has received requests to play ranges
   10 to 15 and then 13 to 20 (that is, overlapping ranges), the PAUSE
   request for NPT=14 would take effect while the server plays the first
   range, with the second PLAY request effectively being ignored,
   assuming the PAUSE request arrives before the server has started
   playing the second, overlapping range. Regardless of when the PAUSE
   request arrives, it sets the NPT to 14.

   If the server has already sent data beyond the time specified in the
   Range header, a PLAY would still resume at that point in time, as it
   is assumed that the client has discarded data after that point. This
   ensures continuous pause/play cycling without gaps.


     The TEARDOWN request stops the stream delivery for the given URI,
   freeing the resources associated with it. If the URI is the
   presentation URI for this presentation, any RTSP session identifier
   associated with the session is no longer valid. Unless all transport
   parameters are defined by the session description, a SETUP request has
   to be issued before the session can be played again.

     C->S: TEARDOWN rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 892
           Session: 1234
     S->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 892


     The GET_PARAMETER request retrieves the value of a parameter of a
   presentation or stream specified in the URI. The content of the reply
   and response is left to the implementation. GET_PARAMETER with no
   entity body may be used to test client or server liveness (``ping'').

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 39

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998


     S->C: GET_PARAMETER rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 431
           Content-Type: text/parameters
           Session: 1234
           Content-Length: 15


     C->S: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 431
           Content-Length: 46
           Content-Type: text/parameters

           packets_received: 10
           jitter: 0.3838

     The ``text/parameters'' section is only an example type for
     parameter. This method is intentionally loosely defined with the
     intention that the reply content and response content will be
     defined after further experimentation.


     This method requests to set the value of a parameter for a
   presentation or stream specified by the URI.

   A request SHOULD only contain a single parameter to allow the client
   to determine why a particular request failed. If the request contains
   several parameters, the server MUST only act on the request if all of
   the parameters can be set successfully. A server MUST allow a
   parameter to be set repeatedly to the same value, but it MAY disallow
   changing parameter values.

   Note: transport parameters for the media stream MUST only be set with
   the SETUP command.

     Restricting setting transport parameters to SETUP is for the
     benefit of firewalls.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 40

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     The parameters are split in a fine-grained fashion so that there
     can be more meaningful error indications. However, it may make
     sense to allow the setting of several parameters if an atomic
     setting is desirable. Imagine device control where the client does
     not want the camera to pan unless it can also tilt to the right
     angle at the same time.


     C->S: SET_PARAMETER rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 421
           Content-length: 20
           Content-type: text/parameters

           barparam: barstuff

     S->C: RTSP/1.0 451 Invalid Parameter
           CSeq: 421
           Content-length: 10
           Content-type: text/parameters


     The ``text/parameters'' section is only an example type for
     parameter. This method is intentionally loosely defined with the
     intention that the reply content and response content will be
     defined after further experimentation.


     A redirect request informs the client that it must connect to
   another server location. It contains the mandatory header Location,
   which indicates that the client should issue requests for that URL. It
   may contain the parameter Range, which indicates when the redirection
   takes effect. If the client wants to continue to send or receive media
   for this URI, the client MUST issue a TEARDOWN request for the current
   session and a SETUP for the new session at the designated host.

   This example request redirects traffic for this URI to the new server
   at the given play time:

     S->C: REDIRECT rtsp://example.com/fizzle/foo RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 732
           Location: rtsp://bigserver.com:8001
           Range: clock=19960213T143205Z-

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 41

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

10.11 RECORD

     This method initiates recording a range of media data according to
   the presentation description. The timestamp reflects start and end
   time (UTC). If no time range is given, use the start or end time
   provided in the presentation description. If the session has already
   started, commence recording immediately.

   The server decides whether to store the recorded data under the
   request-URI or another URI. If the server does not use the
   request-URI, the response SHOULD be 201 (Created) and contain an
   entity which describes the status of the request and refers to the new
   resource, and a Location header.

   A media server supporting recording of live presentations MUST support
   the clock range format; the smpte format does not make sense.

   In this example, the media server was previously invited to the
   conference indicated.

     C->S: RECORD rtsp://example.com/meeting/audio.en RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 954
           Session: 1234

10.12 Embedded (Interleaved) Binary Data

     Certain firewall designs and other circumstances may force a server
   to interleave RTSP methods and stream data. This interleaving should
   generally be avoided unless necessary since it complicates client and
   server operation and imposes additional overhead. Interleaved binary
   data SHOULD only be used if RTSP is carried over TCP.

   Stream data such as RTP packets is encapsulated by an ASCII dollar
   sign (24 decimal), followed by a one-byte channel identifier, followed
   by the length of the encapsulated binary data as a binary, two-byte
   integer in network byte order. The stream data follows immediately
   afterwards, without a CRLF, but including the upper-layer protocol
   headers. Each $ block contains exactly one upper-layer protocol data
   unit, e.g., one RTP packet.

   The channel identifier is defined in the Transport header with the
   interleaved parameter(Section 12.39).

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 42

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   When the transport choice is RTP, RTCP messages are also interleaved
   by the server over the TCP connection. As a default, RTCP packets are
   sent on the first available channel higher than the RTP channel. The
   client MAY explicitly request RTCP packets on another channel. This is
   done by specifying two channels in the interleaved parameter of the
   Transport header(Section 12.39).

     RTCP is needed for synchronization when two or more streams are
     interleaved in such a fashion. Also, this provides a convenient way
     to tunnel RTP/RTCP packets through the TCP control connection when
     required by the network configuration and transfer them onto UDP
     when possible.

     C->S: SETUP rtsp://foo.com/bar.file RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 2
           Transport: RTP/AVP/TCP;interleaved=0-1

     S->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 2
           Date: 05 Jun 1997 18:57:18 GMT
           Transport: RTP/AVP/TCP;interleaved=0-1
           Session: 12345

     C->S: PLAY rtsp://foo.com/bar.file RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 3
           Session: 12345

     S->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 3
           Session: 12345
           Date: 05 Jun 1997 18:59:15 GMT
           RTP-Info: url=rtsp://foo.com/bar.file;

     S->C: $\000{2 byte length}{"length" bytes data, w/RTP header}
     S->C: $\000{2 byte length}{"length" bytes data, w/RTP header}
     S->C: $\001{2 byte length}{"length" bytes  RTCP packet}

11 Status Code Definitions

     Where applicable, HTTP status [H10] codes are reused. Status codes
   that have the same meaning are not repeated here. See Table 1 for a
   listing of which status codes may be returned by which requests.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 43

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

11.1 Success 2xx

  11.1.1 250 Low on Storage Space

   The server returns this warning after receiving a RECORD request that
   it may not be able to fulfill completely due to insufficient storage
   space. If possible, the server should use the Range header to indicate
   what time period it may still be able to record. Since other processes
   on the server may be consuming storage space simultaneously, a client
   should take this only as an estimate.

11.2 Redirection 3xx

   See [H10.3].

   Within RTSP, redirection may be used for load balancing or redirecting
   stream requests to a server topologically closer to the client.
   Mechanisms to determine topological proximity are beyond the scope of
   this specification.

11.3 Client Error 4xx

  11.3.1 405 Method Not Allowed

   The method specified in the request is not allowed for the resource
   identified by the request URI. The response MUST include an Allow
   header containing a list of valid methods for the requested resource.
   This status code is also to be used if a request attempts to use a
   method not indicated during SETUP, e.g., if a RECORD request is issued
   even though the mode parameter in the Transport header only specified

  11.3.2 451 Parameter Not Understood

   The recipient of the request does not support one or more parameters
   contained in the request.

  11.3.3 452 Conference Not Found

   The conference indicated by a Conference header field is unknown to
   the media server.

  11.3.4 453 Not Enough Bandwidth

   The request was refused because there was insufficient bandwidth. This
   may, for example, be the result of a resource reservation failure.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 44

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

  11.3.5 454 Session Not Found

   The RTSP session identifier in the Session header is missing, invalid,
   or has timed out.

  11.3.6 455 Method Not Valid in This State

   The client or server cannot process this request in its current state.
   The response SHOULD contain an Allow header to make error recovery

  11.3.7 456 Header Field Not Valid for Resource

   The server could not act on a required request header. For example, if
   PLAY contains the Range header field but the stream does not allow

  11.3.8 457 Invalid Range

   The Range value given is out of bounds, e.g., beyond the end of the

  11.3.9 458 Parameter Is Read-Only

   The parameter to be set by SET_PARAMETER can be read but not modified.

  11.3.10 459 Aggregate Operation Not Allowed

   The requested method may not be applied on the URL in question since
   it is an aggregate (presentation) URL. The method may be applied on a
   stream URL.

  11.3.11 460 Only Aggregate Operation Allowed

   The requested method may not be applied on the URL in question since
   it is not an aggregate (presentation) URL. The method may be applied
   on the presentation URL.

  11.3.12 461 Unsupported Transport

   The Transport field did not contain a supported transport

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 45

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

  11.3.13 462 Destination Unreachable

   The data transmission channel could not be established because the
   client address could not be reached. This error will most likely be
   the result of a client attempt to place an invalid Destination
   parameter in the Transport field.

  11.3.14 551 Option not supported

   An option given in the Require or the Proxy-Require fields was not
   supported. The Unsupported header should be returned stating the
   option for which there is no support.

12 Header Field Definitions

     HTTP/1.1 [2] or other, non-standard header fields not listed here
   currently have no well-defined meaning and SHOULD be ignored by the

   Table 3 summarizes the header fields used by RTSP. Type ``g''
   designates general request headers to be found in both requests and
   responses, type ``R'' designates request headers, type ``r''
   designates response headers, and type ``e'' designates entity header
   fields. Fields marked with ``req.'' in the column labeled ``support''
   MUST be implemented by the recipient for a particular method, while
   fields marked ``opt.'' are optional. Note that not all fields marked
   ``req.'' will be sent in every request of this type. The ``req.''
   means only that client (for response headers) and server (for request
   headers) MUST implement the fields. The last column lists the method
   for which this header field is meaningful; the designation ``entity''
   refers to all methods that return a message body. Within this
   specification, DESCRIBE and GET_PARAMETER fall into this class.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 46

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   Header               type   support   methods
   Accept               R      opt.      entity
   Accept-Encoding      R      opt.      entity
   Accept-Language      R      opt.      all
   Allow                r      opt.      all
   Authorization        R      opt.      all
   Bandwidth            R      opt.      all
   Blocksize            R      opt.      all but OPTIONS, TEARDOWN
   Cache-Control        g      opt.      SETUP
   Conference           R      opt.      SETUP
   Connection           g      req.      all
   Content-Base         e      opt.      entity
   Content-Encoding     e      req.      SET_PARAMETER
   Content-Encoding     e      req.      DESCRIBE, ANNOUNCE
   Content-Language     e      req.      DESCRIBE, ANNOUNCE
   Content-Length       e      req.      SET_PARAMETER, ANNOUNCE
   Content-Length       e      req.      entity
   Content-Location     e      opt.      entity
   Content-Type         e      req.      SET_PARAMETER, ANNOUNCE
   Content-Type         r      req.      entity
   CSeq                 g      req.      all
   Date                 g      opt.      all
   Expires              e      opt.      DESCRIBE, ANNOUNCE
   From                 R      opt.      all
   If-Modified-Since    R      opt.      DESCRIBE, SETUP
   Last-Modified        e      opt.      entity
   Proxy-Require        R      req.      all
   Public               r      opt.      all
   Range                R      opt.      PLAY, PAUSE, RECORD
   Range                r      opt.      PLAY, PAUSE, RECORD
   Referer              R      opt.      all
   Require              R      req.      all
   Retry-After          r      opt.      all
   RTP-Info             r      req.      PLAY
   Scale                Rr     opt.      PLAY, RECORD
   Session              Rr     req.      all but SETUP, OPTIONS
   Server               r      opt.      all
   Speed                Rr     opt.      PLAY
   Transport            Rr     req.      SETUP
   Unsupported          r      req.      all
   User-Agent           R      opt.      all
   Via                  g      opt.      all
   WWW-Authenticate     r      opt.      all

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 47

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   Overview of RTSP header fields

12.1 Accept

     The Accept request-header field can be used to specify certain
   presentation description content types which are acceptable for the

     The ``level'' parameter for presentation descriptions is properly
     defined as part of the MIME type registration, not here.

   See [H14.1] for syntax.

   Example of use:
     Accept: application/rtsl, application/sdp;level=2

12.2 Accept-Encoding

     See [H14.3]

12.3 Accept-Language

     See [H14.4]. Note that the language specified applies to the
   presentation description and any reason phrases, not the media

12.4 Allow

     The Allow response header field lists the methods supported by the
   resource identified by the request-URI. The purpose of this field is
   to strictly inform the recipient of valid methods associated with the
   resource. An Allow header field must be present in a 405 (Method not
   allowed) response.

   Example of use:

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 48

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

12.5 Authorization

     See [H14.8]

12.6 Bandwidth

     The Bandwidth request header field describes the estimated bandwidth
   available to the client, expressed as a positive integer and measured
   in bits per second. The bandwidth available to the client may change
   during an RTSP session, e.g., due to modem retraining.

   Bandwidth = "Bandwidth" ":" 1*DIGIT

     Bandwidth: 4000

12.7 Blocksize

     This request header field is sent from the client to the media
   server asking the server for a particular media packet size. This
   packet size does not include lower-layer headers such as IP, UDP, or
   RTP. The server is free to use a blocksize which is lower than the one
   requested. The server MAY truncate this packet size to the closest
   multiple of the minimum, media-specific block size, or override it
   with the media-specific size if necessary. The block size MUST be a
   positive decimal number, measured in octets. The server only returns
   an error (416) if the value is syntactically invalid.

12.8 Cache-Control

     The Cache-Control general header field is used to specify directives
   that MUST be obeyed by all caching mechanisms along the
   request/response chain.

   Cache directives must be passed through by a proxy or gateway
   application, regardless of their significance to that application,
   since the directives may be applicable to all recipients along the
   request/response chain. It is not possible to specify a cache-
   directive for a specific cache.

   Cache-Control should only be specified in a SETUP request and its
   response. Note: Cache-Control does not govern the caching of responses
   as for HTTP, but rather of the stream identified by the SETUP request.
   Responses to RTSP requests are not cacheable, except for responses to

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 49

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   Cache-Control            =   "Cache-Control" ":" 1#cache-directive
   cache-directive          =   cache-request-directive
                            |   cache-response-directive
   cache-request-directive  =   "no-cache"
                            |   "max-stale"
                            |   "min-fresh"
                            |   "only-if-cached"
                            |   cache-extension
   cache-response-directive =   "public"
                            |   "private"
                            |   "no-cache"
                            |   "no-transform"
                            |   "must-revalidate"
                            |   "proxy-revalidate"
                            |   "max-age" "=" delta-seconds
                            |   cache-extension
   cache-extension          =   token [ "=" ( token | quoted-string ) ]

          Indicates that the media stream MUST NOT be cached anywhere.
          This allows an origin server to prevent caching even by caches
          that have been configured to return stale responses to client

          Indicates that the media stream is cacheable by any cache.

          Indicates that the media stream is intended for a single user
          and MUST NOT be cached by a shared cache. A private
          (non-shared) cache may cache the media stream.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 50

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          An intermediate cache (proxy) may find it useful to convert the
          media type of a certain stream. A proxy might, for example,
          convert between video formats to save cache space or to reduce
          the amount of traffic on a slow link. Serious operational
          problems may occur, however, when these transformations have
          been applied to streams intended for certain kinds of
          applications. For example, applications for medical imaging,
          scientific data analysis and those using end-to-end
          authentication all depend on receiving a stream that is
          bit-for-bit identical to the original entity-body. Therefore,
          if a response includes the no-transform directive, an
          intermediate cache or proxy MUST NOT change the encoding of the
          stream. Unlike HTTP, RTSP does not provide for partial
          transformation at this point, e.g., allowing translation into a
          different language.

          In some cases, such as times of extremely poor network
          connectivity, a client may want a cache to return only those
          media streams that it currently has stored, and not to receive
          these from the origin server. To do this, the client may
          include the only-if-cached directive in a request. If it
          receives this directive, a cache SHOULD either respond using a
          cached media stream that is consistent with the other
          constraints of the request, or respond with a 504 (Gateway
          Timeout) status. However, if a group of caches is being
          operated as a unified system with good internal connectivity,
          such a request MAY be forwarded within that group of caches.

          Indicates that the client is willing to accept a media stream
          that has exceeded its expiration time. If max-stale is assigned
          a value, then the client is willing to accept a response that
          has exceeded its expiration time by no more than the specified
          number of seconds. If no value is assigned to max-stale, then
          the client is willing to accept a stale response of any age.

          Indicates that the client is willing to accept a media stream
          whose freshness lifetime is no less than its current age plus
          the specified time in seconds. That is, the client wants a
          response that will still be fresh for at least the specified
          number of seconds.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 51

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          When the must-revalidate directive is present in a SETUP
          response received by a cache, that cache MUST NOT use the entry
          after it becomes stale to respond to a subsequent request
          without first revalidating it with the origin server. That is,
          the cache must do an end-to-end revalidation every time, if,
          based solely on the origin server's Expires, the cached
          response is stale.)

12.9 Conference

     This request header field establishes a logical connection between a
   pre-established conference and an RTSP stream. The conference-id must
   not be changed for the same RTSP session.

   Conference = "Conference" ":" conference-id

     Conference: 199702170042.SAA08642@obiwan.arl.wustl.edu%20Starr

   A response code of 452 (452 Conference Not Found) is returned if the
   conference-id is not valid.

12.10 Connection

     See [H14.10]

12.11 Content-Base

     See [H14.11]

12.12 Content-Encoding

     See [H14.12]

12.13 Content-Language

     See [H14.13]

12.14 Content-Length

     This field contains the length of the content of the method (i.e.
   after the double CRLF following the last header). Unlike HTTP, it MUST
   be included in all messages that carry content beyond the header
   portion of the message. If it is missing, a default value of zero is
   assumed. It is interpreted according to [H14.14].

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 52

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

12.15 Content-Location

     See [H14.15]

12.16 Content-Type

     See [H14.18]. Note that the content types suitable for RTSP are
   likely to be restricted in practice to presentation descriptions and
   parameter-value types.

12.17 CSeq

     The CSeq field specifies the sequence number for an RTSP
   request-response pair. This field MUST be present in all requests and
   responses. For every RTSP request containing the given sequence
   number, there will be a corresponding response having the same number.
   Any retransmitted request must contain the same sequence number as the
   original (i.e. the sequence number is not incremented for
   retransmissions of the same request).

12.18 Date

     See [H14.19].

12.19 Expires

     The Expires entity-header field gives a date and time after which
   the description or media-stream should be considered stale. The
   interpretation depends on the method:

   DESCRIBE response:
          The Expires header indicates a date and time after which the
          description should be considered stale.

   A stale cache entry may not normally be returned by a cache (either a
   proxy cache or an user agent cache) unless it is first validated with
   the origin server (or with an intermediate cache that has a fresh copy
   of the entity). See section 13 for further discussion of the
   expiration model.

   The presence of an Expires field does not imply that the original
   resource will change or cease to exist at, before, or after that time.

   The format is an absolute date and time as defined by HTTP-date in
   [H3.3]; it MUST be in RFC1123-date format:

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 53

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   Expires = "Expires" ":" HTTP-date

   An example of its use is

     Expires: Thu, 01 Dec 1994 16:00:00 GMT

   RTSP/1.0 clients and caches MUST treat other invalid date formats,
   especially including the value "0", as having occured in the past
   (i.e., ``already expired'').

   To mark a response as ``already expired,'' an origin server should use
   an Expires date that is equal to the Date header value. To mark a
   response as ``never expires,'' an origin server should use an Expires
   date approximately one year from the time the response is sent.
   RTSP/1.0 servers should not send Expires dates more than one year in
   the future.

   The presence of an Expires header field with a date value of some time
   in the future on a media stream that otherwise would by default be
   non-cacheable indicates that the media stream is cacheable, unless
   indicated otherwise by a Cache-Control header field (Section 12.8).

12.20 From

     See [H14.22].

12.21 Host

     This HTTP request header field is not needed for RTSP. It should be
   silently ignored if sent.

12.22 If-Match

     See [H14.25].

   This field is especially useful for ensuring the integrity of the
   presentation description, in both the case where it is fetched via
   means external to RTSP (such as HTTP), or in the case where the server
   implementation is guaranteeing the integrity of the description
   between the time of the DESCRIBE message and the SETUP message.

   The identifier is an opaque identifier, and thus is not specific to
   any particular session description language.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 54

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

12.23 If-Modified-Since

     The If-Modified-Since request-header field is used with the DESCRIBE
   and SETUP methods to make them conditional. If the requested variant
   has not been modified since the time specified in this field, a
   description will not be returned from the server (DESCRIBE) or a
   stream will not be set up (SETUP). Instead, a 304 (not modified)
   response will be returned without any message-body.

   If-Modified-Since = "If-Modified-Since" ":" HTTP-date

   An example of the field is:

     If-Modified-Since: Sat, 29 Oct 1994 19:43:31 GMT

12.24 Last-Modified

     The Last-Modified entity-header field indicates the date and time at
   which the origin server believes the presentation description or media
   stream was last modified. See [H14.29]. For the methods DESCRIBE or
   ANNOUNCE, the header field indicates the last modification date and
   time of the description, for SETUP that of the media stream.

12.25 Location

     See [H14.30].

12.26 Proxy-Authenticate

     See [H14.33].

12.27 Proxy-Require

     The Proxy-Require header is used to indicate proxy-sensitive
   features that MUST be supported by the proxy. Any Proxy-Require header
   features that are not supported by the proxy MUST be negatively
   acknowledged by the proxy to the client if not supported. Servers
   should treat this field identically to the Require field.

   See Section 12.32 for more details on the mechanics of this message
   and a usage example.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 55

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

12.28 Public

     See [H14.35].

12.29 Range

     This request and response header field specifies a range of time.
   The range can be specified in a number of units. This specification
   defines the smpte (Section 3.5), npt (Section 3.6), and clock
   (Section 3.7) range units. Within RTSP, byte ranges [H14.36.1] are not
   meaningful and MUST NOT be used. The header may also contain a time
   parameter in UTC, specifying the time at which the operation is to be
   made effective. Servers supporting the Range header MUST understand
   the NPT range format and SHOULD understand the SMPTE range format. The
   Range response header indicates what range of time is actually being
   played or recorded. If the Range header is given in a time format that
   is not understood, the recipient should return ``501 Not

   Range            = "Range" ":" 1#ranges-specifier
                       [ ";" "time" "=" utc-time ]
   ranges-specifier = npt-range | utc-range | smpte-range

     Range: clock=19960213T143205Z-;time=19970123T143720Z

     The notation is similar to that used for the HTTP/1.1 [2]
     byte-range header. It allows clients to select an excerpt from the
     media object, and to play from a given point to the end as well as
     from the current location to a given point. The start of playback
     can be scheduled for any time in the future, although a server may
     refuse to keep server resources for extended idle periods.

12.30 Referer

     See [H14.37]. The URL refers to that of the presentation
   description, typically retrieved via HTTP.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 56

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

12.31 Retry-After

     See [H14.38].

12.32 Require

     The Require header is used by clients to query the server about
   options that it may or may not support. The server MUST respond to
   this header by using the Unsupported header to negatively acknowledge
   those options which are NOT supported.

     This is to make sure that the client-server interaction will
     proceed without delay when all options are understood by both
     sides, and only slow down if options are not understood (as in the
     case above). For a well-matched client-server pair, the interaction
     proceeds quickly, saving a round-trip often required by negotiation
     mechanisms. In addition, it also removes state ambiguity when the
     client requires features that the server does not understand.

   Require =   "Require" ":"  1#option-tag

     C->S:   SETUP rtsp://server.com/foo/bar/baz.rm RTSP/1.0
             CSeq: 302
             Require: funky-feature
             Funky-Parameter: funkystuff

     S->C:   RTSP/1.0 551 Option not supported
             CSeq: 302
             Unsupported: funky-feature

     C->S:   SETUP rtsp://server.com/foo/bar/baz.rm RTSP/1.0
             CSeq: 303

     S->C:   RTSP/1.0 200 OK
             CSeq: 303

   In this example, ``funky-feature'' is the feature tag which indicates
   to the client that the fictional Funky-Parameter field is required.
   The relationship between ``funky-feature'' and Funky-Parameter is not
   communicated via the RTSP exchange, since that relationship is an
   immutable property of ``funky-feature'' and thus should not be
   transmitted with every exchange.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 57

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   Proxies and other intermediary devices SHOULD ignore features that are
   not understood in this field. If a particular extension requires that
   intermediate devices support it, the extension should be tagged in the
   Proxy-Require field instead (see Section 3.4).

12.33 RTP-Info

     This field is used to set RTP-specific parameters in the PLAY

          Indicates the stream URL which for which the following RTP
          parameters correspond.

          Indicates the sequence number of the first packet of the
          stream. This allows clients to gracefully deal with packets
          when seeking. The client uses this value to differentiate
          packets that originated before the seek from packets that
          originated after the seek.

          Indicates the RTP timestamp of the first packet of the stream.
          The client uses this value to calculate the mapping of RTP time
          to NPT.

     A mapping from RTP timestamps to NTP timestamps (wall clock) is
     available via RTCP. However, this information is not sufficient to
     generate a mapping from RTP timestamps to NPT. Furthermore, in
     order to ensure that this information is available at the necessary
     time (immediately at startup or after a seek), and that it is
     delivered reliably, this mapping is placed in the RTSP control

     In order to compensate for drift for long, uninterrupted
     presentations, RTSP clients should additionally map NPT to NTP,
     using initial RTCP sender reports to do the mapping, and later
     reports to check drift against the mapping.


   RTP-Info        = "RTP-Info" ":" 1#stream-url 1*parameter
   stream-url      = "url" "=" url
   parameter       = ";" "seq" "=" 1*DIGIT
                   | ";" "rtptime" "=" 1*DIGIT

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 58

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998


     RTP-Info: url=rtsp://foo.com/bar.avi/streamid=0;seq=45102,

12.34 Scale

     A scale value of 1 indicates normal play or record at the normal
   forward viewing rate. If not 1, the value corresponds to the rate with
   respect to normal viewing rate. For example, a ratio of 2 indicates
   twice the normal viewing rate (``fast forward'') and a ratio of 0.5
   indicates half the normal viewing rate. In other words, a ratio of 2
   has normal play time increase at twice the wallclock rate. For every
   second of elapsed (wallclock) time, 2 seconds of content will be
   delivered. A negative value indicates reverse direction.

   Unless requested otherwise by the Speed parameter, the data rate
   SHOULD not be changed. Implementation of scale changes depends on the
   server and media type. For video, a server may, for example, deliver
   only key frames or selected key frames. For audio, it may time-scale
   the audio while preserving pitch or, less desirably, deliver fragments
   of audio.

   The server should try to approximate the viewing rate, but may
   restrict the range of scale values that it supports. The response MUST
   contain the actual scale value chosen by the server.

   If the request contains a Range parameter, the new scale value will
   take effect at that time.

   Scale = "Scale" ":" [ "-" ] 1*DIGIT [ "." *DIGIT ]

   Example of playing in reverse at 3.5 times normal rate:

      Scale: -3.5

12.35 Speed

     This request header fields parameter requests the server to deliver
   data to the client at a particular speed, contingent on the server's
   ability and desire to serve the media stream at the given speed.
   Implementation by the server is OPTIONAL. The default is the bit rate
   of the stream.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 59

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   The parameter value is expressed as a decimal ratio, e.g., a value of
   2.0 indicates that data is to be delivered twice as fast as normal. A
   speed of zero is invalid. If the request contains a Range parameter,
   the new speed value will take effect at that time.

   Speed = "Speed" ":" 1*DIGIT [ "." *DIGIT ]

      Speed: 2.5

   Use of this field changes the bandwidth used for data delivery. It is
   meant for use in specific circumstances where preview of the
   presentation at a higher or lower rate is necessary. Implementors
   should keep in mind that bandwidth for the session may be negotiated
   beforehand (by means other than RTSP), and therefore re-negotiation
   may be necessary. When data is delivered over UDP, it is highly
   recommended that means such as RTCP be used to track packet loss

12.36 Server

     See [H14.39]

12.37 Session

     This request and response header field identifies an RTSP session
   started by the media server in a SETUP response and concluded by
   TEARDOWN on the presentation URL. The session identifier is chosen by
   the media server (see Section 3.4). Once a client receives a Session
   identifier, it MUST return it for any request related to that session.
   A server does not have to set up a session identifier if it has other
   means of identifying a session, such as dynamically generated URLs.

   Session  = "Session" ":" session-id [ ";" "timeout" "=" delta-seconds ]

   The timeout parameter is only allowed in a response header. The server
   uses it to indicate to the client how long the server is prepared to
   wait between RTSP commands before closing the session due to lack of
   activity (see Section A). The timeout is measured in seconds, with a
   default of 60 seconds (1 minute).

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 60

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   Note that a session identifier identifies a RTSP session across
   transport sessions or connections. Control messages for more than one
   RTSP URL may be sent within a single RTSP session. Hence, it is
   possible that clients use the same session for controlling many
   streams constituting a presentation, as long as all the streams come
   from the same server. (See example in Section 14). However, multiple
   ``user'' sessions for the same URL from the same client MUST use
   different session identifiers.

     The session identifier is needed to distinguish several delivery
     requests for the same URL coming from the same client.

   The response 454 (Session Not Found) is returned if the session
   identifier is invalid.

12.38 Timestamp

     The timestamp general header describes when the client sent the
   request to the server. The value of the timestamp is of significance
   only to the client and may use any timescale. The server MUST echo the
   exact same value and MAY, if it has accurate information about this,
   add a floating point number indicating the number of seconds that has
   elapsed since it has received the request. The timestamp is used by
   the client to compute the round-trip time to the server so that it can
   adjust the timeout value for retransmissions.

   Timestamp  = "Timestamp" ":" *(DIGIT) [ "." *(DIGIT) ] [ delay ]
   delay      =  *(DIGIT) [ "." *(DIGIT) ]

12.39 Transport

     This request header indicates which transport protocol is to be used
   and configures its parameters such as destination address,
   compression, multicast time-to-live and destination port for a single
   stream. It sets those values not already determined by a presentation

   Transports are comma separated, listed in order of preference.
   Parameters may be added to each transport, separated by a semicolon.

   The Transport header MAY also be used to change certain transport
   parameters. A server MAY refuse to change parameters of an existing

   The server MAY return a Transport response header in the response to
   indicate the values actually chosen.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 61

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   A Transport request header field may contain a list of transport
   options acceptable to the client. In that case, the server MUST return
   a single option which was actually chosen.

   The syntax for the transport specifier is


   The default value for the ``lower-transport'' parameters is specific
   to the profile. For RTP/AVP, the default is UDP.

   Below are the configuration parameters associated with transport:

   General parameters:

   unicast | multicast
          : mutually exclusive indication of whether unicast or multicast
          delivery will be attempted. Default value is multicast. Clients
          that are capable of handling both unicast and multicast
          transmission MUST indicate such capability by including two
          full transport-specs with separate parameters for each.

          The address to which a stream will be sent. The client may
          specify the multicast address with the destination parameter.
          To avoid becoming the unwitting perpetrator of a
          remote-controlled denial-of-service attack, a server SHOULD
          authenticate the client and SHOULD log such attempts before
          allowing the client to direct a media stream to an address not
          chosen by the server. This is particularly important if RTSP
          commands are issued via UDP, but implementations cannot rely on
          TCP as reliable means of client identification by itself. A
          server SHOULD not allow a client to direct media streams to an
          address that differs from the address commands are coming from.

          If the source address for the stream is different than can be
          derived from the RTSP endpoint address (the server in playback
          or the client in recording), the source MAY be specified.

     This information may also be available through SDP. However, since
     this is more a feature of transport than media initialization, the
     authoritative source for this information should be in the SETUP

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 62

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          The number of multicast layers to be used for this media
          stream. The layers are sent to consecutive addresses starting
          at the destination address.

          The mode parameter indicates the methods to be supported for
          this session. Valid values are PLAY and RECORD. If not
          provided, the default is PLAY.

          If the mode parameter includes RECORD, the append parameter
          indicates that the media data should append to the existing
          resource rather than overwrite it. If appending is requested
          and the server does not support this, it MUST refuse the
          request rather than overwrite the resource identified by the
          URI. The append parameter is ignored if the mode parameter does
          not contain RECORD.

          The interleaved parameter implies mixing the media stream with
          the control stream in whatever protocol is being used by the
          control stream, using the mechanism defined in Section 10.12.
          The argument provides the channel number to be used in the $
          statement. This parameter may be specified as a range, e.g.,
          interleaved=4-5 in cases where the transport choice for the
          media stream requires it.

     This allows RTP/RTCP to be handled similarly to the way that it is
     done with UDP, i.e., one channel for RTP and the other for RTCP.

   Multicast specific:

          multicast time-to-live

   RTP Specific:

          This parameter provides the RTP/RTCP port pair for a multicast
          session. It is specified as a range, e.g., port=3456-3457.

          This parameter provides the unicast RTP/RTCP port pair on the
          client where media data and control information is to be sent.
          It is specified as a range, e.g., port=3456-3457.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 63

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          This parameter provides the unicast RTP/RTCP port pair on the
          server where media data and control information is to be sent.
          It is specified as a range, e.g., port=3456-3457.

          The ssrc parameter indicates the RTP SSRC [24, Sec. 3] value
          that should be (request) or will be (response) used by the
          media server. This parameter is only valid for unicast
          transmission. It identifies the synchronization source to be
          associated with the media stream.

   Transport           =    "Transport" ":"
   transport-spec      =    transport-protocol/profile[/lower-transport]
   transport-protocol  =    "RTP"
   profile             =    "AVP"
   lower-transport     =    "TCP" | "UDP"
   parameter           =    ( "unicast" | "multicast" )
                       |    ";" "destination" [ "=" address ]
                       |    ";" "interleaved" "=" channel [ "-" channel ]
                       |    ";" "append"
                       |    ";" "ttl" "=" ttl
                       |    ";" "layers" "=" 1*DIGIT
                       |    ";" "port" "=" port [ "-" port ]
                       |    ";" "client_port" "=" port [ "-" port ]
                       |    ";" "server_port" "=" port [ "-" port ]
                       |    ";" "ssrc" "=" ssrc
                       |    ";" "mode" = <"> 1\#mode <">
   ttl                 =    1*3(DIGIT)
   port                =    1*5(DIGIT)
   ssrc                =    8*8(HEX)
   channel             =    1*3(DIGIT)
   address             =    host
   mode                =    <"> *Method <"> | Method

     Transport: RTP/AVP;multicast;ttl=127;mode="PLAY",

     The Transport header is restricted to describing a single RTP
     stream. (RTSP can also control multiple streams as a single
     entity.) Making it part of RTSP rather than relying on a multitude
     of session description formats greatly simplifies designs of

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 64

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

12.40 Unsupported

     The Unsupported response header lists the features not supported by
   the server. In the case where the feature was specified via the
   Proxy-Require field (Section 12.32), if there is a proxy on the path
   between the client and the server, the proxy MUST insert a message
   reply with an error message ``551 Option Not Supported''.

   See Section 12.32 for a usage example.

12.41 User-Agent

     See [H14.42]

12.42 Vary

     See [H14.43]

12.43 Via

     See [H14.44].

12.44 WWW-Authenticate

     See [H14.46].

13 Caching

     In HTTP, response-request pairs are cached. RTSP differs
   significantly in that respect. Responses are not cacheable, with the
   exception of the presentation description returned by DESCRIBE or
   included with ANNOUNCE. (Since the responses for anything but DESCRIBE
   and GET_PARAMETER do not return any data, caching is not really an
   issue for these requests.) However, it is desirable for the continuous
   media data, typically delivered out-of-band with respect to RTSP, to
   be cached, as well as the session description.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 65

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   On receiving a SETUP or PLAY request, a proxy ascertains whether it
   has an up-to-date copy of the continuous media content and its
   description. It can determine whether the copy is up-to-date by
   issuing a SETUP or DESCRIBE request, respectively, and comparing the
   Last-Modified header with that of the cached copy. If the copy is not
   up-to-date, it modifies the SETUP transport parameters as appropriate
   and forwards the request to the origin server. Subsequent control
   commands such as PLAY or PAUSE then pass the proxy unmodified. The
   proxy delivers the continuous media data to the client, while possibly
   making a local copy for later reuse. The exact behavior allowed to the
   cache is given by the cache-response directives described in
   Section 12.8. A cache MUST answer any DESCRIBE requests if it is
   currently serving the stream to the requestor, as it is possible that
   low-level details of the stream description may have changed on the

   Note that an RTSP cache, unlike the HTTP cache, is of the
   ``cut-through'' variety. Rather than retrieving the whole resource
   from the origin server, the cache simply copies the streaming data as
   it passes by on its way to the client. Thus, it does not introduce
   additional latency.

   To the client, an RTSP proxy cache appears like a regular media
   server, to the media origin server like a client. Just as an HTTP
   cache has to store the content type, content language, and so on for
   the objects it caches, a media cache has to store the presentation
   description. Typically, a cache eliminates all transport-references
   (that is, multicast information) from the presentation description,
   since these are independent of the data delivery from the cache to the
   client. Information on the encodings remains the same. If the cache is
   able to translate the cached media data, it would create a new
   presentation description with all the encoding possibilities it can

14 Examples

     The following examples refer to stream description formats that are
   not standards, such as RTSL. The following examples are not to be used
   as a reference for those formats.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 66

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

14.1 Media on Demand (Unicast)

   Client C requests a movie from media servers A ( audio.example.com)
   and V (video.example.com). The media description is stored on a web
   server W . The media description contains descriptions of the
   presentation and all its streams, including the codecs that are
   available, dynamic RTP payload types, the protocol stack, and content
   information such as language or copyright restrictions. It may also
   give an indication about the timeline of the movie.

   In this example, the client is only interested in the last part of the

     C->W: GET /twister.sdp HTTP/1.1
           Host: www.example.com
           Accept: application/sdp

     W->C: HTTP/1.0 200 OK
           Content-Type: application/sdp

           o=- 2890844526 2890842807 IN IP4
           s=RTSP Session
           m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 0
           m=video 0 RTP/AVP 31

     C->A: SETUP rtsp://audio.example.com/twister/audio.en RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 1
           Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;client_port=3056-3057

     A->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 1
           Session: 1234
           Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;client_port=3056-3057;

     C->V: SETUP rtsp://video.example.com/twister/video RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 1
           Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;client_port=3058-3059

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 67

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     V->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 1
           Session: 1235
           Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;client_port=3058-3059;

     C->V: PLAY rtsp://video.example.com/twister/video RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 2
           Session: 1235
           Range: smpte=0:10:00-

     V->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 2
           Session: 1235
           Range: smpte=0:10:00-0:20:00
           RTP-Info: url=rtsp://video.example.com/twister/video;

     C->A: PLAY rtsp://audio.example.com/twister/audio.en RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 2
           Session: 1234
           Range: smpte=0:10:00-

     A->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 2
           Session: 1234
           Range: smpte=0:10:00-0:20:00
           RTP-Info: url=rtsp://audio.example.com/twister/audio.en;

     C->A: TEARDOWN rtsp://audio.example.com/twister/audio.en RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 3
           Session: 1234

     A->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 3

     C->V: TEARDOWN rtsp://video.example.com/twister/video RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 3
           Session: 1235

     V->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 3

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 68

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   Even though the audio and video track are on two different servers,
   and may start at slightly different times and may drift with respect
   to each other, the client can synchronize the two using standard RTP
   methods, in particular the time scale contained in the RTCP sender

14.2 Streaming of a Container file

   For purposes of this example, a container file is a storage entity in
   which multiple continuous media types pertaining to the same end-user
   presentation are present. In effect, the container file represents a
   RTSP presentation, with each of its components being RTSP streams.
   Container files are a widely used means to store such presentations.
   While the components are transported as independent streams, it is
   desirable to maintain a common context for those streams at the server

     This enables the server to keep a single storage handle open
     easily. It also allows treating all the streams equally in case of
     any prioritization of streams by the server.

   It is also possible that the presentation author may wish to prevent
   selective retrieval of the streams by the client in order to preserve
   the artistic effect of the combined media presentation. Similarly, in
   such a tightly bound presentation, it is desirable to be able to
   control all the streams via a single control message using an
   aggregate URL.

   The following is an example of using a single RTSP session to control
   multiple streams. It also illustrates the use of aggregate URLs.

   Client C requests a presentation from media server M . The movie is
   stored in a container file. The client has obtained a RTSP URL to the
   container file.

     C->M: DESCRIBE rtsp://foo/twister RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 1

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 1
           Content-Type: application/sdp
           Content-Length: 164

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 69

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

           o=- 2890844256 2890842807 IN IP4
           s=RTSP Session
           i=An Example of RTSP Session Usage
           t=0 0
           m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 0
           m=video 0 RTP/AVP 26

     C->M: SETUP rtsp://foo/twister/audio RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 2
           Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;client_port=8000-8001

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 2
           Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;client_port=8000-8001;
           Session: 1234

     C->M: SETUP rtsp://foo/twister/video RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 3
           Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;client_port=8002-8003
           Session: 1234

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 3
           Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;client_port=8002-8003;
           Session: 1234

     C->M: PLAY rtsp://foo/twister RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 4
           Range: npt=0-
           Session: 1234

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 4
           Session: 1234
           RTP-Info: url=rtsp://foo/twister/video;

     C->M: PAUSE rtsp://foo/twister/video RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 5
           Session: 1234

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 70

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 460 Only aggregate operation allowed
           CSeq: 5

     C->M: PAUSE rtsp://foo/twister RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 6
           Session: 1234

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 6
           Session: 1234

     C->M: SETUP rtsp://foo/twister RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 7
           Transport: RTP/AVP;unicast;client_port=10000

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 459 Aggregate operation not allowed
           CSeq: 7

   In the first instance of failure, the client tries to pause one stream
   (in this case video) of the presentation. This is disallowed for that
   presentation by the server. In the second instance, the aggregate URL
   may not be used for SETUP and one control message is required per
   stream to set up transport parameters.

     This keeps the syntax of the Transport header simple and allows
     easy parsing of transport information by firewalls.

14.3 Single Stream Container Files

   Some RTSP servers may treat all files as though they are ``container
   files'', yet other servers may not support such a concept. Because of
   this, clients SHOULD use the rules set forth in the session
   description for request URLs, rather than assuming that a consistant
   URL may always be used throughout. Here's an example of how a
   multi-stream server might expect a single-stream file to be served:

    C->S  DESCRIBE rtsp://foo.com/test.wav RTSP/1.0
          Accept: application/x-rtsp-mh, application/sdp
          CSeq: 1

    S->C  RTSP/1.0 200 OK
          CSeq: 1
          Content-base: rtsp://foo.com/test.wav/
          Content-type: application/sdp
          Content-length: 48

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 71

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          o=- 872653257 872653257 IN IP4
          s=mu-law wave file
          i=audio test
          t=0 0
          m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 0

    C->S  SETUP rtsp://foo.com/test.wav/streamid=0 RTSP/1.0
          Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;
          CSeq: 2

    S->C  RTSP/1.0 200 OK
          Transport: RTP/AVP/UDP;unicast;client_port=6970-6971;
          CSeq: 2
          Session: 2034820394

    C->S  PLAY rtsp://foo.com/test.wav RTSP/1.0
          CSeq: 3
          Session: 2034820394

    S->C  RTSP/1.0 200 OK
          CSeq: 3
          Session: 2034820394
          RTP-Info: url=rtsp://foo.com/test.wav/streamid=0;

   Note the different URL in the SETUP command, and then the switch back
   to the aggregate URL in the PLAY command. This makes complete sense
   when there are multiple streams with aggregate control, but is less
   than intuitive in the special case where the number of streams is one.

   In this special case, it is recommended that servers be forgiving of
   implementations that send:

    C->S  PLAY rtsp://foo.com/test.wav/streamid=0 RTSP/1.0
          CSeq: 3

   In the worst case, servers should send back:

    S->C  RTSP/1.0 460 Only aggregate operation allowed
          CSeq: 3

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 72

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   One would also hope that server implementations are also forgiving of
   the following:

    C->S  SETUP rtsp://foo.com/test.wav RTSP/1.0
          Transport: rtp/avp/udp;client_port=6970-6971;mode=play
          CSeq: 2

   Since there is only a single stream in this file, it's not ambiguous
   what this means.

14.4 Live Media Presentation Using Multicast

   The media server M chooses the multicast address and port. Here, we
   assume that the web server only contains a pointer to the full
   description, while the media server M maintains the full description.

     C->W: GET /concert.sdp HTTP/1.1
           Host: www.example.com

     W->C: HTTP/1.1 200 OK
           Content-Type: application/x-rtsl

             <track src="rtsp://live.example.com/concert/audio">

     C->M: DESCRIBE rtsp://live.example.com/concert/audio RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 1

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 1
           Content-Type: application/sdp
           Content-Length: 44

           o=- 2890844526 2890842807 IN IP4
           s=RTSP Session
           m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0
           c=IN IP4

     C->M: SETUP rtsp://live.example.com/concert/audio RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 2
           Transport: RTP/AVP;multicast

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 73

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 2
           Transport: RTP/AVP;multicast;destination=;
           Session: 0456804596

     C->M: PLAY rtsp://live.example.com/concert/audio RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 3
           Session: 0456804596

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 3
           Session: 0456804596

14.5 Playing media into an existing session

   A conference participant C wants to have the media server M play back
   a demo tape into an existing conference. C indicates to the media
   server that the network addresses and encryption keys are already
   given by the conference, so they should not be chosen by the server.
   The example omits the simple ACK responses.

     C->M: DESCRIBE rtsp://server.example.com/demo/548/sound RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 1
           Accept: application/sdp

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 1 OK
           Content-type: application/sdp
           Content-Length: 44

           o=- 2890844526 2890842807 IN IP4
           s=RTSP Session
           i=See above
           t=0 0
           m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 0

     C->M: SETUP rtsp://server.example.com/demo/548/sound RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 2
           Transport: RTP/AVP;multicast;destination=;
           Conference: 199702170042.SAA08642@obiwan.arl.wustl.edu%20Starr

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 74

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 2
           Transport: RTP/AVP;multicast;destination=;
           Session: 91389234234
           Conference: 199702170042.SAA08642@obiwan.arl.wustl.edu%20Starr

     C->M: PLAY rtsp://server.example.com/demo/548/sound RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 3
           Session: 91389234234

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 3

14.6 Recording

   The conference participant client C asks the media server M to record
   the audio and video portions of a meeting. The client uses the
   ANNOUNCE method to provide meta-information about the recorded session
   to the server.

     C->M: ANNOUNCE rtsp://server.example.com/meeting RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 90
           Content-Type: application/sdp
           Content-Length: 121

           o=camera1 3080117314 3080118787 IN IP4
           s=IETF Meeting, Munich - 1
           i=The thirty-ninth IETF meeting will be held in Munich, Germany
           e=IETF Channel 1 <ietf39-mbone@uni-koeln.de>
           p=IETF Channel 1 +49-172-2312 451
           c=IN IP4
           t=3080271600 3080703600
           a=tool:sdr v2.4a6
           m=audio 21010 RTP/AVP 5
           c=IN IP4
           m=video 61010 RTP/AVP 31
           c=IN IP4

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 90

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 75

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     C->M: SETUP rtsp://server.example.com/meeting/audiotrack RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 91
           Transport: RTP/AVP;multicast;destination=;

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 91
           Session: 508876
           Transport: RTP/AVP;multicast;destination=;

     C->M: SETUP rtsp://server.example.com/meeting/videotrack RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 92
           Session: 508876
           Transport: RTP/AVP;multicast;destination=;

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 92
           Transport: RTP/AVP;multicast;destination=;

     C->M: RECORD rtsp://server.example.com/meeting RTSP/1.0
           CSeq: 93
           Session: 508876
           Range: clock=19961110T1925-19961110T2015

     M->C: RTSP/1.0 200 OK
           CSeq: 93

15 Syntax

     The RTSP syntax is described in an augmented Backus-Naur form (BNF)
   as used in RFC 2068 [2].

15.1 Base Syntax

   OCTET              =      <any 8-bit sequence of data>
   CHAR               =      <any US-ASCII character (octets 0 - 127)>
   UPALPHA            =      <any US-ASCII uppercase letter "A".."Z">
   LOALPHA            =      <any US-ASCII lowercase letter "a".."z">
   ALPHA              =      UPALPHA | LOALPHA

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 76

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   DIGIT              =      <any US-ASCII digit "0".."9">
   CTL                =      <any US-ASCII control character
                              (octets 0 - 31) and DEL (127)>
   CR                 =      <US-ASCII CR, carriage return (13)>
   LF                 =      <US-ASCII LF, linefeed (10)>

   SP                 =      <US-ASCII SP, space (32)>
   HT                 =      <US-ASCII HT, horizontal-tab (9)>
   <">                =      <US-ASCII double-quote mark (34)>
   CRLF               =      CR LF
   LWS                =      [CRLF] 1*( SP | HT )

   TEXT               =      <any OCTET except CTLs>
   tspecials          =      "(" | ")" | "<" | ">" | "@"
                      |       "," | ";" | ":" | "\" | <">
                      |       "/" | "[" | "]" | "?" | "="
                      |       "{" | "}" | SP | HT

   token              =      1*<any CHAR except CTLs or tspecials>
   quoted-string      =      ( <"> *(qdtext) <"> )
   qdtext             =      <any TEXT except <">>
   quoted-pair        =      "\" CHAR

   message-header     =      field-name ":" [ field-value ] CRLF
   field-name         =      token
   field-value        =      *( field-content | LWS )
   field-content      =      <the OCTETs making up the field-value and
                              consisting of either *TEXT or
                              combinations of token, tspecials, and

   safe               =  "\$" | "-" | "_" | "." | "+"
   extra              =  "!" | "*" | "$'$" | "(" | ")" | ","

   hex                =  DIGIT | "A" | "B" | "C" | "D" | "E" | "F" |
                        "a" | "b" | "c" | "d" | "e" | "f"
   escape             =  "\%" hex hex
   reserved           =  ";" | "/" | "?" | ":" | "@" | "&" | "="

   unreserved         =  alpha | digit | safe | extra
   xchar              =  unreserved | reserved | escape

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 77

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

16 Security Considerations

     Because of the similarity in syntax and usage between RTSP servers
   and HTTP servers, the security considerations outlined in [H15] apply.
   Specifically, please note the following:

   Authentication Mechanisms:
          RTSP and HTTP share common authentication schemes, and thus
          should follow the same prescriptions with regards to
          authentication. See [H15.1] for client authentication issues,
          and [H15.2] for issues regarding support for multiple
          authentication mechanisms.

   Abuse of Server Log Information:
          RTSP and HTTP servers will presumably have similar logging
          mechanisms, and thus should be equally guarded in protecting
          the contents of those logs, thus protecting the privacy of the
          users of the servers. See [H15.3] for HTTP server
          recommendations regarding server logs.

   Transfer of Sensitive Information:
          There is no reason to believe that information transferred via
          RTSP may be any less sensitive than that normally transmitted
          via HTTP. Therefore, all of the precautions regarding the
          protection of data privacy and user privacy apply to
          implementors of RTSP clients, servers, and proxies. See [H15.4]
          for further details.

   Attacks Based On File and Path Names:
          Though RTSP URLs are opaque handles that do not necessarily
          have file system semantics, it is anticipated that many
          implementations will translate portions of the request URLs
          directly to file system calls. In such cases, file systems
          SHOULD follow the precautions outlined in [H15.5], such as
          checking for ``..'' in path components.

   Personal Information:
          RTSP clients are often privy to the same information that HTTP
          clients are (user name, location, etc.) and thus should be
          equally. See [H15.6] for further recommendations.

   Privacy Issues Connected to Accept Headers:
          Since may of the same ``Accept'' headers exist in RTSP as in
          HTTP, the same caveats outlined in [H15.7] with regards to
          their use should be followed.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 78

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   DNS Spoofing:
          Presumably, given the longer connection times typically
          associated to RTSP sessions relative to HTTP sessions, RTSP
          client DNS optimizations should be less prevalent. Nonetheless,
          the recommendations provided in [H15.8] are still relevant to
          any implementation which attempts to rely on a DNS-to-IP
          mapping to hold beyond a single use of the mapping.

   Location Headers and Spoofing:
          If a single server supports multiple organizations that do not
          trust one another, then it must check the values of Location
          and Content-Location headers in responses that are generated
          under control of said organizations to make sure that they do
          not attempt to invalidate resources over which they have no
          authority. ([H15.9])

   In addition to the recommendations in the current HTTP specification
   (RFC 2068 [2], as of this writing), future HTTP specifications may
   provide additional guidance on security issues.

   The following are added considerations for RTSP implementations.

   Concentrated denial-of-service attack:
          The protocol offers the opportunity for a remote-controlled
          denial-of-service attack. The attacker may initiate traffic
          flows to one or more IP addresses by specifying them as the
          destination in SETUP requests. While the attacker's IP address
          may be known in this case, this is not always useful in
          prevention of more attacks or ascertaining the attackers
          identity. Thus, an RTSP server SHOULD only allow
          client-specified destinations for RTSP-initiated traffic flows
          if the server has verified the client's identity, either
          against a database of known users using RTSP authentication
          mechanisms (preferrably digest authentication or stronger), or
          other secure means.

   Session hijacking:
          Since there is no relation between a transport layer connection
          and an RTSP session, it is possible for a malicious client to
          issue requests with random session identifiers which would
          affect unsuspecting clients. The server SHOULD use a large,
          random and non-sequential session identifier to minimize the
          possibility of this kind of attack.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 79

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          Servers SHOULD implement both basic and digest [8]
          authentication. In environments requiring tighter security for
          the control messages, transport layer mechanisms such as TLS
          (RFC XXXX [7]) SHOULD be used.

   Stream issues:
          RTSP only provides for stream control. Stream delivery issues
          are not covered in this section, nor in the rest of this draft.
          RTSP implementations will most likely rely on other protocols
          such as RTP, IP multicast, RSVP and IGMP, and should address
          security considerations brought up in those and other
          applicable specifications.

   Persistently suspicious behavior:
          RTSP servers SHOULD return error code 403 (Forbidden) upon
          receiving a single instance of behavior which is deemed a
          security risk. RTSP servers SHOULD also be aware of attempts to
          probe the server for weaknesses and entry points and MAY
          arbitrarily disconnect and ignore further requests clients
          which are deemed to be in violation of local security policy.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 80

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

Appendix A: RTSP Protocol State Machines

     The RTSP client and server state machines describe the behavior of
   the protocol from RTSP session initialization through RTSP session

   State is defined on a per object basis. An object is uniquely
   identified by the stream URL and the RTSP session identifier. Any
   request/reply using aggregate URLs denoting RTSP presentations
   composed of multiple streams will have an effect on the individual
   states of all the streams. For example, if the presentation /movie
   contains two streams, /movie/audio and /movie/video, then the
   following command:

     PLAY rtsp://foo.com/movie RTSP/1.0
     CSeq: 559
     Session: 12345

   will have an effect on the states of movie/audio and movie/video.

     This example does not imply a standard way to represent streams in
     URLs or a relation to the filesystem. See Section 3.2.

   do not have any effect on client or server state and are therefore not
   listed in the state tables.

A.1 Client State Machine

   The client can assume the following states:

          SETUP has been sent, waiting for reply.

          SETUP reply received or PAUSE reply received while in Playing

          PLAY reply received

          RECORD reply received

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 81

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   In general, the client changes state on receipt of replies to
   requests. Note that some requests are effective at a future time or
   position (such as a PAUSE), and state also changes accordingly. If no
   explicit SETUP is required for the object (for example, it is
   available via a multicast group), state begins at Ready. In this case,
   there are only two states, Ready and Playing. The client also changes
   state from Playing/Recording to Ready when the end of the requested
   range is reached.

   The ``next state'' column indicates the state assumed after receiving
   a success response (2xx). If a request yields a status code of 3xx,
   the state becomes Init, and a status code of 4xx yields no change in
   state. Messages not listed for each state MUST NOT be issued by the
   client in that state, with the exception of messages not affecting
   state, as listed above. Receiving a REDIRECT from the server is
   equivalent to receiving a 3xx redirect status from the server.

   state       message sent     next state after response
   Init        SETUP            Ready
               TEARDOWN         Init
   Ready       PLAY             Playing
               RECORD           Recording
               TEARDOWN         Init
               SETUP            Ready
   Playing     PAUSE            Ready
               TEARDOWN         Init
               PLAY             Playing
               SETUP            Playing (changed transport)
   Recording   PAUSE            Ready
               TEARDOWN         Init
               RECORD           Recording
               SETUP            Recording (changed transport)

A.2 Server State Machine

   The server can assume the following states:

          The initial state, no valid SETUP has been received yet.

          Last SETUP received was successful, reply sent or after
          playing, last PAUSE received was successful, reply sent.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 82

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

          Last PLAY received was successful, reply sent. Data is being

          The server is recording media data.

   In general, the server changes state on receiving requests. If the
   server is in state Playing or Recording and in unicast mode, it MAY
   revert to Init and tear down the RTSP session if it has not received
   ``wellness'' information, such as RTCP reports or RTSP commands, from
   the client for a defined interval, with a default of one minute. The
   server can declare another timeout value in the Session response
   header (Section 12.37). If the server is in state Ready, it MAY revert
   to Init if it does not receive an RTSP request for an interval of more
   than one minute. Note that some requests (such as PAUSE) may be
   effective at a future time or position, and server state changes at
   the appropriate time. The server reverts from state Playing or
   Recording to state Ready at the end of the range requested by the

   The REDIRECT message, when sent, is effective immediately unless it
   has a Range header specifying when the redirect is effective. In such
   a case, server state will also change at the appropriate time.

   If no explicit SETUP is required for the object, the state starts at
   Ready and there are only two states, Ready and Playing.

   The ``next state'' column indicates the state assumed after sending a
   success response (2xx). If a request results in a status code of 3xx,
   the state becomes Init. A status code of 4xx results in no change.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 83

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     state           message received  next state
     Init            SETUP             Ready
                     TEARDOWN          Init
     Ready           PLAY              Playing
                     SETUP             Ready
                     TEARDOWN          Init
                     RECORD            Recording
     Playing         PLAY              Playing
                     PAUSE             Ready
                     TEARDOWN          Init
                     SETUP             Playing
     Recording       RECORD            Recording
                     PAUSE             Ready
                     TEARDOWN          Init
                     SETUP             Recording

Appendix B: Interaction with RTP

     RTSP allows media clients to control selected, non-contiguous
   sections of media presentations, rendering those streams with an RTP
   media layer[24]. The media layer rendering the RTP stream should not
   be affected by jumps in NPT. Thus, both RTP sequence numbers and RTP
   timestamps MUST be continuous and monotonic across jumps of NPT.

   As an example, assume a clock frequency of 8000 Hz, a packetization
   interval of 100 ms and an initial sequence number and timestamp of
   zero. First we play NPT 10 through 15, then skip ahead and play NPT 18
   through 20. The first segment is presented as RTP packets with
   sequence numbers 0 through 49 and timestamp 0 through 39,200. The
   second segment consists of RTP packets with sequence number 50 through
   69, with timestamps 40,000 through 55,200.

     We cannot assume that the RTSP client can communicate with the RTP
     media agent, as the two may be independent processes. If the RTP
     timestamp shows the same gap as the NPT, the media agent will
     assume that there is a pause in the presentation. If the jump in
     NPT is large enough, the RTP timestamp may roll over and the media
     agent may believe later packets to be duplicates of packets just
     played out.

     For certain datatypes, tight integration between the RTSP layer and
     the RTP layer will be necessary. This by no means precludes the
     above restriction. Combined RTSP/RTP media clients should use the
     RTP-Info field to determine whether incoming RTP packets were sent
     before or after a seek.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 84

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   For continuous audio, the server SHOULD set the RTP marker bit at the
   beginning of serving a new PLAY request. This allows the client to
   perform playout delay adaptation.

   For scaling (see Section 12.34), RTP timestamps should correspond to
   the playback timing. For example, when playing video recorded at 30
   frames/second at a scale of two and speed (Section 12.35) of one, the
   server would drop every second frame to maintain and deliver video
   packets with the normal timestamp spacing of 3,000 per frame, but NPT
   would increase by 1/15 second for each video frame.

   The client can maintain a correct display of NPT by noting the RTP
   timestamp value of the first packet arriving after repositioning. The
   sequence parameter of the RTP-Info (Section 12.33) header provides the
   first sequence number of the next segment.

Appendix C: Use of SDP for RTSP Session Descriptions

     The Session Description Protocol (SDP, RFC XXXX [6]) may be used to
   describe streams or presentations in RTSP. Such usage is limited to
   specifying means of access and encoding(s) for:

   aggregate control:
          A presentation composed of streams from one or more servers
          that are not available for aggregate control. Such a
          description is typically retrieved by HTTP or other non-RTSP
          means. However, they may be received with ANNOUNCE methods.

   non-aggregate control:
          A presentation composed of multiple streams from a single
          server that are available for aggregate control. Such a
          description is typically returned in reply to a DESCRIBE
          request on a URL, or received in an ANNOUNCE method.

   This appendix describes how an SDP file, retrieved, for example,
   through HTTP, determines the operation of an RTSP session. It also
   describes how a client should interpret SDP content returned in reply
   to a DESCRIBE request. SDP provides no mechanism by which a client can
   distinguish, without human guidance, between several media streams to
   be rendered simultaneously and a set of alternatives (e.g., two audio
   streams spoken in different languages).

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 85

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

C.1 Definitions

   The terms ``session-level'', ``media-level'' and other key/attribute
   names and values used in this appendix are to be used as defined in
   SDP (RFC XXXX [6]):

  C.1.1 Control URL

     The ``a=control:'' attribute is used to convey the control URL. This
   attribute is used both for the session and media descriptions. If used
   for individual media, it indicates the URL to be used for controlling
   that particular media stream. If found at the session level, the
   attribute indicates the URL for aggregate control.


   This attribute may contain either relative and absolute URLs,
   following the rules and conventions set out in RFC 1808 [25].
   Implementations should look for a base URL in the following order:

   1.     The RTSP Content-Base field
   2.     The RTSP Content-Location field
   3.     The RTSP request URL

   If this attribute contains only an asterisk (*), then the URL is
   treated as if it were an empty embedded URL, and thus inherits the
   entire base URL.

  C.1.2 Media streams

   The ``m='' field is used to enumerate the streams. It is expected that
   all the specified streams will be rendered with appropriate
   synchronization. If the session is unicast, the port number serves as
   a recommendation from the server to the client; the client still has
   to include it in its SETUP request and may ignore this recommendation.
   If the server has no preference, it SHOULD set the port number value
   to zero.

     m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 31

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 86

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

  C.1.3 Payload type(s)

   The payload type(s) are specified in the ``m='' field. In case the
   payload type is a static payload type from RFC 1890 [1], no other
   information is required. In case it is a dynamic payload type, the
   media attribute ``rtpmap'' is used to specify what the media is. The
   ``encoding name'' within the ``rtpmap'' attribute may be one of those
   specified in RFC 1890 (Sections 5 and 6), or an experimental encoding
   with a ``X-'' prefix as specified in SDP (RFC XXXX [6]).
   Codec-specific parameters are not specified in this field, but rather
   in the ``fmtp'' attribute described below. Implementors seeking to
   register new encodings should follow the procedure in RFC 1890 [1]. If
   the media type is not suited to the RTP AV profile, then it is
   recommended that a new profile be created and the appropriate profile
   name be used in lieu of ``RTP/AVP'' in the ``m='' field.

  C.1.4 Format-specific parameters

   Format-specific parameters are conveyed using the ``fmtp'' media
   attribute. The syntax of the ``fmtp'' attribute is specific to the
   encoding(s) that the attribute refers to. Note that the packetization
   interval is conveyed using the ``ptime'' attribute.

  C.1.5 Range of presentation

   The ``a=range'' attribute defines the total time range of the stored
   session. (The length of live sessions can be deduced from the ``t''
   and ``r'' parameters.) Unless the presentation contains media streams
   of different durations, the length attribute is a session-level
   attribute. The unit is specified first, followed by the value range.
   The units and their values are as defined in Section 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7.


H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 87

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

  C.1.6 Time of availability

   The ``t='' field MUST contain suitable values for the start and stop
   times for both aggregate and non-aggregate stream control. With
   aggregate control, the server SHOULD indicate a stop time value for
   which it guarantees the description to be valid, and a start time that
   is equal to or before the time at which the DESCRIBE request was
   received. It MAY also indicate start and stop times of 0, meaning that
   the session is always available. With non-aggregate control, the
   values should reflect the actual period for which the session is
   available in keeping with SDP semantics, and not depend on other means
   (such as the life of the web page containing the description) for this

  C.1.7 Connection Information

   In SDP, the ``c='' field contains the destination address for the
   media stream. However, for on-demand unicast streams and some
   multicast streams, the destination address is specified by the client
   via the SETUP request. Unless the media content has a fixed
   destination address, the ``c='' field is to be set to a suitable null
   value. For addresses of type ``IP4'', this value is ``''.

  C.1.8 Entity Tag

   The optional ``a=etag'' attribute identifies a version of the session
   description. It is opaque to the client. SETUP requests may include
   this identifier in the If-Match field (see section 12.22) to only
   allow session establishment if this attribute value still corresponds
   to that of the current description. The attribute value is opaque and
   may contain any character allowed within SDP attribute values.


     One could argue that the ``o='' field provides identical
     functionality. However, it does so in a manner that would put
     constraints on servers that need to support multiple session
     description types other than SDP for the same piece of media

C.2 Aggregate Control Not Available

   If a presentation does not support aggregate control and multiple
   media sections are specified, each section MUST have the control URL
   specified via the ``a=control:'' attribute.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 88

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     o=- 2890844256 2890842807 IN IP4
     s=I came from a web page
     t=0 0
     c=IN IP4
     m=video 8002 RTP/AVP 31
     m=audio 8004 RTP/AVP 3

   Note that the position of the control URL in the description implies
   that the client establishes separate RTSP control sessions to the
   servers audio.com and video.com.

   It is recommended that an SDP file contains the complete media
   initialization information even if it is delivered to the media client
   through non-RTSP means. This is necessary as there is no mechanism to
   indicate that the client should request more detailed media stream
   information via DESCRIBE.

C.3 Aggregate Control Available

   In this scenario, the server has multiple streams that can be
   controlled as a whole. In this case, there are both a media-level
   ``a=control:'' attributes, which are used to specify the stream URLs,
   and a session-level ``a=control:'' attribute which is used as the
   request URL for aggregate control. If the media-level URL is relative,
   it is resolved to absolute URLs according to Section C.1.1 above.

   If the presentation comprises only a single stream, the media-level
   ``a=control:'' attribute may be omitted altogether. However, if the
   presentation contains more than one stream, each media stream section
   MUST contain its own ``a=control'' attribute.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 89

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

     o=- 2890844256 2890842807 IN IP4
     s=I contain
     i=<more info>
     t=0 0
     c=IN IP4
     m=video 8002 RTP/AVP 31
     m=audio 8004 RTP/AVP 3

   In this example, the client is required to establish a single RTSP
   session to the server, and uses the URLs
   rtsp://example.com/movie/trackID=1 and
   rtsp://example.com/movie/trackID=2 to set up the video and audio
   streams, respectively. The URL rtsp://example.com/movie/ controls the
   whole movie.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 90

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

Appendix D: Minimal RTSP implementation

D.1 Client

   A client implementation MUST be able to do the following :

     * Generate the following requests :
       SETUP, TEARDOWN, and one of PLAY (i.e., a minimal playback client)
       or RECORD (i.e., a minimal recording client). If RECORD is
       implemented, ANNOUNCE must be implemented as well.
     * Include the following headers in requests:
       CSeq, Connection, Session, Transport. If ANNOUNCE is implemented,
       the capability to include headers Content-Language,
       Content-Encoding, Content-Length, and Content-Type should be as
     * Parse and understand the following headers in responses: CSeq,
       Connection, Session, Transport, Content-Language,
       Content-Encoding, Content-Length, Content-Type. If RECORD is
       implemented, the Location header must be understood as well.
       RTP-compliant implementations should also implement RTP-Info.
     * Understand the class of each error code received and notify the
       end-user, if one is present, of error codes in classes 4xx and
       5xx. The notification requirement may be relaxed if the end-user
       explicitly does not want it for one or all status codes.
     * Expect and respond to asynchronous requests from the server, such
       as ANNOUNCE. This does not necessarily mean that it should
       implement the ANNOUNCE method, merely that it MUST respond
       positively or negatively to any request received from the server.

   Though not required, the following are highly recommended at the time
   of publication for practical interoperability with initial
   implementations and/or to be a ``good citizen''.

     * Implement RTP/AVP/UDP as a valid transport.
     * Inclusion of the User-Agent header.
     * Understand SDP session descriptions as defined in Appendix C
     * Accept media initialization formats (such as SDP) from standard
       input, command line, or other means appropriate to the operating
       environment to act as a ``helper application'' for other
       applications (such as web browsers).

     There may be RTSP applications different from those initially
     envisioned by the contributors to the RTSP specification for which
     the requirements above do not make sense. Therefore, the
     recommendations above serve only as guidelines instead of strict

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 91

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

  D.1.1 Basic Playback

   To support on-demand playback of media streams, the client MUST
   additionally be able to do the following:
     * generate the PAUSE request;
     * implement the REDIRECT method, and the Location header.

  D.1.2 Authentication-enabled

   In order to access media presentations from RTSP servers that require
   authentication, the client MUST additionally be able to do the
     * recognize the 401 status code;
     * parse and include the WWW-Authenticate header;
     * implement Basic Authentication and Digest Authentication.

D.2 Server

   A minimal server implementation MUST be able to do the following:

     * Implement the following methods: SETUP, TEARDOWN, OPTIONS and
       either PLAY (for a minimal playback server) or RECORD (for a
       minimal recording server).
       If RECORD is implemented, ANNOUNCE should be implemented as well.
     * Include the following headers in responses: Connection,
       Content-Length, Content-Type, Content-Language, Content-Encoding,
       Transport, Public. The capability to include the Location header
       should be implemented if the RECORD method is. RTP-compliant
       implementations should also implement the RTP-Info field.
     * Parse and respond appropriately to the following headers in
       requests: Connection, Session, Transport, Require.

   Though not required, the following are highly recommended at the time
   of publication for practical interoperability with initial
   implementations and/or to be a ``good citizen''.

     * Implement RTP/AVP/UDP as a valid transport.
     * Inclusion of the Server header.
     * Implement the DESCRIBE method.
     * Generate SDP session descriptions as defined in Appendix C

     There may be RTSP applications different from those initially
     envisioned by the contributors to the RTSP specification for which
     the requirements above do not make sense. Therefore, the
     recommendations above serve only as guidelines instead of strict

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 92

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

  D.2.1 Basic Playback

   To support on-demand playback of media streams, the server MUST
   additionally be able to do the following:

     * Recognize the Range header, and return an error if seeking is not
     * Implement the PAUSE method.

   In addition, in order to support commonly-accepted user interface
   features, the following are highly recommended for on-demand media

     * Include and parse the Range header, with NPT units. Implementation
       of SMPTE units is recommended.
     * Include the length of the media presentation in the media
       initialization information.
     * Include mappings from data-specific timestamps to NPT. When RTP is
       used, the rtptime portion of the RTP-Info field may be used to map
       RTP timestamps to NPT.

     Client implementations may use the presence of length information
     to determine if the clip is seekable, and visably disable seeking
     features for clips for which the length information is unavailable.
     A common use of the presentation length is to implement a ``slider
     bar'' which serves as both a progress indicator and a timeline
     positioning tool.

     Mappings from RTP timestamps to NPT are necessary to ensure correct
     positioning of the slider bar.

  D.2.2 Authentication-enabled

   In order to correctly handle client authentication, the server MUST
   additionally be able to do the following:

     * Generate the 401 status code when authentication is required for
       the resource.
     * Parse and include the WWW-Authenticate header
     * Implement Basic Authentication and Digest Authentication

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 93

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

Appendix E: Author Addresses

   Henning Schulzrinne
   Dept. of Computer Science
   Columbia University
   1214 Amsterdam Avenue
   New York, NY 10027
   electronic mail: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu

   Anup Rao
   Netscape Communications Corp.
   501 E. Middlefield Road
   Mountain View, CA 94043
   electronic mail: anup@netscape.com

   Robert Lanphier
   1111 Third Avenue Suite 2900
   Seattle, WA 98101
   electronic mail: robla@prognet.com

Appendix F: Acknowledgements

   This draft is based on the functionality of the original RTSP draft
   submitted in October 96. It also borrows format and descriptions from

   This document has benefited greatly from the comments of all those
   participating in the MMUSIC-WG. In addition to those already
   mentioned, the following individuals have contributed to this

   Rahul Agarwal, Torsten Braun, Brent Browning, Bruce Butterfield, Ema
   Patki, Steve Casner, Francisco Cortes, Kelly Djahandari, Martin
   Dunsmuir, Eric Fleischman, Jay Geagan, Andy Grignon, V. Guruprasad,
   Peter Haight, Mark Handley, Brad Hefta-Gaub, John K. Ho, Philipp
   Hoschka, Anne Jones, Anders Klemets, Ruth Lang, Stephanie Leif,
   Jonathan Lennox, Eduardo F. Llach, Rob McCool, David Oran, Maria
   Papadopouli, Sujal Patel, Alagu Periyannan, Igor Plotnikov, Pinaki
   Shah, David Singer, Jeff Smith, Alexander Sokolsky, Dale Stammen, and
   John Francis Stracke.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 94

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998


   1      H. Schulzrinne, ``RTP profile for audio and video conferences
          with minimal control,'' RFC 1890, Internet Engineering Task
          Force, Jan. 1996.

   2      R. Fielding, J. Gettys, J. Mogul, H. Nielsen, and T.
          Berners-Lee, ``Hypertext transfer protocol - HTTP/1.1,'' RFC
          2068, Internet Engineering Task Force, Jan. 1997.

   3      F. Yergeau, G. Nicol, G. Adams, and M. Duerst,
          ``Internationalization of the hypertext markup language,'' RFC
          2070, Internet Engineering Task Force, Jan. 1997.

   4      S. Bradner, ``Key words for use in RFCs to indicate requirement
          levels,'' RFC 2119, Internet Engineering Task Force, Mar. 1997.

   5      ISO/IEC, ``Information technology - generic coding of moving
          pictures and associated audio informaiton - part 6: extension
          for digital storage media and control,'' Draft International
          Standard ISO 13818-6, International Organization for
          Standardization ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, Geneva, Switzerland,
          Nov. 1995.

   6      M. Handley and V. Jacobson, ``SDP: Session description
          protocol,'' Request for Comments XXXX, Internet Engineering
          Task Force, Feb. 1998.

   7      A. Freier, P. Karlton, and P. Kocher, ``The TLS protocol,''
          Request for Comments XXXX, Internet Engineering Task Force,
          Feb. 1998.

   8      J. Franks, P. Hallam-Baker, and J. Hostetler, ``An extension to
          HTTP: digest access authentication,'' RFC 2069, Internet
          Engineering Task Force, Jan. 1997.

   9      J. Postel, ``User datagram protocol,'' RFC STD 6, 768, Internet
          Engineering Task Force, Aug. 1980.

   10     B. Hinden and C. Partridge, ``Version 2 of the reliable data
          protocol (RDP),'' RFC 1151, Internet Engineering Task Force,
          Apr. 1990.

   11     J. Postel, ``Transmission control protocol,'' RFC STD 7, 793,
          Internet Engineering Task Force, Sept. 1981.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 95

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   12     H. Schulzrinne, ``A comprehensive multimedia control
          architecture for the Internet,'' in Proc. International
          Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital
          Audio and Video (NOSSDAV), (St. Louis, Missouri), May 1997.

   13     International Telecommunication Union, ``Visual telephone
          systems and equipment for local area networks which provide a
          non-guaranteed quality of service,'' Recommendation H.323,
          Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, Geneva,
          Switzerland, May 1996.

   14     P. McMahon, ``GSS-API authentication method for SOCKS version
          5,'' RFC 1961, Internet Engineering Task Force, June 1996.

   15     J. Miller, P. Resnick, and D. Singer, ``Rating services and
          rating systems (and their machine readable descriptions),''
          Recommendation REC-PICS-services-961031, W3C (World Wide Web
          Consortium), Boston, Massachusetts, Oct. 1996.

   16     J. Miller, T. Krauskopf, P. Resnick, and W. Treese, ``PICS
          label distribution label syntax and communication protocols,''
          Recommendation REC-PICS-labels-961031, W3C (World Wide Web
          Consortium), Boston, Massachusetts, Oct. 1996.

   17     D. Crocker and P. Overell, ``Augmented BNF for syntax
          specifications: ABNF,'' RFC 2234, Internet Engineering Task
          Force, Nov. 1997.

   18     B. Braden, ``Requirements for internet hosts - application and
          support,'' RFC STD 3, 1123, Internet Engineering Task Force,
          Oct. 1989.

   19     R. Elz, ``A compact representation of IPv6 addresses,'' RFC
          1924, Internet Engineering Task Force, Apr. 1996.

   20     T. Berners-Lee, L. Masinter, and M. McCahill, ``Uniform
          resource locators (URL),'' RFC 1738, Internet Engineering Task
          Force, Dec. 1994.

   21     F. Yergeau, ``Utf-8, a transformation format of iso 10646,''
          Request for Comments XXXX, Internet Engineering Task Force,
          Jan. 1998.

   22     B. Braden, ``T/TCP - TCP extensions for transactions functional
          specification,'' RFC 1644, Internet Engineering Task Force,
          July 1994.

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 96

INTERNET-DRAFT                   RTSP                 January 15, 1998

   23     W. R. Stevens, TCP/IP illustrated: the implementation, vol. 2.
          Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1994.

   24     H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, and V. Jacobson,
          ``RTP: a transport protocol for real-time applications,'' RFC
          1889, Internet Engineering Task Force, Jan. 1996.

   25     R. Fielding, ``Relative uniform resource locators,'' RFC 1808,
          Internet Engineering Task Force, June 1995.

Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1997). All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implmentation may be prepared, copied, published and
   distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind,
   provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing
   Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined
   in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to
   translate it into languages other than English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an

H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, R. Lanphier                            Page 97