MOPS                                                          R. Krishna
Internet-Draft                               InterDigital Europe Limited
Intended status: Informational                                 A. Rahman
Expires: 7 September 2022               InterDigital Communications, LLC
                                                            6 March 2022


 Media Operations Use Case for an Augmented Reality Application on Edge
                        Computing Infrastructure
                     draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-04

Abstract

   This document explores the issues involved in the use of Edge
   Computing resources to operationalize media use cases that involve
   Extended Reality (XR) applications.  In particular, we discuss those
   applications that run on devices having different form factors and
   need Edge computing resources to mitigate the effect of problems such
   as a need to support interactive communication requiring low latency,
   limited battery power, and heat dissipation from those devices.  The
   intended audience for this document are network operators who are
   interested in providing edge computing resources to operationalize
   the requirements of such applications.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 7 September 2022.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.






Krishna & Rahman        Expires 7 September 2022                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft              MOPS AR Use Case                  March 2022


   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Use Case  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.1.  Processing of Scenes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.2.  Generation of Images  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.  Requirements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   5.  AR Network Traffic and Interaction with TCP . . . . . . . . .   8
   6.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12

1.  Introduction

   Extended Reality (XR) is a term that includes Augmented Realty (AR),
   Virtual Reality (VR) and Mixed Realty (MR) [XR].  AR combines the
   real and virtual, is interactive and is aligned to the physical world
   of the user [AUGMENTED_2].  On the other hand, VR places the user
   inside a virtual environment generated by a computer [AUGMENTED].MR
   merges the real and virtual world along a continuum that connects
   completely real environment at one end to a completely virtual
   environment at the other end.  In this continuum, all combinations of
   the real and virtual are captured [AUGMENTED].

   XR applications will bring several requirements for the network and
   the mobile devices running these applications.  Some XR applications
   such as AR require a real-time processing of video streams to
   recognize specific objects.  This is then used to overlay information
   on the video being displayed to the user.  In addition XR
   applications such as AR and VR will also require generation of new
   video frames to be played to the user.  Both the real-time processing
   of video streams and the generation of overlay information are
   computationally intensive tasks that generate heat [DEV_HEAT_1],
   [DEV_HEAT_2] and drain battery power [BATT_DRAIN] on the mobile
   device running the XR application.  Consequently, in order to run
   applications with XR characteristics on mobile devices,
   computationally intensive tasks need to be offloaded to resources
   provided by Edge Computing.




Krishna & Rahman        Expires 7 September 2022                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft              MOPS AR Use Case                  March 2022


   Edge Computing is an emerging paradigm where computing resources and
   storage are made available in close network proximity at the edge of
   the Internet to mobile devices and sensors [EDGE_1], [EDGE_2].  These
   edge computing devices use cloud technologies that enable them to
   support offloaded XR applications.  In particular, the edge devices
   deploy cloud computing implementation techniques such as
   disaggregation (breaking vertically integrated systems into
   independent components with open interfaces using SDN),
   virtualization (being able to run multiple independent copies of
   those components such as SDN Controller apps, Virtual Network
   Functions on a common hardware platform) and commoditization ( being
   able to elastically scale those virtual components across commodity
   hardware as the workload dictates) [EDGE_3].  Such techniques enable
   XR applications requiring low-latency and high bandwidth to be
   delivered by mini-clouds running on proximate edge devices

   In this document, we discuss the issues involved when edge computing
   resources are offered by network operators to operationalize the
   requirements of XR applications running on devices with various form
   factors.  Examples of such form factors include Head Mounted Displays
   (HMD) such as Optical-see through HMDs and video-see-through HMDs and
   Hand-held displays.  Smart phones with video cameras and GPS are
   another example of such devices.  These devices have limited battery
   capacity and dissipate heat when running.  Besides as the user of
   these devices moves around as they run the XR application, the
   wireless latency and bandwidth available to the devices fluctuates
   and the communication link itself might fail.  As a result algorithms
   such as those based on adaptive-bit-rate techniques that base their
   policy on heuristics or models of deployment perform sub-optimally in
   such dynamic environments.[ABR_1].  We motivate these issues with a
   use-case that we present in the following sections.

2.  Conventions used in this document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3.  Use Case

   We now describe a use case that involves an application with AR
   systems' characteristics.  Consider a group of tourists who are being
   conducted in a tour around the historical site of the Tower of
   London.  As they move around the site and within the historical
   buildings, they can watch and listen to historical scenes in 3D that
   are generated by the AR application and then overlaid by their AR
   headsets onto their real-world view.  The headset then continuously
   updates their view as they move around.



Krishna & Rahman        Expires 7 September 2022                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft              MOPS AR Use Case                  March 2022


   The AR application first processes the scene that the walking tourist
   is watching in real-time and identifies objects that will be targeted
   for overlay of high resolution videos.  It then generates high
   resolution 3D images of historical scenes related to the perspective
   of the tourist in real-time.  These generated video images are then
   overlaid on the view of the real-world as seen by the tourist.

   We now discuss this processing of scenes and generation of high
   resolution images in greater detail.

3.1.  Processing of Scenes

   The task of processing a scene can be broken down into a pipeline of
   three consecutive subtasks namely tracking, followed by an
   acquisition of a model of the real world, and finally registration
   [AUGMENTED].

   Tracking: This includes tracking of the three dimensional coordinates
   and six dimensional pose (coordinates and orientation) of objects in
   the real world[AUGMENTED].  The AR application that runs on the
   mobile device needs to track the pose of the user's head, eyes and
   the objects that are in view.This requires tracking natural features
   that are then used in the next stage of the pipeline.

   Acquisition of a model of the real world: The tracked natural
   features are used to develop an annotated point cloud based model
   that is then stored in a database.To ensure that this database can be
   scaled up,techniques such as combining a client side simultaneous
   tracking and mapping and a server-side localization are used[SLAM_1],
   [SLAM_2], [SLAM_3], [SLAM_4].

   Registration: The coordinate systems, brightness, and color of
   virtual and real objects need to be aligned in a process called
   registration [REG].  Once the natural features are tracked as
   discussed above, virtual objects are geometrically aligned with those
   features by geometric registration .This is followed by resolving
   occlusion that can occur between virtual and the real objects
   [OCCL_1], [OCCL_2].  The AR application also applies photometric
   registration [PHOTO_REG] by aligning the brightness and color between
   the virtual and real objects.Additionally, algorithms that calculate
   global illumination of both the virtual and real objects
   [GLB_ILLUM_1], [GLB_ILLUM_2] are executed.Various algorithms to deal
   with artifacts generated by lens distortion [LENS_DIST], blur [BLUR],
   noise [NOISE] etc are also required.







Krishna & Rahman        Expires 7 September 2022                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft              MOPS AR Use Case                  March 2022


3.2.  Generation of Images

   The AR application must generate a high-quality video that has the
   properties described in the previous step and overlay the video on
   the AR device's display- a step called situated visualization.  This
   entails dealing with registration errors that may arise, ensuring
   that there is no visual interference [VIS_INTERFERE], and finally
   maintaining temporal coherence by adapting to the movement of user's
   eyes and head.

4.  Requirements

   The components of AR applications perform tasks such as real-time
   generation and processing of high-quality video content that are
   computationally intensive.  As a result,on AR devices such as AR
   glasses excessive heat is generated by the chip-sets that are
   involved in the computation [DEV_HEAT_1], [DEV_HEAT_2].
   Additionally, the battery on such devices discharges quickly when
   running such applications [BATT_DRAIN].

   A solution to the heat dissipation and battery drainage problem is to
   offload the processing and video generation tasks to the remote
   cloud.However, running such tasks on the cloud is not feasible as the
   end-to-end delays must be within the order of a few milliseconds.
   Additionally,such applications require high bandwidth and low jitter
   to provide a high QoE to the user.In order to achieve such hard
   timing constraints, computationally intensive tasks can be offloaded
   to Edge devices.























Krishna & Rahman        Expires 7 September 2022                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft              MOPS AR Use Case                  March 2022


   Another requirement for our use case and similar applications such as
   360 degree streaming is that the display on the AR/VR device should
   synchronize the visual input with the way the user is moving their
   head.  This synchronization is necessary to avoid motion sickness
   that results from a time-lag between when the user moves their head
   and when the appropriate video scene is rendered.  This time lag is
   often called "motion-to-photon" delay.  Studies have shown
   [PER_SENSE], [XR], [OCCL_3] that this delay can be at most 20ms and
   preferably between 7-15ms in order to avoid the motion sickness
   problem.  Out of these 20ms, display techniques including the refresh
   rate of write displays and pixel switching take 12-13ms [OCCL_3],
   [CLOUD].  This leaves 7-8ms for the processing of motion sensor
   inputs, graphic rendering, and RTT between the AR/VR device and the
   Edge.  The use of predictive techniques to mask latencies has been
   considered as a mitigating strategy to reduce motion sickness
   [PREDICT].  In addition, Edge Devices that are proximate to the user
   might be used to offload these computationally intensive tasks.
   Towards this end, the 3GPP requires and supports an Ultra Reliable
   Low Latency of 0.1ms to 1ms for communication between an Edge server
   and User Equipment(UE) [URLLC].

   Note that the Edge device providing the computation and storage is
   itself limited in such resources compared to the Cloud.  So, for
   example, a sudden surge in demand from a large group of tourists can
   overwhelm that device.  This will result in a degraded user
   experience as their AR device experiences delays in receiving the
   video frames.  In order to deal with this problem, the client AR
   applications will need to use Adaptive Bit Rate (ABR) algorithms that
   choose bit-rates policies tailored in a fine-grained manner to the
   resource demands and playback the videos with appropriate QoE metrics
   as the user moves around with the group of tourists.




















Krishna & Rahman        Expires 7 September 2022                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft              MOPS AR Use Case                  March 2022


   However, heavy-tailed nature of several operational parameters make
   prediction-based adaptation by ABR algorithms sub-optimal[ABR_2].
   This is because with such distributions, law of large numbers works
   too slowly, the mean of sample does not equal the mean of
   distribution, and as a result standard deviation and variance are
   unsuitable as metrics for such operational parameters [HEAVY_TAIL_1],
   [HEAVY_TAIL_2].  Other subtle issues with these distributions include
   the "expectation paradox" [HEAVY_TAIL_1] where the longer we have
   waited for an event the longer we have to wait and the issue of
   mismatch between the size and count of events [HEAVY_TAIL_1].  This
   makes designing an algorithm for adaptation error-prone and
   challenging.  Such operational parameters include but are not limited
   to buffer occupancy, throughput, client-server latency, and variable
   transmission times.In addition, edge devices and communication links
   may fail and logical communication relationships between various
   software components change frequently as the user moves around with
   their AR device [UBICOMP].

   Thus, once the offloaded computationally intensive processing is
   completed on the Edge Computing, the video is streamed to the user
   with the help of an ABR algorithm which needs to meet the following
   requirements [ABR_1]:

   *  Dynamically changing ABR parameters: The ABR algorithm must be
      able to dynamically change parameters given the heavy-tailed
      nature of network throughput.  This, for example, may be
      accomplished by AI/ML processing on the Edge Computing on a per
      client or global basis.

   *  Handling conflicting QoE requirements: QoE goals often require
      high bit-rates, and low frequency of buffer refills.  However in
      practice, this can lead to a conflict between those goals.  For
      example, increasing the bit-rate might result in the need to fill
      up the buffer more frequently as the buffer capacity might be
      limited on the AR device.  The ABR algorithm must be able to
      handle this situation.

   *  Handling side effects of deciding a specific bit rate: For
      example, selecting a bit rate of a particular value might result
      in the ABR algorithm not changing to a different rate so as to
      ensure a non-fluctuating bit-rate and the resultant smoothness of
      video quality . The ABR algorithm must be able to handle this
      situation.








Krishna & Rahman        Expires 7 September 2022                [Page 7]


Internet-Draft              MOPS AR Use Case                  March 2022


5.  AR Network Traffic and Interaction with TCP

   In addition to the requirements for ABR algorithms, there are other
   operational issues that need to be considered for AR use cases such
   as the one descibed above.  In a study [AR_TRAFFIC] conducted to
   characterize multi-user AR over cellular networks, the following
   issues were identified:

   *  The uploading of data from an AR device to a remote server for
      processing dominates the end-to-end latency.

   *  A lack of visual features in the grid environment can cause
      increased latencies as the AR device uploads additional visual
      data for processing to the remote server.

   *  AR applications tend to have large bursts that are separated by
      significant time gaps.  As a result, the TCP congestion window
      enters slow start before the large bursts of data arrive
      increasing the perceived user latency.  The study [AR_TRAFFIC]
      shows that segmentation latency at 4G LTE (Long Term Evolution)'s
      RAN (Radio Access Network)'s RLC (Radio Link Control) layer
      impacts TCP's performance during slow-start.

6.  Informative References

   [ABR_1]    Mao, H., Netravali, R., and M. Alizadeh, "Neural Adaptive
              Video Streaming with Pensieve", In Proceedings of the
              Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data
              Communication, pp. 197-210, 2017.

   [ABR_2]    Yan, F., Ayers, H., Zhu, C., Fouladi, S., Hong, J., Zhang,
              K., Levis, P., and K. Winstein, "Learning in situ: a
              randomized experiment in video streaming", In 17th USENIX
              Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation
              (NSDI 20), pp. 495-511, 2020.

   [AR_TRAFFIC]
              Apicharttrisorn, K., Balasubramanian, B., Chen, J.,
              Sivaraj, R., Tsai, Y., Jana, R., Krishnamurthy, S., Tran,
              T., and Y. Zhou, "Characterization of Multi-User Augmented
              Reality over Cellular Networks", In 17th Annual IEEE
              International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and
              Networking (SECON), pp. 1-9. IEEE, 2020.

   [AUGMENTED]
              Schmalstieg, D. S. and T.H. Hollerer, "Augmented
              Reality",  Addison Wesley, 2016.




Krishna & Rahman        Expires 7 September 2022                [Page 8]


Internet-Draft              MOPS AR Use Case                  March 2022


   [AUGMENTED_2]
              Azuma, R. T., "A Survey of Augmented
              Reality.",  Presence:Teleoperators and Virtual
              Environments 6.4, pp. 355-385., 1997.

   [BATT_DRAIN]
              Seneviratne, S., Hu, Y., Nguyen, T., Lan, G., Khalifa, S.,
              Thilakarathna, K., Hassan, M., and A. Seneviratne, "A
              survey of wearable devices and challenges.", In IEEE
              Communication Surveys and Tutorials, 19(4), p.2573-2620.,
              2017.

   [BLUR]     Kan, P. and H. Kaufmann, "Physically-Based Depth of Field
              in Augmented Reality.", In Eurographics (Short Papers),
              pp. 89-92., 2012.

   [CLOUD]    Corneo, L., Eder, M., Mohan, N., Zavodovski, A., Bayhan,
              S., Wong, W., Gunningberg, P., Kangasharju, J., and J.
              Ott, "Surrounded by the Clouds: A Comprehensive Cloud
              Reachability Study.", In Proceedings of the Web Conference
              2021, pp. 295-304, 2021.

   [DEV_HEAT_1]
              LiKamWa, R., Wang, Z., Carroll, A., Lin, F., and L. Zhong,
              "Draining our Glass: An Energy and Heat characterization
              of Google Glass", In Proceedings of 5th Asia-Pacific
              Workshop on Systems pp. 1-7, 2013.

   [DEV_HEAT_2]
              Matsuhashi, K., Kanamoto, T., and A. Kurokawa, "Thermal
              model and countermeasures for future smart glasses.",
              In Sensors, 20(5), p.1446., 2020.

   [EDGE_1]   Satyanarayanan, M., "The Emergence of Edge Computing",
              In Computer 50(1) pp. 30-39, 2017.

   [EDGE_2]   Satyanarayanan, M., Klas, G., Silva, M., and S. Mangiante,
              "The Seminal Role of Edge-Native Applications", In IEEE
              International Conference on Edge Computing (EDGE) pp.
              33-40, 2019.

   [EDGE_3]   Peterson, L. and O. Sunay, "5G mobile networks: A systems
              approach.", In Synthesis Lectures on Network Systems.,
              2020.







Krishna & Rahman        Expires 7 September 2022                [Page 9]


Internet-Draft              MOPS AR Use Case                  March 2022


   [GLB_ILLUM_1]
              Kan, P. and H. Kaufmann, "Differential irradiance caching
              for fast high-quality light transport between virtual and
              real worlds.", In IEEE International Symposium on Mixed
              and Augmented Reality (ISMAR),pp. 133-141, 2013.

   [GLB_ILLUM_2]
              Franke, T., "Delta voxel cone tracing.", In IEEE
              International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality
              (ISMAR), pp. 39-44, 2014.

   [HEAVY_TAIL_1]
              Crovella, M. and B. Krishnamurthy, "Internet measurement:
              infrastructure, traffic and applications", John Wiley and
              Sons Inc., 2006.

   [HEAVY_TAIL_2]
              Taleb, N., "The Statistical Consequences of Fat Tails",
              STEM Academic Press, 2020.

   [I-D.ietf-mops-streaming-opcons]
              Holland, J., Begen, A., and S. Dawkins, "Operational
              Considerations for Streaming Media", Work in Progress,
              Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons-09, 1
              March 2022, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-
              ietf-mops-streaming-opcons-09>.

   [LENS_DIST]
              Fuhrmann, A. and D. Schmalstieg, "Practical calibration
              procedures for augmented reality.", In Virtual
              Environments 2000, pp. 3-12. Springer, Vienna, 2000.

   [NOISE]    Fischer, J., Bartz, D., and W. Stra├čer, "Enhanced visual
              realism by incorporating camera image effects.",
              In IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented
              Reality, pp. 205-208., 2006.

   [OCCL_1]   Breen, D.E., Whitaker, R.T., and M. Tuceryan, "Interactive
              Occlusion and automatic object placementfor augmented
              reality", In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 15, no. 3 , pp.
              229-238,Edinburgh, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1996.

   [OCCL_2]   Zheng, F., Schmalstieg, D., and G. Welch, "Pixel-wise
              closed-loop registration in video-based augmented
              reality", In IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and
              Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp. 135-143, 2014.





Krishna & Rahman        Expires 7 September 2022               [Page 10]


Internet-Draft              MOPS AR Use Case                  March 2022


   [OCCL_3]   Lang, B., "Oculus Shares 5 Key Ingredients for Presence in
              Virtual Reality.",  https://www.roadtovr.com/oculus-
              shares-5-key-ingredients-for-presence-in-virtual-reality/,
              2014.

   [PER_SENSE]
              Mania, K., Adelstein, B.D., Ellis, S.R., and M.I. Hill,
              "Perceptual sensitivity to head tracking latency in
              virtual environments with varying degrees of scene
              complexity.", In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on
              Applied perception in graphics and visualization pp.
              39-47., 2004.

   [PHOTO_REG]
              Liu, Y. and X. Granier, "Online tracking of outdoor
              lighting variations for augmented reality with moving
              cameras", In IEEE Transactions on visualization and
              computer graphics, 18(4), pp.573-580, 2012.

   [PREDICT]  Buker, T. J., Vincenzi, D.A., and J.E. Deaton, "The effect
              of apparent latency on simulator sickness while using a
              see-through helmet-mounted display: Reducing apparent
              latency with predictive compensation..", In Human factors
              54.2, pp. 235-249., 2012.

   [REG]      Holloway, R. L., "Registration error analysis for
              augmented reality.", In Presence:Teleoperators and Virtual
              Environments 6.4, pp. 413-432., 1997.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [SLAM_1]   Ventura, J., Arth, C., Reitmayr, G., and D. Schmalstieg,
              "A minimal solution to the generalized pose-and-scale
              problem", In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on
              Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 422-429,
              2014.

   [SLAM_2]   Sweeny, C., Fragoso, V., Hollerer, T., and M. Turk, "A
              scalable solution to the generalized pose and scale
              problem", In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp.
              16-31, 2014.







Krishna & Rahman        Expires 7 September 2022               [Page 11]


Internet-Draft              MOPS AR Use Case                  March 2022


   [SLAM_3]   Gauglitz, S., Sweeny, C., Ventura, J., Turk, M., and T.
              Hollerer, "Model estimation and selection towards
              unconstrained real-time tracking and mapping", In IEEE
              transactions on visualization and computer graphics,
              20(6), pp. 825-838, 2013.

   [SLAM_4]   Pirchheim, C., Schmalstieg, D., and G. Reitmayr, "Handling
              pure camera rotation in keyframe-based SLAM", In 2013 IEEE
              international symposium on mixed and augmented reality
              (ISMAR), pp. 229-238, 2013.

   [UBICOMP]  Bardram, J. and A. Friday, "Ubiquitous Computing Systems",
              In Ubiquitous Computing Fundamentals pp. 37-94. CRC Press,
              2009.

   [URLLC]    3GPP, "3GPP TR 23.725: Study on enhancement of Ultra-
              Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC) support in the
              5G Core network (5GC).",
              https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/
              SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3453, 2019.

   [VIS_INTERFERE]
              Kalkofen, D., Mendez, E., and D. Schmalstieg, "Interactive
              focus and context visualization for augmented reality.",
              In 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and
              Augmented Reality, pp. 191-201., 2007.

   [XR]       3GPP, "3GPP TR 26.928: Extended Reality (XR) in 5G.",
              https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/
              SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3534, 2020.

Authors' Addresses

   Renan Krishna
   InterDigital Europe Limited
   64, Great Eastern Street
   London
   EC2A 3QR
   United Kingdom
   Email: renan.krishna@interdigital.com


   Akbar Rahman
   InterDigital Communications, LLC
   1000 Sherbrooke Street West
   Montreal  H3A 3G4
   Canada
   Email: Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com



Krishna & Rahman        Expires 7 September 2022               [Page 12]