PANA Working Group
   Internet Draft                                      M. Parthasarathy
   Document: draft-ietf-pana-ipsec-02.txt                         Nokia
   Expires: August 2004                                   February 2004



                 PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control



Status of this Memo

   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026 [i].

   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026 except that the right to
   produce derivative works is not granted.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
        http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
        http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.


Abstract

   The PANA (Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access)
   working group is developing protocol for authenticating clients to
   the access network using IP based protocols.  The PANA protocol
   authenticates the client and also establishes a PANA security
   association between the PANA client and PANA authentication agent at
   the end of a successful authentication. This document discusses the
   details for establishing an IPsec security association using the PANA
   security association for enabling IPsec based access control.


<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                 [Page 1]


               PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control  February 2004


Table of Contents

   1.0 Introduction..................................................2
   2.0 Keywords......................................................3
   3.0 Pre-requisites for IPsec SA establisment......................3
   4.0 IP Address Configuration......................................3
   5.0 IKE Pre-shared key derivation.................................4
   6.0 IKE and IPsec details.........................................5
   7.0 Packet Formats................................................6
   8.0 IPsec SPD entries.............................................7
   9.0 Double IPsec..................................................9
   10.0 Security considerations.....................................10
   11.0 Normative References........................................10
   12.0 Informative References......................................11
   13.0 Acknowledgments.............................................12
   14.0 Revision log................................................12
   15.0 Author's Addresses..........................................12
   16.0 Full Copyright Statement....................................12


1.0 Introduction

   The PANA (Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access)
   working group is developing protocol for authenticating clients to
   the access network using IP based protocols.  The PANA protocol
   authenticates the client and also establishes a PANA security
   association between the PANA client and PANA authentication agent at
   the end of successful authentication. The PANA authentication agent
   (PAA) indicates the results of the authentication using the PANA-
   Bind-Request message wherein it can indicate the access control
   method enforced by the access network. The PANA protocol [PANA-PROT]
   does not discuss any details of IPsec [IPSEC] SA establishment, when
   IPsec is used for access control. This document discusses the details
   of establishing an IPsec security association between PANA client and
   the enforcement point. When the IPsec SA is successfully established,
   it can be used for access control and specifically used to prevent
   the service theft mentioned in [PANA-THREATS].

   Please refer to [PANAREQ] for terminology and definitions of terms
   used in this document. The following picture illustrates what is
   being protected with IPsec. As shown in Figure 1, Enforcement Point
   (EP) and the Access Router (AR) are co-located. PAA is not shown in
   the figure. It may or may not be co-located with EP. The IPsec
   security association protects the traffic between PaC and EP. In
   IPsec terms, EP is a security gateway (therefore a router) and
   forwards packets coming from the PaC to other nodes.




<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                 [Page 2]


               PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control  February 2004







                      PaC ----------------------+
                      [D1]                      |
                                                +------EP/AR
                                                |
                      PaC ----------------------+
                      [D2]
                      |------IPsec------|

                          Figure 1

   First, this document discusses some of the pre-requisites for IPsec
   SA establishment. Next, it gives details on what should be
   communicated between PAA and EP. Then, it gives the details of
   IKE/IPsec exchange with packet formats and SPD entries. Finally, it
   discusses the issues when IPsec is used for remote access together
   with local access.

2.0 Keywords

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [KEYWORDS].


3.0 Pre-requisites for IPsec SA establisment

   This document assumes that the following have already happened before
   the IKE exchange starts.

     1) PANA client (PaC) and PAA mutually authenticate each other using
        EAP methods that derive AAA-key [EAP-KEY].

     2) PaC learns the IP address of the Enforcement point (EP) during
        the PANA exchange.

     3) PaC learns that the network uses IPsec [IPSEC] for securing the
        link between PaC and EP during the PANA exchange.

     4) PaC configures a routable or global address as discussed in
        section 4 of this document.

4.0 IP Address Configuration



<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                 [Page 3]


               PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control  February 2004

   PaC configures a link-local address [IPV4-LINK] [IPV6-CONF] before
   the PANA protocol begins. If IPv4 is being used, it may even
   configure a private address [IPV4-PRIV] using a DHCP server provided
   by the Network Access provider. See [PANA-FRAME] for more details.
   After a successful authentication, the client configures a routable
   or global address using [DHCP][DHCPV6] before running [IKE][IKEv2] or
   running address auto-configuration methods available within [IKE] or
   [IKEv2] by using a configuration payload or running DHCP over a
   special IPsec tunnel mode SA [RFC3456] or auto-configures an address
   using stateless auto-configuration [IPv6-ND] before running [IKE] or
   [IKEv2] if IPv6 is being used.

   In the case of IPV4, the link-local address or private address SHOULD
   be un-configured when the global address is configured, to prevent
   using the link-local address or private address as the source address
   for communicating with the external nodes [IPV4-LINK]. Some
   implementations may be able to choose the right address, where the
   IPsec tunnel mode SAs are modeled as interfaces. But this document
   does not make any such assumptions. In IPv4, all packets are tunneled
   using IPsec tunnel mode SA with the inner and outer source address
   same as the routable address. In the case of IPv6, such restrictions
   don't exist. The link-local address is used for the outer header and
   global address is used for the inner header for the tunnel.

5.0 IKE Pre-shared key derivation

   If the network chooses IPsec to secure the link between PaC and EP,
   PAA should communicate the IKE pre-shared key, the link-local address
   of the PaC (in IPv6 only), routable address of the PaC and the PANA
   session ID to EP before the IKE exchange begins.

   The IKE exchange between PaC and PAA is equivalent to the 4-way
   handshake in [IEEE80211i] following the EAP exchange. The IKE
   exchange establishes the IPsec SA similar to the pair-wise transient
   keys (PTK) established in [IEEE80211i]. The IKE exchange provides
   both key confirmation and protected cipher-suite negotiation.

   IKE pre-shared key is derived as follows.

   IKE Pre-shared Key = HMAC-SHA-1 (AAA-key, "IKE-preshared key" |
                           Session ID | Key-ID | EP-address)

   The values have the following meaning:

   AAA-key: A key derived by the peer and EAP server and transported to
   the authenticator [EAP-KEY].

   Session ID: The value as defined in the PANA protocol [PANA-PROT],
   identifies a particular session of a client.


<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                 [Page 4]


               PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control  February 2004


   Key-ID: This identifies the AAA-key within a given session [PANA-
   PROT]. During the lifetime of the PANA session, there could be
   multiple EAP re-authentications. As EAP re-authentication changes the
   AAA-key, key-ID is used to identify the right AAA-key.

   EP-address: This is the address of the enforcement point with which
   the IKE exchange is being performed. When PAA is controlling multiple
   EPs, this provides a different pre-shared key for each of the EPs.

   The character "|" denotes concatenation as defined in [IKE].

   During EAP re-authentication, the AAA-key changes. Whenever the AAA-
   key changes, a new value of Key-ID is established between the PaC and
   PAA/EP as defined in [PANA-PROT]. If there is already an IKE SA or
   IPsec SA established, it MUST continue to be used till it expires. A
   change in the value of AAA-key MUST NOT result in re-negotiating a
   new IKE SA or IPsec SA immediately. But any new negotiation of IKE SA
   or IPsec SA MUST use the new pre-shared key derived from the latest
   AAA-key and is indicated by the Key-ID in the above equation.


6.0 IKE and IPsec details

   IKE [IKE] MUST be used for establishing the IPsec SA. The details
   specified in this document would work with IKEv2 [IKEV2] also. Any
   difference between them would be explicitly noted. PANA authenticates
   the client and derives the keys to protect the traffic. Hence, manual
   keying cannot be used. Aggressive mode with pre-shared key MUST be
   supported. PaC and EP SHOULD use its PANA session ID [PANA-PROT] as
   the payload of ID_KEY_ID in aggressive mode for establishing the
   phase I SA. IP addresses cannot be used as identifier as the PaC may
   be re-authenticated multiple times and hence may not uniquely
   identify the pre-shared key. For the same reason, main mode of IKE
   cannot be used as it requires addresses to be used as identifiers.

   After Phase I SA is established, quick mode exchange is performed to
   establish an ESP tunnel mode IPsec SA for protecting the traffic
   between PaC and EP. The identities used during Phase II are explained
   in the next section.

   As mentioned in section 4, there are multiple ways by which the PaC
   may configure the address before the IKE exchange starts. Most of the
   IKE implementations assume that they can consult the SPD during the
   IKE exchange for policy checks. In the case of address configuration
   using [RFC3456] or [IKE] [IKEV2] or [DHCP] [DHCPV6], EP can learn the
   address allocated to the client and hence setup the SPD before the
   IKE exchange starts. In the case of auto-configuration (which
   includes global address or addresses configured as in [PRIV]), EP may


<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                 [Page 5]


               PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control  February 2004

   not know the address assigned to the PaC. Thus, it may not be able to
   setup the SPD entries appropriately before IKE exchange starts. As
   most of the IKE implementations assume that the SPD can be consulted
   during the SA negotiation, it may require slightly a different
   behavior from IKE in the auto-configuration case. In the case of
   auto-configuration, IKE should be able to setup the SAs for the
   traffic selectors (which contains the PaC auto-configured address)
   specified by the PaC without requiring a corresponding entry in the
   SPD. If there is already an SA for the same address used by a
   different session as specified in the ID_KEY_ID payload, then the SA
   request MUST be rejected with INVALID-ID-INFORMATION [IKE]. If PaC
   establishes the IKE and IPsec SA successfully, EP should add the SPD
   entry for protecting the subsequent data packets.

7.0 Packet Formats

   Following acronyms are used throughout this document.

   PaC's link-local address is denoted by PAC-LINK-LOCAL.

   PaC's routable or global address is denoted by PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR.

   EP's link-local address is denoted by EP-LINK-LOCAL.

   The node with which the PaC is communicating is denoted by END-ADDR.

   In IPv4, the global address is used as both inner and outer source
   address of the tunneled packet. In IPv6, the link-local address is
   used as the outer header and the global address is used as the inner
   header of the tunneled packet.

   Following is the IPv4 packet format on the wire for packets sent from
   PaC to EP:

         IPv4 header      (source = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR,
                           destination = EP-LINK-LOCAL)
         ESP  header
         IPv4 header      (source = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR,
                           destination = END-ADDR)

   Following is the IPv6 packet format on the wire for packets sent from
   PaC to EP:

         IPv6 header      (source = PAC-LINK-LOCAL,
                           destination = EP-LINK-LOCAL)
         ESP  header
         IPv6 header      (source = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR,
                           destination = END-ADDR)



<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                 [Page 6]


               PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control  February 2004

   Following is the IPv4 packet format on the wire for packets sent from
   EP to PaC:

         IPv4 header      (source = EP-LINK-LOCAL,
                           destination = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR)
         ESP  header
         IPv4 header      (source = END-ADDR,
                           destination = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR)

   Following is the IPv6 packet format on the wire for packets sent from
   EP to PaC:

         IPv6 header      (source = EP-LINK-LOCAL,
                           destination = PAC-LINK-LOCAL)
         ESP  header
         IPv6 header      (source = END-ADDR,
                           destination = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR)

8.0 IPsec SPD entries

   The SPD entries for IPv4 and IPv6 are specified separately as they
   are different.

8.1 IPv4 SPD entries

   PaC's SPD OUT:
             IF source = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR & destination = any
              THEN USE ESP TUNNEL MODE SA:
              outer source = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR
              outer destination = EP-LINK-LOCAL

   PaC's SPD IN:
            IF source = any & destination = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR
             THEN USE ESP TUNNEL MODE SA:
             outer source = EP-LINK-LOCAL
             outer destination = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR

   EP's SPD OUT:
            IF source = any & destination = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR
             THEN USE ESP TUNEL MODE SA:
             outer source = EP-LINK-LOCAL
             outer destination = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR

   EP's SPD IN:
            IF source = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR & destination = any
             THEN USE ESP TUNNEL MODE SA:
              outer source = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR
              outer destination = EP-LINK-LOCAL



<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                 [Page 7]


               PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control  February 2004

   During the IPsec SA setup, PaC uses PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR as its phase 2
   identity (IDci) and EP uses ID_IPV4_ADDR_RANGE or ID_IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET
   as its phase 2 identity. The starting address is zero IP address and
   the end address is all ones for ID_IPV4_ADDR_RANGE. The starting
   address is zero IP address and the end address is all zeroes for
   ID_IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET.

8.2 IPv6 SPD entries

   The IPv6 SPD entries are slightly different from IPv4 to prevent the
   neighbor and router discovery [IPV6-ND] packets from being protected
   with IPsec. The first three entries of the following SPD tables
   bypass IPsec protection for neighbor and router discovery packets.
   The latest version of the IPsec [IPSEC-BIS] document allows traffic
   selectors to be based on ICMPv6 type and code values. In that case,
   the first three entries can be based on ICMPv6 type and code values.

   All traffic destined to global address is always sent to the default
   router (EP) i.e, the global prefix is not considered to be on-link.
   This can be achieved by turning off the "L" bit in the router
   advertisement.

   Pac's SPD OUT:

             IF source = ::/128  & destination = any
              THEN BYPASS

             IF source = fe80::/10 & destination = any
             THEN BYPASS

             IF source = any & destination = fe80::/10
              THEN BYPASS

             IF source = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR & destination = any
              THEN USE ESP TUNNEL MODE SA:
                 outer source = PAC-LINK-LOCAL
                 outer destination = EP-LINK-LOCAL

   PaC's SPD IN:

             IF source = ::/128 & destination = any
              THEN BYPASS

             IF source = fe80::/10 & destination = any
             THEN BYPASS

             IF source = any & destination = fe80::/10
              THEN BYPASS



<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                 [Page 8]


               PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control  February 2004

             IF source = any & destination = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR
                 THEN USE ESP TUNNEL MODE SA:
                    outer source = EP-LINK-LOCAL
                    outer destination = PAC-LINK-LOCAL

   EP's SPD OUT:

             IF source = ::/128 & destination = any
              THEN BYPASS

             IF source = fe80::/10 & destination = any
             THEN BYPASS

             IF source = any & destination = fe80::/10
              THEN BYPASS

             IF source = any & destination = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR
                 THEN USE ESP TUNNEL MODE SA:
                    outer source = EP-LINK-LOCAL
                    outer destination = PAC-LINK-LOCAL



   EP's SPD IN:

             IF source = ::/128 & destination = any
              THEN BYPASS

             IF source = fe80::/10 & destination = any
             THEN BYPASS

             IF source = any & destination = fe80::/10
              THEN BYPASS

             IF source = PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR & destination = any
              THEN USE ESP TUNNEL MODE SA:
                 outer source = PAC-LINK-LOCAL
                 outer destination = EP-LINK-LOCAL


   During the IPsec SA setup, PaC uses PAC-GLOBAL-ADDR as its phase 2
   identity (IDci) and EP uses ID_IPV6_ADDR_RANGE or ID_IPV6_ADDR_SUBNET
   as its phase 2 identity. The starting address is zero IP address and
   the end address is all ones for ID_IPV6_ADDR_RANGE. The starting
   address is zero IP address and the end address is all zeroes for
   ID_IPV6_ADDR_SUBNET.

9.0 Double IPsec



<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                 [Page 9]


               PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control  February 2004

   If the PaC uses IPsec for secure remote access e.g., Corporate VPN
   access, there will be separate SPD entries protecting the traffic to
   or from the remote network. In this case, IPsec may need to be
   applied twice, once for protecting the remote access and once for
   protecting the local access. This is the same as the iterative
   tunneling discussed in [IPSEC].

   When the IPsec SA is established with the remote security gateway,
   the IKE packets from the PaC to the remote security gateway may or
   may not need IPsec protection on the local link depending on the
   configuration at the EP. If EP requires IPsec protection for all
   packets, then the PaC should configure SPD entries appropriately so
   that IKE packets destined to EP are bypassed whereas IKE packets to
   the remote SG are protected. If EP does not require IPsec protection
   for IKE packets destined to remote security gateway, it needs to
   configure SPD entries that would bypass them.


10.0 Security considerations

   This document discusses the use of IPsec for access control when PANA
   is used for authenticating the clients to the access network.

   If the PAA does not verify whether PaC is authorized to use an IP
   address, it is possible for the PaC to steal the traffic destined to
   some other PaC. Although section 6 describes an inner address
   verification method based on SPD consulting, it is still possible for
   an authenticated PaC to launch this attack. PAA may use other
   mechanisms to prevent this attack [SEND].

   When IPv6 is used, the SPD entries bypass all link-local traffic
   without applying IPsec. This should not be a limitation as the link-
   local address is used only by link-local services e.g.
   neighbor/router discovery, which uses a different mechanism to
   protect their traffic. Moreover, this limitation may not be there in
   the future if IPsec extends the SPD selectors to specify ICMP types.

11.0 Normative References

   Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", BCP 9,
      RFC 2026, October 1996.

   [IPSEC] S. Kent et al., "Security Architecture for the Internet
      Protocol", RFC 2401, November 1998

   [PANA-PROT] D. Fosberg et al., "Protocol for Carrying Authentication
      for Network Access", draft-ietf-pana-03.txt




<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                [Page 10]


               PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control  February 2004

   [PANA-THREATS] M. Parthasarathy, "PANA Threat analysis and security
      requirements", draft-ietf-pana-threats-eval-04.txt

12.0 Informative References

   [PANAREQ] A. Yegin et al., "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for
      Network Access (PANA) Requirements and Terminology", draft-ietf-
      pana-requirements-04.txt

   [PANA-FRAME] P. Jayaraman et al., "PANA Framework", draft-ohba-pana-
      framework-00.txt

   [KEYWORDS] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCS to indicate
      requirement levels", RFC 2119, March 1997

   [IKE] D. Harkins et al., "Internet Key Exchange", RFC 2409, November
      1998

   [IKEV2] C. Kauffman et al., "Internet Key Exchange(IKEv2) Protocol",
      draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-11.txt

   [IPSEC-BIS] S. Kent, "Security Architecture for the Internet
      Protocol", draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis-00.txt

   [DHCP] R. Droms, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC 2131,
      March 1997

   [RFC3456] B. Patel et al., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
      (DHCPv4) Configuration of IPsec Tunnel Mode", RFC 3456, January
      2003

   [DHCPV6] R. Droms et. al, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
      IPv6", RFC 3315, July 2003

   [IPV6-ND] T. Narten et al., "Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6
      (IPv6) ", RFC 2461, December 1998

   [IPV6-CONF] S. Thomson et. al, "IPv6 Stateless Address
      Autoconfiguration", RFC 2462, December 1998

   [PRIV] T. Narten et al., "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address
      Autoconfiguration in IPv6", RFC 3041, January 2001

   [EAP-KEY] D. Simon et al., "EAP Key Management Framework", draft-
      ietf-eap-keying-01.txt

   [SEND] J. Arkko et al., "Secure Neighbor Discovery", draft-ietf-send-
      ndopt-03.txt



<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                [Page 11]


               PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control  February 2004

   [IPV4-LINK] B. Aboba et al., "Dynamic configuration of Link-local
      IPv4 addresses", draft-ietf-zeroconf-ipv4-linklocal-12.txt

   [IPV4-PRIV] Y. Rekhter et al., "Address Allocation for Private
      Internets", BCP 5, RFC 1918, February 1996

   [IEEE80211i] IEEE Draft 802.11I/D5.0, "Draft Supplement to STANDARD
      FOR Telecommunications and Information Exchange between Systems –
      LAN/MAN Specific Requirements - Part 11: Wireless Medium Access
      Control (MAC) and physical layer specifications: Specification for
      Enhanced Security", August 2003.

13.0 Acknowledgments

   The author would like to thank Francis Dupont, Pasi Eronen, Yoshihiro
   Ohba, Jari Arkko, Hannes Tschofenig and other PANA WG members for
   their valuable comments and discussions.

14.0 Revision log

   Changes between revision 01 and 02

   -Updated the draft with the fixes for all open issues
   -Added the IP configuration section
   -Modified the IKE pre-shared key derivation to handle PAA controlling
   multiple EPs
   -Clarification regarding DHCP usage and RFC3456 usage.
   -Only aggressive mode to be supported. Main mode not needed anymore.

   Changes between revision 00 and 01

   -Specified the use of ESP tunnel mode SA instead of IP-IP transport
   mode SA after working group discussion.
   -Specified the IKE pre-shared key derivation.


15.0 Author's Addresses

   Mohan Parthasarathy
   313 Fairchild Drive
   Mountain View CA-94043

   Phone: 408-734-8820
   Email: mohanp@sbcglobal.net

16.0 Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003).  All Rights Reserved.



<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                [Page 12]


               PANA enabling IPsec based Access Control  February 2004

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.


   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

   Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.






















<Parthasarathy>          Expires August 2004                [Page 13]