PKIX Working Group Serguei Leontiev, CRYPTO-PRO Internet Draft Dennis Shefanovskij, DEMOS Co Ltd Expires October 1, 2004 April 1, 2004 Intended Category: Informational Using the GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94 algorithms with the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and CRL Profile. <draft-ietf-pkix-gost-cppk-01.txt> Status of this Memo This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. Comments or suggestions for improvement may be done via "ietf-pkix" mailing list, or directly to the authors. Abstract This document describes identifiers and appropriate parameters for the algorithms GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, GOST R 34.11-94, and also ASN.1 encoding scheme for digital signatures and public keys, used in Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). This specification extends [RFC3279], "Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile" and, correspondingly, [RFC3280], "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile". All implementations of Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 1]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 this specification MUST also satisfy the requirements of [RFC3280]. Table of Contents 1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 Algorithm Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1 One-way Hash Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1.1 One-way Hash Function GOST R 34.11-94 . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2 Signature Algorithms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2.1 Signature Algorithm GOST R 34.10-94 . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2.2 Signature Algorithm GOST R 34.10-2001 . . . . . . . . . 6 2.3 Subject Public Key Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.3.1 GOST R 34.10-94 Keys. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.3.2 GOST R 34.10-2001 Keys. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3 Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Acknowledgments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Author's Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 1 Introduction The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. This document defines identifiers and corresponding algorithm parameters and attributes proposed by CRYPTO-PRO Company within "Russian Cryptographic Software Compatibility Agreement" community for the algorithms GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, GOST R 34.11-94, key derivation algorithms based on GOST R 34.10-94 public keys, key derivation algorithms based on GOST R 34.10-2001 public keys, and also ASN.1 encoding [X.660] for digital signatures and public keys, used in Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). This specification extends [RFC3279], "Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile" and, correspondingly, [RFC3280], "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile". All implementations of this specification MUST also satisfy the requirements of [RFC3280]. This specification defines the content of the signatureAlgorithm, signatureValue, signature, and subjectPublicKeyInfo fields within Internet X.509 certificates and CRLs. This document defines the use of one-way hash-function GOST R 34.11-94 [GOST3411] with digital signatures. This algorithm is used Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 2]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 in conjunction with digital signature algorithms. This specification describes the encoding of digital signatures, generated with the following cryptographic algorithms: * GOST R 34.10-94; * GOST R 34.10-2001. This document also defines the contents of the subjectPublicKeyInfo field for Internet X.509 certificates. For each algorithm, the appropriate alternatives for the keyUsage extension are provided. This specification describes encoding formats for public keys used with the following cryptographic algorithms: * GOST R 34.10-94 [GOST341094]; * GOST R 34.10-2001 [GOST34102001]; * Key derivation algorithm VKO GOST R 34.10-94 [CPALGS]; * Key derivation algorithm VKO GOST R 34.10-2001 [CPALGS]; ASN.1 modules, including all the definitions used in this document can be found in [CPALGS]. 2 Algorithm Support This section is an overview of cryptographic algorithms, that may be used within the Internet X.509 certificates and CRL profile [RFC3280]. It describes one-way hash functions and digital signature algorithms, that may be used to sign certificates and CRLs, and identifies OIDs and ASN.1 encoding for public keys contained in a certificate. The conforming CAs and/or applications MUST fully support digital signatures and public keys for at least one of the specified algorithms. 2.1 One-way Hash Function This section identifies the use of one-way, collision free hash function GOST R 34.11-94 - the only one that can be used in digital signature algorithms GOST R 34.10-94/2001. The data that is hashed for certificates and CRL signing is fully described in [RFC3280]. 2.1.1 One-way Hash Function GOST R 34.11-94 GOST R 34.11-94 has been developed by "GUBS of Federal Agency Government Communication and Information" and "All-Russian Scientific and Research Institute of Standardization". The algorithm GOST R 34.11-94 produces a 256-bit hash value of the arbitrary finite bit Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 3]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 length input. This document does not contain GOST R 34.11-94 full specification, which can be found in [GOSTR3411] in Russian. It's brief technical description in english can be found in [Schneier95], ch. 18.11, p. 454. This function is always used with default parameter set gostR3411CryptoProParamSetAI (see section 8.2 of [CPALGS]). 2.2 Signature Algorithms Conforming CAs may use GOST R 34.10-94 or GOST R 34.10-2001 signature algorithms to sign certificates and CRLs. The signatureAlgorithm field of Certificate or CertificateList indicates the signature algorithm ID, and associated parameters. This section also defines algorithm identifiers and parameters that MUST be used in the signatureAlgorithm field in a Certificate or CertificateList. Signature algorithms are always used conjointly with a one-way hash function GOST R 34.11-94 as indicated in [GOSTR341094] and [GOSTR34102001]. This section identifies OIDs for GOST R 34.10-94 and GOST R 34.10-2001 algorithms. The contents of the parameters component for each algorithm may vary and details are provided below for each algorithm separately. 2.2.1 Signature Algorithm GOST R 34.10-94 GOST R 34.10-94 has been developed by "GUBS of Federal Agency Government Communication and Information" and "All-Russian Scientific and Research Institute of Standardization". This signature algorithm MUST be used conjointly with one-way, collision free hash function GOST R 34.11-94. This document does not contain GOST R 34.10-94 standard description, which is fully described in [GOSTR341094] in Russian, and brief description in English could be found in [Schneier95] ch. 20.3, p. 495. The ASN.1 OID used to identify GOST R 34.10-94 signature algorithm in fields signatureAlgorithm in Certificate and CertificateList is: id-CryptoPro-algorithms OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2) ru(643) rans(2) cryptopro(2) } id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-94 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-CryptoPro-algorithms gostR3411-94-with-gostR3410-94(4)} GostR3410-94-CertificateSignatureAlgorithms ALGORITHM-IDENTIFIER ::= { Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 4]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 { NULL IDENTIFIED BY id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-94 } | { GostR3410-94-PublicKeyParameters IDENTIFIED BY id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-94 } } GostR3410-94-PublicKeyParameters are defined in section 2.3.1. When the id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-94 algorithm identifier appears in an AlgorithmIdentifier and parameters are omitted, the parameters from the public key of the signer's certificate MUST be used. If the parameters from the public key of the signer's certificate are also omited, and it's issuer's certificate has the same public key algorithm, parameters from the public key of the issuer's certificate MUST be used, and so on. Signature algorithm GOST R 34.10-94 generates digital signature in the form of a binary 512-bit vector (<r'>256||<s>256). That is, the least-significant (1-st) bit of signatureValue BIT STRING contains the least-significant (1-st) bit of <s>, and the most-significant (512th) bit of signatureValue contains the most-significant (256th) bit of <r'>. 2.2.2 Signature Algorithm GOST R 34.10-2001 GOST R 34.10-2001 was developed by "GUBS of Federal Agency Government Communication and Information" and "All-Russian Scientific and Research Institute of Standardization". This signature algorithm MUST be used conjointly with one-way, collision free hash function GOST R 34.11-94. This document does not contain GOST R 34.10-2001 standard description, which is fully described in [GOSTR34102001]. The ASN.1 OID used to identify GOST R 34.10-2001 signature algorithm in fields signatureAlgorithm of Certificate and CertificateList is: id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-2001 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-CryptoPro-algorithms gostR3411-94-with-gostR3410-2001(3) } GostR3410-2001-CertificateSignatureAlgorithms ALGORITHM-IDENTIFIER ::= { { NULL IDENTIFIED BY id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-2001 } | { GostR3410-2001-PublicKeyParameters IDENTIFIED BY id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-2001 } } GostR3410-2001-PublicKeyParameters are defined in section 2.3.2. When the id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-2001 algorithm identifier appears in an AlgorithmIdentifier and parameters are omitted, the Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 5]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 parameters from the public key of the signer's certificate MUST be used. If the parameters from the public key of the signer's certificate are also omited, and it's issuer's certificate has the same public key algorithm, parameters from the public key of the issuer's certificate MUST be used, and so on. Signature algorithm GOST R 34.10-2001 generates digital signature in the form of a binary 512-bit vector (<r'>256||<s>256). That is, the least-significant (1-st) bit of signatureValue BIT STRING contains the least-significant (1-st) bit of <s>, and the most-significant (512th) bit of signatureValue contains the most-significant (256th) bit of <r'>. 2.3 Subject Public Key Algorithms In according to [RFC3280] the certificates may contain a public key for any algorithm. Within the framework of this specification the only GOST R 34.10-94 and GOST R 34.10-2001 public key algorithms defined. The algorithm and associated parameters are definable as OID in certificate through ASN.1 structure AlgorithmIdentifier. This section identifies defines OID and public key parameters for the GOST R 34.10-94 and GOST R 34.10-2001 algorithms. The appropriate CA MUST use the predefined OID issuing certificates containing public keys for these algorithms. The appropriate applications supporting any of these algorithms MUST fully recognize the OID identified in this section 2.3.1 GOST R 34.10-94 Keys This section defines OID and parameter encoding for inclusion of GOST R 34.10-94 public key in certificate. Such public key can be used for digital signature validation algorithm GOST R 34.10-94 [GOSTR341094], and for key derivation algorithm VKO GOST R 34.10-94 [CPALGS]. An assumed cryptographic key usage MAY be specified by keyUsage extension [RFC3280]. The usage of the same key for signature and key derivation is NOT RECOMMENDED, but possible. Public key OID for GOST R 34.10-94 declared in this document is: id-GostR3410-94 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-CryptoPro-algorithms gostR3410-94(20) } SubjectPublicKeyInfo.algorithm.algorithm field (see [RFC3280]) for GOST R 34.10-94 keys MUST be id-GostR3410-94; Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 6]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 SubjectPublicKeyInfo.algorithm.parameters in this case MUST have the following structure: GostR3410-94-PublicKeyParameters ::= SEQUENCE { publicKeyParamSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER, digestParamSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER, encryptionParamSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER OPTIONAL } where: * publicKeyParamSet - public key parameters identifier for GOST R 34.10-94 (see section 8.3 of [CPALGS]) * digestParamSet - parameters identifier for GOST R 34.11-94 (see section 8.2 of [CPALGS]) * encryptionParamSet - optional parameters identifier for GOST 28147-89 (see section 8.1 of [CPALGS]) MAY be present in any certificate and MUST be present if keyUsage includes keyAgreement or keyEnchiperment. If GOST R 34.10-94 algorithm parameters are omitted in subjectPublicKeyInfo, and CA signs subject certificate using GOST R 34.10-94, then GOST R 34.10-94 parameters taken from subjectPublicKeyInfo field of issuer certificate are applicable to public key of GOST R 34.10-94 subject. That is, cryptographic parameters inheritance takes place. If subjectPublicKeyInfo AlgorithmIdentifier field contain no parameters, but CA sign certificate using signature algorithm different from GOST R 34.10-94, such certificate MUST be rejected by conforming applications. Public key GOST R 34.10-94 MUST be ASN.1 encoded in following way. In GOST R 34.10-94 public key is a number y = a^x (mod p), where a and p - parameters, and y is a bit-vector (<y>1024), at that encoding should present <y>1024 (BIT STRING) as a vector holding data in a little-endian. At first, a key is presented as an OCTET STRING, and then, being DER-encoded, presented as a BIT STRING. GostR3410-94-PublicKey ::= BIT STRING GostR3410-94-PublicKeyOctetString ::= OCTET STRING If the keyUsage extension is present in an end-entity certificate, which contains a GOST R 34.10-94 public key, the following values MAY be present: Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 7]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 digitalSignature; nonRepudiation. keyEncipherment; keyAgreement. If the keyAgreement or keyEnchiperment extension is present in a certificate GOST R 34.10-94 public key, the following values MAY be present as well: encipherOnly; decipherOnly. The keyUsage extension MUST NOT assert both encipherOnly and decipherOnly. If the keyUsage extension is present in an CA or CRL signer certificate which contain a GOST R 34.10-94 public key, the following values MAY be present: digitalSignature; nonRepudiation; keyCertSign; cRLSign. 2.3.2 GOST R 34.10-2001 Keys This section defines OID and parameter encoding for inclusion of GOST R 34.10-2001 public key in certificate. Such public key can be used for digital signature validation algorithm GOST R 34.10-2001 [GOSTR34102001], and for key derivation algorithm VKO GOST R 34.10-2001 [CPALGS]. An assumed cryptographic key usage MAY be specified by keyUsage extension [RFC3280]. The usage of the same key for signature and key derivation is NOT RECOMMENDED, but possible. Public key OID for GOST R 34.10-2001 declared in this document is: id-GostR3410-2001 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-CryptoPro-algorithms gostR3410-2001(19) } SubjectPublicKeyInfo.algorithm.algorithm field (see [RFC3280]) for GOST R 34.10-2001 keys MUST be id-GostR3410-2001; SubjectPublicKeyInfo.algorithm.parameters in this case MUST have the following structure: GostR3410-2001-PublicKeyParameters ::= Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 8]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 SEQUENCE { publicKeyParamSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER, digestParamSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER, encryptionParamSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER OPTIONAL } where: * publicKeyParamSet - public key parameters identifier for GOST R 34.10-2001 (see section 8.4 of [CPALGS]) * digestParamSet - parameters identifier for GOST R 34.11-94 (see section 8.2 of [CPALGS]) * encryptionParamSet - optional parameters identifier for GOST 28147-89 (see section 8.1 of [CPALGS]) MAY be present in any certificate and MUST be present if keyUsage includes keyAgreement or keyEnchiperment. If GOST R 34.10-2001 algorithm parameters are omitted in subjectPublicKeyInfo, and CA signs subject certificate using GOST R 34.10-2001, then GOST R 34.10-2001 parameters taken from subjectPublicKeyInfo field of issuer certificate are applicable to public key of GOST R 34.10-2001 subject. That is, cryptographic parameters inheritance takes place. If subjectPublicKeyInfo AlgorithmIdentifier field contain no parameters, but CA sign certificate using signature algorithm different from GOST R 34.10-2001, such certificate MUST be rejected by conforming applications. GOST R 34.10-2001 public key MUST be ASN.1 encoded in a following way. GOST R 34.10-2001 specifies that public key is a point on the elliptic curve Q = dP, where d is a private key, P is a base point, and Q presents in a way of 512-bit vector (<Xq>256||<Yq>256). This vector is DER-encoded as two data blocks. At first, <Xq>256 block, then <Yq>256 block. subjectPublicKey field BIT STRING type is presented as a taken up object GostR3410-2001-PublicKeyOctetString. At that, least-significant of the first octet (GostR3410-2001-PublicKeyOctetString[0]) corresponds to least- significant (1-st) of vector <Xq>256||<Yq>256 (Yq1 = (GostR3410-2001-PublicKeyOctetString[0] & 1)). Whereas most-significant of 64-th octet (GostR3410-2001-PublicKeyOctetString[63]) corresponds to most- significant (512-d) of vector <Xq>256||<Yq>256 (Xq256 = ((GostR3410-2001-PublicKeyOctetString[63] & 0x80)>>7)). Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 9]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 In other words, <Xq>256||<Yq>256 vector is stored in little-endian, that correspond binary vector form and their concatenation in GOST R 34.10-2001 ch. 5.3. At first, key is placed in OCTET STRING, than is DER-encoded and placed in BIT STRING. GostR3410-2001-PublicKey ::= BIT STRING GostR3410-2001-PublicKeyOctetString ::= OCTET STRING If the keyUsage extension is present in an end-entity certificate, which conveys a GOST R 34.10-2001 public key, the following values MAY be present: digitalSignature, nonRepudiation, keyEncipherment, keyAgreement. If the keyAgreement or keyEnchiperment extension is present in a certificate, the following values MAY be present: encipherOnly, decipherOnly. The keyUsage extension MUST NOT assert both encipherOnly and decipherOnly. If the keyUsage extension is present in an CA or CRL signer certificate which contain a GOST R 34.10-2001 public key, the following values MAY be present: digitalSignature, nonRepudiation, keyCertSign, cRLSign. 3 Security Considerations It is RECCOMENDED, that applications verify signature values and subject public keys to conform to [GOSTR34102001], [GOSTR341094] standards prior to their use. When certificate is used as analogue to a manual signing, in the context of Russian Federal Digital Signature Law [RFDSL], certificate MUST contain keyUsage extension, it MUST be critical, and keyUsage MUST NOT include keyEncipherment and keyAgreement. When certificate validity period (typicaly 5 years for end entities Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 10]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 and 7 years for CAs in Russia) is not equal to the private key validity period (typicaly 15 months in Russia) it is RECOMENDED to use private key usage period extension. For security discussion concerning use of algorithm parameters, see section Security Considerations from [CPALGS]. 4 References [GOST28147] "Cryptographic Protection for Data Processing Sys- tem", GOST 28147-89, Gosudarstvennyi Standard of USSR, Government Committee of the USSR for Standards, 1989. (In Russian); [GOSTR341094] "Information technology. Cryptographic Data Security. Produce and check procedures of Electronic Digital Signatures based on Asymmetric Cryptographic Algo- rithm.", GOST R 34.10-94, Gosudarstvennyi Standard of Russian Federation, Government Committee of the Rus- sia for Standards, 1994. (In Russian); [GOSTR34102001] "Information technology. Cryptographic data security. Signature and verification processes of [electronic] digital signature.", GOST R 34.10-2001, Gosudarstven- nyi Standard of Russian Federation, Government Com- mittee of the Russia for Standards, 2001. (In Rus- sian); [GOSTR341194] "Information technology. Cryptographic Data Security. Hashing function.", GOST R 34.10-94, Gosudarstvennyi Standard of Russian Federation, Government Committee of the Russia for Standards, 1994. (In Russian); [RFDSL] Russian Federal Digital Signature Law, 10 Jan 2002 N1-FZ [CPALGS] "Additional cryptographic algorithms for use with GOST 28147-89, GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, and GOST R 34.11-94 algorithms", V. Popov, I. Kurep- kin, S. Leontiev, February 2004, draft-popov-crypto- pro-cpalgs-01.txt work in progress; Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 11]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 [Schneier95] B. Schneier, Applied cryptography, second edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995; [RFC3280] Housley, R., Polk, W., Ford, W. and D. Solo, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile", RFC 3280, April 2002. [RFC3279] Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile. L. Bassham, W. Polk, R. Housley. April 2002. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key Words for Use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [TLS] The TLS Protocol Version 1.0. T. Dierks, C. Allen. January 1999, RFC 2246. [X.660] ITU-T Recommendation X.660 Information Technology - ASN.1 encoding rules: Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Dis- tinguished Encoding Rules (DER), 1997. Acknowledgments This document was created in accordance with "Russian Cryptographic Software Compatibility Agreement", signed by FGUE STC "Atlas", CRYPTO-PRO, Factor-TC, MD PREI, Infotecs GmbH, SPRCIS (SPbRCZI), Cryptocom, R-Alpha. The goal of this agreement is to achieve mutual compatibility of the products and solutions. The authors wish to thank: Microsoft Corporation Russia for provided information about company products and solutions, and also for technical consulting in PKI. RSA Security Russia and Demos Co Ltd for active colaboration and critical help in creation of this document. RSA Security Inc for compatibility testing of the proposed data Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 12]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 formats while incorporating them into RSA Keon product. Baltimore Technology plc for compatibility testing of the proposed data formats while incorporating them into UniCERT product. Russ Hously (Vigil Security, LLC, housley@vigilsec.com) and Vasilij Sakharov (DEMOS Co Ltd, svp@dol.ru) for initiative creating this document. This document is based on a contribution of CRYPTO-PRO company. Any substantial use of the text from this document must reference CRYPTO- PRO. CRYPTO-PRO requests that all material mentioning or referencing this document identify this as "CRYPTO-PRO CPPK". Author's Addresses Serguei Leontiev CRYPTO-PRO 38, Obraztsova, Moscow, 127018, Russian Federation EMail: lse@cryptopro.ru Dennis Shefanovski DEMOS Co Ltd 6/1, Ovchinnikovskaja naberezhnaya, Moscow, 113035, Russian Federation EMail: sdb@dol.ru Alexandr Afanasiev Factor-TC office 711, 14, Presnenskij val, Moscow, 123557, Russian Federation EMail: aaaf@factor-ts.ru Nikolaj Nikishin Infotecs GmbH p/b 35, 80-5, Leningradskij prospekt, Moscow, 125315, Russian Federation EMail: nikishin@infotecs.ru Boleslav Izotov FGUE STC "Atlas" 38, Obraztsova, Moscow, 127018, Russian Federation EMail: izotov@stcnet.ru Elena Minaeva MD PREI Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 13]

Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004 build 3, 6A, Vtoroj Troitskij per., Moscow, Russian Federation EMail: evminaeva@mo.msk.ru Serguei Murugov R-Alpha 4/1, Raspletina, Moscow, 123060, Russian Federation EMail: msm@office.ru Igori Ustinov Cryptocom office 239, 51, Leninskij prospekt, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation EMail: igus@cryptocom.ru Anatolij Erkin SPRCIS (SPbRCZI) 1, Obrucheva, St.Petersburg, 195220, Russian Federation EMail: erkin@nevsky.net Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 14]

```
Internet-Draft Using GOST with PKIX April 2004
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Leontiev & Shefanovski Informational [Page 15]
```