Network Working Group                                      S. De Cnodder
Internet-Draft                                                   Alcatel
Expires: January 8, 2006                                      N. Jonnala
                                                                M. Chiba
                                                     Cisco Systems, Inc.
                                                            July 7, 2005


                    Dynamic Authorization Server MIB
              draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-server-mib-01.txt

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on January 8, 2006.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

Abstract

   This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
   for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
   In particular, it describes the RADIUS dynamic authorization server
   (DAS) functions that support the dynamic authorization extensions as
   defined in RFC 3576.




De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


Table of Contents

   1.   Requirements notation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.   Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.   The Internet-Standard Management Framework . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.   Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   5.   Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   6.   RADIUS Dynamic Authorization Server MIB Definitions  . . . .   9
   7.   Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
   8.   IANA considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  21
   9.   Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  22
   10.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  23
     10.1   Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  23
     10.2   Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  23
        Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  24
        Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . .  25



































De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


1.  Requirements notation

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].














































De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


2.  Introduction

   This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
   for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
   It is becoming increasingly important to support Dynamic
   Authorization extensions on the network access server (NAS) devices
   to handle the Disconnect and Change-of-Authorization (CoA) messages
   as described in [RFC3576] .  As a result, the effective management of
   RADIUS Dynamic Authorization entities is of considerable importance.
   It complements the managed objects used for managing RADIUS
   authentication and accounting clients as described in [RFC2618] and
   [RFC2620], respectively.







































De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


3.  The Internet-Standard Management Framework

   For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
   Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of
   [RFC3410].

   Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
   the Management Information Base or MIB.  MIB objects are generally
   accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
   Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the
   Structure of Management Information (SMI).  This memo specifies a MIB
   module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58,
   RFC2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC2580
   [RFC2580].





































De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


4.  Terminology

   Dynamic Authorization Server (DAS)

   The component that resides on the NAS which processes the Disconnect
   and CoA requests sent by the Dynamic Authorization Client as
   described in [RFC3576].

   Dynamic Authorization Client (DAC)

   The component which sends the Disconnect and CoA requests to the
   Dynamic Authorization Server as described in [RFC3576].  This is
   typically a RADIUS Server, but is not limited to it and may, for
   example, be a Rating Engine used for Prepaid Billing.

   Dynamic Authorization Server Port

   The UDP port on which the Dynamic Authorization server listens for
   the Disconnect and CoA requests sent by the Dynamic Authorization
   Client.































De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


5.  Overview

   The RADIUS dynamic authorization extensions defined in [RFC3576],
   distinguish between the client function and the server function.  In
   RADIUS dynamic authorization, clients send Disconnect-Requests and
   CoA-Requests, and servers reply with Disconnect-Acks, CoA-Acks, and
   CoA-NAKs.  Typically NAS devices implement the DAS function, and thus
   would be expected to implement the RADIUS dynamic authorization
   server MIB, while DACs implement the client function, and thus would
   be expected to implement the RADIUS dynamic authorization client MIB.

   However, it is possible for a RADIUS dynamic authorization entity to
   perform both client and server functions.  For example, a RADIUS
   proxy may act as a DAS to one or more DACs, while simultaneously
   acting as a DAC to one or more DASs.  In such situations, it is
   expected that RADIUS entities combining client and server
   functionality will support both the client and server MIBs.

   This memo describes the MIB for dynamic authorization servers and
   relates to the following documents as follows:

   [RFC2618] describes the MIB for a RADIUS authentication client.

   [RFC2619] describes the MIB for a RADIUS authentication server.

   [RFC2620] describes the MIB for a RADIUS accounting client.

   [RFC2621] describes the MIB for a RADIUS accounting server.

   [DYNCLNT] describes the MIB for a RADIUS dynamic authorization
   client.

   A NAS typically implements the MIBs for a RADIUS authentication
   client, a RADIUS accounting client, and a RADIUS dynamic
   authorization server.  However, there is not strict relationship
   between these three MIBs, i.e. one MIB can be implemented without
   implementing the other MIBs.  Similarly, for the other 3 MIBs
   mentioned above, a typical case would be where the MIBs for a RADIUS
   authentication server, a RADIUS accounting server, and a RADIUS
   dynamic authorization client are implemented by the same device.
   However, also for these 3 MIBs, they can be implemented independent
   from each other.  A RADIUS proxy might implement any of these 6 MIBs,
   but can also implement any subset of these MIBs.








De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006                [Page 7]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


              +---------------+                      +---------------+
    User 1----|               |  Disconnect-Request  |               |
              |    Dynamic    |     CoA-Request      |    Dynamic    |
    User 2----| Authorization |<---------------------| Authorization |
              |    Server     |--------------------->|    Client     |
    User 3----|     (DAS)     |    Disconnect-Ack    |     (DAC)     |
              |               |    Disconnect-NAK    |               |
              +---------------+    CoA-Ack/CoA-NAK   +---------------+

   Figure 1: Mapping of clients and servers.

   This MIB module for the dynamic authorization server contains the
   following:

   1.  Two scalar objects

   2.  One Dynamic Authorization Client Table.  This table contains one
   row for each DAC with which the DAS shares a secret.

































De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006                [Page 8]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


6.  RADIUS Dynamic Authorization Server MIB Definitions

   RADIUS-DYNAUTH-SERVER-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

   IMPORTS
          MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE,
          Counter32, Integer32, mib-2      FROM SNMPv2-SMI
          SnmpAdminString                  FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB
          InetAddressType, InetAddress     FROM INET-ADDRESS-MIB
          MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP  FROM SNMPv2-CONF;

   radiusDynAuthServerMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
          LAST-UPDATED "200507020000Z" -- 2 July 2005
          ORGANIZATION "IETF RADEXT Working Group"
          CONTACT-INFO
                 " Stefaan De Cnodder
                   Alcatel
                   Francis Wellesplein 1
                   B-2018 Antwerp
                   Belgium

                   Phone: +32 3 240 85 15
                   EMail: stefaan.de_cnodder@alcatel.be

                   Nagi Reddy Jonnala
                   Cisco Systems, Inc.
                   Divyasree Chambers, B Wing,
                   O'Shaugnessy Road,
                   Bangalore-560027, India.

                   Phone: +91 98456 99445
                   EMail: njonnala@cisco.com

                   Murtaza Chiba
                   Cisco Systems, Inc.
                   170 West Tasman Dr.
                   San Jose CA, 95134

                   Phone: +1 408 525 7198
                   EMail: mchiba@cisco.com "
          DESCRIPTION
              "The MIB module for entities implementing the server
               side of the Dynamic Authorization extensions Remote
               Access Dialin User Service (RADIUS) protocol.

               Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  This initial
               version of this MIB module was published in RFC yyyy;
               for full legal notices see the RFC itself.  Supplementary



De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006                [Page 9]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


               information may be available on
               http://www.ietf.org/copyrights/ianamib.html."
   -- RFC Ed.: replace yyyy with actual RFC number & remove this note

          REVISION "200507020000Z" -- 2 July 2005
          DESCRIPTION "Initial version as published in RFC yyyy."
   -- RFC Ed.: replace yyyy with actual RFC number & remove this note
          ::= { radiusDynamicAuthorization 1 }

   radiusDynamicAuthorization    OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { mib-2 xxx }
   -- The value xxx to be assigned by IANA.

   radiusDynAuthServerMIBObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
                                         { radiusDynAuthServerMIB 1 }

   radiusDynAuthServer           OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
                                  { radiusDynAuthServerMIBObjects 1 }

   radiusDynAuthServerDisconInvalidClientAddresses OBJECT-TYPE
         SYNTAX Counter32
         MAX-ACCESS read-only
         STATUS current
         DESCRIPTION
               "The number of Disconnect messages received from unknown
                addresses."
         ::= { radiusDynAuthServer 1 }

   radiusDynAuthServerCoAInvalidClientAddresses OBJECT-TYPE
         SYNTAX Counter32
         MAX-ACCESS read-only
         STATUS current
         DESCRIPTION
               "The number of CoA messages received from unknown
                addresses."
         ::= { radiusDynAuthServer 2 }

   radiusDynAuthServerIdentifier OBJECT-TYPE
         SYNTAX SnmpAdminString
         MAX-ACCESS read-only
         STATUS current
         DESCRIPTION
                "The NAS-Identifier of the RADIUS dynamic authorization
                 server."
         REFERENCE
                "RFC 2865, Section 5.32, NAS-Identifier."
         ::= { radiusDynAuthServer 3 }

   radiusDynAuthClientTable OBJECT-TYPE



De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 10]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


         SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF RadiusDynAuthClientEntry
         MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
         STATUS     current
         DESCRIPTION
               "The (conceptual) table listing the RADIUS dynamic
                authorization clients with which the server shares a
                secret."
         ::= { radiusDynAuthServer 4 }

   radiusDynAuthClientEntry OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     RadiusDynAuthClientEntry
          MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "An entry (conceptual row) representing one Dynamic
                 Authorization Client with which the server shares a
                 secret."
          INDEX      { radiusDynAuthClientIndex }
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientTable 1 }

   RadiusDynAuthClientEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          radiusDynAuthClientIndex                     Integer32,
          radiusDynAuthClientAddressType               InetAddressType,
          radiusDynAuthClientAddress                   InetAddress,
          radiusDynAuthServDisconRequests              Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServDupDisconRequests           Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServDisconAcks                  Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServDisconNaks                  Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServDisconUserSessRemoved       Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServMalformedDisconRequests     Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServDisconBadAuthenticators     Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServDisconPacketsDropped        Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServCoARequests                 Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServDupCoARequests              Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServCoAAcks                     Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServCoANaks                     Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServCoAUserSessChanged          Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServMalformedCoARequests        Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServCoABadAuthenticators        Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServCoAPacketsDropped           Counter32,
          radiusDynAuthServUnknownTypes                Counter32
   }


   radiusDynAuthClientIndex OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Integer32 (1..2147483647)
          MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
          STATUS     current



De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 11]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


          DESCRIPTION
                "A number uniquely identifying each RADIUS dynamic
                 authorization client with which this Dynamic
                 Authorization Server communicates. This number is
                 allocated by the agent implementing this MIB module,
                 and is unique in this context."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 1 }

   radiusDynAuthClientAddressType OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     InetAddressType
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The type of IP-Address of the RADIUS Dynamic
                 Authorization Client referred to in this table entry."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 2 }

   radiusDynAuthClientAddress OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     InetAddress
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The IP-Address value of the RADIUS Dynamic
                 Authorization Client referred to in this table entry."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 3 }

   radiusDynAuthServDisconRequests OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "requests"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of RADIUS Disconnect-Requests received
                 from this Dynamic Authorization Client."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.1, Disconnect Messages (DM)."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 4 }

   radiusDynAuthServDupDisconRequests OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "requests"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of duplicate RADIUS Disconnect-Request
                 packets received from this Dynamic Authorization
                 Client."
          REFERENCE



De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 12]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


                "RFC 3576, Section 2.1, Disconnect Messages (DM)."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 5 }

   radiusDynAuthServDisconAcks  OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "replies"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of RADIUS Disconnect-ACK packets
                 sent to this Dynamic Authorization Client"
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.1, Disconnect Messages (DM)."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 6 }

   radiusDynAuthServDisconNaks OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "replies"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of RADIUS Disconnect-NAK packets
                 sent to this Dynamic Authorization Client."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.1, Disconnect Messages (DM)."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 7 }

   radiusDynAuthServDisconUserSessRemoved OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "sessions"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of user sessions removed for the
                 Disconnect-Requests received from this
                 Dynamic Authorization Client. Depending on site
                 specific policies, a single Disconnect request
                 can remove multiple user sessions. In the case this
                 Dynamic Autorization Server has no knowledge of
                 the number of user sessions that are affected, then
                 it counts a single user session for each such
                 Disconnect-Request."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.1, Disconnect Messages (DM)."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 8 }

   radiusDynAuthServMalformedDisconRequests OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32



De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 13]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


          UNITS      "requests"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of malformed RADIUS Disconnect-Request
                 packets received from this Dynamic Authorization
                 client. Bad authenticators and unknown types are not
                 included as malformed Disconnect-Requests."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.1, Disconnect Messages (DM), and
                 Section 2.3, Packet Format."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 9 }

   radiusDynAuthServDisconBadAuthenticators OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "requests"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of RADIUS Disconnect-Request packets
                 which contained invalid Authenticator field
                 received from this Dynamic Authorization Client."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.1, Disconnect Messages (DM), and
                 Section 2.3, Packet Format."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 10 }

   radiusDynAuthServDisconPacketsDropped OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "requests"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of incoming Disconnect-Requests
                 from this Dynamic Authorization Client silently
                 discarded by the server application for some reason
                 other than malformed, bad authenticators or unknown
                 types."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.1, Disconnect Messages (DM), and
                 Section 2.3, Packet Format."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 11 }

   radiusDynAuthServCoARequests OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "requests"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current



De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 14]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of CoA requests received from this
                 Dynamic Authorization Client."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.2, Change-of-Authorization
                 Messages (CoA)."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 12 }

   radiusDynAuthServDupCoARequests OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "requests"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of duplicate RADIUS CoA-Request
                 packets received from this Dynamic Authorization
                 client."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.2, Change-of-Authorization
                 Messages (CoA)."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 13 }

   radiusDynAuthServCoAAcks  OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "replies"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of RADIUS CoA-ACK packets
                 sent to this Dynamic Authorization Client."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.2, Change-of-Authorization
                 Messages (CoA)."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 14 }

   radiusDynAuthServCoANaks OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "replies"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of RADIUS CoA-NAK packets
                 sent to this Dynamic Authorization Client."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.2, Change-of-Authorization
                 Messages (CoA)."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 15 }




De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 15]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


   radiusDynAuthServCoAUserSessChanged OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "sessions"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of user sessions authorization
                 changed for the CoA-Requests received from this
                 Dynamic Authorization Client. Depending on site
                 specific policies, a single CoA request can change
                 multiple user sessions' authorization.  In the case
                 this Dynamic Autorization Server has no knowledge of
                 the number of user sessions that are affected, then
                 it counts a single user session for each such
                 CoA-Request."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.2, Change-of-Authorization
                 Messages (CoA)."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 16 }

   radiusDynAuthServMalformedCoARequests OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "requests"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of malformed RADIUS CoA-Request
                 packets received from this Dynamic Authorization
                 Client. Bad authenticators and unknown types are not
                 included as malformed CoA-Requests."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.2, Change-of-Authorization
                 Messages (CoA), and Section 2.3, Packet Format."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry  17 }

   radiusDynAuthServCoABadAuthenticators OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "requests"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of RADIUS CoA-Request packets which
                 contained invalid Authenticator field received
                 from this Dynamic Authorization client."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.2, Change-of-Authorization
                 Messages (CoA), and Section 2.3, Packet Format."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 18 }



De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 16]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


   radiusDynAuthServCoAPacketsDropped OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "requests"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of incoming CoA packets from this
                 Dynamic Authorization Client silently discarded
                 by the server application for some reason other than
                 malformed, bad authenticators or unknown types."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.2, Change-of-Authorization
                 Messages (CoA), and Section 2.3, Packet Format."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 19 }

   radiusDynAuthServUnknownTypes OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX     Counter32
          UNITS      "requests"
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS     current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The number of incoming packets of unknown types
                 which were received on the Dynamic Authorization port."
          REFERENCE
                "RFC 3576, Section 2.3, Packet Format."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthClientEntry 20 }

   -- conformance information

   radiusDynAuthServerMIBConformance
          OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusDynAuthServerMIB 2 }
   radiusDynAuthServerMIBCompliances
          OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusDynAuthServerMIBConformance 1 }
   radiusDynAuthServerMIBGroups
          OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusDynAuthServerMIBConformance 2 }

   -- compliance statements

   radiusAuthServerMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
          STATUS  current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The compliance statement for entities implementing
                 the RADIUS Dynamic Authorization Server."
          MODULE  -- this module
          MANDATORY-GROUPS { radiusDynAuthServerMIBGroup }
          ::= { radiusDynAuthServerMIBCompliances 1 }

   -- units of conformance



De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 17]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


   radiusDynAuthServerMIBGroup OBJECT-GROUP
          OBJECTS { radiusDynAuthServerDisconInvalidClientAddresses,
                    radiusDynAuthServerCoAInvalidClientAddresses,
                    radiusDynAuthServerIdentifier,
                    radiusDynAuthClientAddressType,
                    radiusDynAuthClientAddress,
                    radiusDynAuthServDisconRequests,
                    radiusDynAuthServDupDisconRequests,
                    radiusDynAuthServDisconAcks,
                    radiusDynAuthServDisconNaks,
                    radiusDynAuthServDisconUserSessRemoved,
                    radiusDynAuthServMalformedDisconRequests,
                    radiusDynAuthServDisconBadAuthenticators,
                    radiusDynAuthServDisconPacketsDropped,
                    radiusDynAuthServCoARequests,
                    radiusDynAuthServDupCoARequests,
                    radiusDynAuthServCoAAcks,
                    radiusDynAuthServCoANaks,
                    radiusDynAuthServCoAUserSessChanged,
                    radiusDynAuthServMalformedCoARequests,
                    radiusDynAuthServCoABadAuthenticators,
                    radiusDynAuthServCoAPacketsDropped,
                    radiusDynAuthServUnknownTypes
                  }
          STATUS  current
          DESCRIPTION
                "The collection of objects providing management of
                 a RADIUS Dynamic Authorization Server."
          ::= { radiusDynAuthServerMIBGroups 1 }

   END




















De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 18]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


7.  Security Considerations

   There are no management objects defined in this MIB module that have
   a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create.  So, if this
   MIB module is implemented correctly, then there is no risk that an
   intruder can alter or create any management objects of this MIB
   module via direct SNMP SET operations

   Some of the readable objects in this MIB module (i.e., objects with a
   MAX-ACCESS other than not-accessible) may be considered sensitive or
   vulnerable in some network environments.  It is thus important to
   control even GET and/or NOTIFY access to these objects and possibly
   to even encrypt the values of these objects when sending them over
   the network via SNMP.  These are the tables and objects and their
   sensitivity/vulnerability:

   radiusDynAuthClientAddress and radiusDynAuthClientAddressType

   These can be used to determine the address of the DAC with which the
   DAS is communicating.  This information could be useful in mounting
   an attack on the DAC.

   radiusDynAuthServerIdentifier

   This can be used to determine the Identifier of the DAS.  This
   information could be useful in impersonating the DAS.

   The other readable objects are not really considered as being
   sensitive or vulnerable.  These objects are:

   radiusDynAuthServerDisconInvalidClientAddresses,
   radiusDynAuthServerCoAInvalidClientAddresses,
   radiusDynAuthServDisconRequests,
   radiusDynAuthServDupDisconRequests,
   radiusDynAuthServDisconAcks,
   radiusDynAuthServDisconNaks,
   radiusDynAuthServDisconUserSessRemoved,
   radiusDynAuthServMalformedDisconRequests,
   radiusDynAuthServDisconBadAuthenticators,
   radiusDynAuthServDisconPacketsDropped,
   radiusDynAuthServCoARequests,
   radiusDynAuthServDupCoARequests,
   radiusDynAuthServCoAAcks,
   radiusDynAuthServCoANaks,
   radiusDynAuthServCoAUserSessChanged,
   radiusDynAuthServMalformedCoARequests,
   radiusDynAuthServCoABadAuthenticators,
   radiusDynAuthServCoAPacketsDropped, and



De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 19]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


   radiusDynAuthServUnknownTypes.

   SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security.
   Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPSec),
   even then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is
   allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects
   in this MIB module.

   It is RECOMMENDED that implementers consider the security features as
   provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410], section 8),
   including full support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for
   authentication and privacy).

   Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT
   RECOMMENDED.  Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to
   enable cryptographic security.  It is then a customer/operator
   responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an
   instance of this MIB module is properly configured to give access to
   the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate
   rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.































De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 20]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


8.  IANA considerations

   IANA is requested to assign an OID xxx under mib-2.
















































De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 21]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


9.  Acknowledgements

   This document reuses some of the work done in earlier RADIUS MIB
   specifications [RFC2618] and [RFC2620].

   The authors would also like to acknowledge the following people for
   their comments to this document: Anjaneyulu Pata, Dan Romascanu, and
   Bert Wijnen.











































De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 22]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


10.  References

10.1  Normative References

   [DYNCLNT]  De Cnodder, S., Jonnala, N., and M. Chiba, "RADIUS Dynamic
              Authorization Client MIB",
              draft-decnodder-radext-dynauth-client-mib-01.txt, work in
              progress, June 2004.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC2578]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
              Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management
              Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578,
              April 1999.

   [RFC2579]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
              Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for
              SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.

   [RFC2580]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
              Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for
              SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.

   [RFC3576]  Chiba, M., Dommety, G., Eklund, M., Mitton, D., and B.
              Aboba, "Dynamic Authorization Extensions to Remote
              Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 3576,
              July 2003.

10.2  Informative References

   [RFC2618]  Aboba, B. and G. Zorn, "RADIUS Authentication Client MIB",
              RFC 2618, June 1999.

   [RFC2619]  Zorn, G. and B. Aboba, "RADIUS Authentication Server MIB",
              RFC 2619, June 1999.

   [RFC2620]  Aboba, B. and G. Zorn, "RADIUS Accounting Client MIB",
              RFC 2620, June 1999.

   [RFC2621]  Zorn, G. and B. Aboba, "RADIUS Accounting Server MIB",
              RFC 2621, June 1999.

   [RFC3410]  Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart,
              "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet
              Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002.




De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 23]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


Authors' Addresses

   Stefaan De Cnodder
   Alcatel
   Francis Wellesplein 1
   B-2018 Antwerp
   Belgium

   Phone: +32 3 240 85 15
   Email: stefaan.de_cnodder@alcatel.be


   Nagi Reddy Jonnala
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   Divyasree Chambers,  B Wing, O'Shaugnessy Road
   Bangalore-560027, India

   Phone: +91 98456 99445
   Email: njonnala@cisco.com


   Murtaza Chiba
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   170 West Tasman Dr.
   San Jose CA, 95134

   Phone: +1 408 525 7198
   Email: mchiba@cisco.com























De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 24]


Internet-Draft      Dynamic Authorization Server MIB           July 2005


Intellectual Property Statement

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.


Disclaimer of Validity

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  This document is subject
   to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
   except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.


Acknowledgment

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.




De Cnodder, et al.       Expires January 8, 2006               [Page 25]