Networking Working Group J. Martocci, Ed.
Internet-Draft Johnson Controls Inc.
Intended status: Informational Pieter De Mil
Expires: April 29, 2009 Ghent University IBCN
W. Vermeylen
Arts Centre Vooruit
Nicolas Riou
Schneider Electric
October 29, 2008
Building Automation Routing Requirements in Low Power and Lossy
Networks
draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs-01
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that
any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is
aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she
becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of
BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 29, 2009.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
Abstract
Martocci Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
The Routing Over Low power and Lossy network (ROLL) Working Group has
been chartered to work on routing solutions for Low Power and Lossy
networks (LLN) in various markets: Industrial, Commercial (Building),
Home and Urban. Pursuant to this effort, this document defines the
routing requirements for building automation.
Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119.
Table of Contents
1. Terminology....................................................4
2. Introduction...................................................4
2.1. Facility Management System (FMS) Topology.................5
2.1.1. Introduction.........................................5
2.1.2. Sensors/Actuators....................................6
2.1.3. Area Controllers.....................................6
2.1.4. Zone Controllers.....................................6
2.2. Installation Methods......................................7
2.2.1. Wired Communication Media............................7
2.2.2. Device Density.......................................7
2.2.3. Installation Procedure...............................9
3. Building Automation Applications...............................9
3.1. Locking and Unlocking the Building.......................10
3.2. Building Energy Conservation.............................10
3.3. Inventory and Remote Diagnosis of Safety Equipment.......10
3.4. Life Cycle of Field Devices..............................11
3.5. Surveillance.............................................11
3.6. Emergency................................................11
3.7. Public Address...........................................12
4. Building Automation Routing Requirements......................12
4.1. Installation.............................................12
4.1.1. Zero-Configuration installation.....................13
4.1.2. Sleeping devices....................................13
4.1.3. Local Testing.......................................13
4.1.4. Device Replacement..................................13
4.2. Scalability..............................................14
4.2.1. Network Domain......................................14
4.2.2. Peer-to-peer Communication..........................14
4.3. Mobility.................................................14
4.3.1. Mobile Device Association...........................15
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
4.4. Resource Constrained Devices.............................15
4.4.1. Limited Processing Power Sensors/Actuators..........15
4.4.2. Limited Processing Power Controllers................15
4.5. Addressing...............................................15
4.5.1. Unicast/Multicast/Anycast...........................16
4.6. Manageability............................................16
4.6.1. Firmware Upgrades...................................16
4.6.2. Diagnostics.........................................16
4.6.3. Route Tracking......................................16
4.7. Compatibility............................................16
4.7.1. IPv4 Compatibility..................................17
4.7.2. Maximum Packet Size.................................17
4.8. Route Selection..........................................17
4.8.1. Path Cost...........................................17
4.8.2. Path Adaptation.....................................17
4.8.3. Route Redundancy....................................17
4.8.4. Route Discovery Time................................17
4.8.5. Route Preference....................................18
4.8.6. Path Symmetry.......................................18
4.8.7. Path Persistence....................................18
5. Traffic Pattern...............................................18
6. Open issues...................................................19
7. Security Considerations.......................................19
8. IANA Considerations...........................................19
9. Acknowledgments...............................................19
10. References...................................................19
10.1. Normative References....................................19
10.2. Informative References..................................20
11. Appendix A: Additional Building Requirements.................20
11.1. Additional Commercial Product Requirements..............20
11.1.1. Wired and Wireless Implementations.................20
11.1.2. World-wide Applicability...........................20
11.1.3. Support of the BACnet Building Protocol............20
11.1.4. Support of the LON Building Protocol...............20
11.1.5. Energy Harvested Sensors...........................21
11.1.6. Communication Distance.............................21
11.1.7. Automatic Gain Control.............................21
11.1.8. Cost...............................................21
11.2. Additional Installation and Commissioning Requirements..21
11.2.1. Device Setup Time..................................21
11.2.2. Unavailability of an IT network....................21
11.3. Additional Network Requirements.........................21
11.3.1. TCP/UDP............................................21
11.3.2. Data Rate Performance..............................22
11.3.3. High Speed Downloads...............................22
11.3.4. Interference Mitigation............................22
11.3.5. Real-time Performance Measures.....................22
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
11.3.6. Packet Reliability.................................22
11.3.7. Merging Commissioned Islands.......................22
11.3.8. Adjustable System Table Sizes......................23
11.4. Prioritized Routing.....................................23
11.4.1. Packet Prioritization..............................23
11.5. Constrained Devices.....................................23
11.5.1. Proxying for Constrained Devices...................23
11.6. Reliability.............................................23
11.6.1. Device Integrity...................................23
Disclaimer of Validity...........................................26
1. Terminology
For description of the terminology used in this specification, please
see the Terminology ID referenced in Section 10.1.
2. Introduction
Commercial buildings have been fitted with pneumatic and subsequently
electronic communication pathways connecting sensors to their
controllers for over one hundred years. Recent economic and
technical advances in wireless communication allow facilities to
increasingly utilize a wireless solution in lieu of a wired solution;
thereby reducing installation costs while maintaining highly reliant
communication. Wireless solutions will be adapted from their
existing wired counterparts in many of the building applications
including, but not limited to Heating, Ventilation, and Air
Conditioning (HVAC), Lighting, Physical Security, Fire, and Elevator
systems. These devices will be developed to reduce installation
costs; while increasing installation and retrofit flexibility.
Sensing devices may be battery or mains powered. Actuators and area
controllers will be mains powered.
Facility Management Systems (FMS) are deployed in a large set of
vertical markets including universities; hospitals; government
facilities; Kindergarten through High School (K-12); pharmaceutical
manufacturing facilities; and single-tenant or multi-tenant office
buildings. These buildings range in size from 100K sqft structures (5
story office buildings), to 1M sqft skyscrapers (100 story
skyscrapers) to complex government facilities such as the Pentagon.
The described topology is meant to be the model to be used in all
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
these types of environments, but clearly must be tailored to the
building class, building tenant and vertical market being served.
The following sections describe the sensor, actuator, area controller
and zone controller layers of the topology. (NOTE: The Building
Controller and Enterprise layers of the FMS are excluded from this
discussion since they typically deal in communication rates requiring
WLAN communication technologies).
2.1. Facility Management System (FMS) Topology
2.1.1. Introduction
To understand the network systems requirements of a facility
management system in a commercial building, this document uses a
framework to describe the basic functions and composition of the
system. An FMS is a horizontally layered system of sensors,
actuators, controllers and user interface devices. Additionally, an
FMS may also be divided vertically across alike, but different
building subsystems such as HVAC, Fire, Security, Lighting, Shutters
and Elevator control systems as denoted in Figure 1.
Much of the makeup of an FMS is optional and installed at the behest
of the customer. Sensors and actuators have no standalone
functionality. All other devices support partial or complete
standalone functionality. These devices can optionally be tethered
to form a more cohesive system. The customer requirements dictate
the level of integration within the facility. This architecture
provides excellent fault tolerance since each node is designed to
operate in an independent mode if the higher layers are unavailable.
+------+ +-----+ +------+ +------+ +------+ +------+
Bldg App'ns | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Building Cntl | | | | | S | | L | | S | | E |
| | | | | E | | I | | H | | L |
Area Control | H | | F | | C | | G | | U | | E |
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
| V | | I | | U | | H | | T | | V |
Zone Control | A | | R | | R | | T | | T | | A |
| C | | E | | I | | I | | E | | T |
Actuators | | | | | T | | N | | R | | O |
| | | | | Y | | G | | S | | R |
Sensors | | | | | | | | | | | |
+------+ +-----+ +------+ +------+ +------+ +------+
Figure 1: Building Systems and Devices
2.1.2. Sensors/Actuators
As Figure 1 indicates an FMS may be composed of many functional
stacks or silos that are interoperably woven together via Building
Applications. Each silo has an array of sensors that monitor the
environment and actuators that effect the environment as determined
by the upper layers of the FMS topology. The sensors typically are
the leaves of the network tree structure providing environmental data
into the system. The actuators are the sensors counterparts
modifying the characteristics of the system based on the input sensor
data and the applications deployed.
2.1.3. Area Controllers
An area describes a small physical locale within a building,
typically a room. HVAC (temperature and humidity) and Lighting (room
lighting, shades, solar loads) vendors oft times deploy area
controllers. Area controls are fed by sensor inputs that monitor the
environmental conditions within the room. Common sensors found in
many rooms that feed the area controllers include temperature,
occupancy, lighting load, solar load and relative humidity. Sensors
found in specialized rooms (such as chemistry labs) might include air
flow, pressure, CO2 and CO particle sensors. Room actuation includes
temperature setpoint, lights and blinds/curtains.
2.1.4. Zone Controllers
Zone Control supports a similar set of characteristics as the Area
Control albeit to an extended space. A zone is normally a logical
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
grouping or functional division of a commercial building. A zone may
also coincidentally map to a physical locale such as a floor.
Zone Control may have direct sensor inputs (smoke detectors for
fire), controller inputs (room controllers for air-handlers in HVAC)
or both (door controllers and tamper sensors for security). Like
area/room controllers, zone controllers are standalone devices that
operate independently or may be attached to the larger network for
more synergistic control.
2.2. Installation Methods
2.2.1. Wired Communication Media
Commercial controllers are traditionally deployed in a facility using
twisted pair serial media following the EIA-485 electrical standard
operating nominally at 38400 to 76800 baud. This allows runs to 5000
ft without a repeater. With the maximum of three repeaters, a single
communication trunk can serpentine 15000 ft. EIA-485 is a multi-drop
media allowing upwards to 255 devices to be connected to a single
trunk.
Most sensors and virtually all actuators currently used in
commercial buildings are "dumb", non-communicating hardwired devices.
However, sensor buses are beginning to be deployed by vendors which
are used for smart sensors and point multiplexing. The Fire
industry deploys addressable fire devices, which usually use some
form of proprietary communication wiring driven by fire codes.
2.2.2. Device Density
Device density differs depending on the application and as dictated
by the local building code requirements. The following sections
detail typical installation densities for different applications.
2.2.2.1. HVAC Device Density
HVAC room applications typically have sensors/actuators and
controllers spaced about 50ft apart. In most cases there is a 3:1
ratio of sensors/actuators to controllers. That is, for each room
there is an installed temperature sensor, flow sensor and damper
actuator for the associated room controller.
HVAC equipment room applications are quite different. An air handler
system may have a single controller with upwards to 25 sensors and
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
actuators within 50 ft of the air handler. A chiller or boiler is
also controlled with a single equipment controller instrumented with
25 sensors and actuators. Each of these devices would be
individually addressed since the devices are mandated or optional as
defined by the specified HVAC application. Air handlers typically
serve one or two floors of the building. Chillers and boilers may be
installed per floor, but many times service a wing, building or the
entire complex via a central plant.
These numbers are typical. In special cases, such as clean rooms,
operating rooms, pharmaceuticals and labs, the ratio of sensors to
controllers can increase by a factor of three. Tenant installations
such as malls would opt for packaged units where much of the sensing
and actuation is integrated into the unit. Here a single device
address would serve the entire unit.
2.2.2.2. Fire Device Density
Fire systems are much more uniformly installed with smoke detectors
installed about every 50 feet. This is dictated by local building
codes. Fire pull boxes are installed uniformly about every 150 feet.
A fire controller will service a floor or wing. The fireman's fire
panel will service the entire building and typically is installed in
the atrium.
2.2.2.3. Lighting Device Density
Lighting is also very uniformly installed with ballasts installed
approximately every 10 feet. A lighting panel typically serves 48 to
64 zones. Wired systems typically tether many lights together into a
single zone. Wireless systems configure each fixture independently
to increase flexibility and reduce installation costs.
2.2.2.4. Physical Security Device Density
Security systems are non-uniformly oriented with heavy density near
doors and windows and lighter density in the building interior space.
The recent influx of interior and perimeter camera systems is
increasing the security footprint. These cameras are atypical
endpoints requiring upwards to 1 megabit/second (Mbit/s) data rates
per camera as contrasted by the few Kbits/s needed by most other FMS
sensing equipment. Previously, camera systems had been deployed on
proprietary wired high speed network. More recent implementations
utilize wired or wireless IP cameras integrated to the enterprise
LAN.
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
2.2.3. Installation Procedure
Wired FMS installation is a multifaceted procedure depending on the
extent of the system and the software interoperability requirement.
However, at the sensor/actuator and controller level, the procedure
is typically a two or three step process.
Most FMS equipment is 24 VAC equipment that can be installed by a
low-voltage electrician. He/she arrives on-site during the
construction of the building prior to the sheet wall and ceiling
installation. This allows him/her to allocate wall space, easily
land the equipment and run the wired controller and sensor networks.
The Building Controllers and Enterprise network are not normally
installed until months later. The electrician completes his task by
running a wire verification procedure that shows proper continuity
between the devices and proper local operation of the devices.
Later in the installation cycle, the higher order controllers are
installed, programmed and commissioned together with the previously
installed sensors, actuators and controllers. In most cases the IP
network is still not operable. The Building Controllers are
completely commissioned using a crossover cable or a temporary IP
switch together with static IP addresses.
Once the IP network is operational, the FMS may optionally be added
to the enterprise network. The wireless installation process must
follow the same work flow. The electrician will install the products
as before and run local functional tests between the wireless devices
to assure operation before leaving the job. The electrician does
not carry a laptop so the commissioning must be built into the device
operation.
3. Building Automation Applications
Vooruit is an arts centre in a restored monument which dates from
1913. This complex monument consists of over 350 different rooms
including a meeting rooms, large public halls and theaters serving as
many as 2500 guests. A number of use cases regarding Vooruit are
described in the following text. The situations and needs described
in these use cases can also be found in all automated large
buildings, such as airports and hospitals.
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
3.1. Locking and Unlocking the Building
The member of the cleaning staff arrives first in the morning
unlocking the building (or a part of it) from the control room. This
means that several doors are unlocked; the alarms are switched off;
the heating turns on; some lights switch on, etc. Similarly, the
last person leaving the building has to lock the building. This will
lock all the outer doors, turn the alarms on, switch off heating and
lights, etc.
The ''building locked'' or ''building unlocked'' event needs to be
delivered to a subset of all the sensors and actuators. It can be
beneficial if those field devices form a group (e.g. ''all-sensors-
actuators-interested-in-lock/unlock-events). Alternatively, the area
and zone controllers could form a group where the arrival of such an
event results in each area and zone controller initiating unicast or
multicast within the LLN.
This use case is also described in the home automation, although the
requirement about preventing the "popcorn effect" draft [I-D.ietf-
roll-home-routing-reqs] can be relaxed a little bit in building
automation. It would be nice if lights, roll-down shutters and other
actuators in the same room or area with transparent walls execute the
command around (not 'at') the same time (a tolerance of 200 ms is
allowed).
3.2. Building Energy Conservation
A room that is not in use should not be heated, air conditioned or
ventilated and the lighting should be turned off. In a building with
a lot of rooms it can happen quite frequently that someone forgets to
switch off the HVAC and lighting. This is a real waste of valuable
energy. To prevent this from happening, the janitor can program the
building according to the day's schedule. This way lighting and HVAC
is turned on prior to the use of a room, and turned off afterwards.
Using such a system Vooruit has realized a saving of 35% on the gas
and electricity bills.
3.3. Inventory and Remote Diagnosis of Safety Equipment
Each month Vooruit is obliged to make an inventory of its safety
equipment. This task takes two working days. Each fire extinguisher
(100), fire blanket (10), fire-resistant door (120) and evacuation
plan (80) must be checked for presence and proper operation. Also
the battery and lamp of every safety lamp must be checked before each
public event (safety laws). Automating this process using asset
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
tracking and low-power wireless technologies would heavily cut into
working hours.
It is important that these messages are delivered very reliably and
that the power consumption of the sensors/actuators attached to this
safety equipment is kept at a very low level.
3.4. Life Cycle of Field Devices
Some field devices (e.g. smoke detectors) must be replaced
periodically. Devices must be easily added and deleted from the
network to support augmenting sensors/actuators during construction.
A secure mechanism is needed to remove the old device and install the
new device. New devices need to be authenticated before they can
participate in the routing process of the LLN. After the
authentication, zero-configuration of the routing protocol is
necessary.
3.5. Surveillance
Ingress and egress are real-time applications needing response times
below 500msec. Each door must support local programming to restrict
use on a per person basis with respect to time-of-day and person
entering. While much of the application is localized at the door,
tamper, door ajar, forced entry must be routed to one or more fixed
or mobile user devices within 5 seconds.
3.6. Emergency
In case of an emergency it is very important that all the visitors be
evacuated as quickly as possible. The fire and smoke detectors have
to set off an alarm, and alert the mobile personnel on their user
device (e.g. PDA). All emergency exits have to be instantly unlocked
and the emergency lighting has to guide the visitors to these exits.
The necessary sprinklers have to be activated and the electricity
grid has to be monitored if it becomes necessary to shut down some
parts of the building. Emergency services have to be notified
instantly.
A wireless system could bring in some extra safety features.
Locating fire fighters and guiding them through the building could be
a life-saving application.
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
These life critical applications must take routing precedence over
other network traffic. Commands entered during these emergencies
must be properly authenticated by device, user, and command request.
3.7. Public Address
It should be possible to send audio and text messages to the visitors
in the building. These messages can be very diverse, e.g. ASCII text
boards displaying the name of the event in a room, audio
announcements such as delays in the program, lost and found children,
evacuation orders, etc.
The control network must be able to readily sense the audience in an
area and deliver applicable message content.
4. Building Automation Routing Requirements
Following are the building automation routing requirements for a
network used to integrate building sensor actuator and control
products. These requirements have been limited to routing
requirements only. These requirements are written not presuming any
preordained network topology, physical media (wired) or radio
technology (wireless). See Appendix A for additional requirements
that have been deemed outside the scope of this document yet will
pertain to the successful deployment of building automation systems.
4.1. Installation
Building control systems typically are installed and tested by
electricians having little computer knowledge and no network
knowledge whatsoever. These systems are often installed during the
building construction phase before the drywall and ceilings are in
place. There is never an IP network in place during this
installation.
In retrofit applications, pulling wires from sensors to controllers
can be costly and in some applications (e.g. museums) not feasible.
Local (ad hoc) testing of sensors and room controllers must be
completed before the tradesperson can complete his/her work. System
level commissioning will later be deployed using a more computer
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
savvy person with access to a commissioning device (e.g. a laptop
computer). The completely installed and commissioned IP network may
or may not be in place at this time. Following are the installation
routing requirements.
4.1.1. Zero-Configuration installation
It MUST be possible to fully commission network devices without
requiring any additional commissioning device (e.g. laptop). The
device MAY support up to sixteen integrated switches to uniquely
identify the device on the network.
4.1.2. Sleeping devices
Sensing devices must be able to utilize battery power or Energy
Harvesting techniques for power. This presumes a need for devices
that most often sleep. Routing must support these catatonic devices
to assure that established routes do not utilize sleeping devices.
It must also define routing rules when these devices need to access
the network. Communication to these devices must be bidirectional.
Routing must support proxies that can cache the inbound data for the
sleeping device until the device awakens. Routing must understand
the selected proxy for the sleeping device.
Batteries must be operational for at least 5 years when the sensing
device is transmitting its data (e.g. 64 bytes) once per minute.
This requires that sleeping devices must have minimal network access
time when they awake and transmit onto the network.
4.1.3. Local Testing
The local sensors and requisite actuators and controllers must be
testable within the locale (e.g. room) to assure communication
connectivity and local operation without requiring other systemic
devices. Routing must allow for temporary ad hoc paths to be
established that are updated as the network physically and
functionally expands.
4.1.4. Device Replacement
Replacement devices must be plug-and-play with no additional setup
compared to what is normally required for a new device. Devices
referencing data in the replaced device MUST not need to be
reconfigured to the new device.
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
4.2. Scalability
Building control systems are designed for facilities from 50000 sq.
ft. to 1M+ sq. ft. The networks that support these systems must
cost-effectively scale accordingly. In larger facilities
installation may occur simultaneously on various wings or floors, yet
the end system must seamlessly merge. Following are the scalability
requirements.
4.2.1. Network Domain
The routing protocol MUST be able to support networks with at least
1000 routers and 1000 hosts. Subnetworks (e.g. rooms, primary
equipment) within the network must support upwards to 255 sensors
and/or actuators.
.
4.2.2. Peer-to-peer Communication
The data domain for commercial FMS systems may sprawl across a vast
portion of the physical domain. For example, a chiller may reside in
the facility's basement due to its size, yet the associated cooling
towers will reside on the roof. The cold-water supply and return
pipes serpentine through all the intervening floors. The feedback
control loops for these systems require data from across the
facility.
Network devices must be able to communicate in a peer-to-peer manner
with all other devices on the network. Thus the routing protocol MUST
provide routes to any other devices without being subject to a
constrained path via a gating device.
4.3. Mobility
Most devices are affixed to walls or installed on ceilings within
buildings. Hence the mobility requirements for commercial buildings
are few. However, in wireless environments location tracking of
occupants and assets is gaining favor.
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
4.3.1. Mobile Device Association
Mobile devices SHOULD be capable of unjoining (handing-off) from an
old network joining onto a new network within 15 seconds.
4.4. Resource Constrained Devices
Sensing and actuator device processing power and memory may be 4
orders of magnitude less (i.e. 10,000x) than many more traditional
client devices on an IP network. The routing mechanisms must
therefore be tailored to fit these resource constrained devices.
4.4.1. Limited Processing Power Sensors/Actuators
The software stack requirements for sensors and actuators MUST be
implementable in 8-bit devices with no more than 128KB of flash
memory (including at least 32KB for the application code) and no more
than 8KB of RAM (including at least 1KB RAM available for the
application).
4.4.2. Limited Processing Power Controllers
The software stack requirements for room controllers SHOULD be
implementable in 8-bit devices with no more than 256KB of flash
memory (including at least 32KB for the application code) and no more
than 8KB of RAM (including at least 1KB RAM available for the
application)
4.5. Addressing
Facility Management systems require different communication schema to
solicit or post network information. Broadcasts or anycasts need be
used to resolve unresolved references within a device when the device
first joins the network.
As with any network communication, broadcasting should be minimized.
This is especially a problem for small embedded devices with limited
network bandwidth. In many cases a global broadcast could be
replaced with a multicast since the application knows the application
domain. Broadcasts and multicasts are typically used for network
joins and application binding in embedded systems.
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
4.5.1. Unicast/Multicast/Anycast
Routing MUST support anycast, unicast, multicast and broadcast
services (or IPv6 equivalent).
4.6. Manageability
In addition to the initial installation of the system (see Section
4.1), it is equally important for the ongoing maintenance of the
system to be simple and inexpensive.
4.6.1. Firmware Upgrades
To support high speed code downloads, routing MUST support parallel
downloads to targeted devices yet guarantee packet delivery.
4.6.2. Diagnostics
To improve diagnostics, the network layer SHOULD be able to be placed
in and out of 'verbose' mode. Verbose mode is a temporary debugging
mode that provides additional communication information including at
least total number of packets sent, packets received, number of
failed communication attempts, neighbor table and routing table
entries.
4.6.3. Route Tracking
Route diagnostics SHOULD be supported providing information such as
path quality; number of hops; available alternate active paths with
associated costs.
4.7. Compatibility
The building automation industry adheres to application layer
protocol standards to achieve vendor interoperability. These
standards are BACnet and LON. It is estimated that fully 80% of the
customer bid requests received world-wide will require compliance to
one or both of these standards. ROLL routing will therefore need to
dovetail to these application protocols to assure acceptance in the
building automation industry. These protocols have been in place for
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
over 10 years. Many sites will require backwards compatibility with
the existing legacy devices.
4.7.1. IPv4 Compatibility
The routing protocol MUST define a communication scheme to assure
compatibility of IPv4 and IPv6 devices.
4.7.2. Maximum Packet Size
Routing MUST support packet sizes to 1526 octets (to be backwards
compatible with 802.3 subnetworks)
4.8. Route Selection
Route selection determines reliability and quality of the
communication paths among the devices. Optimizing the routes over
time resolve any nuances developed at system startup when nodes are
asynchronously adding themselves to the network. Path adaptation
will reduce latency if the path costs consider hop count as a cost
attribute.
4.8.1. Path Cost
The routing protocol MUST support a range of metrics and optimize
(constrained) path according to these metrics. These metrics SHOULD
include signal strength, available bandwidth, hop count and
communication error rates.
4.8.2. Path Adaptation
Communication paths MUST adapt toward the chosen metric(s) (e.g.
signal quality) optimality in time.
4.8.3. Route Redundancy
To reduce real-time latency, the network layer SHOULD be configurable
to allow secondary and tertiary paths to be established and used upon
failure of the primary path.
4.8.4. Route Discovery Time
Route discovery occurring during packet transmission MUST not exceed
120 msecs.
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
4.8.5. Route Preference
The route discovery mechanism SHOULD allow a source node (sensor) to
dictate a configured destination node (controller) as a preferred
routing path.
4.8.6. Path Symmetry
The network layer SHOULD support both asymmetric and symmetric routes
as requested by the application layer. When the application layer
selects asymmetry the network layer MAY elect to find either
asymmetric or symmetric routes. When the application layer requests
symmetric routes, then only symmetric routes MUST be utilized.
4.8.7. Path Persistence
To eliminate high network traffic in power-fail or brown-out
conditions previously established routes SHOULD be remembered and
invoked prior to establishing new routes for those devices reentering
the network.
5. Traffic Pattern
The independent nature of the automation systems within a building
plays heavy onto the network traffic patterns. Much of the real-time
sensor data stays within the local environment. Alarming and other
event data will percolate to higher layers.
Systemic data may be either polled or event based. Polled data
systems will generate a uniform packet load on the network. This
architecture has proven not scalable. Most vendors have developed
event based systems which passes data on event. These systems are
highly scalable and generate low data on the network at quiescence.
Unfortunately, the systems will generate a heavy load on startup
since all the initial data must migrate to the controller level.
They also will generate a temporary but heavy load during firmware
upgrades. This latter load can normally be mitigated by performing
these downloads during off-peak hours.
Devices will need to reference peers occasionally for sensor data or
to coordinate across systems. Normally, though, data will migrate
from the sensor level upwards through the local, area then
supervisory level. Bottlenecks will typically form at the funnel
point from the area controllers to the supervisory controllers.
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
6. Open issues
Other items to be addressed in further revisions of this document
include:
All known open items completed
7. Security Considerations
Security policies, especially wireless encryption and overall device
authentication need to be considered. These issues are out of scope
for the routing requirements, but could have an impact on the
processing capabilities of the sensors and controllers.
As noted above, the FMS systems are typically highly configurable in
the field and hence the security policy is most often dictated by the
type of building to which the FMS is being installed.
8. IANA Considerations
This document includes no request to IANA.
9. Acknowledgments
J. P. Vasseur, Ted Humpal and Zach Shelby are gratefully acknowledged
for their contributions to this document.
This document was prepared using 2-Word-v2.0.template.dot.
10. References
10.1. Normative References
draft-ietf-roll-home-routing-reqs-03
draft-ietf-roll-terminology-00.txt
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
10.2. Informative References
''RS-485 EIA Standard: Standard for Electrical Characteristics of
Generators and Receivers for use in Balanced Digital Multipoint
Systems'', April 1983
''BACnet: A Data Communication Protocol for Building and Automation
Control Networks'' ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 135-2004'', 2004
''LON: OPEN DATA COMMUNICATION IN BUILDING AUTOMATION, CONTROLS AND
BUILDING MANAGEMENT - BUILDING NETWORK PROTOCOL - PART 1: PROTOCOL
STACK'', 11/25/2005
11. Appendix A: Additional Building Requirements
Appendix A contains additional building requirements that were deemed
out of scope for the routing document yet provided ancillary
informational substance to the reader. The requirements will need to
be addressed by ROLL or other WGs before adoption by the building
automation industry will be considered.
11.1. Additional Commercial Product Requirements
11.1.1. Wired and Wireless Implementations
Solutions MUST support both wired and wireless implementations.
11.1.2. World-wide Applicability
Wireless devices MUST be supportable at the 2.4Ghz ISM band.
Wireless devices SHOULD be supportable at the 900 and 868 ISM bands
as well.
11.1.3. Support of the BACnet Building Protocol
Devices implementing the ROLL features MUST be able to support the
BACnet protocol.
11.1.4. Support of the LON Building Protocol
Devices implementing the ROLL features MUST be able to support the
LON protocol.
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
11.1.5. Energy Harvested Sensors
RFDs SHOULD target for operation using viable energy harvesting
techniques such as ambient light, mechanical action, solar load, air
pressure and differential temperature.
11.1.6. Communication Distance
A source device may be upwards to 1000 feet from its destination.
Communication MUST be established between these devices without
needing to install other intermediate 'communication only' devices
such as repeaters
11.1.7. Automatic Gain Control
For wireless implementations, the device radios SHOULD incorporate
automatic transmit power regulation to maximize packet transfer and
minimize network interference regardless of network size or density.
11.1.8. Cost
The total installed infrastructure cost including but not limited to
the media, required infrastructure devices (amortized across the
number of devices); labor to install and commission the network MUST
not exceed $1.00/foot for wired implementations.
Wireless implementations (total installed cost) must cost no more
than 80% of wired implementations.
11.2. Additional Installation and Commissioning Requirements
11.2.1. Device Setup Time
Network setup by the installer MUST take no longer than 20 seconds
per device installed.
11.2.2. Unavailability of an IT network
Product commissioning MUST be performed by an application engineer
prior to the installation of the IT network.
11.3. Additional Network Requirements
11.3.1. TCP/UDP
Connection based and connectionless services MUST be supported
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
11.3.2. Data Rate Performance
An effective data rate of 20kbits/s is the lowest acceptable
operational data rate acceptable on the network.
11.3.3. High Speed Downloads
Devices receiving a download MAY cease normal operation, but upon
completion of the download MUST automatically resume normal
operation.
11.3.4. Interference Mitigation
The network MUST automatically detect interference and migrate the
network to a better 802.15.4 channel to improve communication.
Channel changes and nodes response to the channel change MUST occur
within 60 seconds.
11.3.5. Real-time Performance Measures
A node transmitting a 'request with expected reply' to another node
MUST send the message to the destination and receive the response in
not more than 120 msec. This response time SHOULD be achievable with
5 or less hops in each direction. This requirement assumes network
quiescence and a negligible turnaround time at the destination node.
11.3.6. Packet Reliability
Reliability MUST meet the following minimum criteria :
< 1% MAC layer errors on all messages; After no more than three
retries
< .1% Network layer errors on all messages;
After no more than three additional retries;
< 0.01% Application layer errors on all messages.
Therefore application layer messages will fail no more than once
every 100,000 messages.
11.3.7. Merging Commissioned Islands
Subsystems are commissioned by various vendors at various times
during building construction. These subnetworks MUST seamlessly
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
merge into networks and networks MUST seamlessly merge into
internetworks since the end user wants a holistic view of the system.
11.3.8. Adjustable System Table Sizes
Routing MUST support adjustable router table entry sizes on a per
node basis to maximize limited RAM in the devices.
11.4. Prioritized Routing
Network and application routing prioritization is required to assure
that mission critical applications (e.g. Fire Detection) cannot be
deferred while less critical application access the network.
11.4.1. Packet Prioritization
Routers MUST support quality of service prioritization to assure
timely response for critical FMS packets.
11.5. Constrained Devices
The network may be composed of a heterogeneous mix of full, battery
and energy harvested devices. The routing protocol must support
these constrained devices.
11.5.1. Proxying for Constrained Devices
Routing MUST support in-bound packet caches for low-power (battery
and energy harvested) devices when these devices are not accessible
on the network.
These devices MUST have a designated powered proxying device to which
packets will be temporarily routed and cached until the constrained
device accesses the network.
11.6. Reliability
11.6.1. Device Integrity
Commercial Building devices MUST all be periodically scanned to
assure that the device is viable and can communicate data and alarm
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
information as needed. Network routers SHOULD maintain previous
packet flow information temporally to minimize overall network
overhead.
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
Authors' Addresses
Jerry Martocci
Johnson Control
507 E. Michigan Street
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53202
USA
Phone: 414.524.4010
Email: jerald.p.martocci@jci.com
Nicolas Riou
Schneider Electric
Technopole 38TEC T3
37 quai Paul Louis Merlin
38050 Grenoble Cedex 9
France
Phone: +33 4 76 57 66 15
Email: nicolas.riou@fr.schneider-electric.com
Pieter De Mil
Ghent University - IBCN
G. Crommenlaan 8 bus 201
Ghent 9050
Belgium
Phone: +32-9331-4981
Fax: +32--9331--4899
Email: pieter.demil@intec.ugent.be
Wouter Vermeylen
Arts Centre Vooruit
???
Ghent 9000
Belgium
Phone: ???
Fax: ???
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
Email: wouter@vooruit.be
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs October 2008
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Martocci,(et al) Expires April 29, 2009 [Page 27]