SIPPING Working Group G. Camarillo
Internet-Draft Ericsson
Expires: April 13, 2005 A. Roach
Estacado Systems
O. Levin
Microsoft Corporation
October 13, 2004
Subscriptions to Request-Contained Resource Lists in the Session
Initiation Protocol (SIP)
draft-ietf-sipping-uri-list-subscribe-01.txt
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is subject to all provisions
of section 3 of RFC 3667. By submitting this Internet-Draft, each
author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of
which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of
which he or she become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
RFC 3668.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as
Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 13, 2005.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).
Abstract
This document specifies a way to create subscription to a list of
resources in SIP. This is achieved by including the list of
resources in the body of a SUBSCRIBE. Instead of having a subscriber
Camarillo, et al. Expires April 13, 2005 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft SUBSCRIBE-Contained Lists October 2004
send a SUBSCRIBE for each resource individually, the subscriber
defines the resource list, subscribes to it, and gets notifications
about changes in the resources' state using a single SUBSCRIBE
dialog.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Providing a Resource List Server with a URI-List . . . . . . . 3
4. URI-List Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. Resource List Server Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. Providing a URI to Manipulate a Resource List . . . . . . . . 4
7. Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
10. Acknowledges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
11.1 Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
11.2 Informational References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . 9
Camarillo, et al. Expires April 13, 2005 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft SUBSCRIBE-Contained Lists October 2004
1. Introduction
RFC xxxx [4] specifies how to establish subscriptions to a
homogeneous resource list in SIP [2] and defines the procedures for
getting notifications about changes in the state of the associated
resources. Yet, list creation is outside the scope of [4].
This document specifies a way to create a list with a set of
resources and subscribe to it using a single SIP request. This is
achieved by including the list of resources (as defined in [5]) in
the body of the SUBSCRIBE request.
2. Terminology
In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
"SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT
RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 [1] and indicate requirement levels for
compliant implementations.
3. Providing a Resource List Server with a URI-List
A client that wants to create a resource list and subscribe to it,
using the mechanism described in this document, constructs a
SUBSCRIBE with at least one body, whose disposition is type
"recipient-list" as defined in [5], containing the URI-list. The
client MUST build the remaining of the SUBSCRIBE request following
the rules in RFC 3265 [3].
The client MUST support the "rlmi+xml" format defined in [4] and
signal this by including "rlmi+xml" in the Accept header. The client
MAY support additional formats and include them in the Accept header
field of the SUBSCRIBE.
4. URI-List Format
The [5] mandates that each URI-list services specification, such as
the subscription service defined here, specifies the default format
for the recipient-list bodies used within the particular service.
The default format for the recipient-list bodies for the subscription
service defined in this document is the resource list format defined
in [6]. UAs (User Agents) and resource list servers handling
recipient-list bodies MUST support this format and MAY support other
formats.
The Extensible Markup Language (XML) Configuration Access Protocol
(XCAP) resource list document provides features, such as hierarchical
Camarillo, et al. Expires April 13, 2005 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft SUBSCRIBE-Contained Lists October 2004
lists and the ability to include entries by reference relative to the
XCAP root URI, that are not needed by the subscription service
defined here, which only needs to transfer a flat list of URIs
between a UA and the resource list server. Therefore, when using the
default resource list document, UAs SHOULD use flat lists (i.e., no
hierarchical lists) and SHOULD NOT use <entry-ref> elements.
A resource list server receiving a URI-list with more information
than what has just been described MAY discard all the extra
information.
Figure 1 shows an example of a flat list that follows the resource
list document.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<resource-lists xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:resource-lists"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<list>
<entry uri="sip:bill@example.com" />
<entry uri="sip:joe@example.org" />
<entry uri="sip:ted@example.net" />
</list>
</resource-lists>
Figure 1: URI-List
5. Resource List Server Behavior
On reception of a SUBSCRIBE with a URI-list, a resource list server,
which chooses to accept the "rlmi+xml" format, MUST comply with [4]
for creating the subscription and reporting the changes in the
resources within the created dialog.
Note that the status code in the response to the SUBSCRIBE does not
provide any information about whether or not the resource list server
was able to successfully subscribe to the URIs in the URI-list. The
client obtains this information in the notifications sent by the
server.
6. Providing a URI to Manipulate a Resource List
A client may need to manipulate a resource list at a resource list
server. The resource list server MAY provide a URI to manipulate the
resource list associated with a subscription using the Call-Info
header field in the NOTIFY that establishes the subscription. The
"purpose" parameter of the Call-Info header field MUST have a value
of "list-management", which we register with the IANA in Section 9.
Camarillo, et al. Expires April 13, 2005 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft SUBSCRIBE-Contained Lists October 2004
The following is an example of such a header field.
Call-Info: <http://xcap.example.com/your-list.xml>
;purpose=list-management
The life-time of a resource list to be manipulated by the URI
provided by the server is blundled to the life-time of the
subscription. That is, the resource list SHOULD be destroyed when
the subscription expires or is otherwise terminated.
7. Example
The following is an example of a SUBSCRIBE request, which carries a
URI-list in its body, sent by a UA to a resource list server.
Camarillo, et al. Expires April 13, 2005 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft SUBSCRIBE-Contained Lists October 2004
SUBSCRIBE sip:rls@example.com SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP terminal.example.com;branch=z9hG4bKwYb6QREiCL
Max-Forwards: 70
To: RLS <sip:rls@example.com>
From: <sip:adam@example.com>;tag=ie4hbb8t
Call-ID: cdB34qLToC@terminal.example.com
CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE
Contact: <sip:terminal.example.com>
Event: presence
Expires: 7200
Supported: eventlist
Accept: application/cpim-pidf+xml
Accept: application/rlmi+xml
Accept: multipart/related
Accept: multipart/signed
Accept: multipart/encrypted
Content-Type: application/resource-lists+xml
Content-Disposition: recipient-list
Content-Length: 337
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<resource-lists xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:resource-lists"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<list>
<entry uri="sip:bill@example.com" />
<entry uri="sip:joe@example.org" />
<entry uri="sip:ted@example.net" />
</list>
</resource-lists>
Figure 2: SUBSCRIBE request
8. Security Considerations
The Security Considerations Section of [4] discusses security issues
related to resource list servers. Resource list servers accepting
request-contained URI-lists MUST also follow the security guidelines
given in [4].
The Framework and Security Considerations for SIP URI-List Services
[5] discusses issues related to SIP URI-list services. Given that a
resource list server sending SUBSCRIBEs to a set of users acts as a
URI-list service, implementations of resource list servers that
handle request-contained URI-lists MUST follow the security-related
rules in [5]. These rules include mandatory authentication and
authorization of clients, and opt-in lists.
Camarillo, et al. Expires April 13, 2005 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft SUBSCRIBE-Contained Lists October 2004
9. IANA Considerations
The document defines the "list-management" value for the purpose
parameter of the Call-Info header field. A reference to this RFC
should be added to the purpose Call-Info parameter entry in the SIP
header field parameter registry on:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters
10. Acknowledges
Cullen Jennings and Jonathan Rosenberg provided useful comments on
this document.
11. References
11.1 Normative References
[1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[2] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A.,
Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M. and E. Schooler, "SIP:
Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002.
[3] Roach, A., "Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)-Specific Event
Notification", RFC 3265, June 2002.
[4] Roach, A., Rosenberg, J. and B. Campbell, "A Session Initiation
Protocol (SIP) Event Notification Extension for Resource
Lists", draft-ietf-simple-event-list-05 (work in progress),
August 2004.
[5] Camarillo, G., "Requirements and Framework for Session
Initiation Protocol (SIP)Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)-List
Services", draft-ietf-sipping-uri-services-00 (work in
progress), July 2004.
11.2 Informational References
[6] Rosenberg, J., "Extensible Markup Language (XML) Formats for
Representing Resource Lists",
draft-ietf-simple-xcap-list-usage-03 (work in progress), July
2004.
Camarillo, et al. Expires April 13, 2005 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft SUBSCRIBE-Contained Lists October 2004
Authors' Addresses
Gonzalo Camarillo
Ericsson
Hirsalantie 11
Jorvas 02420
Finland
EMail: Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com
Adam Roach
Estacado Systems
EMail: adam@estacado.net
Orit Levin
Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
EMail: oritl@microsoft.com
Camarillo, et al. Expires April 13, 2005 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft SUBSCRIBE-Contained Lists October 2004
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Camarillo, et al. Expires April 13, 2005 [Page 9]
