A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
Title: User-based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of
the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)
Author(s): U. Blumenthal, B. Wijnen
Status: Standards Track
Date: December 2002
Mailbox: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
See Also: STD 62
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-snmpv3-usm-v2-rfc2574bis-01.txt
This document describes the User-based Security Model (USM) for Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMP) version 3 for use in the SNMP
architecture. It defines the Elements of Procedure for providing SNMP
message level security. This document also includes a Management
Information Base (MIB) for remotely monitoring/managing the
configuration parameters for this Security Model. This document
obsoletes RFC 2574.
This document is a product of the SNMPv3 Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Standard Protocol.
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for
the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the
"Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution
of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG. Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.
Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body
help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
Subject: getting rfcs
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.