Network Working Group Dayong Guo
Internet Draft Sheng Jiang
Intended status: Standards Track Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
Expires: October 20, 2011 R. Despres
RD-IPtech
April 20, 2011
RADIUS Attribute for 6rd
draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-02.txt
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working
documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is
at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 20, 2011.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Guo, Jiang & Despres Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-02 April 2011
Abstract
6rd is One of the most popular methods to provide both IPv4 and IPv6
connectivity services simultaneously during the IPv4/IPv6 co-existing
period. The DHCP 6rd option has been defined to configure 6rd CPE.
But in many networks, the configuration information may be stored in
AAA servers while user configuration is mainly from Broadband Network
Gateway (BNG) through DHC protocol. This document defines a RADIUS
attribute that carries 6rd configuration information from AAA server
to BNG.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ................................................ 3
2. Terminology ................................................. 3
3. IPv6 6rd Configuration with RADIUS........................... 3
4. Attributes .................................................. 5
4.1. IPv6-6rd-Configuration Attribute ....................... 5
4.2. Table of attributes..................................... 7
5. Diameter Considerations...................................... 7
6. Security Considerations...................................... 7
7. IANA Considerations ......................................... 7
8. Acknowledgments ............................................. 8
9. Change Log [RFC Editor please remove] ....................... 8
10. References ................................................. 8
10.1. Normative References................................... 8
10.2. Informative References................................. 9
Guo, Jiang & Despres Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-02 April 2011
1. Introduction
Recently providers start to deploy IPv6 and consider how to transit
to IPv6. 6rd (IPv6 rapid deployment) [RFC5969] is one of the most
popular methods to provide both IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity services
simultaneously during the IPv4/IPv6 co-existing period. 6rd is used
to provide IPv6 connectivity service through legacy IPv4-only
infrastructure. 6rd adopt DHCP as auto-configuring protocol. The 6rd
CPE extends DHCP option to discover 6rd border relay and to configure
IPv6 prefix and address.
In many networks, user configuration information may be managed by
AAA servers, together with user Authentication, Authorization, and
Accounting (AAA). Current AAA servers communicate using the RADIUS
(Remote Authentication Dial In User Service, [RFC2865]) protocol.
In a fixed line broadband network, the Broadband Network Gateways
(BNGs) act as the access gateway of users (hosts or CPEs). The BNGs
are assumed to embed a DHCP server function that allows them to
locally handle any DHCP requests issued by hosts.
Since the 6rd configuration information is stored in AAA servers and
user configuration is mainly through DHC protocol between BNGs and
hosts. New RADIUS attributes are needed to propagate the information
from AAA servers to BNGs.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 [RFC2119].
3. IPv6 6rd Configuration with RADIUS
The below Figure 1 illustrates how the RADIUS protocol and DHCP
cooperate to provide users/hosts with 6rd configuration.
Guo, Jiang & Despres Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-02 April 2011
User/host BNG AAA Server
| | |
|-------DHCPDISCOVER------>| |
| |---Request(6rd Attribute)--->|
| | |
| |<---Accept(6rd Attribute)----|
|<-------DHCPOFFER---------| |
| | |
|--------DHCPREQUEST------>| |
| (6rd Option) | |
|<--------DHCPACK----------| |
| (6rd option) | |
| | |
DHCP RADIUS
Figure 1: the cooperation between DHCP and RADIUS
BNGs act as a bridge between user and AAA server. First, a BNG
receives a user DHCPDISCOVER. It initiates the BNG to request
correspondent user authentication relevant from an AAA server using
RADIUS protocol. A 6rd request may be also sent in the same message.
If the user authentication is approved by the AAA server, an Accept
message is acknowledged with the 6rd Attribute, defined in the next
Section. After the BNG responds to the user with an Advertise
message, the user requests for a 6rd Option. Then, the BNG can reply
the user using DHCP protocol.
Figure 2 describes another scenario, in which the authentication
operation is not coupled with DHCP. In the authentication stage, the
BNG obtains the 6rd configuration information from the AAA server
through RADIUS protocol. When the user requests the 6rd Option, the
BNG replies with a 6rd option in DHCPACK.
User/host BNG AAA Server
| | |
| |---Request(6rd Attribute)--->|
| | |
| |<---Accept(6rd Attribute)----|
| | |
|--------DHCPREQUEST------>| |
| (6rd Option) | |
|<---------DHCPACK---------| |
| (6rd option) | |
| | |
DHCP RADIUS
Figure 2: the cooperation between DHCP and RADIUS
Guo, Jiang & Despres Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-02 April 2011
4. Attributes
This section defines 6rd attribute which is used in the 6rd scenario.
4.1. IPv6-6rd-Configuration Attribute
The IPv6-6rd-Configuration Attribute is structured as follows (The
specification requires that multiple IPv4 addresses are associated
strongly with one IPv6 prefix. Given that RADIUS currently has no
recommended way of grouping multiple attributes, the below design
appears to be a reasonable compromise.):
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | SubType | SubLen |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| IPv4MaskLen | SubType | SubLen | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 6rdPrefixLen | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| |
| 6rdPrefix |
| |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| | SubType | SubLen |6rdBRIPv4Address|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 6rdBRIPv4Address |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
TBD
Length
25 + n*6 (the length of the entire attribute in octets; n
stands the number of BR IPv4 addresses, minimum n is 1).
SubType
1 (SubType number, for the IPv4 Mask Length suboption)
SubLen
Guo, Jiang & Despres Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-02 April 2011
3 (the length of the IPv4 Mask Length suboption)
IPv4MaskLen
The number of high-order bits that are identical across all CE
IPv4 addresses within a given 6rd domain. This may be any value
between 0 and 32. Any value greater than 32 is invalid.
SubType
2 (SubType number, for the 6rd prefix suboption)
SubLen
20 (the length of the 6rd prefix suboption)
Reserved
Set to be all 0 for now. Reserved for the future use. To be
compatible with other IPv6 prefix attributes in the Radius
Protocol.
6rdPrefixLen
The IPv6 Prefix length of the Service Provider's 6rd IPv6
prefix in number of bits. The 6rdPrefixLen MUST be less than or
equal to 128.
6rdPrefix
The Service Provider's 6rd IPv6 prefix represented as a 16
octet IPv6 address. The bits after the 6rdPrefixlen number of
bits in the prefix SHOULD be set to zero.
SubType
3 (SubType number, for the 6rd Border Relay IPv4 address
suboption)
SubLen
6 (the length of the 6rd Border Relay IPv4 address suboption)
6rdBRIPv4Address
Guo, Jiang & Despres Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-02 April 2011
One or more IPv4 addresses of the 6rd Border Relay(s) for a
given 6rd domain. The maximum RADIUS Attribute length of 255
octets results in a limit of 58 IPv4 addresses.
4.2. Table of attributes
The following table provides a guide to which attributes may be found
in which kinds of packets, and in what quantity.
Request Accept Reject Challenge Accounting # Attribute
Request
0-1 0-1 0 0 0-1 TBD IPv6-6rd-
Configuration
The following table defines the meaning of the above table entries.
0 This attribute MUST NOT be present in packet.
0+ Zero or more instances of this attribute MAY be present in
packet.
0-1 Zero or one instance of this attribute MAY be present in
packet.
1 Exactly one instance of this attribute MUST be present in
packet.
5. Diameter Considerations
This attribute is usable within either RADIUS or Diameter [RFC3588].
Since the Attributes defined in this document will be allocated from
the standard RADIUS type space, no special handling is required by
Diameter entities.
6. Security Considerations
In 6rd scenarios, the RADIUS protocol is run over IPv4. Known
security vulnerabilities of the RADIUS protocol are discussed in RFC
2607 [RFC2607], RFC 2865 [RFC2865], and RFC 2869 [RFC2869]. Use of
IPsec [RFC4301] for providing security when RADIUS is carried in IPv6
is discussed in RFC 3162 [RFC3162].
Security considerations for the Diameter protocol are discussed in
RFC 3588 [RFC3588].
7. IANA Considerations
This document requires the assignment of one new RADIUS Attribute
Types in the "Radius Types" registry (currently located at
Guo, Jiang & Despres Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-02 April 2011
http://www.iana.org/assignments/radius-types for the following
attributes:
o IPv6-6rd-Configuration
IANA should allocate the number from the standard RADIUS Attributes
space using the "IETF Review" policy [RFC5226].
8. Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Maglione Roberta, Alan DeKok, for
valuable comments.
9. Change Log [RFC Editor please remove]
draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-02, redesign the sub TLVs of
the attribute according to Radext WG reviewing, 2011-04-20.
draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-01, minor modifications after
Radext WG reviewing, 2010-11-22.
draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-00, accept as Softwire WG draft
in IETF 79, 2010-11-15.
draft-guo-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-00, renaming and deleting DS-
lite contents, 2010-10-18.
draft-guo-radext-softwire-concentrator-00, original version, 2010-07-
05.
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2865] Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson,
"Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC
2865, June 2000.
[RFC3162] Aboba, B., Zorn, G., and D. Mitton, "RADIUS and IPv6", RFC
3162, August 2001.
[RFC3588] Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J.,
Arkko, "Diameter Base Protocol", RFC 3588, September 2003.
Guo, Jiang & Despres Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-02 April 2011
[RFC4301] Kent, S. and K. Seo, "Security Architecture for the
Internet Protocol", RFC 4301, December 2005.
[RFC5226] T. Narten, H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA
Considerations Section in RFCs", RFC 5226, May 2008.
[RFC5969] Townsley W., et al., "IPv6 Rapid Deployment on IPv4
Infrastructures (6rd) -- Protocol Specification", RFC5969,
August 2010.
10.2. Informative References
[RFC2607] Aboba, B. and J. Vollbrecht, "Proxy Chaining and Policy
Implementation in Roaming", RFC 2607, June 1999.
[RFC2869] Rigney, C., Willats, W., and P. Calhoun, "RADIUS
Extensions", RFC 2869, June 2000.
Author's Addresses
Dayong Guo
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
Huawei Building, No.3 Xinxi Rd.,
Shang-Di Information Industry Base, Hai-Dian District, Beijing 100085
P.R. China
Email: guoseu@huawei.com
Sheng Jiang
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
Huawei Building, No.3 Xinxi Rd.,
Shang-Di Information Industry Base, Hai-Dian District, Beijing 100085
P.R. China
Email: jiangsheng@huawei.com
Remi Despres
RD-IPtech
3 rue du President Wilson
Levallois,
France
Email: remi.despres@free.fr
Guo, Jiang & Despres Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 9]
