INTERNET DRAFT James Kempf
Category: Informational Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Title: draft-ietf-svrloc-template-conversion-06.txt Ryan Moats
Date: Feburary 2000 AT&T Laboratories
Pete St. Pierre
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Conversion of LDAP Schemas to and from SLP Templates
Status of this Memo
This document is an individual contribution for consideration by the
SrvLoc Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at:
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at:
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Copyright (C) The Internet Society 1999. All Rights Reserved.
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 1]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
Abstract
This document describes a procedure for mapping between SLP service
advertisments and LDAP descriptions of services. The document covers
two aspects of the mapping. One aspect is mapping between SLP service
type templates and LDAP directory schema. Because the SLP service
type template grammer is relatively simple, mapping from service type
templates to LDAP types is straightforward. Mapping in the other
direction is straightforward if the attributes are restricted to use
just a few of the syntaxes defined in RFC 2252. If arbitrary ASN.1
types occur in the schema, then the mapping is more complex and may
even be impossible. The second aspect is representation of service
information in an LDAP directory. The recommended representation
simplifies interoperability with SLP by allowing SLP directory agents
to backend into LDAP directory servers. The resulting system allows
service advertisements to propagate easily between SLP and LDAP.
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Mapping SLP Templates to LDAP Schema
2.1 Mapping from SLP Attribute Types to LDAP Attibute Types
2.1.1 Integer
2.1.2 String
2.1.3 Boolean
2.1.4 Opaque
2.2 Keyword Attributes
2.3 Template Flags
2.3.1 Multi-valued
2.3.2 Optional
2.3.3 Literal
2.3.4 Explicit Matching
2.4 Default and Allowed Value Lists
2.5 Descriptive Text
2.6 Generating LDAP Attribute OIDs
2.7 Example
3.0 Attribute Name Conflicts
4.0 Mapping from Schema to Templates
4.1 Mapping LDAP Attribute Types to SLP Attribute Types
4.2 Mapping ASN.1 Types to SLP Types
4.2.1 Integer
4.2.2 Boolean
4.2.3 Enumerated
4.2.4 Object Identifier
4.2.5 Octet String
4.2.6 Real
4.3 Example ASN.1 Schema
5.0 Representing SLP Service Advertisements in an LDAP DIT
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 2]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
6.0 Internationalization Considerations
7.0 Security Considerations
8.0 References
9.0 Full Copyright Statement
10.0 Authors' Addresses
1.0 Introduction
SLP templates [1] are intended to create a simple encoding of the
syntactic and semantic conventions for individual service types,
their attributes, and conventions. They can easily be generated,
transmitted, read by humans and parsed by programs, as it is a string
based syntax with required comments. Directory schemas serve to
formalize directory entry structures for use with LDAP [2] These
directories serve to store information about many types of entities.
Network services are an example of one such entity.
Interoperability between SLP and LDAP is important so clients using
one protocol derive benefit from services registered through the
other. In addition, LDAP directory servers can serve as the backend
for SLP directory agents (DAs) if interoperability is possible In
order to facilitate interoperability, this document creates mappings
between the SLP template grammar and LDAP directory schema, and
establishes some conventions for representing service advertisements
in LDAP directories. The goal of the translation is to allow SLPv2
queries (which are syntatically and semantically equivalent to LDAPv3
string queries [7]) to be submitted to an LDAP directory server by an
SLP DA backended into LDAP without extensive processing by the DA.
The simple notation and syntactic/semantic attribute capabilities of
SLP templates map easily into directory schemas, and are easily
converted into directory schemas, even by automated means. The
reverse may not be true. If the LDAP schema contains attributes with
unrecognized or complex syntaxes, the translation may be difficult or
impossible. If, however, the LDAP schema only uses a few of the
common syntaxes defined in RFC 2252 [8], then the translation is
more straightforward. In addition, to foster complete
bidirectionality, the mapping must follow a very specific
representation in its DESC attributes.
This document outlines the correct mappings for SLP templates into
the syntatic representation specified for LDAP directory schema by
RFC 2252 [8]. This syntax is a subset of the ASN.1/BER described in
the X.209 specification [9], and is used by the LDAPv3 [2] directory
schema. Likewise, rules and guidelines are proposed to facilitate
consistent mapping of ASN.1 based schemas to be translated in the SLP
template grammar. Finally, a proposal for a representation of service
advertisements in LDAP directory services is made that facilitates
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 3]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
SLP interoperability.
Except when used as elements in the definition of LDAP schemas, the
key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [16].
2.0 Mapping SLP Templates to LDAP Schema
We define the following abstract object class as the parent class for
all services. Any specific service type is a subclass of this, with
its own attributes:
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.1
NAME 'slpService'
DESC 'parent superclass for SLP services'
ABSTRACT
SUP top
MUST ( template-major-version-number $
template-minor-version-number $
description $
template-url-syntax $
service-advert-service-type $
service-advert-scopes )
MAY ( service-advert-url-authenticator $
service-advert-attribute-authenticator ) )
The attributes correspond to various parts of the SLP service
template and SLP service advertisement.
SLP service type templates begin with four definitions that set the
context of the template:
template-type - This defines the service type of the template. The
service type can be a simple service type, like ``service:ftp'', an
abstract service type, like ``service:printer'' or a concrete
service type, like ``service:printer:lpr''. The type name can
additionally include a naming authority, for example
``service:printer.sun:local''. The name that appears in this field
omits the ``service:'' prefix.
template-version - A string containing a major and minor version
number, separated by a period.
template-description - A block of human readable text describing
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 4]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
what the service type does.
template-url-syntax - An ABNF [6] grammer describing the service
type specific part of the service URL.
The SLP template-type definition is used as the name of the LDAP
object class for the template, a subclass of the ``slpService''
class, together with the ``service'' prefix to indicate that the name
is for a service. In the translating service type name, colons and
the period separating the naming authority are converted into
hyphens. If the template defines an SLP concrete type, the concrete
type name is used; the abstract type name is never used. For
example, the template for ``service:printer:lpr'' is translated into
an LDAP object class called ``service-printer-lpr''. Furthermore, if
the type name contains a naming authority, the naming authority name
must be included. For example, the service type name
``service:printer.sun:local'' becomes ``service-printer-sun-local''.
The LDAP object class is always ``STRUCTURAL''.
The template-version definition is partitioned into two attributes,
template-major-version-number and template-minor-version-number. The
LDAP definition for these attributes is:
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.1
NAME 'template-major-version-number'
DESC 'The major version number of the service type template'
EQUALITY integerMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27
SINGLE-VALUE
)
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.2
NAME 'template-minor-version-number'
DESC 'The minor version number of the service type template'
EQUALITY integerMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27
SINGLE-VALUE
)
The template-url-syntax definition in the SLP template is described
by the following attribute:
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.3
NAME 'template-url-syntax'
DESC 'An ABNF grammar describing the service type
specific part of the service URL'
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 5]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
EQUALITY caseExactIA5Match
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26
SINGLE-VALUE
)
The template-description attribute is translated into the X.520
standard attribute ``description'' [3].
We further establish the convention that SLP template characteristcs
that can't be translated into LDAP are inserted into the DESC field
of the object class definition. The items are separated by empty
lines (consisting of two "LINE FEED" characters), are preceeded by a
LINE FEED character, and are tagged at the beginning of the line to
indicate what they represent. This allows the template to be
reconstructed from the schema by properly parsing the comments.
The bulk of an SLP template consists of attribute definitions. There
are four items in an SLP template attribute definition that need to
be mapped into LDAP:
Attribute Name - Since SLPv2 attribute names are defined to be
compatible with LDAPv3, SLP attributes map directly into LDAP
attributes with no change. Similarly, LDAP attributes map directly
to SLP attributes.
Attribute Type - The SLP attribute type is mapped into the LDAP
attribute type.
Attribute Flags - The SLP attribute flags are mapped into
characterics of the LDAP attribute definition, or into the DESC
field if no equivalent LDAP attribute definition characteristic
occurs.
Default and Allowed Values - These must be handled by the client or
a DA enabled to handle templates, as in SLP. For reference,
however, they should be included in the DESC field of the LDAP
attribute definition.
Descriptive Text - The SLP template descriptive text should be
mapped into the DESC field.
We discuss mapping of types, flags, default and allowed values, and
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 6]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
descriptive text in the subsections below.
For purposes of representing an SLP entry, we also define two
standardized LDAP syntaxes and attributes with standardized OIDs.
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.2
DESC 'SLP Service Type'
)
Defines the syntax for the service type name. The syntax is defined
in the BNF for the service URL in RFC 2609 Section 2.1 [1].
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.3
DESC 'SLP Scope'
)
Defines the syntax for the scope name. The syntax is defined in the
BNF for scope names in RFC 2608 Section 6.4.1 [5].
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.4
NAME 'service-advert-service-type'
DESC 'The service type of the service advertisement, including the
"service:" prefix.'
EQUALITY caseExactIA5Match
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.2
SINGLE-VALUE
)
Defines an attribute for the service type name.
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.5
NAME 'service-advert-scopes'
DESC 'A list of scopes for a service advertisement.'
EQUALITY caseExactIA5Match
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.3
)
Defines a multivalued attribute for the scopes.
Searches for abstract types can be made with an LDAP query that
wildcards the concrete type. For example, a search for all service
advertisements of the printer abstract type can be made with the
following query:
(service-advert-service-type=service:printer:*)
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 7]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
SLP specifies that service URLs and attribute lists can be
accompanied by a structured authenticator consisting of a digital
signature and information necessary to verify the signature. A
syntax and two standardized SLP attributes are defined for this
purpose:
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.3 DESC 'SLP Authenticator')
The syntax of an SLP authenticator is a sequence of bytes in
network byte order preceeded by the number of bytes in the
sequence, encoded as an INTEGER. The contents of the sequence are
the bytes from the SLP authentication block, see RFC 2608, Section
9.2 [5].
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.6
NAME 'service-advert-url-authenticator'
DESC 'The authenticator for the URL, null if none.'
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.3
SINGLE-VALUE
)
This attribute contains the SLP URL authenticator, as defined in
RFC 2608, Section 9.2 [5].
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.1.7
NAME 'service-advert-attribute-authenticator'
DESC 'The authenticator for the attribute list, null if none.'
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.6252.2.27.6.2.3
SINGLE_VALUE
)
This attribute contains the SLP attribute authenticator, as defined
in RFC 2608, Section 9.2 [5].
2.1 Mapping from SLP Attribute Types to LDAP Attribute Types
We define the mapping from SLP attribute types to LDAP as follows:
SLP Type ASN.1 Type LDAP Type
---------------------------------------------------
Integer INTEGER INTEGER
String DirectoryString Directory String
Boolean BOOLEAN Boolean
Opaque OCTET STRING Octet String
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 8]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
Keyword (N/A) IA5 String
The following subsections discuss further details of the mapping.
2.1.1 Integer
SLP integers compare as integers when performing a query. LDAP
integers behave similarly. Consequently, the mapping from the SLP
integer type to LDAP is INTEGER, with the integerMatch matching rule.
2.1.2 String
SLP strings are encoded as described in the SLP protocol
specification [5]. All value strings are considered case insensitive
for matching operations. SLP strings are not null terminated and are
encoded in UTF-8.
SLP strings are mapped to the LDAP Directory String type. The
Directory String type exactly matches the SLP string type, i.e. it is
a non-null terminated UTF-8 string. The caseIgnoreMatch equality
rule, caseIgnoreOrderingMatch ordering rule, and
caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch substring rule are used for comparing
string attribute values.
2.1.3 Boolean
Boolean attributes may have one of two possible values. In SLP,
these values are represented as strings, TRUE and FALSE. In SLP's
string encoding of a boolean value, case does not matter.
The SLP Boolean type maps directly into an LDAP BOOLEAN. The
caseIgnoreMatch rule is used for equality matching.
2.1.4 Opaque
SLP attribute values of type Opaque are represented as OCTET STRING
in LDAP, and the octetStringMatch matching rule is used to compare
them.
2.2 Keyword Attributes
SLP service type templates allow the definition of keyword
attributes. Keyword attributes are attributes whose only
characteristic is their presence. Keyword attributes have no flag
information, nor any default or allowed values (since, by definition,
they have no values).
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 9]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
ASN.1 has no concept of keyword attributes. Keyword attributes are
translated into a ``May'' clause in the ASN.1 class defintion for the
service type. If the keyword attribute is present, then its value is
of no consequence, but for consistency we make it simply the NUL
character, `` 0''.
2.3 Template Flags
SLP template flags can be handled as described in the following
subsections.
2.3.1 Multi-valued
Multi-valued attributes are defined in an SLP template using the one
value. All values for a given attribute must be of the same type.
LDAP attribute definitions require that a single valued attribute
include the SINGLE-VALUE tag if the attribute is single valued.
Otherwise, the attribute is assumed to be multivalued by default.
2.3.2 Optional
SLP uses the 'O' flag to indicate an attribute may or may not be
present. These optional attributes are defined using the "May"
clause in the ASN.1 definition class definition for the service type.
All other attributes must be defined as a "Must".
2.3.3 Literal
ASN.1 does not have a mechanism to indicate that the values of an
attribute may not be translated from one language to another, since
ASN.1 schema are not typically translated. This flag is dropped when
translating a template, but presence of the flag should be noted in
the DESC field. It should be placed on a separate line and tagged
with ``Literal:'' so the template can be reconstructed from the
schema.
2.3.4 Explicit Matching
The SLP template syntax uses a flag of 'X' to indicate that an
attribute must be present in order for the query to be properly
satisfied. There is no provision for requiring that particular
attributes be in a query. Consequently, this flag is dropped when
translating a template, but presence of the flag should be noted in
the DESC field. It should be placed on a separate line and tagged
with ``Explicit:'' so the template can be reconstructed from the
schema.
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 10]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
2.4 Default and Allowed Value Lists
The SLP template grammar provides the capability to define default
and allowed values for an attribute. The SLP protocol does not
enforce these restrictions on registered attributes, however. The
default and allowed values may be used by client side applications,
or alternatively it may also be used by DAs to initialize
registrations having no attributes and to limit attribute values to
the template allowed values.
LDAP servers also do not support default and allowed values on
attributes. Therefore, enforcement of default and allowed values in
SLP templates is left up to the clients or a DA, if the DA is
backending into LDAP. The default and allowed values should be
included in the DESC field. The comments should be placed on separate
lines and labelled with the ``Default:'' and ``Allowed:'' tags to
allow reconstruction of the tempalte.
2.5 Descriptive Text
The descriptive text associated with an attribute definition should
be included in the DESC field. It should start on a separate line and
begin with the ``Description:'' tag.
2.6 Generating LDAP Attribute OIDs
LDAP attributes require an OID. In general, there is no a priori way
that an algorithm can be defined for generating OIDs, because it will
depend on the conventions used by the organization developing the
template. In some cases, an organization's procedure for generating
OIDs may be regular enough that a template developer can
algorithmically generate OIDs off of an assigned root. Whatever means
is used, the template developer should assure that unique OIDs are
assigned to each SLP attribute that is translated into an LDAP
attribute.
2.7 Example
The template included below is a hypothetical abstract printer
service template, similar to that described in [10].
template-type = printer
template-version = 0.0
template-description =
The printer service template describes the attributes
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 11]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
supported by network printing devices. Devices may be
either directly connected to a network, or connected to a
printer spooler that understands the a network queuing
protocol such as IPP, lpr or the Salutation Architecture.
template-url-syntax =
;The URL syntax is specific to the printing protocol being
;employed
description = STRING
# This attribute is a free form string that can contain any
# site-specific descriptive information about this printer.
printer-security-mechanisms-supported = STRING L M
none
# This attribute indicates the security mechanisms supported
tls, ssl, http-basic, http-digest, none
printer-operator = STRING O L M
# A person, or persons responsible for maintaining a
# printer on a day-to-day basis, including such tasks
# as filling empty media trays, emptying full output
# trays, replacing toner cartridges, clearing simple
# paper jams, etc.
printer-location-address = STRING O
# Physical/Postal address for this device. Useful for
# nailing down a group of printers in a very large corporate
# network. For example: 960 Main Street, San Jose, CA 95130
printer-priority-queue = BOOLEAN O
FALSE
# TRUE indicates this printer or print queue is a priority
# queuing device.
printer-number-up = INTEGER O
1
# This job attribute specifies the number of source
# page-images to impose upon a single side of an instance
# of a selected medium.
1, 2, 4
printer-paper-output = STRING M L O
standard
# This attribute describes the mode in which pages output
# are arranged.
standard, noncollated sort, collated sort, stack, unknown
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 12]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
We assume that the concrete type ``service:printer:lpr'' for printers
that speak the LPR protocol [4] has the following template
definition:
template-type = printer:lpr
template-version = 0.0
template-description =
The printer:lpr service template describes the attributes
supported by network printing devices that speak the
LPR protocol. No new attributes are included.
template-url-syntax = queue
queue = ;The queue name, see RFC 1179.
The LDAP class definition for the ``service:printer:lpr'' concrete
service type is translated as follows:
( ---place the assigned OID here---
NAME 'service-printer-lpr'
DESC 'Description: The printer:lpr service template
describes the attributes supported by network printing
devices that speak the LPR protocol. No new attributes
are included.
URL Syntax: queue
queue = ;The queue name, see RFC 1179.'
SUP slpService
MUST ( description $ security-mechanisms-supported $
labelledURI)
MAY ( operator $ location-address $ priority-queue $
number-up $ paper-output)
)
The attribute definitions are translated as follows:
( ---place the assigned OID here---
NAME 'printer-security-mechanisms-supported'
DESC 'Description: This attribute indicates the security mechanisms
supported.
Default: value
Allowed: tls, ssl, http-basic, http-digest, none
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 13]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
Literal:'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
ORDERING caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15
)
( ---place the assigned OID here---
NAME 'printer-operator'
DESC 'Description: A person, or persons responsible for
maintaining a printer on a day-to-day basis, including
such tasks as filling empty media trays, emptying full
output trays, replacing toner cartridges, clearing simple
paper jams, etc.
Literal:'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
ORDERING caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15
)
( --place the assigned OID here---
NAME 'printer-location-address'
DESC 'Description Physical/Postal address for this device.
Useful for nailing down a group of printers in a very
large corporate network. For example: 960 Main Street,
San Jose, CA 95130.'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
ORDERING caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15
SINGLE-VALUE
)
( ---place the assigned OID here---
NAME 'printer-priority-queue'
DESC 'Description: TRUE indicates this printer or print
queue is a priority queuing device.'
EQUALITY booleanMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7
SINGLE-VALUE
)
( ---place the assigned OID here---
NAME 'printer-number-up'
DESC 'Description: This job attribute specifies the number
of source page-images to impose upon a single side of
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 14]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
an instance of a selected medium. This attribute is
INTEGER.
Default: 1
Allowed: 1, 2, 3, 4'
EQUALITY integerMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27
SINGLE-VALUE
)
( ---place the assigned OID here---
NAME 'printer-paper-output'
DESC 'Description: This attribute describes the mode in
which pages output are arranged. Default value is
standard.
Default: standard
Allowed: standard, noncollated sort, collated sort,
stack, unknown.
Literal:'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
ORDERING caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15
)
3.0 Attribute Name Conflicts
LDAP has a flat name space, and attribute names and OIDs must be
unique in a directory server. In order to avoid name conflicts in the
translation of SLP templates to LDAP schemas, template developers may
want to consider prepending the name of the service type to the
attribute. Postprocessing attribute names to make them unique when
translated is not possible, because it would require the DA to
rewrite queries before submitting them to the directory server. In
addition, developers should use standard LDAP attributes when such
attributes are available.
In the above example template, the abstract type name ``printer'' is
prepended to attributes to avoid conflicts. The standard
``description'' attribute defined by X.520 [3] is used to translate
the template description attribute.
4.0 Mapping from Schema to Templates
The reverse mapping from LDAP schema to SLP service type templates
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 15]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
requires dealing with both LDAP and ASN.1 data types. RFC 2252
defines 33 attribute syntaxes that should be supported by LDAP
directory servers. These syntaxes are defined using BNF for strings
or using ASN.1 for binary valued attributes defined by X.520.
Mapping of the LDAP data types into SLP template types is fairly
straightforward, but mapping arbitrary ASN.1 data types is somewhat
more complicated and requires encoding the ASN.1 data type into a
string. To a certain extent, this masks the ASN.1 data type because
it becomes impossible to distinguish between a native string having
content equivalent to an encoded ASN.1 string. However, inclusion of
the ASN.1 data type in the comment provides additional information
should a reverse transformation from SLP to ASN.1 be required.
The following subsections deal with both LDAP and ASN.1 attribute
data type mappings.
4.1 Mapping LDAP Attribute Syntaxes to SLP Attribute Types
The following table contains the mappings for LDAP syntaxes to SLP
data types:
LDAP Type SLP Type
--------------------------------------------------------
ACI Item NA
Access Point NA
Attribute Type Description NA
Audio Opaque
Binary ASN.1 escape
Bit String String
Boolean Boolean
Certificate Opaque
Certificate List Opaque
Certificate Pair Opaque
Country String String
DN String
Data Quality Syntax NA
Delivery Method NA
Directory String String
DIT Content Rule Description NA
DIT Structure Rule Description NA
DL Submit Permission NA
DSA Quality Syntax NA
Enhanced Guide NA
Facsimile Telephone Number String
Fax Opaque
Generalized Time String
Guide NA
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 16]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
IA5 String String
INTEGER Integer
JPEG Opaque
LDAP Syntax Description NA
LDAP Schema Definition NA
LDAP Schema Description NA
Master and Shadow Access Points NA
Matching Rule Description NA
Matching Rule Use Description NA
Mail Preference NA
MHS OR Address String
Modify Rights NA
Name and Optional UID NA
Name Form Description NA
Numeric String String
Object Class Description NA
Octet String Opaque
OID String
Other Mailbox String
Postal Address String
Protocol Information NA
Presentation Address String
Printable String String
Substring Assertion NA
Subtree Specification NA
Supplier Information NA
Supplier or Consumer NA
Supplier And Consumer NA
Supported Algorithm NA
DSE Type NA
Telephone Number String
Teletex Terminal Identifier String
Telex Number String
UTC Time String
4.2 Mapping ASN.1 Types to SLP Types
ASN.1 employs a much richer set of data types than provided by SLP.
The table below show the mapping of selected ASN.1 data type to their
nearest SLP equivalent. Because of the complexity and flexibility of
ASN.1, a complete list cannot be provided.
As sample of some ASN.1 encodings and their mappings to SLP:
ASN.1 type SLP type
-----------------------------------------
INTEGER Integer
BOOLEAN Boolean
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 17]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
ENUMERATED String
OBJECT IDENTIFIER String
OCTET STRING Opaque
REAL String
Data types that do not map directly to SLP data types should be
defined as either a String, or as Opaque. ASN.1 types that may only
contain valid characters for Strings, as defined in X.680 [9] should
be encoded as strings. ASN.1 types such as GraphicString that change
their character set encoding in part way through a value should not
be encoded as strings, however, If such types are required, the SLP
Opaque type should be used. In either case, the first line of the
help text is used to indicate the original ASN.1 data type.
The following subsections describe how to convert from the ASN.1 BER
[9] to the SLP template for the different types in the table above.
4.2.1 Integer
Both SLP templates and ASN.1 support Integers, so there is a one to
one mapping between an SLP Integer attribute and an ASN.1 Integer
attribute. Details on the encoding of integers is summarized in the
SLP template to ASN.1 section above.
4.2.2 Boolean
Boolean values are supported by both SLP and ASN.1, though on wire
encodings differ. X.680 [9] specifies zero and non-zero encoding for
booleans, where SLP encodes booleans using the strings TRUE and
FALSE. In general, most LDAP servers will use the LDAP Boolean type
(which is a string), so again the ASN.1 type should be recorded in
the comment or it will be lost.
4.2.3 Enumerated
SLP templates support the concept of enumerations through the listing
of allowed values in the attribute definition. These enumerations
are not strictly binding on clients or DAs, but they are similar to
the ASN.1 definition of enumerations. BER encodes the ASN.1
enumeration by passing the number of the element's position in the
enumeration. This requires both sides to have knowledge of the
specific enumeration prior to decoding an enumeration's value. SLP
provides no specific support for transmitting enumerations. They are
simply String types. Information on the ASN.1 type and ASN.1 encoding
of the enumeration values is recorded in the comment.
Example:
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 18]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
color-supported = STRING M
none
# ASN.1: Enumeration.
# ASN.1 Mapping: none = 0, highlight = 1, three color = 2, four color = 4,
# monochrmatic = 5
#This attribute specifies whether the Printer supports
# color and, if so, what type.
none,highlight,three color,four color,monochromatic
4.2.4 Object Identifier
Object identifiers(OIDs) are commonly used in the ASN.1 world to
identify object and attributes. OIDs are a numerical representation
of an element's place in the naming hierarchy. Each element at a
particular level of a hierarchy has a unique number assigned within
that level of the hierarchy. A sample OID would be the naming tree
for SNMP MIBs: iso(1) org(3) dod(6) internet(1) mgmt(2) mib(1) would
be written as the string ``1.3.6.1.2.1''.
Because this representation reduces down to a string of dot separated
numbers, this maps easily to the SLP String type. The help text for
this element should indicate it is an ASN.1 OID
identifier = STRING
# ASN.1: OID
# The object identifier for this SNMP agent.
4.2.5 Octet String
An ASN.1 octet string should be mapped to an Opaque in an SLP
template. An octet string is a sequence of bytes, whereas an Opaque
is a a string that encodes a sequence of bytes. Again, the ASN.1 type
is lost unless recorded in the comment.
4.2.6 Real
There is no direct mapping between floating point numbers and any SLP
data types. Attributes having the ASN.1 type of Real are mapped to
SLP type String. Comments are added to the attribute help text
indicating the value was originally an ASN.1 real. For example:
weight = STRING
# ASN.1: Real
# The objects weight in pounds.
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 19]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
4.3 Example ASN.1 Schema
The following is an example schema for an exported filesystem. The
section presents it as in ASN.1 and the following section shows the
SLP template translation. The template translation does not capture
the actual attribute format for the Set type, that would be done in
the LDAP client software making the translation. Note that even
though the class definition does not conform with the previously
defined conventions for SLP classes, the schema can still be
translated into an SLP template.
-- abstraction of a fstab entry (a "mount")
-- these lookups would likely be performed by an
-- an automounter type application
mount OBJECT-CLASS
SUBCLASS OF top
MUST CONTAIN {
-- the mount host
mountHost,
-- the mount point
mountDirectory.
-- the mount type
mountType
}
MAY CONTAIN {
-- mount options
mountOption,
-- dump frequency
mountDumpFrequency,
-- passno
mountPassNo
}
mountHost OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Case Ignore String
DESCRIPTION
"The mount host"
mountDirectory OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Case Ignore String
DESCRIPTION
"The filesystem to mount"
mountType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
ufs(1)
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 20]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
hsfs(2)
nfs(3)
rfs(4)
}
DESCRIPTION
"The type of the filesystem being mounted"
mountOption OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SET OF Case Ignore String
DESCRIPTION
"mount options for this filesystem"
mountDumpFrequency OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER (0..9)
DESCRIPTION
"How often to dump this filesystem"
mountPassNo OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer
DESCRIPTION
"Boot time mount pass number"
The translated SLP template is:
template-type = mount
template-version = 1.0
template-description = "Describes a remote filesystem access protocol"
template-url-syntax =
filesystem = 1*[ DIGIT / ALPHA ]
urlpath = "/" filesystem
mountHost = STRING L
# ASN.1: Case Ignore String
# The mount host
mountDirectory = STRING L
# ASN.1: Case Ignore String
# The filesystem to mount
mountType = STRING L
ufs
# ASN.1: Enumeration
# ASN.1 Mapping: ufs = 1, hsfs = 2, nfs = 3, rfs = 4
# The type of the filesystem being mounted
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 21]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
ufs, hsfs, nfs, rfs
mountOption = STRING M O L
# ASN.1: Set of Case Ignore String
# mount options for this filesystem
mountDumpFrequency = INTEGER O
0
# ASN.1: Integer Range
# How often to dump this filesystem
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
mountPassNo = INTEGER O
# ASN.1: Integer
# Boot time mount pass number
5.0 Representing SLP Service Advertisments in an LDAP DIT
In addition to translating between SLP templates and LDAP schema,
another area requiring compatibility is the representation of SLP
service advertisements in an LDAP DIT. A standardized representation
for service information allows SLP DAs to store service
advertisements in LDAP, and for LDAP clients to query the DIT for
those services. Similarly, if LDAP clients represent service
information in the same form, SLP clients can benefit from
interoperability.
A service advertisement contains the service URL in a 'labelledURI'
attribute [11]. The labelledURI attribute in a service advertisement
should only contain the service URL for the service, with no
additional label.It is recommended that the labelledURI be used as
the RDN for the service object in the DIT.
Although service advertisements can appear anywhere within the DIT,
it is recommended that all services be stored under a single common
point to facilitate searching in a domain. This allows a client to
search for all of advertisements of a particular service type, say,
for all printers. The recommended parent entry is one named
"ou=service" below the entry which is the representation of the
domain, as described in RFC 2247.
For example, a printer service with labelledURI of
"service:lpr://printsrv/queue1" in the domain foobar.com would be
advertised in the LDAP server that holds the entry "dc=foobar,dc=com"
tree would have the following DN:
"labelledURI=service:lpr://printsrv/queue1, ou=service, dc=foobar, dc=com"
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 22]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
While this leads to a flat space of service storage, since SLP uses
search filters from LDAP for searches, these filters can be used for
one-level searches from the root node.
The following example illustrates how an advertisement having a
simple service type is represented. The advertisment (in conceptual
form) for a printer is:
Service Type: service:lpr://printsrv/queue1
Scopes: eng,corp
Attributes:
description = A general printer for all to use.
security-mechanisms-supported = none
Authentication: none
The RDN of the object is labelledURI=service:lpr://printsrv/queue1,
and the following LDAP search filter will return this object, along
with any others of the service type ``service:lpr'' that match the
other attributes:
(&(service-advert-service-type=service:lpr)
(service-advert-scopes=eng)
(service-advert-scopes=corp)
(description=A general printer for all to use)
(security-mechanisms-supported=none))
Service advertisements in SLP also have a lease time associated with
them. In LDAP servers that support the extensions for dynamic
directory services [12], the service advertisement entry objectClass
should be extended with the dynamicObject class. This allows the
service advertisment to time out within the LDAP directory server. If
the LDAP directory server does not support the dynamic directory
services extension, then advertisement lease timeouts must be handled
by the SLP agent.
While the service advertisement schema outlined in this section is
primarily for SLP DAs that use LDAP as a backing store, if LDAP
agents register services using the same format, complete
interoperability with SLP is achieved.
6.0 Internationalization Considerations
SLP specifies that an RFC 1766 [13] language code accompanies every
service advertisement. Language codes for service advertisements in
LDAP must be represented according to RFC 2596 [14].
RFC 2596 prohibits language codes in DNs, and specifies that a
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 23]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
directory server which does not support language codes must treat an
attribute with a language code as an unrecognized attributes.
According to RFC 2596, language codes are appended to attribute names
with a semicolon (``;''). For example, the following attribute/value
pair is in the German locale:
(address;lang-de=44 Bahnhofstrasse, 2365 Weibstadt, Deutschland)
An attribute with a language tag in a specific locale is considered a
separate attribute from attributes in other locales.
If the service advertisement is in the default SLP locale (``en'', no
dialect), then the language code need not be appended to the
attribute name.
SLP queries in locales other than the default need not be rewritten
to include language tags before being submitted to the directory
server. RFC 2596 specifies that all entries that match are returned,
including those with language tags, without requiring the language
tags to be explicitly present in the query. The SLP DA can then
postprocess the result to select the entries from the required
locale.
7.0 Security Considerations
SLP authenticators are stored with the service advertisement in the
DIT, as discussed in Section~7ef{slpdit}. LDAP clients need to use
LDAP authentication [15] to assure that they are connecting with a
secure server. In particular, SLP DAs that use LDAP as a back end
store and that implement SLP authentication MUST use LDAP
authentication to assure that the LDAP entries for their service
registrations are secure.
Acknowledgements
Many thanks are due to Mark Wahl whose detailed and insightful
comments were instrumental in helping improve the technical accuracy
of this draft with respect to LDAP.
7.0 References
[1] E. Guttman, C. Perkins, J. Kempf. Service Templates and service:
Schemes. RFC 2609, April, 1999.
[2] M. Wahl, T. Howes, and S. Kille. Lightweight Directory Access
Protocol (v3). RFC 2251, December, 1997.
[3] International Telecommunications Union. The Directory:Selected
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 24]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
Attribute Types. ITU Recommendation X.520. August, 1997.
[4] L. McLaughlin. Line Printer Daemon Protocol. RFC 1179. August,
1990.
[5] E. Guttman, C ~Perkins, J. Veizades, and M. Day. Service Location
Protocol Version 2. RFC 2608. April, 1999.
[6] D. Crocker and P. Overell. Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF. RFC 2234. November, 1997.
[7] T. Howes. The String Representation of LDAP Search Filters. RFC
2254. December, 1997.
[8] M. Wahl, A. Coulbeck, T. Howe, and S. Kille. Lightweight
Directory Access Protocol (v3): Attribute Syntax Definition. RFC
2252. December, 1997.
[9] ITU-T Rec. X.680. Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) -
Specification of Basic Notation. 1994.
[10] P. St. Pierre, S. Isaccson, I. McDonald. Definition of printer:
URLs for use with Service Location. draft-ietf-svrloc-printer-
scheme-xx.txt. Work in Progress.
[11] M. Smith. Definition of an X.500 Attribute Type and an Object
Class to Hold Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs). RFC 2079. January,
1997.
[12] Y. Yaacovi, M. Wahl, and T. Genovese. Lightweight Directory
Access Protocol (v3): Extensions for Dynamic Directory Services. RFC
2589. May, 1999.
[13] H. Alvestrand. Tags for the Identification of Languages. RFC
1766. December, 1997.
[14] M. Wahl and T. Howes. Use of Language Codes in LDAP. RFC 2596.
May, 1999.
[15] M. Wahl, H. Alvestrand, J. Hodges, and R. Morgan. Authentication
Methods for LDAP. draft-ietf-ldapext-authmeth-xx.txt. Work in
Progress.
[16] S. Bradner. Key Words for Use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels. RFC 2119. March 1997.
9.0 Full Copyright Statement
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 25]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1997). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implmentation may be prepared, copied, published and
distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind,
provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE."
10.0 Authors' Address
James Kempf Ryan Moats
Sun Microsystems AT&T Laboratories
901 San Antonio Avenue 15621 Drexel Circle
Palo Alto, CA 94303 Omaha, NE, 68135
USA
Phone: +1 650 786-5890 +1 402 894-9456
Email: james.kempf@sun.com jayhawk@att.com
Pete St. Pierre
Sun Microsystems
901 San Antonio Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94303
USA
Phone: +1 415 786-5790
Email: Pete.StPierre@Eng.Sun.COM
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 26]
INTERNET DRAFT June 2000
Calhoun and Kempf expires November 2000 [Page 27]