TEAS Working Group V. Beeram
Internet-Draft T. Saad
Intended status: Standards Track Juniper Networks
Expires: September 10, 2020 R. Gandhi
Cisco Systems, Inc.
X. Liu
Volta Networks
I. Bryskin
Huawei Technologies
H. Shah
Ciena
March 09, 2020
A YANG Data Model for RSVP-TE Protocol
draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-08
Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model for the configuration and
management of RSVP (Resource Reservation Protocol) to establish
Traffic-Engineered (TE) Label-Switched Paths (LSPs) for MPLS (Multi-
Protocol Label Switching) and other technologies.
The model defines a generic RSVP-TE module for signaling LSPs that
are technology agnostic. The generic RSVP-TE module is to be
augmented by technology specific RSVP-TE modules that define
technology specific data. This document also defines the
augmentation for RSVP-TE MPLS LSPs model.
This model covers data for the configuration, operational state,
remote procedural calls, and event notifications.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 10, 2020.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Model Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Module Relationship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. Model Tree Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2.1. RSVP-TE Model Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2.2. RSVP-TE MPLS Model Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.3. YANG Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.3.1. RSVP-TE YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.3.2. RSVP-TE MPLS YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
5. Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
1. Introduction
YANG [RFC7950] is a data modeling language that was introduced to
define the contents of a conceptual data store that allows networked
devices to be managed using NETCONF [RFC6241]. YANG has proved
relevant beyond its initial confines, as bindings to other interfaces
(e.g. RESTCONF [RFC8040]) and encoding other than XML (e.g. JSON)
are being defined. Furthermore, YANG data models can be used as the
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
basis of implementation for other interfaces, such as CLI and
programmatic APIs.
This document defines a generic YANG data model for configuring and
managing RSVP-TE LSP(s) [RFC3209]. The RSVP-TE generic model
augments the RSVP base and extended models defined in
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-rsvp], and adds TE extensions to the RSVP
protocol [RFC2205] model configuration and state data. The
technology specific RSVP-TE models augment the generic RSVP-TE model
with additional technology specific parameters. For example, this
document also defines the MPLS RSVP-TE model for configuring and
managing MPLS RSVP TE LSP(s).
In addition to augmenting the RSVP YANG module, the modules defined
in this document augment the TE Interfaces, Tunnels and LSP(s) YANG
module defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te] to define additional
parameters to enable signaling for RSVP-TE.
1.1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in
[RFC7950].
1.2. Prefixes in Data Node Names
In this document, names of data nodes and other data model objects
are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the
corresponding YANG imported modules, as shown in Table 1.
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
+---------------+--------------------+-------------------------------+
| Prefix | YANG module | Reference |
+---------------+--------------------+-------------------------------+
| yang | ietf-yang-types | [RFC6991] |
| inet | ietf-inet-types | [RFC6991] |
| te | ietf-te | [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te] |
| rsvp | ietf-rsvp | [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-rsvp] |
| te-dev | ietf-te-device | [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te] |
| te-types | ietf-te-types | [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types] |
| te-mpls-types | ietf-te-mpls-types | [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types] |
| rsvp-te | ietf-rsvp-te | this document |
| rsvp-te-mpls | ietf-rsvp-te-mpls | this document |
+---------------+--------------------+-------------------------------+
Table 1: Prefixes and corresponding YANG modules
2. Model Overview
The RSVP-TE generic model augments the RSVP base and extended YANG
models defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-rsvp]. It also augments the TE
tunnels and interfaces module defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te] to
cover parameters specific to the configuration and management of
RSVP-TE interfaces, tunnels and LSP(s).
The RSVP-TE MPLS YANG model augments the RSVP-TE generic model with
parameters to configure and manage signaling of MPLS RSVP-TE LSPs.
RSVP-TE model augmentation for other dataplane technologies (e.g.
OTN or WDM) are outside the scope of this document.
There are three types of configuration and state data nodes in
module(s) defined in this document:
o those augmenting or extending the base RSVP module that is defined
in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-rsvp]
o those augmenting or extending the base TE module defined in
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]
o those that are specific to the RSVP-TE and RSVP-TE MPLS modules
defined in this document.
2.1. Module Relationship
The data pertaining to RSVP-TE in this document is divided into two
modules: a technology agnostic RSVP-TE module that holds generic
parameters for RSVP-TE applicable to all technologies, and a MPLS
technology specific RSVP-TE module that holds parameters specific to
MPLS technology.
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
The relationship between the different modules is shown in Figure 1.
TE basic +---------+
module | ietf-te | o: augment
+---------+
o
|
|
+--------------+
RSVP-TE module | ietf-rsvp-te |o . . .
+--------------+ \
| \
o +--------------------+
+-----------+ | ietf-rsvp-te-mpls |
RSVP module | ietf-rsvp | +--------------------+
+-----------+ RSVP-TE with MPLS
o
|
RSVP extended |
module +--------------------+
| ietf-rsvp-extended |
+--------------------+
Figure 1: Relationship of RSVP and RSVP-TE modules with other
protocol modules
2.2. Model Tree Diagrams
A full tree diagram of the module(s) defined in this document as per
the syntax defined in [RFC8340] are given in subsequent sections.
2.2.1. RSVP-TE Model Tree Diagram
Figure 2 shows the YANG tree diagram of the RSVP-TE generic YANG
model defined in module ietf-rsvp-te.yang.
module: ietf-rsvp-te
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:globals:
+--rw global-soft-preemption!
+--rw soft-preemption-timeout? uint16
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:interfaces:
+--rw rsvp-te-interface-attributes
+--ro state
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:interfaces
/rsvp:interface:
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
+--rw rsvp-te-interface-attributes
+--ro state
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:globals
/rsvp:sessions:
+--ro session-te* [tunnel-endpoint tunnel-id extended-tunnel-id]
+--ro tunnel-endpoint inet:ip-address
+--ro tunnel-id uint16
+--ro extended-tunnel-id inet:ip-address
+--ro destination-port? inet:port-number
+--ro protocol-id? uint8
+--ro source? inet:ip-address
+--ro destination? inet:ip-address
+--ro session-name? string
+--ro session-state? enumeration
+--ro session-type? identityref
+--ro psbs
| +--ro psb* []
| +--ro source-port? inet:port-number
| +--ro expires-in? uint32
| +--ro tspec-average-rate? rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
| +--ro tspec-size? rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
| +--ro tspec-peak-rate? rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
| +--ro min-policed-unit? uint32
| +--ro max-packet-size? uint32
+--ro rsbs
+--ro rsb* []
+--ro source-port? inet:port-number
+--ro reservation-style? identityref
+--ro expires-in? uint32
+--ro fspec-average-rate? rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
+--ro fspec-size? rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
+--ro fspec-peak-rate? rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32
+--ro min-policed-unit? uint32
+--ro max-packet-size? uint32
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:neighbors:
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel:
+--rw lsp-signaled-name? string
+--rw session-attribute* identityref
+--rw lsp-attribute* identityref
+--rw retry-timer? uint16
augment /te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp:
+--ro associated-rsvp-session? leafref
+--ro lsp-signaled-name? string
+--ro session-attribute* identityref
+--ro lsp-attribute* identityref
+--ro explicit-route-objects
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
| +--ro incoming-explicit-route-hop* [index]
| | +--ro index uint32
| | +--ro (type)?
| | +--:(numbered-node-hop)
| | | +--ro numbered-node-hop
| | | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | +--:(numbered-link-hop)
| | | +--ro numbered-link-hop
| | | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | | +--ro direction? te-link-direction
| | +--:(unnumbered-link-hop)
| | | +--ro unnumbered-link-hop
| | | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | | +--ro direction? te-link-direction
| | +--:(as-number)
| | | +--ro as-number-hop
| | | +--ro as-number inet:as-number
| | | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | +--:(label)
| | +--ro label-hop
| | +--ro te-label
| | +--ro (technology)?
| | | +--:(generic)
| | | +--ro generic? rt-types:generalized-label
| | +--ro direction? te-label-direction
| +--ro outgoing-explicit-route-hop* [index]
| +--ro index uint32
| +--ro (type)?
| +--:(numbered-node-hop)
| | +--ro numbered-node-hop
| | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| +--:(numbered-link-hop)
| | +--ro numbered-link-hop
| | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | +--ro direction? te-link-direction
| +--:(unnumbered-link-hop)
| | +--ro unnumbered-link-hop
| | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | +--ro direction? te-link-direction
| +--:(as-number)
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
| | +--ro as-number-hop
| | +--ro as-number inet:as-number
| | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| +--:(label)
| +--ro label-hop
| +--ro te-label
| +--ro (technology)?
| | +--:(generic)
| | +--ro generic? rt-types:generalized-label
| +--ro direction? te-label-direction
+--ro incoming-record-route-subobjects
| +--ro incoming-record-route-subobject* [index]
| +--ro index uint32
| +--ro (type)?
| +--:(numbered-node-hop)
| | +--ro numbered-node-hop
| | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
| +--:(numbered-link-hop)
| | +--ro numbered-link-hop
| | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
| +--:(unnumbered-link-hop)
| | +--ro unnumbered-link-hop
| | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | +--ro node-id? te-node-id
| | +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
| +--:(label)
| +--ro label-hop
| +--ro te-label
| | +--ro (technology)?
| | | +--:(generic)
| | | +--ro generic? rt-types:generalized-label
| | +--ro direction? te-label-direction
| +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
+--ro outgoing-record-route-subobjects
+--ro outgoing-record-route-subobject* [index]
+--ro index uint32
+--ro (type)?
+--:(numbered-node-hop)
| +--ro numbered-node-hop
| +--ro node-id te-node-id
| +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
+--:(numbered-link-hop)
| +--ro numbered-link-hop
| +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
+--:(unnumbered-link-hop)
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
| +--ro unnumbered-link-hop
| +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| +--ro node-id? te-node-id
| +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
+--:(label)
+--ro label-hop
+--ro te-label
| +--ro (technology)?
| | +--:(generic)
| | +--ro generic? rt-types:generalized-label
| +--ro direction? te-label-direction
+--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths/te:primary-path
/te:lsps/te:lsp:
+--ro associated-rsvp-session? leafref
+--ro lsp-signaled-name? string
+--ro session-attribute* identityref
+--ro lsp-attribute* identityref
+--ro explicit-route-objects
| +--ro incoming-explicit-route-hop* [index]
| | +--ro index uint32
| | +--ro (type)?
| | +--:(numbered-node-hop)
| | | +--ro numbered-node-hop
| | | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | +--:(numbered-link-hop)
| | | +--ro numbered-link-hop
| | | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | | +--ro direction? te-link-direction
| | +--:(unnumbered-link-hop)
| | | +--ro unnumbered-link-hop
| | | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | | +--ro direction? te-link-direction
| | +--:(as-number)
| | | +--ro as-number-hop
| | | +--ro as-number inet:as-number
| | | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | +--:(label)
| | +--ro label-hop
| | +--ro te-label
| | +--ro (technology)?
| | | +--:(generic)
| | | +--ro generic? rt-types:generalized-label
| | +--ro direction? te-label-direction
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
| +--ro outgoing-explicit-route-hop* [index]
| +--ro index uint32
| +--ro (type)?
| +--:(numbered-node-hop)
| | +--ro numbered-node-hop
| | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| +--:(numbered-link-hop)
| | +--ro numbered-link-hop
| | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | +--ro direction? te-link-direction
| +--:(unnumbered-link-hop)
| | +--ro unnumbered-link-hop
| | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | +--ro direction? te-link-direction
| +--:(as-number)
| | +--ro as-number-hop
| | +--ro as-number inet:as-number
| | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| +--:(label)
| +--ro label-hop
| +--ro te-label
| +--ro (technology)?
| | +--:(generic)
| | +--ro generic? rt-types:generalized-label
| +--ro direction? te-label-direction
+--ro incoming-record-route-subobjects
| +--ro incoming-record-route-subobject* [index]
| +--ro index uint32
| +--ro (type)?
| +--:(numbered-node-hop)
| | +--ro numbered-node-hop
| | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
| +--:(numbered-link-hop)
| | +--ro numbered-link-hop
| | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
| +--:(unnumbered-link-hop)
| | +--ro unnumbered-link-hop
| | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | +--ro node-id? te-node-id
| | +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
| +--:(label)
| +--ro label-hop
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
| +--ro te-label
| | +--ro (technology)?
| | | +--:(generic)
| | | +--ro generic? rt-types:generalized-label
| | +--ro direction? te-label-direction
| +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
+--ro outgoing-record-route-subobjects
+--ro outgoing-record-route-subobject* [index]
+--ro index uint32
+--ro (type)?
+--:(numbered-node-hop)
| +--ro numbered-node-hop
| +--ro node-id te-node-id
| +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
+--:(numbered-link-hop)
| +--ro numbered-link-hop
| +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
+--:(unnumbered-link-hop)
| +--ro unnumbered-link-hop
| +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| +--ro node-id? te-node-id
| +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
+--:(label)
+--ro label-hop
+--ro te-label
| +--ro (technology)?
| | +--:(generic)
| | +--ro generic? rt-types:generalized-label
| +--ro direction? te-label-direction
+--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths/te:primary-path
/te:lsp-provisioning-error-infos
/te:lsp-provisioning-error-info:
+--ro rsvp-message-type? identityref
+--ro rsvp-error-code? uint8
+--ro rsvp-error-subcode? uint16
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths/te:primary-path
/te:lsps/te:lsp/te:lsp-provisioning-error-infos
/te:lsp-provisioning-error-info:
+--ro rsvp-message-type? identityref
+--ro rsvp-error-code? uint8
+--ro rsvp-error-subcode? uint16
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:secondary-paths
/te:secondary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp:
+--ro associated-rsvp-session? leafref
+--ro lsp-signaled-name? string
+--ro session-attribute* identityref
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
+--ro lsp-attribute* identityref
+--ro explicit-route-objects
| +--ro incoming-explicit-route-hop* [index]
| | +--ro index uint32
| | +--ro (type)?
| | +--:(numbered-node-hop)
| | | +--ro numbered-node-hop
| | | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | +--:(numbered-link-hop)
| | | +--ro numbered-link-hop
| | | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | | +--ro direction? te-link-direction
| | +--:(unnumbered-link-hop)
| | | +--ro unnumbered-link-hop
| | | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | | +--ro direction? te-link-direction
| | +--:(as-number)
| | | +--ro as-number-hop
| | | +--ro as-number inet:as-number
| | | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | +--:(label)
| | +--ro label-hop
| | +--ro te-label
| | +--ro (technology)?
| | | +--:(generic)
| | | +--ro generic? rt-types:generalized-label
| | +--ro direction? te-label-direction
| +--ro outgoing-explicit-route-hop* [index]
| +--ro index uint32
| +--ro (type)?
| +--:(numbered-node-hop)
| | +--ro numbered-node-hop
| | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| +--:(numbered-link-hop)
| | +--ro numbered-link-hop
| | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| | +--ro direction? te-link-direction
| +--:(unnumbered-link-hop)
| | +--ro unnumbered-link-hop
| | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
| | +--ro direction? te-link-direction
| +--:(as-number)
| | +--ro as-number-hop
| | +--ro as-number inet:as-number
| | +--ro hop-type? te-hop-type
| +--:(label)
| +--ro label-hop
| +--ro te-label
| +--ro (technology)?
| | +--:(generic)
| | +--ro generic? rt-types:generalized-label
| +--ro direction? te-label-direction
+--ro incoming-record-route-subobjects
| +--ro incoming-record-route-subobject* [index]
| +--ro index uint32
| +--ro (type)?
| +--:(numbered-node-hop)
| | +--ro numbered-node-hop
| | +--ro node-id te-node-id
| | +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
| +--:(numbered-link-hop)
| | +--ro numbered-link-hop
| | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
| +--:(unnumbered-link-hop)
| | +--ro unnumbered-link-hop
| | +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| | +--ro node-id? te-node-id
| | +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
| +--:(label)
| +--ro label-hop
| +--ro te-label
| | +--ro (technology)?
| | | +--:(generic)
| | | +--ro generic? rt-types:generalized-label
| | +--ro direction? te-label-direction
| +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
+--ro outgoing-record-route-subobjects
+--ro outgoing-record-route-subobject* [index]
+--ro index uint32
+--ro (type)?
+--:(numbered-node-hop)
| +--ro numbered-node-hop
| +--ro node-id te-node-id
| +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
+--:(numbered-link-hop)
| +--ro numbered-link-hop
| +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
| +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
+--:(unnumbered-link-hop)
| +--ro unnumbered-link-hop
| +--ro link-tp-id te-tp-id
| +--ro node-id? te-node-id
| +--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
+--:(label)
+--ro label-hop
+--ro te-label
| +--ro (technology)?
| | +--:(generic)
| | +--ro generic? rt-types:generalized-label
| +--ro direction? te-label-direction
+--ro flags* path-attribute-flags
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:secondary-paths
/te:secondary-path/te:lsp-provisioning-error-infos
/te:lsp-provisioning-error-info:
+--ro rsvp-message-type? identityref
+--ro rsvp-error-code? uint8
+--ro rsvp-error-subcode? uint16
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:secondary-paths
/te:secondary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp
/te:lsp-provisioning-error-infos
/te:lsp-provisioning-error-info:
+--ro rsvp-message-type? identityref
+--ro rsvp-error-code? uint8
+--ro rsvp-error-subcode? uint16
augment /te:te/te-dev:interfaces/te-dev:interface:
Figure 2: RSVP-TE model Tree diagram
2.2.2. RSVP-TE MPLS Model Tree Diagram
Figure 5 shows the YANG tree diagram of the RSVP-TE MPLS YANG model
defined in module ietf-rsvp-te-mpls.yang and that augments RSVP-TE
module as well as RSVP and TE YANG modules.
module: ietf-rsvp-te-mpls
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp:
+--rw fast-reroute-local-revertive
+--rw rsvp-frr-local-revert-delay? uint32
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:interfaces:
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:interfaces
/rsvp:interface:
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:globals
/rsvp:sessions:
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:neighbors:
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel:
+--rw session-attribute* identityref
augment /te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp:
+--ro session-attribute* identityref
+--ro backup-info
+--ro backup-tunnel-name? string
+--ro backup-frr-on? uint8
+--ro backup-protected-lsp-num? uint32
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths/te:primary-path
/te:lsps/te:lsp:
+--ro session-attribute* identityref
+--ro backup-info
+--ro backup-tunnel-name? string
+--ro backup-frr-on? uint8
+--ro backup-protected-lsp-num? uint32
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:secondary-paths
/te:secondary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp:
+--ro session-attribute* identityref
+--ro backup-info
+--ro backup-tunnel-name? string
+--ro backup-frr-on? uint8
+--ro backup-protected-lsp-num? uint32
augment /te:te/te-dev:interfaces/te-dev:interface:
+--rw bandwidth-mpls-reservable
+--rw (bandwidth-value)?
| +--:(absolute)
| | +--rw absolute-value? te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps
| +--:(percentage)
| +--rw percent-value? uint32
+--rw (bc-model-type)?
+--:(bc-model-rdm)
| +--rw bc-model-rdm
| +--rw bandwidth-mpls-constraints
| +--rw maximum-reservable?
| | te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps
| +--rw bc-value* uint32
+--:(bc-model-mam)
| +--rw bc-model-mam
| +--rw bandwidth-mpls-constraints
| +--rw maximum-reservable?
| | te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps
| +--rw bc-value* uint32
+--:(bc-model-mar)
+--rw bc-model-mar
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
+--rw bandwidth-mpls-constraints
+--rw maximum-reservable?
| te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps
+--rw bc-value* uint32
augment /te:te/te-dev:interfaces/te-dev:interface:
+--rw rsvp-te-frr-backups
+--rw (type)?
+--:(static-tunnel)
| +--rw static-backups
| +--rw static-backup* [backup-tunnel-name]
| +--rw backup-tunnel-name
| -> /te:te/tunnels/tunnel/name
+--:(auto-tunnel)
+--rw auto-tunnel-backups
+--rw auto-backup-protection? identityref
+--rw auto-backup-path-computation? identityref
Figure 3: RSVP-TE MPLS Tree diagram
2.3. YANG Modules
2.3.1. RSVP-TE YANG Module
The RSVP-TE generic YANG module "ietf-rsvp-te" imports the following
modules:
o ietf-rsvp defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-rsvp]
o ietf-routing-types defined in [RFC8294]
o ietf-te-types defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types]
o ietf-te and ietf-te-dev defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]
This module references the following documents:
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-rsvp], [RFC8349], [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te],
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types], [RFC2210], [RFC4920], [RFC5420],
[RFC7570], [RFC4859].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-rsvp-te@2020-03-09.yang"
module ietf-rsvp-te {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-rsvp-te";
prefix "rsvp-te";
import ietf-rsvp {
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
prefix rsvp;
reference "draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp: A YANG Data Model for
Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP)";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
reference "RFC8349: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management";
}
import ietf-routing-types {
prefix rt-types;
reference "RFC8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area";
}
import ietf-te {
prefix te;
reference "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te: A YANG Data Model for Traffic
Engineering Tunnels and Interfaces";
}
import ietf-te-device {
prefix te-dev;
reference "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te: A YANG Data Model for Traffic
Engineering Tunnels and Interfaces";
}
/* Import TE generic types */
import ietf-te-types {
prefix te-types;
reference "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types: A YANG Data Model for
Common Traffic Engineering Types";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix inet;
reference "RFC6991: Common YANG Data Types";
}
organization
"IETF Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling (TEAS)
Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/>
WG List: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
WG Chair: Lou Berger
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
<mailto:lberger@labn.net>
WG Chair: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
<mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net>
Editor: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
<mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net>
Editor: Tarek Saad
<mailto:tsaad.net@gmail.com>
Editor: Rakesh Gandhi
<mailto:rgandhi@cisco.com>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Igor Bryskin
<mailto:Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
Editor: Himanshu Shah
<mailto:hshah@ciena.com>";
description
"This module contains the RSVP-TE YANG generic data model.
The model fully conforms to the Network Management Datastore
Architecture (NMDA).
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note.
// RFC Ed.: update the date below with the date of RFC publication
// and remove this note.
revision "2020-03-09" {
description "A YANG Data Model for RSVP-TE";
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
reference
"RFCXXXX: A YANG Data Model for RSVP-TE Protocol";
}
identity rsvp-message-type {
description "RSVP message types";
}
identity rsvp-message-path {
base rsvp-message-type;
description "RSVP Path message";
reference "RFC2205";
}
identity rsvp-message-resv {
base rsvp-message-type;
description "RSVP Resv message";
reference "RFC2205";
}
identity rsvp-message-path-err {
base rsvp-message-type;
description "RSVP Path-Err message";
reference "RFC2205";
}
identity rsvp-message-resv-err {
base rsvp-message-type;
description "RSVP Resv-Err message";
reference "RFC2205";
}
identity rsvp-message-path-tear {
base rsvp-message-type;
description "RSVP Path Tear message";
reference "RFC2205";
}
identity rsvp-message-resv-conf {
base rsvp-message-type;
description "RSVP Resv Confirm message";
reference "RFC2205";
}
identity rsvp-message-srefresh {
base rsvp-message-type;
description "RSVP SRefresh message";
reference "RFC2961";
}
identity rsvp-message-hello {
base rsvp-message-type;
description "RSVP Hello message";
reference "RFC3209";
}
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
identity rsvp-message-bundle {
base rsvp-message-type;
description "RSVP Bundle message";
reference "RFC2961";
}
identity rsvp-message-notify {
base rsvp-message-type;
description "RSVP Notify message";
reference "RFC3473";
}
/**
* RSVP-TE LSPs groupings.
*/
grouping lsp-record-route-information-state {
description "recorded route information grouping";
container incoming-record-route-subobjects {
description "RSVP recorded route object incoming information";
list incoming-record-route-subobject {
when "../../te:origin-type != 'ingress'" {
description "Applicable on non-ingress LSPs only";
}
key "index";
ordered-by user;
description
"List of RSVP Path record-route objects";
uses te-types:record-route-state;
}
}
container outgoing-record-route-subobjects {
description "RSVP recorded route object outgoing information";
list outgoing-record-route-subobject {
when "../../te:origin-type != 'egress'" {
description "Applicable on non-egress LSPs only";
}
key "index";
ordered-by user;
description
"List of RSVP Resv record-route objects";
uses te-types:record-route-state;
}
}
}
grouping lsp-explicit-route-information-state {
description "RSVP-TE LSP explicit-route information";
container explicit-route-objects {
description "Explicit route object information";
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
list incoming-explicit-route-hop {
when "../../te:origin-type != 'ingress'" {
description "Applicable on non-ingress LSPs only";
}
key "index";
ordered-by user;
description
"List of incoming RSVP Path explicit-route objects";
leaf index {
type uint32;
description
"Explicit route hop index. The index is used to
identify an entry in the list. The order of entries
is defined by the user without relying on key values";
}
uses te-types:explicit-route-hop;
}
list outgoing-explicit-route-hop {
when "../../te:origin-type != 'egress'" {
description "Applicable on non-egress LSPs only";
}
key "index";
ordered-by user;
description
"List of outgoing RSVP Path explicit-route objects";
leaf index {
type uint32;
description
"Explicit route hop index. The index is used to
identify an entry in the list. The order of entries
is defined by the user without relying on key values";
}
uses te-types:explicit-route-hop;
}
}
}
grouping lsp-attributes-flags-config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to RSVP-TE LSP
attribute flags";
leaf-list lsp-attribute {
type identityref {
base te-types:lsp-attributes-flags;
}
description "RSVP per LSP attributes flags";
reference
"RFC4920, RFC5420, RFC7570";
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
}
}
grouping lsp-session-attributes-obj-flags-config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to RSVP-TE LSP
session attribute flags";
reference
"RFC4859: Registry for RSVP-TE Session Flags";
leaf-list session-attribute {
when "../session-attribute !=
'te-types:bandwidth-protection-desired' or
../session-attribute !=
'te-types:soft-preemption-desired'";
type identityref {
base te-types:session-attributes-flags;
}
description "RSVP session attributes flags";
reference
"RFC4859: Registry for RSVP-TE Session Flags";
}
}
grouping lsp-properties-config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to RSVP-TE LSP
session attribute flags";
leaf lsp-signaled-name {
type string;
description
"Sets the session name to use in the session
attribute object.";
}
uses lsp-session-attributes-obj-flags-config;
uses lsp-attributes-flags-config;
}
grouping tunnel-properties-config {
description "RSVP-TE Tunnel properties grouping";
leaf retry-timer {
type uint16 {
range 1..600;
}
units seconds;
description
"sets the time between attempts to establish the
LSP";
}
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
}
/*** End of RSVP-TE LSP groupings ***/
/**
* RSVP-TE generic global properties.
*/
grouping global-soft-preemption-config {
description
"Configuration for global RSVP-TE soft preemption";
leaf soft-preemption-timeout {
type uint16 {
range 0..300;
}
default 0;
description
"Timeout value for soft preemption to revert
to hard preemption";
}
}
grouping global-soft-preemption {
description
"Top level group for RSVP-TE soft-preemption";
container global-soft-preemption {
presence "Enables soft preemption on a node.";
description
"Top level container for RSVP-TE soft-preemption";
uses global-soft-preemption-config;
}
}
/*** End of RSVP-TE generic global properties. ***/
/**
* RSVP-TE interface generic groupings.
*/
grouping rsvp-te-interface-attributes {
description
"Top level grouping for RSVP-TE interface properties.";
container rsvp-te-interface-attributes {
description
"Top level container for RSVP-TE interface
properties";
container state {
config false;
description
"State information associated with RSVP-TE
bandwidth";
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
}
}
}
/*** End of RSVP-TE generic groupings ***/
/* RSVP-TE global properties */
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:globals" {
description
"RSVP-TE augmentation to RSVP globals";
uses global-soft-preemption;
}
/* Linkage to the base RSVP all links */
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:interfaces" {
description
"RSVP-TE generic data augmentation pertaining to interfaces";
uses rsvp-te-interface-attributes;
}
/* Linkage to per RSVP interface */
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:interfaces/" +
"rsvp:interface" {
description
"RSVP-TE generic data augmentation pertaining to specific
interface";
uses rsvp-te-interface-attributes;
}
/* add augmentation for sessions and neighbors */
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:globals/"
+ "rsvp:sessions" {
description
"RSVP-TE generic data augmentation pertaining to session";
list session-te {
key "tunnel-endpoint tunnel-id extended-tunnel-id";
config false;
description
"List of RSVP sessions";
leaf tunnel-endpoint {
type inet:ip-address;
description "XX";
}
leaf tunnel-id {
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
type uint16;
description "XX";
}
leaf extended-tunnel-id {
type inet:ip-address;
description "XX";
}
uses rsvp:session-attributes-state;
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:globals/"
+ "rsvp:sessions/session-te/psbs/psb" {
description
"RSVP-TE generic data augmentation pertaining to session";
/* To be added */
leaf tspec-average-rate {
type rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32;
units "Bytes per second";
description "Tspec Token Bucket Average Rate";
reference "RFC2210: RSVP with INTSERV";
}
leaf tspec-size {
type rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32;
units "Bytes per second";
description "Tspec Token Bucket Burst Rate";
reference "RFC2210";
}
leaf tspec-peak-rate {
type rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32;
units "Bytes per second";
description "Tspec Token Bucket Peak Data Rate";
reference "RFC2210";
}
leaf min-policed-unit {
type uint32;
description "Tspec Minimum Policed Unit";
reference "RFC2210";
}
leaf max-packet-size {
type uint32;
description "Tspec Maximum Packet Size";
reference "RFC2210";
}
}
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:globals/"
+ "rsvp:sessions/session-te/rsbs/rsb" {
description
"RSVP-TE generic data augmentation pertaining to session";
leaf fspec-average-rate {
type rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32;
units "Bytes per second";
description "Fspec Token Bucket Average Rate";
reference "RFC2210";
}
leaf fspec-size {
type rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32;
units "Bytes per second";
description "Fspec Token Bucket Burst Rate";
reference "RFC2210";
}
leaf fspec-peak-rate {
type rt-types:bandwidth-ieee-float32;
units "Bytes per second";
description "Fspec Token Bucket Peak Data Rate";
reference "RFC2210";
}
leaf min-policed-unit {
type uint32;
description "Fspec Minimum Policed Unit";
reference "RFC2210";
}
leaf max-packet-size {
type uint32;
description "Fspec Maximum Packet Size";
reference "RFC2210";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:neighbors" {
description
"RSVP-TE generic data augmentation pertaining to neighbors";
/* To be added */
}
/**
* RSVP-TE generic augmentations of generic TE model.
*/
/* TE tunnel augmentation */
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel" {
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
when "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel" +
"/te:primary-paths/te:primary-path" +
"/te:signaling-type = 'te-types:path-setup-rsvp'" {
description
"When the path signaling protocol is RSVP-TE ";
}
description
"RSVP-TE generic data augmentation pertaining to TE tunnels";
uses lsp-properties-config;
uses tunnel-properties-config;
}
/* TE LSP augmentation */
grouping rsvp-te-lsp-error-info {
description
"Grouping for RSVP-TE error reporting information";
leaf rsvp-message-type {
type identityref {
base rsvp-message-type;
}
description
"The RSVP message type that delivered the error";
}
leaf rsvp-error-code {
type uint8;
description "RSVP error code";
reference "RFC2205";
}
leaf rsvp-error-subcode {
type uint16;
description "RSVP Error sub-codes";
reference "RFC2205";
}
}
grouping rsvp-te-lsp-properties {
description "RSVP-TE LSP properties grouping";
leaf associated-rsvp-session {
type leafref {
path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:globals/"
+ "rsvp:sessions/session-te/tunnel-id";
}
config false;
description
"If the signalling protocol specified for this path is
RSVP-TE, this leaf provides a reference to the associated
session within the RSVP-TE protocol sessions list, such
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
that details of the signaling can be retrieved.";
}
uses lsp-properties-config;
uses lsp-explicit-route-information-state;
uses lsp-record-route-information-state;
}
augment "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp" {
when "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp" +
"/te:signaling-type = 'te-types:path-setup-rsvp'" {
description
"When the signaling protocol is RSVP-TE ";
}
description
"RSVP-TE generic data augmentation pertaining to specific TE
LSP";
uses rsvp-te-lsp-properties;
}
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths" +
"/te:primary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp" {
when "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths" +
"/te:primary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp" +
"/te:signaling-type = 'te-types:path-setup-rsvp'" {
description
"When the signaling protocol is RSVP-TE ";
}
description
"RSVP-TE generic data augmentation pertaining to specific TE
LSP";
uses rsvp-te-lsp-properties;
}
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths" +
"/te:primary-path" +
"/te:lsp-provisioning-error-infos" +
"/te:lsp-provisioning-error-info" {
description
"Augmentation for RSVP-TE per LSP error reason";
uses rsvp-te-lsp-error-info;
}
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths" +
"/te:primary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp" +
"/te:lsp-provisioning-error-infos" +
"/te:lsp-provisioning-error-info" {
when "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths" +
"/te:primary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp" +
"/te:signaling-type = 'te-types:path-setup-rsvp'" {
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
description
"When the signaling protocol is RSVP-TE ";
}
description
"Augmentation for RSVP-TE per path error reason";
uses rsvp-te-lsp-error-info;
}
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:secondary-paths" +
"/te:secondary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp" {
when "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:secondary-paths" +
"/te:secondary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp" +
"/te:signaling-type = 'te-types:path-setup-rsvp'" {
description
"When the signaling protocol is RSVP-TE ";
}
description
"RSVP-TE generic data augmentation pertaining to specific TE
LSP";
uses rsvp-te-lsp-properties;
}
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:secondary-paths" +
"/te:secondary-path" +
"/te:lsp-provisioning-error-infos" +
"/te:lsp-provisioning-error-info" {
description
"Augmentation for RSVP-TE per path error reason";
uses rsvp-te-lsp-error-info;
}
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:secondary-paths" +
"/te:secondary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp" +
"/te:lsp-provisioning-error-infos" +
"/te:lsp-provisioning-error-info" {
when "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:secondary-paths" +
"/te:secondary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp" +
"/te:signaling-type = 'te-types:path-setup-rsvp'" {
description
"When the signaling protocol is RSVP-TE ";
}
description
"Augmentation for RSVP-TE per LSP error reason";
uses rsvp-te-lsp-error-info;
}
/* TE interface augmentation */
augment "/te:te/te-dev:interfaces/te-dev:interface" {
description
"RSVP-TE generic data augmentation pertaining to specific TE
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
interface";
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Figure 4: RSVP TE generic YANG module
2.3.2. RSVP-TE MPLS YANG Module
The RSVP-TE MPLS YANG module "ietf-rsvp-te-mpls" imports the
following module(s):
o ietf-rsvp defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-rsvp]
o ietf-routing-types defined in [RFC8294]
o ietf-te-mpls-types defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types]
o ietf-te and ietf-te-dev defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]
This module references the following documents:
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-rsvp], [RFC8349], [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types],
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te], [RFC3209].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-rsvp-te-mpls@2020-03-09.yang"
module ietf-rsvp-te-mpls {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-rsvp-te-mpls";
prefix "rsvp-te-mpls";
import ietf-rsvp {
prefix "rsvp";
reference "draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp: A YANG Data Model for
Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP)";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
reference "RFC8349: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management";
}
import ietf-te-packet-types {
prefix "te-packet-types";
reference "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types: A YANG Data Model for
Common Traffic Engineering Types";
}
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
import ietf-te-types {
prefix "te-types";
reference "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types: A YANG Data Model for
Common Traffic Engineering Types";
}
import ietf-te {
prefix "te";
reference "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te: A YANG Data Model for Traffic
Engineering Tunnels and Interfaces";
}
import ietf-te-device {
prefix "te-dev";
reference "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te: A YANG Data Model for Traffic
Engineering Tunnels and Interfaces";
}
organization
"IETF Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling (TEAS)
Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/>
WG List: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
WG Chair: Lou Berger
<mailto:lberger@labn.net>
WG Chair: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
<mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net>
Editor: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
<mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net>
Editor: Tarek Saad
<mailto:tsaad.net@gmail.com>
Editor: Rakesh Gandhi
<mailto:rgandhi@cisco.com>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Igor Bryskin
<mailto:Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
Editor: Himanshu Shah
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
<mailto:hshah@ciena.com>";
description
"Latest update to MPLS RSVP-TE YANG data model.
The model fully conforms to the Network Management Datastore
Architecture (NMDA).
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note.
// RFC Ed.: update the date below with the date of RFC publication
// and remove this note.
revision "2020-03-09" {
description "Update to MPLS RSVP-TE YANG initial revision.";
reference
"RFCXXXX: A YANG Data Model for RSVP-TE Protocol";
}
/* RSVP-TE MPLS LSPs groupings */
grouping lsp-attributes-flags-mpls-config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to RSVP-TE MPLS LSP
attribute flags";
}
grouping lsp-session-attributes-obj-flags-mpls-config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to RSVP-TE MPLS LSP
session attribute flags";
reference
"RFC4859: Registry for RSVP-TE Session Flags";
leaf-list session-attribute {
when "../session-attribute =
'te-types:bandwidth-protection-desired' or
../session-attribute =
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
'te-types:soft-preemption-desired'";
type identityref {
base te-types:session-attributes-flags;
}
description "RSVP session attributes flags";
reference
"RFC4859: Registry for RSVP-TE Session Flags";
}
}
grouping tunnel-properties-mpls-config {
description
"Top level grouping for LSP properties.";
uses lsp-session-attributes-obj-flags-mpls-config;
uses lsp-attributes-flags-mpls-config;
}
grouping lsp-properties-mpls {
description
"Top level grouping for LSP properties.";
uses lsp-session-attributes-obj-flags-mpls-config;
uses lsp-attributes-flags-mpls-config;
}
/* End of RSVP-TE MPLS LSPs groupings */
/* MPLS RSVP-TE interface groupings */
grouping rsvp-te-interface-state {
description
"The RSVP-TE interface state grouping";
leaf over-subscribed-bandwidth {
type te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps;
description
"The amount of over-subscribed bandwidth on
the interface";
}
}
grouping rsvp-te-interface-softpreemption-state {
description
"The RSVP-TE interface preeemptions state grouping";
container interface-softpreemption-state {
description
"The RSVP-TE interface preeemptions state grouping";
leaf soft-preempted-bandwidth {
type te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps;
description
"The amount of soft-preempted bandwidth on
this interface";
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
}
list lsps {
key
"source destination tunnel-id lsp-id "+
"extended-tunnel-id";
description
"List of LSPs that are soft-preempted";
leaf source {
type leafref {
path "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp/"+
"te:source";
}
description
"Tunnel sender address extracted from
SENDER_TEMPLATE object";
reference "RFC3209";
}
leaf destination {
type leafref {
path "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp/"+
"te:destination";
}
description
"Tunnel endpoint address extracted from
SESSION object";
reference "RFC3209";
}
leaf tunnel-id {
type leafref {
path "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp/"+
"te:tunnel-id";
}
description
"Tunnel identifier used in the SESSION
that remains constant over the life
of the tunnel.";
reference "RFC3209";
}
leaf lsp-id {
type leafref {
path "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp/"+
"te:lsp-id";
}
description
"Identifier used in the SENDER_TEMPLATE
and the FILTER_SPEC that can be changed
to allow a sender to share resources with
itself.";
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
reference "RFC3209";
}
leaf extended-tunnel-id {
type leafref {
path "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp/"+
"te:extended-tunnel-id";
}
description
"Extended Tunnel ID of the LSP.";
reference "RFC3209";
}
leaf type {
type leafref {
path "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp/"+
"te:type";
}
description "LSP type P2P or P2MP";
}
}
}
}
grouping bandwidth-mpls-constraints {
description "Bandwidth constraints.";
container bandwidth-mpls-constraints {
description
"Holds the bandwidth constraints properties";
leaf maximum-reservable {
type te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps;
description
"The maximum reservable bandwidth on the
interface in kbps";
}
leaf-list bc-value {
type uint32 {
range "0..4294967295";
}
max-elements 8;
description
"The bandwidth constraint type";
}
}
}
grouping bandwidth-constraint-values {
description
"Packet bandwidth contraints values";
choice value-type {
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
description
"Value representation";
case percentages {
container perc-values {
uses bandwidth-mpls-constraints;
description
"Percentage values";
}
}
case absolutes {
container abs-values {
uses bandwidth-mpls-constraints;
description
"Absolute values";
}
}
}
}
grouping bandwidth-mpls-reservable-config {
description
"Interface bandwidth reservable configuration grouping";
choice bandwidth-value {
description "Reservable bandwidth configuration choice";
case absolute {
leaf absolute-value {
type te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps;
description "Absolute value of the bandwidth";
}
}
case percentage {
leaf percent-value {
type uint32 {
range "0..4294967295";
}
description "Percentage reservable bandwidth";
}
description
"The maximum reservable bandwidth on the
interface";
}
}
choice bc-model-type {
description
"Reservable bandwidth percentage capacity
values.";
case bc-model-rdm {
container bc-model-rdm {
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
description
"Russian Doll Model Bandwidth Constraints.";
uses bandwidth-mpls-constraints;
}
}
case bc-model-mam {
container bc-model-mam {
uses bandwidth-mpls-constraints;
description
"Maximum Allocation Model Bandwidth
Constraints.";
}
}
case bc-model-mar {
container bc-model-mar {
uses bandwidth-mpls-constraints;
description
"Maximum Allocation with Reservation Model
Bandwidth Constraints.";
}
}
}
}
grouping bandwidth-mpls-reservable {
description
"Packet reservable bandwidth";
container bandwidth-mpls-reservable {
description
"Interface bandwidth reservable container";
uses bandwidth-mpls-reservable-config;
}
}
/* End of RSVP-TE interface groupings */
/* RSVP-TE FRR groupings */
grouping rsvp-te-frr-auto-tunnel-backup-config {
description
"Auto-tunnel backup configuration grouping";
leaf auto-backup-protection {
type identityref {
base te-packet-types:backup-protection-type;
}
default
te-packet-types:backup-protection-node-link;
description
"Describes whether the backup should offer
protection against link, node, or either";
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
}
leaf auto-backup-path-computation {
type identityref {
base
te-types:path-computation-srlg-type;
}
description
"FRR backup computation type";
}
}
grouping rsvp-te-frr-backups-config {
description
"Top level container for RSVP-TE FRR backup parameters";
choice type {
description
"FRR backup tunnel type";
case static-tunnel {
container static-backups {
description "List of static backups";
list static-backup {
key "backup-tunnel-name";
description
"List of static backup tunnels that
protect the RSVP-TE interface.";
leaf backup-tunnel-name {
type leafref {
path "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:name";
}
description "FRR Backup tunnel name";
}
}
}
}
case auto-tunnel {
container auto-tunnel-backups {
description "Auto-tunnel choice";
uses rsvp-te-frr-auto-tunnel-backup-config;
}
}
}
}
grouping rsvp-te-frr-backups {
description
"RSVP-TE facility backup grouping";
container rsvp-te-frr-backups {
description
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
"RSVP-TE facility backup properties";
uses rsvp-te-frr-backups-config;
}
}
grouping lsp-backup-info-state {
description "LSP backup information grouping";
leaf backup-tunnel-name {
type string;
description
"If an LSP has an FRR backup LSP that can protect it,
this field identifies the tunnel name of the backup LSP.
Otherwise, this field is empty.";
}
leaf backup-frr-on {
type uint8;
description
"Whether currently this backup is carrying traffic";
}
leaf backup-protected-lsp-num {
type uint32;
description
"Number of LSPs protected by this backup";
}
}
grouping lsp-backup-info {
description "Backup/bypass LSP related information";
container backup-info {
description
"backup information";
uses lsp-backup-info-state;
}
}
grouping fast-reroute-local-revertive-config {
description "RSVP-TE FRR local revertive grouping";
leaf rsvp-frr-local-revert-delay {
type uint32;
description
"Time to wait after primary link is restored
before node attempts local revertive
procedures.";
}
}
/*** End of RSVP-TE FRR backup information ***/
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
grouping fast-reroute-local-revertive {
description
"Top level grouping for globals properties";
container fast-reroute-local-revertive {
description "RSVP-TE FRR local revertive container";
uses fast-reroute-local-revertive-config;
}
}
/* RSVP-TE global properties */
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp" {
description
"RSVP-TE augmentation to RSVP globals";
uses fast-reroute-local-revertive;
}
/* Linkage to the base RSVP all interfaces */
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:interfaces" {
description
"Augmentations for RSVP-TE MPLS all interfaces properties";
/* To be added */
}
/* Linkage to per RSVP interface */
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:interfaces/" +
"rsvp:interface" {
description
"Augmentations for RSVP-TE MPLS per interface properties";
/* To be added */
}
/* add augmentation for sessions neighbors */
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:globals/"
+ "rsvp:sessions" {
description
"Augmentation for RSVP-TE MPLS sessions";
/* To be added */
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:neighbors" {
description
"Augmentations for RSVP-TE MPLS neighbors properties";
/* To be added */
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
}
/**
* Augmentation to TE generic module
*/
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel" {
description
"Augmentations for RSVP-TE MPLS TE tunnel properties";
uses tunnel-properties-mpls-config;
}
augment "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp" {
when "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp" +
"/te:signaling-type = 'te-types:path-setup-rsvp'" {
description
"When the signaling protocol is RSVP-TE ";
}
description
"RSP-TE MPLS LSP state properties";
uses lsp-properties-mpls;
uses lsp-backup-info;
}
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:primary-paths" +
"/te:primary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp" {
when "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel" +
"/te:secondary-paths/te:secondary-path/" +
"te:signaling-type = 'te-types:path-setup-rsvp'" {
description
"When the signaling protocol is RSVP-TE ";
}
description
"RSVP-TE MPLS LSP state properties";
uses lsp-properties-mpls;
uses lsp-backup-info;
}
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:secondary-paths" +
"/te:secondary-path/te:lsps/te:lsp" {
when "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel" +
"/te:secondary-paths/te:secondary-path/" +
"te:signaling-type = 'te-types:path-setup-rsvp'" {
description
"When the signaling protocol is RSVP-TE ";
}
description
"RSVP-TE MPLS LSP state properties";
uses lsp-properties-mpls;
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
uses lsp-backup-info;
}
augment "/te:te/te-dev:interfaces/te-dev:interface" {
description
"RSVP reservable bandwidth configuration properties";
uses bandwidth-mpls-reservable;
}
augment "/te:te/te-dev:interfaces/te-dev:interface" {
description
"RSVP reservable bandwidth configuration properties";
uses rsvp-te-frr-backups;
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Figure 5: RSVP TE MPLS YANG module
3. IANA Considerations
This document registers the following URIs in the IETF XML registry
[RFC3688]. Following the format in [RFC3688], the following
registration is requested to be made.
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-rsvp-te
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-rsvp-te-mpls
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
This document registers two YANG modules in the YANG Module Names
registry [RFC6020].
name: ietf-rsvp
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-rsvp-te
prefix: ietf-rsvp
reference: RFCXXXX
name: ietf-rsvp-te
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-rsvp-te-mpls
prefix: ietf-rsvp-te
reference: RFCXXXX
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
4. Security Considerations
The YANG module defined in this memo is designed to be accessed via
the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the
secure transport layer and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is SSH [RFC6242]. The NETCONF access control model
[RFC8341] provides means to restrict access for particular NETCONF
users to a pre-configured subset of all available NETCONF protocol
operations and content.
There are a number of data nodes defined in the YANG module(s)
defined in this document which are writable/creatable/deletable
(i.e., config true, which is the default). These data nodes may be
considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments.
Write operations (e.g., <edit-config>) to these data nodes without
proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations.
/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/rt:control-plane-
protocol/rsvp:rsvp/globals: The data nodes defined defined in this
document and under this branch are applicable device-wide and can
affect all RSVP established sessions. Unauthorized access to this
container can potentially cause disruptive event(s) on all
established sessions.
/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/rt:control-plane-protocol/
rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:globals/rsvp:sessions: The data nodes defined in this
document and under this branch are applicable to one or all RSVP-TE
session(s). Unauthorized access to this container can potentially
affect the impacted RSVP session(s).
/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/rt:control-plane-
protocol/rsvp:rsvp/rsvp:interfaces: The data nodes defined defined in
this document and under this branch are applicable to one or all RSVP
interfaces. Unauthorized access to this container can potentially
affect established session(s) over impacted interface(s).
5. Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Lou Berger for reviewing and
providing valuable feedback on this document.
6. Contributors
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
Xia Chen
Huawei Technologies
Email: jescia.chenxia@huawei.com
Raqib Jones
Brocade
Email: raqib@Brocade.com
Bin Wen
Comcast
Email: Bin_Wen@cable.comcast.com
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-rsvp]
Beeram, V., Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., and I. Bryskin,
"A YANG Data Model for Resource Reservation Protocol
(RSVP)", draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-12 (work in progress),
January 2020.
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]
Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., and I. Bryskin,
"A YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering Tunnels and
Interfaces", draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-22 (work in
progress), November 2019.
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types]
Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., and I. Bryskin,
"Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types", draft-ietf-teas-
yang-te-types-13 (work in progress), November 2019.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC2205] Braden, R., Ed., Zhang, L., Berson, S., Herzog, S., and S.
Jamin, "Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1
Functional Specification", RFC 2205, DOI 10.17487/RFC2205,
September 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2205>.
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8294] Liu, X., Qu, Y., Lindem, A., Hopps, C., and L. Berger,
"Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area", RFC 8294,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8294, December 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8294>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
[RFC8349] Lhotka, L., Lindem, A., and Y. Qu, "A YANG Data Model for
Routing Management (NMDA Version)", RFC 8349,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8349, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8349>.
7.2. Informative References
[RFC2210] Wroclawski, J., "The Use of RSVP with IETF Integrated
Services", RFC 2210, DOI 10.17487/RFC2210, September 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2210>.
[RFC3209] Awduche, D., Berger, L., Gan, D., Li, T., Srinivasan, V.,
and G. Swallow, "RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP
Tunnels", RFC 3209, DOI 10.17487/RFC3209, December 2001,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3209>.
[RFC4859] Farrel, A., "Codepoint Registry for the Flags Field in the
Resource Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-
TE) Session Attribute Object", RFC 4859,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4859, April 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4859>.
[RFC4920] Farrel, A., Ed., Satyanarayana, A., Iwata, A., Fujita, N.,
and G. Ash, "Crankback Signaling Extensions for MPLS and
GMPLS RSVP-TE", RFC 4920, DOI 10.17487/RFC4920, July 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4920>.
[RFC5420] Farrel, A., Ed., Papadimitriou, D., Vasseur, JP., and A.
Ayyangarps, "Encoding of Attributes for MPLS LSP
Establishment Using Resource Reservation Protocol Traffic
Engineering (RSVP-TE)", RFC 5420, DOI 10.17487/RFC5420,
February 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5420>.
[RFC7570] Margaria, C., Ed., Martinelli, G., Balls, S., and B.
Wright, "Label Switched Path (LSP) Attribute in the
Explicit Route Object (ERO)", RFC 7570,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7570, July 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7570>.
Authors' Addresses
Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Juniper Networks
Email: vbeeram@juniper.net
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft RSVP-TE Protocol YANG Data Model March 2020
Tarek Saad
Juniper Networks
Email: tsaad@juniper.net
Rakesh Gandhi
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Email: rgandhi@cisco.com
Xufeng Liu
Volta Networks
Email: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com
Igor Bryskin
Huawei Technologies
Email: Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com
Himanshu Shah
Ciena
Email: hshah@ciena.com
Beeram, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 47]
