TEAS Working Group Xufeng Liu
Internet Draft Ericsson
Intended status: Standards Track Igor Bryskin
ADVA Optical Networking
Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Juniper Networks
Tarek Saad
Cisco Systems Inc
Himanshu Shah
Ciena
Oscar Gonzalez De Dios
Telefonica
Expires: January 6, 2016 July 6, 2015
YANG Data Model for TE Topologies
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-01
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as
reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 6, 2016.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this
document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in
Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without
warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model for representing, retrieving
and manipulating TE Topologies. The model serves as a base model
that other technology specific TE Topology models can augment.
Conventions used in this document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [RFC2119].
Table of Contents
1. Introduction...................................................3
1.1. Terminology...............................................3
1.2. Tree Structure - Legend...................................4
1.3. Prefixes in Data Node Names...............................4
2. Characterizing TE Topologies...................................5
3. Model Applicability............................................6
3.1. Native TE Topologies......................................6
3.2. Customized TE Topologies..................................8
4. Modeling Considerations.......................................10
4.1. Generic extensible Model.................................10
4.2. Model Structure..........................................10
4.3. Topology Identifiers.....................................11
4.4. Generic TE Link Attributes...............................12
4.5. Generic TE Node Attributes...............................12
4.6. TED Information Sources..................................13
4.7. Overlay/Underlay Relationship............................14
4.8. Scheduling Parameters....................................15
4.9. Templates................................................15
4.10. Notifications...........................................16
4.11. Open Items..............................................17
5. Tree Structure................................................17
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
6. TE Topology Yang Module.......................................42
7. Security Considerations.......................................78
8. IANA Considerations...........................................78
9. References....................................................78
9.1. Normative References.....................................78
9.2. Informative References...................................79
10. Acknowledgments..............................................79
1. Introduction
The Traffic Engineering Database (TED) is an essential component of
Traffic Engineered (TE) systems that are based on MPLS-TE [RFC2702]
and GMPLS [RFC3945]. The TED is a collection of all TE information
about all TE nodes and TE links in the network. The TE Topology is a
schematic arrangement of TE nodes and TE links present in a given
TED. There could be one or more TE Topologies present in a given
Traffic Engineered system. The TE Topology is the topology on which
path computational algorithms are run to compute Traffic Engineered
Paths (TE Paths).
This document defines a YANG [RFC6020] data model for representing
and manipulating TE Topologies. This model contains technology
agnostic TE Topology building blocks that can be augmented and used
by other technology-specific TE Topology models.
1.1. Terminology
TED: The Traffic Engineering Database is a collection of all TE
information about all TE nodes and TE links in a given network.
TE-Topology: The TE Topology is a schematic arrangement of TE nodes
and TE links in a given TED. It forms the basis for a graph suitable
for TE path computations.
Native TE Topology: Native TE Topology is a topology that is native
to a given provider network. This is the topology on which path
computational algorithms are run to compute TE Paths.
Customized TE Topology: Customized TE Topology is a custom topology
that is produced by a provider for a given Client. This topology
typically augments the Client's Native TE Topology. Path
computational algorithms aren't typically run on the Customized TE
Topology; they are run on the Client's augmented Native TE Topology.
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
1.2. Tree Structure - Legend
A simplified graphical representation of the data model is presented
in Section 5 of this document. The following notations are used for
the YANG model data tree representation.
<status> <flags> <name> <opts> <type>
<status> is one of:
+ for current
x for deprecated
o for obsolete
<flags> is one of:
rw for read-write configuration data
ro for read-only non-configuration data
-x for execution rpcs
-n for notifications
<name> is the name of the node
If the node is augmented into the tree from another module,
its name is printed as <prefix>:<name>
<opts> is one of:
? for an optional leaf or node
! for a presence container
* for a leaf-list or list
Brackets [<keys>] for a list's keys
Curly braces {<condition>} for optional feature that make
node conditional
Colon : for marking case nodes
Ellipses ("...") subtree contents not shown
Parentheses enclose choice and case nodes, and case nodes are
also marked with a colon (":").
<type> is the name of the type for leafs and leaf-lists.
1.3. Prefixes in Data Node Names
In this document, names of data nodes and other data model objects
are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the
corresponding YANG imported modules, as shown in Table 1.
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
+--------+-----------------+-----------+
| Prefix | YANG module | Reference |
+--------+-----------------+-----------+
| yang | ietf-yang-types | [RFC6991] |
| inet | ietf-inet-types | [RFC6991] |
+--------+-----------------+-----------+
Table 1: Prefixes and corresponding YANG modules
2. Characterizing TE Topologies
The data model proposed by this document takes the following
characteristics of TE Topologies into account:
- TE Topology is an abstract control-plane representation of the
data-plane topology. Hence attributes specific to the data-plane
must make their way into the corresponding TE Topology modeling.
The TE Topology comprises of dynamic auto-discovered data (data
that may change frequently - example: unreserved bandwidth
available on data-plane links) as well as fairly static data (data
that rarely changes- examples: layer network identification,
switching and adaptation capabilities and limitations, fate
sharing, administrative colors) associated with data-plane nodes
and links. It is possible for a single TE Topology to encompass TE
information at multiple switching layers.
- TE Topologies are protocol independent. Information about
topological elements may be learnt via link-state protocols, but
the topology can exist without being dependent on any particular
protocol.
- TE Topology may not be congruent to the routing topology (topology
constructed based on routing adjacencies) in a given TE System.
There isn't always a one-to-one association between a TE-link and
a routing adjacency. For example, the presence of a TE link
between a pair of nodes doesn't necessarily imply the existence of
a routing-adjacency between these nodes.
- Each TE Topological element has an information source associated
with it. In some scenarios, there could be more than one
information source associated with each topological element.
- TE Topologies can be hierarchical. Each node and link of a given
TE Topology can be associated with respective underlay topology.
This means that each node and link of a given TE Topology can be
associated with an independent stack of supporting TE Topologies.
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
- TE Topologies can be customized. TE topologies of a given network
presented by the network provider to its client could be
customized on per-client request basis. This customization could
be performed by provider, by client or by provider/client
negotiation. The relationship between a customized topology (as
presented to the client) and provider's native topology (as known
in its entirety to the provider itself) could be captured as
hierarchical (overlay-underlay), but otherwise the two topologies
are decoupled from each other.
3. Model Applicability
3.1. Native TE Topologies
The model discussed in this draft can be used to represent and
retrieve native TE topologies on a given TE system.
+---+ +---+ +---+ +---+ +---+
| R1|-------| R2|--------| R3|---------| R4|---------| R5|
+---+ +---+ +---+ +---+ +---+
| / \ / \ /
| / \ / \ /
| / \ / \ /
| / \ / \ /
| / \ / \ /
+---+ +---+ +---+ +---+
| R6|-------------| R7| | R8|---------| R9|
+---+ +---+ +---+ +---+
Figure 1a: Example Network Topology
---------------
| Native | | [ ] TE Node
| TE-Topology | | +++ TE Link
--------------- o--------------
__________________
[R1] ++++ [R2] ++++ [R3] ++++ [R4] ++++ [R5]
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + ++ ++
[R6] +++++++++ [R7] [R8] ++++ [R9]
Figure 1b: Native TE Topology as seen on Node R3
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
Consider the network topology depicted in Figure 1a (R1 .. R9 are
nodes representing routers). An implementation MAY choose to
construct a native TE Topology using all nodes and links present in
the given TED as depicted in Figure 1b. The data model proposed in
this document can be used to retrieve/represent this TE topology.
:
TE info distributed via ISIS-TE : TE info distributed via OSPF-TE
:
+---+ +---+ +---+ +---+ +---+
| R1|-------| R2|--------| R3|---------| R4|---------| R5|
+---+ +---+ +---+ +---+ +---+
| / : \ / \ /
| / : \ / \ /
| / : \ / \ /
| / : \ / \ /
| / : \ / \ /
+---+ +---+ : +---+ +---+
| R6|-------------| R7| : | R8|---------| R9|
+---+ +---+ : +---+ +---+
:
Figure 2a: Example Network Topology
----------------------- : -----------------------
|Native TE Topology | : |Native TE Topology |
|Info-Source: ISIS-TE | : |Info-Source: OSPF-TE |
----------------------- : -----------------------
:
[R1] ++++ [R2] ++++ [R3] : [R3'] ++++ [R4] ++++ [R5]
+ + : + + + +
+ + : + + + +
+ + : ++ ++
[R6] +++++++++ [R7] : [R8] ++++ [R9]
Figure 2b: Native TE Topologies as seen on Node R3
Consider the case of the topology being split in a way that some
nodes participate in OSPF-TE while others participate in ISIS-TE
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
(Figure 2a). An implementation MAY choose to construct separate TE
Topologies based on the information source. The native TE Topologies
constructed using only nodes and links that were learnt via a
specific information source are depicted in Figure 2b. The data
model proposed in this document can be used to retrieve/represent
these TE topologies.
Similarly, the data model can be used to represent/retrieve a TE
Topology that is constructed using only nodes and links that belong
to a particular technology layer. The data model is flexible enough
to retrieve and represent many such native TE Topologies.
3.2. Customized TE Topologies
The model discussed in this draft can be used to represent, retrieve
and manipulate customized TE Topologies. The model allows the
provider to present the network in abstract TE Terms on a per client
basis. These customized topologies contain sufficient information
for the path computing client to select paths according to its
policies.
| +---+ /-\
| | | Router ( ) WDM
| +---+ Node \-/ node
|
o----------------------------_____
__
+---+ /-\ /-\ /-\ +---+
| R1|-------( A )--------( C )---------( E )---------| R3|
+---+ \-/ \-/ \-/ +---+
/ \ / \
/ \ / \
/ \ / \
/ \ / \
/ \ / \
+---+ /-\ /-\ /-\ +---+
| R2|---------( B )---------( D )---------( F )---------| R4|
+---+ \-/ \-/ \-/ +---+
Figure 3: Example packet optical topology
Consider the network topology depicted in Figure 3. This is a
typical packet optical transport deployment scenario where the WDM
layer network domain serves as a Server Network Domain providing
transport connectivity to the packet layer network Domain (Client
Network Domain). Nodes R1, R2, R3 and R4 are IP routers that are
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
connected to an Optical WDM transport network. A, B, C, D, E and F
are WDM nodes that constitute the Server Network Domain.
| ***** B-F WDM Path
| @@@@@ B-E WDM Path
| $$$$$ A-E WDM Path
o--------------------_
+---+ /-\ $$$$$$$$ /-\ $$$$$$$$$ /-\ +---+
| R1|-------( A )--------( C )---------( E )---------| R3|
+---+ \-/ @\-/ @@@@@@@@@ \-/ +---+
@/ \ / \
@/ \ / \
@/ \ / \
@/ \ / \
@/ \ / \
+---+ /-\ ********* /-\ ********* /-\ +---+
| R2|---------( B )---------( D )---------( F )---------| R4|
+---+ \-/ \-/ \-/ +---+
Figure 4a: Paths within the provider domain
++++++++ [A] ++++++++++++++++++++ [E] +++++++++
+++++
++++
++++
++++
++++
++++++++ [B] ++++++++++++++++++++ [F] +++++++++
Figure 4b: Customized TE Topology provided to the Client
[R1] ++++++++ [A] ++++++++++++++++++++ [E] +++++++++ [R3]
+++++
++++
++++
++++
++++
[R2] ++++++++ [B] ++++++++++++++++++++ [F] +++++++++ [R4]
Figure 4c: Customized TE Topology merged with the Client's Native TE
Topology
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
The goal here is to augment the Client TE Topology with a customized
TE Topology provided by the WDM network. Given the availability of
the paths A-E, B-F and B-E (Figure 4a), a customized TE Topology as
depicted in Figure 4b is provided to the Client. This customized TE
Topology is merged with the Client's Native TE Topology and the
resulting topology is depicted in Figure 4c.
The data model proposed in this document can be used to
retrieve/represent/manipulate the customized TE Topology depicted in
Figure 4b.
4. Modeling Considerations
4.1. Generic extensible Model
The TE Topology model proposed in this document is meant to be
technology agnostic. Other technology specific TE Topology models
can augment and use the building blocks provided by the proposed
model.
+-------------------+
| Generic |
| TE Topology Model |
+-------------------+
|
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| | | |
V V V V
+------------+ +------------+
| Technology | | Technology |
| Specific | ...................... | Specific |
| TE Topology| | TE Topology|
| Model 1 | | Model n |
+------------+ +------------+
Figure 5: Extending the generic model
4.2. Model Structure
The high-level model structure proposed by this document is as shown
below:
+--rw te-topologies
| +--rw topology* [provider-id client-id te-topology-id]
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | ..........
| | +--rw node* [te-node-id]
| | | ..........
| | | +--rw te-link* [te-link-id]
| | | ..........
| | +--rw link* [source-te-node-id source-te-link-id dest-te-
node-id dest-te-link-id]
| | | ..........
| +--rw node-template* [name] {template}?
| | ..........
| +--rw link-template* [name] {template}?
| | ..........
+--ro te-topologies-state
+--ro topology* [provider-id client-id te-topology-id]
| ..........
+--ro node* [te-node-id]
| | ..........
| +--ro te-node-state
| ..........
+--ro link* [source-te-node-id source-te-link-id dest-te-
node-id dest-te-link-id]
| | ..........
| +--ro te-link-state
| ..........
notifications:
+---n te-node-event
| ..........
+---n te-link-event
..........
4.3. Topology Identifiers
The TE-Topology is uniquely identified by a key that has 3
constituents - te-topology-id, provider-id and client-id. The
combination of provider-id and te-topology-id uniquely identifies a
native TE Topology on a given provider. The client-id is used only
when Customized TE Topologies come into play; a value of "0" is used
as the client-id for native TE Topologies.
+--rw topology* [provider-id client-id te-topology-id]
| +--rw provider-id te-global-id
| +--rw client-id te-global-id
| +--rw te-topology-id te-topology-id
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
4.4. Generic TE Link Attributes
The model covers the definitions for generic TE Link attributes -
bandwidth, admin groups, SRLGs, switching capabilities, TE metric
extensions etc.
+--rw te-link-attributes
| ..........
| +--rw performance-metric-throttle {te-performance-metric}?
| | ..........
| +--rw administrative-group? te-types:admin-groups
| +--rw max-link-bandwidth? decimal64
| +--rw max-resv-link-bandwidth? decimal64
| +--rw unreserved-bandwidth* [priority]
| | ..........
| +--rw te-default-metric? uint32
| +--rw performance-metric {te-performance-metric}?
| | ..........
| +--rw link-protection-type? enumeration
| +--rw interface-switching-capabilities* [switching-capability]
| | ..........
| +--rw te-srlgs
| | ..........
4.5. Generic TE Node Attributes
The model covers the definitions for generic TE Node attributes. The
definition of a generic connectivity matrix is shown below:
+--rw te-node-attributes
| ..........
| +--rw connectivity-matrix* [id]
| +--rw id uint32
| +--rw from-link
| | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | +--rw node-ref? leafref
| | +--rw link-end-ref? leafref
| +--rw to-link
| | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | +--rw node-ref? leafref
| | +--rw link-end-ref? leafref
| +--rw is-allowed? Boolean
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
4.6. TED Information Sources
The model allows each TE topological element to have multiple TE
information sources (OSPF-TE, ISIS-TE, BGP-LS, User-Configured,
System-Processed, Other). Each information source is associated with
a credibility preference to indicate precedence. In scenarios where
a customized TE Topology is merged into a Client's native TE
Topology, the merged topological elements would point to the
corresponding customized TE Topology as its information source.
+--ro te-topologies-state
+--ro topology* [provider-id client-id te-topology-id]
| ..........
+--ro node* [te-node-id]
| ..........
| +--ro te-node-state
| +--ro information-source? enumeration
| +--ro information-source-state
| +--ro credibility-preference? uint16
| +--ro topology
| | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| +--ro routing-instance? string
+--ro te-topologies-state
+--ro topology* [provider-id client-id te-topology-id]
| ..........
+--ro link* [source-te-node-id source-te-link-id dest-te-
node-id dest-te-link-id]
| ..........
| +--ro te-link-state
| +--ro information-source? enumeration
| +--ro information-source-state
| | +--ro credibility-preference? uint16
| | +--ro topology
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro routing-instance? string
| +--ro alt-information-sources* [information-source]
| +--ro information-source
enumeration
| +--ro information-source-state
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | +--ro credibility-preference? uint16
| | +--ro topology
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro routing-instance? string
| | ..........
4.7. Overlay/Underlay Relationship
The model captures overlay and underlay relationship for TE
nodes/links. For example - in networks where multiple TE Topologies
are built hierarchically, this model allows the user to start from a
specific topological element in the top most topology and traverse
all the way down to the supporting topological elements in the
bottom most topology.
This relationship is captured via the "underlay-topology" field for
the node and via the "underlay" field for the link. The use of these
fields is optional and this functionality is tagged as a "feature"
("te-topology-hierarchy").
+--rw node* [te-node-id]
| ..........
| +--rw te-node-attributes
| | ..........
| | +--rw underlay-topology {te-topology-hierarchy}?
| | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
+--rw link* [source-te-node-id source-te-link-id dest-te-node-id
dest-te-link-id]
| ..........
| +--rw te-link-attributes
| | .......
| | +--rw underlay! {te-topology-hierarchy}?
| | | +--rw underlay-primary-path
| | | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw path-element* [path-element-id]
| | | | ..........
| | | +--rw underlay-backup-path* [index]
| | | | +--rw index uint32
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw path-element* [path-element-id]
| | | | ..........
| | | +--rw underlay-protection-type? uint16
| | | +--rw underlay-trail-src
| | | ..........
| | | +--rw underlay-trail-des
| | | ..........
4.8. Scheduling Parameters
The model allows time scheduling parameters to be specified for each
topological element or for the topology as a whole. These parameters
allow the provider to present different topological views to the
client at different time slots. The use of "scheduling parameters"
is optional and this functionality is tagged as a "feature"
("configuration-schedule"). [Editor's Note: The notion of
"scheduling parameters" has wider applicability. The expectation is
that this will eventually be discussed in a separate document.]
+--rw schedules* [schedule-id] {configuration-schedule}?
| +--rw schedule-id uint32
| +--rw start? yang:date-and-time
| +--rw schedule-duration? string
| +--rw repeat-interval? string
4.9. Templates
The data model provides the users with the ability to define
templates and apply them to link and node configurations. The use of
"template" configuration is optional and this functionality is
tagged as a "feature" ("template").
+--rw topology* [provider-id client-id te-topology-id]
| ...........
| +--rw node* [te-node-id]
| | +--rw te-node-template? leafref {template}?
| | ..........
| +--rw link* [source-te-node-id source-te-link-id dest-te-node-
id dest-te-link-id]
| +--rw te-link-template? leafref {template}?
| ..........
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
|
+--rw node-template* [name] {template}?
| +--rw name te-template-name
| +--rw priority? uint16
| +--rw reference-change-policy? enumeration
| +--rw te-node-template* leafref
| +--rw te-node-attributes
| ..........
+--rw link-template* [name] {template}?
+--rw name te-template-name
+--rw priority? uint16
+--rw reference-change-policy? enumeration
+--rw te-link-template* leafref
+--rw te-link-attributes
..........
A template can be constructed using multiple other templates. When
two or more templates specify values for the same configuration
field, the value from the template with the highest priority is
used. The reference-change-policy specifies the action that needs to
be taken when the template changes on a configuration node that has
a reference to this template. The choices of action include taking
no action, rejecting the change to the template and applying the
change to the corresponding configuration. [Editor's Note: The
notion of "templates" has wider applicability. It is possible for
this to be discussed in a separate document.]
4.10. Notifications
Notifications are a key component of any topology data model.
[YANG-PUSH] defines a subscription and push mechanism for YANG
datastores. This mechanism currently allows the user to:
- Subscribe notifications on a per client basis
- Specify subtree filters or xpath filters so that only interested
contents will be sent.
- Specify either periodic or on-demand notifications.
The authors would like to recommend the use of this mechanism for
the TE-Topology notifications. They would also like to suggest the
following extensions to [YANG-PUSH]
- Specify specific entities that will trigger the push
notifications. These entities can be specified by xpath, like the
way a filter is specified.
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
- Specify or limit the triggering event type, e.g. "add", "delete",
"modify", or "all". The system sends the push notifications only
when such events happen on the triggering entities.
- Have an option to request either "incremental" or "full"
notifications for an entity. For "incremental", the notification
will contain only the changed attributes.
4.11. Open Items
- Augmenting [YANG-NET-TOPO]: The generic network topology building
blocks are discussed in [YANG-NET-TOPO]. This version of the
document does not use any of those constructs. The next revision
of this document should augment these constructs.
- Coordinating changes to [YANG-PUSH]: The changes to [YANG-PUSH]
discussed in Section 4.10 will need to be coordinated with the
authors of that draft.
5. Tree Structure
module: ietf-te-topology
+--rw te-topologies
| +--rw topology* [provider-id client-id te-topology-id]
| | +--rw provider-id te-global-id
| | +--rw client-id te-global-id
| | +--rw te-topology-id te-topology-id
| | +--rw schedules* [schedule-id] {configuration-schedule}?
| | | +--rw schedule-id uint32
| | | +--rw start? yang:date-and-time
| | | +--rw schedule-duration? string
| | | +--rw repeat-interval? string
| | +--rw topology-types
| | | +--rw te-topology!
| | +--rw node* [te-node-id]
| | | +--rw te-node-id te-node-id
| | | +--rw te-node-template? leafref {template}?
| | | +--rw te-node-attributes
| | | | +--rw schedules* [schedule-id] {configuration-
schedule}?
| | | | | +--rw schedule-id uint32
| | | | | +--rw start? yang:date-and-time
| | | | | +--rw schedule-duration? string
| | | | | +--rw repeat-interval? string
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | | +--rw name? inet:domain-name
| | | | +--rw signaling-address* inet:ip-address
| | | | +--rw flag* flag-type
| | | | +--rw is-abstract? boolean
| | | | +--rw underlay-topology {te-topology-hierarchy}?
| | | | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw connectivity-matrix* [id]
| | | | +--rw id uint32
| | | | +--rw from-link
| | | | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | | | +--rw node-ref? leafref
| | | | | +--rw link-end-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw to-link
| | | | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | | | +--rw node-ref? leafref
| | | | | +--rw link-end-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw is-allowed? boolean
| | | +--rw te-link* [te-link-id]
| | | +--rw te-link-id te-link-id
| | | +--rw (stack-level)?
| | | +--:(bundle)
| | | | +--rw bundled-links
| | | | +--rw bundled-link* [sequence]
| | | | +--rw sequence uint32
| | | | +--rw te-link-ref? leafref
| | | +--:(component)
| | | +--rw component-links
| | | +--rw component-link* [sequence]
| | | +--rw sequence uint32
| | | +--rw component-link-ref? leafref
| | +--rw link* [source-te-node-id source-te-link-id dest-te-
node-id dest-te-link-id]
| | +--rw source-te-node-id leafref
| | +--rw source-te-link-id leafref
| | +--rw dest-te-node-id leafref
| | +--rw dest-te-link-id leafref
| | +--rw te-link-template? leafref {template}?
| | +--rw te-link-attributes
| | +--rw schedules* [schedule-id] {configuration-
schedule}?
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | +--rw schedule-id uint32
| | | +--rw start? yang:date-and-time
| | | +--rw schedule-duration? string
| | | +--rw repeat-interval? string
| | +--rw name? string
| | +--rw flag* flag-type
| | +--rw is-abstract? boolean
| | +--rw underlay! {te-topology-hierarchy}?
| | | +--rw underlay-primary-path
| | | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw path-element* [path-element-id]
| | | | +--rw path-element-id uint32
| | | | +--rw (type)?
| | | | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | | | +--rw v4-address? inet:ipv4-
address
| | | | | +--rw v4-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | | +--rw v4-loose? boolean
| | | | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | | | | +--rw v6-address? inet:ipv6-
address
| | | | | +--rw v6-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | | +--rw v6-loose? boolean
| | | | +--:(as-number)
| | | | | +--rw as-number? uint16
| | | | +--:(unnumbered-link)
| | | | | +--rw router-id? inet:ip-
address
| | | | | +--rw interface-id? uint32
| | | | +--:(label)
| | | | +--rw value? uint32
| | | +--rw underlay-backup-path* [index]
| | | | +--rw index uint32
| | | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw path-element* [path-element-id]
| | | | +--rw path-element-id uint32
| | | | +--rw (type)?
| | | | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | | | +--rw v4-address? inet:ipv4-
address
| | | | | +--rw v4-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | | +--rw v4-loose? boolean
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | | | | +--rw v6-address? inet:ipv6-
address
| | | | | +--rw v6-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | | +--rw v6-loose? boolean
| | | | +--:(as-number)
| | | | | +--rw as-number? uint16
| | | | +--:(unnumbered-link)
| | | | | +--rw router-id? inet:ip-
address
| | | | | +--rw interface-id? uint32
| | | | +--:(label)
| | | | +--rw value? uint32
| | | +--rw underlay-protection-type? uint16
| | | +--rw underlay-trail-src
| | | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw node-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw link-end-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw underlay-trail-des
| | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw node-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw link-end-ref? leafref
| | +--rw admin-status? enumeration
| | +--rw performance-metric-throttle {te-performance-
metric}?
| | | +--rw unidirectional-delay-offset?
uint32
| | | +--rw measure-interval?
uint32
| | | +--rw advertisement-interval?
uint32
| | | +--rw suppression-interval?
uint32
| | | +--rw threshold-out
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-delay?
uint32
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-min-delay?
uint32
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-max-delay?
uint32
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-delay-variation?
uint32
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--rw threshold-in
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-delay?
uint32
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-min-delay?
uint32
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-max-delay?
uint32
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-delay-variation?
uint32
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--rw threshold-accelerated-advertisement
| | | +--rw unidirectional-delay?
uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-min-delay?
uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-max-delay?
uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-delay-variation?
uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | | +--rw unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--rw unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--rw unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--rw link-index? uint64
| | +--rw administrative-group? te-
types:admin-groups
| | +--rw max-link-bandwidth? decimal64
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | +--rw max-resv-link-bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--rw unreserved-bandwidth* [priority]
| | | +--rw priority uint8
| | | +--rw bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--rw te-default-metric? uint32
| | +--rw performance-metric {te-performance-metric}?
| | | +--rw measurement
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-delay?
uint32
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-min-delay?
uint32
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-max-delay?
uint32
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-delay-variation?
uint32
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | | +--rw unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--rw normality
| | | +--rw unidirectional-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| | | +--rw unidirectional-min-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| | | +--rw unidirectional-max-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| | | +--rw unidirectional-delay-variation?
performance-metric-normality
| | | +--rw unidirectional-packet-loss?
performance-metric-normality
| | | +--rw unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| | | +--rw unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| | | +--rw unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--rw link-protection-type? enumeration
| | +--rw interface-switching-capabilities* [switching-
capability]
| | | +--rw switching-capability
identityref
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | +--rw encoding?
identityref
| | | +--rw max-lsp-bandwidth* [priority]
| | | | +--rw priority uint8
| | | | +--rw bandwidth? decimal64
| | | +--rw packet-switch-capable
| | | | +--rw minimum-lsp-bandwidth? decimal64
| | | | +--rw interface-mtu? uint16
| | | +--rw time-division-multiplex-capable
| | | +--rw minimum-lsp-bandwidth? decimal64
| | | +--rw indication? enumeration
| | +--rw te-srlgs
| | +--rw values* te-types:srlg
| +--rw node-template* [name] {template}?
| | +--rw name te-template-name
| | +--rw priority? uint16
| | +--rw reference-change-policy? enumeration
| | +--rw te-node-template* leafref
| | +--rw te-node-attributes
| | | +--rw schedules* [schedule-id] {configuration-schedule}?
| | | | +--rw schedule-id uint32
| | | | +--rw start? yang:date-and-time
| | | | +--rw schedule-duration? string
| | | | +--rw repeat-interval? string
| | | +--rw name? inet:domain-name
| | | +--rw signaling-address* inet:ip-address
| | | +--rw flag* flag-type
| | | +--rw is-abstract? boolean
| | | +--rw underlay-topology {te-topology-hierarchy}?
| | | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw connectivity-matrix* [id]
| | | +--rw id uint32
| | | +--rw from-link
| | | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw node-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw link-end-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw to-link
| | | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw node-ref? leafref
| | | | +--rw link-end-ref? leafref
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | +--rw is-allowed? boolean
| | +--rw te-link* [te-link-id]
| | +--rw te-link-id te-link-id
| | +--rw (stack-level)?
| | +--:(bundle)
| | | +--rw bundled-links
| | | +--rw bundled-link* [sequence]
| | | +--rw sequence uint32
| | | +--rw te-link-ref? leafref
| | +--:(component)
| | +--rw component-links
| | +--rw component-link* [sequence]
| | +--rw sequence uint32
| | +--rw component-link-ref? leafref
| +--rw link-template* [name] {template}?
| +--rw name te-template-name
| +--rw priority? uint16
| +--rw reference-change-policy? enumeration
| +--rw te-link-template* leafref
| +--rw te-link-attributes
| +--rw schedules* [schedule-id] {configuration-schedule}?
| | +--rw schedule-id uint32
| | +--rw start? yang:date-and-time
| | +--rw schedule-duration? string
| | +--rw repeat-interval? string
| +--rw name? string
| +--rw flag* flag-type
| +--rw is-abstract? boolean
| +--rw underlay! {te-topology-hierarchy}?
| | +--rw underlay-primary-path
| | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw path-element* [path-element-id]
| | | +--rw path-element-id uint32
| | | +--rw (type)?
| | | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | | +--rw v4-address? inet:ipv4-
address
| | | | +--rw v4-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | +--rw v4-loose? boolean
| | | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | | | +--rw v6-address? inet:ipv6-
address
| | | | +--rw v6-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | +--rw v6-loose? boolean
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | +--:(as-number)
| | | | +--rw as-number? uint16
| | | +--:(unnumbered-link)
| | | | +--rw router-id? inet:ip-address
| | | | +--rw interface-id? uint32
| | | +--:(label)
| | | +--rw value? uint32
| | +--rw underlay-backup-path* [index]
| | | +--rw index uint32
| | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw path-element* [path-element-id]
| | | +--rw path-element-id uint32
| | | +--rw (type)?
| | | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | | +--rw v4-address? inet:ipv4-
address
| | | | +--rw v4-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | +--rw v4-loose? boolean
| | | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | | | +--rw v6-address? inet:ipv6-
address
| | | | +--rw v6-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | +--rw v6-loose? boolean
| | | +--:(as-number)
| | | | +--rw as-number? uint16
| | | +--:(unnumbered-link)
| | | | +--rw router-id? inet:ip-address
| | | | +--rw interface-id? uint32
| | | +--:(label)
| | | +--rw value? uint32
| | +--rw underlay-protection-type? uint16
| | +--rw underlay-trail-src
| | | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw node-ref? leafref
| | | +--rw link-end-ref? leafref
| | +--rw underlay-trail-des
| | +--rw provider-id-ref? leafref
| | +--rw client-id-ref? leafref
| | +--rw topology-id-ref? leafref
| | +--rw node-ref? leafref
| | +--rw link-end-ref? leafref
| +--rw admin-status? enumeration
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| +--rw performance-metric-throttle {te-performance-
metric}?
| | +--rw unidirectional-delay-offset? uint32
| | +--rw measure-interval? uint32
| | +--rw advertisement-interval? uint32
| | +--rw suppression-interval? uint32
| | +--rw threshold-out
| | | +--rw unidirectional-delay? uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-min-delay? uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-max-delay? uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-delay-variation? uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | | +--rw unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--rw unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--rw unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--rw threshold-in
| | | +--rw unidirectional-delay? uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-min-delay? uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-max-delay? uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-delay-variation? uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | | +--rw unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--rw unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--rw unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--rw threshold-accelerated-advertisement
| | +--rw unidirectional-delay? uint32
| | +--rw unidirectional-min-delay? uint32
| | +--rw unidirectional-max-delay? uint32
| | +--rw unidirectional-delay-variation? uint32
| | +--rw unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | +--rw unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--rw unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--rw unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| +--rw link-index? uint64
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| +--rw administrative-group? te-
types:admin-groups
| +--rw max-link-bandwidth? decimal64
| +--rw max-resv-link-bandwidth? decimal64
| +--rw unreserved-bandwidth* [priority]
| | +--rw priority uint8
| | +--rw bandwidth? decimal64
| +--rw te-default-metric? uint32
| +--rw performance-metric {te-performance-metric}?
| | +--rw measurement
| | | +--rw unidirectional-delay? uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-min-delay? uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-max-delay? uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-delay-variation? uint32
| | | +--rw unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | | +--rw unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--rw unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--rw unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--rw normality
| | +--rw unidirectional-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--rw unidirectional-min-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--rw unidirectional-max-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--rw unidirectional-delay-variation?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--rw unidirectional-packet-loss?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--rw unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--rw unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--rw unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| +--rw link-protection-type? enumeration
| +--rw interface-switching-capabilities* [switching-
capability]
| | +--rw switching-capability identityref
| | +--rw encoding? identityref
| | +--rw max-lsp-bandwidth* [priority]
| | | +--rw priority uint8
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | +--rw bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--rw packet-switch-capable
| | | +--rw minimum-lsp-bandwidth? decimal64
| | | +--rw interface-mtu? uint16
| | +--rw time-division-multiplex-capable
| | +--rw minimum-lsp-bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--rw indication? enumeration
| +--rw te-srlgs
| +--rw values* te-types:srlg
+--ro te-topologies-state
+--ro topology* [provider-id client-id te-topology-id]
+--ro provider-id te-global-id
+--ro client-id te-global-id
+--ro te-topology-id te-topology-id
+--ro server-provided? boolean
+--ro topology-types
| +--ro te-topology!
+--ro node* [te-node-id]
| +--ro te-node-id te-node-id
| +--ro te-node-template? leafref {template}?
| +--ro te-node-attributes
| | +--ro schedules* [schedule-id] {configuration-
schedule}?
| | | +--ro schedule-id uint32
| | | +--ro start? yang:date-and-time
| | | +--ro schedule-duration? string
| | | +--ro repeat-interval? string
| | +--ro name? inet:domain-name
| | +--ro signaling-address* inet:ip-address
| | +--ro flag* flag-type
| | +--ro is-abstract? boolean
| | +--ro underlay-topology {te-topology-hierarchy}?
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro connectivity-matrix* [id]
| | +--ro id uint32
| | +--ro from-link
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro node-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro link-end-ref? leafref
| | +--ro to-link
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro node-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro link-end-ref? leafref
| | +--ro is-allowed? boolean
| +--ro te-link* [te-link-id]
| | +--ro te-link-id te-link-id
| | +--ro (stack-level)?
| | +--:(bundle)
| | | +--ro bundled-links
| | | +--ro bundled-link* [sequence]
| | | +--ro sequence uint32
| | | +--ro te-link-ref? leafref
| | +--:(component)
| | +--ro component-links
| | +--ro component-link* [sequence]
| | +--ro sequence uint32
| | +--ro component-link-ref? leafref
| +--ro te-node-state
| +--ro information-source? enumeration
| +--ro information-source-state
| +--ro credibility-preference? uint16
| +--ro topology
| | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| +--ro routing-instance? string
+--ro link* [source-te-node-id source-te-link-id dest-te-
node-id dest-te-link-id]
+--ro source-te-node-id leafref
+--ro source-te-link-id leafref
+--ro dest-te-node-id leafref
+--ro dest-te-link-id leafref
+--ro te-link-template? leafref {template}?
+--ro te-link-attributes
| +--ro schedules* [schedule-id] {configuration-
schedule}?
| | +--ro schedule-id uint32
| | +--ro start? yang:date-and-time
| | +--ro schedule-duration? string
| | +--ro repeat-interval? string
| +--ro name? string
| +--ro flag* flag-type
| +--ro is-abstract? boolean
| +--ro underlay! {te-topology-hierarchy}?
| | +--ro underlay-primary-path
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro path-element* [path-element-id]
| | | +--ro path-element-id uint32
| | | +--ro (type)?
| | | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | | +--ro v4-address? inet:ipv4-
address
| | | | +--ro v4-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | +--ro v4-loose? boolean
| | | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | | | +--ro v6-address? inet:ipv6-
address
| | | | +--ro v6-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | +--ro v6-loose? boolean
| | | +--:(as-number)
| | | | +--ro as-number? uint16
| | | +--:(unnumbered-link)
| | | | +--ro router-id? inet:ip-
address
| | | | +--ro interface-id? uint32
| | | +--:(label)
| | | +--ro value? uint32
| | +--ro underlay-backup-path* [index]
| | | +--ro index uint32
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro path-element* [path-element-id]
| | | +--ro path-element-id uint32
| | | +--ro (type)?
| | | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | | +--ro v4-address? inet:ipv4-
address
| | | | +--ro v4-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | +--ro v4-loose? boolean
| | | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | | | +--ro v6-address? inet:ipv6-
address
| | | | +--ro v6-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | +--ro v6-loose? boolean
| | | +--:(as-number)
| | | | +--ro as-number? uint16
| | | +--:(unnumbered-link)
| | | | +--ro router-id? inet:ip-
address
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | | +--ro interface-id? uint32
| | | +--:(label)
| | | +--ro value? uint32
| | +--ro underlay-protection-type? uint16
| | +--ro underlay-trail-src
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro node-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro link-end-ref? leafref
| | +--ro underlay-trail-des
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro node-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro link-end-ref? leafref
| | +--ro dynamic? boolean
| | +--ro committed? boolean
| +--ro admin-status? enumeration
| +--ro performance-metric-throttle {te-performance-
metric}?
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay-offset?
uint32
| | +--ro measure-interval?
uint32
| | +--ro advertisement-interval?
uint32
| | +--ro suppression-interval?
uint32
| | +--ro threshold-out
| | | +--ro unidirectional-delay?
uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-min-delay?
uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-max-delay?
uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation?
uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | +--ro threshold-in
| | | +--ro unidirectional-delay?
uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-min-delay?
uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-max-delay?
uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation?
uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--ro threshold-accelerated-advertisement
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay?
uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-min-delay?
uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-max-delay?
uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation?
uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| +--ro link-index? uint64
| +--ro administrative-group? te-
types:admin-groups
| +--ro max-link-bandwidth? decimal64
| +--ro max-resv-link-bandwidth? decimal64
| +--ro unreserved-bandwidth* [priority]
| | +--ro priority uint8
| | +--ro bandwidth? decimal64
| +--ro te-default-metric? uint32
| +--ro performance-metric {te-performance-metric}?
| | +--ro measurement
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | +--ro unidirectional-delay?
uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-min-delay?
uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-max-delay?
uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation?
uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--ro normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-min-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-max-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro link-protection-type? enumeration
| +--ro interface-switching-capabilities* [switching-
capability]
| | +--ro switching-capability
identityref
| | +--ro encoding?
identityref
| | +--ro max-lsp-bandwidth* [priority]
| | | +--ro priority uint8
| | | +--ro bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--ro packet-switch-capable
| | | +--ro minimum-lsp-bandwidth? decimal64
| | | +--ro interface-mtu? uint16
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | +--ro time-division-multiplex-capable
| | +--ro minimum-lsp-bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--ro indication? enumeration
| +--ro te-srlgs
| +--ro values* te-types:srlg
+--ro te-link-state
+--ro oper-status? enumeration
+--ro information-source? enumeration
+--ro information-source-state
| +--ro credibility-preference? uint16
| +--ro topology
| | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| +--ro routing-instance? string
+--ro alt-information-sources* [information-source]
+--ro information-source
enumeration
+--ro information-source-state
| +--ro credibility-preference? uint16
| +--ro topology
| | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| +--ro routing-instance? string
+--ro link-index? uint64
+--ro administrative-group? te-
types:admin-groups
+--ro max-link-bandwidth?
decimal64
+--ro max-resv-link-bandwidth?
decimal64
+--ro unreserved-bandwidth* [priority]
| +--ro priority uint8
| +--ro bandwidth? decimal64
+--ro te-default-metric? uint32
+--ro performance-metric {te-performance-metric}?
| +--ro measurement
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay?
uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-min-delay?
uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-max-delay?
uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation?
uint32
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| +--ro normality
| +--ro unidirectional-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-min-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-max-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
+--ro link-protection-type?
enumeration
+--ro interface-switching-capabilities*
[switching-capability]
| +--ro switching-capability
identityref
| +--ro encoding?
identityref
| +--ro max-lsp-bandwidth* [priority]
| | +--ro priority uint8
| | +--ro bandwidth? decimal64
| +--ro packet-switch-capable
| | +--ro minimum-lsp-bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--ro interface-mtu? uint16
| +--ro time-division-multiplex-capable
| +--ro minimum-lsp-bandwidth? decimal64
| +--ro indication? enumeration
+--ro te-srlgs
+--ro values* te-types:srlg
notifications:
+---n te-node-event
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| +--ro event-type? te-topology-event-type
| +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| +--ro node-ref? leafref
| +--ro te-topology!
| +--ro te-node-attributes
| | +--ro schedules* [schedule-id] {configuration-schedule}?
| | | +--ro schedule-id uint32
| | | +--ro start? yang:date-and-time
| | | +--ro schedule-duration? string
| | | +--ro repeat-interval? string
| | +--ro name? inet:domain-name
| | +--ro signaling-address* inet:ip-address
| | +--ro flag* flag-type
| | +--ro is-abstract? boolean
| | +--ro underlay-topology {te-topology-hierarchy}?
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro connectivity-matrix* [id]
| | +--ro id uint32
| | +--ro from-link
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro node-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro link-end-ref? leafref
| | +--ro to-link
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro node-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro link-end-ref? leafref
| | +--ro is-allowed? boolean
| +--ro te-link* [te-link-id]
| | +--ro te-link-id te-link-id
| | +--ro (stack-level)?
| | +--:(bundle)
| | | +--ro bundled-links
| | | +--ro bundled-link* [sequence]
| | | +--ro sequence uint32
| | | +--ro te-link-ref? leafref
| | +--:(component)
| | +--ro component-links
| | +--ro component-link* [sequence]
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | +--ro sequence uint32
| | +--ro component-link-ref? leafref
| +--ro te-node-state
| +--ro information-source? enumeration
| +--ro information-source-state
| +--ro credibility-preference? uint16
| +--ro topology
| | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| +--ro routing-instance? string
+---n te-link-event
+--ro event-type? te-topology-event-type
+--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
+--ro client-id-ref? leafref
+--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
+--ro source-te-node-id-ref? leafref
+--ro source-te-link-id-ref? leafref
+--ro dest-te-node-id-ref? leafref
+--ro dest-te-link-id-ref? leafref
+--ro te-topology!
+--ro te-link-attributes
| +--ro schedules* [schedule-id] {configuration-schedule}?
| | +--ro schedule-id uint32
| | +--ro start? yang:date-and-time
| | +--ro schedule-duration? string
| | +--ro repeat-interval? string
| +--ro name? string
| +--ro flag* flag-type
| +--ro is-abstract? boolean
| +--ro underlay! {te-topology-hierarchy}?
| | +--ro underlay-primary-path
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro path-element* [path-element-id]
| | | +--ro path-element-id uint32
| | | +--ro (type)?
| | | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | | +--ro v4-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--ro v4-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | +--ro v4-loose? boolean
| | | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | | | +--ro v6-address? inet:ipv6-address
| | | | +--ro v6-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | +--ro v6-loose? boolean
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | +--:(as-number)
| | | | +--ro as-number? uint16
| | | +--:(unnumbered-link)
| | | | +--ro router-id? inet:ip-address
| | | | +--ro interface-id? uint32
| | | +--:(label)
| | | +--ro value? uint32
| | +--ro underlay-backup-path* [index]
| | | +--ro index uint32
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro path-element* [path-element-id]
| | | +--ro path-element-id uint32
| | | +--ro (type)?
| | | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | | +--ro v4-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--ro v4-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | +--ro v4-loose? boolean
| | | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | | | +--ro v6-address? inet:ipv6-address
| | | | +--ro v6-prefix-length? uint8
| | | | +--ro v6-loose? boolean
| | | +--:(as-number)
| | | | +--ro as-number? uint16
| | | +--:(unnumbered-link)
| | | | +--ro router-id? inet:ip-address
| | | | +--ro interface-id? uint32
| | | +--:(label)
| | | +--ro value? uint32
| | +--ro underlay-protection-type? uint16
| | +--ro underlay-trail-src
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro node-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro link-end-ref? leafref
| | +--ro underlay-trail-des
| | | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro node-ref? leafref
| | | +--ro link-end-ref? leafref
| | +--ro dynamic? boolean
| | +--ro committed? boolean
| +--ro admin-status? enumeration
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| +--ro performance-metric-throttle {te-performance-metric}?
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay-offset? uint32
| | +--ro measure-interval? uint32
| | +--ro advertisement-interval? uint32
| | +--ro suppression-interval? uint32
| | +--ro threshold-out
| | | +--ro unidirectional-delay? uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-min-delay? uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-max-delay? uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation? uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss? decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth? decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth? decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--ro threshold-in
| | | +--ro unidirectional-delay? uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-min-delay? uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-max-delay? uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation? uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss? decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth? decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth? decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--ro threshold-accelerated-advertisement
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay? uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-min-delay? uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-max-delay? uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation? uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss? decimal64
| | +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth? decimal64
| +--ro link-index? uint64
| +--ro administrative-group? te-types:admin-
groups
| +--ro max-link-bandwidth? decimal64
| +--ro max-resv-link-bandwidth? decimal64
| +--ro unreserved-bandwidth* [priority]
| | +--ro priority uint8
| | +--ro bandwidth? decimal64
| +--ro te-default-metric? uint32
| +--ro performance-metric {te-performance-metric}?
| | +--ro measurement
| | | +--ro unidirectional-delay? uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-min-delay? uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-max-delay? uint32
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | | +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation? uint32
| | | +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss? decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth? decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth? decimal64
| | | +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--ro normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-min-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-max-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| | +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro link-protection-type? enumeration
| +--ro interface-switching-capabilities* [switching-
capability]
| | +--ro switching-capability identityref
| | +--ro encoding? identityref
| | +--ro max-lsp-bandwidth* [priority]
| | | +--ro priority uint8
| | | +--ro bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--ro packet-switch-capable
| | | +--ro minimum-lsp-bandwidth? decimal64
| | | +--ro interface-mtu? uint16
| | +--ro time-division-multiplex-capable
| | +--ro minimum-lsp-bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--ro indication? enumeration
| +--ro te-srlgs
| +--ro values* te-types:srlg
+--ro te-link-state
+--ro oper-status? enumeration
+--ro information-source? enumeration
+--ro information-source-state
| +--ro credibility-preference? uint16
| +--ro topology
| | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| +--ro routing-instance? string
+--ro alt-information-sources* [information-source]
+--ro information-source enumeration
+--ro information-source-state
| +--ro credibility-preference? uint16
| +--ro topology
| | +--ro provider-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro client-id-ref? leafref
| | +--ro topology-id-ref? leafref
| +--ro routing-instance? string
+--ro link-index? uint64
+--ro administrative-group? te-
types:admin-groups
+--ro max-link-bandwidth? decimal64
+--ro max-resv-link-bandwidth? decimal64
+--ro unreserved-bandwidth* [priority]
| +--ro priority uint8
| +--ro bandwidth? decimal64
+--ro te-default-metric? uint32
+--ro performance-metric {te-performance-metric}?
| +--ro measurement
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay? uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-min-delay? uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-max-delay? uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation? uint32
| | +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss?
decimal64
| | +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
decimal64
| | +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
decimal64
| +--ro normality
| +--ro unidirectional-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-min-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-max-delay?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-delay-variation?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-packet-loss?
performance-metric-normality
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
| +--ro unidirectional-residual-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-available-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
| +--ro unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth?
performance-metric-normality
+--ro link-protection-type? enumeration
+--ro interface-switching-capabilities* [switching-
capability]
| +--ro switching-capability identityref
| +--ro encoding? identityref
| +--ro max-lsp-bandwidth* [priority]
| | +--ro priority uint8
| | +--ro bandwidth? decimal64
| +--ro packet-switch-capable
| | +--ro minimum-lsp-bandwidth? decimal64
| | +--ro interface-mtu? uint16
| +--ro time-division-multiplex-capable
| +--ro minimum-lsp-bandwidth? decimal64
| +--ro indication? enumeration
+--ro te-srlgs
+--ro values* te-types:srlg
6. TE Topology Yang Module
<CODE BEGINS>
module ietf-te-topology {
yang-version 1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology";
// replace with IANA namespace when assigned
prefix "tet";
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix "yang";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
import ietf-te-types {
prefix "te-types";
}
organization "TBD";
contact "TBD";
description "TE topology model";
revision "2015-07-02" {
description "Initial revision";
reference "TBD";
}
/*
* Features
*/
feature te-topology-hierarchy {
description
"This feature indicates that the system allows underlay
and/or overlay TE topology hierarchy.";
}
feature te-performance-metric {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports
TE performance metric defined in
draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions.";
}
feature configuration-schedule {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports
configuration scheduling.";
}
feature template {
description
"This feature indicates that the system supports
template configuration.";
}
/*
* Typedefs
*/
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
typedef te-global-id {
type uint32;
description
"An identifier to uniquely identify an operator, which can be
either a provider or a client.
The definition of this type is taken from RFC6370 and RFC503.
This attribute type is used solely to provide a globally
unique context for TE topologies.";
}
typedef te-topology-id {
type string {
pattern '/?([a-zA-Z0-9\-_.]+)(/[a-zA-Z0-9\-_.]+)*';
}
description
"An identifier for a topology.";
}
typedef te-template-name {
type string {
pattern '/?([a-zA-Z0-9\-_.]+)(/[a-zA-Z0-9\-_.]+)*';
}
description
"A type for the name of a TE node template or TE link
template.";
}
typedef te-node-id {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"An identifier for a node in a topology.
The identifier is represented as an IPv4 or IPv6 address.
The identifier SHOULD be chosen such that the same node in a
real network topology will always be identified through the
same identifier, even if the model is instantiated in
separate
datastores. An implementation MAY choose to capture semantics
in the identifier, for example to indicate the type of node
and/or the type of topology that the node is a part of.";
}
typedef te-link-id {
type union {
type uint32; // Unnumbered
type inet:ip-address; // IPv4 or IPv6 address
}
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
description
"An identifier for a TE link on a node.
The identifier may be opaque.
The identifier SHOULD be chosen such that the same TP in a
real network topology will always be identified through the
same identifier, even if the model is instantiated in
separate
datastores. An implementation MAY choose to capture semantics
in the identifier, for example to indicate the type of TP
and/or the type of node and topology that the TP is a part
of.";
}
typedef te-topology-event-type {
type enumeration {
enum "add" {
value 0;
description
"A TE node or te-link has
been added";
}
enum "remove" {
value 1;
description
"A TE node or te-link has
been removed";
}
enum "update" {
value 2;
description
"A TE node or te-link has
been updated";
}
}
description "TE Event type for notifications";
} // te-topology-event-type
typedef performance-metric-normality {
type enumeration {
enum "unknown" {
value 0;
description
"Unknown";
}
enum "normal" {
value 1;
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
description
"Normal";
}
enum "abnormal" {
value 2;
description
"Abnormal. The anomalous bit is set.";
}
}
description
"Indicates whether a performance metric is normal, abnormal,
or unknown.";
}
/*
* Identities
*/
identity flag-identity {
description "Base type for flags";
}
identity undefined-flag {
base "flag-identity";
description "Undefined flag";
}
typedef flag-type {
type identityref {
base "flag-identity";
}
description "Type for flags";
}
/*
* Groupings
*/
grouping topo-ref {
description
"Grouping for an absolute reference to a topology instance.";
leaf provider-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:provider-id";
}
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
description
"An absolute reference to a provider-id.";
}
leaf client-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:client-id";
}
description
"An absolute reference to a client-id.";
}
leaf topology-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:te-topology-id";
}
description
"An absolute reference to a te-topology-id.";
}
} // topo-ref
grouping link-ref {
description
"Grouping for an absolute reference to a link instance.";
uses topo-ref;
leaf source-te-node-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology"
+"[tet:provider-id = current()/../provider-id-ref]"
+"[tet:client-id = current()/../client-id-ref]"
+"[tet:te-topology-id = current()/../topology-id-ref]"
+"/tet:link/tet:source-te-node-id";
}
description
"An absolute reference to a link instance.";
}
leaf source-te-link-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology"
+"[tet:provider-id = current()/../provider-id-ref]"
+"[tet:client-id = current()/../client-id-ref]"
+"[tet:te-topology-id = current()/../topology-id-ref]"
+"/tet:link/tet:source-te-link-id";
}
description
"An absolute reference to a link instance.";
}
leaf dest-te-node-id-ref {
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology"
+"[tet:provider-id = current()/../provider-id-ref]"
+"[tet:client-id = current()/../client-id-ref]"
+"[tet:te-topology-id = current()/../topology-id-ref]"
+"/tet:link/tet:dest-te-node-id";
}
description
"An absolute reference to a link instance.";
}
leaf dest-te-link-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology"
+"[tet:provider-id = current()/../provider-id-ref]"
+"[tet:client-id = current()/../client-id-ref]"
+"[tet:te-topology-id = current()/../topology-id-ref]"
+"/tet:link/tet:dest-te-link-id";
}
description
"An absolute reference to a link instance.";
}
} // link-ref
grouping node-ref {
description
"Grouping for an absolute reference to a node instance.";
uses topo-ref;
leaf node-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology"
+"[tet:provider-id = current()/../provider-id-ref]"
+"[tet:client-id = current()/../client-id-ref]"
+"[tet:te-topology-id = current()/../topology-id-ref]"
+"/tet:node/tet:te-node-id";
}
description
"An absolute reference to a node instance.";
}
} // node-ref
grouping link-end-ref {
description
"Grouping for an absolute reference to a TE link end, which is
the local representation of a TE link on a node.";
uses node-ref;
leaf link-end-ref {
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology"
+"[tet:provider-id = current()/../provider-id-ref]"
+"[tet:client-id = current()/../client-id-ref]"
+"[tet:te-topology-id = current()/../topology-id-ref]"
+"/tet:node[tet:te-node-id = current()/../node-ref]"
+"/tet:te-link/tet:te-link-id";
}
description
"Grouping for an absolute reference to a TE link end.";
}
} // link-end-ref
grouping te-topology-type {
description
"Identifies the TE topology type.";
container te-topology {
presence "indicates TE topology";
description
"Its presence identifies the TE topology type.";
}
} // te-topology-type
grouping te-path-element {
description
"A group of attributes defining an element in a TE path
such as TE node, TE link, TE atomic resource or label.";
uses te-types:explicit-route-subobject;
} // te-path-element
grouping config-schedule-attributes {
description
"A list of schedules defining when a particular
configuration takes effect.";
list schedules {
if-feature configuration-schedule;
key "schedule-id";
description "A list of schedule elements.";
leaf schedule-id {
type uint32;
description "Identifies the schedule element.";
}
leaf start {
type yang:date-and-time;
description "Start time.";
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
}
leaf schedule-duration {
type string {
pattern
'P(\d+Y)?(\d+M)?(\d+W)?(\d+D)?T(\d+H)?(\d+M)?(\d+S)?';
}
description "Schedule duration in ISO 8601 format.";
}
leaf repeat-interval {
type string {
pattern
'R\d*/P(\d+Y)?(\d+M)?(\d+W)?(\d+D)?T(\d+H)?(\d+M)?'
+ '(\d+S)?';
}
description "Repeat interval in ISO 8601 format.";
}
}
} // config-schedule-attributes
grouping information-source-attributes {
description
"The attributes identifying source that has provided the
related information, and the source credibility.";
leaf information-source {
type enumeration {
enum "unknown" {
description "The source is unknown";
}
enum "locally-configured" {
description "Configured entity";
}
enum "ospfv2" {
description "OSPFv2";
}
enum "ospfv3" {
description "OSPFv3";
}
enum "isis" {
description "ISIS";
}
enum "system-processed" {
description "System processed entity.";
}
enum "other" {
description "Other source";
}
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
}
description
"Indicates the source of the information.";
}
container information-source-state {
description
"The container contains state attributes related to
the information source.";
leaf credibility-preference {
type uint16;
description
"The preference value to calculate the traffic
engineering database credibility value used for
tie-break selection between different
information-source values.
Higher value is more preferable.";
}
container topology {
description
"When the information is processed by the system,
the attributes in this container indicate which topology
is used to process to generate the result information.";
leaf provider-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:provider-id";
}
description
"A reference to a provider-id.";
}
leaf client-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:client-id";
}
description
"A reference to a client-id.";
}
leaf topology-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology"
+"/tet:te-topology-id";
}
description
"A reference to a te-topology-id.";
}
} // topology
leaf routing-instance {
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
type string;
description
"When applicable, this is the name of a routing instance
from which the information is learned.";
} // routing-information
}
} // information-source-attributes
grouping te-node-attributes {
description "Node attributes in a TE topology.";
container te-node-attributes {
description "Node attributes in a TE topology.";
uses config-schedule-attributes;
leaf name {
type inet:domain-name;
description "Node name.";
}
leaf-list signaling-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description "Node signaling address.";
}
leaf-list flag {
type flag-type;
description "Node operational flags.";
}
leaf is-abstract {
type boolean;
description
"true if the node is abstract, false when the node is
actual.";
}
container underlay-topology {
if-feature te-topology-hierarchy;
description
"When an abstract node encapsulates a topology,
the attributes in this container point to said topology.";
leaf provider-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:provider-id";
}
description
"A reference to a provider-id.";
}
leaf client-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:client-id";
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
}
description
"A reference to a client-id.";
}
leaf topology-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology"
+"/tet:te-topology-id";
}
description
"A reference to a te-topology-id.";
}
}
list connectivity-matrix {
key "id";
description
"Represents node's switching limitations, i.e. limitations
in interconnecting network TE links across the node.";
leaf id {
type uint32;
description "Identifies the connectivity-matrix entry.";
}
container from-link {
uses tet:link-end-ref;
description
"Reference to source NTP.";
}
container to-link {
uses tet:link-end-ref;
description
"Reference to destination NTP.";
}
leaf is-allowed {
type boolean;
description
"true - switching is allowed,
false - switching is disallowed.";
}
}
}
list te-link {
key "te-link-id";
description
"The local representation of a TE link, which
interconnect TE nodes.";
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 53]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
leaf te-link-id {
type te-link-id;
description
"TE link identifier.";
}
choice stack-level {
description
"The TE link can be partitioned into bundled
links, or component links.";
case bundle {
container bundled-links {
description
"A set of bundled links";
list bundled-link {
key "sequence";
description
"Specify a bundled interface that is
further partitioned.";
leaf sequence {
type uint32;
description
"Identify the sequence in the bundle.";
}
leaf te-link-ref {
type leafref {
path "../../../te-link-id";
require-instance true;
}
description
"Reference to TE link on this node.";
}
}
}
}
case component {
container component-links {
description
"A set of component links";
list component-link {
key "sequence";
description
"Specify a component interface that is
sufficient to unambiguously identify the
appropriate resources";
leaf sequence {
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 54]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
type uint32;
description
"Identify the sequence in the bundle.";
}
leaf component-link-ref {
type leafref {
path "/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:name";
require-instance false;
}
description
"Reference to component link on this
node.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
} // te-node-attributes
grouping te-node-state-attributes {
description "Node state attributes in a TE topology.";
container te-node-state {
description "Node state attributes in a TE topology.";
uses information-source-attributes;
}
} // te-node-state-attributes
grouping te-link-underlay-attributes {
description "Attributes for te-link underlay.";
container underlay-primary-path {
description
"The service path on the underlay topology that
supports this link.";
leaf provider-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:provider-id";
require-instance false;
}
description
"A reference to a provider-id.";
}
leaf client-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:client-id";
require-instance false;
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 55]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
}
description
"A reference to a client-id.";
}
leaf topology-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:te-topology-id";
require-instance false;
}
description
"Identifies the topology where the path belongs.";
}
list path-element {
key "path-element-id";
description
"A list of path elements describing the service path";
leaf path-element-id {
type uint32;
description "To identify the element in a path.";
}
uses te-path-element;
}
} // underlay-primary-path
list underlay-backup-path {
key "index";
description
"A list of backup service paths on the underlay topology
that
protect the underlay primary path. If the primary path is
not protected, the list contains zero elements. If the
primary path is protected, the list contains one or more
elements.";
leaf index {
type uint32;
description
"A sequence number to identify a backup path.";
}
leaf provider-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:provider-id";
require-instance false;
}
description
"A reference to a provider-id.";
}
leaf client-id-ref {
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 56]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:client-id";
require-instance false;
}
description
"A reference to a client-id.";
}
leaf topology-id-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tet:te-topologies/tet:topology/tet:te-topology-id";
require-instance false;
}
description
"Identifies the topology where the path belongs.";
}
list path-element {
key "path-element-id";
description
"A list of path elements describing the backup service
path";
leaf path-element-id {
type uint32;
description "To identify the element in a path.";
}
uses te-path-element;
}
} // underlay-backup-path
leaf underlay-protection-type {
type uint16;
description
"Underlay protection type desired for this link";
}
container underlay-trail-src {
uses tet:link-end-ref;
description
"Source TE link of the underlay trail.";
}
container underlay-trail-des {
uses tet:link-end-ref;
description
"Destination TE link of the underlay trail.";
}
} // te-link-underlay-attributes
grouping te-link-state-underlay-attributes {
description "State attributes for te-link underlay.";
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 57]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
leaf dynamic {
type boolean;
description
"true if the underlay is dynamically created.";
}
leaf committed {
type boolean;
description
"true if the underlay is committed.";
}
} // te-link-state-underlay-attributes
grouping performance-metric-attributes {
description
"Link performance information in real time.";
reference
"draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions.";
leaf unidirectional-delay {
type uint32 {
range 0..16777215;
}
description "Delay or latency in micro seconds.";
}
leaf unidirectional-min-delay {
type uint32 {
range 0..16777215;
}
description "Minimum delay or latency in micro seconds.";
}
leaf unidirectional-max-delay {
type uint32 {
range 0..16777215;
}
description "Maximum delay or latency in micro seconds.";
}
leaf unidirectional-delay-variation {
type uint32 {
range 0..16777215;
}
description "Delay variation in micro seconds.";
}
leaf unidirectional-packet-loss {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 6;
range "0 .. 50.331642";
}
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 58]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
description
"Packet loss as a percentage of the total traffic sent
over a configurable interval. The finest precision is
0.000003%.";
}
leaf unidirectional-residual-bandwidth {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 2;
}
description
"Residual bandwidth that subtracts tunnel
reservations from Maximum Bandwidth (or link capacity)
[RFC3630] and provides an aggregated remainder across QoS
classes.";
}
leaf unidirectional-available-bandwidth {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 2;
}
description
"Available bandwidth that is defined to be residual
bandwidth minus the measured bandwidth used for the
actual forwarding of non-RSVP-TE LSP packets. For a
bundled link, available bandwidth is defined to be the
sum of the component link available bandwidths.";
}
leaf unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 2;
}
description
"Bandwidth utilization that represents the actual
utilization of the link (i.e. as measured in the router).
For a bundled link, bandwidth utilization is defined to
be the sum of the component link bandwidth
utilizations.";
}
} // performance-metric-attributes
grouping performance-metric-normality-attributes {
description
"Link performance metric normality attributes.";
reference
"draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions.";
leaf unidirectional-delay {
type performance-metric-normality;
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 59]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
description "Delay normality.";
}
leaf unidirectional-min-delay {
type performance-metric-normality;
description "Minimum delay or latency normality.";
}
leaf unidirectional-max-delay {
type performance-metric-normality;
description "Maximum delay or latency normality.";
}
leaf unidirectional-delay-variation {
type performance-metric-normality;
description "Delay variation normality.";
}
leaf unidirectional-packet-loss {
type performance-metric-normality;
description "Packet loss normality.";
}
leaf unidirectional-residual-bandwidth {
type performance-metric-normality;
description "Residual bandwidth normality.";
}
leaf unidirectional-available-bandwidth {
type performance-metric-normality;
description "Available bandwidth normality.";
}
leaf unidirectional-utilized-bandwidth {
type performance-metric-normality;
description "Bandwidth utilization normality.";
}
} // performance-metric-normality-attributes
grouping performance-metric-throttle-container {
description
"A container controlling performance metric throttle.";
container performance-metric-throttle {
if-feature te-performance-metric;
must "suppression-interval >= measure-interval" {
error-message
"suppression-interval cannot be less then
measure-interval";
description
"Constraint on suppression-interval and
measure-interval.";
}
description
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 60]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
"Link performance information in real time.";
reference
"draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions.";
leaf unidirectional-delay-offset {
type uint32 {
range 0..16777215;
}
description
"Offset value to be added to the measured delay value.";
}
leaf measure-interval {
type uint32;
default 30;
description
"Interval in seconds to measure the extended metric
values.";
}
leaf advertisement-interval {
type uint32;
description
"Interval in seconds to advertise the extended metric
values.";
}
leaf suppression-interval {
type uint32 {
range "1 .. max";
}
default 120;
description
"Interval in seconds to suppress advertising the extended
metric values.";
}
container threshold-out {
uses performance-metric-attributes;
description
"If the measured parameter falls outside an upper bound
for all but the min delay metric (or lower bound for
min-delay metric only) and the advertised value is not
already outside that bound, anomalous announcement will be
triggered.";
}
container threshold-in {
uses performance-metric-attributes;
description
"If the measured parameter falls inside an upper bound
for all but the min delay metric (or lower bound for
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 61]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
min-delay metric only) and the advertised value is not
already inside that bound, normal (anomalous-flag cleared)
announcement will be triggered.";
}
container threshold-accelerated-advertisement {
description
"When the difference between the last advertised value and
current measured value exceed this threshold, anomalous
announcement will be triggered.";
uses performance-metric-attributes;
}
}
} // performance-metric-throttle-container
grouping te-link-info-attributes {
description
"Advertised TE information attributes.";
leaf link-index {
type uint64;
description
"The link identifier. If OSPF is used, this represents an
ospfLsdbID. If IS-IS is used, this represents an isisLSPID.
If a locally configured link is used, this object represents
a unique value, which is locally defined in a router.";
}
leaf administrative-group {
type te-types:admin-groups;
description
"Administrative group or color of the link.
This attribute covers both administrative group (defined in
RFC3630, RFC5329, and RFC5305), and extended administrative
group (defined in RFC7308).";
}
leaf max-link-bandwidth {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 2;
}
description
"Maximum bandwidth that can be seen on this link in this
direction. Units in bytes per second";
}
leaf max-resv-link-bandwidth {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 2;
}
description
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 62]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
"Maximum amount of bandwidth that can be reserved in this
direction in this link. Units in bytes per second";
}
list unreserved-bandwidth {
key "priority";
max-elements "8";
description
"Unreserved bandwidth for 0-7 priority levels. Units in
bytes per second";
leaf priority {
type uint8 {
range "0..7";
}
description "Priority";
}
leaf bandwidth {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 2;
}
description
"Unreserved bandwidth for this level";
}
}
leaf te-default-metric {
type uint32;
description
"Traffic Engineering Metric";
}
container performance-metric {
if-feature te-performance-metric;
description
"Link performance information in real time.";
reference
"draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions.";
container measurement {
description
"Measured performance metric values. Static configuration
and manual overrides of these measurements are also
allowed.";
uses performance-metric-attributes;
}
container normality
{
description
"Performance metric normality values.";
uses performance-metric-normality-attributes;
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 63]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
}
}
leaf link-protection-type {
type enumeration {
enum "unprotected" {
description "unprotected";
}
enum "extra-traffic" {
description "Extra traffic";
}
enum "shared" {
description "Shared";
}
enum "1-for-1" {
description "One for one protection";
}
enum "1-plus-1" {
description "One plus one protection";
}
enum "enhanced" {
description "Enhanced protection";
}
}
description
"Link Protection Type desired for this link";
}
list interface-switching-capabilities {
key "switching-capability";
description
"List of interface capabilities for this interface";
leaf switching-capability {
type identityref {
base te-types:switching-capabilities;
}
description
"Switching Capability for this interface";
}
leaf encoding {
type identityref {
base te-types:lsp-encoding-types;
}
description
"Encoding supported by this interface";
}
list max-lsp-bandwidth {
key "priority";
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 64]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
max-elements "8";
description
"Maximum LSP Bandwidth at priorities 0-7";
leaf priority {
type uint8 {
range "0..7";
}
description "Priority";
}
leaf bandwidth {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 2;
}
description
"Max LSP Bandwidth for this level";
}
}
container packet-switch-capable {
when "../switching-capability = 'PSC-1' or "
+"../switching-capability = 'PSC-2' or "
+"../switching-capability = 'PSC-3' or "
+"../switching-capability = 'PSC-4'" {
description "Valid only for PSC";
}
description
"Interface has packet-switching capabilities";
leaf minimum-lsp-bandwidth {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 2;
}
description
"Minimum LSP Bandwidth. Units in bytes per second";
}
leaf interface-mtu {
type uint16;
description
"Interface MTU";
}
}
container time-division-multiplex-capable {
when "../switching-capability = 'TDM'" {
description "Valid only for TDM";
}
description
"Interface has time-division multiplex capabilities";
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 65]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
leaf minimum-lsp-bandwidth {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 2;
}
description
"Minimum LSP Bandwidth. Units in bytes per second";
}
leaf indication {
type enumeration {
enum "standard" {
description "Indicates support of standard SONET/SDH";
}
enum "arbitrary" {
description "Indicates support of arbitrary
SONET/SDH";
}
}
description
"Indication whether the interface supports Standard or
Arbitrary SONET/SDH";
}
}
}
container te-srlgs {
description
"A list of SLRGs.";
leaf-list values {
type te-types:srlg;
description "SRLG value";
}
}
} // te-link-info-attributes
grouping te-link-attributes {
description
"Link attributes in a TE topology.";
container te-link-attributes {
description "Link attributes in a TE topology.";
uses config-schedule-attributes;
leaf name {
type string;
description "Link Name";
}
leaf-list flag {
type flag-type;
description "Link flags";
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 66]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
}
leaf is-abstract {
type boolean;
description "true if the link is abstract.";
}
container underlay {
if-feature te-topology-hierarchy;
presence
"Indicates the underlay exists for this link.";
description "State of the underlay of this link.";
uses te-link-underlay-attributes;
} // underlay
leaf admin-status {
type enumeration {
enum up {
value 1;
description
"Enabled.";
}
enum down {
value 2;
description
"Disabled.";
}
enum testing {
value 3;
description
"In some test mode.";
}
}
description
"The desired state of the link.";
}
uses performance-metric-throttle-container;
uses te-link-info-attributes;
}
} // te-link-attributes
grouping te-link-state-attributes {
description
"Link state attributes in a TE topology.";
container te-link-state {
description "Link state attributes in a TE topology.";
leaf oper-status {
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 67]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
type enumeration {
enum up {
value 1;
description
"Operational up";
}
enum down {
value 2;
description
"Operational down.";
}
enum testing {
value 3;
description
"In some test mode";
}
enum unknown {
value 4;
description
"Status cannot be determined for some reason.";
}
}
description
"The current operational state of the link.";
}
uses information-source-attributes;
list alt-information-sources {
key "information-source";
description
"A list of information sources learned but not used.";
uses information-source-attributes;
uses te-link-info-attributes;
}
}
} // te-link-state-attributes
grouping template-attributes {
description
"Common attributes for all templates.";
leaf priority {
type uint16;
description
"The preference value to resolve conflicts between different
templates. When two or more templates specify values for
one configuration attribute, the value from the template
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 68]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
with the highest priority is used.";
}
leaf reference-change-policy {
type enumeration {
enum no-action {
description
"When an attribute changes in this template, the
configuration node referring to this template does
not take any action.";
}
enum not-allowed {
description
"When any configuration object has a reference to this
template, changing this template is not allowed.";
}
enum cascade {
description
"When an attribute changes in this template, the
configuration object referring to this template applies
the new attribute value to the corresponding
configuration.";
}
}
description
"This attribute specifies the action taken to a
configuration
node that has a reference to this template.";
}
} // template-attributes
/*
* Configuration data nodes
*/
container te-topologies {
description
"This container acts as the top-level data element of
configuration data.";
list topology {
key "provider-id client-id te-topology-id";
description
"This is the model of an abstract topology. A topology
contains nodes and links. Each topology MUST be identified
by a unique te-topology-id for reason that a network could
contain many topologies.";
leaf provider-id {
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 69]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
type te-global-id;
description
"An identifier to uniquely identify a provider.";
}
leaf client-id {
type te-global-id;
description
"An identifier to uniquely identify a client.";
}
leaf te-topology-id {
type te-topology-id;
description
"It is presumed that a datastore will contain many
topologies. To distinguish between topologies it is
vital to have UNIQUE topology identifiers.";
}
uses config-schedule-attributes;
container topology-types {
description
"This container is used to identify the type, or types (as
a topology can support several types simultaneously), of
the topology.
Topology types are the subject of several integrity
constraints that an implementing server can validate in
order to maintain integrity of the datastore.
Topology types are indicated through separate data nodes;
the set of topology types is expected to increase over
time.
To add support for a new topology, an augmenting module
needs to augment this container with a new empty optional
container to indicate the new topology type.
The use of a container allows to indicate a
subcategorization of topology types.
The container SHALL NOT be augmented with any data nodes
that serve a purpose other than identifying a particular
topology type.";
uses te-topology-type; // Defines the TE topology type.
}
list node {
key "te-node-id";
leaf te-node-id {
type te-node-id;
description
"The identifier of a node in the topology.
A node is specific to a topology to which it belongs.";
}
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 70]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
description
"The list of network nodes defined for the topology.";
leaf te-node-template {
if-feature template;
type leafref {
path "/te-topologies/node-template/name";
}
description
"The reference to a TE node template.";
}
uses te-node-attributes;
}
list link {
key "source-te-node-id source-te-link-id "
+ "dest-te-node-id dest-te-link-id";
leaf source-te-node-id {
type leafref {
path "../../node/te-node-id";
}
mandatory true;
description
"Source node identifier, must be in same topology.";
}
leaf source-te-link-id {
type leafref {
path "../../node[te-node-id = "
+ "current()/../source-te-node-id]/"
+ "te-link/te-link-id";
}
mandatory true;
description
"Source TE link identifier, must be in same topology.";
}
leaf dest-te-node-id {
type leafref {
path "../../node/te-node-id";
}
mandatory true;
description
"Destination node identifier, must be in the same
topology.";
}
leaf dest-te-link-id {
type leafref {
path "../../node[te-node-id = "
+ "current()/../dest-te-node-id]/"
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 71]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
+ "te-link/te-link-id";
}
mandatory true;
description
"Destination TE link identifier, must be in same
topology.";
}
description
"TE link is a logical construct that represents a way
to group/map information about certain physical
resources (and their properties) that interconnect TE
nodes.
A Network Link connects a by Local (Source) node and
a Remote (Destination) Network Nodes via a set of the
nodes' TE links.
As it is possible to have several links between the
same source and destination nodes, and as a link
could potentially be re-homed, to ensure that we
would always know to distinguish between
links, every link is identified by a dedicated link
identifier.
Note that a link models a point-to-point link, not a
multipoint link.";
leaf te-link-template {
if-feature template;
type leafref {
path "/te-topologies/link-template/name";
}
description
"The reference to a TE link template.";
}
uses te-link-attributes;
} // link
} // topology
list node-template {
if-feature template;
key "name";
leaf name {
type te-template-name;
description
"The name to identify a TE node template.";
}
description
"The list of TE node templates used to define sharable
and reusable TE node attributes.";
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 72]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
uses template-attributes;
leaf-list te-node-template {
type leafref {
path "/te-topologies/node-template/name";
}
description
"The reference to a TE node template.";
}
uses te-node-attributes;
} // node
list link-template {
if-feature template;
key "name";
leaf name {
type te-template-name;
description
"The name to identify a TE link template.";
}
description
"The list of TE link templates used to define sharable
and reusable TE link attributes.";
uses template-attributes;
leaf-list te-link-template {
type leafref {
path "/te-topologies/link-template/name";
}
description
"The reference to a TE link template.";
}
uses te-link-attributes;
} // link
} // te-topologies
/*
* Operational state data nodes
*/
container te-topologies-state {
config false;
description
"This container acts as the top-level state data element of
operational data.";
list topology {
key "provider-id client-id te-topology-id";
description
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 73]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
"This is the model of an abstract topology. A topology
contains nodes and links. Each topology MUST be identified
by a unique te-topology-id for reason that a network could
contain many topologies.";
leaf provider-id {
type te-global-id;
description
"An identifier to uniquely identify a provider.";
}
leaf client-id {
type te-global-id;
description
"An identifier to uniquely identify a client.";
}
leaf te-topology-id {
type te-topology-id;
description
"It is presumed that a datastore will contain many
topologies. To distinguish between topologies it is
vital to have UNIQUE topology identifiers.";
}
leaf server-provided {
type boolean;
config false;
description
"Indicates whether the topology is configurable by
clients,
or whether it is provided by the server. This leaf is
populated by the server implementing the model.
It is set to false for topologies that are created by a
client; it is set to true otherwise. If it is set to
true,
any attempt to edit the topology MUST be rejected.";
}
container topology-types {
description
"This container is used to identify the type, or types (as
a topology can support several types simultaneously), of
the topology.
Topology types are the subject of several integrity
constraints that an implementing server can validate in
order to maintain integrity of the datastore.
Topology types are indicated through separate data nodes;
the set of topology types is expected to increase over
time.
To add support for a new topology, an augmenting module
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 74]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
needs to augment this container with a new empty optional
container to indicate the new topology type.
The use of a container allows to indicate a
subcategorization of topology types.
The container SHALL NOT be augmented with any data nodes
that serve a purpose other than identifying a particular
topology type.";
uses te-topology-type; // Defines the TE topology type.
}
list node {
key "te-node-id";
leaf te-node-id {
type te-node-id;
description
"The identifier of a node in the topology.
A node is specific to a topology to which it belongs.";
}
description
"The list of network nodes defined for the topology.";
leaf te-node-template {
if-feature template;
type leafref {
path "/te-topologies/node-template/name";
}
description
"The reference to a TE node template.";
}
uses te-node-attributes;
uses te-node-state-attributes;
}
list link {
key "source-te-node-id source-te-link-id "
+ "dest-te-node-id dest-te-link-id";
leaf source-te-node-id {
type leafref {
path "../../node/te-node-id";
}
mandatory true;
description
"Source node identifier, must be in same topology.";
}
leaf source-te-link-id {
type leafref {
path "../../node[te-node-id = "
+ "current()/../source-te-node-id]/"
+ "te-link/te-link-id";
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 75]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
}
mandatory true;
description
"Source TE link identifier, must be in same topology.";
}
leaf dest-te-node-id {
type leafref {
path "../../node/te-node-id";
}
mandatory true;
description
"Destination node identifier, must be in the same
topology.";
}
leaf dest-te-link-id {
type leafref {
path "../../node[te-node-id = "
+ "current()/../dest-te-node-id]/"
+ "te-link/te-link-id";
}
mandatory true;
description
"Destination TE link identifier, must be in same
topology.";
}
description
"TE link is a logical construct that represents a way
to group/map information about certain physical
resources (and their properties) that interconnect TE
nodes.
A Network Link connects a by Local (Source) node and
a Remote (Destination) Network Nodes via a set of the
nodes' TE links.
As it is possible to have several links between the
same source and destination nodes, and as a link
could potentially be re-homed, to ensure that we
would always know to distinguish between
links, every link is identified by a dedicated link
identifier.
Note that a link models a point-to-point link, not a
multipoint link.";
leaf te-link-template {
if-feature template;
type leafref {
path "/te-topologies/link-template/name";
}
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 76]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
description
"The reference to a TE link template.";
}
uses te-link-attributes;
uses te-link-state-attributes;
} // link
} // topology
} // te-topologies
augment "/te-topologies-state/topology/link/te-link-attributes/"
+ "underlay" {
description "Add state attributes to te-link underlay.";
uses te-link-state-underlay-attributes;
}
/*
* Notifications
*/
notification te-node-event {
description "Notification event for TE node";
leaf event-type {
type te-topology-event-type;
description "Event type";
}
uses node-ref;
uses te-topology-type;
uses tet:te-node-attributes;
uses tet:te-node-state-attributes;
}
notification te-link-event {
description "Notification event for TE link";
leaf event-type {
type te-topology-event-type;
description "Event type";
}
uses link-ref;
uses te-topology-type;
uses tet:te-link-attributes;
uses tet:te-link-state-attributes;
}
augment "/te-link-event/te-link-attributes/underlay" {
description "Add state attributes to te-link underlay.";
uses te-link-state-underlay-attributes;
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 77]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
7. Security Considerations
The transport protocol used for retrieving/manipulating the TE
topology data MUST support authentication and SHOULD support
encryption. The data-model by itself does not create any security
implications.
8. IANA Considerations
This document registers the following URIs in the IETF XML registry
[RFC3688]. Following the format in [RFC3688], the following
registration is requested to be made.
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names
registry [RFC6020].
name: ietf-te-topology
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-topology
prefix: tet
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
January 2004.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the
Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
October 2010.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., "Common YANG Data Types", RFC 6991,
July 2013.
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 78]
Internet-Draft YANG - TE Topology July 2015
[RFC3945] Mannie, E., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
(GMPLS) Architecture", October 2004.
[YANG-NET-TOPO] Clemm, A., "A Data Model for Network Topologies",
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo (Work in Progress).
[YANG-PUSH] Clemm, A., "Subscribing to YANG datastore push updates",
draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push (Work in Progress).
9.2. Informative References
[RFC2702] Awduche, D., "Requirements for Traffic Engineering Over
MPLS", RFC 2702, September 1999.
10. Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Lou Berger, Sue Hares, Mazen
Khaddam, Cyril Margaria and Zafar Ali for participating in design
discussions and providing valuable insights.
Authors' Addresses
Xufeng Liu
Ericsson
Email: xufeng.liu@ericsson.com
Igor Bryskin
ADVA Optical Networking
Email: ibryskin@advaoptical.com
Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Juniper Networks
Email: vbeeram@juniper.net
Tarek Saad
Cisco Systems Inc
Email: tsaad@cisco.com
Himanshu Shah
Ciena
Email: hshah@ciena.com
Oscar Gonzalez De Dios
Telefonica
Email: oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com
Liu, et al Expires January 6, 2016 [Page 79]
