[Search] [pdfized|bibtex] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 rfc4554                                    Informational
IPv6 Operations                                                 T. Chown
Internet-Draft                                 University of Southampton
Expires: September 7, 2006                                 March 6, 2006

     Use of VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence in Enterprise Networks

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at

   This Internet-Draft will expire on September 7, 2006.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).


   Ethernet VLANs are quite commonly used in enterprise networks for the
   purposes of traffic segregation.  This document describes how such
   VLANs can be readily used to deploy IPv6 networking in an enterprise,
   which focuses on the scenario of early deployment prior to
   availability of IPv6-capable switch-router equipment.  In this method
   IPv6 may be routed in parallel with the existing IPv4 in the
   enterprise and delivered at Layer 2 via VLAN technology.  The IPv6
   connectivity to the enterprise may or may not enter the site via the
   same physical link.

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006               [Page 1]

Internet-Draft       VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence          March 2006

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  Enabling IPv6 per link . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     2.1.  IPv6 routing over VLANs  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     2.2.  One VLAN per router interface  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     2.3.  Collapsed VLANs on a single interface  . . . . . . . . . .  5
     2.4.  Congruent IPv4 and IPv6 Subnets  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     2.5.  IPv6 Addressing  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     2.6.  Final IPv6 Deployment  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
   3.  Example VLAN topology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   4.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   5.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   6.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   7.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   Appendix A.  Appendix: Configuration example . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
   Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 13

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006               [Page 2]

Internet-Draft       VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence          March 2006

1.  Introduction

   Ethernet VLANs are quite commonly used in enterprise networks for the
   purposes of traffic segregation.  This document describes how such
   VLANs can be readily used to deploy IPv6 networking in an enterprise,
   including the scenario of early deployment prior to availability of
   IPv6-capable switch-router equipment, where IPv6 may be routed in
   parallel with the existing IPv4 in the enterprise and delivered to
   the desired LANs via VLAN technology.

   It is expected that in the long run, sites migrating to dual-stack
   networking will either upgrade existing switch-router equipment to
   support IPv6 or procure new equipment that supports IPv6.  If a site
   already has production routers deployed that support IPv6, the
   procedures described in this document are not required.  In the
   interim however, a method is required for early IPv6 adopters that
   enables IPv6 to be deployed in a structured, managed way to some or
   all of an enterprise network which currently lacks IPv6 support in
   its core infrastructure.

   The IEEE 802.1Q VLAN standard allows separate LANs to be deployed
   over a single bridged LAN, by inserting "Virtual LAN" tagging or
   membership information into Ethernet frames.  Hosts and switches that
   support VLANs effectively allow software-based reconfiguration of
   LANs through configuration of the tagging parameters.  The software
   control means VLANs can be used to alter the LAN infrastructure
   without having to physically alter the wiring between the LAN
   segments and Layer 3 routers.

   Many IPv4 enterprise networks are utilising VLAN technology.  Where a
   site does not have IPv6-capable Layer 2/3 switch-router equipment,
   but VLANs are supported, a simple yet effective method exists to
   gradually introduce IPv6 to some or all of that site's network, in
   advance of the site's core infrastructure having dual-stack

   If such a site wishes to introduce IPv6, it may do so by deploying a
   parallel IPv6 routing infrastructure (which is likely to be a
   different platform to the site's main infrastructure equipment, i.e.
   one that supports IPv6 where the existing equipment does not), and
   then using VLAN technology to "overlay" IPv6 links onto existing IPv4
   links.  This can be achieved without needing any changes to the IPv4
   configuration.  The VLANs don't need to differentiate between IPv4
   and IPv6; the deployment is just dual stack, as Ethernet is without

   The IPv4 default route to the VLAN is provided by one (IPv4) router,
   while the IPv6 default route to the VLAN is provided by a different

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006               [Page 3]

Internet-Draft       VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence          March 2006

   (IPv6) router.  The IPv6 router can provide native IPv6 connectivity
   to the whole site with just a single physical interface, thanks to
   VLAN tagging and trunking, as described below.

   The IPv6 connectivity to the enterprise may or may not enter the site
   via the same physical link as the IPv4 traffic, and may be native or
   tunneled from the external provider to the IPv6 routing equipment.

   This VLAN usage is a solution adopted by a number of sites already,
   including that of the author.

   It should be noted that a parallel infrastructure will require
   additional infrastructure and thus cost, and will often require a
   separate link into the site (from an IPv6 provider), quite possibly
   tunneled, that will require the site's security policy to be applied
   (e.g. firewalling, and intrusion detection).  For sites that believe
   early adoption of IPv6 is important, that price is one they may be
   quite willing to pay.  However, this document focuses on the
   technical issues of VLAN usage in such a scenario.

2.  Enabling IPv6 per link

   The precise method by which IPv6 would be "injected" into the
   existing IPv4 network is deployment specific.  For example, perhaps a
   site has an IPv4-only router, connected to an Ethernet switch that
   supports VLANs, and a number of hosts connected to that VLAN.  Let's
   further assume the site has a dozen of these setups which it wishes
   to IPv6-enable immediately.  This could be done by upgrading the
   twelve routers to support IPv6, and turning IPv6 on on those routers.
   However, this may not be practical for various reasons.

   The simplest approach would be to connect an IPv6 router with one
   interface to an ethernet switch, and connect that switch to other
   switches, and then use VLAN tags between the switches and the IPv6
   router to "reach" all the IPv4-only subnets from the IPv6 router.
   Thus the general principle is that the IPv6 router device (e.g.
   performing IPv6 Router Advertisements [1] in the case of stateless
   autoconfiguration) is connected to the target link through the use of
   VLAN capable Layer 2 equipment.

2.1.  IPv6 routing over VLANs

   In a typical scenario where connectivity is to be offered to a number
   of existing IPv6 internal subnets, one IPv6 router could be deployed,
   with both an external interface and one or more internal interfaces.
   The external interface connects to the wider IPv6 internet, and may
   be dual-stack if some tunnel mechanism is used for external

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006               [Page 4]

Internet-Draft       VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence          March 2006

   connectivity, or IPv6-only if a native external connection is

   The internal interface(s) can be connected directly to a VLAN-capable
   switch.  It is then possible to write VLAN tags on the packets sent
   from the internal router interface based on the target IPv6 link
   prefix.  The VLAN-tagged traffic is then transported across the
   internal VLAN-capable site infrastructure to the target IPv6 links
   (which may be dispersed widely across the site network).

   Where the IPv6 router is unable to VLAN-tag the packets, a protocol-
   based VLAN can be created on the VLAN-capable device connected to the
   IPv6 router, causing IPv6 traffic to be tagged and then redistributed
   on (congruent) IPv4 subnet links that lie in the same VLAN.

2.2.  One VLAN per router interface

   The VLAN marking may be done in different ways.  Some sites may
   prefer to use one router interface per VLAN, e.g. if there are three
   internal IPv6 links, a standard PC-based IPv6 router with four
   Ethernet ports could be used, one for the external link and three for
   the internal links.  In such a case one switch port would be needed
   per link, to receive the connectivity from each router port.

   In such a deployment, the IPv6 routing could be cascaded through
   lower tier internal IPv6-only routers.  Here, the internal facing
   ports on the IPv6 edge router may feed other IPv6 routers over IPv6-
   only links which in turn inject the IPv6 connectivity (the stub links
   using 64 bit subnet prefixes and associated Router Advertisements)
   into the VLANs.

2.3.  Collapsed VLANs on a single interface

   Using multiple IPv6 routers and one port per IPv6 link (i.e.  VLAN)
   may be unnecessary.  Many devices now support VLAN tagging based on
   virtual interfaces such that multiple IPv6 VLANs could be assigned
   (trunked) from one physical router interface port.  Thus it is
   possible to use just one router interface for "aggregated" VLAN
   trunking from a switch.  This is a far more interesting case for a
   site planning the introduction of IPv6 to (part of) its site network.

   This approach is viable while the IPv6 traffic load is light.  As
   traffic volume grows, the single collapsed interface could be
   extended to utilise two or more physical ports, where the capacity of
   the IPv6 router device allows it.

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006               [Page 5]

Internet-Draft       VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence          March 2006

2.4.  Congruent IPv4 and IPv6 Subnets

   Such a VLAN-based technique can be used to deploy IPv6-only VLANs in
   an enterprise network.  However most enterprises will be interested
   in dual-stack IPv4-IPv6 networking.

   In such a case the IPv6 connectivity may be injected into the
   existing IPv4 VLANs, such that the IPv4 and IPv6 subnets are
   congruent (i.e. they coincide exactly when superimposed).  Such a
   method may have desirable administrative properties, e.g. the devices
   in each IPv4 subnet will be in the same IPv6 subnets also.  This is
   the method used at the author's site.

   Further, IPv6-only devices may be gradually added into the subnet
   without any need to resize the IPv6 subnet (which may hold in effect
   an infinite number of hosts in a /64 in contrast to IPv4 where the
   subnet size is often relatively limited, or kept to a minimum
   possible due to address space usage concerns).  The lack of
   requirement to periodically resize an IPv6 subnet is a useful
   administrative advantage for IPv6.

2.5.  IPv6 Addressing

   One site using this VLAN technique has chosen to number its IPv6
   links with the format [Site IPv6 prefix]:[VLAN ID]::/64.  The VLAN
   tag is 16 bits so this can work with a typical maximum 48 bit site
   prefix.  This is not a recommended addressing plan, but some sites
   may wish to consider its usage.

2.6.  Final IPv6 Deployment

   The VLAN technique for IPv6 deployment offers a more structured
   alternative to opportunistic per-host intra-site tunnelling methods
   such as ISATAP [2].  It has the ability to offer a simple yet
   efficient method for early IPv6 deployment to an enterprise site.

   When the site acquires IPv6-capable switch-router equipment, the
   VLAN-based mathod can still be used for delivery of IPv6 links to
   physical switch interfaces, just as it is commonly today for IPv4
   subnets, but with a common routing infrastructure.

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006               [Page 6]

Internet-Draft       VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence          March 2006

3.  Example VLAN topology

   The following figure shows how a VLAN topology may be used to
   introduce IPv6 in an enterprise network, using a parallel IPv6
   routing infrastructure and VLAN tagging.

                       External IPv6 Internet
                        IPv6 Access Router
                   Switch-router with VLAN support
                  |Site enterprise infrastructure |
                  |   with support for VLANs      |
                       |                    |
                       |                    |
                 VLAN switch A         VLAN switch B
                   |        |               |
                   |        |               |
               Subnet1    Subnet2        Subnet3

   Figure 1: IPv6 deployment using VLANs (physical diagram)

   In this scenario, the IPv6 access router has one physical port facing
   towards the internal infrastructure.  In this example it need only be
   IPv6-enabled, as its purpose is solely to handle IPv6 traffic for the
   enterprise.  The access router has an additional interface facing
   towards the external infrastructure, which in this example could be
   dual-stack if the external IPv6 connectivity is via a tunnel to an
   IPv6 ISP.

   A number of VLANs are handled by the internal-facing IPv6 router
   port; in this case IPv6 links Subnet1, Subnet2, Subnet3.  The VLANs
   are seen as logical subinterfaces of the physical interface on the
   IPv6 access router, which is using the "collapsed VLAN" method
   described above, tagging the inbound traffic with one of three VLAN
   IDs depending on the target IPv6 Subnet prefix.

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006               [Page 7]

Internet-Draft       VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence          March 2006

   The following figure shows how the IPv6 view of the deployment looks;
   all IPv6 subnets are on-link to the IPv6 access router, whether they
   share the same physical links over the VLAN infrastructure or not.

                     External IPv6 Internet
                     Site IPv6 Access Router
                       |        |         |
                       |        |         |
                    Subnet1  Subnet2   Subnet3

   Figure 2: IPv6 view of the deployment (logical view)

   In this example, the router acts as an IPv6 first-hop access router
   to the physical links, separately from the IPv4-first hop router.
   This technique allows a site to easily "inject" native IPv6 into all
   the links where a VLAN-capable infrastructure is available, enabling
   partial or full IPv6 deployment on the wire in a site.

4.  IANA Considerations

   There are no considerations for IANA in this document.

5.  Security Considerations

   There are no additional security considerations particular to this
   method of enabling IPv6 on a link.

   Where the IPv6 connectivity is delivered into the enterprise network
   by a different path from the IPv4 connectivity, care should be given
   that equivalent application of security policy (e.g. firewalling) is
   made to the IPv6 path.

6.  Acknowledgements

   The author would like to thank colleagues on the 6NET project, where
   this technique for IPv4-IPv6 coexistence is widely deployed, in
   particular Pekka Savola (CSC/FUNET), but also including Janos Mohacsi
   (Hungarnet), Martin Dunmore and Chris Edwards (Lancaster University),
   Christian Strauf (JOIN Project, University of Muenster) and Stig
   Venaas (UNINETT).

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006               [Page 8]

Internet-Draft       VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence          March 2006

7.  Informative References

   [1]  Narten, T., Nordmark, E., and W. Simpson, "Neighbor Discovery
        for IP Version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 2461, December 1998.

   [2]  Templin, F., Gleeson, T., Talwar, M., and D. Thaler, "Intra-Site
        Automatic Tunnel Addressing Protocol (ISATAP)", RFC 4214,
        October 2005.

Appendix A.  Appendix: Configuration example

   In this section we describe a configuration example for using a
   computer running the FreeBSD variant of the Berkeley Software
   Distribution (BSD) operating system as a router to deploy IPv6
   networking across a number of IPv6 links on an enterprise (in this
   case, six links), for a scenario similar to the one described above.
   Here the precise configuration may of course vary depending on the
   existing site VLAN deployment.  This section highlights that the VLAN
   configuration must be manually configured; the support is not

   In this example, the configuration is for an IPv6 BSD router
   connected directly to a site's external IPv6 access router.  The BSD
   router has one interface (dc0) towards the site IPv6access router,
   and three interfaces (dc1, dc2, dc3) over which the internal routing
   is performed (the number of interfaces can be varied, three are used
   here to distribute the traffic load).  The IPv6 documentation prefix
   (2001:db8::/32) is used in the example.

   --- Example IPv6 VLAN configuration, FreeBSD ---

   # To IPv6 enable a vlan
   # 1. Add a new vlan device to cloned_interfaces called vlanX
   # 2. Add an ifconfig_vlanX line, the number is the vlan tag ID
   # 3. Add vlanX to ipv6_network_interfaces
   # 4. Add an ipv6_ifconfig_vlanX line, with a new unique prefix
   # 5. Add vlanX to rtadvd_interface
   # 6. Add vlanX to ipv6_router_flags

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006               [Page 9]

Internet-Draft       VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence          March 2006

   ### Interfaces ###

   # Bring physical interfaces up

   # Create VLan interfaces
   cloned_interfaces="vlan0 vlan1 vlan2 vlan3 vlan4 vlan5 vlan6"

   # Upstream link to IPv6 Access Router
   ifconfig_vlan0="vlan 37 vlandev dc0"

   # Downstream interfaces, load balance over interfaces dc1,dc2,dc3
   ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 11 vlandev dc1" # Subnet1
   ifconfig_vlan2="vlan 17 vlandev dc2" # Subnet2
   ifconfig_vlan3="vlan 24 vlandev dc3" # Subnet3
   ifconfig_vlan4="vlan 25 vlandev dc1" # Subnet4
   ifconfig_vlan5="vlan 34 vlandev dc2" # Subnet5
   ifconfig_vlan6="vlan 14 vlandev dc3" # Subnet6

   ### IPv6 ###

   # Enable ipv6

   # Forwarding

   # Define Interfaces
   ipv6_network_interfaces="vlan0 vlan1 vlan2 vlan3 vlan4 vlan5 vlan6"
   # Define addresses
   ipv6_ifconfig_vlan0="2001:db8:d0:101::2 prefixlen 64" # Uplink
   ipv6_ifconfig_vlan1="2001:db8:d0:111::1 prefixlen 64" # Subnet1
   ipv6_ifconfig_vlan2="2001:db8:d0:112::1 prefixlen 64" # Subnet2
   ipv6_ifconfig_vlan3="2001:db8:d0:121::1 prefixlen 64" # Subnet3
   ipv6_ifconfig_vlan4="2001:db8:d0:113::1 prefixlen 64" # Subnet4
   ipv6_ifconfig_vlan5="2001:db8:d0:114::1 prefixlen 64" # Subnet5
   ipv6_ifconfig_vlan6="2001:db8:d0:115::1 prefixlen 64" # Subnet6

   # Router advertisements
   rtadvd_interfaces="-s vlan0 vlan1 vlan2 vlan3 vlan4 vlan5 vlan6"

   ### Routing ###

   # Multicast

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006              [Page 10]

Internet-Draft       VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence          March 2006


   # RIP-ng
   ipv6_router_flags="-N dc0,dc1,dc2,dc3,vlan1,vlan2,vlan3,vlan4,vlan5,vlan6"

   --- End of configuration ---

   Note that if there was only one internal facing interface, then again
   so long as the OS supported VLAN trunking, all the VLAN IDs could be
   associated to that interface (dc1, for example).

   The VLAN IDs need to be managed by the site administrator, but would
   probably already be assigned for existing IPv4 subnets (ones into
   which IPv6 is being introduced).

   For a large enterprise, a combination of internal tunnels and VLAN
   usage could be used; the whole site need not be enabled by VLAN
   tagging alone.  This choice is one for the site administrator to

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006              [Page 11]

Internet-Draft       VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence          March 2006

Author's Address

   Tim Chown
   University of Southampton
   Southampton, Hampshire  SO17 1BJ
   United Kingdom

   Email: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006              [Page 12]

Internet-Draft       VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence          March 2006

Intellectual Property Statement

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at

Disclaimer of Validity

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an

Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).  This document is subject
   to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
   except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.


   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.

Chown                   Expires September 7, 2006              [Page 13]