IETF B. Jordan
Internet-Draft Symantec Corporation
Intended status: Informational A. Thomson
Expires: December 14, 2019 LookingGlass Cyber
J. Verma
Cisco Systems
June 12, 2019
Collaborative Automated Course of Action Operations (CACAO) for Cyber
Security
draft-jordan-cacao-charter-05
Abstract
This is the charter for the Working Group: Collaborative Automated
Course of Action Operations (CACAO) for Cyber Security
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 14, 2019.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
Jordan, et al. Expires December 14, 2019 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft CACAO June 2019
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Goals and Deliverables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1. Introduction
To defend against threat actors and their tactics, techniques, and
procedures, organizations need to manually identify, create, and
document prevention, mitigation, and remediation steps. These steps
when grouped together into a course of action playbook are used to
protect systems, networks, data, and users. The problem is, once
these steps have been created there is no standardized and structured
way to document them or easily share them across organizational
boundaries and technology stacks.
This working group will create a standard that implements the course
of action playbook model for cybersecurity operations. Each
collaborative course of action, such as recommended prevention,
mitigation and remediation steps, will consist of a sequence of cyber
defense actions that can be executed by the various systems that can
act on those actions. These courses of actions should be
referenceable by other cyber threat intelligence that provides
support for related data such as threat actors, campaigns, intrusion
sets, malware, attack patterns, and other adversarial techniques,
tactics, and procedures.
This solution will specifically enable:
1. the creation and documentation of course of action playbooks in a
structured machine-readable format
2. organizations to digitally sign course of action playbooks
3. the securely sharing and distribution of course of action
playbooks across organizational boundaries and technology stacks
4. the creation and documentation of processing instructions for
course of action playbooks in a machine readable format
.
This solution will contain at a minimum a data model specifying the
course of action playbooks; a defined set of functional capabilities
Jordan, et al. Expires December 14, 2019 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft CACAO June 2019
and associated interfaces; and an exchange protocol between products.
Where possible the working group may reuse and/or reference existing
data models, like OASIS OpenC2 and other IETF standards (e.g., I2NSF,
YANG, NETCONF, etc) that define the atomic actions to be included in
a process or sequence.
2. Goals and Deliverables
This working group has the following major goals and deliverables
o CACAO Use Cases and Requirements
* Specify the use cases and requirements
o CACAO Functional Architecture: Roles and Interfaces
* Specify the system functions and roles that are needed to
enable Collaborative Courses of Action
o CACAO Protocol Specification
* Specify and standardize the configuration for at least one
protocol that can be used to distribute courses of action in
both a direct delivery and publish-subscribe method
o CACAO JSON Data Model
* Create a JSON data model that can capture and enable
collaborative courses of action
o CACAO Interoperability Test Documents
* Define and create a series of tests and documents to assist
with interoperability of the various systems involved.
The working group may decide to not publish the use cases and
requirements; and test documents. That decision will be made during
the lifetime of the working group.
Authors' Addresses
Bret Jordan
Symantec Corporation
350 Ellis Street
Mountain View CA 94043
USA
Email: bret_jordan@symantec.com
Jordan, et al. Expires December 14, 2019 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft CACAO June 2019
Allan Thomson
LookingGlass Cyber
10740 Parkridge Blvd, Suite 200
Reston VA 20191
USA
Email: athomson@lookingglasscyber.com
Jyoti Verma
Cisco Systems
170 West Tasman Dr.
San Jose CA 95134
USA
Email: jyoverma@cisco.com
Jordan, et al. Expires December 14, 2019 [Page 4]