Internet Engineering Task Force                            S. Jacob, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                           K. Tiruveedhula
Intended status: Standards Track                        Juniper Networks
Expires: December 18, 2016                                 June 16, 2016


                 Benchmarking Methodology for PBB-EVPN
                     draft-kishjac-bmwg-pbbevpn-00

Abstract

   This document defines the methodologies for benchmarking performance
   of PBB-EVPN.PBB-EVPN is defined in RFC 7623.  It is being deployed in
   provider network.This document provides the benchmarking
   methodologies for PBB-EVPN convergance,data plane,control plane
   learning of mac.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on December 18, 2016.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.



Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016               [Page 1]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.1.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Test Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   4.  Test Procedure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.1.  Customer MAC Learning in Data Plane and B-MAC in control
           plane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.2.  MAC flush for locally learned and remote learned MAC  . .   5
     4.3.  High Availablity  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.4.  Reliablity  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.5.  Convergence Time  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.6.  Scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     4.7.  SOAK  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     4.8.  Measurement Statistics  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   5.  Test Cases  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     5.1.  MAC Learning in Control plane and Data Plane  . . . . . .   6
       5.1.1.  To check the time taken to learn the mac address in
               DUT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
       5.1.2.  To check the time taken to learn 100,000 routes from
               remote peer by DUT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       5.1.3.  To check the time taken to flush the local entry due
               to CE link failure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       5.1.4.  To check the time taken by DUT to flush 100,000
               macs learned from remote PE after R1 traffic
               generator link failure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       5.1.5.  To measure the mac ageing time. . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       5.1.6.  To check the time taken by DUT to age        from
               remote PE after stopping the traffic at remote PE.  .   9
     5.2.  Convergence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       5.2.1.  To check the time taken by DUT to learn 100,000
               routes from local       and 100,000 from remote and
               measure the time of flood from DUT. . . . . . . . . .   9
       5.2.2.  To measure the time taken to elect a new DF by adding
               a a MHPE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     5.3.  Reliability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
       5.3.1.  To check the whether there is traffic loss due to
               routing  engine failover for redundancy test. . . . .  10
       5.3.2.  To check the whether DF election is taking place
               properly  after the one of the MH PE reboot.  . . . .  11
     5.4.  Scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
       5.4.1.  To Scale the DUT to 4k PBB-EVPN instances and clear
               bgp in DUT        without traffic.  . . . . . . . . .  11
       5.4.2.  To Scale the DUT to 4k PBB-EVPN instances and clear
               bgp in DUT with traffic.  Measure the convergence
               time  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
     5.5.  Soak Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12



Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016               [Page 2]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


       5.5.1.  To Scale the DUT to 4k PBB-EVPN instances in DUT with
               traffic        and run the set up for 24hrs . . . . .  13
   6.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   7.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   8.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
   Appendix A.  Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14

1.  Introduction

   PBB-EVPN which is defined in RFC 7623 which describes procedures for
   BGP MPLS-based PBB-EVPN.This document defines the methodologies for
   benchmarking performance of PBB-EVPN.PBB-EVPN has been implemented
   with many varying designs in order to achieve their intended network
   functionality.The scope of this document is to provide methodologies
   for benchmarking pbb-evpn data, control plane mac learning, mac
   flush, mac ageing, convergence, high availablity, reliablity,scale.

1.1.  Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

2.  Test Topology























Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016               [Page 3]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


                             Topology Diagram


            | Traffic Generator
   +----------+
   |          |
   |  R1      |
   |          |
   +----------+
       |
       |
   +----------+
   |          |
   |  RR      |
   |          |
   +----------+-------------|
      |                     |
      |                     |
   +----------+       +-----------+
   |          |       |    MHPE2  |
   |   DUT    |       |           |
   |  MHPE1   |       |           |
   +----------+       +-----------+
        |                  |
   +----------+------------
   |          |
   |  CE      |
   |          |
   +----------+------------ Traffic Generator



                             Topology Diagram

                                 Figure 1

3.  Network

   The network consists of 5 routers and 2 traffic generator ports.  DUT
   is acting as one of MH PE to CE.The RR is acting as route reflector
   and core router.R1 is a Single home router running pbbevpn.  All four
   routers except CE are running mpls,bgp.  CE is a dual home connected
   to DUT and MH PE1.  The testing will be done on DUT to bench mark the
   service.DUT and MHPE2 is running PBB-EVPN with SA/AA with CE.The DUT
   and and other PE's will be running 100 PBB-EVN instances on 100 sub
   interfaces.





Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016               [Page 4]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


4.  Test Procedure

   The test defined to bench mark the performance of PBB-EVPN mac
   learning in control pland and data plane.  Mac flush,High
   Availablity, convergence time in link failures,Reliablity,scale
   scenarios.

4.1.  Customer MAC Learning in Data Plane and B-MAC in control plane

   The Customer MAC will be learned in data plane, test is to measure
   the time taken to learn the "X" number of mac's in time "T".  The
   data plane learning will from the locally connected interface.  The
   control plane learning of B-MAC is through BGP advertisements from
   the remote PE.Let the local learning time be "T" and control plane
   learning of the B-MAC time be "T'".

4.2.  MAC flush for locally learned and remote learned MAC

   The time taken to flush the "X" locally learned mac, let it be "T1"
   once the traffic is stopped.  The time taken flush the remote mac
   which learned by data plane that "X" macs when the traffic is
   stopped at remote side.Let the measured time is "T2".

4.3.  High Availablity

   The traffic is flowing bi direction.  The bgp is converged, let the
   "X" numbers of macs learned locally and remotely.  Then traffic is
   flowing at "P" packets per sec.  The traffic generator is measuring
   the Tx and Rx packets, while the routing engine failover there should
   not any packet loss the router tester must show both "P" packet per
   seconds.

4.4.  Reliablity

   This is to measure during any events like adding a new PE or
   rebooting on of the MHPE in the same ethernet segment,there should
   not any issues in DF election.  There should not be any loop.  The DF
   elction must take place in t time where 4>t>3.  The DF election must
   work on V mod N.  There should not be any loop in traffic.

4.5.  Convergence Time

   During any events like link failure, hard reset measure the time
   taken to learn "X" mac's locally and remotely or time taken to learn
   "X" mac locally and remote.






Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016               [Page 5]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


4.6.  Scale

   This is to measure the performance of DUT in scaling to "X" PBB-EVPN
   instances.  The measured parameters are CPU usage, memory
   leak,crashes.

4.7.  SOAK

   This is measuring the performance of DUT running with scaled
   configuration with traffic over a peroid of time "T'".  In each
   interval "t1" the parameters measured are CPU usage, memory usage,
   crashes.

4.8.  Measurement Statistics

   The test is repeated for "N" times and the value is taken by
   averaging the values.

5.  Test Cases

5.1.  MAC Learning in Control plane and Data Plane

   The following tests are conducted to measure mac learning local and
   remote.

5.1.1.  To check the time taken to learn the mac address in DUT

   Objective:

   To check the time taken to learn the mac address locally and time
   taken to send the locally learned routes to peers.

   a.  Send 100,000 unicast frames from CE to MHPE1(DUT) working in SA
       mode where DUT is the DF so that it can forward the traffic with
       different source and destination address,Measure the time taken
       to learn these mac in forwarding table.



   Procedure:

   Configure PBB-EVPN EVI in R1,MHPE2,DUT.All 4 routers except CE are
   running mpls,bgp,RR is acting as route reflector to R1,MHPE2 and
   DUT.Once the bgp comes up check the DUT evpn table.For MH PE ESI must
   be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT (traffic generator) to
   send the traffic to the routers.  Measurement The DUT mac table must
   learn the 100,000 mac address.  Measurement The DUT mac table must



Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016               [Page 6]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


   learn the 100,000 measure the time taken to learn the 100,000 mac
   address from locally.

5.1.2.  To check the time taken to learn 100,000 routes from remote peer
        by DUT.

   Objective:

   Send 100,000 frames with different SA and DA to DUT from R1 using
   traffic generator.  Measure the time taken to learn these 100,000
   macs from remote peer and program the mac address table.

   Procedure:

   Configure PBB-EVPN EVI in R1, MHPE2, DUT.  All 4 routers except CE
   are running mpls, bgp, RR is acting as route reflector to R1, MHPE2
   and DUT.Once the bgp comes up check the DUT mac table.  For MH PE ESI
   must be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT(traffic generator) to
   send the traffic to the routers.

   Measurement:

   The DUT mac table must learn the 100,000 measure the time taken to
   learn the 100,000 mac address from remote peers.

5.1.3.  To check the time taken to flush the local entry due to CE link
        failure

   Objective:

   Send 100,000 frames with different SA and DA to DUT from CE using
   traffic generator.  Then wait to learn all 100,000 mac address.  Then
   fail the DUT CE link and measure the time taken to flush these
   100,000 routes from the mac table.

   Procedure:

   Configure PBB-EVPN EVI in R1,MHPE2,DUT.  All 4 routers except CE are
   running mpls,bgp,RR is acting as route reflector to R1,MHPE2 and DUT.
   Once the bgp comes up check the DUT mac table.  For MH PE ESI must
   be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT(traffic generator) to send
   the traffic to the routers.

   Measurement:

   The DUT mac table must learn the 100,000 measure the time taken for
   flushing these 100,000 mac address.




Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016               [Page 7]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


5.1.4.  To check the time taken by DUT to flush 100,000 routes learned
        from remote PE after R1 traffic generator link failure

   Objective:

   Send 100,000 frames with different SA and DA to DUT from R1 using
   traffic generator.  Bring down the link between R1 and traffic
   generator.  Then measure the time taken to flush the DUT mac address
   table.

   Procedure:

   Configure PBB-EVPN EVI in R1,MHPE2,DUT.  All 4 routers except CE are
   running mpls,bgp,RR is acting as route reflector to R1,MHPE2 and
   DUT.Once the bgp comes up check the DUT mac table.For MH PE ESI must
   be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT(traffic generator) to send
   the traffic to the routers.

   Measurement:

   Measure the time taken to flush 100,000 remote routes from mac table
   of DUT.

5.1.5.  To measure the mac ageing time.

   Objective:

   Send 100,000 frames with different SA and DA to DUT from CE using
   traffic generator.  Then wait to learn all 100,000 mac address.  Then
   stop the traffic.Wait to see how long it takes to flush these mac
   entries due to ageing.

   Procedure:

   Configure PBB-EVPN EVI in R1,MHPE2,DUT.  All 4 routers except CE are
   running mpls,bgp,RR is acting as route reflector to R1,MHPE2 and
   DUT.Once the bgp comes up check the DUT mac table.  For MH PE ESI
   must be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT(traffic generator) to
   send the traffic to the routers.

   Measurement:

   The DUT mac table must learn the 100,000 measure the time taken for
   flushing these 100,000 mac address due to ageing.







Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016               [Page 8]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


5.1.6.  To check the time taken by DUT to age from remote PE after
        stopping the traffic at remote PE.

   Objective:

   Send 100,000 frames with different SA and DA to DUT from R1 using
   traffic generator.After stopping the traffic at remote PE(R1) traffic
   generator.Measure the time taken to remove these macs from DUT mac
   table.

   Procedure:

   Configure PBB-EVPN EVI in R1,MHPE2,DUT.All 4 routers except CE are
   running mpls,bgp,RR is acting as route reflector to R1,MHPE2 and
   DUT.Once the bgp comes up check the DUT mac table.For MH PE ESI must
   be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT(traffic generator) to send
   the traffic to the routers.

   Measurement:

   Measure the time taken to flush 100,000 remote macs from mac table of
   DUT due to ageing.

5.2.  Convergence

   The following tests are executed to measure the convergence time in
   case of an event or by lerning the mac without any external trigger.

5.2.1.  To check the time taken by DUT to learn 100,000 macs from
        local and 100,000 from remote and measure the time of flood from
        DUT.

   Objective:

   Send 100,000 frames with different SA and DA to DUT from R1 using
   traffic generator.  Send 100,000 frames with different SA and DA from
   traffic generator connected to CE.  The SA and DA of flows must be
   complimentary to have unicast flows.  Measure the time taken by the
   DUT to learn 200,000 in mac table.Measure the flood time period of
   DUT.

   Procedure:

   Configure PBB-EVPN EVI in R1,MHPE2,DUT.All 4 routers except CE are
   running mpls,bgp,RR is acting as route reflector to R1,MHPE2 and
   DUT.Once the bgp comes up check the DUT evpn table.  For MH PE ESI
   must be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT(traffic generator) to
   send the traffic to the routers.



Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016               [Page 9]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


   Measurement:

   Measure the time taken to learn 200,000 mac address table in DUT.
   and measure the flood time of DUT.

5.2.2.  To measure the time taken to elect a new DF by adding a a MHPE.

   Objective:

   Send 100,000 frames from CE to DUT from traffic generator with
   different SA and DA.  Wait to learn all 100,000 mac address.  Then
   add R1 to the same Ethernet segment by configuring the same ESI value
   configured in DUT,MHPE2 in IFD.  Then the new DF election take place
   during that time there should not be any loop and measure the time
   taken to come up the new DF.Measure the time taken to elect the new
   DF.

   Procedure:

   Configure PBB-EVPN EVI in R1,MHPE2,DUT.All 4 routers except CE are
   running mpls,bgp,RR is acting as route reflector to R1,MHPE2 and
   DUT.Once the bgp comes up check the DUT evpn table.  For MH PE ESI
   must be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT(traffic generator) to
   send the traffic to the routers.

   Measurement:

   Measure the time taken for new DF election in DUT and there should
   not be any loop or forwarding the BUM traffic back to the same
   segment.

5.3.  Reliability

   These tests are conducted to check after an event there wont be any
   change in functionality.

5.3.1.  To check the whether there is traffic loss due to routing engine
        failover for redundancy test.

   Objective:

   Send 100,000 frames from CE to DUT from traffic generator with
   different SA and DA.  Send 100,000 frames from traffic generator to
   R1 with different SA and DA so that 200,000 mac address will be
   learned in DUT.  There is a bi directional traffic flow with 100,000
   pps in each direction.  Then do a routing engine failover.
   Procedure:




Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016              [Page 10]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


   Configure PBB-EVPN EVI in R1,MHPE2,DUT.All 4 routers except CE are
   running mpls,bgp,RR is acting as route reflector to R1,MHPE2 and
   DUT.Once the bgp comes up check the DUT evpn table.For MH PE ESI must
   be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT(traffic generator) to send
   the traffic to the routers.

   Measurement:

   There should not be any traffic loss,No change in the DF role.  No
   withdraw of any routes.

5.3.2.  To check the whether DF election is taking place properly after
        the one of the MH PE reboot.

   Objective:

   Send 100,000 frames from CE to DUT from traffic generator with
   different SA and DA.  Send 100,000 frames from traffic generator to
   R1 with different SA and DA so that 200,000 mac address will be
   learned in DUT.  There is a bi directional traffic flow with 100,000
   pps in each direction.  Then reboot DUT since there are 2 MH PE's the
   other PE will become the DF then after DUT comes back, then DF
   election has to re initiate.

   Procedure:

   Configure PBB-EVPN EVI in R1,MHPE2,DUT.All 4 routers except CE are
   running mpls,bgp,RR is acting as route reflector to R1,MHPE2 and
   DUT.Once the bgp comes up check the DUT evpn table.For MH PE ESI must
   be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT(traffic generator) to send
   the traffic to the routers.

   Measurement

   The DF election has to take place again once the DUT comes back
   online.There should not be any DF stuck casefor 100 PBB-EVPN
   instances.

5.4.  Scale

5.4.1.  To Scale the DUT to 4k PBB-EVPN instances and clear bgp in DUT
        without traffic.

   Objective:

   The main purpose of the test the DUT performance to scale 4k PBB-EVPN
   instances.  Then clear bgp neighbor.  There should not be any loss of
   routes or any crashes.



Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016              [Page 11]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


   Procedure:

   Configure PBB-EVPN instances in R1,MHPE2,DUT.All 4 routers except CE
   are running mpls,bgp,RR is acting as route reflector to R1,MHPE2 and
   DUT.Once the bgp comes up check the DUT evpn table.For MH PE ESI must
   be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT(traffic generator) to send
   the traffic to the routers.

   Measurement

   There should not be any loss of route types 2,3 and 4 in DUT.

5.4.2.  To Scale the DUT to 4k PBB-EVPN instances and clear bgp in DUT
        with traffic.  Measure the convergence time

   Objective:

   The main purpose of the test the DUT performance to scale 4k pbb-evpn
   instances with traffic.Then clear bgp neighbor.There should not be
   any loss of routes or any crashes.  Send 100,000 frames from CE to
   DUT from traffic generator with different SA and DA for 5 pbb-evpn
   instances.Send 100,000 frames from traffic generator to R1 with
   different SA and DA for 5 pbb-evpn instances.so that 1,000,000 mac
   address will be learned in DUT.  There is a bi directional traffic
   flow with 500,000 pps in each direction.  Then clear the bgp nei in
   DUT after the bgp comes up and started learning the routes, measure
   the time taken to learn all 1,000,000 macs in DUT.

   Procedure:

   Configure PBB-EVPN instances in R1,MHPE2,DUT.All 4 routers except CE
   are running mpls,bgp,RR is acting as route reflector to R1,MHPE2 and
   DUT.Once the bgp comes up check the DUT evpn table.For MH PE ESI must
   be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT(traffic generator) to send
   the traffic to the routers.

   Measurement:

   The DUT must learn all 1,000,000 mac address.Measure the time taken
   to learn 1,000,000 mac in DUT, measure the flood traffic time "T" of
   DUT

5.5.  Soak Test








Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016              [Page 12]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


5.5.1.  To Scale the DUT to 4k PBB-EVPN instances in DUT with traffic
        and run the set up for 24hrs

   Objective:

   Configure PBB-EVPN instances in R1,MHPE2,DUT.All 4 routers except CE
   are running mpls,bgp,RR is acting as route reflector to R1,MHPE2 and
   DUT.Once the bgp comes up check the DUT evpn table.For MH PE ESI must
   be configured per IFD/Interface.  Using RT(traffic generator) to send
   the traffic to the routers.

   Procedure:


   Measurement:

   Take the hourly reading of CPU,process memory.There should not be any
   leak,crashes,CPU spikes.

6.  Acknowledgements

   We would like to thank Al Morton of (ATT) for their support and
   encouragement.  We would like to thank Fioccola Giuseppe of Telecom
   Italia reviewing our draft and commenting it.

7.  IANA Considerations

   This memo includes no request to IANA.

8.  Security Considerations

   There is no additional consideration from RFC 6192.

9.  References

9.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC2544]  Bradner, S. and J. McQuaid, "Benchmarking Methodology for
              Network Interconnect Devices", RFC 2544,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2544, March 1999,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2544>.





Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016              [Page 13]


Internet-Draft      PBB-EVPN Benchmarking Methodology          June 2016


9.2.  Informative References

   [RFC7432]  Sajassi, A., Ed., Aggarwal, R., Bitar, N., Isaac, A.,
              Uttaro, J., Drake, J., and W. Henderickx, "BGP MPLS-Based
              Ethernet VPN", RFC 7432, DOI 10.17487/RFC7432, February
              2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7432>.

Appendix A.  Appendix

Authors' Addresses

   Sudhin Jacob (editor)
   Juniper Networks
   Bangalore
   India

   Phone: +91 8061212543
   Email: sjacob@juniper.net


   Kishore Tiruveedhula
   Juniper Networks
   10 Technology Park Dr
   Westford, MA  01886
   USA

   Phone: +1 9785898861
   Email: kishoret@juniper.net























Jacob & Tiruveedhula    Expires December 18, 2016              [Page 14]