Inter-Domain Routing P. Lapukhov Internet-Draft Facebook Intended status: Standards Track October 31, 2016 Expires: May 4, 2017 Use of BGP for dissemination of ILA mapping information draft-lapukhov-bgp-ila-afi-02 Abstract Identifier-Locator Addressing [I-D.herbert-nvo3-ila] relies on splitting the 128-bit IPv6 address into identifier and locator parts to implement identifier mobility, and network virtualization. This document proposes a method for distributing the identifier to locator mapping information using Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 [RFC4760]. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on May 4, 2017. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Lapukhov Expires May 4, 2017 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft draft-lapukhov-bgp-ila-afi October 2016 (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. BGP ILA AFI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Capability Advertisement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Disseminating Identifier-Locator mapping information . . . . 3 4.1. Advertising ILA mapping information . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4.2. Withdrawing ILA mapping information . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5. Interpreting the mapping information . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.1. Unicast SAFI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.2. Multicast SAFI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6. Inter-domain mapping exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 7. BGP Next-Hop attribute handling with ILA . . . . . . . . . . 6 8. Use of Add-Paths extension with ILA AFI . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 10. Manageability Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 12. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 13. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 13.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 13.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1. Introduction Under the ILA proposal, IPv6 address is split in 64-bit identifier (lower address bits) and locator (higher address bits) portions. The locator part is determined dynamically from a mapping table that maintains associations between the location-independent identifiers and topologically significant locators. The hosts that collectively implement and maintain such mappings are referred to as "ILA domain" in this document. The ILA domain has a globally unique 64-bit SIR (Standard Identifier Representation) prefix assigned to it (see [I-D.herbert-nvo3-ila] for more details on SIR prefix use). This document proposes a new address family identifier (AFI) for the purpose of disseminating the locator-identifier mappings among the nodes participating in the ILA domain. For example, this extension could be used to propagate the mappings from ILA hosts to ILA routers and allow the routers to perform their function (see Lapukhov Expires May 4, 2017 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft draft-lapukhov-bgp-ila-afi October 2016 [I-D.herbert-nvo3-ila] for definition of the "ILA router" functions). Additional information that provides more detailed examples of deployment scenarios using BGP could be found in [I-D.lapukhov-ila-deployment]. 2. BGP ILA AFI This document introduces a new AFI known as a "Identifier-Locator Addressing AFI" (ILA AFI) with the actual value to be assigned by IANA. The purpose of this AFI is disseminating the mapping information in the ILA domain, e.g. between ILA hosts and ILA routers. This document defines the use of SAFI values of "1" (unicast) and "2" (multicast) only. 3. Capability Advertisement A BGP speaker that wishes to exchange ILA mapping information MUST use the Multiprotocol Extensions Capability Code, as defined in [RFC4760], to advertise the corresponding AFI/SAFI pair. 4. Disseminating Identifier-Locator mapping information 4.1. Advertising ILA mapping information For the purpose of ILA mapping encoding, the 8-octet locator field SHALL be encoded in the "next-hop address" field. The "length of the next-hop address" MUST be set to "8". The identifiers bound to the locator SHALL be encoded within the NLRI portion of MP_REACH_NLRI attribute. The NLRI portion of MP_REACH_NLRI starts with the two- octet "Length of identifiers" field, with the value being multiple of 8. The rest of the NLRI is a collection of 8-octet identifiers that are bound to the locator specified in the "next-hop address" field. Lapukhov Expires May 4, 2017 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft draft-lapukhov-bgp-ila-afi October 2016 +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Address Family Identifier (2 octets) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Subsequent Address Family Identifier (1 octet) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Length of Next Hop Address (1 octet, set to "8") | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Locator value (8 octets) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Reserved (1 octet), must be zero | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Length of NLRI field (2 octets, multiple of 8) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Identifiers (variable, 8 octets each) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Figure 1: MP_REACH_NLRI Layout 4.2. Withdrawing ILA mapping information Withdrawal of ILA mapping information is performed via an MP_UNREACH_NLRI attribute advertisement organized as following: +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Address Family Identifier (2 octets) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Subsequent Address Family Identifier (1 octet) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Length of witdrawn identifiers (2 octets) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Identifiers (variable, 8 octets each) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Figure 2: MP_UNREACH_NLRI Layout 5. Interpreting the mapping information 5.1. Unicast SAFI Only the locator part of ILA address is used for packet routing, and every node that hosts an identifier is expected to have a unique /64 prefix routable within the scope of the ILA domain. The identifiers advertised under the ILA AFI are expected to be used by the data- plane implementation to perform match on a full IPv6 address and decide whether the locator portion of the address needs a re-write. It is up to the implementation to decide which full 128-bit IPv6 addresses need a rewrite, e.g. by matching on a Standard Identifier Representation (SIR) prefix as defined in [I-D.herbert-nvo3-ila]. Lapukhov Expires May 4, 2017 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft draft-lapukhov-bgp-ila-afi October 2016 The locator rewrite information comes from the next-hop "address" associated with the identifier. The next-hop field of MP_REACH_NLRI attribute in general is not expected to be used for any routing resolutions/lookups by the BGP process. It should primarily be used to create a rewrite rule in the data-plane forwarding table. The actual forwarding decision is then based on subsequent lookup in the forwarding table to find the next hop to send the packet to. In some scenarios, resolving the next-hop attribute via additional lookups tables might be necessary. For example, for environments that deploy MPLS ([RFC3031]) forwarding, the locator may resolve to a label stack that is required to perform further forwarding. In this case, the ILA address rewrite will be accompanied by additional actions, such as label stack imposition. These decisions have to be made in implementation dependant fashion. 5.2. Multicast SAFI Multicast SAFI retain the same encoding format, with a different SAFI value. For multicast packets, the RPF check process SHALL be modified for use with ILA source addresses. Specifically, source ILA IPv6 addresses with the identifier portion matching the mapping table SHALL be mapped to proper locator, prior to performing the RPF check. The ILA source addresses need to be identified by some means specific to ILA implementation, e.g. by matching on configured SIR prefixes. The ILA addresses that do not match any mapping entry SHALL be considered as failing the RPF check. 6. Inter-domain mapping exchange The ILA mappings are only unique with an ILA domain - it is possible that different domains may re-use the same identifiers. To make identifiers globally unique, they MUST be concatenated with the SIR prefix assigned to each ILA domain. These globally unique identifiers may then be exchanged between multiple ILA domains. IANA will be requested to allocate new SAFI value called "VPN-ILA" SAFI to facilitate exchange of inter-domain ILA mappings. The MP_REACH_NLRI attributes exchanged over this SAFI will look as following: Lapukhov Expires May 4, 2017 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft draft-lapukhov-bgp-ila-afi October 2016 +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Address Family Identifier (2 octets) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Subsequent Address Family Identifier (1 octet) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | SIR prefix (8 octets) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Length of Next Hop Address (1 octet, set to "8") | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Locator value (8 octets) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Reserved (1 octet), must be zero | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Length of NLRI field (2 octets, multiple of 8) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Identifiers (variable, 8 octets each) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ The main difference from the Unicast/Multicast SAFI's is presence of the SIR prefix field in the announcement. Correspondingly, the MP_UNREACH_NLRI will look as following: +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Address Family Identifier (2 octets) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Subsequent Address Family Identifier (1 octet) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | SIR Prefix (8 bytes) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Length of witdrawn identifiers (2 octets) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Identifiers (variable, 8 octets each) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ The use of domain-specific identifiers would require the ILA hosts and routers to make their ILA cache lookups based on the full 128-bit prefix. 7. BGP Next-Hop attribute handling with ILA This document proposes that the BGP next-hop attribute value encode the locator associated with all identifiers found in MP_REACH_NLRI attribute. It is possible that an intermediate speaker may change the next-hop value. This may be required to ensure all traffic for the associated identifiers is routed through that intermediate speaker. The speaker is expected to maintain the original ILA mappings in its mapping table, and perform additional destination Lapukhov Expires May 4, 2017 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft draft-lapukhov-bgp-ila-afi October 2016 address translation for the ILA packets. This way, a form of loose hop traffic engineering could be realized within an ILA domain. It is common that BGP implementations reset the next-hop value for announcements made over eBGP sessions. Such scenario may be common between two different ILA domains. 8. Use of Add-Paths extension with ILA AFI It could be useful to bind multiple locators to the same identifier, e.g. for the purpose of load-sharing. To make announcing multiple locators possible, the MP_REACH_NLRI and MP_REACH_NLRI attributes are extended to encode the path-identifier per [I-D.ietf-idr-add-paths], correspondingly enabling the capability for the AFI/SAFI. Specifically, the NLRI field will look as following: +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Path identifier (4 octets) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Length of NLRI field (2 octets, multiple of 8) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Identifiers (variable, 8 octets each) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Such encoding instructs the receiver to create multiple locator entries for an identifier, differentiated by their path identifiers. Optionally, a weight could be associated with each path using the "link bandwidth" extended community defined in [I-D.ietf-idr-link-bandwidth] 9. IANA Considerations For the purpose of this work, IANA would be asked to allocate a value for the new AFI, and the VPN-ILA SAFI. 10. Manageability Considerations The ILA mappings distribution is likely to be done using separate infrastructure, independent from the BGP topology used for regular routing information distribution. Most likely there will be a collection of iBGP route-reflectors deployed within each ILA domain, and peering with a BGP process running on each ILA router and ILA host. More details and deployment examples could be found in [I-D.lapukhov-ila-deployment]. Lapukhov Expires May 4, 2017 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft draft-lapukhov-bgp-ila-afi October 2016 11. Security Considerations This document does not introduce any changes in terms of BGP security. Defining ILA security model is outside of scope of this document. 12. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Doug Porter for the original idea and discussion of this proposal. 13. References 13.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC3031] Rosen, E., Viswanathan, A., and R. Callon, "Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture", RFC 3031, DOI 10.17487/RFC3031, January 2001, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3031>. [RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>. [I-D.ietf-idr-add-paths] Walton, D., Retana, A., Chen, E., and J. Scudder, "Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP", draft-ietf-idr- add-paths-15 (work in progress), May 2016. [I-D.ietf-idr-link-bandwidth] Mohapatra, P. and R. Fernando, "BGP Link Bandwidth Extended Community", draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth-06 (work in progress), January 2013. 13.2. Informative References [RFC4760] Bates, T., Chandra, R., Katz, D., and Y. Rekhter, "Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4", RFC 4760, DOI 10.17487/RFC4760, January 2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4760>. Lapukhov Expires May 4, 2017 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft draft-lapukhov-bgp-ila-afi October 2016 [I-D.herbert-nvo3-ila] Herbert, T., "Identifier-locator addressing for IPv6", draft-herbert-nvo3-ila-03 (work in progress), October 2016. [I-D.lapukhov-ila-deployment] Lapukhov, P., "Deploying Identifier-Locator Addressing (ILA) in datacenter", draft-lapukhov-ila-deployment-00 (work in progress), March 2016. Author's Address Petr Lapukhov Facebook 1 Hacker Way Menlo Park, CA 94025 US Email: petr@fb.com Lapukhov Expires May 4, 2017 [Page 9]