Network Working Group B. Leiba Internet Draft IBM T.J. Watson Research Center Document: draft-leiba-imap-idle-01.txt February 1997 IMAP4 IDLE command Status of this Memo This document is an Internet Draft. Internet Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its Areas, and its Working Groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet Drafts. Internet Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months. Internet Drafts may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is not appropriate to use Internet Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as a ``working draft'' or ``work in progress''. To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the 1id-abstracts.txt listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow Directories on ds.internic.net, nic.nordu.net, ftp.isi.edu, or munnari.oz.au. A revised version of this draft document will be submitted to the RFC editor as a Proposed Standard for the Internet Community. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. This document will expire before August 1997. Distribution of this draft is unlimited. 1. Abstract The Internet Message Access Protocol [IMAP4] requires a client to poll the server for changes to the selected mailbox (new mail, deletions). It's often more desirable to have the server transmit updates to the client in real time. This allows a user to see new mail immediately. It also helps some real-time applications based on IMAP, which might otherwise need to poll extremely often (such as every few seconds). (While the spec actually does allow a server to push EXISTS responses aysynchronously, a client can't expect this behaviour and must poll.) B. Leiba [Page 1]
Internet DRAFT IDLE February 26, 1997 This document specifies the syntax of an IDLE command, which will allow a client to tell the server that it's ready to accept such real-time updates. 2. Conventions Used in this Document In examples, "C:" and "S:" indicate lines sent by the client and server respectively. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", and "MAY" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2060 [IMAP4]. 3. Specification IDLE Command Arguments: none Responses: continuation data will be requested; the client sends the continuation data "DONE" to end the command Result: OK - IDLE completed after client sent "DONE" NO - failure: the server will not allow the IDLE command at this time BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid The IDLE command may be used with any IMAP4 server implementation that returns "IDLE" as one of the supported capabilities to the CAPABILITY command. If the server does not advertise the IDLE capability, the client MUST NOT use the IDLE command and must poll for mailbox updates. In particular, the client MUST continue to be able to accept unsolicited untagged responses to ANY command, as specified in the base IMAP specification. The IDLE command is sent from the client to the server when the client is ready to accept unsolicited mailbox update messages. The server requests a response to the IDLE command using the continuation ("+") response. The IDLE command remains active until the client responds to the continuation, and as long as an IDLE command is active, the server is now free to send untagged EXISTS, EXPUNGE, and other messages at any time. The IDLE command is terminated by the receipt of a "DONE" continuation from the client; such response satisfies the server's continuation request. At that point, the server MAY send any remaining queued untagged responses and then MUST immediately send the tagged response to the IDLE command and prepare to process other commands. As in the base specification, the processing of any new command may cause the sending of unsolicited untagged responses, subject to the ambiguity limitations. B. Leiba [Page 2]
Internet DRAFT IDLE February 26, 1997 The server MAY consider a client inactive if it has an IDLE command running, and if such a server has an inactivity timeout it MAY log the client off implicitly at the end of its timeout period. Because of that, clients using IDLE are advised to terminate the IDLE and re-issue it at least every 29 minutes to avoid being logged off. This still allows a client to receive immediate mailbox updates even though it need only "poll" at half hour intervals. Example: C: A001 SELECT INBOX S: * FLAGS (\Deleted \Seen) S: * 3 EXISTS S: * 0 RECENT S: * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1] S: A001 OK SELECT completed C: A002 IDLE S: + idling ...time passes; new mail arrives... S: * 4 EXISTS C: DONE S: A002 OK IDLE terminated ...another client expunges message 2 now... C: A003 FETCH 4 ALL S: * 4 FETCH (...) S: A003 OK FETCH completed C: A004 IDLE S: * 2 EXPUNGE S: * 3 EXISTS S: + idling ...time passes; another client expunges message 3... S: * 3 EXPUNGE S: * 2 EXISTS ...time passes; new mail arrives... S: * 3 EXISTS C: DONE S: A004 OK IDLE terminated C: A005 FETCH 3 ALL S: * 3 FETCH (...) S: A005 OK FETCH completed C: A006 IDLE B. Leiba [Page 3]
Internet DRAFT IDLE February 26, 1997 4. Formal Syntax The following syntax specification uses the augmented Backus-Naur Form (BNF) notation as specified in [RFC-822] as modified by [IMAP4]. Non-terminals referenced but not defined below are as defined by [IMAP4]. command_auth ::= append / create / delete / examine / list / lsub / rename / select / status / subscribe / unsubscribe / idle ;; Valid only in Authenticated or Selected state idle ::= "IDLE" CRLF "DONE" 5. References [IMAP4] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol - Version 4rev1", RFC 2060 6. Security Considerations There are no known security issues with this extension. 7. Author's Address Barry Leiba IBM T.J. Watson Research Center 30 Saw Mill River Road Hawthorne, NY 10532 Email: leiba@watson.ibm.com B. Leiba [Page 4]