Global Routing Operations Y. Liu
Internet Draft China Mobile
Intended status: Standards Track C. Lin
Expires: August 19, 2025 New H3C Technologies
T. Graf
Swisscom
P. Lucente
NTT
February 19, 2025
Using BMP over QUIC connection
draft-liu-grow-bmp-over-quic-02
Abstract
The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) provides a convenient interface
for obtaining route views by monitoring BGP sessions. BMP operates
over TCP and is unidirectional (from client to server). QUIC
provides multiple simultaneous streams to carry data in one
direction, enabling much better efficiency and performance for both
peers, in particular unidirectional streams can provide reverse data
protection for the sender. QUIC also provides shorter handshake and
includes TLS. This document describes how to use BMP over the QUIC
transport protocol, named BMPoQUIC.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 19, 2025.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Liu, et al. Expire August 19, 2025 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Using BMP over QUIC connection February 2025
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this
document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in
Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without
warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction...................................................2
2. Terminology and Definitions....................................3
3. Connection Management..........................................4
3.1. Connection Establishment..................................4
3.2. Connection Termination....................................4
3.2.1. QUIC Connection Termination Process..................4
3.2.2. BMPoQUIC Considerations for Connection Termination...4
4. Stream mapping and usage.......................................4
4.1. Multi-stream Selection....................................5
4.1.1. Peer Stream..........................................5
4.1.2. Per-AFI/SAFI Stream without Control Stream...........6
4.1.3. Per-AFI/SAFI Stream with Control Stream..............7
5. Endpoint Authentication........................................8
6. Operational Considerations.....................................8
7. IANA Considerations............................................9
8. Security Considerations........................................9
9. References.....................................................9
9.1. Normative References......................................9
9.2. Informative References...................................10
Authors' Addresses...............................................11
1. Introduction
The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) [RFC7854] defines a standard
mechanisms for obtaining route views by monitoring BGP sessions. BMP
operation uses TCP as its transport protocol to provide reliable
communication. BMP establishes connection relationships between
monitored router and monitoring station using a TCP session.
In BMP message communication, in order to simplify the
implementation, only the monitored router reports messages to the
monitoring station, and the station does not send messages to the
router [RFC7854]. In other words, the BMP communication is actually
Liu, et al. Expires August 19, 2025 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Using BMP over QUIC connection February 2025
unidirectional (from router to station). As a consequence, the
direction from the monitoring station to the monitored router may be
used as an interface for malicious attacks on the router. As BMP
supports more and more types of routes to be reported, the number of
reported BMP messages is also increasing, which also brings huge
challenges to TCP data transmission pressure.
QUIC [RFC9000] is a UDP-based multiplexed and secure transport
protocol that provides connection-oriented and stateful interaction
between a client and server. It can provide low latency and
encrypted transport with resilient connections.
QUIC uses multiple simultaneous streams to carry data in one
direction. Each stream is a separate unidirectional or bidirectional
channel consisting of an ordered stream of bytes. In Addition, each
stream has its own flow control, which limit bytes sent on a stream,
together with flow control of the connection. Among them, the
unidirectional stream is very consistent with the message
transmission mechanism of BMP.
Therefore, QUIC is a proper transport protocol for the message
transmission mechanism of BMP. This document specifies how to use
QUIC as the secure transport protocol for BMP.
2. Terminology and Definitions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
In this document, the terms "client" and "server" are used to refer
to the two ends of the QUIC connection. The client actively
initiates the QUIC connection. The terms "monitored router" and
"monitoring station" are used to refer to the two ends of the BMP
session. The router sends BMP messages to the station, but the
station does not respond to the router.
* Client: The endpoint that initiates a QUIC connection, the BMP
monitored router.
* Server: The endpoint that accepts a QUIC connection, the BMP
monitoring station.
Liu, et al. Expires August 19, 2025 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Using BMP over QUIC connection February 2025
3. Connection Management
3.1. Connection Establishment
QUIC connection establishment is described in [RFC9000]. During
establishing connection, BMPoQUIC support is indicated by selecting
the Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) [RFC7301] token as
listed in the IANA sectionSection 7 in the TLS handshake.
The monitored router MUST also act as the client meanwhile the
monitoring station must also act as the server.
The monitored router should be the initiator of the QUIC connection
to the monitoring station meanwhile the monitoring station acts as a
connection acceptor.
3.2. Connection Termination
3.2.1. QUIC Connection Termination Process
The typical QUIC connection termination process is described in
[RFC9000].
3.2.2. BMPoQUIC Considerations for Connection Termination
When a BMP session is implemented based on a QUIC connection, the
idle timeout should be disabled or the QUIC max_idle_timeout should
be set appropriately in order to keep the QUIC connection persistent
even if the BMP session is idle.
When a BMP monitoring station receives a termination message, it
will graceful close the BMP session. The station SHOULD close the
associated QUIC connection.
When a BMP monitored router is detecting the interruption of the
QUIC connection, it SHOULD send a termination message to the BMP
monitoring station.
4. Stream mapping and usage
There are seven kinds of BMP main message sent from monitored router
to monitoring station, namely route monitoring message, statistics
report message, peer down notification message, peer up notification
message, initiation message, termination message and route mirroring
message [RFC7854]. The seven kinds of BMP messages need to be mapped
into QUIC streams.
Liu, et al. Expires August 19, 2025 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Using BMP over QUIC connection February 2025
QUIC [RFC9000] is a UDP-based multiplexed and secure transport
protocol that provides connection-oriented and stateful interaction
between a client and server. It can provide low latency and
encrypted transport with resilient connections.
QUIC uses Stream ID to identify the stream. The least significant
bit (0x1) of the stream ID identifies the initiator of the stream.
The second least significant bit (0x2) of the stream ID
distinguishes between bidirectional streams (with the bit set to 0)
and unidirectional streams.
No BMP message is ever sent from the monitoring station to the
monitored router. The monitored router MAY take steps to prevent the
monitoring station from sending data or it MAY silently discard any
data sent by the monitoring station. So BMP messages from monitored
router SHOULD be mapped into unidirectional stream whose stream type
is 0x2 according to the above.
4.1. Multi-stream Selection
4.1.1. Peer Stream
When a router has many peers and a large number of routes, if the
related BMP messages are reported through an independent stream, the
communication pressure of this stream will be very large and the
efficiency will be very low. In order to reduce the communication
pressure and improve the communication efficiency, multiple streams
can be allocated according to the number of peers of the router, and
each stream is used to transmit the BMP message of the specified
peers, as shown in Figure 1. The number of streams can be configured
as needed.
+------------+ +--------------+
| Peer 1 | | |
| |---------------------->| Stream 1 |
| Peer 2 | | |
+------------+ +--------------+
~ ~
~ ~
+------------+ +--------------+
| Peer x | | |
| |---------------------->| Stream n |
| Peer y | | |
+------------+ +--------------+
Figure 1: Peer Stream Structure
When multiple peer streams are used to transmit BMP messages, each
stream needs to transmit peer-insensitive BMP messages (that is, BMP
Liu, et al. Expires August 19, 2025 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Using BMP over QUIC connection February 2025
messages that do not carry the per-peer header format) to ensure the
order of BMP messages. Peer-insensitive BMP messages include
Initiation Message and Termination Message [RFC7854].
4.1.2. Per-AFI/SAFI Stream without Control Stream
If multiple peer streams are used, each stream may carry different
type (AFI/SAFI) routes from router, which may make the information
seem a bit messy. So unidirectional QUIC streams can be created for
Per-AFI/SAFI to carry the routes of the specific AFI/SAFI, as shown
in the figure below.
+----------------+ +--------------+
| AFI/SAFI 1 |---------------------->| Stream 1 |
+----------------+ +--------------+
~ ~
~ ~
+----------------+ +--------------+
| AFI/SAFI n |---------------------->| Stream n |
+----------------+ +--------------+
Figure 2: Per AFI/SAFI Stream Structure
When per-AFI/SAFI streams are used to transmit BMP messages, it is
necessary to distinguish which BMP messages can be categorized by
per-AFI/SAFI and Determine how to send BMP messages for non-per-
AFI/SAFI.
* For Initiation Message and Termination Message, they are all non-
per-AFI/SAFI message, but they are messages necessary for session
connection, so each Per-AFI/SAFI stream needs to send them.
* For Route Monitoring message, it is per-AFI/SAFI route message,
and it can be carried over corresponding AFI/SAFI stream.
* For Route Mirroring message, if the message includes BGP PDU and
the BGP PDU can distinguish AFI/SAFI information, it could be
carried over corresponding AFI/SAFI stream. If not, it should be
carried over any one of AFI/SAFI streams.
* For Statistics Report message, if the stat type is based on per-
AFI/SAFI, it could be carried over corresponding AFI/SAFI stream. If
not, it should be carried over any one of AFI/SAFI streams.
* For Peer up Notification message, it could include open message of
one AFI/SAFI, and it should be carried over corresponding AFI/SAFI
stream.
Liu, et al. Expires August 19, 2025 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Using BMP over QUIC connection February 2025
* For Peer down Notification message, as it does not include
AFI/SAFI information, it should be carried over all corresponding
AFI/SAFI streams which carry Peer up Notification message.
If BGP still uses TCP as the transport protocol, the Per AFI/SAFI
Stream structure can be used selectively. If BGP uses QUIC as the
transport protocol [I-D.draft-retana-idr-bgp-quic], the Per AFI/SAFI
Stream structure MUST be used because of the implementation that
per-AFI/SAFI streams (function channels) are used to carry routing
information in one BGP over QUIC (BoQ) connection.
4.1.3. Per-AFI/SAFI Stream with Control Stream
Like the design of BGP over QUIC (BoQ) [I-D.draft-retana-idr-bgp-
quic], the per-peer or per-AFI/SAFI streams (function channels) and
the associated control mechanism (control channel) for the session
are called "BMP channels". In one BMP over QUIC (BMPoQUIC)
connection, one control channel and one or more function channels
are used to carry BMP information, as shown in the figure below.
+------------------------+ +--------------+
| Control Channel |-------------->| Stream 1 |
+------------------------+ +--------------+
+------------------------+ +--------------+
| Function Channel 1 |-------------->| Stream 2 |
+------------------------+ +--------------+
~ ~
~ ~
+------------------------+ +--------------+
| Function Channel n |-------------->| Stream n |
+------------------------+ +--------------+
Figure 3: BMP Channel Structure
On a BMPoQUIC connection, the BMPoQUIC client first establishes a
unidirectional stream for the "BMP control channel". The control
channel is used to send the associated status control information,
such as BMP session state control messages (Initiation Message and
Termination Message) and BGP peer relationship state control
messages (Peer up Notification message and Peer down Notification
message).
As the Peer up Notification message is sent over the control
channel, the BMPoQUIC client may create function channels for the
peer by using unidirectional QUIC streams. These function channels
are used to carry the relevant information for specific peer or
AFI/SAFI.
Liu, et al. Expires August 19, 2025 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Using BMP over QUIC connection February 2025
These function channels include one Per-Peer Non-Per-AFI/SAFI
function channel and several Per-Peer Per-AFI/SAFI function
channels.
The Per-Peer Non-Per-AFI/SAFI function channel can be used to carry
messages only related to peer and not to AFI/SAFI, such as Route
Mirroring message without AFI/SAFI (if it cannot get AFI/SAFI) and
Statistics Report message without AFI/SAFI (the Stat Type with not
specifying Per-AFI/SAFI).
The Per-Peer Per-AFI/SAFI function channel can be used to transmit
messages only related to AFI/SAFI for a specific peer, such as Route
Monitoring message, Route Mirroring message with AFI/SAFI (if it can
get AFI/SAFI from BGP Message) and Statistics Report message with
AFI/SAFI (the Stat Type with specifying Per-AFI/SAFI).
As a Peer down Notification message is sent over the control
channel, the router SHALL close all the related function channels.
In the future, the Peer down Notification message may be expanded to
include AFI/SAFI information, allowing the router to close the
function channel of the specified AFI/SAFI for a peer.
According to [RFC7854], Initiation Message MUST be sent as the first
message after the BMP session comes up. So it must be ensured that
the Initiation message is the first message sent on each BMP
channel, meaning that an Initiation message must be sent first for
every BMP channel establishment.
5. Endpoint Authentication
BMPoQUIC uses QUIC which uses TLS version 1.3 or greater. Therefore,
the TLS handshake process can be used for BMPoQUIC endpoint
authentication. A third-party authentication mechanism can also be
applied for BMPoQUIC endpoint authentication, such as a TLS client
certificate.
6. Operational Considerations
The decision to use BMPoQUIC instead of the TCP-based mechanism in
[RFC7854] is an operational decision, and an implementation MUST
provide a configuration mechanism to enable BMPoQUIC on the BMP
session.
Some connectivity problems (such as blocking UDP) could result in a
failure to establish a QUIC connection. When this happens, monitored
router SHOULD attempt to establish a TCP-based BMP session.
Liu, et al. Expires August 19, 2025 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Using BMP over QUIC connection February 2025
7. IANA Considerations
This document creates a new registration for the identification of
BMPoQUIC in the "Application Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN)
Protocol IDs registry established in [RFC7301].
The "BMPoQ" string identifies BMPoQUIC:
* Protocol: BMPoQUIC
* Identification Sequence: 0x42 0x4d 0x50 0x6f 0x51 ("BMPoQ")
* Specification: This document
8. Security Considerations
This document replaces the transport protocol layer of BMP from TCP
to QUIC. The basic protocol specification of BMP is not modified,
and therefore the new security risks are not introduced to the basic
BMP protocol. BMPoQUIC enhances transport-layer security for BMP
session according to [RFC9000].
This document does not require to support third-party authentication
(e.g., backend Authentication) due to the fact that TLS does not
specify this way of authentication. If third-party authentication is
needed, TLS client certificates are recommended to be used here.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI
10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC7854] Scudder, J., Ed., Fernando, R., and S. Stuart, "BGP
Monitoring Protocol (BMP)", RFC 7854, DOI
10.17487/RFC7854, June 2016, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc7854>.
[RFC9000] Iyengar, J., Ed. and M. Thomson, Ed., "QUIC: A UDP-Based
Multiplexed and Secure Transport", RFC 9000, DOI
10.17487/RFC9000, May 2021, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc9000>.
Liu, et al. Expires August 19, 2025 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Using BMP over QUIC connection February 2025
9.2. Informative References
[RFC7301] Friedl, S., Popov, A., Langley, A., and E. Stephan,
"Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application-Layer Protocol
Negotiation Extension", RFC 7301, DOI 10.17487/RFC7301,
July 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7301>.
[I-D.draft-retana-idr-bgp-quic]
Retana, A., Qu, Y., Haas, J., Chen, S., and J. Tantsura,
"BGP over QUIC", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
retana-idr-bgp-quic-05, 7 July 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-retana-idr-
bgp-quic-05>.
Liu, et al. Expires August 19, 2025 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Using BMP over QUIC connection February 2025
Authors' Addresses
Yisong Liu
China Mobile
China
Email: liuyisong@chinamobile.com
Changwang Lin
New H3C Technologies
Beijing
China
Email: linchangwang.04414@h3c.com
Thomas Graf
Swisscom
Binzring 17
CH- Zurich 8045
Switzerland
Email: thomas.graf@swisscom.com
Paolo Lucente
NTT
Veemweg 23
3771 Barneveld
Netherlands
Email: paolo@ntt.net
Liu, et al. Expires August 19, 2025 [Page 11]