CCAMP G. Martinelli, Ed.
Internet-Draft Cisco
Intended status: Standards Track A. Zanardi, Ed.
Expires: January 14, 2014 CREATE-NET
X. Zhang, Ed.
Huawei Technologies
G. Galimberti
Cisco
D. Siracusa
CREATE-NET
July 13, 2013
Information Encoding for WSON with Impairments Validation
draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode-02
Abstract
Impairment-Aware (IA) Routing and Wavelength Assignment (RWA)
function might be required in Wavelength Switched Optical Networks
(WSON) that already support RWA. This document defines proper
encoding to support this operation. It goes in addition to the
available impairment-free WSON encoding and it is fully compatible
with it.
As the information model, the encoding is independent from control
plane architectures and protocol implementations. Its definitions
can be used in related protocol extensions.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 14, 2014.
Copyright Notice
Martinelli, et al. Expires January 14, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Encoding WSON Info Model with Impairments July 2013
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Optical Parameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2. Impairment Vector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.3. Impairment Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Contributing Authors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1. Introduction
In case of WSON where optical impairments play a significant role,
the framework document [RFC6566] defines related control plane
architectural options for Impairment Aware Routing and Wavelength
Assignment (IA-RWA). This document provides a suitable encoding for
the related WSON impairment information model as defined
[I-D.martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info].
This document directly refers to ITU recommendations [ITU.G680] and
[ITU.G697] as already detailed in the information model.
1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Martinelli, et al. Expires January 14, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Encoding WSON Info Model with Impairments July 2013
2. Encoding
2.1. Optical Parameter
The OPTICAL_PARAM is defined as a sub TLV object.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|S| Reserved | ParamSource | ParamID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Variance |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The following flag is defined:
S. Standard bit. S=1 indentifies a set of parameters standardized
by ITU; while S=0 identifies a non-standardized set of parameters.
With the flag S=1 the following parameters are defined:
ParamSource. Where this parameter is defined. Currently only
[ITU.G697] has defined this with value 1.
ParamID. Parameter identifier according to the source.
[ITU.G697] table V.3 defines the following identifiers:
1. Total Power (dBm)
2. Channel Power (dBm)
3. Reserved (Defined in [ITU.G697] but not used)
4. Reserved (Defined in [ITU.G697] but not used)
5. OSNR (db)
6. Q Factor (a pure number)
7. PMD (ps)
8. Residual Chromatic Dispersion (ps/nm)
Value. Value for the parameter. As defined by [ITU.G697], it is
a 32 bit IEEE floating point number.
Martinelli, et al. Expires January 14, 2014 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Encoding WSON Info Model with Impairments July 2013
Variance. Variance for the parameter, a 32 bit IEEE floating
point number.
2.2. Impairment Vector
This sub-TLV is a list of optical parameters and they MAY have a
wavelength dependency information.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0| Reserved | Number of Parameters |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Optical Param sub-TLV(s) |
: |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Where:
W = 0. Wavelength Dependency flag. There is no wavelength
dependency.
Number of Parameters contained in this vector.
Optical Param sub-TLV(s) present a list of Object as defined in
Section 2.1.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|1| Reserved | Number of Parameters |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Label Set |
: :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Optical Param sub-TLV(s) |
: |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Where:
W = 1. Wavelength Dependency flag. There is wavelength
dependency.
The Label Set object is defined in
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode] Section 2.1. Likely an
Martinelli, et al. Expires January 14, 2014 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Encoding WSON Info Model with Impairments July 2013
inclusive range will be the only option required by the Action
defined in the Label Set.
2.3. Impairment Matrix
As defined by the [I-D.martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info], the impairment
matrix follows the same structure as the connectivity matrix.
[Xian's note]: (1) Similar problem as mentioned above applies, the
structure differs when N is set to different values; so they should
be described separately; (2) I would prefer the "W" stay with the
previous structure. (3) Since the format of impairment matrix does
not follow exactly as the connectivity matrix. i would suggest
revising the sentence above to reflect this.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Connectivity | MatrixID | Reserved |0|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Link Set A #1 |
: : :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Link Set B #1 |
: : :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Impairment Vector sub-TLV(s) |
: : :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Additional Link Set pairs and Impairment Vector(s) |
: : :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Connectivity | MatrixID | Reserved |1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Impairment Vector sub-TLV(s) |
: : :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Where:
Martinelli, et al. Expires January 14, 2014 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Encoding WSON Info Model with Impairments July 2013
Connectivity: value MUST be 2 for the impairment matrix (Values 0
and 1 are already defined by
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode].
MatrixID: matrix identifier, the scope of this integer number is
shared with [I-D.ietf-ccamp-rwa-info].
N: Node scope flag. With this flag set there's no Link Set
information but only a list of optical parameters TLVs that apply
to the whole optical node.
The usage of multiple matrixes with connectivity type equal to 2
(Impairment Matrix) MIGHT be used to grup optical parameters by
connectivity. For example, if a subset of parameters apply to the
whole node, a unique matrix with flag N=1 is used. At the same some
another subset of parameters applies only to some LinkSet pairs, a
specific Impairment Matrix will be added.
3. Acknowledgements
TBD
4. Contributing Authors
This document was the collective work of several authors. The text
and content of this document was contributed by the editors and the
co-authors listed below (the contact information for the editors
appears in appropriate section and is not repeated below):
Moustafa Kattan
Cisco
DUBAI, 500321
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
Email: mkattan@cisco.com
Young Lee
Huawei
1700 Alma Drive, Suite 100
Plano, TX 75075
USA
Phone: +1 972 509 5599 x2240
Fax: +1 469 229 5397
Email: ylee@huawei.com
Martinelli, et al. Expires January 14, 2014 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Encoding WSON Info Model with Impairments July 2013
Fatai Zhang
Huawei
F3-5-B R&D Center, Huawei Base
Bantian, Longgang District
P.R. China
Phone: +86-755-28972912
Email: zhangfatai@huawei.com
5. IANA Considerations
This document does not contain any IANA request.
6. Security Considerations
This document defines an protocol-neutral encoding for an information
model describing impairments in optical networks and it does not
introduce any security issues. If such a encoding is put into use
within a network it will by its nature contain details of the
physical characteristics of an optical network. Such information
would need to be protected from intentional or unintentional
disclosure.
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[ITU.G680]
International Telecommunications Union, "Physical transfer
functions of optical network elements ", ITU-T
Recommendation G.680, July 2007.
[ITU.G697]
International Telecommunications Union, "Optical
monitoring for dense wavelength division multiplexing
systems ", ITU-T Recommendation G.697, February 2012.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
7.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode]
Martinelli, et al. Expires January 14, 2014 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Encoding WSON Info Model with Impairments July 2013
Bernstein, G., Lee, Y., Li, D., and W. Imajuku, "General
Network Element Constraint Encoding for GMPLS Controlled
Networks", draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode-11
(work in progress), May 2013.
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-rwa-info]
Lee, Y., Bernstein, G., Li, D., and W. Imajuku, "Routing
and Wavelength Assignment Information Model for Wavelength
Switched Optical Networks", draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info-18
(work in progress), May 2013.
[I-D.martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info]
Martinelli, G., Kattan, M., Galimberti, G., and A.
Zanardi, "Information Model for Wavelength Switched
Optical Networks (WSON) with Optical Impairments
Validation.", draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info-01 (work
in progress), February 2013.
[I-D.narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis]
Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", draft-narten-iana-
considerations-rfc2434bis-09 (work in progress), March
2008.
[RFC3552] Rescorla, E. and B. Korver, "Guidelines for Writing RFC
Text on Security Considerations", BCP 72, RFC 3552, July
2003.
[RFC6566] Lee, Y., Bernstein, G., Li, D., and G. Martinelli, "A
Framework for the Control of Wavelength Switched Optical
Networks (WSONs) with Impairments", RFC 6566, March 2012.
Authors' Addresses
Giovanni Martinelli (editor)
Cisco
via Philips 12
Monza 20900
Italy
Phone: +39 039 2092044
Email: giomarti@cisco.com
Martinelli, et al. Expires January 14, 2014 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Encoding WSON Info Model with Impairments July 2013
Andrea Zanardi (editor)
CREATE-NET
via alla Cascata 56 C, Povo
Trento 38100
Italy
Email: andrea.zanardi@create-net.org
Xian Zhang (editor)
Huawei Technologies
F3-5-B R&D Center, Huawei Base
Bantian, Longgang District
Shenzen 518129
P.R. China
Phone: +86 755 28972913
Email: zhang.xian@huawei.com
Gabriele M. Galimberti
Cisco
Via Philips,12
Monza 20900
Italy
Phone: +39 039 2091462
Email: ggalimbe@cisco.com
Domenico Siracusa
CREATE-NET
via alla Cascata 56 C, Povo
Trento 38100
Italy
Email: domenico.siracusa@create-net.org
Martinelli, et al. Expires January 14, 2014 [Page 9]