CCAMP G. Martinelli, Ed.
Internet-Draft Cisco
Intended status: Informational X. Zhang, Ed.
Expires: August 16, 2014 Huawei Technologies
G. Galimberti
Cisco
A. Zanardi
D. Siracusa
CREATE-NET
February 12, 2014
Information Model for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSONs) with
Impairments Validation
draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info-03
Abstract
This document defines an information model to support Impairment-
Aware (IA) Routing and Wavelength Assignment (RWA) function. This
operation might be required in Wavelength Switched Optical Networks
(WSON) that already support RWA and the information model defined
here goes in addition and it is fully compatible with the already
defined information model for impairment-free RWA process in WSON.
This information model shall support all control plane architectural
options defined for WSON with impairment validation.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 16, 2014.
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Definitions, Applicability and Properties . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2. Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.3. Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. ITU-T List of Optical Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Background from WSON-RWA Information Model . . . . . . . . . 7
5. Optical Impairment Information Model . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5.1. The Optical Impairment Vector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.2. Node Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.2.1. Impairment Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5.2.2. Impariment Resource Block Information . . . . . . . . 12
5.3. Link Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
5.4. Path Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
6. Encoding Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
7. Control Plane Architectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
7.1. IV-Centralized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
7.2. IV-Distributed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
9. Contributing Authors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Appendix A. ITU-T Liason Tracking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
1. Introduction
In the context of Wavelength Switched Optical Network (WSON),
[RFC6163] describes the basic framework for a GMPLS and PCE-based
Routing and Wavelength Assignment (RWA) control plane. The
associated information model [I-D.ietf-ccamp-rwa-info] defines all
information/parameters required by an RWA process.
There are cases of WSON where optical impairments plays a significant
role and are considered as important constraints. The framework
document [RFC6566] defines problem scope and related control plane
architectural options for the Impairment Aware Routing and Wavelength
Assignment (IA-RWA) operation. Options include different
combinations of Impairment Validation (IV) and RWA functions in term
of different combination of control plane functions (i.e., PCE,
Routing, Signaling).
This document provides an information model for the impairment aware
case to allow the impairment validation function implemented in the
control plane or enabled by control plane available information.
This model goes in addition to [I-D.ietf-ccamp-rwa-info] and it shall
support any control plane architectural option described by the
framework document (see sections 4.2 and 4.3 of [RFC6566]) where a
set of control plane combinations of control plane functions vs. IV
function is provided.
2. Definitions, Applicability and Properties
This section provides some concepts to help understand concepts used
along the document and to make a clear sepration about what coming
from data plane definitions (ITU-T G recomandations) and are taken as
input for this Information Model. The first sub-section provides raw
definitions while the Applicability sections reuses the defined
concepts to scope this document.
2.1. Definitions
o Computational Model / Optical Computational Model.
Defined by ITU standard documents. In this context we looks for
models that are able to compute optical impairments for a give
lightpath.
o Information Model.
It is defined by IETF (this draft) and provide the set of
information required by the Computational Model to be applied.
o Level of Approximation.
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
This concept refer to the Computational Model as it may compute
optical impairment with a certain level of uncertainty. This
level is generally not measured but [RFC6566] make a rough
classification about it.
o Feasible Path.
It is the output of the CSPF with RWA-IV capability. It's a path
that satisfies the constraints in particular the optical
impairment contraints. The path, instantiated through wavelength,
may actually work or not work depending of the level of
approximation.
o Existing Service Disruption.
A known effect to optical network designers is the cross-
interaction among adjacent (specrum) wavelengths, e,g,,a
wavelength may exeperience some increased BER due to the setting
up of an adjacent wavelength. Solving this problem is a typical
optical network design activity. Just as an example a simple
method is adding optical margings (e.g., additional OSNR), other
complex and detailed methods exist.
2.2. Applicability
This document targets at Scenario C defined in [RFC6566] section
4.1.1. as approximate impairment estimation. The Approximate
concept refer to the fact that this Information Model cover
information mainly provided by the [ITU.G680] Computational Model.
Computational models having no approximation, referred as IV-Detailed
in the [RFC6566], currently does not exist in term of ITU-T
recomandation. They generally refer to non-linear optical impairment
and they are usually vendor specific.
The current information model does not speculate about mathematical
formula used to fill up information model parameters hence, it does
not preclude changing the computational model. At the same time
authors does not belive this Information Model is exhaustive and if
necessary further documents will cover additional models as long as
they become available.
The result of RWA-IV process implementing this Information Model will
result in a path (a wavelength in the data plane) that have better
chance to be feasible than if it was computed without any IV
function. The Existing Service Disruption, as per the definition
above, would still be a problem left to network designers: this model
does not replace by any means the optical network design phase. The
Information Model targets, the GMPLS context with the releated
relationship between data plane(s) and control plane.
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
2.3. Properties
An information model may have several attributes or properties that
need to be defined for each optical parameter made available to the
control plane. The properties will help to determine how the control
plane can deal with a specific impairment parameter, depending on
architectural options chosen within the overall impairment framework
[RFC6566]. In some case, properties value will help to identify the
level of approximation supported by the IV process.
o Time Dependency
This identifies how an impairment parameter may vary with time.
There could be cases where there is no time dependency, while in
other cases there may be need of re-evaluation after a certain
time. In this category, variations in impairments due to
environmental factors such as those discussed in [G.sup47] are
considered. In some cases, an impairment parameter that has time
dependency may be considered as a constant for approximation. In
this information model, we do neglect this property.
o Wavelength Dependency
This property identifies if an impairment parameter can be
considered as constant over all the wavelength spectrum of
interest or not. Also in this case a detailed impairment
evaluation might lead to consider the exact value while an
approximation IV might take a constant value for all wavelengths.
In this information model, we consider both case: dependency / no
dependency on a specific wavelength. This property appears
directly in the information model definitions and related
encoding.
o Linearity
As impairments are representation of physical effects, there are
some that have a linear behavior while other are non-linear.
Linear approximation is in scope of Scenario C of [RFC6566].
During the impairment validation process, this property implies
that the optical effect (or quantity) satisfies the superposition
principle, thus a final result can be calculated by the sum of
each component. The linearity implies the additivity of optical
quantities considered during an impairment validation process.
The non-linear effects in general does not satisfy this property.
The information model presented in this document however, easily
allow introduction of non-linear optical effects with a linear
approximated contribution to the linear ones.
o Multi-Channel
There are cases where a channel's impairments take different
values depending on the aside wavelengths already in place, this
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
is mostly due to non-linear impairments. The result would be a
dependency among different LSPs sharing the same path. This
information model do not cosider this kind of property.
The following table summarize the above considerations where in the
first column reports the list of properties to be considered for each
optical parameter, while the second column states if this property is
taken into account or not by this information model.
+-----------------------+----------------------+
| Property | Info Model Awareness |
+-----------------------+----------------------+
| Time Dependency | no |
| Wavelength Dependency | yes |
| Linearity | yes |
| Multi-channel | no |
+-----------------------+----------------------+
Table 1: Optical Impairment Properties
3. ITU-T List of Optical Parameters
[EDITOR NOTE: To better integrate material coming from ITU WD06-31
October 2013 and future liasons]
As stated by Section 2.2 this Information Model does not intend to be
exaustive and targets an approximate computational model although not
precluding future evolutions towards more detailed impairments
estimation methods.
On the same line, ITU SG15/Q6 provides a list of optitical parameters
with following observations:
(a) the problem of calculating the non-linear impairments in a
multi-vendor environment is not solved. The transfer functions
works only for the so called [ITU.G680] "Situation 1".
(b) The generated list of parameters is not definitive or exaustive.
In particular, [ITU.G680] contains many parameters that would be
required to estimate linear impairments and [ITU.G697] contains
information on which parameters can be monitored in an optical
network.
[ITU.G671] contains some additional parameters defintions required by
here above recomandation.
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
The list of optical parameters starts from [ITU.G680] Section 9 which
provides the optical computational models for the following:
P1 OSNR. Section 9.1
P2 Optical Power. As per Section 9.1, required by Optical
Computation Model for OSNR calculation.
P3 Chromatic Dispersion (CD). Section 9.2
P4 Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD). Section 9.3
P5 Polarization Dependent Loss (PDL). Section 9.3
In addition to the above, the following list of parameters has been
mentioned by ITU SG15/Q6.
P6 Channel Frequency Range [ITU.G671].
P7 Ripple
P8 Channel Signal-Spontaneous noise figure. This is considered
within OSNR computational model above.
P9 Differential Group Delay [ITU.G671]. Required for PMD above.
P10 Reflectance.
P11 Isolation.
P12 Channel extintion.
P13 Non-Linear Coefficient (for a fibre segment). Needed for non-
linear impairment
4. Background from WSON-RWA Information Model
In this section we report terms already defined for the WSON-RWA
(impairment free) as in [I-D.ietf-ccamp-rwa-info] and
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode]. The purpose is to
provide essential information that will be reused or extended for the
impairment case.
In particular [I-D.ietf-ccamp-rwa-info] defines the connectivity
matrix as the following:
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
ConnectivityMatrix ::= <MatrixID> <ConnType> <Matrix>
According to [I-D.ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode], this
definition is further detailed as:
ConnectivityMatrix ::=
<MatrixID> <ConnType> ((<LinkSet> <LinkSet>) ...)
This second formula highlights how the connectivity matrix is built
by pairs of LinkSet objects identifying the internal connectivity
capability due to internal optical node constraint(s). It's
essentially binary information and tell if a wavelength or a set of
wavelengths can go from an input port to an output port.
As an additional note, connectivity matrix belongs to node
information and is purely static. Dynamic information related to the
actual usage of the connections is available through specific
extension to link information.
Furthermore [I-D.ietf-ccamp-rwa-info] define the resource block as
follow:
ResourceBlockInfo ::= <ResourceBlockSet> [<InputConstraints>]
[<ProcessingCapabilities>] [<OutputConstraints>]
Which is an efficient way to model constrains of a WSON node.
5. Optical Impairment Information Model
The idea behind this information model is to categorize the
impairment parameters into three types and extend the information
model already defined for impairment-free WSONs. The three
categories are:
o Node Information. The concept of connectivity matrix is reused
and extended to introduce an impairment matrix, which represents
the impairments suffered on the internal path between two ports.
In addition, the concept of Resource Block is also reused and
extended to provide an efficient modelization of per-port
impairment.
o Link Information representing impairment information related to a
specific link or hop.
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
o Path Information representing the impairment information related
to the whole path.
All the above three categories will make use of a generic container,
the Impairment Vector, to transport optical impairment information.
This information model however will allow however to add additional
parameters beyond the one defined by [ITU.G680] in order to support
additional computational models. This mechanism could eventually
applicable to both linear and non-linear parameters.
This information model makes the assumption that the each optical
node in the network is able to provide the control plane protocols
with its own parameter values however, no assumption is made on how
the optical node gets those value information (e.g. internally
computed, provisioned by a network management system, etc.). To this
extent, the information model intentionally ignores all internal
detailed parameters that are used by the formulas of the Optical
Computational Model (i.e., "transfer function") and simply provides
the object containers to carry results of the formulas.
5.1. The Optical Impairment Vector
Optical Impairment Vector (OIV) is defined as a list of optical
parameters to be associated to a WSON node or a WSON link. It is
defined as:
<OIV> ::= ([<LabelSet>] <OPTICAL_PARAM>) ...
The optional LabelSet object enables wavelength dependency property
as per Table 1. LabelSet has its definition in
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode].
OPTICAL_PARAM. This object represents an optical parameter. The
Impairment vector can contain a set of parameters as identified by
[ITU.G697] since those parameters match the terms of the linear
impairments computational models provided by [ITU.G680]. This
information model does not speculate about the set of parameters
(since defined elsewhere, e.g. ITU-T), however it does not preclude
extentions by adding new parameters.
5.2. Node Information
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
5.2.1. Impairment Matrix
Impairment matrix describes a list of the optical parameters that
applies to a network element as a whole or ingress/egress port pairs
of a network element. Wavelength dependency property of optical
paramters is also considered.
ImpairmentMatrix ::= <MatrixID> <ConnType>
((<LinkSet> <LinkSet> <OIV>) ...)
Where:
MatrixID. This ID is a unique identifier for the matrix. It
shall be unique in scope among connectivity matrices defined in
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-rwa-info] and impairment matrices defined here.
ConnType. This number identifies the type of matrix and it shall
be unique in scope with other values defined by impairment-free
WSON documents.
LinkSet. Same object definition and usage as
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode]. The pairs of LinkSet
identify one or more internal node constrain.
OIV. The Optical Impairment Vector defined above.
The model can be represented as a multidimensional matrix shown in
the following picture
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
_________________________________________
/ / / / / /|
/ / / / / / |
/________/_______/_______/_______/_______/ |
/ / / / / /| /|
/ / / / / / | |
/________/_______/_______/_______/_______/ | /|
/ / / / / /| /| |
/ / / / / / | | /|
/________/_______/_______/_______/_______/ | /| |
/ / / / / /| /| | /|
/ / / / / / | | /| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | /| | / PDL
<LinkSet#1> | - | | | | | /| | /|/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | /| /
<linkSet#2> | | - | | | | /| | / PND
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | /|/
<linkSet#3> | | | - | | | /| /
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | / Chr.Disp.
<linkSet#4> | | | | - | | /|/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ /
<linkSet#5> | | | | | - | / OSNR
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
<LS#1> <LS#2> <LS#3> <LS#4> <LS#5>
The connectivity matrix from
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode] is only a two dimensional
matrix, containing only binary information, through the LinkSet
pairs. In this model, a third dimension is added by generalizing the
binary information through the Optical Impairment Vector associated
with each LinkSet pair. Optical parameters in the picture are
reported just as examples while details go into specific encoding
draft [I-D.martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode].
This representation shows the most general case however, the total
amount of information transported by control plane protocols can be
greatly reduced by proper encoding when the same set of values apply
to all LinkSet pairs.
[EDITOR NODE: first run of the information model does looks for
generality not for optimizing the quantity of information. We'll
deal with optimization in a further step.]
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
5.2.2. Impariment Resource Block Information
This information model reuse the definition of Resource Block
Information adding the associated impairment vector.
ResourceBlockInfo ::= <ResourceBlockSet> [<InputConstraints>]
[<ProcessingCapabilities>] [<OutputConstraints>] [<OIV>]
The object ResourceBlockInfo is than used as specified within
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-rwa-info].
5.3. Link Information
For the list of optical parameters associated to the link, the same
approach used for the node-specific impairment information can be
applied. The link-specific impairment information is extended from
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-rwa-info] as the following:
<DynamicLinkInfo> ::= <LinkID> <AvailableLabels>
[<SharedBackupLabels>] [<OIV>]
DynamicLinkInfo is already defined in [I-D.ietf-ccamp-rwa-info] while
OIV is the Optical Impairment Vector is defined in the previous
section.
5.4. Path Information
There are cases where the optical impariments can only be described
as a contrains on the overall end to end path. In such case, the
optical impariment and/or parameter, cannot be derived (using a
simple function) from the set of node / link contributions.
An equivalent case is the option reported by [RFC6566] on IV-
Candidate paths where, the control plane knows a list of optically
feasible paths so a new path setup can be selected among that list.
Independent from the protocols and functions combination (i.e. RWA
vs. Routing vs. PCE), the IV-Candidates imply a path property stating
that a path is optically feasible.
<PathInfo> ::= <OIV>
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
[EDITOR NOTE: section to be completed, especially to evaluate
protocol implications. Likely resemble to RSVP ADSPEC].
6. Encoding Considerations
Details about encoding will be defined in a separate document
[I-D.martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode] however worth remembering that,
within [ITU.G697] Appending V, ITU already provides a guideline for
encoding some optical parameters.
In particular [ITU.G697] indicates that each parameter shall be
represented by a 32 bit floating point number.
Values for optical parameters are provided by optical node and it
could provide by direct measurement or from some internal computation
starting from indirect measurement. In such cases could be useful to
un understand the variance associated with the value of the optical
parmater hence, the encoding shall provide the possibility to include
a variance as well.
This kind of information will enable IA-RWA process to make some
additional considerations on wavelength feasibility. [RFC6566]
Section 4.1.3 reports some considerations regarding this degree of
confidence during the impairment validation process.
7. Control Plane Architectures
This section briefly describes how the defintions contained in this
information model will match the architectural options described by
[RFC6566].
The first assumption is that the WSON GMPLS extentions are available
and operational. To such extent, the WSON-RWA will provide the
following information through its path computation (and RWA process):
o The wavelengths connectivity, considering also the connectivity
constraints limited by reconfigurable optics, and wavelengths
availability.
o The interface compatibility at the physical level.
o The Optical-Elettro-Optical (OEO) availability within the network
(and related physical interface compatibility). As already stated
by the framework this information it's very important for
impairment validation:
A. If the IV functions fail (path optically infeasible), the path
computation function may use an available OEO point to find a
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
feasible path. In normally operated networks OEO are mainly
uses to support optically unfeasible path than mere wavelength
conversion.
B. The OEO points reset the optical impairment information since
a new light is generated.
7.1. IV-Centralized
Centralized IV process is performed by a single entity (e.g., a PCE).
Given sufficient impairment information, it can either be used to
provide a list of paths between two nodes, which are valid in terms
of optical impairments. Alternatively, it can help validate whether
a particular selected path and wavelength is feasiable or not. This
requires distribution of impairment information to the entity
performing the IV process.
[EDITOR NOTE: to be completed]
7.2. IV-Distributed
For the distributed IV process, common computational models are
needed together with the information model defined in this document.
Computational models for the optical impairments are defined by ITU
standard body. The currently available computation models are
reported in [ITU.G680] and only cover the linear impairment case.
This does not require the distribution of impairment information
since they can be collected hop-by-hop using a control plane
signaling protocol.
[EDITOR NOTE: to be completed]
8. Acknowledgements
Authors would like to thank ITU SG15/Q6 and in particular Pete Anslow
for providing text and information to CCAMP through join meetings and
liasons.
9. Contributing Authors
This document was the collective work of several authors. The text
and content of this document was contributed by the editors and the
co-authors listed below (the contact information for the editors
appears in appropriate section and is not repeated below):
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
Moustafa Kattan
Cisco
DUBAI, 500321
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
Email: mkattan@cisco.com
Young Lee
Huawei
1700 Alma Drive, Suite 100
Plano, TX 75075
USA
Phone: +1 972 509 5599 x2240
Fax: +1 469 229 5397
Email: ylee@huawei.com
Greg M. Bernstein
Grotto Networking
Fremont, CA
USA
Phone: +1 510 573 2237
Email: gregb@grotto-networking.com
Fatai Zhang
Huawei
F3-5-B R&D Center, Huawei Base
Bantian, Longgang District
P.R. China
Phone: +86-755-28972912
Email: zhangfatai@huawei.com
Federico Pederzolli
CREATE-NET
via alla Cascata 56/D, Povo
Trento 38123
Italy
Email: federico.pederzolli@create-net.org
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
10. IANA Considerations
This document does not contain any IANA requirement.
11. Security Considerations
This document defines an information model for impairments in optical
networks. If such a model is put into use within a network it will
by its nature contain details of the physical characteristics of an
optical network. Such information would need to be protected from
intentional or unintentional disclosure.
12. References
12.1. Normative References
[ITU.G671]
International Telecommunications Union, "Transmission
characteristics of optical components and subsystems",
ITU-T Recommendation G.671, February 2012.
[ITU.G680]
International Telecommunications Union, "Physical transfer
functions of optical network elements", ITU-T
Recommendation G.680, July 2007.
[ITU.G697]
International Telecommunications Union, "Optical
monitoring for dense wavelength division multiplexing
systems", ITU-T Recommendation G.697, February 2012.
12.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode]
Bernstein, G., Lee, Y., Li, D., and W. Imajuku, "General
Network Element Constraint Encoding for GMPLS Controlled
Networks", draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode-13
(work in progress), November 2013.
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-rwa-info]
Lee, Y., Bernstein, G., Li, D., and W. Imajuku, "Routing
and Wavelength Assignment Information Model for Wavelength
Switched Optical Networks", draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info-19
(work in progress), November 2013.
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
[I-D.martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode]
Martinelli, G., Zanardi, A., Zhang, X., Galimberti, G.,
and D. Siracusa, "Information Encoding for WSON with
Impairments Validation", draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-
encode-02 (work in progress), July 2013.
[RFC6163] Lee, Y., Bernstein, G., and W. Imajuku, "Framework for
GMPLS and Path Computation Element (PCE) Control of
Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSONs)", RFC 6163,
April 2011.
[RFC6566] Lee, Y., Bernstein, G., Li, D., and G. Martinelli, "A
Framework for the Control of Wavelength Switched Optical
Networks (WSONs) with Impairments", RFC 6566, March 2012.
Appendix A. ITU-T Liason Tracking
[EDITOR NOTE: appendix reserved to track liason to/from ITU related
to this draft]
Authors' Addresses
Giovanni Martinelli (editor)
Cisco
via Philips 12
Monza 20900
Italy
Phone: +39 039 2092044
Email: giomarti@cisco.com
Xian Zhang (editor)
Huawei Technologies
F3-5-B R&D Center, Huawei Base
Bantian, Longgang District
Shenzen 518129
P.R. China
Phone: +86 755 28972465
Email: zhang.xian@huawei.com
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft WSON Impairments Information Model February 2014
Gabriele M. Galimberti
Cisco
Via Philips,12
Monza 20900
Italy
Phone: +39 039 2091462
Email: ggalimbe@cisco.com
Andrea Zanardi
CREATE-NET
via alla Cascata 56/D, Povo
Trento 38123
Italy
Email: andrea.zanardi@create-net.org
Domenico Siracusa
CREATE-NET
via alla Cascata 56/D, Povo
Trento 38123
Italy
Email: domenico.siracusa@create-net.org
Martinelli, et al. Expires August 16, 2014 [Page 18]