Network Working Group J. Pechanec
Internet-Draft D. J. Moffat
Intended status: Standards Track Oracle Corporation
Expires: November 16, 2013 May 15, 2013
The PKCS#11 URI Scheme
draft-pechanec-pkcs11uri-10
Abstract
This memo specifies a PKCS#11 Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)
Scheme for identifying PKCS#11 objects stored in PKCS#11 tokens, for
identifying PKCS#11 tokens themselves, or for identifying PKCS#11
libraries. The URI is based on how PKCS#11 objects, tokens, and
libraries are identified in the PKCS#11 Cryptographic Token Interface
Standard.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on November 16, 2013.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Pechanec & Moffat Expires November 16, 2013 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft The PKCS#11 URI Scheme May 2013
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. PKCS#11 URI Scheme Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. PKCS#11 URI Scheme Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2. PKCS#11 URI Scheme Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.3. PKCS#11 URI Scheme Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.4. PKCS#11 URI Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Examples of PKCS#11 URIs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1. Introduction
The PKCS #11: Cryptographic Token Interface Standard [pkcs11_spec]
specifies an API, called Cryptoki, for devices which hold
cryptographic information and perform cryptographic functions.
Cryptoki, pronounced crypto-key and short for cryptographic token
interface, follows a simple object-based approach, addressing the
goals of technology independence (any kind of device may be used) and
resource sharing (multiple applications may access multiple devices),
presenting applications with a common, logical view of the device - a
cryptographic token.
It is desirable for applications or libraries that work with PKCS#11
tokens to accept a common identifier that consumers could use to
identify an existing PKCS#11 object in a PKCS#11 token, an existing
token itself, or an existing Cryptoki library. The set of object
types that can be stored in a PKCS#11 token includes a public key, a
private key, a certificate, a secret key, and a data object. These
objects can be uniquely identifiable via the PKCS#11 URI scheme
defined in this document. The set of attributes describing an object
can contain an object label, its type, and its ID. The set of
Pechanec & Moffat Expires November 16, 2013 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft The PKCS#11 URI Scheme May 2013
attributes that identifies a PKCS#11 token can contain a token label,
a manufacturer name, a serial number, and a token model. Attributes
that can identify a Cryptoki library are a library manufacturer, a
library description, and a library version. Library attributes may
be necessary to use if more than one PKCS#11 module provides a token
and/or PKCS#11 objects of the same name(s).
A subset of existing PKCS#11 structure members and object attributes
was chosen believed to be sufficient in uniquely identifying a
PKCS#11 token, object, or library in a configuration file, on a
command line, or in a configuration property of something else.
Should there be a need for a more complex information exchange on
PKCS#11 entities a different means of data marshalling should be
chosen accordingly.
A PKCS#11 URI is not intended to be used to create new PKCS#11
objects in tokens, or to create PKCS#11 tokens. It is solely to be
used to identify and work with existing objects, tokens, and Cryptoki
libraries through the PKCS#11 API.
The URI scheme defined in this document is designed specifically with
a mapping to the PKCS#11 API in mind. The URI uses only the scheme
and the path components which are required by the Uniform Resource
Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax [RFC3986]. The URI scheme does not
use the hierarchical element for a naming authority in the path since
the authority part could not be mapped to PKCS#11 API elements. The
URI scheme does not use the optional query and fragment elements.
If an application has no access to a producer or producers of the
PKCS#11 API it is left to its implementation to provide adequate user
interface to locate and load such producer(s).
2. Contributors
Stef Walter, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, Nico Williams, Dan Winship, and
Jaroslav Imrich contributed to the development of this document.
3. PKCS#11 URI Scheme Definition
In accordance with [RFC4395], this section provides the information
required to register the PKCS#11 URI scheme.
3.1. PKCS#11 URI Scheme Name
pkcs11
3.2. PKCS#11 URI Scheme Status
Pechanec & Moffat Expires November 16, 2013 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft The PKCS#11 URI Scheme May 2013
Permanent.
3.3. PKCS#11 URI Scheme Syntax
The PKCS#11 URI scheme is a sequence of attribute value pairs
separated by a semicolon. In accordance with Section 2.5 of
[RFC3986], the data should first be encoded as octets according to
the UTF-8 character encoding [RFC3629]; then only those octets that
do not correspond to characters in the unreserved set or to permitted
characters from the reserved set should be percent-encoded. This
specification suggests one allowable exception to that rule for the
"id" attribute, as stated later in this section. Grammar rules
"unreserved" and "pct-encoded" in the PKCS#11 URI specification below
are imported from [RFC3986]. As a special case, note that according
to Appendix A of [RFC3986], a space must be percent-encoded.
PKCS#11 specification imposes various limitations on the value of
attributes, be it a more restrictive character set for the "serial"
attribute or fixed sized buffers for almost all the others, including
"token", "manufacturer", and "model" attributes. However, the
PKCS#11 URI notation does not impose such limitations aside from
removing generic and PKCS#11 URI delimiters from a permitted
character set. We believe that being too restrictive on the
attribute values could limit the PKCS#11 URI's usefulness. What is
more, possible future changes to the PKCS#11 specification should not
affect existing attributes.
A PKCS#11 URI takes the form (for explanation of Augmented BNF, see
[RFC5234]):
Pechanec & Moffat Expires November 16, 2013 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft The PKCS#11 URI Scheme May 2013
pk11-URI = "pkcs11" ":" pk11-identifier
pk11-identifier = *1(pk11-attr *(";" pk11-attr))
pk11-attr = pk11-token / pk11-manuf / pk11-serial /
pk11-model / pk11-lib-manuf /
pk11-lib-ver / pk11-lib-desc /
pk11-object / pk11-object-type / pk11-id /
pk11-pin-source
; Section 2.2 of RFC 3986 specifies that all potentially reserved
; characters that do not conflict with actual delimiters of the URI
; do not have to be percent-encoded. So, ";" was removed as a
; sub-delimiter of the PKCS#11 URI's path and "/", "?", and "#" as
; delimiters of generic URI components.
pk11-reserved-avail = ":" / "[" / "]" / "@" / "!" / "$" /
"&" / "'" / "(" / ")" / "*" / "+" /
"," / "="
pk11-char = unreserved / pk11-reserved-avail /
pct-encoded
pk11-token = "token" "=" *pk11-char
pk11-manuf = "manufacturer" "=" *pk11-char
pk11-serial = "serial" "=" *pk11-char
pk11-model = "model" "=" *pk11-char
pk11-lib-manuf = "library-manufacturer" "=" *pk11-char
pk11-lib-desc = "library-description" "=" *pk11-char
pk11-lib-ver = "library-version" "=" 1*DIGIT *1("." 1*DIGIT)
pk11-object = "object" "=" *pk11-char
pk11-object-type = "object-type" "=" *1("public" / "private" /
"cert" / "secret-key" / "data")
pk11-id = "id" "=" *pk11-char
pk11-pin-source = "pin-source" "=" *pk11-char
More specifically, '/' delimiter of generic URI components was
removed from available characters that do not have to be percent-
encoded so that the initial part of a PKCS#11 URI is never confused
with "path-rootless" part of the "hier-part" generic URI component as
defined in Section 3 of [RFC3986]. Delimiters '?' and '#' of
generic URI components were removed to allow for possible future
extensions of the PKCS#11 URI. All other delimiters of generic URI
components are allowed to be used unencoded (':', '[', ']', and '@')
in the PKCS#11 URI.
The attribute "token" represents a token label and corresponds to the
"label" member of the CK_TOKEN_INFO structure, the attribute
"manufacturer" corresponds to the "manufacturerID" member of
CK_TOKEN_INFO, the attribute "serial" corresponds to the
"serialNumber" member of CK_TOKEN_INFO, the attribute "model"
corresponds to the "model" member of CK_TOKEN_INFO, the attribute
"library-manufacturer" represents the Cryptoki library manufacturer
Pechanec & Moffat Expires November 16, 2013 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft The PKCS#11 URI Scheme May 2013
and corresponds to the "manufacturerID" member of the CK_INFO
structure, the attribute "library-description" corresponds to the
"libraryDescription" member of CK_INFO, the attribute "library-
version" corresponds to the "libraryVersion" member of CK_INFO, the
attribute "object" represents a PKCS#11 object label and corresponds
to the "CKA_LABEL" object attribute, the attribute "object-type"
represents the type of the object and corresponds to the "CKA_CLASS"
object attribute, the attribute "id" represents the object ID and
corresponds to the "CKA_ID" object attribute, and the attribute "pin-
source" specifies where the application or library should find the
token PIN, if needed.
The PKCS#11 URI must not contain duplicate attributes of the same
name. It means that each attribute may be present at most once in a
PKCS#11 URI string.
The "pin-source" attribute may represent a filename that contains a
token PIN but an application may overload this attribute. For
example, "pin-source=%7Cprog-name" could mean to read a PIN from an
external application (%7C denotes a pipe '|' character). Note that
an application may always ask for a PIN and/or interpret the "pin-
source" attribute by any means it decides to. However, as discussed
in Section 6, the attribute should never contain the PIN itself.
It is recommended to percent-encode the whole value of the "id"
attribute which is supposed to be handled as arbitrary binary data.
Value "M" of the "library-version" attribute should be interpreted as
"M" for the major and "0" for the minor version of the library. Note
that if the "library-version" attribute is present, the major version
number is mandatory.
An empty PKCS#11 URI attribute that does allow for an empty value
matches a corresponding structure member or an object attribute with
an empty value. Note that according to the PKCS#11 specification
[pkcs11_spec], empty character values in a PKCS#11 producer must be
padded with spaces and should not be NULL terminated.
3.4. PKCS#11 URI Comparison
Comparison of two URIs is a way of determining whether the URIs are
equivalent without comparing the actual resource the URIs point to.
The comparison of URIs aims to minimize false negatives while
strictly avoiding false positives.
Two PKCS#11 URIs are said to be equal if URIs as character strings
are identical as specified in Section 6.2.1 of [RFC3986], or if both
following rules are fulfilled:
Pechanec & Moffat Expires November 16, 2013 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft The PKCS#11 URI Scheme May 2013
o set of attributes present in the URI is equal. Note that the
ordering of attributes in the URI string is not significant for
the mechanism of comparison.
o values of respective attributes are equal based on rules specified
below
The rules for comparing values of respective attributes are:
o values of attributes "library-description", "library-
manufacturer", "manufacturer", "model", "object", "object-type",
"serial", and "token" must be compared using a simple string
comparison as specified in Section 6.2.1 of [RFC3986] after the
case and the percent-encoding normalization are both applied as
specified in Section 6.2.2 of [RFC3986]
o value of attribute "id" must be compared using the simple string
comparison after all bytes are percent-encoded using uppercase
letters for digits A-F
o value for attribute "pin-source", if deemed containing the
filename with the PIN value, must be compared using the simple
string comparison after the full syntax based normalization as
specified in Section 6.2.2 of [RFC3986] is applied. If value of
the "pin-source" attribute is believed to be overloaded it is
recommended to perform case and percent-encoding normalization
before the values are compared but the exact mechanism of
comparison is left to the application.
o value of attribute "library-version" must be processed as a
specific scheme-based normalization permitted by Section 6.2.3 of
[RFC3986]. The value must be split into a major and minor version
with character '.' (dot) serving as a delimiter. Library version
"M" must be treated as "M" for the major version and "0" for the
minor version. Resulting minor and major version numbers must be
then separately compared numerically.
4. Examples of PKCS#11 URIs
This section contains some examples of how PKCS#11 token objects,
PKCS#11 tokens, and PKCS#11 libraries can be identified using the
PKCS#11 URI scheme. Note that in some of the following examples,
newlines and spaces were inserted for better readability. As
specified in Appendix C of [RFC3986], whitespace should be ignored
when extracting the URI. Also note that all spaces as part of the
URI are percent-encoded, as specified in Appendix A of [RFC3986].
Pechanec & Moffat Expires November 16, 2013 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft The PKCS#11 URI Scheme May 2013
An empty PKCS#11 URI might be useful to PKCS#11 consumers:
pkcs11:
One of the simplest and most useful forms might be a PKCS#11 URI that
specifies only an object label and its type. The default token is
used so the URI does not specify it. Note that when specifying
public objects, a token PIN might not be required.
pkcs11:object=my-pubkey;object-type=public
When a private key is specified either the "pin-source" attribute or
an application specific method would be usually used. Also note that
'/' must be percent-encoded in the "pin-source" attribute value since
it must be prevented to be mistaken for a path segment delimiter.
pkcs11:object=my-key;object-type=private;
pin-source=%2Fetc%2Ftoken_pin
The following example identifies a certificate in the software token.
Note an empty value for the attribute "serial". Also note that the
"id" attribute value is entirely percent-encoded, as recommended.
While ',' is in the reserved set it does not have to be percent-
encoded since it does not conflict with any sub-delimiters used. The
'#' character as in "The Software PKCS#11 Softtoken" is a general
delimiter as '/' so it must be percent-encoded, too.
pkcs11:token=The%20Software%20PKCS%2311%20Softtoken;
manufacturer=Snake%20Oil,%20Inc.;
serial=;
model=1.0;
object=my-certificate;
object-type=cert;
id=%69%95%3E%5C%F4%BD%EC%91;
pin-source=%2Fetc%2Ftoken_pin
The token alone can be identified without specifying any PKCS#11
objects. A PIN may still be needed to list all objects, for example.
pkcs11:token=Software%20PKCS%2311%20softtoken;
manufacturer=Snake%20Oil,%20Inc.;
pin-source=%2Fetc%2Ftoken_pin
Pechanec & Moffat Expires November 16, 2013 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft The PKCS#11 URI Scheme May 2013
The Cryptoki library alone can be also identified without specifying
a PKCS#11 token or object.
pkcs11:library-manufacturer=Snake%20Oil,%20Inc.;
library-description=Soft%20Token%20Library;
library-version=1.23
The following example shows that the attribute value can contain a
semicolon. In such case, it is percent-encoded. The token attribute
value must be read as "My token; created by Joe". Lower case letters
can also be used in percent-encoding as shown below in the "id"
attribute value but note that Sections 2.1 and 6.2.2.1 of [RFC3986]
read that all percent-encoded characters should use the uppercase
hexadecimal digits. More specifically, if the URI string was to be
compared, the algorithm defined in Section 3.4 explicitly requires
percent-encoding to use the uppercase digits A-F in the "id"
attribute values. And as explained in Section 3.3, library version
"3" should be interpreted as "3" for the major and "0" for the minor
version of the library.
pkcs11:token=My%20token%25%20created%20by%20Joe;
library-version=3
id=%01%02%03%Ba%dd%Ca%fe%04%05%06;
If there is any need to include literal "%;" substring, for example,
both characters must be escaped. The token value must be read as "A
name with a substring \;".
pkcs11:token=A%20name%20with%20a%20substring%20%25%3B;
object=my-certificate;
object-type=cert;
pin-source=%2Fetc%2Ftoken_pin
The next example includes a small A with acute in the token name. It
must be encoded in octets according to the UTF-8 character encoding
and then percent-encoded. Given that a small A with acute is U+225
unicode code point, the UTF-8 encoding is 195 161 in decimal, and
that is "%C3%A1" in percent-encoding.
pkcs11:token=Name%20with%20a%20small%20A%20with%20acute:%20%C3%A1;
object=my-certificate;
object-type=cert
Pechanec & Moffat Expires November 16, 2013 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft The PKCS#11 URI Scheme May 2013
5. IANA Considerations
This document registers a URI scheme.
6. Security Considerations
There are general security considerations for URI schemes discussed
in Section 7 of [RFC3986].
From those security considerations, Section 7.1 of [RFC3986] applies
since there is no guarantee that the same PKCS#11 URI will always
identify the same object, token, or a library in the future.
Section 7.5 of [RFC3986] applies since the PKCS#11 URI may be used in
command line arguments to run applications, and those arguments can
be world readable on some systems. For that reasons, the URI
intentionally does not allow for specifying the PKCS#11 token PIN as
a URI attribute.
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
10646", RFC 3629, STD 63, November 2003.
[RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. T., and L. Masinter,
"Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC
3986, STD 66, January 2005.
[RFC5234] Crocker, D. H. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", RFC 5234, STD 68, January 2008.
7.2. Informative References
[RFC4395] Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and
Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", RFC 4395,
February 2006.
[pkcs11_spec]
RSA Laboratories, "PKCS #11: Cryptographic Token Interface
Standard v2.20", June 2004.
Pechanec & Moffat Expires November 16, 2013 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft The PKCS#11 URI Scheme May 2013
Authors' Addresses
Jan Pechanec
Oracle Corporation
4180 Network Circle
Santa Clara CA 95054
USA
Email: Jan.Pechanec@Oracle.COM
URI: http://www.oracle.com
Darren J. Moffat
Oracle Corporation
Oracle Parkway
Thames Valley Park
Reading RG6 1RA
UK
Email: Darren.Moffat@Oracle.COM
URI: http://www.oracle.com
Pechanec & Moffat Expires November 16, 2013 [Page 11]