[Search] [txt|xml|pdf|bibtex] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03 04 05 rfc6963                        Informational
Network Working Group                                     P. Saint-Andre
Internet-Draft                                       Cisco Systems, Inc.
Intended status: Best Current Practice                 February 19, 2013
Expires: August 23, 2013


          A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Examples
                    draft-saintandre-urn-example-03

Abstract

   This document defines a Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace
   identifier enabling generation of URNs that are appropriate for use
   in documentation, private testing, and the like.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 23, 2013.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents



Saint-Andre             Expires August 23, 2013                 [Page 1]


Internet-Draft                Example URNs                 February 2013



   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Completed Namespace Definition Template . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Namespace Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   4.  Community Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   Appendix A.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5

1.  Introduction

   The Uniform Resource Name (URN) technology [RFC2141] provides a way
   to generate persistent, location-independent, resource identifiers.
   The primary "scope" of a URN is provided by its namespace identifier
   (NID) [RFC3406].  There are three kinds of NID: formal, informal, and
   experimental.  Most of the NIDs registered to date are formal: as far
   as is known the few informal namespaces have not been widely used,
   and the experimental namespaces are by definition unregistered.

   The experimental namespaces take the form "X-NID" (where "NID" is the
   desired namespace identifier).  Because the "x-" convention has been
   deprecated in general [RFC6648], it seems sensible to achieve the
   same objective in a different way.  Therefore this document registers
   a formal namespace identifier of "example", similar to "example.com"
   and other domain names [RFC2606].  Under the "example" NID,
   specification authors and code developers can mint URNs for use in
   documentation and private testing by assigning their own unique
   namespace-specific strings.

2.  Completed Namespace Definition Template

2.1.  Namespace ID

   The Namespace ID "example" is requested.

2.2.  Registration Information

   Version 1

   Date: [to be assigned]









Saint-Andre             Expires August 23, 2013                 [Page 2]


Internet-Draft                Example URNs                 February 2013


2.3.  Declared Registrant of the Namespace

   Registering organization: IETF

   Designated contact: IESG, iesg@ietf.org

2.4.  Declaration of Syntactic Structure

   The Namespace Specific String (NSS) of all URNs that use the
   "example" NID shall have the following structure:

   urn:example:{NSS}

   The NSS is a mandatory string of ASCII characters [RFC20] that
   conforms to the URN syntax requirements [RFC2141] and that provides a
   name that is useful within the relevant documentation example, test
   suite, or other application.  Any

2.5.  Relevant Ancillary Documentation

   See [RFC6648] for information about deprecation of the "x-"
   convention in protocol parameters and identifiers.

2.6.  Identifier Uniqueness Considerations

   Those who mint example URNs ought to strive for uniqueness in the
   namespace specific string portion of the URN.  However, such
   uniqueness cannot be guaranteed through the assignment process.  As a
   result, implementers are counselled against using example URNs for
   any purposes other than documentation, private testing, and truly
   experimental contexts.

2.7.  Identifier Persistence Considerations

   Once minted, an example URN is immutable.  However, it is simply a
   string and there is no guarantee that the documentation, test suite,
   or other application using the URN is immutable.

2.8.  Process for Identifier Resolution

   Example URNs are not intended to be resolved, and the namespace will
   probably never be registered with a Resolution Discovery System
   (unless to simply inform requesters that such URNs are merely
   examples).

2.9.  Rules for Lexical Equivalence





Saint-Andre             Expires August 23, 2013                 [Page 3]


Internet-Draft                Example URNs                 February 2013


   No special considerations; the rules for lexical equivalence
   specified in [RFC2141] apply.

2.10.  Conformance with URN Syntax

   No special considerations

2.11.  Validation Mechanism

   None

2.12.  Scope

   Global

3.  Namespace Considerations

   No existing formal namespace enables entities to generate URNs that
   are appropriate for use as examples in documentation, in private
   testing, and the like.  It could be argued that no such formal
   namespace is needed, given that experimental namespaces can be minted
   at will.  However, experimental namespaces run afoul of the trend
   away from using the "x-" convention in the names of protocol
   parameters and identifiers [RFC6648].  Additionally, in practice
   specification authors often mint examples using fake NIDs that go
   unregistered because they are never intended to be used; to minimize
   the possibility of confusion, it seems preferable to create a
   dedicated namespace that can be used to generate example URNs.

4.  Community Considerations

   The "example" NID is intended to provide a clean, easily-recognizable
   space for minting examples to be used in documentation, in private
   testing, and the like.  The Namespace Specific String (NSS) needs to
   be a unique string, generated by the person, organization, or other
   entity that creates the documentation, test suite, or other
   application.  There is no issuing authority for example URNs and they
   cannot be resolved in any meaningful way.

   The example NID does not obviate the need to coordinate with issuing
   authorities for existing namespaces (e.g., minting
   "urn:example:xmpp:foo" instead of requesting issuance of
   "urn:xmpp:foo"), to register new namespace identifiers if existing
   namespaces do not match one's desired functionality (e.g., minting
   "urn:example:sha-1:29ead03e784b2f636a23ffff95ed12b56e2f2637" instead
   of registering the "sha-1" NID), or to respect the basic spirit of
   URN NID assignment (e.g., setting up shadow NIDs such as
   "urn:example:MyCompany:*" instead of using, say, HTTP URIs).



Saint-Andre             Expires August 23, 2013                 [Page 4]


Internet-Draft                Example URNs                 February 2013


5.  Security Considerations

   This document introduces no additional security considerations beyond
   those associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general.

6.  IANA Considerations

   This document defines a URN NID registration of "example", to be
   added to the Uniform Resource Names (URN) Formal Namespaces registry.
   The completed registration template can be found in under Section 2.

7.  References

7.1.  Normative References

   [RFC20]    Cerf, V., "ASCII format for network interchange", RFC 20,
              October 1969.

   [RFC2141]  Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997.

   [RFC3406]  Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom,
              "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition
              Mechanisms", BCP 66, RFC 3406, October 2002.

   [RFC6648]  Saint-Andre, P., Crocker, D., and M. Nottingham,
              "Deprecating the "X-" Prefix and Similar Constructs in
              Application Protocols", BCP 178, RFC 6648, June 2012.

7.2.  Informative References

   [RFC2606]  Eastlake, D.E. and A. Panitz, "Reserved Top Level DNS
              Names", BCP 32, RFC 2606, June 1999.

Appendix A.  Acknowledgements

   Thanks to Martin Duerst, Barry Leiba, Julian Reschke, and Jim Schaad
   for their feedback.

Author's Address

   Peter Saint-Andre
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   1899 Wynkoop Street, Suite 600
   Denver, CO  80202
   USA

   Email: psaintan@cisco.com



Saint-Andre             Expires August 23, 2013                 [Page 5]