OAuth Working Group                                             C. Smith
Internet-Draft                                               T. Hardjono
Intended status: Standards Track                                     MIT
Expires: August 10, 2017                                February 6, 2017


                        JSON Web Document (JWD)
                 draft-smith-oauth-json-web-document-00

Abstract

   JSON Web Document (JWD) is a means of representing optionally signed
   and/or encrypted JSON content suitable for storage, retrieval,
   transmission, and display in a graphical user interface.  The content
   of a JWD is used as the payload of a JSON Web Signature (JWS)
   structure or as the plaintext of a JSON Web Encryption (JWE)
   structure.

Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 10, 2017.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents



Smith & Hardjono         Expires August 10, 2017                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft                     JWD                     February 2017


   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  JWS Document Serialization  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  JWS Flattened Document Serialization  . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   7.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     8.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     8.2.  URIs  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Appendix A.  Example Signed JWD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5

1.  Introduction

   JWD introduces a new set of serializations to JWS and JWE called the
   Document Serializations.  These serializations follow the form of the
   JSON Serialization and Flattened JSON Serialization described in JWS
   Section 7.2 [1], except that the payload, integrity-protected header,
   and non-integrity-protected header contents are all represented as
   unencoded JSON values and MUST NOT be base64url-encoded.

   Signatures present in the data structure MUST be base64url-encoded.
   Signatures are computed using base64url-encoded JSON values for the
   payload and integrity-protected headers as in JWS.  For a given
   payload and JOSE Header, the signature(s) of a JWD MUST be identical
   to signatures computed for semantically equivalent JWT
   serializations.

2.  Terminology

   This specification uses terms defined in the JSON Web Token [JWT],
   JSON Web Signature [JWS], and JSON Web Encryption [JWE]
   specifications.

   These terms are defined by this specification:

      JSON Web Document (JWD)



Smith & Hardjono         Expires August 10, 2017                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft                     JWD                     February 2017


         A data structure representing a digitally signed, MACed, or
         encrypted JSON document.

      JWS Document Serialization

         A representation of the JWD as a JSON document.  Unlike the JWS
         JSON Serialization, the JWS Document Serialization represents
         the JWS Payload and integrity-protected JOSE Header parameters
         as unencoded JSON values.  This representation simplifies
         storage and retrieval of signed content with document stores
         and search engines, as well as display in applications.

3.  JWS Document Serialization

   {
     "payload": <payload contents>,
     "signatures": [
       {
         "protected": <integrity-protected header 1 contents>,
         "header": <non-integrity-protected header 1 contents>,
         "signature": "<signature 1 contents>"
       },
       ...
       {
         "protected": <integrity-protected header N contents>,
         "header": <non-integrity-protected header N contents>,
         "signature": "<signature N contents>"
       }
     ]
   }

                                 Figure 1

4.  JWS Flattened Document Serialization

   {
       "payload": <payload contents>,
       "protected": <integrity-protected header contents>,
       "header": <non-integrity-protected header contents>,
       "signature": "<signature contents>"
   }

                                 Figure 2








Smith & Hardjono         Expires August 10, 2017                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft                     JWD                     February 2017


5.  IANA Considerations

   TBD

6.  Security Considerations

   TBD

7.  Acknowledgements

   TBD

8.  References

8.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC7515]  Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, "JSON Web
              Signature (JWS)", RFC 7515, DOI 10.17487/RFC7515, May
              2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7515>.

   [RFC7516]  Jones, M. and J. Hildebrand, "JSON Web Encryption (JWE)",
              RFC 7516, DOI 10.17487/RFC7516, May 2015,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7516>.

   [RFC7519]  Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, "JSON Web Token
              (JWT)", RFC 7519, DOI 10.17487/RFC7519, May 2015,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7519>.

8.2.  URIs

   [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7515#section-7.2

Appendix A.  Example Signed JWD













Smith & Hardjono         Expires August 10, 2017                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft                     JWD                     February 2017


   {
     "protected": {
       "alg": "ES512",
       "jku": "https://example.com/jwks"
     },
     "payload": {
       "a": "Please don't BASE64URL encode me!",
       "b": "I need to be indexed!",
       "c": "I need to be rendered!"
     },
     "signature": ""
   }

                                 Figure 3

Authors' Addresses

   Christian Smith
   MIT

   Email: csmth@mit.edu


   Thomas Hardjono
   MIT

   Email: hardjono@mit.edu
























Smith & Hardjono         Expires August 10, 2017                [Page 5]